Troubles installing arch VMware

I'm following this guide:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/In … _in_VMware
And I've installed open-vm-tools. Now when I type /etc/rc.d/open-vm-tools start I get an error.
:: Starting Open Virtual Machine Tools                                                                                         [BUSY]
FATAL: Module vmblock not found.                                                                                               [FAIL]
Anybody know why?

v43, I would like to note that to install the official package from vmware, you'll need to go to settings > install vmware tools > then in the linux shell sudo mkdir /mnt/cd ; sudo mount /dev/sr0 /mnt/cd and just cd /mnt/cd ; cp * ~ ; cd ~ ; gunzip *gz ; tar -xf *tar ; cd vmware* ; ./*.pl
I would like to note that I already tried to do this, but when I went to specify the location of the kernel headers, it couldn't find it. I tried to do pacman -S kernel-header and linux headers and all kinds of other stuff, but it doesn't work. I'm pretty sure that I had the right thing installed, in /lib/modules/3.2.../build/include, but when I typed that in the vmware tools config where it was asking for the location of the headers it said it was wrong. IDK.
Also on your question on how you can get more details on the cause of the failure, you can do sudo strace /etc/rc.d/open-vm-tools. I should also note that open-vm-tools is not a binary. it's a shell script. you can do vi /etc/rc.d/open-vm if you sequentially execute the script, you'll find that it just fails neatly in the beginning of it. I would note that the two scripts it tries to execute in the beginning /etc/rc.d/functions and /etc/rc.d/conf don't exist. Maybe that has something to do with it, but I know for certain that the following test is causing the failure:
modprobe vmblock                 -> returns 127 on my machine
if [ $? -gt 0 ]; then
stat_fail
that's it right there: modprobe is returning some information about what's currently in the system and the test is saying that it failed because of what modprobe couldn't do. This I'm saying speculatively. I don't know what the error code 127 represents. I don't have copy paste for my vm because of this, so someone should paste the /etc/rc.d/open-vm-tools script here after my post.

Similar Messages

  • Having trouble installing Arch Linux to USB key

    Hello,
    I have read the wiki article, but it doesn't answer my question. I am having trouble installing Arch to a USB key (8GB Sandisk Cruzer). I installled GRUB correctly, it booted, but the flash drive was write-protected. In the fstab file, I have the defaults and noatime flags in there. I have never experienced an error like this, and I don't know how to fix it. I have tried to reboot into the Arch CD and mounted the USB, but it just stalls and displays no output. Obviously, if I boot into my USB (you can still boot into it), and do "nano /etc/fstab", it says that I cannot write. In case you were wondering, I am using the root user. Thank you for all your help!
    EDIT: I have Syslinux, the kernel parameters is RW. If I run mount -o remount,rw /dev/sda1, it tells me something like:
    ata3.00: status: {DRDY ERR}
    ata3.00: error: {IDNF}
    end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 21
    Buffer I/o error on device sda1, logical block 0
    EXT4-fs error (device sda1): ext4_remount:4665: Abort forced by user
    I did NOT hit CTRL+C.
    Last edited by aqua123 (2013-09-07 02:01:30)

    I'm a nub, and I think I'll piggy back of aqua's post.  Perhaps we have the same problem
    I have an Asus UX31A with Xubuntu (with grub) currently installed.  I created the bootable USB as per the Arch Wiki UEFI bootable usb page.  I can boot into the main prompt where you can choose "Arch Linux Iso", "shell v1", "shell v2" and "Default prompt."
    Choosing the first option (to get to the the command prompt and begin installing) makes the screen flash once, then just hangs black.  Before the flash I think I see three text lines in the upper left corner, but they flash so fast I can't read them.
    Choosing either of the shell options presents the error:
    "Error loading \EFI\shellx64_v1.efi: Unsupported"  (replace "v1" with "v2" for the other option)
    Any thoughts?

