UCCX 7 applications take too long to be triggered

Hi all,
I am having a uccx cluster with a couple of scripts in it. Every thing used to work fine but now i am having two problems :
1- My script apllications take to long to be triggered. I mean when I call the jtapi trigger of my application it rings up to 10 seconds before getting my application triggered
2- I created new applications with new jtapi trigger but I am failing to get my CTI route point registered with CCM.
Please advise.
Best Regards

I have the same problem as decribe in 1. Its begin after CCM cluster hang up and was rebooted. I tried JTAPI resync, it's not help for me. I also tried install last update on CCX, but it's not help .When I opened Real Time Monitoring tool and chose Report - Contacts, I see what my call appears here quickly but in Task fild value appears only after some time. Time is different, sometimes it's 1 sec, but sometimes it's reach 20 sec. Is the problem in CCX or in CCM, what you think?

Similar Messages

Web application deployment takes too long?

Hi All,
We have a wls 10.3.5 clustering environment with one admin server and two managered servers separately. When we try to deploy a sizable web application, it takes about 1 hour to finish. It seems that it takes too long to finish the deployment. Here is the output from one of two managerd server system log. Could anyone tell me it is normal or not? If not, how can I improve this?
Thanks in advance,
John
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:03 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535463373> <BEA-149059> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] is transitioning from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:05 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <9baa7a67b5727417:26f76f6c:135ca05cff2:-8000-00000000000000b0> <1330535465664> <BEA-149060> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] successfully transitioned from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:06 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535466493> <BEA-149059> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] is transitioning from STATE_PREPARED to STATE_ADMIN on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:06 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535466493> <BEA-149060> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] successfully transitioned from STATE_PREPARED to STATE_ADMIN on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:06 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535466809> <BEA-149059> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] is transitioning from STATE_ADMIN to STATE_ACTIVE on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 12:11:06 PM EST> <Info> <Deployer> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330535466809> <BEA-149060> <Module copyrequest of application copyrequest [Version=COPYREQUEST0002bb] successfully transitioned from STATE_ADMIN to STATE_ACTIVE on server Pinellas1tMS3.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442300> <BEA-320143> <Scheduled 1 data retirement tasks as per configuration.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442301> <BEA-320144> <Size based data retirement operation started on archive HarvestedDataArchive>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442301> <BEA-320145> <Size based data retirement operation completed on archive HarvestedDataArchive. Retired 0 records in 0 ms.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442301> <BEA-320144> <Size based data retirement operation started on archive EventsDataArchive>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:00:42 PM EST> <Info> <Diagnostics> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330538442301> <BEA-320145> <Size based data retirement operation completed on archive EventsDataArchive. Retired 0 records in 0 ms.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:10:23 PM EST> <Info> <Cluster> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <weblogic.cluster.MessageReceiver> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330539023098> <BEA-003107> <Lost 2 unicast message(s).>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:10:36 PM EST> <Info> <Cluster> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '2' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330539036105> <BEA-000111> <Adding Pinellas1tMS2 with ID -9071779833610528123S:entwl2t-vm:[7005,7005,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:entwl2t-vm:7005,entwl3t-vm:7007:Pinellas1tDomain:Pinellas1tMS2 to cluster: Pinellas1tCluster1 view.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:11:24 PM EST> <Info> <Cluster> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[STANDBY] ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330539084375> <BEA-000128> <Updating -9071779833610528123S:entwl2t-vm:[7005,7005,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:entwl2t-vm:7005,entwl3t-vm:7007:Pinellas1tDomain:Pinellas1tMS2 in the cluster.>+
+####<Feb 29, 2012 1:11:24 PM EST> <Info> <Cluster> <entwl3t-vm.co.pinellas.fl.us> <Pinellas1tMS3> <[STANDBY] ExecuteThread: '4' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1330539084507> <BEA-000128> <Updating -9071779833610528123S:entwl2t-vm:[7005,7005,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:entwl2t-vm:7005,entwl3t-vm:7007:Pinellas1tDomain:Pinellas1tMS2 in the cluster.>+
Edited by: john wang on Feb 29, 2012 10:36 AM
Edited by: john wang on Feb 29, 2012 10:37 AM
Edited by: john wang on Feb 29, 2012 10:38 AM

