Tunning the query for faster record retrieval

Hi,
I am back, now this time I donot really know in which forum I should post this query, in XML or in Oracle Developers ?
Anyway...
The problem is :
I have a database with millions of record in that, I give a query based on some 4/5 parameters, and retrieve the records corresponding to that, I have added indexes in the database for faster retrieval of the same, but since the no of records returned is quite high and I planned to put a prev and next link to show only 10 records at a time, I had to get the count(*) of the number of records that match, here is the problem, since there are so many records, and count(*) doesn't consider index, it takes nearly 20-30 seconds for the retrieved list to be seen on the browser window, if I just remove that count(*), the retrieval is quite fast, but then there is no prev and next as I had linked them to count(*).
Could some one please let me know the proper way of doing it. I am a newbie to this and I have been doing some trial and error to get my work done.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Shanthi Rajaram

Make sure to select the COUNT() of an indexed column (the more selective the index the better), this way the optimizer can satisfy the count query with a few IO's of the index blocks instead of a full-table scan.

Similar Messages

How to tune the query for duplicate records while joining the two tables

hi,i am executing the query which has retrieving multiple tables,in which one of them has duplicate record,how to get single record

Not enough info...subject says "tune" the query, message says "write" the query...and where is actual query that you had tried ?

Help with rewriting the query for faster execution.

Hello Everybody,
We are on Version
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.5.0 - 64bi
I am trying to get data from tab1 where col8 is equal to ' ' at the same time If we 2 or 3 records matched on col1 and col2 with different dates(col3) i am only interested in getting one record with the least date....
Here is the sample data...
Col1 col2 col3 COL4 COl5 Col6 COL7 COL8 COL9
12 1 17-JAN-13 1 5 7 9 1233333 25
10 2 16-JAN-13 2 5 7 9 1233333 25
10 2 14-JAN-13 2 5 7 9 1233333 25
16 6 16-JAN-13 6 5 7 9 1233333 28
16 6 09-OCT-12 5 5 7 9 1233333 29
16 6 15-JAN-13 6 5 7 9 1233333 28
17 5 09-OCT-12 5 5 7 9 1233333 29
17 5 16-JAN-13 6 5 7 9 1233333 28
17 5 10-OCT-12 5 5 7 9 1233333 29
I am expecting output like this only should pull records...with min or least date
Col1 col2 col3 COL4 COl5 Col6 COL7 COL8 COL9
10 2 14-JAN-13 2 5 7 9 1233333 25
16 6 09-OCT-12 5 5 7 9 1233333 29
17 5 09-OCT-12 5 5 7 9 1233333 29
Below query works and we have close to billion rows in a table but the where clause would filter out to 100 mill records.
and i am trying to see if there is an effecient way of writing this....we have an index on COL3.
Select col1,col2,col3,col4,col5,col6,col7,col8,col9 from(Selct of.,row_number() over (partition by col1,col2 order by col3 asc) as rnk
from tabl of where of.col8 = '1233333') where rnk = 1*
From the above query i get the below explain plan
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1016M| 118G| | 13M (2)| 45:46:43 | | |
|* 1 | VIEW | | 1016M| 118G| | 13M (2)| 45:46:43 | | |
|* 2 | WINDOW SORT PUSHED RANK| | 1016M| 43G| 64G| 13M (2)| 45:46:43 | | |
| 3 | PARTITION LIST SINGLE | | 1016M| 43G| | 1878K (3)| 06:15:47 | 4 | 4 |
| 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TAB1 | 1016M| 43G| | 1878K (3)| 06:15:47 | 4 | 4 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
1 - filter("RNK"=1)
2 - filter(ROW_NUMBER() OVER ( PARTITION BY "COL1","COl2" ORDER BY "COl3")<=1)
17 rows selected
Thanks In Advance!
Edited by: 983949 on Jan 24, 2013 11:50 AM

983949 wrote:
Hello Everybody,
I am trying to get data from tab1 where col8 is equal to ' ' at the same time.
If we 2 or 3 records matched on col1 and col2 with different dates(col3)
i am only interested in getting one record with the least date...
Below query works and we have close to billion rows in a table but the where clause would filter out to 100 mill records.
and i am trying to see if there is an effecient way of writing this....we have an index on COL3.
Select col1,col2,col3,col4,col5,col6,col7,col8,col9
from(Selct of.*,row_number() over (partition by col1,col2 order by col3 asc) as rnk
from tabl of where of.col8 = '1233333') where rnk = 1
Thanks In Advance!How do I ask a question on the forums?
SQL and PL/SQL FAQ

How to tune this query for the improve performance ?

