Transportation Route in Contract document

Hi all,
I created sales document type- G=contract. This document includes neither Sold-to nor Ship-to, its quantity contract that the sales manager create for specific market abroad. The market or country that the goods will be send to, specify by the Route, because there no country (no ship-to-partner). However, the system deletes the Route input by the user after press Enter.
As known the system could not determined the route because there no ship-to, but I need this input anyway. Form the debug I found that the route will not be deleted if there is a Plant/Shipping point in the document.
I will appreciate any suggestion to define the goods destination country, with the described document type.
Thanks in ahead.
Ido

I got solution.
It has been done using copy routine in shipment type.

Similar Messages

Multiple CTS+ non-abap transport routes

Gurus:
We find a document about CTS+ as follows:
https://websmp104.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000517932007E
On above picture, OTO is the shared DEV system.
1) Is this correct?
2) if we have different DEV systems for different landscapes, what should we do?
All are non-abap ststems in this discussion.
Thanks!.

Hi,
the transport route's definition that you described (OTO as start system of all transport routes for CTS) is only valid if your CTS-System is on NW 7.0 SPS 12. Starting with NW 7.0 SPS 13, the 'real' development system is also set as the starting point in the transport route.
Are you using SPS 12?
You can find a detailed description on CTS+ on help.sap.com: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/45/ec25370fdc3481e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
If you need information on CTS, please take a look at the CTS page here on SDN: Change and Transport System
hope this helps
Karin

Setting Up Transport Routes

Hi,
Can you Please send me some Document's or screenshots of setting up Transport Routes between
ECC>>> DEV-QA-PRD Systems on [email protected]
Thanks in Advance.

All the information you need is available at help.sap.com
we (at least me) don't send documents to e-mail accounts because as you may have noticed this is a discussion forum meaning no offline exchange
Read the following link for all details on how to config the TMS,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/44/b4a09a7acc11d1899e0000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Regards
Juan

Updating contract document extension fields from workflow

I have a multi-step contract document workflow which routes first to an attorney and then through a series of business approvers. The business approvers might reject the workflow for a number of non-legal related reasons which would not required the legal document to be changed. I want to flag the document when the attorney approves in case the workflow is ultimately rejected and later restarted, the legal approval step can be skipped if the attorney previously approved and the legal agreement file has not been changed. I have been unable to update a contract document extension field from within the middle of a workflow. The system has the contract document locked but I'm not sure if that's what's blocking me and if so, can I unlock the document, make the change, and relock the document from the post-script?

Jeff,
Unlocking/Relocking might be the right approach. You also may be experiencing a privilege issue based on the user running the script (but I doubt it if you are able to update other fields based on approvals). Let us know what you find out!
-Howie Wexler, Crafty Systems Inc
978 273 3600

Getting a Page Cannot be Displayed error while uploading a Contract Document in SAP E-sourcing for size 500mb

Hi Guys,
I am getting a Page can not be displayed error while uploading a COntract Document in SAP-E-soucing 7.0.
Maximum Size set in Our SYSTEM is :9765MB.
Approx size of the Document tried is more then 300MB.
Appreciate your help on this.
Regards
Tarun

Hi Tarun,
Please check the below system properties using system user login
attachments.maxSizeKB.buyers - "Maximum size in KB of a employer-attached attachment file"
attachments.upload.enable.buyers- " Enable/Disable uploading of attachments by internal users"
Also Please check with other attachment, contracts related properties in the System.
Let me know if this helps.
Thanks,
Raj.

Unable to add transport route in HANA Application Lifecycle Management (XS)

