Treatment for horizontal transfer of cons unit

Hi All,
Suppose there are two cons groups-'Group A and Group B'- both in the same level in the hierarchy.
Cons Unit 1 is present in Group A.
In 6/2009, Cons unit 1 was moved from Group A to Group B. This is a horizontal move, so in Group B, 6/2009 will be the First consolidation and divested in Group B in 6/2009.
Now in 3/2010, Cons unit 1 is moved back from Group B. This is also a horizontal move, so it will be divested in Group B in 3/2010. But my question is what will be the first consolidation in Group A?
Will it be the old first consolidation date that was present for this unit in Group A historically(12/2007) or should it be changed to 3/2010.
Thanks for your help in advance.
Regards,
Mohan

Dear Mohan,
As per my analysis, In this case we need not to maintain 2007 after the transfer of LE from Group B to A in 2010 - 003.
For our further analysis it would be helpfull, If you can mention why would u need to maintain historical date (2007)in consolidation unit master data rather current date (2010)?
Thanks
Kamal
Edited by: kamal kishore on Mar 17, 2010 6:29 PM

Similar Messages

HT3702 I have never ordered anything. Everything in this list. Press to edit. To purchase anything from this game. Answer "No" for the transfer of the game. It has cost me a lot of money. I did not like it and would not pay this amount. For games that

I have never ordered anything. Everything in this list.
Press to edit. To purchase anything from this game.
Answer "No" for the transfer of the game.
It has cost me a lot of money.
I did not like it and would not pay this amount. For games that are too expensive.
Billed To:
[email protected]
preethep notate
Bangkok
Bangkok 10400
THA
Order Number: MHBG76LW0Z
Receipt Date: 22/05/12
Order Total: $49.99
Billed To: American Express .... 7009
Item
Developer
Type
Unit Price
Real Football 2012, Suitcase full of coins
Report a Problem
Gameloft
In App Purchase
$49.99
Order Total:
$49.99

This is a user to user forum. Apple is not here. Apple does not read here. Apple does not post comments or answers here.
Use the Report a Problem link on the receipt to contact customer service.
Also, change the password for your Apple ID connected to this account and perhaps remove the bank card information until you have this resolved.
Manage your Apple ID -
https://appleid.apple.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/MyAppleId.woa/

Material Ledger for Stock Transfer Postings

Hi All,
I have a question about the way material ledger is calculated for stock transfer postings (movement type 641). I will give an example to illustrate this issue:
Material A has a Standard cost of $10
Material B has a Standard cost of $8
During the month 100 units were transferred from material A to Material B. This created a financial posting as follows:
Credit Material A -          $1000
Debit Material B -           $800
Debit Price Difference    $200
This price difference of $200 was used in the calculation of Actual cost for material B
However, the Actual Cost for Material A was $9. I would have expected the system to use this actual cost to calculate the difference to be posted to material B. Hence the difference used in Material B should have been $100 {(9 8) X 100} and not $200.
Has anyone had a similar issue, or know how the system resolves this (if at all)?
Points will be rewarded for relevance.
Thanks

Dave, I see that your process is slightly different to mine. We do not revalue inventory at month end, instead the material ledger program posts the revalued amount to a reserve account and the actual cost is only a statistical entry. The material ledger calculation is reversed automatically in the new month and the standard price is used for valuation.
I think this might make it difficult for the system to value STO's at actual. I may need to check with SAP.
Thanks

Transfer of Org Unit from one loc to another Loc

Hi ALL,
I have issue regarding transfer of organizational unit from one loc to another loc
is it possible to shift total org unit from one loc to another loc.
what r all prerequisties required for changing.
With Best,
Shaik

Hi,
Depends on how you have your structure set up. Location is usually defined by the Personnel Area. In this case, you should create a new Personnel Area with the new address information for Bangalore. You may also retain some individuals in Mumbai and you want to maintain history so that Personnel Area should remain in the system.
As for the Organization Units and the reporting relationships, these do not have to change if they have not, only the Account Assignment (IT1008) must be changed to the new Bangalore Personnel Area. Also, of course, any employees transferred to the new location must have their Organizational Assignment infotypes ((IT0001) changed to the new Personnel Area.
This can be a straight-forward change.
Paul

Cons unit may now post in ledger US in FY variant K4

hi,
When i run the cxcd data collection task using the data monitor i get this error message :- Cons unit 66210 may now post in ledger US in FY variant K4.
May i know the reason to this?

