TREX search on SAP BW data with result in BEx/Excel?

Hello all!
I want to realize a search on TREX in BW-data with showing the results in an Excel-Sheet.
It works fine on Web but we have no idea at the moment how we can do this in BEx/Excel. How can we ask for data and get the result into the Excel-Sheet?
Does someone has an idea about how this could be done?
Best Regards,
Peter

Hello Karsten!
Your are right. Its more a BI topic. But maybe someone can tell me, how to request data out of Excel from TREX and how to send data from TREX to MS Excel?
Are there connections? functions or anything I could possibly use?
Best Regards,
Peter

Similar Messages

Matrix report data with summary column in excel format

Hi ,
I want to display output of matrix report with summary column in excel format.
I have tried using spreadsheet but column header and actual data is displaying in proper order.
Please tell me the way how to do this ASAP.
Thanks in advance.

Hi ,
I want to display output of matrix report with summary column in excel format.
I have tried using spreadsheet but column header and actual data is displaying in proper order.
Please tell me the way how to do this ASAP.
Thanks in advance.

Working with Result in BEx Query Designer

Dear All,
I have a report showing sales amount customer wise. The result is aggregated for "total" sales amount. Now I want to use that value, total result value in a formula variable for calculation. Can that be done? How can I catch that result to work on it.
Regards,
Jack Silverz

HI Jack,
The result values cannot be used in the formula variables. But it can be used in the calculated key figures using the Overall Result function.
Hope this Helps.
Regards.
Shafi.

Accessing Analysis Services MultiDimensional cube data with Power View in Excel

At this point in time, does Power View in Excel have the ability to connect directly to an Analysis Services multidimensional cube?
If not, is this functionality expected in the near future?
davidg12

Hi,
As far as I known, the Power View for Excel does not support the feature yet, please see this article:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj969574.aspx
I copied part of the article here:
Native support for Power View
With this release, multidimensional models support analysis and visualization by using Power View in SharePoint mode. No special configuration of your multidimensional models is necessary. There are however some differences in how multidimensional model
objects are displayed in Power View compared to other client tools such as Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Performance Point.
This release does not support analysis and visualization of multidimensional models by using Power View in Excel 2013.
====
We may use Power View for SQL Server 2014. For more detail information, please refer to the following link:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/user_ed/archive/2014/01/02/business-intelligence-in-sql-server-2014-power-view-for-multidimensional-models.aspx
Hope it's helpful.
Regards,
George Zhao
Forum Support
Come back and mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
If you have any feedback on our support, please click "[email protected]"

TREX Search Capabilities

Hello
Can TREX search on non-indexed data?
Does TREX support natural language searches?
Does TREX support spider searches?
Best regards,
Luis Carlos

Hi Luis,
   Can TREX search on non-indexed data? No.
   Does TREX support natural language searches? you search using synonym. And other feature is that you can classify documents using taxonomies. There are two kind of taxonomies: query based and example based.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/6c/5145b1d1de11d6b2cc00508b6b8b11/frameset.htm
   Does TREX support spider searches? Yes.
Patricio.

How can we get current time date with resultset?

Dear All,
I have to insert current time date in the table.So,i need to get the current time and date with result set.So,I will first get the time date and then insert it into the table.
I know how can we get current time and date without resultset.i have created this function its working.But now i want to use this.mean using resultset i want to put in the table.
How can i do this?
public static String DATE_FORMAT_NOW = "yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss";
public static String now() {
Calendar cal = Calendar.getInstance();
SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat(DATE_FORMAT_NOW);
return sdf.format(cal.getTime());
}

yuck. Why not simply set a "new java.sql.Date()" to the SQL parameter in question?

Data fails results page display with msdb

I am using Dreamweaver 8 with ASP VB Script. IIS and localhost.
I have a search page, a database and a results page.
I have set up a search page with this code:
<%@LANGUAGE="VBSCRIPT" CODEPAGE="1252"%>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
<title>Key Word Search</title>
<style type="text/css">

</style>
<script type="text/JavaScript">

</script>
</head>
<body>
<form action="data_base_results.asp" method="get" name="search" target="_blank" id="search">
<div align="center">
    <p class="style1">Key Word Search:</p>
    <p class="style1">
      <label>
      <input name="keyword" type="text" id="keyword" value="<%= Request.QueryString("search") %>" size="30" maxlength="30" />
      </label>
      <input name="Submit" type="submit" onclick="MM_validateForm('keyword','','R');return document.MM_returnValue" value="Submit" />
      <input name="Reset" type="reset" id="Reset" value="Reset" />
    </p>
</div>
</form>
</body>
</html>
The data base is set up and tested OK with the following:
"Provider=Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0;Data Source=C:\inetpub\wwwroot\sciweb_root\sciencelinkcafe11kj.mdb"
The results page is set up and tested OK using the following code:
<%@LANGUAGE="VBSCRIPT" CODEPAGE="1252"%>

