Trunking in Solaris 10

Does anyone know how to trunk two Gigaswift ethernet interfaces? The Solaris Trunking software is only supported on Solaris 7-9. There doesn't seem to be built in functionality in Solaris 10 to enable trunking.
Thanks,
Dwain

Check out the Nemo project:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/networking/
And from Sunays (http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/sunay/20050526) blog:
"Coming back to Nemo, it also does trunking for both 10Gb and 1Gb NICs in a pretty simple way. We demo'd a trunk of 2 10Gb NICs on a 2 CPU machine during the Sunlab's openhouse in april and we ran over 12GBps over the trunk! There are some other cool things Nemo will allow us to do and one of these days I will tell you the details."
I'm not sure if GLDv3 is supported in Solaris 10 GA, you might have to get the latest Solaris Express.

Similar Messages

Sun Trunking on Solaris 10

How do you install Sun Trunking package on Solaris 10? Is it on the Solaris 10 CD? Looks like the Sun Trunking 1.3 download is just an update. The default install did not install the package.

SunTrunking is not part of any version of Solaris.
You should be able to get the version for Solaris 10 free from the Sun download center at www.sun.com.
Darren

Solaris 10 Gives Error (ld: fatal: relocation error: R_386_32) w/ gcc-4.2.3

I am attempting to run a build of a system known as nauticus under Solaris 10 but I am getting the following error:
ld: fatal: relocation error: R_386_32: file .rel.debug_info: section: /home/dmclaug/trees/gcctree/trunk/build-solaris-4.2.3/src-nauticus/bin/solaris/libsmftypes.o: offset: 0x23e3d6: relocation requires reference symbol
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
This system has been successfully built using gcc-3.2.3 under Solaris 10, but the error above is generated now that we have installed gcc-4.2.3. Does anyone have any idea what might be causing the problem here? Are there additional flags or switches that are required?
Some additional background on my system:
Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.10 Generic January 2005
Sun Streaming Server Development Package for Solaris Update 4.
PackageVersion=2.0
cat /etc/release
Solaris 10 8/07 s10x_u4wos_12b X86
Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Assembled 16 August 2007
isainfo -x
amd64: sse3 sse2 sse fxsr amd_3dnowx amd_3dnow amd_mmx mmx cmov amd_sysc cx8 tsc fpu
i386: sse3 sse2 sse fxsr amd_3dnowx amd_3dnow amd_mmx mmx cmov amd_sysc cx8 tsc fpu
isalist
amd64 pentium_pro+mmx pentium_pro pentium+mmx pentium i486 i386 i86

The bootstrap compiler is GCC 3.4.3.
I tried Sun's assembler (/usr/ccs/bin/as) too and got another error (below)
I also tried bootstrapping with Sun's Studio 12 compiler but that too failed.
*$ pkginfo -x SUNWbinutils SMCbinut*
SMCbinut binutils
(x86) 2.17
SUNWbinutils binutils - GNU binutils
(i386) 11.10.0,REV=2005.01.08.01.09
*$ whence gcc*
/usr/sfw/bin/gcc
*$ gcc -v*
Reading specs from /usr/sfw/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/3.4.3/specs
Configured with: /builds/sfw10-gate/usr/src/cmd/gcc/gcc-3.4.3/configure prefix=/usr/sfw with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas with-gnu-as with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld without-gnu-ld enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-shared
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.3 (csl-sol210-3_4-branch+sol_rpath)
The error this time is:
/big1/usr.local.src/gcc-4.3.1/s10i/./gcc/xgcc -B/big1/usr.local.src/gcc-4.3.1/s10i/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/bin/ -B/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/include -isystem /usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/sys-include -g -fkeep-inline-functions -m64 -O2 -O2 -g -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -isystem ./include -fPIC -g -DHAVE_GTHR_DEFAULT -DIN_LIBGCC2 -D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED -I. -I. -I../../.././gcc -I../../../../gcc-4.3.1/libgcc -I../../../../gcc-4.3.1/libgcc/. -I../../../../gcc-4.3.1/libgcc/../gcc -I../../../../gcc-4.3.1/libgcc/../include -DHAVE_CC_TLS -o gcov.o -MT gcov.o -MD -MP -MF gcov.dep -DLgcov -c ../../../../gcc-4.3.1/libgcc/../gcc/libgcov.c
Assembler: libgcov.c
"/var/tmp//ccYcw90K.s", line 1936 : Syntax error
Near line: " repz cmpsb"

Trunking on a T2000 using the internal ipge interfaces.

