Unity Connection Smart Host

We have two customers in the same building and they would like to share the same unity connection server. My question is can you have two smart host configured in unity connection to relay messages to two different exchange servers? In this case each customer having their own exchange server.

Off-topic question though but I've the info ready with me
Such integration procedures ( i.e. Cisco with 3rd Party ) are documented at Cisco Interoperability Portal . If you do not find your 3rd party PBX integration listed there, that means Cisco has not tested the integration yet. If it's business critical requirement for your org/customer, please reach out to Cisco CAM ( channel account management ) team locally in your country & they will cascade you with the Cisco Interop team ( responsible for such testing ) who will conduct the testing for you.
Good Luck !!
GP.
Pls rate helpful posts !!

Similar Messages

SW2 - Different certificates of Host App and Smart Connect. Host App cannot start.

I got my SmartWatch 2 today and installed Smart Connect and SmartWatch 2 app from google play, got the smartwatch to pairing with my phone manual bluetooth connect.
But in the notification bar i getting " Different certificates of Host App and Smart Connect. Host App cannot start." and i can not go in to settings on Smart Connect for the SW2.
Please help, right now i can not use the smartwatch becouse of no apps....
Solved!
Go to Solution.

That sounds strange. Have you installed both Smart Connect and SmartWatch 2 from Google Play or did you install them from another source? If installed from Google Play, uninstall (updates) SmartWatch 2 and Smart Connect and then install/update them again from Google Play.
- Official Sony Xperia Support Staff
If you're new to our forums make sure that you have read our Discussion guidelines.
If you want to get in touch with the local support team for your country please visit our contact page.

How to set-up voice mail to email on Unity Connection 8.6

Hi all,
I need to set-up voice mail to email notification on a Unity Connection 8.6 MCS78XX server. I've read several existing threads related to the subject, but have had somewhat of a difficult time finding a posting that provided a simplified approach with either or both of the options listed below. I'm hoping and asking to receive a response (or responses) that will break it down.
The intent is to either:
A) Have new voice mail messages sent to end-user's e-mail inboxes as .wav files.
B) Have notifications be e-mailed to end-user's inboxes whenever there is a new voice mail.
Cisco Unity Single Inbox is not the preferred method at this point.
I thank you all for your input and assistance!

Manish, if I may... I read the 2nd thread and it mentions the addition of the Exchange IP address under the smart host field... and it appears that the Exchange will also need the IP address of the Unity Connection server for relay...
question: under the Unity SMTP config options --> Server --> SMTP Domain --> can/should this be changed over to the Unity's IP address in an environment where the Unity Server's name is not resolvable? The Unity Server in this case is not configured with DNS... please advise
Thank you again!

Cisco Unity Connection not relaying voicemails outside the organization

Hi all, we are running Cisco Unity Connection version: 8.6.2ES25.21900-25. It has been set up to accept voicemails for Exchange 2010 users (in other words email messages with WAV attachments) and deliver these to their inboxes; this works with no problem.
I have two users who would like to receive these emails at their outside account, however the messages are never sent. I have tried the following:
Changed the users corporate email addresses from "[email protected]" to "[email protected]"
Unchecked the option to "Generate SMTP Proxy Address From Corporate Email Address."
On the "Message Actions" page for their account I have configured voicemail and email to "Relay the message" and entered their external SMTP addresses.
Confirmed the smart host setup is OK (points to our Exchange 2010 CAS which has firewall rules in place to permit it to send mail outside the organization.
Confirmed the Exchange 2010 CAS will accept SMTP messages from the subnet the Unity Connection server resides in.
If I switch the user SMTP settings BACK to their original internal SMTP addresses for my company the messages are then immediately delivered properly to these addresses. This signifies to me that Unity is periodically trying to send these items but they just aren't going out. No sign of the messages in any user report I ran in Unity nor message tracking in Exchange.
I also tried setting up an Outlook rule to forward these voicemail messages to the recipients external addresses but this did not work and after doing some research I see that the way in which Unity delivers the messages to these recipients internally (via EWS) is the reason why. I wonder if this is the same reason these are not going out to their external SMTP addresses.
Thanks for any assistance provided!

Look at the transfer options for that particular user and make sure it's set to ring the phone, that configuration is PER user.
HTH
java
if this helps, please rate
www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk

Cisco Unity Connection 8.6 Distribution list help.