<%
Dim rsSearch__MMColParam
rsSearch__MMColParam = "1"
If (Request.QueryString("search") <> "") Then
rsSearch__MMColParam = Request.QueryString("search")
End If
%>
<%
Dim rsSearch
Dim rsSearch_numRows
Set rsSearch = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Recordset")
rsSearch.ActiveConnection = MM_connSciWeb_STRING
rsSearch.Source = "SELECT KeyWords, Link, Year FROM Table1 WHERE KeyWords LIKE '%" + Replace(rsSearch__MMColParam, "'", "''") + "%' ORDER BY Year ASC"
rsSearch.CursorType = 0
rsSearch.CursorLocation = 2
rsSearch.LockType = 1
rsSearch.Open()
rsSearch_numRows = 0
%>
<%
Dim Repeat1__numRows
Dim Repeat1__index
Repeat1__numRows = 10
Repeat1__index = 0
rsSearch_numRows = rsSearch_numRows + Repeat1__numRows
%>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
<title>Search Results</title>
<style type="text/css">

</style></head>
<body>
<div align="center">
<p class="style3"> </p>
<p class="style3">HERE ARE THE RESULTS OF YOUR KEYWORD/S SEARCH: </p>
<p class="style3"> </p>
<table border="2" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5">
    <tr bgcolor="#999999">
      <td width="164" height="40" bordercolor="#FF0000"><div align="center" class="style2">Keyword/s</div></td>
      <td width="164" bordercolor="#FF0000"><div align="center">Year</div></td>
    </tr>
    <% While ((Repeat1__numRows <> 0) AND (NOT rsSearch.EOF)) %>
    <tr>
      <td height="22" bordercolor="#FF0000" bgcolor="#00FFFF"><div align="center" class="style2"><%= LCase((rsSearch.Fields.Item("KeyWords").Value)) %></div></td>
      <td bordercolor="#FF0000" bgcolor="#00FFFF"><div align="center"><%=(rsSearch.Fields.Item("Year").Value)%></div></td>
    </tr>
    <%
Repeat1__index=Repeat1__index+1
Repeat1__numRows=Repeat1__numRows-1
rsSearch.MoveNext()
Wend
%>
</table>
<p> </p>
<table width="853" border="2" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5">
    <tr bordercolor="#FF0000" bgcolor="#999999">
      <td width="164" height="40"><div align="center" class="style7"><a href="data_base_search.asp" class="style2">Search again </a></div></td>
      <td width="110"> </td>
      <td width="115"> </td>
      <td width="200"> </td>
      <td width="200" height="40"><div align="center" class="style7"><a href="index.html"><span class="style2">Return home </span></a></div></td>
    </tr>
</table>
</div>
</body>
</html>
<%
rsSearch.Close()
Set rsSearch = Nothing
%>
When the results page is tested the following comes up:
Can anyone help me? Help very gratefully received. Kev

>Yes, I can get a simple ASP page to render
So something that outputs text like
response.write "test"
works fine?
>Should I reinstall IIS7 then?
I would reinstall - the missing exe file is troubling and you need to be able to enable detailed error messages if you have any hope in developing applications. You might be able to configure that via IIS control panel rather than the command line - you'd need to check the IIS forums for more details.
>Is the version of windows and edition OK?
The Windows version you have should be fine. I believe that Windows 7 Home Basic only supports limited IIS7 functionality - no ASP or .NET. But I believe Premium supports it fully.

TREX Search Result Layout: Can you change it?

Hi,
Is it possible to have different flavors for the TREX Search Result Layout?
Ideally would be through the use of parameters in the typical TREX URL. I know that "Navigation.xml" file is hard-coded.....
Thanks.
Dick

Hi Thilo,
Thanks.
But I want to use my new LayoutSet using the URL-based interface to TREX:
https://xxxx.xxxx.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.service?startpage=searchpage&configfilename=navigation.xml&resourcelisttype=com.sapportals.wcm.searchresultlist&searchtype=ctrlpers&selectedsearchin=from_here&selectedsearchfromhere=/room_extensions/cm_stores/pm_storage/workspaces/d4919b6d-ff00-0010-439b-9a59dec17c56&querystring=dog&searchvisible=false&showoptions=false&allowedsortprops=false&selectedsearchaction=fuzzy&selectedmatchesperpage=5&enablesearchsorting=false.
Dick