We have a new T2000 with solaris 10 + sun trunking for solaris 10 installed.
Has anyone been able to setup trunking on a T2000 using the internal ipge interfaces
The T2000 has four of these interfaces and would be nice to run trunking over a pair for performance / redundancy reasons.
I did first look at link aggregation in solaris 10 but the ipge interface is recognised as a legacy device not supported by link aggregation.
Thanks for any help

From: http://www.sun.com/servers/coolthreads/tnb/parameters.jsp
Improving Network Performance by Transitioning from ipge to e1000g Network Drivers
Transitioning to the e1000g network driver provides significant enhancements to network performance as a result of:
* better handling of small network packet sizes
* lower processor utilization
* network port link aggregation (trunking)
To transition to the e1000g driver, please follow the steps below:
* Install patch 118833-24 or later
* Convert from ipge to e1000g by installing patch 123334-02 and running the script provided
* Update the /etc/system file so that is contains only the following command:
set pcie:pcie_aer_ce_mask=0x1
* reboot your system
No tuning is needed for e1000g

ISCSI and trunking

Hi,
I am setting up a test environment for evaluating iSCSI and we would like to know if Sun Trunking 1.3 and iSCSI under Solaris 10 is supported, we would also like to implement jumbo frames as well.
Has anyone tried this kind of configuration?
Thank you in advance for any information!
Chris

I think you should be using dladm rather than Sun
Trunking with Solaris 10.
Also, you don't say, but if you're planning to use
Solaris iSCSI targets, then they don't exist in
Solaris 10 yet, you need OpenSolaris for target
support at the moment.Thanks for your reply.
The iSCSI target was a NetApp appliance. We actually
did find that Sun Trunking 1.3 works fine with
Solaris 10 as well as jumbo frames.
We used Sun's quad (ce) gigabit Ethernet adapter and
trunked two ports on the host end.
Thanks again.
I'll have to look into dladmMain. update 2 of Solaris 10 has native iSCSI initiator.
Works great on 3PAR's storage array.
M

Sun Trunking 1.& kern Warning Hardware address trying to be our IP addresse

Using Sun Trunking 1.3 on a solaris 10 11/06 V490 server.
setenv local-mac-address? is set to true
Obviously server Aggregate MAC address corresponds to first NIC local MAC address. Second NIC has its specific MAC address.
Aggregate seams OK (traffic continues undisrupted when unplugging a card)
but :
1) Should I worry kernel is logging from toime to time messages such as :
WARNING: IP: Hardware address '00:14:4f:3b:60:f4' trying to be our address IP_address !
2) There is no load balancing between the 2 NIC interfaces as reported by nettr -stats 0 interval=2
Traffic always flows using NIC 2.
Appreciated,
Lor.

That depends on the switch.
SunTrunking 1.3 is compatible with Cisco EtherChannel for example. I believe there's a manual configuration on the switch to say that these two ports are participating in an etherchannel linkage. SunTrunking is an 802.11ad protocol. If they haven't done that, then the switch is just assuming the two ports are normal and have separate hosts behind them.
If instead of SunTrunking you were using Solaris 10 Link Aggregation, then you'd ask the networking guys to turn on LACP, which sets up a communication so the devices can describe their trunk/network setup. SunTrunking doesn't let you do that.
What interfaces do you have on the Solaris box?
Darren

Using Trunking 1.3 to create a trunk accross two switches

Hi:
I have installed Solaris Trunking 1.3 on my SF 880 which is running Solaris 10. It has two CE interfaces which i have configured in one trunk. Failover works fine when I connect them to a single Nortel 8000 switch. The problem is that I can't get failover working properly when I connect one CE interface to a Nortel 8000 switch and the other CE interface to another Nortel 8000 switch. Should this work? I have seen many references, eg in the Solaris Trunking 1.3 documentation, that actually says you can't create a trunk accross switches but i also found BUG ID 5079123 which says you can.
By the way I can't use the version of trunking software that is bundled with Solaris 10 because it doesn't support the CE interfaces.
Cheers
Steve