Hi There,
When we are using HANA LM to create transport routes then routes are created but straight away it comes with following error message:
Internal Error: Transport Route(s) could not be retrieved.
We have checked that required roles are assigned to user. Roles are
sap.hana.xs.lm.roles::ExecuteTransport
or
sap.hana.xs.lm.roles::Administrator
Same works in DEV and PROD environment. I ran debug in Chrome and found that it is throwing an error when trying to run following:
http://XXXX:portnumber/sap/hana/xs/lm/core/transport.xsjs?enrich=true&_=XXXXXXX
After looking in HANA studio I have found that transport.xsjs has got following function which will throw above error on exception:
function retrieveTransport(req, res) {
if(!utils.checkForPrivileges(res, [ "sap.hana.xs.lm::Display"])){
    return;
var item = utils.getItem(req.path);
var enrich = req.parameters.get("enrich");
var deleted = req.parameters.get("removed");
try {
    if (typeof item === 'undefined') {
      var transportRoutes = trans.readAllTransports(deleted);
      if (enrich) {
        enrichTransportRoutes(transportRoutes,deleted);
      utils.setNoCacheHeaders(res);
      res.contentType = 'application/json';
      res.setBody(JSON.stringify(transportRoutes));
      res.status = $.net.http.OK;
    } else {
      // retrieve transport path id
      var tpath = trans.readTransport(item);
      if (!tpath) {
        utils.reportError(res, null, utils.getText("TRANSPORT_ID_INVALID", item));
      } else {
        res.contentType = 'application/json';
        res.setBody(JSON.stringify(tpath));
        res.status = $.net.http.OK;
} catch (ex2) {
    utils.reportError(res, null, utils.getText("ROUTES_NOT_RETRIEVED"), ex2.toSource());
Please see attached chrome console log for more info:
I am able to retrieve information about this but I am not sure what is causing this. Your help will be really appreciated.
Regards
Angad

I've also tried the following wlst:
createJCRFileSystemConnection(server='SERVER-MS1', appName='application', name='Repository', path='/APP/ContentRepository/')
But then i'm getting:
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Could not find MBean operation "createConfig(java.lang.String)" for MBean registered under "oracle.adf.share.config:ApplicationName=application,name=ADFConfig,type=ADFConfig,Application=application" and implementd by "class oracle.adf.mbean.share.config.RuntimeMXBeanImpl"
Error in creating configuration with name "oracle.adf.mbean.share.config.runtime.webcenter.doclib.AdfDoclibConfig"
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Could not find MBean operation "refresh()" for MBean registered under "oracle.adf.share.config:ApplicationName=application,name=ADFConfig,type=ADFConfig,Application=application" and implementd by "class oracle.adf.mbean.share.config.RuntimeMXBeanImpl"
An error occurred while performing "setAttribute" on "PrimaryConnectionName"
javax.management.RuntimeMBeanException: These mbeans encountered exceptions and may not have been saved
Repository- JCR -- Could not do this operation, the backing store for this context is read only.Edited by: Harry van Oosten on May 10, 2010 10:33 PM

Creation of Purchase requisition with reference to Contract documents

Dear All
I am not able to create the Purchase requisition with reference to Contract documents, in outline agreement field if I enter the contract document number which is already existing it is not copying the details, again I have to enter all the details like Plant, Material, document type, Qty etc. Even after selecting the PR document type as RV for outline agreement also it is not coping. Kindly let me know that can we not able to give reference of Contract number in this outline agreement field to create Purchase requisition.
regards
Dhanu

1.Logistics--Materials Management--Purchasing ---Purchase Requisition --Follow-on functions --- Assign and Process
2.ME57
3.Select the Assigned Purchase Requisitions checkbox if you also want to see requisitions already assigned, and choose Execute.
4.On the Assign and Process Purchase Requisitions screen, select the requisition lines for your material.
5.Choose Assign Manually if the info record already exists.
6.On the pop-up Assign Source of Supply Manually dialog box, make the following entries:
Agreement 46XXXXX Agmt item 10
7.Choose Assign Source of Supply.
For assign the source of supply, you can also choose Assign Automatically (only if not already assigned by MRP due to existing source list). If more than one source exists, select the contract in the Source Overview for Purchase Requisition 100XXXXX window and confirm with Enter.
When assigning a source, make sure to select the contract.
8.Choose Save.
9.Select the line item, and then choose Assignments Overview (SHIFT+F5).
10.On the Assign and Process Requisitions: Overview of Assignments screen, select the line below Vendor (you can only select one at a time), then choose Process Assignment.
11.On the Process Assignment: Create PO window, check and make sure the Order Type (NB), Purchasing Group and Purch. Organization fields then choose Continue (Enter) to confirm.
12.On the Create Purchase Order screen, select the requisition in the Document Overview section and choose Adopt in the left part of the Document Overview screen.
13.Choose Save.