TREX search results

Hi,
TREX search is working fine and is fetching results. I link to hide the links "Open Folder", "details", & "see also" & "HTML version" etc. How do I do it?
I tried playing with the Search options but it did not help me.
Please let me know how I can hide these links. Thanks in advance.
Janvi

Hi Janvi,
Go to
Content Management->User Interface->Settings->Collection Renderer Settings
Select StandardSearchResultRenderer and select advanced options. Go to Displayed Properties
The Default value is - rnd:icon(space-right=10/alignTop/alignLeft),rnd:displayname(contentLink/[1;2-3]/alignTop/space-right=30) + rnd:action(/alignTop), rnd:thumbnail(/noIcons/alignTop/height=30), rnd:rankvalue([2;1]/alignLeft/alignTop/noColumnSpacing/space-right=10),rnd:documentabstract([2;2-9]/alignTop/primaryTextStyle),col:rating([3;1]/noColumnSpacing/alignTop/alignLeft/space-right=10),modifiedby([3;2]/alignTop/alignLeft/secondaryTextStyle/space-right=10) + contentlength(secondaryTextStyle/alignTop/space-right=10) + modified(secondaryTextStyle/alignTop/space-right=10) + rnd:highlighted_contentlink(space-right=10/alignTop/secondaryTextStyle),rnd:categories([4;2-9]/alignTop/space-right=10)
Remove the rnd:action and rnd:highlighted_contentlink
Change it to
rnd:icon(space-right=10/alignTop/alignLeft),rnd:displayname(contentLink/[1;2-3]/alignTop/space-right=30), rnd:thumbnail(/noIcons/alignTop/height=30), rnd:rankvalue([2;1]/alignLeft/alignTop/noColumnSpacing/space-right=10),rnd:documentabstract([2;2-9]/alignTop/primaryTextStyle),col:rating([3;1]/noColumnSpacing/alignTop/alignLeft/space-right=10),modifiedby([3;2]/alignTop/alignLeft/secondaryTextStyle/space-right=10) + contentlength(secondaryTextStyle/alignTop/space-right=10) + modified(secondaryTextStyle/alignTop/space-right=10),rnd:categories([4;2-9]/alignTop/space-right=10)
Regards
Prakash

Transform TREX search results to RSS-feed

Is it possible to transform the results of a search query to a rss-feed or an xml file that can be used by a feed reader?
Basic idea is to create an information service that runs a scheduled search on defined topics and provides the results in a list that can be sent by email or combined with search results from other sources, e.g. Google News.
Is using the Open Search API the right way?
Any ideas are greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Matthias
Edited by: Matthias Killenberg on Sep 9, 2009 12:47 PM

Hi Richard,
I think, you will mostly have to discuss this with Google. Just like TREX has ways to assume other engines results as TREX' own, Google may have these ways. But integration will mostly have to come "top down" from Google in that case.
And it might be easier to find a way to make your pages (it's a catalog, I assume?) accessible to the Google Crawlers, rather than trying to handover the index.
Regards, Karsten

Exposing TREX Search Results to Google?

Hi,
We have a CRM 4.0 E-Commerce solution and want to take the TREX search engine results (indexes?) and make them available to Google/Altavista/msn/etc index externally.
The idea being a search on the web would hit an entry in our online shop and direct the user to the product when clicked on.
I see that there is a Google Connector but this looks to me to be including Google in TREX rather than the other way around.
Is this possible and if so how ?
Regards
Richard

Hi Richard,
I think, you will mostly have to discuss this with Google. Just like TREX has ways to assume other engines results as TREX' own, Google may have these ways. But integration will mostly have to come "top down" from Google in that case.
And it might be easier to find a way to make your pages (it's a catalog, I assume?) accessible to the Google Crawlers, rather than trying to handover the index.
Regards, Karsten

Highly frustrated with Outlook 2013 Search People box bugs - Multiple Name Results for Same Contact & Inconsistent Results