  • Can't install arch in vmware fusion , /dev/tty7 error

    I have the latest vmware fusion ,I downloaded the i686 core iso image. 
    I use vmware fusion (the latest)  i select the default options , when I get to setup if i select "auto prepare harddrive" it fails and tells me to see /dev/tty7 which I can't .
    So i manually partition, and then when I select files to install I get the error "cannot start pacman see /dev/tty7"
    So i thought maybe the disc image was bad, Ive downloaded the iso from different sites/sources with the same problem. It would seem vmware should be the easiest to install to.
    I read the wiki but I don't understand, I have no other issues installing other linux distros in vmware fusion.
    Last edited by itsmeh (2009-05-07 01:59:57)

    Ok got past the auto partition error issue, instead of selecting the first option to install arch from the live disc, select the 2nd option for IDE with no sata drivers in vmware fusion. I think it takes care of both problems

  • Installing Arch on Asus Eee, Already Read the Wiki [Solved]

    I'm attempting to install Arch on my Asus Eee 701 (4GB SSD model) and I made a mistake that I'm having trouble correcting.  First, I accidentally wrote the image to my Eee's SSD, instead of my USB drive.  I tried to install Arch with the installer on my SSD, set up the partitions (one for /, one for /boot, and one for /home), but when I issued the command, it told me that the disk was in use.  It was then that I realized what I did.  I used an Ubuntu LiveCD on another computer to burn the image file again, this time to my USB drive.  I booted my Eee from the USB drive and tried to partition my SSD again, but this time, it tells me:
    Device or resource busy
    This disk is currently in use - repartitioning is probably a bad idea.
    Unmount all file systems, and swapoff all swap partitions on this disk.
    Use the --no-reread flag to suppress this check.
    Use the --force flag to overrule all checks.
    When I boot from my SSD, I get the same message, so I'm not even 100% certain that I booted from my USB drive before.  My USB drive's activity light was on though.
    Is there any way to fix this?  Also, given that I have an SSD, what partitions should I set up and how big should they be?  I can't find any concrete numbers in the wiki.
    Thanks in advance for the help.
    Last edited by Tyrian (2008-11-17 04:14:23)

    I'll try that, thanks.  What would happen if I dismounted the SSD with -f if it was in use?
    EDIT:  I just realized that when I go into the installer, it lets me set up partitions manually (I run the installer, pick "Prepare Hard Drive", "Partition Hard Drives", "/dev/sda").  But how should I set them up?  When I test it by just making one 4GB partition, it tells me, "Wrote partition table, but re-read table failed.  Reboot to update table."  So I rebooted, and it appears to work.  So I deleted that partition, made a 512MB one, rebooted, and repeated until I had 3 partitions in ext2, a 512MB (sda1, bootable), 512MB (sda2), and one roughly 2.5GB (sda3).  I then went to "Set Filesystem Mountpoints", said "NONE" for the swap (due to the avoiding pitfalls section of the wiki), picked "/dev/sda1" as "/" in ext2, made "/dev/sda2" as ext2 called "/var", and made "/dev/sda3" in ext2 called "/home", then said "DONE".  When I say "Yes" as the confirmation prompt, I get this message:
    Error creating filesystem: mke2fs /dev/sda1
    I hit enter and get dropped back to the "Prepare Hard Drive" menu.  I followed this section of the Beginner's Guide too.
    Is there any way to fix this?
    Last edited by Tyrian (2008-11-15 18:37:10)

  • (Solved) Having trouble installing vlc and openoffice

    I am having trouble installing both VLC and Openoffice.
    VLC
    I tried typing in:
    yaourt -S vlc
    At first, it finds the package, and the first time I did it, downloaded quite a bit of stuff, and then it failed after installing a rather large package and then says :
    error: failed retreiving file 'vlc-0.9.9a-6-i686.pkg.tar.bz' from archlinux.unix.heads.org : Not Found
    Any idea what may be causing this?
    OpenOffice
    I tried typing in:
    yaourt -S openoffice
    Then it said it could not find openoffice in my /etc/customizepkg.d and then asks me to change my PKGBUILD and I had no idea what to edit in it.
    Then, it tried to install it,  and it tells me svn is not found in AUR.
    What does this mean and how can I get openoffice?
    Last edited by iscalio (2009-07-09 08:26:02)