Hi All,
How to tune this query for the improve performance ?
select a.claim_number,a.pay_cd,a.claim_occurrence_number,
case
when sum(case
when a.payment_status_cd ='0'
then a.payment_est_amt
else 0
end
)=0
then 0
else (sum(case
when a.payment_status_cd='0'and a.payment_est_amt > 0
then a.payment_est_amt
else 0
end)
- sum(case
when a.payment_status_cd<>'0'
then a.payment_amt
else 0
end))
end as estimate
from ins_claim_payment a
where a.as_of_date between '31-jan-03' and '30-aug-06'
and ( a.data_source = '25' or (a.data_source between '27' and '29'))
and substr(a.pay_cd,1,1) IN ('2','3','4','8','9')
group by a.claim_number, a.pay_cd, a.claim_occurrence_number
Thank you,
Mcka

Mcka
As well as EXPLAIN PLAN, let us know what proportion of rows are visited by this query. It may be that it is not using a full table scan when it should (or vice versa).
And of course we'd need to know what indexes are available, and how selective they are for the predicated you have in this query ...
Regards Nigel

Guide me to tune the query

Hi All,
I need to tune the query which is taking more than 1 hour to execute over 8 Lakhs of record.
SQL> explain plan for SELECT C.aci_cust_code      cust_code,
2 C.aci_cust_name cust_name,
3      R.NAME ruledefination,
4 B.RULECODE ALERTS,
5 A.custom1 tran_id,
6 TD_get_value('AMLTRANTYPE', RTRIM(A.custom17)) trantype,
7 A.CUSTOM18 tran_nature,
8 A.custom25 tran_date,
9 A.messageno messageno,
10 TD_get_value('AMLTRANSTATUS', A.status) msgstatus,
11 D.acai_acct_type acct_type,
12 A.custom19 acct_number,
13 A.CURRENCY CURRENCY,
14 A.priorityamount amount,
15 A.operator USERNAME,
16 A.msgdb_id msgdb_id,
17 A.msg_mode_in msg_mode_in
18 FROM MSGDB A,
19 MSGALERTS B,
20 AML_CUST_INFO C,
21      AML_CUST_ACC_INFO D,
22 RULETBL2 R,
23           (SELECT tdkey FROM tabledetails WHERE tdidcode = 'AML-INCLUDEQ' ) amlqueues
24 WHERE A.msgdb_id = B.msgdb_id AND
25 A.queueid = amlqueues.tdkey AND
26           A.MSG_MODE_IN = 'AML-TRANS' AND
27 A.custom15 = C.aci_cust_code AND
28 A.CUSTOM19=D.ACAI_ACCT_NUMBER(+) AND
29 TO_CHAR(A.custom25,'YYYYMMDD') BETWEEN
30      TO_CHAR(TO_DATE('2011/01/01','YYYY/MM/DD'),'YYYYMMDD')
31 AND TO_CHAR(TO_DATE('2011/01/31','YYYY/MM/DD'),'YYYYMMDD')
32 AND B.RULECODE = R.RULECODE
33 ORDER BY A.custom25, msgdb_id,B.rulecode;
Explained.
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 1081661146
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 173K| 30M| | 12697 (2)| 00:02:33 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 173K| 30M| 66M| 12697 (2)| 00:02:33 |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 173K| 30M| | 5580 (4)| 00:01:07 |
| 3 | VIEW | index$_join$_005 | 3395 | 81480 | | 42 (3)| 00:00:01 |
|* 4 | HASH JOIN | | | | | | |
| 5 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | IDX_RCODE | 3395 | 81480 | | 10 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | SYS_C0040836 | 3395 | 81480 | | 31 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 7 | HASH JOIN | | 1737 | 276K| | 5534 (4)| 00:01:07 |
|* 8 | HASH JOIN | | 559 | 86645 | | 4575 (3)| 00:00:55 |
|* 9 | HASH JOIN OUTER | | 448 | 56000 | | 4463 (3)| 00:00:54 |
| 10 | NESTED LOOPS | | 448 | 47040 | | 4404 (3)| 00:00:53 |
|* 11 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MSGDB | 451 | 35178 | | 4403 (3)| 00:00:53 |
|* 12 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I_MODEDATE | 2292 | | | 4323 (3)| 00:00:52 |
|* 13 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_TABLEDETAIL | 1 | 27 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 14 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | ACC_NUMBER_TYPE | 58947 | 1151K| | 58 (4)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | AML_CUST_INFO | 18340 | 537K| | 111 (1)| 00:00:02 |
| 16 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | MSGALERTS | 868K| 6782K| | 944 (4)| 00:00:12 |
There is no index on RULECODE of MSGALERTS and RULETBL2 table.
Could yu guys guide me how to tune this query with or without creating any new index.
Thanks,