The Outlook 2013 "Search People" box does not function properly. It frequently displays incorrect results or a mess of duplicate results. I've reported previous issues about this and consolidating my posts into one (with screenshots this
time). Hopefully this message will be forwarded to or seen by the Outlook programmers. It really needs to be fixed.
Outlook 2010 and other prior versions worked perfectly. You search for name, you get ONE result with the info you're looking for. FAST AND EASY. But with Outlook 2013 Microsoft has created a heck of a mess resulting in huge frustration and productivity loss
with such simple but important tasks.
I have hundreds of contacts stored in my Outlook address book, and they all have COMPLETE contact info added.
One major issue that I'm experiencing in the new Outlook 2013 is that I now get average of 4 or more duplicate name results appearing for the same contact. And each result contains different and incomplete contact info, making it impossible for me to quickly
find the basic info I'm looking for. The cause of this issue is that Outlook 2013 now provides results from not only your local address book(s), but it also shows results based on your email history and social media accounts setup.
And there's no way to turn this off, or at least specify what folders and/or accounts the People Search box should use.
To make matters worse, the Microsoft developers conveniently forgot to add some form of an indicator (like a small icon besides each name result in the list) that clearly indicates what result is from what source. So you must manually click on each
result one at a time and repeat the search until you locate the correct one.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my local address book called
Infusionsoft. When I type "Infusionsoft" in the People Search box to quickly find a phone number, Outlook 2013 shows me 7 results with the same name. See the screenshot below:
As you can see in the screenshot above, every result just says "Infusionsoft", so I have to manually click on each name result one at a time and repeat the process until I find the correct one from my address book. This same thing happens with other
random contacts.
From what I can tell, Outlook is pulling results based on based on recent emails I've received from different people with "@infusionsoft.com" in their email address. So the first result shows "[email protected]" (just the email
address), the second result shows "[email protected]", the third result shows "[email protected]" and so forth. I don't want Outlook to show all of that. I just want what's in my address book!
And you would think that the last result would be the correct one from my address book, but no. Sometimes its the 5th result, and other times it's the 3rd or 7th result. So there's no freaking order of things here.
We simply need the ability to turn off searching of email history and other accounts when using the People Search box. Problem fixed.
(And please don't tell me that I need to "link" every incorrect result to one main contact. You shouldn't expect everyone to have to tediously link any and all results that appear to a record. ESPECIALLY when 5+ results for each contact appear regularly.)
ISSUE 2: Some names must be typed in a different way for the Search People to locate them
Another big issue I'm having with the Search People box is that some name searches don’t show the correct result, unless I search for their names in a different way.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my address book named "Dave Johnson". When I type "Dave Johnson" in the Search People box, one result appears, but it's just his email address, only. It's not the result that's stored in my Outlook address
book with his phone number, addresses, etc. Screen shot below:
If I type in Dave's name reverse order (Johnson Dave), no results are found at all.
Now if I just type in just"Johnson" all by itself, it finds Dave's correct result (the one stored in my Outlook Address Book). Along with everybody else that has "Johnson" in their name (see screenshot below)...
I double-checked how I have Dave's name programed in my address book, and it's in there as "Dave Johnson" for both the Full Name and File As fields.
Also, the name order shouldn't make any difference when using the People Search Box anyway. Sometimes I can find people by Last Name, First Name or First Name, Last Name. Only with random contacts does it get difficult finding their info and
I have to do strange things like this to find them from the People Search box.
ISSUE 3: Some Search People results only yield an email address only.
For other random contacts, some search results only yield an email address with no other contact details. But I can open the persons contact card from the address book manually, with the same email address shown! Screenshot below...
In the screenshot above, I have outlined the Search People box results in red, and the Address Book results in green. You can clearly see that "Robert White" is a contact stored in my local address book with full contact details, but the Search People result
only shows his email address! Again, it's not consitent. It's hit or miss with different people.
ISSUE 4: Some results just don't appear at all, but they are in the address book
Another issue I'm experiencing with the People Search Box is that some people simply cannot be found. But I can see their contact info just fine if I click on the "People" tab down at the bottom of the page and type in their name in the "Search Contacts"
field. Why can't the People Search box find certain people? I opened up their contact details and cannot find a single thing that would prevent them from showing up in results.
These are clearly serious bugs that need to be fixed. And I'm shocked as to how this got missed--or ignored during alpha and beta testing. I see the "idea" behind the developers having the Search People box search everything outside of the
address book, but in real world application this causes a heck of a lot of problems & confusion, and it needs to be fixed ASAP.
For technical details, I have Outlook 2013 running on two computers using hosted Exchange 2010. One system is Windows 7 and other is Windows 8. The same problems occur on BOTH computers. As far as my Outlook account setup, I have all contacts stored in the
main address book (no sub-folders or other folders).
Can someone help communicate this message to the Outlook developers??? The "Frown" button limits me to 100 characters and one image. There's no way I can communicate this level of detail and steps to duplicate in 100 characters!

