Trigger too Large

Hi! friends
I got a problem on my trigger.
I use trigger to solve working flow control.
Today,I have a problem,My Trigger program body is too large cause pls-00123 error.
I look for solution on document.
It said to modualize my trigger.
But How to use :new or :old in sub procedure called by trigger?
Anyone can help me? thank you

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Gints Plivna ([email protected]):
You can call a procedure with all :new and :old arguments
I don't know if you can call them as "in out" arguments or only "in" and then use other "out" arguments to handle changed values in the procedure, but that may be a solution<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Is that mean every value I need to use in procedure must pass by this way(:new.column1,:new.column2,....)
null

Similar Messages

Update trigger fails with value too large for column error on timestamp

Hello there,
I've got a problem with several update triggers. I've several triggers monitoring a set of tables.
Upon each update the updated data is compared with the current values in the table columns.
If different values are detected the update timestamp is set with the current_timestamp. That
way we have a timestamp that reflects real changes in relevant data. I attached an example for
that kind of trigger below. The triggers on each monitored table only differ in the columns that
are compared.
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER T_ava01_obj_cont
BEFORE UPDATE on ava01_obj_cont
FOR EACH ROW
DECLARE
v_changed boolean := false;
BEGIN
IF NOT v_changed THEN
    v_changed := (:old.cr_adv_id IS NULL AND :new.cr_adv_id IS NOT NULL) OR
                 (:old.cr_adv_id IS NOT NULL AND :new.cr_adv_id IS NULL)OR
                 (:old.cr_adv_id IS NOT NULL AND :new.cr_adv_id IS NOT NULL AND :old.cr_adv_id != :new.cr_adv_id);
END IF;
IF NOT v_changed THEN
    v_changed := (:old.is_euzins_relevant IS NULL AND :new.is_euzins_relevant IS NOT NULL) OR
                 (:old.is_euzins_relevant IS NOT NULL AND :new.is_euzins_relevant IS NULL)OR
                 (:old.is_euzins_relevant IS NOT NULL AND :new.is_euzins_relevant IS NOT NULL AND :old.is_euzins_relevant != :new.is_euzins_relevant);
END IF;
[.. more values being compared ..]
    IF v_changed THEN
    :new.update_ts := current_timestamp;
END IF;
END T_ava01_obj_cont;Really relevant is the statement
:new.update_ts := current_timestamp;So far so good. The problem is, it works the most of time. Only sometimes it fails with the following error:
SQL state [72000]; error code [12899]; ORA-12899: value too large for column "LGT_CLASS_AVALOQ"."AVA01_OBJ_CONT"."UPDATE_TS"
(actual: 28, maximum: 11)
I can't see how the value systimestamp or current_timestamp (I tried both) should be too large for
a column defined as TIMESTAMP(6). We've got tables where more updates occur then elsewhere.
Thats where the most of the errors pop up. Other tables with fewer updates show errors only
sporadicly or even never. I can't see a kind of error pattern. It's like that every 10.000th update
or less failes.
I was desperate enough to try some language dependend transformation like
IF v_changed THEN
    l_update_date := systimestamp || '';
    select value into l_timestamp_format from nls_database_parameters where parameter = 'NLS_TIMESTAMP_TZ_FORMAT';
    :new.update_ts := to_timestamp_tz(l_update_date, l_timestamp_format);
END IF;to be sure the format is right. It didn't change a thing.
We are using Oracle Version 10.2.0.4.0 Production.
Did anyone encounter that kind of behaviour and solve it? I'm now pretty certain that it has to
be an oracle bug. What is the forum's opinion on that? Would you suggest to file a bug report?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Kind regards
Jan

Could you please edit your post and use formatting and tags. This is pretty much unreadable and the forum boogered up some of your code.
Instructions are here: http://forums.oracle.com/forums/help.jspa

I am getting error "ORA-12899: value too large for column".

I am getting error "ORA-12899: value too large for column" after upgrading to 10.2.0.4.0
Field is updating only through trigger with hard coded value.
This happens randomly not everytime.
select * from v$version
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE     10.2.0.4.0     Production
TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
Table Structure
desc customer
Name Null? Type
CTRY_CODE NOT NULL CHAR(3 Byte)
CO_CODE NOT NULL CHAR(3 Byte)
CUST_NBR NOT NULL NUMBER(10)
CUST_NAME CHAR(40 Byte)
RECORD_STATUS CHAR(1 Byte)
Trigger on the table
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER CUST_INSUPD
BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE
ON CUSTOMER FOR EACH ROW
BEGIN
IF INSERTING THEN
:NEW.RECORD_STATUS := 'I';
ELSIF UPDATING THEN
:NEW.RECORD_STATUS := 'U';
END IF;
END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01001: invalid cursor
ORA-06512: at "UPDATE_CUSTOMER", line 1320
ORA-12899: value too large for column "CUSTOMER"."RECORD_STATUS" (actual: 3,
maximum: 1)
ORA-06512: at line 1
Edited by: user4211491 on Nov 25, 2009 9:30 PM
Edited by: user4211491 on Nov 25, 2009 9:32 PM