Hi Raj,
It's very difficult to find out the source of error only using the error message. In many consolidation error message, it does not provide sufficient information to track down the source of error.
So what you can do is to look around the possible source of error. I guess, you must check the consistency setting for the ledger, roll up method, currency and also fiscal year variant.
Have you also check the opened fiscal year?
regards,

Table for the transfer order

hi,
 what is the table for the transfer orders?
thanks in advance..

Hi,
Create delivery via transfer orders:
Once the order is saved proceed through the following steps. The process assumes the item has values in the warehouse bin.
VL04 Delivery due list. Run the delivery due with your order number to create the delivery
LT03 Create Transfer Order. EG. Warehouse: 101 and enter. Picking background. Save
The Transfer order should now be saved. It now needs to be confirmed.
In LT03 go to menu option Transfer Order -> Confirm Transfer Order
Enter
Save
The transfer order is now confirmed.
VL02N Delivery change. EG: Edit the delivery to do the following Pack External customer material number = COO. External delivery number Waybill number. BOL Transport tag. Carrier Header partner SP (E.G. FXP). Tracking number = Packing Unit
Pls reward points.
Regards,
Ameet

Accounting Treatment for CWIP (AUC)

Please Explaing me the Accounting Treatment for Capital Work In Progress.
what are the accounts we need to create for CWIP ( AUC ), & Whats the treatment in SAP.
As per my Knowledge when an asset under con, following entries will be effected.
1. 01.04.06 to 31.03.2007. ( Asset Under Construction ).
    CWIP Exp (P&M) A/c Dr 5000
        To Bank A/c                       5000
(For Exp incurred for CPWIP)
2. Capitlized on 01.04.2007.
      Plant & Machinery A/c     5000
           To CWIP Exp (P&M)             5000
( being Asset has been capitalized on 01.04.2007)
please guide me whether the above details correct or not.
if wrong please send me the procedure for CWIP.

Your entries are correct. In SAP you can settle AUC in two ways
Ist Method
1. Create AUC under 4000 asset class
2. Make postings to AUC through f-90
3. Make distribution rule using T Code AIAB
4. Settle the AUC using TCode AIBU
In step (3) you can distribute the amount spent on AUC to two or more assets otherwise you can give only one asset and then settle the AUC through AIBU.
2nd Method
1. Create an investment order (KO01)
2. System automatically creates AUC under asset class 4001
3. Enter distribution rule in the same screen ( like in the (3) above) or just give a cost center or an asset.
4. Post payments through F-90 and give the order number in that screen
5. Then settle the AUC using TCode KO88
Radha

Document Type clearing items - "Clearing - Cons Unit" Item

We have the matrix organisational structure - both company and profit centre have the Consolidation Unit role.
We have a "Clearing - Cons Unit" clearing Item for certain document types.
Now the client wants to restrict the clearing item so that it only applies one way, i.e;
1 Company and 2 PCs is ok - therefore post a clearing item
2 Companies and 1PC is not ok - therefore we want an error / no posting to clearing item
There is no option available in the document type to make such a setting.
I tried validations per document, but when clearing is posted to in a manual document, the document is actually split into 2 documents (one per consolidation unit (combination of company/PC)) so the validation will treat both scenarios (1Co/2PCs or 1PC, 2Cos) in the same way
of course, it would be possible to validate in a separate task but we want the validation to take place at the time of entry.
Any suggestions?

re-opening, had to close due to SDN error on max number of open questions (supposedly 10 but recently this failed).
NB no urgency, no longer required at my client, interesting little challenge though.

