Transport requests are not reflected in destination client

Hi,
I'm transporting a request contains the values from table
V_T510F_B Assign Pay Scale --> Currency from Developement to Quality but it is not reflected in Quality server?

hi,
Please make sure that tables are not opened in both source and destinaiton server, as it will hold the locks on objects,
Seconldy , sometimes it takes few minutes to reflect on the target server, wait for sometime then check the changes,
Check the transport logs to make sure your request transported successfully.
Take the above precautions and reimport the request.
Regards,
SM

Similar Messages

After transport changes are not reflecting to other users

HI all it's urgent
One user abcd who had made some changes to some screens is not reflecting to other users after transport we have 2 clients 100 and 200 changes are reflecting in own user id we transported with scc1 transaction
with regards
vinod

I am not a developer, so pardon me if I misunderstood this question. I thought screens and other repository objects are client independent. That means the change should be evident in all clients without a need to transport.
Is this to do with security by any chance ( though it seems unlikely )? Can the other users see the change in the original client in which the request was made? That should help you determine whether the problem lies with the transport or outside. Also you can check the contents of the transport in SE01 and see if it holds the kind of data that you are expecting it to. I am guessing you have already generated the screen after saving the changes.
Hope this helps,
Sanket

After transporting changes are not happening

Hi All,
As per the requirement we need a change in the pricing procedure ZJEXPS
(Export Sales Switch). We made the changes in transaction code V/08.
But after transporting the request to quality server, changes are not reflecting there.
I had checked the request number all the tasks are there and transport was completed with warning.
our consultant created another request and then also after transporting changes are not reflecting.
How it is happening particular to this request?
How to trace this? Kindly suggest me.
(Ours is two system landscape with master client 009 and quality client 007.I am trying to transport to 007)
Regards,
Nagendra.

Hi
Check the import logs. If you are getting warnings that original objects cannot be replaced. You need to import the change request in unconditional mode. During performing imports select option, overwrite originals.
Some times the requests contain the objects, which are original to the target system, e.g SAP standard objects.
Check if this could help you.
Regards
Rahul

Changes are not reflected when objects transported from Quality to Productn

Hi
In case of moving some Transport requests from Quality to Production, some times the changes made to the selection screen of a report program doesn't reflect in Production. Also we don't see any Transport error while transporting. Moreover, we can see the changes by regenerating the Program in production.
Would any one help me out in this with the reason for this.
Pls suggest what needs to be done.
Satish.

HI,
Thanks for the reply.
- I have checked the respective transport too, and every thing seems to be fine.
- Recently we went to go live, for the next release, so earlier before go live, we didnt faced any proble.. Only now we are facing this problem, that we find the changes relating to selection screen are not reflected when the object / prog is moved from qty to Prd.
- Only problem is with the selection screen.(not getting reflected in PRD. In Qty we are able to see those changes.
- Then in order to reflect these changes in PRD, we have to re generate the object, then only it get s updated..
Satish.
Edited by: satish c on Sep 22, 2009 3:35 PM

Changes are not reflecting in QA after transport

Hi Everyone,
I am having an issue with the transport in PI. After making the changes in development, i exported the tpz file to Quality. The changes got reflected. Then for testing purpose some changes were done in the Quality IR. Now i again exported the tpz file from dev to QA. But the same changes are not reflecting.
Has anyone faced such a problem? Need your help experts.

Hello,
Check in IR > Environment> cache status overview. Is it in green status??
Check if the import of .tpz file is successful in quality IR??
>>Then for testing purpose some changes were done in the Quality IR
Also, check if there are any conflicts in the IR of quality system??
-Rahul

Service request fields enhanced through AET are not reflecting in BW DS

Hi All,
the CRM developer has added 3 service request fields to crmd_orderadm_h, crmd_service_h via AET. He has marked all the 3 fields as 'BW reporting relevant'.
I have now checked the BW extractors in the hope that these 3 fields will now be appended to the BW service request datasources automatically.
But instead of adding the fields to service request datasource(0CRM_SRV_REQ_INCI_H)(BUS2000223), it added the 3 custom fields to process datasource 0CRM_SRV_PROCESS_H.
I am not sure what exactly have gone wrong . Is there a way to get these custom fields automatically into 0CRM_SRV_REQ_INCI_H.
Thanks in advance,
Ramz

Hi Ramz,
this seems to be identical to
Re: Fields enhanced through AET are not reflecting in CRM DS Extract structure
Please find my reply there.
Best regards
Matthias

Changes are not reflected in Script output

Hi All,
i am facing a problem in SAPscript.
I have made a Zscript by copying standard script F110_FR_CHEQUE. I have made the changes in the script as per requirement in development client and transported it to testing client to test (As i dont have any data in development client). But, surprisingly, when i run the program and check the output, the changes are not reflected in the script output.
First i thought that my script was not triggered thats whay i m not getting any change, but later i changed the dimension of one of the window, in which some hard coded text is written, the differece i found was that, window size is changed, but the text written in that window is still same (what was in standard script.) .
I am using standard texts for hard coding in script. Standard texts have been transported in testing client also.
please help me in this regard.