SQL> create table customer(
2 CTRY_CODE CHAR(3 Byte) not null,
3 CO_CODE CHAR(3 Byte) not null,
4 CUST_NBR NUMBER(10) not null,
5 CUST_NAME CHAR(40 Byte) ,
6 RECORD_STATUS CHAR(1 Byte)
7 );
Table created.
SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER CUST_INSUPD
2 BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE
3 ON CUSTOMER FOR EACH ROW
4 BEGIN
5 IF INSERTING THEN
6 :NEW.RECORD_STATUS := 'I';
7 ELSIF UPDATING THEN
8 :NEW.RECORD_STATUS := 'U';
9 END IF;
10 END;
11 /
Trigger created.
SQL> insert into customer(CTRY_CODE,CO_CODE,CUST_NBR,CUST_NAME,RECORD_STATUS)
2                values('12','13','1','Mahesh Kaila','UPD');
              values('12','13','1','Mahesh Kaila','UPD')
ERROR at line 2:
ORA-12899: value too large for column "HPVPPM"."CUSTOMER"."RECORD_STATUS"
(actual: 3, maximum: 1)
SQL> insert into customer(CTRY_CODE,CO_CODE,CUST_NBR,CUST_NAME)
2                values('12','13','1','Mahesh Kaila');
1 row created.
SQL> set linesize 200
SQL> select * from customer;
CTR CO_   CUST_NBR CUST_NAME                                R
12 13           1 Mahesh Kaila                             I
SQL> update customer set cust_name='tst';
1 row updated.
SQL> select * from customer;
CTR CO_   CUST_NBR CUST_NAME                                R
12 13           1 tst                                      Urecheck your code once again..somewhere you are using record_status column for insertion or updation.
Ravi Kumar

Inserted value too large for column

Hi,
I have a table (desc below), with only one trigger wich fill the operatcreat, operatmodif, datecreat and datemodif column at insert and update for each row. When I try to insert, I got the following messages :
INSERT INTO tarifclient_element(tarifclient_code,article_code,prix) VALUES('12','087108',3.94);
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-01401: inserted value too large for column
SQL> desc tarifclient_element
Name Null? Type
TARIFCLIENT_CODE NOT NULL CHAR(10)
ARTICLE_CODE NOT NULL CHAR(20)
PRIX NUMBER
OPERATCREAT NOT NULL VARCHAR2(30)
OPERATMODIF VARCHAR2(30)
DATECREAT NOT NULL DATE
DATEMODIF DATE
NB : tarifclient_code is an ENABLED fk, article_code is a DISABLED fk. All values exists in both referenced tables.
Any idea ?

My trigger is not the problem, I tried to delete it and fill the columns manually and got the same error.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by allanplumb ():
The SQL you have shown us looks OK
(to me, au moins). However, perhaps the
error is in the trigger which fills in
the two operativ fields. It would execute
at the same time as your insert, near
enough.
-- Allan Plumb<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
null

Insert value too large

I do not understand why SQL*Plus thinks that the values being inserted are too large.
SQL> insert into customer (customer_id, name)
2 values ('0001', 'Jim');
insert into customer(customer_id, name)
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01401: inserted value too large for column
ORA-06512: at "OC000.T_CUSTOMER_CHANGES", line 3
ORA-04088: error during execution of trigger 'OC000.T_CUSTOMER_CHANGES'Here are the tables:
SQL> desc customer
Name                            Null?    Type
customer_ID                   NOT NULL VARCHAR2(2)
name                              VARCHAR2(20)

Table structure:
SQL> desc customer
Name                            Null?    Type
CUSTOMER_ID                   NOT NULL VARCHAR2(2)
NAME                                 VARCHAR2(20)Trigger structure:
create or replace trigger customer_c
after insert on customer
for each row
begin
   if inserting then
           insert into customer_audit
                   (customer_id, name)
           values
                   (:new.customer_id, :new.name)
    end if;
end;
/

Program too large error

Hello Friends
I am using oracle forms 6.
I write code on button's WHEN-BUTTON-PRESSED event and then compile that trigger at that time i am getting error
"program too large"
Ofcourse on that event coding is large but what i have to do to avoid that compilation error.
i serched for solution then i got that
.ENABLE COMPILER SIZECHECK write this command but where to write or to set this property?
Can any one know then please help me.
Or if another solution then i appreciate with that solution.
Thanks in advance...