Cons unit change at year end

Hi : )
when performing a cons unit change at the end of the year whereby the old cons group becomes unnecessary as no cons unit is part of it in period 1/2011, do I have to delete the cons group as well from the new hierarchy starting on the 1.01.2011 or do I just delete the cons units out of this old cons group?
Also, as we will have a new cons group and cons unit hierarchy starting from the 1.01.2011 will we not be having a problem displaying period 12/2010 data come January as the hierachy then used in the queries will only have the new structure, i.e. the moved cons units sitting under the new cons group??? Our queries are currently set up to select the hierachy using the default query date...
Your views would be very much appreciated.
Kind regards,
Tanja

Thanks Dan : )
The configuration document that I received mentions to deleting the cons unit in the 1st period following the consolidation group change. So because I am divesting the cons unit in period 12/2010 I interpreted that I can delete the cons unit from the old cons group in period 1/2011 including the old cons group as there are no more cons units within it.
But this will be causing us problems in January for period 12/2010 reporting as the new hierarchy starting on 1/1/2011 that is picked by the queries due to default query date will not be have the old cons group.
So I think by what you said to leave the cons unit and cons group until the year over year reporting is finished will solve our problem.
But here is the example anyway. Maybe there is a different way:
Cons unit A is the only cons unit under Cons Group A and is divested as at 12/2010
Cons unit A is acquired into a new never before existed Cons Group C as at 12/2010
So the currently valid hierachy is valid from 01.01.2010 - 31.12.2010 with Cons unit A now residing in 2 places
In period 1/2011 I deleted Cons unit A under Cons Group A and also deleted cons Group A.
This created a new hierachy that is valid from 01.01.2011- 31.12.9999
So in I am correct in assuming that if our queries use default query date that we will have a problem trying to report on period 12/2010 data in January?
Kind regards,
Tanja

Cons Unit name in UCMON different than in UCWB

Dear team,
I've a question concerning master data of cons unit . Following issue appears:
I know that cons unit is time dependent: the old cons unit name was only valid until 31.12.2009. After this date there are several entries with different valid to dates, but medium and also long name never changed afterwards.
Example:
ConsUnit --- Valid from --- Valid to - long name- medium name
3456 --- 01.12.2009 --- 31.12.2009 --- Old LE name long --- Old LE name
3456 --- 01.01.2010 --- 31.03.2010 --- The new name in long --- New name
3456 --- 01.04.2010 --- 30.04.2010 --- The new name in long --- New name
3456 --- 01.05.2010 --- 31.05.2010 --- The new name in long --- New name
3456 --- 01.06.2010 --- 31.12.9999 --- The new name in long --- New name
If I go thru ucwb --> master data --> consolidation units --> 3456, then I see the following entries:
Name
Medium: New name
Long: The new name in long
So I do see the latest valid entries in ucwb and I assumed to see the same in UCMON. But if I open ucmon for instance for period 005/2010 I see that the old name is displayed instead of the new name. Curious is that if I click on "filter unit" in ucmon that I then get the corret name in the filter menu - but only there! Unfortunately, I still get the old name in the monitor even though the filter menu shows the new name.
Do you've any suggestion how I can solve this issue or what might be the reason for the different names in UCMON and UCWB?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Best Regards,
Daniel

This sounds like a minor bug. I suggest you search SAP Notes for solution and if none is found notify SAP via customer message.

Production Order for a Material with two units of measure?

Hi Everybody I have the following issue.
In my company there is a new production process with a Material that should be configured in the master data with the field "Base Unit of Measure" as per unit (each). But the production process, should be confirmed by tx CO11N, in Kilograms. I know that I can use the additional Data in tx MM03 to set a Production Unit, but the value of convertion would be fixed. For example 122 Kg = 1 each, the thing is that the value in kilograms for each lot can vary, one lot can weight 122 and another one can weghr 125, and in each case I shoul have two units in stock. And as I have the value of convertion fixed, when I confirm each lot one for 122 kg and another for 125 kg I will have 2.025 units in MB52.
How can I solve this problems? I need to have the chance the confirm in kg changing for each lote the quantity but in the base Unit of Measure have one unit for lot. As if for tx CO11N I could have a field where I can set tha x quantity of Kilograms is x each.
Kind regards
Leandro.