Hi John,
There may be some circumstances like when there are many files in the WEB-INF folder and JPS don't use TLD.
I don't think a 1hour deployment is normal, it should be much more faster.
Since you are using 10.3.5, I suggesto you to install the corresponding patch:
1. Download patch 10118941p10118941_1035_Generic.zip
2. Uncompress the file p10118941_1035_Generic.zip
3. Copy the required files (patch-catalog_XXXXX.xml, CIRF.jar ) to the Patch Download Directory (typically, this folder is <WEBLOGIC_HOME>/utils/bsu/cache_dir).
4. Rename the file patch-catalog_XXXXX.xml into patch-catalog.xml .
5. Start Smart Update from <WEBLOGIC_HOME>/utils/bsu/bsu.sh .
6. Select "Work Offline" mode.
7. Go to File->Preferences, and select "Patch Download Directory".
8. Click "Manage Patches" on the right panel.
9. You will see the patch in the panel below (Downloaded Patches)
10. Click "Apply button" of the downloaded patch to apply it to the target installation and follow the instructions on the screen.
11. Add "-Dweblogic.jsp.ignoreTLDsProcessingInWebApp=true" to the Java options to ignore additional findTLDs cost.
12. Restart servers.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Cris

Query designer takes too long to save a query

Hi dear SDN friends.
I´m working with query designer in BI 7 and sometimes it takes too long to save a query, about ten minutes. Sometimes it never ends saving and some other times it saves the same query in 1 minute.
Can anybody please give an advice about this behavior of the query designer?
We have recently update BI to sp18. In query designer I have sp5 revision 529
Best regards,
Karim Reyes

Hello Karim,
I would suggest testing this again in the latest Frontend Patch available (FEP 602). In FEPs 600, 601, & 602 there were some performance and stability improvements made which may correct your issue. If the issue persists, I would suggest then opening a Customer Message via Service Marketplace.
It can be downloaded from:
http://service.sap.com/swdc
u2192Download
u2192Support Packages and Patches
u2192Entry by Application Group
u2192SAP Frontend Components
u2192BI ADDON FOR SAPGUI
u2192 BI 7.0 ADDON FOR SAPGUI 7.10
u2192 BI 7.0 ADDON FOR SAPGUI 7.10
u2192Win32
See SAP Note 1085218 for planned FEP releases.
I hope that helps.
Regards,
Tanner Spaulding
SAP NetWeaver RIG Americas, BI

Displaying PathGeometry into canvas take too long time

Hi every one,
I am working on spatial data with an application WPF and I would like to draw a map from data queries.
I got my data and I am able to draw them on a canvas with scroll bar and zoom.
My problem is when I want to zoom or scroll the canvas take a long time before draw the map.
The big problem is there :
Dim poly As New Polygon
poly.Stroke = Brushes.Red
poly.Fill = Brushes.Orange
poly.StrokeThickness = 5
Dim colPoint As New PointCollection
For i = 1 To geo.STNumPoints
Dim ls As New LineSegment()
colPoint.Add(New Point(geo.STPointN(i).STX.Value - extentA, geo.STPointN(i).STY.Value - extentB))
Next
colPoint.Add(New Point(geo.STPointN(1).STX.Value - extentA, geo.STPointN(1).STY.Value - extentB))
poly.Points = colPoint
masterCanvas.Children.Add(poly)
so the canvas is "masterCanvas" and i add each Polygon one by one. I would like if it is possible to gather all polygon into one "image" and then when it will refresh the canvas it will draw only one thing.
Regards.