Thanks for your reply. I should have mentioned that i don't need load balencing over the trunk to work. I just need failover to work. In fact that is just what the bug id says i should be able to do across two switches. Here's a copy of the bug id:
Bug ID: 5079123
Synopsis: Trunking 1.3 to support L2 failover across switches
Category: enet_trunking
Subcategory: softwareState: 10-Fix Delivered
Description: Due to overwhelming requests to support L2 failover solution for Sun NIC across two switches. This is not trunking or Link aggregation feature as it breaks the standard of all trunk members connect to one switch.
Requirements are :
1. provide Layer 2 failover similar to IPMP(layer 3) and yet be simple enough to configure.
2. No loadbalancing.
3. Connect across two switches. and when one switch/nic fails, the traffic moves seemlessly and instantly.
4. Failback: When the failed link is back online, traffic moves back to original link. Date Modified: 2004-09-08 06:13:32 GMT+00:00
Cheers
Steve

Solaris 8: Multiple primary interfaces connected to the same network

I have a machine with Solaris 8, and it has multiple interfaces that are connected to the same network which means they all have metric 0 (1 hop) to the default gateway.
assume:
e1000g0: 192.168.30.70
e1000g2: 192.168.30.72
e1000g4: 192.168.30.74
e1000g5: 192.168.30.76
gateway: 192.168.30.65 (Cisco Router)
However, it seems like despite the fact that they have a direct connection, they seem to be using e1000g0 to access the 192.168.30.0 network to get to the default gateway and then to anywhere else.
When I send a ping to say, 192.168.30.74 (IP of e1000g4) and capture packets on e1000g0, I see the "echo reply" messages going out of it as opposed to e1000g4 even though e1000g4 is the one receiving the "echo request". This should not happen and these should be completely independent as they should all be advertising a 1 hop to that network
The outputs from netstat -rn and ifconfig -a are shown in the picture on the link below
[http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/7308/ifconfignetstathiddenip.jpg]
This gets even more confusing when I go into the Cisco router and run the command: "show mac address-table" where only the MAC address of e1000g0 is shown for the switch port it's connected to, but not for the other interfaces which are connected to the switch. Yes, all ports are active (no shut) and are pingable.
Also, the odd thing is that ALL of these individual MACs show up in the router ARP table when the machine comes up, however after sending a ping to one of them, after a certain expiry or whatever period, the MACs disappear from the router ARP table and only the MAC for e1000g0 shows up. The arp table of the solaris machine however shows all the relevant MACs of each port of the router that it's physically connected to (This is actually a Cisco Switch with the advanced IP services imagine and L3 routing turned on)
Before anyone asks: The setting local-mac-address? setting does NOT exist in my machine and it never has, but it used to work fine. Also, from the ifconfig command, once can tell that all the MAC addresses are fine.
I need to somehow assign all these interfaces equal priority and make them understand that they're physically connected to the 192.168.30.0 network and there's no need to go through e1000g0 to get to it.
This is causing a lot of problems as eventually all traffic will end up going through the e1000g0 interface and that will become a bottle neck.
Please help Thanks in advance

Ok thanks. That was a useful response.
I did think about the trunking software that is claimed to be available for Solaris 8, but it's only available if you've got paid support contract. Oracle came and ruined everything re: Sun support which is so expensive now.
The other confusion is, we never had that OR needed to configure trunking/link aggregation on this machine, so why now?
Lastly, by your explanation, this should be expected and is "normal" behaviour, which would mean that this machine was always doing this and I only just noticed it this time? I thought if you turn off ipv4 forwarding and router function in the machine, it's every interface for itself. But it's not doing that :(
So then the question is, Can I force it? I've tried a bunch of things by manipulating the tables and it seems to mess things up where nothing is getting through or it now shifts all the traffic to some other port make the problem no different
Is there a way to give equal weight to all interfaces for the traffic to go directly through them that is originating at those ports?