To emphasise what hoek has said regarding dates, NEVER compare dates with dates by converting them to strings (or numbers). By doing so, you remove vital information from the optimizer.
For example, what is the difference between "31st Dec 2010" and "1st Jan 2011"? Easy, they're dates, that's 1 day.
But what's the difference between "20101231" and "20110101"? Easy: 20110101 - 20101231 = 8870.
That makes the difference between the optimizer guessing 1 row or 8870 rows... a fairly big difference, I think you'll agree, which could well impact on the plan the optimizer chooses.
One other point - leaving the clause as dates gives:
AND    a.custom25 BETWEEN TO_DATE('2011/01/01', 'YYYY/MM/DD')
                      AND TO_DATE('2011/01/31', 'YYYY/MM/DD') which excludes any dates on 31st Jan 2011 except midnight, eg. 10am on 31st Jan 2011 won't be returned by your query.
If you're after rows for a given month, then you could do:
AND    trunc(a.custom25, 'mm') = TO_DATE('01/01/2011', 'dd/mm/yyyy')

Issue While executing the Query for Pagination using ROWNUM with like

Issue While executing the Query for Pagination using ROWNUM with like.
Database is Oracle11G.
Oracle Database Table contains 8-9 lakh records
1) SQL equal (=)
SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(n) */ ROWNUM RNUM, A.* FROM LINE A
WHERE A.REFERENCE = 'KMF22600920'
Execution Time:- 0.00869245 seconds
Returns 2 resultsets
2) SQL like (one %)
SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(n) */ ROWNUM RNUM, A.* FROM LINE A
WHERE A.REFERENCE = 'KMF22600920%'
Execution Time:- 0.01094301 seconds
Returns 2 resultsets
3) SQL like (two%)
SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(n) */ ROWNUM RNUM, A.* FROM LINE A
WHERE A.REFERENCE like '%KMF22600920%'
Execution Time:- 6.43989658 seconds
Returns 2 resultsets
In Pagination, we are using Modified version of SQL Query 3) with ROWNUM as mentioned below :-
4) SELECT * FROM (
SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(n) */ ROWNUM RNUM, A.* FROM LINE A
WHERE REFERENCE like '%KMF22600920%' AND ROWNUM <= 20 ) WHERE RNUM > 0
Execution Time:- Infinite
ResultSets:- No as execution time is infinite
a) Instead of like if we use = in the above query it is returning the 2 resultsets (execution time 0.02699282 seconds)
b) Instead of two % in the above query, if use one example REFERENCE like 'KMF22600920%' it is returning the 2 resultsets (execution time 0.03313019 seconds)
Issue:- When using two % in like in the above query i.e. REFERENCE like '%KMF22600920%' AND ROWNUM <= 20 ) , it is going to infinite.
Could you please let us know what is the issue with two % used in like and rownum
5) Modified version of Option1 query (move out the RNUM condition AND RNUM <= 20)
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(n) */ ROWNUM RNUM, A.* FROM LINE A
WHERE REFERENCE like '%KMF22600920%' ) WHERE RNUM > 0 AND RNUM <= 20
Execution Time:- 7.41368914 seconds
Returns 2 resultsets
Is the above query is best optimized query which should be used for the Pagination or still can improve on this ?