Hi Ayoub, First thank`s for your promt answer,
1. The Quantity is different, because is not a perfect process, there is a manual work in the process that makes this quantity differ, there is no big difference, maybe a Kilo or Two but the production mannager wants to have this registered. And besides in productions they manage kilograms, but for selling the comercials manage units (each - EA)
2.The convertion rate is known at the end of the process after cutting and packaging a unit, they weight it.
Regards
Leandro

Report for stock transfer from plant to plant

Hi,
Is there any standard report for stock transfer from plant to plant .
If not is there any enhancements to get the above report.
Regards,
Ravindranath.

Hi Ravi,
U can use the tcode MB51 and their u can give the input as 301 if it is 1 step in the mvt type or use 303 and 305 for 2 step transfer. and generate the report.
if u want the list of stock transport orders then use tcode ME2N and the input parameter as item category "U" and generate the report.
hope it wud have answered ur question
Reward if useful
Shawn

Need to build communication redundancy using serial RS-232 for Data Transfer b/w Host and RT irrespective of TCP/IP Data Transfer

Hi - I would like to build the logic in which it should accomodate the communication redundancy using serial RS-232 for Data Transfer b/w Host and RT irrespective of TCP/IP Data Transfer.
I want to do data transfer b/w host and RT through RS232 VISA portal whenever TCP/IP ethernet cable has been unplugged from the controller continuosly , it should keep on checking for TCP/IP link re-establishing also , when ever the tcp/ip link established again that time the communication should be using in that link only. This is accomplished by deploying the RT vi as execuatbale file. I made some logic regards to the above said logic , bur it was not working as much I expected.
I request you to go through the attached two VI's and let me know , what I did wrong in that,
Please do the needful.
Attachments:
TCP_Serial_Host.vi ‏33 KB
TCP_Serial_RT.vi ‏41 KB

even i am new to this topic and i am trying to get familiar with these protocols
refer to tcp server/client examples in labview examples

Pending Quantity in PO for stock transfer

Dear All,
I want to know the pending order quantity for stock transfer orders (plant to plant),I have tried
ME80FN,ME2L Etc. but all report are showing the pending quantity only after MIGO done by
the receiving plant.
Our requirement is like this that one plant created one stock transfer order to one
plant and he want to know the actual pending order quantity as on date considering
by deducting stock in transit (5B5T) (i.e. PO quantity 100 pcs - quantity delivered 50 pcs then actual
pending quantity should be 50 pcs but in mentioned report it is showing 100 pcs pending).
Please note in our case in every PO more than 800 line items are there.
Can any one inform me about standard report or any table where net pending quantity are getting
stored.I have checked table EKBE,MARD,MARC.
Regards,
SP Shukla.

Hi,
In mb5b u give movement type & check
Generally i do not think there is a std report, this we also faced, we developed a report with the help of ABAPer
Pandari

Excise invoice for Stock Transfer from Mfg. Plant to excisable Depot

Hi Experts,
Which tcode (j1iin or j1is) should be used for creating excise invoice in mfg. plant for transfer the goods to exciseable depot and why.
And if we procure the material in mfg. plant and transferring the procured material to excisable depot then how can we map or assign incoming excise invoice to outgoing excise invoice so that same duty can be transferred.
Thanks in advance and points on satisfying answers.
Kuldeep Dahiya
Edited by: Kuldeep Dahiya on Jul 4, 2008 4:41 PM

Hi There
we will be using J1IIN for the transfer for the simple reason that you cannot move the goods from the manuefacturing plant without paying the excise duty.
regarding your second query I am unable to understand your exact requirement but as per my understanding you will do the good receipt and CENVAT will be credited and outgoing or stock transfer will happen as the regular process afterwards by debiting the excise duty from the CENVAT account
Hope this will help
Manu Seth

Treatment for horizontal transfer of cons unit

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for