Upgrading Solaris OS (9 to 10) in sun cluster 3.1 environment

Hi all ,
I have to upgrade the solaris OS 9 to 10 in Sun cluster 3.1.
Sun Cluster 3.1
data service - Netbackup 5.1
Questions:
1 .Best ways to upgrade the Solaris 9 to 10 and the Problems while upgrading the OS?
2 .Sun Trunking support in Sun Cluster 3.1?
Regards
Ramana

Hi Ramana
We had used the live upgrade for upgrading Solaris 9 to 10 and its the best method for less downtime and risk but you have to follow the proper procedure as it is not the same for normal solaris. Live upgrade with sun cluster is different . you have to take into consideration about global devices and veritas volume manager. while creating new boot environment.
Thanks/Regards
Sadiq

Upgrade solaris from 9 to 10 - Oracle issues?

We are planning to upgrade our Solaris box, running oracle 9.2.0.5,
from solaris 9 (5.9) to 10, this to take advantage of better TCP/IP
stack on Solaris 10 , and the Network trunking feature, multiplexing
network cards to same IP, which is non-standard in Solaris 9.
Our DB does not run in a cluster, and uses local disks only.
any issue we should be aware of? would all our system settings, like
disk, init and /etc/system remain unchanged? any estimate of down time?
I am assuming we would have to shut down oracle while running the
upgrade.
I just read that /etc/system is not supported? what would we have to do instead?
thanks!

You may need to re-link Oracle.

Solaris 10 x86 ipfilter aggr problem

Hi, all.
I have Solaris 10 x86 machine
Kernel Patch: 142910-17
IP patch: 143593-05
The problem shortly:
I am using two network LACP interfaces
aggr125030 contains e1000g1 interface
aggr150031 contains e1000g2 interface
Aggregation 31 was created by:
dladm create-aggr -P L3 -l active -T short -d e1000g2 31
and works fine.
If I add policy based routing rule:
pass out quick on aggr125030 to aggr150031:y.y.y.y proto tcp from x.x.x.x/32 to any port = 25 keep state
traffic matches the rule (it is observed through ipfstat -inohv command) but the rule doesn't work.
How did I decide? I have also ipnat rule
map aggr150031 <skipped>
so if PBR works, the ipnat rule is working too.
If I remove the second aggregation interface aggr150031 and pass the physical interface explicitly, the rule works:
pass out quick on aggr125030 to e1000g2:y.y.y.y proto tcp from x.x.x.x/32 to any port = 25 keep state
as well as the ipnat's one.
x.x.x.x is IP address of e1000g2 interface (or aggr150031)
y.y.y.y is IP address of router for x.x.x.x IP address
It seems that PBR for Ipfilter doesn't support aggregation interfaces for outbound.
Also if you combine vlans 125 and 150 withing one LACP (aggr150031 is replaced by aggr150030 and one physical interface is used for both vlans trunking), the PBR rule doesn't work too.
What shall I do?

The problem was caused by the ipfilter behavior - ignorance of interface alias. My ipnat rule was:
map aggr150031:1 ...
I have changed into:
map aggr150031 ...
and the things began to work.
Sorry for the noise.

Managing ldap sub tree with Solaris Mnagement Console

Hi,
I'm using Sun ONE Directory Server 5.2 in Solaris 9 envronment.
I want to use Solaris Management Console to manage my Ldap Name Service.
On my ldap server I can display two scopes :
Scope 1 file:/example/example
Scope 2 ldap:/example/dc=example,dc=com
With SMC Editor I've created a toolbox to manage my ldap domain and I can manage users and groups only on trunk tree but not on the sub tree.
Does someone can tell me please if it's possible to display the ldap sub tree with SMC and if it's possible to manage other cotainers than people or group containers with SMC (for ex. netgroup container) ?
Thanks.
Dra