    You need to use the -y flag to update your local repository list.
    Ie pacman -Sy
    You can conveniently combine all of your tasks..
    pacman -Sy vlc openoffice-base
    Error retrieving a file means either
    A) The mirror you are using is updating itself and you were unlucky enough to sync right when it was doing so.. youll need to wait a little while and try -Sy again then..
    B) Related to A.. your database could be either older or newer than the mirror you are using. If you switched mirrors recently, this happens sometimes. Most mirrors update ~daily, but some update ~weekly. -Sy to sync.. you could try -Syy to force a full sync so that even lists of supposedly up-to-date repositories (core,extra,so forth) are synced (doing so is only good/useful if you have problems)..
    C) Your mirror is offline.. change it to another one in /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
    D) Your internet is not running / your DNS is not working properly.. try to ping a site you know is online to be sure. Google is always a good choice. ping www.google.com. You can ctrl+c to end it if it responds as expected. Fix your internet (see the wiki) and domain name server (/etc/resolv.conf and your router) if you have problems.
    You may or may not also wish to pacman -Scc in order to clean out your cache of saved packages in case there is a download problem.
    Your post gives the impression you don't understand pacman vs yaourt.. apologies if i'm wrong, but just in case:
    Pacman is used for official binary repository files. Yaourt can do pacman's job in addition to its own with the same syntax (imo it does a pretty slow and lousy job of such though), but it's real original function is primarily to install 3rd party / community packages that the Arch devs either can't or won't maintain (and most often, have not "ok"ed them as safe to install). You should look at yaourt in the wiki.. when it asks you to change the pkgbuild I imagine you mean when it says 'what do you want to edit it with?'.. which you dont need to edit it at all. The reason it asks you is because yaourt can install stuff from AUR, which like I said is 3rd party / community stuff that can contain something malicious (AUR is open to submissions, unlike the official repositories) and you are highly advised to look it over for something fishy before compiling and installing. FYI -- believe me, you don't want to compile openoffice without reaaally good reason on a really fast machine. It hurts. Your machine will be as usable as a doorstop for a very long time while it's doing it's business. Just save your time and patience, install the compiled binary via pacman instead.
    Please use the wiki, forum search functions, and man pages. Most of the Arch community is friendly and knowledgeable, but people get (rightly) irked when their work maintaining the aforementioned to answer queries like this one are ignored.
    Last edited by FrozenFox (2009-07-09 03:26:02)

  • Trouble installing windows on my mac through VM fusion

    im having trouble installing/upgrading my windows program through VMware. i currently have XP.
    Microsoft or VM have zero support and i am looking for anybody who could help

    anywhere really you can buy it from ms directly I believe or amazon
    http://www.amazon.com/Windows-Professional-System-Builder-Packaging/dp/B00H09BOX Q/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1396108612&sr=8-3&keywords=windows+7
    it's the same windows as all computer users who install or has windows preinstalled use

  • Installing Arch without wipe of primary partition?

    Hello,
    Basically I used to run arch on my old system and I'd like to run it on my upgraded system, but I have no way of backing up my files, so I was wondering if I could install arch on a secondary hard drive instead of wiping my main SSD. Is there any way I could do this, I'd really like to keep all my files, if I installed grub on the secondary hard drive and got my PC to boot to that on start, would that work?
    Thank You

    Srgg wrote:
    ANOKNUSA wrote:As with any Linux distribution, Arch will be installed to whatever disk you choose to install it to. Frankly, though, if your data is at all valuable to you, you shouldn't put it at risk until you're able to make a backup.
    Okay, I'm going to put off the Arch Install until I have a method of backing up my data, let's say I ran it in a Virtual Machine, what would I be losing that I'd get from native Arch? The only thing I can think of at the moment is the OS won't be utilizing my hardware completely.
    OpenGL is the biggest loss I can think of.  If you use GNOME 3 you'll likely be forced to use llvmpipe to render all the fancy desktop effects (llvmpipe renders over your CPU so you'll notice a very high CPU load and worse graphical performance.)  You may be able to mitigate some of this if you use VirtualBox or VMWare as IIRC they have experimental hardware acceleration via specially crafted video driver that can pass the OpenGL commands to the host GPU.  Qemu/KVM has no such love (yet.)
    Of course none of this matters if you run a DE/WM that allows you to disable compositioning (even KDE allows you to disable compositioning so you won't have to llvmpipe.)  The rest of the Arch system should run about the same in a VM as it does on bare metal.  There may be a small performance penalty from the virtualization overhead but from my experience it's not noticeable and most people achieve near native performance.

  • [SOLVED] How to really install Open VMware Tools?