Hi,
I found that you have posted it in the forum Acamar suggested.
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/e2d50b4e-0d76-4a3c-b229-521b648b54b3/displaying-pathgeometry-into-canvas-take-too-long-time?forum=wpf#e2d50b4e-0d76-4a3c-b229-521b648b54b3
Please just focus on that thread, and you could mark if any reply which is helpful as answer.
Thanks for your understanding.
Regards.
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Business Rules Project Takes Too Long to Open

Does anyone know why it takes too long (~3-5 minutes) to open/edit a security project definded for assigning business rules to planning application forms? We are using Hyperion v11.1.1.3.0. Essbase is on Windows server, Shared Services on Solaris 10 Unix. Even before we migrated Essbase to Windows to gain better performance running calcs, opening projects using EAS has always been very slow to open. Please advice if there is a way to improve performance on this.

Clear Cookies & Cache
* https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Template:clearCookiesCache
Clear the Network Cache
* https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/How%20to%20clear%20the%20cache#w_clear-the-cache
Firefox takes a long time to start up
* https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/firefox-takes-long-time-start-up
Check and tell if its working.

OIM11g managed server startup takes too long

I am running a OIM11g managed server using weblogic on windows xp; in development mode
My managed server takes too long to startup; averaging atleast an hour at the minimum.
I am attaching the logs from the server between the time frame when it took the longest time.
Can someone please help me to improve the startup.
Edited by: 838243 on Feb 20, 2011 10:22 AM

<9:32:14 PM> <Info> <EJB><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-010008> <EJB Deploying file: iam-ejb.jar>
<9:45:06 PM> <Info> <JDBC><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '23' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-001128> <Connection for pool "mds-oim" closed.>
<9:45:07 PM> <Info> <Common><oim1> <MDSPollingThread-[oim, jdbc/mds/MDS_REPOS]> <anonymous> <BEA-000628> <Created "1" resources for pool "mds-oim", out of which "1" are available and "0" are unavailable.>
<10:00:06 PM> <Info> <JDBC><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '14' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-001128> <Connection for pool "mds-oim" closed.>
<10:00:07 PM> <Info> <Common><oim1> <MDSPollingThread-[oim, jdbc/mds/MDS_REPOS]> <anonymous> <BEA-000628> <Created "1" resources for pool "mds-oim", out of which "1" are available and "0" are unavailable.>
<10:15:11 PM> <Info> <JDBC><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '14' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-001128> <Connection for pool "mds-oim" closed.>
<10:15:41 PM> <Info> <Common><oim1> <MDSPollingThread-[oim, jdbc/mds/MDS_REPOS]> <anonymous> <BEA-000628> <Created "1" resources for pool "mds-oim", out of which "1" are available and "0" are unavailable.>
<10:30:11 PM> <Info> <JDBC><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '19' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-001128> <Connection for pool "mds-oim" closed.>
<10:30:15 PM> <Info> <Common><oim1> <MDSPollingThread-[oim, jdbc/mds/MDS_REPOS]> <anonymous> <BEA-000628> <Created "1" resources for pool "mds-oim", out of which "1" are available and "0" are unavailable.>
<10:32:44 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149060> <Module iam-ejb.jar of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] successfully transitioned from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
<10:32:44 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149059> <Module dataobjects-ejb.jar of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] is transitioning from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
<10:33:08 PM> <Info> <J2EE><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-160166> <References were found in deployment plan for module 'dataobjects-ejb.jar' with uri, 'META-INF/weblogic-ejb-jar.xml'. The plan was merged.>
<10:33:14 PM> <Info> <EJB><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-010008> <EJB Deploying file: dataobjects-ejb.jar>
<10:38:10 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149060> <Module dataobjects-ejb.jar of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] successfully transitioned from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
<10:38:10 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149059> <Module iam-async-mdb.jar of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] is transitioning from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
<10:38:10 PM> <Info> <J2EE><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-160166> <References were found in deployment plan for module 'iam-async-mdb.jar' with uri, 'META-INF/ejb-jar.xml'. The plan was merged.>
<10:38:11 PM> <Info> <J2EE><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-160166> <References were found in deployment plan for module 'iam-async-mdb.jar' with uri, 'META-INF/weblogic-ejb-jar.xml'. The plan was merged.>
<10:38:11 PM> <Info> <EJB><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-010008> <EJB Deploying file: iam-async-mdb.jar>
<10:38:13 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149060> <Module iam-async-mdb.jar of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] successfully transitioned from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
<10:38:13 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149059> <Module xlWebApp of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] is transitioning from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
<10:38:13 PM> <Info> <J2EE><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-160166> <References were found in deployment plan for module 'xlWebApp.war' with uri, 'WEB-INF/web.xml'. The plan was merged.>
Edited by: 838243 on Feb 20, 2011 10:22 AM