By try and error I found out that even when I upgraded my
Sun ONE Directory Server 5.2 to patch level 2, the configuration
in the administration directory was not changed to the new
version. So one couldn't connect with the new console
version 5.2pl2 but used and needed the old one effectively.
To use the 5.2 pl 2 console there need to be the following
files in the client directory:
<root of sun ldap console>/java/jars/
ds522.jar (main console application)
ds522_en.jar (english language resources)
ds522_de.jar (german language resources, in my case, optional)
ds522.icon (icon used in the console)
and for the administration console:
admserv522.jar
admserv522_en.jar
admserv522_de.jar
admserv522.icon
The old file with the '52' in their name may stay where they
are to connect to unpatched 5.2 Servers and 5.2pl2 Servers
without updated configuration.
The configuration is under:
cn=ResourceEditorExtension, ou=4.0, ou=Admin, ou=Global Preferences, ou=zentrale.edekanet.de, o=NetscapeRoot
Search for the attribute 'nsclassname' in all subentries where there
is a substring '@ds52.jar' and change it to '@ds522.jar'.
With newer versions of the Sun Directory Server there are
even jar files with names like 'ds523.jar'. Proceed like above.
After the next start of the console you are using the new 5.2pl2
Versions with all bugfixes and enhancements. To verify you may
move the '52' files away, start and connect. If the directory server
is configured the right way it won't try to download the '52' files
to your local computer.
Frerk

NFS4: Problem mounting NFS mount onto a Solaris 10 Client

Hi,
I am having problems mounting NFS mount point from a Linux-Server onto a Solaris 10 Client.
In the following
=My server IP ..*.120
=Client IP ..*.100
Commands run on Client:
==================
# mount -o vers=3 -F nfs 172.25.30.120:/scratch/pvfs2 /scratch/pvfs2
nfs mount: 172.25.30.120: : RPC: Rpcbind failure - RPC: Unable to receive
nfs mount: retrying: /scratch/pvfs2
nfs mount: 172.25.30.120: : RPC: Rpcbind failure - RPC: Unable to receive
nfs mount: 172.25.30.120: : RPC: Rpcbind failure - RPC: Unable to receive
# mount -o vers=4 -F nfs 172.25.30.120:/scratch/pvfs2 /scratch/pvfs2
nfs mount: 172.25.30.120:/scratch/pvfs2: No such file or directory
# rpcinfo -p
program vers proto port service
100000 4 tcp 111 rpcbind
100000 3 tcp 111 rpcbind
100000 2 tcp 111 rpcbind
100000 4 udp 111 rpcbind
100000 3 udp 111 rpcbind
100000 2 udp 111 rpcbind
1073741824 1 tcp 36084
100024 1 udp 42835 status
100024 1 tcp 36086 status
100133 1 udp 42835
100133 1 tcp 36086
100001 2 udp 42836 rstatd
100001 3 udp 42836 rstatd
100001 4 udp 42836 rstatd
100002 2 tcp 36087 rusersd
100002 3 tcp 36087 rusersd
100002 2 udp 42838 rusersd
100002 3 udp 42838 rusersd
100011 1 udp 42840 rquotad
100021 1 udp 4045 nlockmgr
100021 2 udp 4045 nlockmgr
100021 3 udp 4045 nlockmgr
100021 4 udp 4045 nlockmgr
100021 1 tcp 4045 nlockmgr
100021 2 tcp 4045 nlockmgr
100021 3 tcp 4045 nlockmgr
100021 4 tcp 4045 nlockmgr
# showmount -e 172.25.30.120 (Server)
showmount: 172.25.30.120: RPC: Rpcbind failure - RPC: Unable to receive
Commands OnServer:
================
program vers proto port
100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper
100000 2 udp 111 portmapper
100021 1 tcp 49927 nlockmgr
100021 3 tcp 49927 nlockmgr
100021 4 tcp 49927 nlockmgr
100021 1 udp 32772 nlockmgr
100021 3 udp 32772 nlockmgr
100021 4 udp 32772 nlockmgr
100011 1 udp 796 rquotad
100011 2 udp 796 rquotad
100011 1 tcp 799 rquotad
100011 2 tcp 799 rquotad
100003 2 udp 2049 nfs
100003 3 udp 2049 nfs
100003 4 udp 2049 nfs
100003 2 tcp 2049 nfs
100003 3 tcp 2049 nfs
100003 4 tcp 2049 nfs
100005 1 udp 809 mountd
100005 1 tcp 812 mountd
100005 2 udp 809 mountd
100005 2 tcp 812 mountd
100005 3 udp 809 mountd
100005 3 tcp 812 mountd
100024 1 udp 854 status
100024 1 tcp 857 status
# showmount -e 172.25.30.120
Export list for 172.25.30.120:
/scratch/nfs 172.25.30.100,172.25.24.0/4
/scratch/pvfs2 172.25.30.100,172.25.24.0/4
Thank you, ~al