We have a shared department line on several phones ( say 30 ) with VM and users were accessing the VM through the telephhone interface.
Recently we had a request from the leadership team ( say 5 ) , that they need unified messaging ( VM in their emails) for that department line.
How do i make it possible so that the leadership team has the unified messaging( VM in their emails ), while the other user still have access to the dept line VM through telephone interface.
If I create distribution list with the the leadership team as DL members and call handler for the dept line DN with message setting set to receipients as the distribution list , would that do it ? Will the other users still be able to access the VM through their phone. how do I make it possible .?

Indu,
I understand you requirement and I'll be upfront and say there are only so many options here as I see it and each has its own caveats/limitations. Here are a couple:
1. You will need an SMTP Smart Host configured for Unity Connection for this solution to work. The Smart Host is just an SMTP relay server and it needs to be configured to accept messages from and deliver messages to the SMTP domain of Unity Connection. That also means that you need to configure Unity Connection to allow inbound SMTP from this host (i.e., a trusted address configuration).
2. You will need an email distribution list or shared email address that you can forward a copy of voice messages for the mailbox to. That email distribution list needs to have your special users set as members.
3. Once the first 2 items are in place, go to the shared mailbox and set the Message Actions for Voicemail to "Accept and Relay" and then specify the relay address as the address for the distribution list you set up in item 2.
4. Leave the configuration for the shared mailbox the same except for the accept and relay configuration above. All users will continue to have the same phone-based functionality. The difference is that a COPY of every voicemail will be sent to the special users via the relay to distribution list. The caveat is that this is not Unified Messaging. It does get the voicemail into email but there is no synchronization of MWI and/or message status for users that rely on email client to check messages.
Another option would be an Integrated Messaging solution. This also is not Unified Messaging but does provide synchronziation between the shared line and email client; however, it requires that each of your special users set up an IMAP connection from their email client to the Unity Connection server. So, the messages will not be seen in their personal email inbox but rather in a separate IMAP folder in the email client.
Hailey
Please rate helpful posts!

Unity Connection 8.0 Intrasite-networking and SMTP Smarthost

Hi,
Two Unity Connection 8.0 clusters:
Cluster1: ServerA (Pub) and Server B (Sub);
Cluster2: ServerC(Pub) and Server D(Sub)
We want to setup intrasite networking between those two clusters. As listed in the networking guide of unity connection 8.x:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/8x/networking/guide/8xcucnet020.html
The followings are the requirement for SMTP or SMTP Smarthost.
(1) The servers that will be networked together are directly accessible through TCP/IP port 25 (SMTP), or SMTP messages are routable through an SMTP smart host.
(2) For Connection clusters, you must have a smart host available to resolve the SMTP domain of the cluster to both the publisher and subscriber servers in order for message traffic to reach
For the redundancy consideration, such as when one cluster's publisher is down, the subscriber can still send or receive message from another location, as per the documentation, a SMTP smarthost is required.
I am questioning if this external SMTP smarthost is really required, since in case the customer could not provide us the Smarthost to relay the message, how should we do?
If we configure SMTP Access for Cluster Subscriber Servers as listed in http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/8x/networking/guide/8xcucnet020.html#wp1053483
will this exclude the requirement of smarthost when one publisher server is down?
Thanks,
JJ

Editing prompts such as it is will probably never be supported by Unity or Connection - for a request like this it would have to be provided in the conversation (phrase logic) as an option to use one term or the other.
I know it seems like just hacking and slashing the prompt files should be a no brainer and we're just being obstinate by not allowing it but that's not the case.
Many of the prompts used to construct the language specific phrase files are used in more than one place (i.e. each phrase does not have duplicate WAV files for each "token" used to make up the complete phrase - they get shared) - so it's a dangerous thing to go in and start replacing prompts here and there since it many times has unintended consequences. Supporting folks going in and making such changes and then calling TAC because something "sounds funny" is a daunting task as you can imagine.
once you open that up to other languages it gets gnarly in a hurry. The last voice mail system I dealt with that actually allowed for this type of thing was Repartee (DOS based system back in the 90s) - and when it got ported to OS/2 and then Windows support for direct prompt edits was yanked for the same reasons.
so long way of saying direct prompt edits are not in our future I don't think. I can pass on your concerns with "ID" vs. "Extension" anyway...