Thanks for your reply.
1) The instant search boxes in each individual page work just fine. If I am on the People page and type in a name in the "Search Contacts" field, it searches my contacts and displays the results that I want. But I should not have to leave whatever screen
I'm in to find people now. In Outlook 2010 and earlier versions, I could be on the calendar page and then search for a contact without clicking off the calendar completely. For productivity-sake, it's a huge waste of time and hassle now.
2) I'm familiar with how contact linking works, and quite frankly it's a huge mess in general. I NEVER create multiple contacts for the same person. I get that Outlook 2013 get confused now when it detects a LinkedIn or Facebook account for the same person
already in my Outlook address book, but we need to have options that allow us to turn off results from some or all social networks. This is a big part of the problem.
Think about it this way - The average person has 150+ LinkedIn connections, and more for Facebook. Many people today have accounts for both and they are setup with the same email address. When Outlook 2013 has to scan all the networks IN ADDITION to your
local address book(s), it's a no brainer that it can get very confused trying to display results.
Another big part of the problem is that Outlooks new search system also scans your email history. I receive emails from people who use multiple email addresses, or emails from companies with multiple reps or ticket systems that send you a unique
ticket ID # ending in the same email address domain. Now Outlook displays people search results based on everything under the sun in my email history. This is beyond frustrating (see my "Infusionsoft" screenshot above in the first post).
Again, I want to stress that for the search examples I referenced, I only have one entry in my Outlook address book for each person. And that's all I want to find when I search for people--what's already in my own address book!
In summary:
We need an OPTION to turn off searching external networks when using the People Search box
We need an option to tell Outlook to not scan email history for people search results (I think this needs to be disabled entirely actually. It's not helpful at all)
There should be a fixed priority for displaying people search results, with local address book results FIRST, followed by social network results.
There should be a clear icon/indicator next to each result that gives you a clue as to where the result is coming from. Your address book? Facebook? LinkedIn? We should not need to click on each result to get a hint as to where it's coming from.
Work out the bugs in general with the new search system.
One other thing that I didn't mention is that the Search People box also shows results for people I'm not even "friends" or connected with on the different social networks. But I've noticed that some people use the same email address for those networks that
I already have programmed for them in my address book, which is why Outlook sometimes shows me these results. Does that make sense?
I'll try rebuilding the index, but after testing Outlook 2013 on 3 different machines so far and seeing the same results (all slightly different results on each machine and very inconsistent), I doubt this will address the issue.

How to take the data from excel list to sap r/3(with time interval)

hi experts,
   how to transfer the data from a third party system(if it is in format of excel) to sap r/3.with that in a particular time interval,it will delete the data from excel sheet.

Hi
use the Fm
'ALSM_EXCEL_TO_INTERNAL_TABLE'
       EXPORTING
            filename                = p_path
            i_begin_col             = '1'
            i_begin_row             = '2'
            i_end_col               = '2'
            i_end_row               = '500'
      giving the starting row and column and passing the ending row and column name
Reward points if useful........
Regards,
Nitin Sachdeva

Integrate data from SAP R/3 with iDOC

Hi,
I need extract data from SAP R/3 with the iDoc method, but I can't found documentation from oracle where explain it how do it?, just I know that for this method ODI use two agent (OdiSAPALEServer and OdiSAPALEClient) and they are part of Open Connector for SAP R/3, so anybody that can help me with this issue?, I will be very grateful, just I need some orientation about how to do it?, for example, I need to be clear if the Open Connector for SAP R/3 is part of ODI or I need iinstall other special connector, etc.
I will be expecting for any answer that can help me.
Best regards

Hi Rodrigoalegrem,
Below llink will helps you for
*Oracle Data Integrator
Getting Started with SAP ABAP ERP Adapter
10g Release 3 (10.1.3)*
URL: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/data-integrator/overview/odigs-sapabap-168070.pdf
Regards,
Phanikanth

Real time synchronisation of sap hr employee data with LDAP

Hi friends,
I wanted to synchronize sap hr employee data with ldap. I have written a abap program for the same which is using ldap connector interface for creation/modification/deletion of employees. I am planning to put this as a scheduled job.
But I want to do it in real time i.e. when the employee is getting created/modified/deleted in sap hr, my program should receive all the values and do the changes in ldap at the same time.
What all options do i have to do this?
I am new to sap hr.
Regards,
Nilz

Hi Nilesh
U can take help of Standard Events in SAP.
Go to Tcode SWELS.Then Activate Event trace.
Go and do creation/modification/deletion for employees and Check which allevents are getting triggered in Tcode SWEL.
This might give U an Initial idea how to go about this.
~BiSu

TREX search on SAP BW data with result in BEx/Excel?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for