Before you play with any compiler parameters (which is not recommended) you might want to try the following first.
1- Remove all unnecessary lines from the code, like carriage returns.
2- Remove all extra spaces, or comments you do not need.
But most importantly, remove your code from the trigger and put it in an PL/SQL Program Unit in your form and call it from the WHEN-BUTTON-PRESSED trigger.
Also you can break your code into smaller procedures so you can call it separately.
Regards,
Tony

BW Web Report Issue - Result set too large

Hi,
When I execute a BEx Query on Web I am getting “Result set too large ; data retrieval restricted by configuration (maximum = 500000 cells)”.
Following to my search in SDN I understood we can remove this restriction either across the BW system globally or for a specific query at WAD template.
In my 7x Web template I am trying to increase default max no of rows parameters, As per the below inputs from SAP Note: 1127156.
But I can’t find parameter “Size Restriction for Result Sets” for any of the web items (Analysis/Web Template properties/Data Provider properties)….in the WAD Web template
Please advise where/how can I locate the properites
Instructions provided in SAP Note…
The following steps describe how to change the "safety belt" for Query Views:
1. Use the context menu Properties / Data Provider in a BEx Web Application to maintain the "safety belt" for a Query View.
2. Choose the register "Size Restriction for Result Sets".
3. Choose an entry from the dropdown box to specify the maximum number of cells for the result set.
The following values are available:
o Maximum Number
o Default Number
o Custom-Defined Number
Behind "Maximum Number" and "Default Number" you can find the current numbers defined in the customizing table RSADMIN (see below).
4. Save the Query View and use it in another Web Template.
Thanks in advance

Hi Yasemin,
Thanks for all help...i was off couple of days.
To activate it I can suggest to create a dummy template, add your query in it, add a menu bar component add an action to save the query view. Then you run the template and change the size restriction for result set then you can save it by the menu.
Can you please elaborate on the solution provided,I created dummy template with analysis and Menu bar item...i couldn't able to configure menu bar item...
Thanks in advance

Query is allocating too large memory error in OBIEE 11g

Hi ,
We have one pivot table(A) in our dashboard displaying , revenue against a Entity Hierarchy (i.e we have 8 levels under the hierarchy) And we have another pivot table (B) displaying revenue against a customer hierarchy (3 levels under it) .
Both tables running fine under our OBIEE 11.1.1.6 environment (windows) .
After deploying the same code (RPD&catalog) in a unix OBIEE 11.1.1.6 server , its throwing the below error ,while populating Pivot table A :
Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
*State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 96002] Essbase Error: Internal error: Query is allocating too large memory ( > 4GB) and cannot be executed. Query allocation exceeds allocation limits. (HY000)*
But , pivot table B is running fine . Help please !!!!!
data source used : essbase 11.1.2.1
Thanks
sayak

Hi Dpka ,
Yes ! we are hitting a seperate essbase server with Linux OBIEE enviorement .
I'll execute the query in essbase and get back to you !!
Thanks
sayak

I have a 500 GB hard drive and a 1TB Time Capsule running on a MacBook Pro. It was all working well until the MacBook went in for a repair a week or so ago. Since then, TC will not perform a backup; instead, it says the backup is too large for the disk

Since having my MacBook Pro repaired (for a video problem) Time Capsule returns the following message: "This backup is too large for the backup disk. The backup requires 428.08 GB but only 192.14 GB are available."
I notice that there is also a new sparse bundle.
Since TC has my ONLY backup (going back about 4 years) I am reluctant to wipe it and start over fresh as I am afraid of losing files.
Is there a way of dealing with this?
I am using Snow Leopard 10.6.8

The repair shop likely replaced a major circuit board on your MacBook Pro, so Time Machine thinks that you have a "new" computer and it wants to make a new complete backup of your Mac.
You are going to have to make a decision to either add another new Time Capsule....or USB drive to your existing Time Capsule....and in effect start over with a new backup of your Mac and then move forward again.
For "most" users, I think this is probably the best plan because you preserve all your old backups in case you need them at some point, and you start over again with a new Time Capsule so you have plenty of room for years of new backups.
Or, as you have mentioned, you have the option of erasing the Time Capsule drive and starting all over again. The upside is that you start over and have plenty of room for new backups. The downside is that you lose years of backups.
Another option....trying to manually delete old backups individually....is tricky business....and very time consuming. To get an idea of what is involved here, study this FAQ by Pondini, our resident Time Capsule and Time Machine expert on the Community Support area. In particular, study the pink box.
http://web.me.com/pondini/Time_Machine/12.html
Once you look through this, I think you may agree that this type of surgery is not for the faint of heart. I would suggest that you consider this only if one of the other options just cannot work for you.