Delete email will delete VM (VoiceMail) on Cisco Unity Connection 8.0

Dear Netpro Gurus,
One of my customers have recently bought a new Cisco Unity Connection 8.0. They are currently using Microsoft Outlook (with Microsoft Exchange) and they are currently setup with SMTP Smart Host so whenever they got a new Voicemail on their Cisco IP phone, they will automatically receive a new email with WAV attachment on their Microsoft Outlook.
However, what they found is say when they have 20 x new Voicemail messages, they will have 20 x emails with WAV attachments which is normal. But when they listen and delete all their email attachments, they still have to go to their Voicemail inbox on their IP Phones by pressing the 'Envelope' button and delete the SAME 20 x Voicemail messages before their MWI will go off.
What my customer wants is there any method when my customer delete all their emails on Outlook, the voicemail on Unity Connection will too be deleted at the SAME TIME, and also the MWI will turn off the SAME TIME??
Cheers,
Hunt

Since you're with IBM you should be able to open a case with us (PDI) and we can give you further details about what you're looking for.
HTH
java
If this helps, please rate
www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk

Unity Connection - sending email to more than one recipient

Hello.
I would like to know how can I send voicemail message via email to more than one recipient.
It works for me with one recipient (Smart Host + Accept and Relay Message in User Message Actions, but in relay address I can only use one email address).
Thanks in advance

A mailbox in Unity Connection is intended - and licensed - for a single user. It was not intended to allow for multiple receiptient distribution. If you want that functionality you could create each user a mailbox, add a distribution list with the mailboxes as members, and a call handler to address message to the DL instead of an individual mailbox the messages out.
Short of that you would need to have the SMTP smart host forward the message to multiple people (i.e. an email distribution list)
Please remember to rate helpful responses and identify helpful or correct answers.

Exchange 2007 and 2010 with Unity Connection 8.6

Hi all,
We have unity connection 8.6 and exchange 2007 currently in place and runnign fine. I am ready to start migrating mailboxes over to our new exchange 2010 farm and as such we will be in co-exsistance with exchange 2007 and 2010 for awhile. What are the steps or procdures to also include exchange 2010 with the 2007 in unity connections? Currently under Smart Host is the IP address of our exchange 2007 server.
Thank you.

Hi,
This depends on how you plan on performing the migration. I would suggest the following:
-Creating a new unified messaging service for Exch 2010. You can re-use the same service account name as long as you completed the configuration steps for that integration.
-As you move over user's mailboxes from 2007 to 2010, you can delete the 2007 UM service and add the new 2010 UM service. If you want to change many users at a time you'll need to use bulk administration to change them. If you use BAT to change accounts, see the link below where I have listed them out for another CSC user.
-You can change the Smart Host setting once you have configured the Exch 2010 enviornment to handle your main corporate mail (changing the MX records to point to a 2010 Edge Transport).
Changing the UM service with BAT:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3572200#3572200
Good luck.

Unity Connections and SMTP

Currently I have Unity 8.6. I have a remote office that will not be on our domain or Exchange server (they are going to Microsoft 365). Is there a way to send via SMTP their voicemails over to them with the acknowledgement that features will not all be there like Unified Messaging?
Thanks!

Hello David,
I would also need clarification on what stands for remote office, is it a CUC, Exchange server or something else?
Assuming that what you are trying to deploy is relaying messages to users outside from your CUC server without using Unified Messaging then you would just simply configure:
1. Smart Host: This will be the relay point that handles where on messages go. Most likely it will be an Exchange server.
2.Under User>Edit>Message Actions> Select for Voicemails or all the applicable options you wish to relay> Accept and relay. Then at the bottom put the email address where you want it to be send.
Basically CUC will notice that the address is an external domain, it will look for the Smart Host configured and send the message, afterwards Connection is out of the scope and it's up for Exchange or whatever other server you have configured to manage the messages to reach it's intended destination.
-David

Unity Connection Integration with CS 1000 and Meridian 81 - PIMG

I have a customer who have (2) Nortel Meridian 81 and (1) CS1000 for their 3 locations along with Octal 350 servicing 2500 voicemail users today. Customer also has a Cisco UCM in their network today which is servicing their wireless phone users.
UCM and CS1000 are networked together using Q.Sig trunks today. Customer is looking at replacing their Octal solution with a new Voice mail solution.
I was looking at integration documents for Unity Connection using PIMG.
In this scenario, would I need 3 separate PIMG 's at the three remote sites and integrate it with Unity connection or Can I achieve this using just one PIMG at one of the sites, considering the three sites are trunked together using tie-trunks.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/7x/integration/pimg/guide/cucintpimg090.html#wp1051831
Appreciate any pointers/ help.