Hi,
Could you plese Check NACE whether your script is confiugring or not.
If it is configured well then Check Standard Text is available or not in Test client by open it in SO10.
Check all the paragrah formats applied to Standard text are transferred to Test client which are in SE72.
IF it is available in SO10 then debug the print program for that windows any standard conditions are calling to print the text.

Changes are not reflect in PRD

Hi All,
i have an issue that is
i want to be small change correction in one report in BI DEV system,the changes had done successfully with one transport request,when i transport the request into BI PRD which has been not reflect but in quality changes been accommodate
suggest any one
Thanks In Adv
muraliv

hi bhanu thank you for your response
sap doesn't do magic i know ,but cahnges are not reflected into my production system ,it was the fact,i am not here to waste my time to post the unreliable things
the released transport request ended with RC 4 but i didnt find any chane but in quality its getting reflected,
i am also tried one more new request to my query and then release but i didnt work
thnak you

Changes are not reflecting in Quality server

Dear All,
We have recently installed the Portal 7.4 servers.
Currently we are having two servers Development and Quality.We have Configured NWDI using CMS and created tracks(Defined run-time systems as Development and Consolidation) we are able to checkin the activities at NWDS , when we are selecting the component in the consolidation and on click of import we are getting the message as import finished, but the changes are not reflecting at the Quality server. i.e in earlier 7.01 version when we imported , the ear was deployed automatically in quality but it is not getting deployed in the new version 7.4
Regards,
Ramana.

Dear Ervin/Jun Wu,
Thanks for the Responce.
As per the given link the track is configured with out any issues (When we are clicking on Deployment in the Transport studio it is opening new tab like below and we are not having any errors when we click on Start deployment nothing is happening)
http://hostname:50000/webdynpro/dispatcher/sap.com/tc~SL~CMS~WebUI/Deployer?BS=EPD_PRTADEV_C
Please check the below log regarding deployment when we do the import
SDM-deployment-notification Log file.
20141028125231 Info :Starting Step SDM-deployment-notification at 2014-10-28 12:52:31.0994 +5:00
20141028125231 Info :Deployment is performed asynchronously.
20141028125231 Info :Following DCs are marked for deployment (buildspace = EPD_PRTADEV_C):
20141028125231 Info :
20141028125231 Info :RequestId: 152
20141028125231 Info :==> no resulting DCs for deployment
20141028125231 Info :Follow-up requests:
20141028125231 Info :
20141028125231 Info :
20141028125231 Info :Step SDM-deployment-notification ended with result 'success' at 2014-10-28 12:52:31.0995 +5:00
Regards,
Ramana.

Create a new transport request for note 898614

Hello,
I want to set up the service desk function in the solution manager 4.0.
In the IMG I'm pointed to note 898614. Here the settings are described but not clear anough for me.
Here are the first two steps:
1) In transaction SCPR20, activate the following BC set:
SOLMAN40_SDESK_BASICFUNC_000. Activate this in expert mode with the option "Overwrite everythng".
2) Create a new transport request (transaction SE09) in the source client (000) of your Solution Manager system. Unpack the file Piecelist_Service_Desk_Init.zip from the attachment to this note. Copy the contents of the file Piecelist_Service_Desk_Initial.txt to the transport request. Use transaction SCC1 to import the transport
request to your Solution Manager client.
Unpack the BC sets contained in the file SOLMAN40_SDESK_SP04.ZIP.
In transaction SCPR20, activate the BC sets. The BC sets contain additional actions.
Activation must take place in expert mode using the option "Overwrite everythng".
Then, implement Note 931196 if necessary.
My question is how do I create a new transport request and how do I import the file Piecelist_Service_Desk_Initial.txt in to this request.?
If I press the button create in tr-se09 I could choose between 6 differend transports. Which wan do I have to choose?
And how to import the Piecelist_Service_Desk_Initial.txt file.
Kind regards,
Richard Meijn