Why finding replication stream matchpoint takes too long

hi,
I am using bdb je 5.0.58 HA(two nodes group,JVM 6G for each node).
Sometimes, I found bdb node takes too long to restart(about 2 hours).
When this occurs, I catch the process stack of bdb(jvm process) by jstack.
After analyzing stack,I found "ReplicaFeederSyncup.findMatchpoint()" taking all the time.
I want to know why this method takes so much time,and how can I avoid this bad case.
Thanks.
帖子经 liang_mic编辑过

Liang,
2 hours is indeed a huge amount of time for a node restart. It's hard be sure without doing more detailed analysis of your log as to what may be going wrong, but I do wonder if it is related to the problem you reported in outOfMemory error presents when cleaner occurs [#21786]. Perhaps the best approach is for me to describe in more detail what happens when a replicated node is connecting with a new master, which might give you more insight into what is happening in your case.
The members of a BDB JE HA replication group share the same logical stream of replicated records, where each record is identified with a virtual log sequence number, or VLSN. In other words, the log record described by VLSN x on any node is the same data record, although it may be stored in a physically different place in the log of each node.
When a replica in a group connects with a master, it must find a common point, the matchpoint, in that replication stream. There are different situations in which a replica may connect with a master. For example, it may have come up and just joined the group. Another case is when the replica is up already but a new master has been elected for the group. One way or another, the replica wants to find the most recent point in its log, which it has in common with the log of the master. Only certain kinds of log entries, tagged with timestamps, are eligible to be used for such a match, and usually, these are transaction commits and aborts.
Now, in your previous forum posting, you reported an OOME because of a very large transaction, so this syncup issue at first seems like it might be related. Perhaps your replication nodes need to traverse a great many records, in an incomplete transaction, to find the match point. But the syncup code does not blindly traverse all records, it uses the vlsn index metadata to skip to the optimal locations. In this case, even if the last transaction was very long, and incomplete, it should know where the previous transaction end was, and find that location directly, without having to do a scan.
As a possible related note, I did wonder if something was unusual about your vlsn index metadata. I did not explain this in outOfMemory error presents when cleaner occurs but I later calculated that the transaction which caused the OOME should only have contained 1500 records. I think that you said that you figured out that you were deleting about 15 million records, and you figured out that it was the vlsn index update transaction which was holding many locks. But because the vlsn index does not record every single record, it should only take about 1,500 metadata records in the vlsn index to cover 15 million application data records. It is still a bug in our code to update that many records in a single transaction, but the OOME was surprising, because 1,500 locks shouldn't be catastrophic.
There are a number of ways to investigate this further.
- You may want to try using a SyncupProgress listener described at http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17277_02/html/java/com/sleepycat/je/rep/SyncupProgress.html to get more information on which part of the syncup process is taking a long time.
- If that confirms that finding the matchpoint is the problem, we have an unadvertised utility, meant for debugging, to examine the vlsn index. The usage is as follows, and you would use the -dumpVLSN option, and run thsi on the replica node. But this would require our assistance to interpret the results. We would be looking for the records that mention where "sync" points are, and would correlate that to the replica's log, and that might give more information if this is indeed the problem, and why the vlsn index was not acting to optimize the search.
$ java -jar build/lib/je.jar DbStreamVerify
usage: java { com.sleepycat.je.rep.utilint.DbStreamVerify | -jar je-<version>.jar DbStreamVerify }
-h <dir> # environment home directory
-s <hex> # start file
-e <hex> # end file
-verifyStream # check that replication stream is ascending
-dumpVLSN # scan log file for log entries that make up the VLSN index, don't run verify.
-dumpRepGroup # scan log file for log entries that make up the rep group db, don't run verify.
-i # show invisible. If true, print invisible entries when running verify mode.
-v # verbose