Read-only Collaborator can edit Contract Document properties

We have a master agreement with a read-only collaborator. The security profile for this collaborator role is identical to the stock "Document Reviewer" profile, i.e. only View is set.
However this supposedly read-only collaborator is able to edit Contract Document properties. They click on the Contract Documents tab, then drill into a Contract Document, and then click on the Edit button. From there, they have the ability to change fields such as Name, Descrpition, Effective Date, etc. They cannot change or delete the actual file attachment itself.
Is this an issue with CLM, or is there some security setting we are missing somewhere? Please tell me this is not working as designed ..
thanks.

Hi Terry,
According to your description, my understanding is that you don’t want the yollow bar notification to display when you open Access documents.
This issue seems to be about the client application. Please compare the followings with the things that you did:
1.Open the documents
2.Click File->Options->Trust Center->Trust Center Settings
3.Click Protected View, unselect ‘Enable Protected View for originating from the Internet’
4.Click Message Bar, select ‘Never show information about blocked content’
5.Click Macro Settings, select ‘Disable all macros without notification’
In addition, as this issue is about Office, I commend you create a new thread in Office forum, more experts will assist you with this issue.
Office forum:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?category=officeitpro
I hope this helps.
Thanks,
Wendy
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

ChaRM transport route, one development, 2 QA, 2 PRD system landscape

Hello,
We have a customer who has an ERP system with a transport route which is the following:
One single Development system which feeds, 2 QA systems and then 2 PRD systems.
We are to implement ChaRM and we want to customize the tickets so that every time you execute the import action of a transport request into QA (and later into PRD) both systems QA1 and QA2 are updated and later on with PR1 and PR2.
We would like to know how to support this scenario in Solution Manager using ChaRM. How do we set up the logical component at SAP, how we define the transport route and layers, and how we define the actions in the SDHF ticket.
I appreciate your help.
Regards
Esteban

Hello,
We set up a testing environment for change request management. In a solution manager we created five clients. One single development which feeds two quality systems, and final two production system. As it was said in the thread we used transport groups in the transport route. The development system feeds this transport group which feed to import queus in quality systems. We tested this transport route and transports worked well and arrives into both production 1 and production 2 systems.
Then created a logical component for that landscape, with five sytems. Then we created a maintenance project using that logical component. We created a maintenance cycle and then a task list was created which shows two delivery system, and the two productive systems. All the groups have the right actions.
However when we created a SDHF correction the system creates the task list only for 3 systems, not for the five of them.
we see that only action groups are created for development, quality 1, and production 1. No entries for quality 2 and production 2
We try to run the action which is in the general part of the task list to execute the import in multiple systems, it cames out with the correct selection of importing in quality 2 system because it is the transport group. However an error is raised saying that the actions for quality 2 are not there in the task list which is true. Finally, as short term solution, we were able to import into quality 2 and later on pr1 but done manually in the stms transactions which is not what we want to do.
Regards
Esteban Hartzstein
Edited by: Esteban Hartzstein on Aug 24, 2010 2:06 AM
Edited by: Esteban Hartzstein on Aug 24, 2010 2:07 AM

Not able to attach final signed document in the contract document

Dear Experts,
The upload field for final signed document in the contract document is visible only for the latest/last contract document if there are more than one contract document exist in the Master Agreement.
For the previous contract documents, not able to attach final signed document (i.e) the upload field is invisible.This scenario is occuring only in few master agreements, mostly found in Legacy agreement types.But for newly created legacy agreements this scenario is not occuring.Please help me in finding out why the upload field is visible only for the last/latest and not for the previous ones.

Hi Dinesh,
Did you find a solution to this?
Regards,
NR

Vendors Unable to Check-In Contract Documents (e-Sourcing 5.1 Patch 06)

Vendors Unable to Check-In Contract Documents (e-Sourcing 5.1 Patch 06)
When moving to patch 06 for e-Sourcing we found that Vendors were no longer able to check-in contract documents, even though they checked them out successfully.
On Patch 05 this was not an issue with the exact same configuration.
Has anyone had any encounters with this?
- Is there a permission that needs to be set to something specific? I tried create/read/edit but that doesn't seem to work.
Thanks.