Hi,
go to SE09 in Client 000 and create a transport request of type workbench. You may use copy&paste from piecelist text file to add objects to your transport request.
Logon to your production client where you want to use Service Desk functionality and import that transport using transaction SCC1.
/cheers

Updated (VORowImpl ) values are not reflected in inline POPUP table

Hi Expert,
Currently i am getting exception when i try to update my iterator binding,
Here is my use case,
I have view object displayed inside the inline popup as a table. When i modify one of the cell i am firing the value change listener and it is called the ViewObjectRowImpl class method. Inside the method i do some computation (i am executing some DB query to get back some value). After the query execution i am updating the other columns data based on the changes.
First i have PPR the table and check out the update values. Unfortunately the change values are not reflected.
Then i used the following code
DCIteratorBinding itrBinding = findIteratorBinding("EmployeeVO1Iterator");
if (itrBinding != null) {
itrBinding.executeQuery();
itrBinding.refresh(DCIteratorBinding.RANGESIZE_UNLIMITED);
Now i am getting the " JBO-25003: Object EmployeeMgmtAM of type ApplicationModule is not found."
May i know what went wrong? Am i missing anything. May i know how can i refresh the UI table based on the updated VORowImpl. Looking forward hints.
Thanks

Thanks Frank, Actually i am accessing the client method as follows,
DCIteratorBinding itrBinding = findIteratorBinding("EmployeeVO1Iterator");
if (itrBinding != null) {
EmployeeVORowImpl employeeVO = (EmployeeVORowImpl)itrBinding.getCurrentRow();
empoyeeVO.methodName();
May i know what is the different between accessing the method as shown above and access via the MethodBinding?
How about access the attribute of the View object using the above approach? i.e empoyeeVO.getName() like ....
Also i have configure the ADF looger to finest level and found the primary reason to "Applicaiton module not found" was some entity validation. But this not always happened. Same test case works fine and fails sometimes. I am clueless. Could you please throw some light.
Thanks
Edited by: user1022639 on Feb 7, 2012 5:24 PM

Changes are not reflecting while executing the SAP script from report

HI,
In SAP-script we are nmaking changes in form in client 130
it is showing the changes in 140 client but while excuting the report the same are not reflecting in the output.
Thanks in Advance
Naveen M

Hello.
Scripts are mandant depentant. So you must copy from 130 to 140 for changes take efect.
Do it in transaction SE71 in mandant 140, first screen, in the menu options.
And never forget to activate it in all mandants.
Best regards.
Valter Oliveira.

Changes are not reflecting in the Quality

Hi,
These are standard SAP Components. I have imported the ESS and MSS Packages.
Actually 3 Development Components are using in my application (Tra,TraTri and TraTre).Tra is the root DC.
I have made changes to those objects and sucecessfully build without errors.
After check-in all activities those activities are working fine in Development system.
But those changes not refclecting in Quality system. So i was founded build log error in Consolidation.
I was fixed the error in the Development system and build the components without build error.
still now changes are not reflecting in the quality system.
But out of 3 DCs(Tra,TraTri,TraTre) Tra and TraTre are working fine in Quality(changes are reflecting) only problem in TraTri DC (changes are not reflecting in the Quality)..
Please help me as soon as possible....Its very help full for me
Regards
Sudhakar Reddy A

Hi Slava,
very very thanks to you for the fast reply. but one thing in my side.
When i release the activities after successful build, i export those changes and place them in the import queue of the consolidation system in the CMS.
The export in the SAP NetWeaver Developer Studio packs all selected activities into a change request, and then places them in the import queue of the consolidation system.
When the my system administrator imports this request into the consolidation system, the released changes are integrated into the DTR workspace of the consolidation system; the build server compiles the modified components.
my system administrator findout build error in consolidation system:
[wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   com.sap.xss.tra.tri.vc.changepersno.VcTriChangePersNo --> ContextModelNode PersonnelNumberCheck [modelClass]: The context model node has not been bound to a model class (Hint: A Context model node has to be bound to a model class or mapped to a model node of another controller.)
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.I_Employeenumber: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   com.sap.xss.tra.tri.vc.changepersno.VcTriChangePersNo --> ContextModelNode PersonnelNumberCheck_Output [modelClass]: The context model node has not been bound to a model class (Hint: A Context model node has to be bound to a model class or mapped to a model node of another controller.)
     [wdgen] [Info]    com.sap.xss.tra.tri.vc.changepersno.VcTriChangePersNo --> ContextModelNode PersonnelNumberCheck_Output [supplyingRelationRole]: Supply function or supplying relation role missing (Hint: A child node which is not mapped must have either a supplying relation role or a supply function or one of its parent nodes must have a supply function.)
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.E_Name: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   com.sap.xss.tra.tri.vc.changepersno.VcTriChangePersNo --> ContextModelNode PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return [modelClass]: The context model node has not been bound to a model class (Hint: A Context model node has to be bound to a model class or mapped to a model node of another controller.)
     [wdgen] [Info]    com.sap.xss.tra.tri.vc.changepersno.VcTriChangePersNo --> ContextModelNode PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return [supplyingRelationRole]: Supply function or supplying relation role missing (Hint: A child node which is not mapped must have either a supplying relation role or a supply function or one of its parent nodes must have a supply function.)
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Type: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Message: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Log_No: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Field: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.System: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Message_V1: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Message_V3: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Message_V2: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Log_Msg_No: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Number: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Message_V4: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Parameter: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Id: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Row: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   com.sap.xss.tra.tri.vc.changepersno.VcTriChangePersNo --> ContextValueAttribute EmployeeName [readOnly]: The context attribute has to be read-only. (Hint: As the mapped context attribute is read-only this attribute has to be read-only, too.)
I was fix error in my development system with out any build errors. still now not working ...pls give me any suggestion.i dont have access to consolidation system.
Regards,
Sudhakar