I also tried to run Snoop on the client and wireshark on Server and following is what I see:
One Server: Upon issuing mount command on client:
# tshark -i eth1
Running as user "root" and group "root". This could be dangerous.
Capturing on eth1
0.000000 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> Spanning-tree-(for-bridges)_00 STP Conf. Root = 32770/00:0a:b8:3d:68:00 Cost = 0 Port = 0x8010
0.205570 172.25.30.100 -> 172.25.30.120 Portmap V2 GETPORT Call MOUNT(100005) V:3 UDP
0.205586 172.25.30.120 -> 172.25.30.100 ICMP Destination unreachable (Port unreachable)
0.207863 172.25.30.100 -> 172.25.30.120 Portmap V2 GETPORT Call MOUNT(100005) V:3 UDP
0.207869 172.25.30.120 -> 172.25.30.100 ICMP Destination unreachable (Port unreachable)
2.005314 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> Spanning-tree-(for-bridges)_00 STP Conf. Root = 32770/00:0a:b8:3d:68:00 Cost = 0 Port = 0x8010
4.011005 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> Spanning-tree-(for-bridges)_00 STP Conf. Root = 32770/00:0a:b8:3d:68:00 Cost = 0 Port = 0x8010
5.206109 Dell_70:ad:29 -> SunMicro_70:ff:17 ARP Who has 172.25.30.100? Tell 172.25.30.120
5.206277 SunMicro_70:ff:17 -> Dell_70:ad:29 ARP 172.25.30.100 is at 00:14:4f:70:ff:17
5.216157 172.25.30.100 -> 172.25.30.120 Portmap V2 GETPORT Call MOUNT(100005) V:3 UDP
5.216170 172.25.30.120 -> 172.25.30.100 ICMP Destination unreachable (Port unreachable)
On Clinet Upon issuing mount command on client:
# snoop -d bge1
Using device /dev/bge1 (promiscuous mode)
? -> * ETHER Type=9000 (Loopback), size = 60 bytes
? -> (multicast) ETHER Type=0000 (LLC/802.3), size = 52 bytes
? -> (multicast) ETHER Type=0000 (LLC/802.3), size = 52 bytes
? -> (multicast) ETHER Type=0000 (LLC/802.3), size = 52 bytes
atlas-pvfs2 -> pvfs2-io-0-3 PORTMAP C GETPORT prog=100005 (MOUNT) vers=3 proto=UDP
pvfs2-io-0-3 -> atlas-pvfs2 ICMP Destination unreachable (UDP port 111 unreachable)
atlas-pvfs2 -> pvfs2-io-0-3 PORTMAP C GETPORT prog=100005 (MOUNT) vers=3 proto=UDP
pvfs2-io-0-3 -> atlas-pvfs2 ICMP Destination unreachable (UDP port 111 unreachable)
? -> (multicast) ETHER Type=0000 (LLC/802.3), size = 52 bytes
? -> (multicast) ETHER Type=0000 (LLC/802.3), size = 52 bytes
? -> * ETHER Type=9000 (Loopback), size = 60 bytes
? -> (multicast) ETHER Type=0000 (LLC/802.3), size = 52 bytes
pvfs2-io-0-3 -> * ARP C Who is 172.25.30.100, atlas-pvfs2 ?
atlas-pvfs2 -> pvfs2-io-0-3 ARP R 172.25.30.100, atlas-pvfs2 is 0:14:4f:70:ff:17
atlas-pvfs2 -> pvfs2-io-0-3 PORTMAP C GETPORT prog=100005 (MOUNT) vers=3 proto=UDP
pvfs2-io-0-3 -> atlas-pvfs2 ICMP Destination unreachable (UDP port 111 unreachable)
Also I see the following on Client:
# rpcinfo -p pvfs2-io-0-3
rpcinfo: can't contact portmapper: RPC: Rpcbind failure - RPC: Failed (unspecified error)
When I try the above rpcinfo command on Client and Server Snoop And wireshark(ethereal) outputs are as follows:
Client # snoop -d bge1
Using device /dev/bge1 (promiscuous mode)
? -> (multicast) ETHER Type=0000 (LLC/802.3), size = 52 bytes
? -> (multicast) ETHER Type=0000 (LLC/802.3), size = 52 bytes
atlas-pvfs2 -> pvfs2-io-0-3 TCP D=111 S=872 Syn Seq=2065245538 Len=0 Win=49640 Options=<mss 1460,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,sackOK>
pvfs2-io-0-3 -> atlas-pvfs2 ICMP Destination unreachable (TCP port 111 unreachable)
? -> (multicast) ETHER Type=0000 (LLC/802.3), size = 52 bytes
? -> (multicast) ETHER Type=0000 (LLC/802.3), size = 52 bytes
? -> (multicast) ETHER Type=2004 (Unknown), size = 48 bytes
? -> (multicast) ETHER Type=0003 (LLC/802.3), size = 90 bytes
? -> (multicast) ETHER Type=0000 (LLC/802.3), size = 52 bytes
? -> * ETHER Type=9000 (Loopback), size = 60 bytes
pvfs2-io-0-3 -> * ARP C Who is 172.25.30.100, atlas-pvfs2 ?
atlas-pvfs2 -> pvfs2-io-0-3 ARP R 172.25.30.100, atlas-pvfs2 is 0:14:4f:70:ff:17
? -> (multicast) ETHER Type=0000 (LLC/802.3), size = 52 bytes
? -> (multicast) ETHER Type=0000 (LLC/802.3), size = 52 bytes
? -> (multicast) ETHER Type=0000 (LLC/802.3), size = 52 bytes
atlas-pvfs2 -> pvfs2-io-0-3 TCP D=111 S=874 Syn Seq=2068043912 Len=0 Win=49640 Options=<mss 1460,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,sackOK>