This would be easier to diagnose if there was an explain plan posted for the 'good' and 'bad' queries. Generally speaking using '%' on both sides precludes the use of any indexes.

How to tune the query...?

Hi all,
I am having a table with millions of records and the query is taking hours
time. How to tune the query apart from doing the following things.
1. Creating or Deleting indexes.
2. Using Bind variables.
3. Using Hints.
4. Updating the Statitics regurarly.
Actually, i have asked this question in interview how to tune the query.
I told him the above 4 things. Then he told, these are not working, then
how you will tune this query.
Thanks in advance,
Pal

user546710 wrote:
Actually, i have asked this question in interview how to tune the query.
I told him the above 4 things. Then he told, these are not working, then
how you will tune this query.It actually depends on the scenario/problem given.
You may want to read this first.
When your query takes too long ...
When your query takes too long ...
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting

Undo_tablespace and undo_retetion or tune the query which one to increase

hi all,
In my logs file s
ORA-01555 caused by SQL statement below (SQL ID: 9nc0n06yryhbk, Query Duration=165122 sec, SCN: 0x05ff.062f3363):
Tue Feb 5 02:26:39 2008
SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS */ /*+ ORDERED */ B.GID ,K.ELEMENT_TYPE ,K.DATA_SOURCE_GID ,K.PROD_ID ,K.OPTION_CD ,K.MCC ,K.SPN ,K.REGION_CD ,K.WW_CD ,K.COUNTRY_CD ,K.ERROR ,B.GBATCH_ID
,B.PERIOD_SEQ_NUM ,B.ACTION ,B.ERROR B_ERROR ,B.COST ,B.INPUT_FILE_ROW_NUM ,B.ACTION_STATUS ,B.ACTION_TIMESTAMP FROM T_INPUT_BUCKET B, T_COS_INPUT_KEY K WHERE B.ACTION_STATUS =
'initial' AND B.GINPUT_KEY_ID = K.GID AND B.GBATCH_ID = :B1 AND ROWNUM < 8001
Tue Feb 5 02:35:21 2008
Thread 2 advanced to log sequence 42907
Mon Feb 4 09:10:55 2008
ORA-01555 caused by SQL statement below (SQL ID: 9nc0n06yryhbk, Query Duration=104081 sec, SCN: 0x05ff.05ebc008):
Mon Feb 4 09:10:55 2008
SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS */ /*+ ORDERED */ B.GID ,K.ELEMENT_TYPE ,K.DATA_SOURCE_GID ,K.PROD_ID ,K.OPTION_CD ,K.MCC ,K.SPN ,K.REGION_CD ,K.WW_CD ,K.COUNTRY_CD ,K.ERROR ,B.GBATCH_ID
,B.PERIOD_SEQ_NUM ,B.ACTION ,B.ERROR B_ERROR ,B.COST ,B.INPUT_FILE_ROW_NUM ,B.ACTION_STATUS ,B.ACTION_TIMESTAMP FROM T_INPUT_BUCKET B, T_COS_INPUT_KEY K WHERE B.ACTION_STATUS =
'initial' AND B.GINPUT_KEY_ID = K.GID AND B.GBATCH_ID = :B1 AND ROWNUM < 8001
Mon Feb 4 09:14:08 2008
===============================================
and my undo_retention
Current usage:
UNDO_01 96736 11596 12 88
UNDO_02 96736 9357 10 90
NAME TYPE VALUE
undo_management string AUTO
undo_retention integer 36000
can anyone please guide me which one is best to increase undo_retention or undo_tablespace
or tune the query?
my database version is
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
"CORE 10.2.0.2.0 Production"
TNS for HPUX: Version 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
thanks in advance

IMO best is to
1) tune the query to minimize time and resource use;
2) set the undo_retention to size the undo tablespace for the required 'consistent read' rebuild requirements;
3) set the retention guarantee appropriately
4) size the undo tablespace based on the required size, probably dictated by 2)
Why is this an 'either one or other' question? When driving a car and looking for best fuel efficiency, you tune up the car, drive properly AND use the right fuel. You don't just pick one and leave it at that.