Query changes are not reflecting

Hi All,
Scenario: We have changed in Query from Query Designer in BED system and moved to Quality system but the changes are not reflecting. After checking tables RSRREPDIR and RSZCOMPDIR, we found out the information as below:
Note: Production System - BEP
Quality - BEQ
Development - BED
We have 2 issues with Queries in different systems as below:
Issue 1: Query name: T01
Issue 2: Query name: T02
Issue1:
Table - RSRREPDIR
BEP -
COMPUID : 4U2P65LLZVYUZLGQFYPVZ1R2M   (also present in table - RSZCOMPDIR)
GENUNID : 4U2QC61SREY9HKJFVEHM894CU
BEQ -
COMPUID : 4T6BTKW1X3RYN7H2UO4WMLWLQ   (also present in table - RSZCOMPDIR)
GENUNID : 4T6BUM0LKCPAO5H71ZG983P72
COMPUID : 4U2P65LLZVYUZLGQFYPVZ1R2M   (also present in table - RSZCOMPDIR)
GENUNID : 4U2QC61SREY9HKJFVEHM894CU
BED -
COMPUID : 4T6BTKW1X3RYN7H2UO4WMLWLQ   (also present in table - RSZCOMPDIR)
GENUNID : 4T6BUM0LKCPAO5H71ZG983P72
COMPUID : 4U2P65LLZVYUZLGQFYPVZ1R2M   (not present in table - RSZCOMPDIR)
GENUNID : 4U2QC61SREY9HKJFVEHM894CU
Issue2:
Table - RSRREPDIR
BEP -
COMPUID : 4U18JA5FD2PB9ZB1RS0PWS5E6   (also present in table - RSZCOMPDIR)
GENUNID : 4U188U6N2623QPCTMC43MFOZY
BEQ -
COMPUID : 4T6MDKABLUBC46HOKZMC0K6KU   (also present in table - RSZCOMPDIR)
GENUNID : 4T6MEWPZ6178KB4LDKDREY34E
COMPUID : 4U18JA5FD2PB9ZB1RS0PWS5E6   (also present in table - RSZCOMPDIR)
GENUNID : 4U188U6N2623QPCTMC43MFOZY
BED -
COMPUID : 4U18JA5FD2PB9ZB1RS0PWS5E6   (not present in table - RSZCOMPDIR)
GENUNID : 4U188U6N2623QPCTMC43MFOZY
but in Table - RSZCOMPDIR
BED -
COMPUID : 4T6MDKABLUBC46HOKZMC0K6KU
GENUNID : 4T6MEWPZ6178KB4LDKDREY34E.
Please suggest which query element and from which table we should remove to have a sync with all systems.
Thanks in advance!!
Regards,
Niranjan Chechani

If possible can u Compare Bex queries in All 3 systems Using RSRTQ tcode, Either they are matching or not?
How to compare using RSRTQ u can Refer Below :
Compare Bex Queries in Different Client /System.
Regards,
Seshu.P

The transport request are pending in the import quene

Hi the transport request are released from the development system and are showing pending in the production system

Hi Shri,
According to your query you have only two system landscape. If this is true then before import transport to prd from dev to import in send box which is test client. If everything is ok then you can import this transport in prd server with stms tcode.
If you have any doubt pls mentioned here in details.
Regards,
Anil

Transport requests are not reflected in destination client

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for