pvfs2-io-0-3 -> atlas-pvfs2 ICMP Destination unreachable (TCP port 111 unreachable)
? -> (multicast) ETHER Type=0000 (LLC/802.3), size = 52 bytes
? -> (multicast) ETHER Type=0000 (LLC/802.3), size = 52 bytes
? -> * ETHER Type=9000 (Loopback), size = 60 bytes
Server # tshark -i eth1
Running as user "root" and group "root". This could be dangerous.
Capturing on eth1
0.000000 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> Spanning-tree-(for-bridges)_00 STP Conf. Root = 32770/00:0a:b8:3d:68:00 Cost = 0 Port = 0x8010
0.313739 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> CDP/VTP/DTP/PAgP/UDLD CDP Device ID: MILEVA Port ID: GigabitEthernet1/0/16
2.006422 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> Spanning-tree-(for-bridges)_00 STP Conf. Root = 32770/00:0a:b8:3d:68:00 Cost = 0 Port = 0x8010
3.483733 172.25.30.100 -> 172.25.30.120 TCP 865 > sunrpc [SYN] Seq=0 Win=49640 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=0
3.483752 172.25.30.120 -> 172.25.30.100 ICMP Destination unreachable (Port unreachable)
4.009741 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> Spanning-tree-(for-bridges)_00 STP Conf. Root = 32770/00:0a:b8:3d:68:00 Cost = 0 Port = 0x8010
6.014524 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> Spanning-tree-(for-bridges)_00 STP Conf. Root = 32770/00:0a:b8:3d:68:00 Cost = 0 Port = 0x8010
6.551356 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> Cisco_3d:68:10 LOOP Reply
8.019386 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> Spanning-tree-(for-bridges)_00 STP Conf. Root = 32770/00:0a:b8:3d:68:00 Cost = 0 Port = 0x8010
8.484344 Dell_70:ad:29 -> SunMicro_70:ff:17 ARP Who has 172.25.30.100? Tell 172.25.30.120
8.484569 SunMicro_70:ff:17 -> Dell_70:ad:29 ARP 172.25.30.100 is at 00:14:4f:70:ff:17
10.024411 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> Spanning-tree-(for-bridges)_00 STP Conf. Root = 32770/00:0a:b8:3d:68:00 Cost = 0 Port = 0x8010
12.030956 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> Spanning-tree-(for-bridges)_00 STP Conf. Root = 32770/00:0a:b8:3d:68:00 Cost = 0 Port = 0x8010
12.901333 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> CDP/VTP/DTP/PAgP/UDLD DTP Dynamic Trunking Protocol
12.901421 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> CDP/VTP/DTP/PAgP/UDLD DTP Dynamic Trunking Protocol
^[[A 14.034193 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> Spanning-tree-(for-bridges)_00 STP Conf. Root = 32770/00:0a:b8:3d:68:00 Cost = 0 Port = 0x8010
15.691119 172.25.30.100 -> 172.25.30.120 TCP 866 > sunrpc [SYN] Seq=0 Win=49640 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=0
15.691138 172.25.30.120 -> 172.25.30.100 ICMP Destination unreachable (Port unreachable)
16.038944 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> Spanning-tree-(for-bridges)_00 STP Conf. Root = 32770/00:0a:b8:3d:68:00 Cost = 0 Port = 0x8010
16.550760 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> Cisco_3d:68:10 LOOP Reply
18.043886 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> Spanning-tree-(for-bridges)_00 STP Conf. Root = 32770/00:0a:b8:3d:68:00 Cost = 0 Port = 0x8010
20.050243 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> Spanning-tree-(for-bridges)_00 STP Conf. Root = 32770/00:0a:b8:3d:68:00 Cost = 0 Port = 0x8010
21.487689 172.25.30.100 -> 172.25.30.120 TCP 867 > sunrpc [SYN] Seq=0 Win=49640 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=0
21.487700 172.25.30.120 -> 172.25.30.100 ICMP Destination unreachable (Port unreachable)
22.053784 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> Spanning-tree-(for-bridges)_00 STP Conf. Root = 32770/00:0a:b8:3d:68:00 Cost = 0 Port = 0x8010
24.058680 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> Spanning-tree-(for-bridges)_00 STP Conf. Root = 32770/00:0a:b8:3d:68:00 Cost = 0 Port = 0x8010
26.063406 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> Spanning-tree-(for-bridges)_00 STP Conf. Root = 32770/00:0a:b8:3d:68:00 Cost = 0 Port = 0x8010
26.558307 Cisco_3d:68:10 -> Cisco_3d:68:10 LOOP Reply
~thank you for any help you can provide!!!