Since upgrade to iOS 7 Email error on over 100KB emails "Cannot Send Mail The message was rejected by the server because it is too large." Connecting to Exchange via Activesync

Hi,
Following the upgrade to iOS 7.0.3 on all our iPhone and iPad devices, it has been identified that when sending emails around 100KB in size and over an error message appears on the device stating “Cannot Send Mail The message was rejected by the server because it is too large.” See error message below. The send/receive limit is over 10MB so this is not the issue.
We are in an Exchange Environment using Microsoft Activesync. This issue is not evident in iOS 6. This has been tested on an iPhone 3GS running version iOS 6.1.3. We have been unable to repeat the issues seen on iOS 7 on the older OS. It is not possible to roll back to the older operating system as Apple are no longer signing the software.
We use Microsoft Active Sync to connect to our Exchange servers through a TMG. The issue is very inconsistent, some identical emails go through, some fail. This is not an issue with the send/receive limit as this is over 10MB. The error message when it fails on the TMG is Status: 413 Request Entity Too Large, which we believe is from IIS on the CAS server.
Does anyone have any suggest course of actions to take?
Many Thanks

This resolution have to attend at the server not with the ios device. My employer's mail administrator reject me to correct it from the server. As his concern is, if ither ios devices works why don't mine? So I am helpless than changing my iphone. It works fine for early versions of ios and with androids. And also one of my friends iphone4 with ios 7 (similar as mine) works too. So I guess it's something wrong with my iPhones settings. But basic question I cannot understand is it works in my phone before this ios7 upgrading. And currently working with my yahoo account too. Favourable reply expected.

Error Message "Some content on the PDF is too large to fit on a single page.

I get the below error when I try to download a response as a .pdf:
Some content on the PDF is too large to fit on a single page.
Please go to the "Design Tab" and adjust the contents, the font-size, or divide the flagged items into multiple elements.
Any ideas?

Go to the Design Tab and make sure you switch to the Page View (look the bottom right corner of the screen)
Once you see the Page View (used to see what the PDF will look like for your response) scroll down and you might see which object is being trucated (it will be covered by a red rectangle). This often happen if you have a element that is too big to fit on one page (like a single or multi choice field).
You will need to adjust your element so that nothing is trucated.
Gen

ACROBAT XI Pro -EDIT TOOL SET - POP-UP WINDOW IS TOO LARGE

Good Day -
I've been experiencing very nagging problem since installing recent Acrobat Xi Pro uodate (on windows 7 system):
Specifically - I cannot edit/change the TOOL SET to include needed TOOLS (i.e., that were all previously in my Tool set) as the EDIT TOOL SET WINDOW (i.e., pop-up
window) is TOO LARGE and does not allow scrolling/ or moving down to SAVE any tool sets and or tool set changes. Very frustrating as all attempts (and recommendations from reviews/support) for decreasing the size of EDIT TOOL SET WINDOW (popup) in order to save (i.e. include ANY) tools have been unsuccessful. So for past week I've been unable to include/use any TOOLS for working in (i.e., editing/commenting etc) pdf's. Has anyone else experienced this problem? Would greatly appreciate any / all steps & recommendations for fixing.
Thank-you!

First, make sure you are on the latest update 11.0.09. Help->check for updates should get you there.
If check for updates says that you have the latest, see if the setting: Edit->Settings->General->Basic Tools->Scale for screen resolution and try various options (you'll have to restart Acrobat with each selection)