Sometimes my computer takes too long to connect to new website. I am running a pretty powerful work program at same time, what is the best solution? Upgrading speed from cable network, is it a hard drive issue? do I need to "clean out" the computer?

Many times my computer takes too long to connect to new website. I have wireless internet (time capsule) and I am running a pretty powerful real time financial work program at same time, what is the best solution? Upgrading speed from cable network? is it a hard drive issue? do I only need to "clean out" the computer? Or all of the above...not to computer saavy. It is a Macbook Pro osx 10.6.8 (late 2010).

Almost certainly none of the above! Try each of the following in this order:
Select 'Reset Safari' from the Safari menu.
Close down Safari; move <home>/Library/Caches/com.apple.Safari/Cache.db to the trash; restart Safari.
Change the DNS servers in your network settings to use the OpenDNS servers: 208.67.222.222 and 208.67.220.220
Turn off DNS pre-fetching by entering the following command in Terminal and restarting Safari:
defaults write com.apple.safari WebKitDNSPrefetchingEnabled -boolean false

Accessing BKPF table takes too long

Hi,
Is there another way to have a faster and more optimized sql query that will access the table BKPF? Or other smaller tables that contain the same data?
I'm using this:
   select bukrs gjahr belnr budat blart
   into corresponding fields of table i_bkpf
   from bkpf
   where bukrs eq pa_bukrs
   and gjahr eq pa_gjahr
   and blart in so_DocTypes
   and monat in so_monat.
The report is taking too long and is eating up a lot of resources.
Any helpful advice is highly appreciated. Thanks!

Hi max,
I also tried using BUDAT in the where clause of my sql statement, but even that takes too long.
    select bukrs gjahr belnr budat blart monat
     appending corresponding fields of table i_bkpf
     from bkpf
     where bukrs eq pa_bukrs
     and gjahr eq pa_gjahr
     and blart in so_DocTypes
     and budat in so_budat.
I also tried accessing the table per day, but it didn't worked too...
   while so_budat-low le so_budat-high.
     select bukrs gjahr belnr budat blart monat
     appending corresponding fields of table i_bkpf
     from bkpf
     where bukrs eq pa_bukrs
     and gjahr eq pa_gjahr
     and blart in so_DocTypes
     and budat eq so_budat-low.
     so_budat-low = so_budat-low + 1.
   endwhile.
I think our BKPF tables contains a very large set of data. Is there any other table besides BKPF where we could get all accounting document numbers in a given period?

Report Takes Too Long Time

Hi!
I am in troubble
following is the query
SELECT inv_no, inv_name, inv_desc, i.cat_id, cat_name, i.sub_cat_id,
sub_cat_name, asset_cost, del_date, i.bl_id, gen_desc bl_desc, p.prvcode, prvdesc, cur_loc,
pldesc, i.pmempno, pmname, i.empid, empname
FROM inv_reg i,
cat_reg c,
sub_cat_reg s,
gen_desc_reg g,
ploc p,
province r,
pmaster m,
iemp_reg e
WHERE i.sub_cat_id = s.sub_cat_id
AND i.cat_id = s.cat_id
AND s.cat_id = c.cat_id
AND i.bl_id = g.gen_id
AND i.cur_loc = p.plcode
AND p.prvcode = r.prvcode
AND i.pmempno = m.pmempno(+)
AND i.empid = e.empid(+)
&wc
order by prvdesc, pldesc, cat_name, sub_cat_name, inv_no
and this query returns 32000 records
when i run this query on reports 10g
then it takes 10 to 20 minuts to generate report
how can i optimize it...?