Configure trunk on a NIC

Hi,
I kind of stuck with this problem.
And I just wante dto know if there is a way to do what i want.
Is there a way to configure trunk on one NIC , the other side will be a cisco switch configure with trunk too??
I want to create on the machine several "vlan interfaces" each for each vlan inside my lab.
Each interface will have a valid IP address.
Can i reach thos address if I will cinfigure trunk on the machine and trunk on the switch???
I hope I wrote my question clearly.
Thanks!

tprizler wrote:
No no no no....
What you have mentioned is aggregation. expanding the link bandwidth using more then one port.
Trunking means , link that can contain 1 or more vlans.In cisco-speak, that's correct. However Sun sold a link-aggregation product as "SunTrunking" for many years (still does), so a great many Solaris admins will use "trunking" as a term for the aggregation concepts.
For example. If i have 2 switches connected to each other via trunk port , they can exchange trafic of several vlans on the same port.
I want to so it when i have switch at one side and a solaris machine on the other..Depends on your hardware and OS. Most interfaces are not 802.1q compliant. What interfaces/hardware do you have?
Most of the solaris docs will reference "VLAN" as a term rather than "trunking". As an example:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-4554/fpden?l=en
Darren

Trunking setup on v240 with bge interfaces

I'm trying to get trunking installed on a v240 with built in nic's. bge0 - 4 to be exact. I'm using trunking 1.3 and I've verified all the packages are installed. I've edited nettr.sh to reflect these cards. I get the following error when I try to run it.
./nettr: Apr 20 12:20:26 me1-backup trslm: NOTICE: trunk link (bge0): DL_NOTIFY_ACK: Aggregation capability not supported: Notifications = 0x11f
ioctl failed: I/O error.
Question: Does trunking 1.3 support bge? The docs seem to indicate it doesn't but I thought I'd ask.
Main Question: Is there something the does support trunking on bge?
Thanks in advance.

My records say that bge is not supported with Sun Trunking, but since it is a gld3 driver, it should be supported by link aggregation on Solaris 10.
Darren

Trunking in Solaris 10

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for