Cannot decrypt RSA encrypted text : due to : input too large for RSA cipher

Hi,
I am in a fix trying to decrypt this RSA encrypted String ... plzz help
I have the encrypted text as a String.
This is what I do to decrypt it using the Private key
- Determine the block size of the Cipher object
- Get the array of bytes from the String
- Find out how many block sized partitions I have in the array
- Encrypt the exact block sized partitions using update() method
- Ok, now its easy to find out how many bytes remain (using % operator)
- If the remaining bytes is 0 then simply call the 'doFinal()'
i.e. the one which returns an array of bytes and takes no args
- If the remaining bytes is not zero then call the
'doFinal(byte [] input, int offset, in inputLen)' method for the
bytes which actually remained
However, this doesnt work. This is making me go really crazy.
Can anyone point out whats wrong ? Plzz
Here is the (childish) code
Cipher rsaDecipher = null;
//The initialization stuff for rsaDecipher
//The rsaDecipher Cipher is using 256 bit keys
//I havent specified anything regarding padding
//And, I am using BouncyCastle
String encryptedString;
// read in the string from the network
// this string is encrypted using an RSA public key generated earlier
// I have to decrypt this string using the corresponding Private key
byte [] input = encryptedString.getBytes();
int blockSize = rsaDecipher.getBlockSize();
int outputSize = rsaDecipher.getOutputSize(blockSize);
byte [] output = new byte[outputSize];
int numBlockSizedPartitions = input.length / blockSize;
int numRemainingBytes = input.length % blockSize;
boolean hasRemainingBytes = false;
if (numRemainingBytes > 0)
hasRemainingBytes = true;
int offset = 0;
int inputLen = blockSize;
StringBuffer buf = new StringBuffer();
for (int i = 0; i < numBlockSizedPartitions; i++) {
output = rsaDecipher.update(input, offset, blockSize);
offset += blockSize;
buf.append(new String(output));
if (hasRemainingBytes) {
//This is excatly where I get the "input too large for RSA cipher"
//Which is suffixed with ArrayIndexOutofBounds
output = rsaDecipher.doFinal(input,offset,numRemainingBytes);
} else {
output = rsaDecipher.doFinal();
buf.append(new String(output));
//After having reached till here, will it be wrong if I assumed that I
//have the properly decrypted string ???

Hi,
I am in a fix trying to decrypt this RSA encrypted
String ... plzz helpYou're already broken at this point.
Repeat after me: ciphertext CANNOT be safely represented as a String. Strings have internal structure - if you hand ciphertext to the new String(byte[]) constructor, it will eat your ciphertext and leave you with garbage. Said garbage will fail to decrypt in a variety of puzzling fashions.
If you want to transmit ciphertext as a String, you need to use something like Base64 to encode the raw bytes. Then, on the receiving side, you must Base64-DEcode back into bytes, and then decrypt the resulting byte[].
Second - using RSA as a general-purpose cipher is a bad idea. Don't do that. It's slow (on the order of 100x slower than the slowest symmetric cipher). It has a HUGE block size (governed by the keysize). And it's subject to attack if used as a stream-cipher (IIRC - I can no longer find the reference for that, so take it with a grain of salt...) Standard practice is to use RSA only to encrypt a generated key for some symmetric algorithm (like, say, AES), and use that key as a session-key.
At any rate - the code you posted is broken before you get to this line:byte [] input = encryptedString.getBytes();Go back to the encrypting and and make it stop treating your ciphertext as a String.
Grant

Mac Mini display is too large for screen on only one user account

Okay, so I left my two year olds alone for a minute playing the "alphabet game" on my Mac Mini. They only had the keyboard, no mouse but managed to muck up my display leaving me a bit frustrated. The screen is now too large for my Samsung display. The only way to see everything (dock, top bar, etc) is to move my mouse arrow to the end of my display and see it roll back onto the page. I've checked the settings there and they are fine. The MacBook Pro plugs right in and is proper resolution. So I then wondered if another account on the Mac Mini would do the same thing. I logged out of my Admin account and into another and everything looks just dandy. I log back into my Admin account and it's too large and blurry again. The resolution is set correct at 1920x1080 at 60 Hz.
What button did they push on my keyboard that would do this and how do I get it back?? Aargh! Thanks all!

Ha, figured it out myself from another discussion forum finally. Thoght I'd share in case anyone else runs into this. They must have hit "Zoom" by htting the "Control" and scroll buttons at the same time..
Resolution:
You can zoom out by holding down the Option and Command buttons on the keyboard and, while you hold them down, pressing the - key.

I am trying to download my paid for Elements 13 upgrade. When I click on the "download" button, I recieve this message: 413 Header Length too Large

I am trying to download my paid for Elements 13 upgrade. When I click on the "download" button, I receive this message: 413 Header Length too Large. Help?

You can download using direct download link , which I had provided.
Download Photoshop Elements products | 13, 12, 11, 10
During installation , when prompted enter serial number and proceed with the installation .
If you had purchased upgrade serial number.
First enter Photoshop Elements 13 serial number .
Then it will ask for previous qualifying version serial number.
From the drop down list , select Photoshop Elements 12 and then enter Photoshop Elements 12 serial number

Trigger too Large

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for