How to tune the query and difference between CBO AND RBO.. Which is good

Hello Friends,
Here are some questions I have pls reply back with complete description and url if any ..
1)How Did you tune Query,
2)What approach you take to tune query? Do you use Hints?
3)Where did you tune the query and what are the issue with query?
4)What is difference between RBO and CBO? where u use RBO and CBO.
5)Give some information about hash join?
6) Using explain plan how do u know where the bottle neck in query .. how u will identify where the bottle neck is from explain plan .
thanks/Kumar

Hi,
kumar73 wrote:
Hello Friends,
Here are some questions I have pls reply back with complete description and url if any ..
1)How Did you tune Query, Use EXPLAIN PLAN to see exactly where it is spending its time, and address those areas.
See the forum FAQ
SQL and PL/SQL FAQ
"3. How to improve the performance of my query?"
2)What approach you take to tune query? Do you use Hints?Hints can help.
Even more helpful is writing the SQL efficiently (avoiding multiple scans of the same table, filtering early, using built-in rather than user-defined functions, ...), creating and using indexes, and, for large tables, partitioning.
Table design can have a big impact on performace.
Look for ways to do part of what you need before the query. This includes denormalizing (when appropriate), the kind of pre-digesting that often takes place in data warehouses, function-based indexes, and, starting in Oracle 11, virtual columns.
3)Where did you tune the query and what are the issue with query?Either this question is a vague summary of the entire thread, or I don't understand it. Can you re-phrase this part?
4)What is difference between RBO and CBO? where u use RBO and CBO.Basically, use RBO if you have Oracle 7 or earlier.

What is the query for Accounts Payable Trial Balance (APXTRBAL) in 11.5.10?

Hi Guys,
What is the query for Accounts Payable Trial Balance (APXTRBAL) in 11.5.10?
I have to write an AP Invoice Aging Report in Discoverer to show all unpaid invoices that have been transferred into GL... Business wants it to match one-to-one with the AP Trial Balance standard report...
Business wants to run the report for any date in a past...
The report has two parameters:
As Of Date - the same as As of Date for the AP Trial Report
Trial Balance Run Date - the date when Trial Balance was run...
Conditions are:
TRUNC(Invoice Date) <=TRUNC(NVL(TO_DATE(:As Of Date),SYSDATE))
TRUNC(NVL(Payment Date,'01-JAN-5000')) > TRUNC(NVL(TO_DATE(:As Of Date),SYSDATE))
TRUNC(Invoice Creation Date) <= TRUNC(NVL(TO_DATE(:Trial Balance Run Date),SYSDATE))
Distr Accounting Date <= TRUNC(NVL(TO_DATE(:As Of Date),SYSDATE))
NVL(Distr Creation Date,Invoice Creation Date) <= TRUNC(NVL(TO_DATE(:Trial Balance Run Date),SYSDATE))
Show_Flag = 'YES', where:
Show_Flag = CASE WHEN ( NVL(Cancelled Date,'01-JAN-1901') > NVL(:As Of Date,SYSDATE) AND NVL(Inv Amount Aud,0) = 0 ) THEN 'YES' ELSE ( CASE WHEN NVL(Inv Amount Aud,0) = 0 THEN 'NO' ELSE 'YES' END ) END
There is a difference between the logic of my report, and the logic of AP Trial Balance...
Could you please advise what I'm missing?
Thanks,
Iana

What is the query for Accounts Payable Trial Balance (APXTRBAL) in 11.5.10? You can get the code by opening the report in Reports Builder and get the query.
Or, enable trace/debug as per (FAQ: Common Tracing Techniques within the Oracle Applications 11i/R12 [ID 296559.1]).
Thanks,
Hussein

Query for getting records max reported timestamp and 2nd max report

query for getting records in between
max reported timestamp and 2nd max reported timestamp
HERE IS ALL RESULT SET
TIME DOMAIN
30:jun:2006:20:08:45 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:08:45 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:04 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:04 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:24 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:24 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:45 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:45 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:08:05 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:04 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:08:05 TOMCAT
PD_REPORTED_TIMESTAM PD_USER
30:jun:2006:20:08:25 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:08:25 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:08:45 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:08:45 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:24 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:04 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:24 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:45 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:07:45 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:08:05 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:08:05 TOMCAT
PD_REPORTED_TIMESTAM PD_USER
30:jun:2006:20:08:25 TOMCAT
30:jun:2006:20:08:25 TOMCAT
QUERY RESULT TO COME
TIME DOMAIN
TOMCAT 30:jun:2006:20:08:45
TOMCAT 30:jun:2006:20:08:45
TOMCAT 30:jun:2006:20:08:45
TOMCAT 30:jun:2006:20:08:45
Message was edited by:
user517983