When working with a Master Agreement or Sub Agreement within e-Sourcing you can attach Contract Documents (Word files) that you and the vendor can collaboratively work on.
Just like a source control system you can check out a document to make edits to ensure that no one else makes edits at the same time. You then must check back in the document to remove the 'lock'.
On patch level 06 we found that although Vendors could perform the Check-out procedure (On a Contract Document click Actions -> Check-Out) they are not permitted to then check-in the document (Actions -> Check-In).
Buyside users do not experience any issues with check-out/in.
Hope that helps clear up the issue.
Thanks,
Greg

What's the difference between transport route and transport layer

what's the difference between transport route and transport layer,Can somebody give me some explaination? thks in advance!

Hi,
Transport Layer in ABAP Workbench
    The Change and Transport System supports the distribution of development
    work on large projects across multiple SAP Systems.
    The packages in each development system are grouped into one transport
    layer.
    The transport layer determines whether objects are assigned to a local
    or transportable change request.
Use
    Each of your SAP development systems is assigned a transport layer as
    its standard transport layer. If you use Extended Transport Control, you
    can assign different standard transport layers to certain clients.
    You can define at the most one consolidation target for each SAP System
and transport layer.
When you create a package, it is assigned the standard transport layer
of the SAP System.
If you want to assign a different transport layer to a package, you
require the administration authorization for the Change and Transport
System.
The objects in a package automatically have the transport attributes
defined for the corresponding transport layer.
o   If a consolidation route originating in their SAP System is defined,
     then the objects are assigned to a transportable request, and
     transported into the consolidation target when it is released.
o   If a consolidation route is not defined, the objects are assigned to
     a local request, and are not transported.
Customizing settings are not assigned to a package. They have the
transport attributes of the standard transport layer of the system or
client.
It is best to assign a package a standard transport layer for which a
consolidation route originating in the development system is defined.
To display and maintain the transport layers and routes, use the
Transport Management System (transaction STMS).
Only the system adminstrator can make changes.
Caution:
     The tables TSYST, DEVL, TWSYS, TASYS are no longer productive as of
     Release 4.0A and cannot be maintained.
Regards
Ben

Not able to check-in file after contract document in executed phase

Hi All,
I am trying to attach the final signed document to contract document after EXECUTED phase.
The default behaviour shown on application is, when Contract Document is in EXECUTED phase, Check-in, Check-out is disabled on edit(pencil icon). Also, delete option is still enabled(Trash Icon). It should be disabled.
Please suggest how this can be resolved.
Thanks,
Saloni

DMS Folks.....
if you came across this type of error then let me know ...
Am I missing any configuration ?
For HTTP request (like portal/webdynpro) do we need HTTP content server or normal content server will work for same.

COMPUTE_BCD_OVERFLOW error while saving transport routes

Hi,
When we are creating new transport routes with domain controller ABC. It is giving the above dump.
Dont know what to do. FYI we deleted previous TMS config and created new one.
Thanks,
Rohan

Check the values which you are passing to the BDC.. the data type should be changed for a field.
You can execute the BDC with mode 'A' & check.
Best regards,
Prashant

How can I add a system to the transport route?

Hi,
      I have a DBP --> PBQ --> PBP systems and now I have a new environment TRN (Training system) and I want to include this system in the transport route.
Right now the transport route is configured like I said 'DBP --> PBQ --> PBP' and I want to include this environment (TRN) to the transport route because I want that the system pass automatically the orders that going to PBP system to TRN too in the same time that pass it to PBP. For example, like this:
                 PBP
DBP --> PBQ ==>
                 TRN
How can I do that?
<removed_by_moderator>
Read the "Rules of Engagement"
Thanks people!!
Edited by: Juan Reyes on Apr 16, 2009 8:57 AM

Hi Carlos,
whatever be the environment, whether it is DEV, QA or PRD, when you login into an ABAP SAP system and run transaction STMS,
In the initial screen, it always shows two fields, System and Transport domain.
System field contains the SID in which you are currently logged in.
Transpor Domain shows value like this: DOMAIN_SID
here this SID is the domain controller for the system in which you are logged in
However, if you are logged in the domain controller system itself and then run STMS, then it will show in the lower half of the screen, that, you are logged in as a Domain Controller.
To be more clear, run STMS in any system and Menu->Overview->Systems->Second column 'TMS system type' must contain a 'domain controller symbol' against one sytem SID. this SID is the domain controller.
thanks
Bhudev

Transportation Route in Contract document

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for