Hi Waqas Attari
Pls study & try this ....
When your query takes too long ...
hope it helps....
Regards,
Abdetu...

OPM process execution process parameters takes too long time to complete

PROCESS_PARAMETERS are inserted every 15 min. using gme_api_pub packages. some times it takes too long time to complete the batch ,ie completion of request. it takes about 5-6 hrs long time ,in other time s it takes only 15-20 mins.This happens at regular interval...if anybody can guide me I will be thankful to him/her..
thanks in advance.
regds,
Shailesh

Generally the slowest part of the process is in the extraction itself...
Check in your source system and see how long the processes are taking, if there are delays, locks or dumps in the database... If your source is R/3 or ECC transactions like SM37, SM21, ST22 can help monitor this activity...
Consider running less processes in parallel if you have too many and see some delays in jobs... Also indexing some of the tables in the source system to expedite the extraction, make sure there are no heavy processes or interfaces running in the source system at the same time you're trying to load... Check with your Basis guys for activity peaks and plan accordingly...
In BW also check in your SM21 for database errors or delays...
Just some ideas...

RPURMP00 program takes too long

Hi Guys,
Need some help on this one guys. Not getting any where with this issue.
I am running RPURMP00 ( Program to Create Third-Party Remittance Posting Run ) and while running it in test mode for 1 employee it takes too long .
I ran this in background during off hours , but it takes 19,000 + sec to run and then cancels .
The long text message is No entry in table T51R6_FUNDINFO (Remittance detail table for all entities) for key 0002485844    and     Job cancelled after system exception ERROR_MESSAGE
I check the program and I found a nested loop within the program (include RPURMP02 ) and decided to debug it with a break point.
It short dumped and here is the st22 message and source code extract.
      ----Message -
" Time limit exceeded ".
"The program "RPURMP00" has exceeded the maximum permitted runtime without
Interruption and has therefore been terminated."
      ----Source code extract -
Include RPURMP02
172 &----
173 *&      Form get_advice_info
174 &----
175 *       text
176 ----
177 * --> p1        text
178 * <-- p2        text
179 ----
180 FORM get_advice_info .
181
182 * get information for advice form only if vendor sub-group and
183 * employee detail is maintained
184   IF ( NOT t51rh-lifsg IS INITIAL ) AND
185      ( NOT t51rh-hrper IS INITIAL ).
186
187 *   get remittance items employee number
188     SELECT * FROM t51r4 WHERE remky = t51r5-remky. "#EC CI_GENBUFF "SAM0632658
189 *     get payroll seqno determined by PERNR and RDATN
>>>>>       SELECT * FROM t51r8 WHERE pernr = t51r4-pernr
191                             AND rdatn = t51r5-rdatn
192                             ORDER BY PRIMARY KEY. "#EC CI_GENBUFF
193         EXIT.
194       ENDSELECT.
Has anyone ever come across this situation? Any input from anyone on this?
Regards.
CJ

Hi,
What is your SAP version?
Have you checked if some OSS notes is there on performance.
Regards,
Atish

AME CS6 rendering with AE and Pr takes too long

Hi Guys,
Need some help here. i have rendered a 30 secs mp4 video with 1920 x 1080 HD format 25 frames w/o scripting in AME for 4 hours!
Why does it take too long? I have rendered a 2 minute video with same format w/ scripting but only spare less than 30 minutes for rendering.
Im using After Effects and Premium Pro both CS6 and using Dynamic Link in AME.
What seems to be wrong in my current settings?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks!