Hi,
can we write query like this.
1 select pd_user,PD_REPORTED_TIMESTAMP
2 from sp_process_detail_current spdc
3 where host_id='DSCP02469'and pd_user='TOMCAT'
4 and exists(
5 select PD_REPORTED_TIMESTAMP from sp_process_detail_current
6* having max(PD_REPORTED_TIMESTAMP)-spdc.PD_REPORTED_TIMESTAMP=0)
SQL> /
PD_USER PD_REPORTED_TIMESTAM
TOMCAT 30:jun:2006:20:08:45
TOMCAT 30:jun:2006:20:08:45
TOMCAT 30:jun:2006:20:08:45
TOMCAT 30:jun:2006:20:08:45

Some of the data for same records is going on to the next page in excel??

Hello,
I designed a template in word with page setup orientation to Landscape, to get the Excel report output. Later when i preview the same in Excel with the Landscape page setup..the print preview is showing me with some of the data going out of the page set up.My font size for data in word I put is 8pt Times New Roman.
Basically..my requirement is to print the report in excel with the landscape page setup.
But some of the data for same records is going on to the next page in excel??
How do i prevent this from happening?
Thanks in Advance!

Hello
The blog suggested above is to set the output for a PDF document using RTF template. Whereas, my requirement is to get a excel output using RTF template, with data fitting directly with in the landscape orientation of EXCEL when printed.
Basically, the requirement is : When i run the report, the excel output should be sent to a printer with style 'Landscape' from apps?? But the problem is that i am not getting all the pagebreaks i put in the RTF template and also some of the data for the same records is not fitting in to the landscape orientation of the excel while it gets printed.
But when i run the same as a PDF everything is fine... ..But that's not my requirement...Please help!
Thanks,

Optimize The PDF For Fast Web View

Am wondering: is there any difference in quality when "Optimize The PDF For Fast Web View" is UNtagged?
I know the files may be bigger when this option is untagged, but that aside.
If, in day to day use, there is hardly/or no visible quality difference what is the use of this option?
Thanks
=
Acrobat XI Pro/Windows

Thanks a lot, I will leave that option tagged in future.
The below is comparing print PDF source files to -again- PDF whilst leaving that option un-tagged.
Didn't 'test' it whilst having that option tagged though.
=
You might wonder why PDF to PDF.
I could not get the files OCR'ed by Acrobat (magazines). No way. Tried a couple of times.
However, I discovered - when printing them to PDF -again- then text recognition works.
=

Can anyone share the query for inventory aging report

Is there any standard reports for inventory aging in oracle ebs 12.1.3 ....... If not can anyone share the query for inventory aging report

Hi,
It may not be so simple as you are trying to reproduce the historical value. I believe you have to create a temporary table first. Or you may use Command feather to get the required data in advance.
Thanks,
Gordon

What will be the query for the below stated problem..??

Dear Sir
I want that in Incoming payment after selecting a Customer when we right click and select payment means under checks tab the bank details of that customer should be there i.e. According to Bank Code its Branch and Account no be shown with the help of a query. If anyone knows the query for this please let me know...

Hello jyotasna ,
Let me try explain
SAP Process :-
When you make incoming payment with Cheque or bank then this is not complete sale cycle.
Bank Offset Account Debit
Customer Account Credit
You should make deposit(Banking>Incoming Payment>Deposit) for which you have made incoming payment.and here we put all info for bank account
Bank Account Debit
Bank Offset account Credit
Why :-
Suppose your client said that he deposit your cheque in bank in this date but due same bake issue or cheque issue the same cheque deposited in next day.
In this senario if i made this entry in SAP then we need to modify it based on Bank Reconciliation Statement(BRS)
We also have bank reconciliation set for same
Is there any confusion ?
Thanks
Manvendra Singh Niranjan
Edited by: Manvendra Singh Niranjan on Jul 13, 2011 1:10 PM

Tunning the query for faster record retrieval

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for