    I tried the steps shown in the wiki, but it's not working at all. I have Arch+KDE installed in VMware Player 5. The steps I followed for the installation of VMware tools are:
    pacman -S open-vm-tools open-vm-tools-modules
    systemctl enable vmtoolsd.service
    But after a reboot the Tools doesn't seem to work properly, even If I try to restart with the tools enabled the systems hangs on the process.
    Some help will be really appreciated.
    Cheers.
    Last edited by AurosGamma (2012-12-02 05:09:42)

    There are some known issues regarding the current versions of the open VMWare tools, check this topic.
    The steps you took provide minimal functionality, at least keeping the clock in sync with the host and handling screen resizing. For copy and paste and shared folders, the wiki has some additional info.
    The system seems to hang on reboot, but proceeds normally after about 90 seconds (it's how long systemd waits before forcefully killing the vmtoolsd daemon).
    Some tips to work around current issues:
    - don't use the latest version of xorg-server (use xorg-server 1.13.0-3 instead)
    - issue a 'killall -9 vmtoolsd; systemctl poweroff' to power off the system

  • [Solved] Installing arch on a notebook /w a 2.6.33+ chipset

    Hi,
    quick question:
    I'd like to install arch on a notebook with a chipset that is not supported until 2.6.33.
    The installation images however look rather old, so I'm afraid i won't even get to the installation step where I can chose which kernel to install.
    What's the best way to do this?
    *fixed typo
    Last edited by Zoranthus (2010-04-22 13:41:01)

    If you're referring to the Arrandale Chipset then you probably won't have any trouble with the official installation image. I used it to install a Clarkdale system without any trouble at all. The system even ran fine with 2.6.32 kernel.
    You should use ethernet to connect to the internet during the installation though since your laptop probably has a very new wifi card too. If you choose netinstall you'll get 2.6.33.2-1 or later and you'll be good to go.
    Regards,
    demian
    Last edited by demian (2010-04-20 13:27:23)

  • [SOLVED] Can not install Arch on a VirtualBox

    Dear all,
    I would like to get familiar with Arch and have tried to install in on a Virtual Machine created with VirtualBox.
    Unfortunately I can't even start the installation,
    whenever I select Install Arch_64bit I just see a white cursor and nothing else happens.
    I have found three logs file in my Virtual Machine folders, you can find them here:
    http://pastebin.com/699gGph3
    http://pastebin.com/0ryWVmaW
    http://pastebin.com/2u9siij5
    Can you please help me understanding what is wrong and how to fix it and install VirtualBox?
    Thanks a lot in advance for the help,
    Luca
    Last edited by lucacerone (2014-01-06 14:41:18)

    lucacerone wrote:The ISO thing seems more likely to me, because I never had troubles installing guest OS in my host machine (and yes it is Ubuntu)
    I'll try that and let you know how it goes!
    If the md5 checksout, you probably have a bad setting in your vm within virtualbox.  Check it or delete and re-create.

  • Install Arch on five clients using ssh?

    Hi all,
    We are trying to install arch on five machines using ssh for our clusters lessons, using VirtualBox. We have arch installed on a machine called "Master" and from this we are using PXE server to load Arch (core) iso on the clients. PXE runs fine but for our purpose we have some troubles.
    First of all, we need to boot arch directly, without "Options screen" (screen where you can choose between Load arch, load another OS, reboot, etc...), we NEED to boot arch without user intervention. Then, we need to run up ssh server automatically (maybe parsing any option on PXE config file). And the last issue is to login on client machine as root.
    If we run sshd and allow to connect giving permissions on /etc/hosts.allow file and then try to login on client from Master as root, we can't do this because root has no password but ssh requieres it, this is a problem.
    In short, we need at least to solve this problems:
    * Load arch image directly, skipping load screen.
    * Run sshd on startup and allow access
    * Be able to login as root from our "Master" machine
    Any idea of that? We are thinking about to make an image of our Master machine and use it to offer with PXE, but I think this is a bad idea because client machines has not partitions and our fstab file will try to mount filesystems and this is a problem.
    Thanks for your help, god will be grateful for it and kill no more kittys and sorry for the brick!
    Last edited by Sepho (2010-12-02 20:56:27)