This may be a waste of time, but it won't take a minute and is something you should always do whenever things go strangely wrong ............ trash the preferences, assuming you haven't done it already.
Many weird things happen as a result of corrupt preferences which can create a vast range of different symptoms, so whenever FCP X stops working properly in any way, trashing the preferences should be the first thing you do using this free app.
http://www.digitalrebellion.com/prefman/
Shut down FCP X, open PreferenceManager and in the window that appears:-
1. Ensure that only FCP X is selected.
2. Click Trash
The job is done instantly and you can re-open FCP X.
There is absolutely no danger in trashing preferences and you can do it as often as you like.
The preferences are kept separately from FCP X and if there aren't any when FCP X opens it automatically creates new ones . . . instantly.

My Query takes too long ...

Hi ,
Env   , DB 10G , O/S Linux Redhat , My DB size is about 80G
My query takes too long , about 5 days to get results , can you please help to rewrite this query in a better way ,
declare
x number;
y date;
START_DATE DATE;
MDN VARCHAR2(12);
TOPUP VARCHAR2(50);
begin
for first_bundle in
select min(date_time_of_event) date_time_of_event ,account_identifier ,top_up_profile_name
from bundlepur
where account_profile='Basic'
AND account_identifier='665004664'
and in_service_result_indicator=0
and network_cause_result_indicator=0
and   DATE_TIME_OF_EVENT >= to_date('16/07/2013','dd/mm/yyyy')
group by account_identifier,top_up_profile_name
order by date_time_of_event
loop
select sum(units_per_tariff_rum2) ,max(date_time_of_event)
into x,y
from OLD_LTE_CDR
where account_identifier=(select first_bundle.account_identifier from dual)
and date_time_of_event >= (select first_bundle.date_time_of_event from dual)
and -- no more than a month
date_time_of_event < ( select add_months(first_bundle.date_time_of_event,1) from dual)
and -- finished his bundle then buy a new one
date_time_of_event < ( SELECT MIN(DATE_TIME_OF_EVENT)
                         FROM OLD_LTE_CDR
                         WHERE DATE_TIME_OF_EVENT > (select (first_bundle.date_time_of_event)+1/24 from dual)
                         AND IN_SERVICE_RESULT_INDICATOR=26);
select first_bundle.account_identifier ,first_bundle.top_up_profile_name
,FIRST_BUNDLE.date_time_of_event
INTO MDN,TOPUP,START_DATE
from dual;
insert into consumed1 VALUES(X,topup,MDN,START_DATE,Y);
end loop;
COMMIT;
end;

> where account_identifier=(select first_bundle.account_identifier from dual)
Why are you doing this? It's a completely unnecessary subquery.
Just do this:
where account_identifier = first_bundle.account_identifier
Same for all your other FROM DUAL subqueries. Get rid of them.
More importantly, don't use a cursor for loop. Just write one big INSERT statement that does what you want.

Sql Query takes too long to enter into the first line

Hi Friends,
I am using SQLServer 2008. I am running the query for fetching the data from database. when i am running first time after executed the "DBCC FREEPROCCACHE" query for clear cache memory, it takes too long (7 to 9 second) to enter into first
line of the stored procedure. After its enter into the first statement of the SP, its fetching the data within a second. I think there is no problem with Sqlquery. Kindly let me know if you know the reason behind this.
Sample Example:
Create Sp Sp_Name
as
Begin
print Getdate()
Sql statements for fetching datas
Print Getdate()
End
In the above example, there is no difference between first date and second date.
Please help me to trouble shooting this problem.
Thanks & Regards,
Rajkumar.R

i am running first time after executed the "DBCC FREEPROCCACHE" query for clear cache memory, it takes too long (7 to 9 second)
Additional to Manoj: A
DBCC FREEPROCCACHE clears the procedure cache, so all store procedure must be newly compilied on the first call.
Olaf Helper
[ Blog] [ Xing] [ MVP]

UCCX 7 applications take too long to be triggered

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for