    OK after my 4th attempt, i got it
    My initial situation
    fdsik -l (GPT table format)
    Gerät boot. Anfang Ende Blöcke Id System
    /dev/sda1 1 26 204819+ ee GPT
    /dev/sda2 26 36747 294963432 af HFS / HFS+
    /dev/sda3 * 61682 77826 129678336 7 HPFS/NTFS
    /dev/sda4 36747 61438 198331055 83 Linux
    So, I had Ubuntu running on sda4 (ext4).
    What I did
    1. Installed rEFIT on Mac OS X, and after two reboots it showed up.
    2. In the rEFIT menu, Synchronized with the Partition tool my MBR and GPT table.
    3. Opened Gparted on an ubuntu live cd, in order to format my ext4 partition
    4. Installed Arch using the normal installation procedure, but I skipped the partitioning section, I did only the file system mountpoints step, selecting my sda4 partition.
    5. Installed grub (not grub2) on /dev/sda, the mbr (not /dev/sda4), and activated the windows section in menu.lst
    6. After reboot, I selected from rEFIT the Windows logo (linux logo doesn't work), through the windows logo i get in the standard grub menu, where I can select Windows or Arch!
    Now I'll remove rEFIT and boot trough normal mac os x's bootcamp tool. (if you select windows you get in the grub menu)
    Hope this helps someone!

  • Install Arch Linux, saving /home?

    I have my /home partition, with crucial data on it, and need to preserve it through an Arch installation. The problem is, I have not been able to find, anywhere, any clear instructions to install Arch, saving /home during installation.
    I keep thinking it must be here somewhere, or in the installation and beginner's guide, or online, but I have not been able to find clear instructions on how to do this anywhere - and it's certainly not obvious in the installer. Where in the installer do I tell it NOT to format /home, or to mount the partition as /home but not format it? I have not seen anything clear in the installer where to find these things. I've installed Arch many times, but always did a clean installation, due to this issue, and was always able to backup /home first. This time I can't.
    My /home is reiserfs, and for several reasons, I do not use LVM. I do want to format / (root, the one that is there, same size). /home is on its own partition.
    Is there anyone that can give me good, precise, step-by-step instructions on how to do this? Or can you point me to a link that does have a clear way to do it? This is very frustrating for me, trying to find a straightforward, clear way to do it, and to find things I need to in the installer to do it. It's a first for me, and I love Arch, but have misgivings about the installer. It may take a video or something, not sure.
    Thanks.
    Last edited by dedanna1029 (2012-11-27 22:42:54)

    dedanna1029 wrote:Where in the installer do I tell it NOT to format /home, or to mount the partition as /home but not format it?
    There are no installer anymore. Now you have to cfdisk by hand, mkfs by hand, etc.
    Just don't touch your /home/ partition and you will be fine, but a backup is highly advisable. All you need is to mistype the device number and poof it's gone. Be careful.
    As already said, just format your / and swap, pacstrap into it, install your stuff and mount /home/ when needed.
    Edit: Oh, forgot to mention, I'm installing an early version of Arch, to avoid Gnome3.
    Install media have nothing to do with Gnome. It only includes [base] and [base-devel]. Plus, older install medias are outdated and you will have trouble getting it updating (there were the glibc update, a filesystem update, bsd-init->systemd and a few other big updates). Anyway, next time you will update, you will get Gnome3 anyway. If you really want Gnome 2, use MATE from the AUR.
    Last edited by Max-P (2012-11-27 23:34:12)

  • Installing Arch form AMLUG live-cd

    I try to install arch from amlug live cd (to have KDE installed directely, because i don't have a DSL connection), but it always fail when i choose the swap partition.
    If i ignore this error, abnd continue installation, the system doesn't boot Sad
    Does someone alreayd install arch by this method, or have this trouble ?

    Ok rasat,that's work 
    But now i have another question: when installed, i only have a swap and a / partition, Is it possible to have more partitions ?

  • Problems installing Arch 0.7 base on SATA HDD.

    Hi! I am new to Arch and still a bit of a newbie when it comes to Linux in general. I have a friend who runs Arch who has been trying to help me... to no avail. I am trying to install Arch base 0.7 with an ftp installation on my system. Some of my system is as follows:
    P4 3 GHz, 1024 memory. My HDD setup is:
    Primary IDE Master: [NOT DETECTED] (No drive here!)
    Primary IDE Slave: [Maxtor ide drive] Files
    Secondary Master: [Samsung dvd-rom] (ATAPI)
    Secondary Slave: [CDRW] (ATAPI)
    Third ide Master: [SATA-HDD] OS's Windows and Arch
    My Linux partitioning is as follows:
    sda5 /
    sda2 /boot
    sda7 /home
    sda6 swap
    My Grub file looks like this:
    Linux
    root (hd1,1)
    kernel /vmlinuz26 root=/dev/sda5 devfs=nomount ro
    windows
    rootnoverify (hd1,0)
    makeactive
    chainloader +1
    (I have left out the coad for the title line in this forum)
    My windows loads perfectly but I have troubles booting into Linux, when I add quiet to my Kernel line I get this at bootup:
    Booting command-list
    root (hd1,1)
    filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
    kernel /vmlinuz26 root (etc....)
    [linuz-bzimage, setup=0x1c00, size=0x3d08535]
    uncompressing kernel... OK, booting the kernel.
    ACPI: Unable to load the System Description Tables
    and then my system stops loading, reset button to restart!
    My friend is a bit of a Linux whizz but he was unable to help me out... I have changed my fstab to look like sdaX... (he told me to)...
    Any suggestions?
    thx

    Similar problem here.
    Pre-partitionned my single HDD which is a Sata 80Gb, with sda6 5Gb for Arch, sda9 /home & sda11 swap.
    Installed Wombat which recognized the HDD on /dev/discs/disc0, adjusted the conf files as if i was going to use hotplug.
    Installed Grub on to the "/" (sda6) partition as I plan to add others distros.
    Also  installed Grub on a new ext2 formatted Floppy with :
    umount /floppy
    /usr/local/sbin/grub --batch <<EOT
    root (fd0)
    setup (fd0)
    quit
    EOT.
    When I boot with that floppy, grub recognize HDD as hd0 and "/" as 6th partition : I can TAB to "vmlinuz26 without a glinch
    Then it boot ... untill I get this message :
    "sata "kernel panic - not syncing: vfs: unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)""
    Should I edit /etc/rc/conf with some more modules/daemons that those by default ?
    Presently I'm copying my Arch mirror (current & extra) on to another partition to get last packages. Because my box comes with an ULi network controller that was added to the kernel modules early in October, so I want to chroot into my present install, update to latest kernel, udev, dbus & hal, & see what I can do thereafter.

  • Trouble installing the apps after downloading Adobe Creative Cloud

    I am having trouble installing the apps after downloading Adobe Creative Cloud. The following Error messages show up:
    ERROR: Third party payload installer vcredist_x64.exe failed with exit code: 2147942750
    ERROR: Failed to repair Microsoft Visual C++ 2012 Redistributable Package (x64). Please try repairing it by double clicking on the executable at "C:\Users\KATHER~1.CDA\AppData\Local\Temp\{63EDD438-B4D0-424C-B05A-7990C09D955C}\Illustra tor_1

    Third party payload installer vcredist_x64.exe failed with exit code: 2147942750

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can I use FaceTime with an aftermarket USB webcam?

    I'm currently looking at getting a Mac mini and using an aftermarket DVI monitor that doesn't have a webcam. I'd still like to be able to use FaceTime with my Mac so I'm looking at an external USB webcam. I'm just wondering if this will work or if I

  • Creating a container

    Hi hello, I have been playing around with muse, i hope someone can help me with this really frustating issue. I have seen all the videos about how to create content that fits dynamically on the page but i dont find the way. I am trying to create a co

  • ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL Level 1, ORA-01882: timezone region not found

    Hi, This is the error I am receiving when I attempt to make a database connection on SQL Developer. Can someone please assist me as to how to resolve this error. Thank you Regards Casper Seloane

  • Mac Pro running slow with FCP...

    Hi, I have a Mac Pro OS 10.5.8 FCP version 6.0.1 I've had the computer about 8 months and edited roughly 45 hours of footage on it so far. I use an external hard drive as my scratch disk capacity 931 GB (359 GB available). About a month ago I started

  • Cisco RV016 dropping company POP3 connections

    I am getting crazy with our Cisco Linksys RV016. It handles 3 simultaneous connections to the internet using 3 ISP. All  our company goes to the internet using this cisco linksys RV016, our  corporate switches are connected as clients to the router.