Hi there,
Just to add a note to the great tips from Hailey (+5 Hailey!)
We are in the final stages of replacing our "old" Octel with Unity Connection, part of
which is integrated to our CS1000 and CUCM in a "Hybrid" deployment like yours
Centralized Voice Messaging
Cisco Unity Connection supports centralized voice messaging through the phone system, which supports
various inter-phone system networking protocols including proprietary protocols such as Avaya DCS,
Nortel MCDN, or Siemens CorNet, and standards-based protocols such as QSIG or DPNSS. Note that
centralized voice messaging is a function of the phone system and its inter-phone system networking,
not voice mail. Connection will support centralized voice messaging as long as the phone system and its
inter-phone system networking are properly configured.
Setting Up a Nortel Meridian 1 Digital PIMG
Integration with Cisco Unity Connection
Attachments:
cucwithnortel.pdf (308.1 K)
Centralized voice messaging provides voice messaging services to all users in a networked phone system environment. Connection can be hosted on a message center PINX and provide voice messaging services to all users in an enterprise assuming the message center PINX and all user PINX phone systems are properly networked.For a centralized voice messaging configuration to exist, a suitable inter-phone system networking protocol must exist to deliver a minimum level of feature support, such as:•Message waiting indication (MWI).•Transfer, which ensures that the correct calling/called party ID is delivered to the voice messaging system.•Divert, which ensures that the correct calling/called party ID is delivered to the voice messaging system.Other features may be required depending on how the voice messaging system is to be used. For example, if it is also serving as an automated attendant, path-replacement is needed as this feature prevents calls from hair-pinning.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/7x/design/guide/7xcucdg050.html#wp1053538
Cheers!
Rob

Voice Mail Ports Rejected in CUCM - Unity Connection

Hi to all,
I have a CUCM v9.1 cluster (1 Pub and 2 Subs) with two device pools (DP_Site_A and DP_Site_B), each DP has a call manager group that has the Subscriber for each site as the Primary CUCM Server in order of registration: DP_Site_A -> CMGroup_A ( 1° Sub_A and 2° Sub_B) ,
DP_Site_B -> CMGroup_B ( 1° Sub_B and 2° Sub_A).
The issue that I have is that when I configure the voice ports in the CUCM with either DP_Site_A or DP_Site_B I always get those ports as "Rejected" in the registration status BUT if i leave the DP for the voice ports as default they get registered and actually work fine with voice mails.
My Unity Connection is v9.1 too.
Any ideas about what can be causing this behavior??
Thanks in advance for your help.

Hi Alfonso,
Can you check these settings in CUC for the "Secondary" CUCM (Sub) server config
to make sure the Subs are listed as part of the SCCP registration;
Step 32 On the Edit Servers page, do the following substeps if the Cisco Unified CM cluster has secondary servers. Otherwise, skip to Step 33.
a. Under Cisco Unified Communications Manager Servers, click Add.
b. Enter the following settings for the secondary Cisco Unified CM server and click Save.
# Table 6-16     Settings for the Cisco Unified Communications Manager Servers
# Field
# Setting
# Order
# Enter the order of priority for the Cisco Unified CM server. The lowest number is the primary Cisco Unified CM server, the higher numbers are the secondary servers.
# IP Address or Host Name
# Enter the IP address (or host name) of the secondary Cisco Unified CM server.
# Port
# Enter the TCP port of the Cisco Unified CM server that you are   integrating with Cisco Unity Connection. We recommend that you use the   default setting.
# TLS Port
# Enter the TLS port of the Cisco Unified CM server that you are   integrating with Cisco Unity Connection. We recommend that you use the   default setting.
# Server Type
# Click Cisco Unified Communications Manager.
http://www1.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/7x/integration/cucm_sccp/guide/cucintcucmskinny050.html
Cheers!
Rob
"Talk about a dream
Try to make it real"
- Springsteen

Unity Connection Voice Mail Only- NO MWI template

I am deploying a site with 8,000 mailboxes. 4,000 of those users are voice mail only without a telephone and will NOT require MWI.
I can manually remove the MWI setting from each mailbox, but I am looking at either a BATCH CSV setting or a TEMPLATE that I can turn OFF mwi when creating the users.
Any ideas?
TIA

Hi there,
This setting change is available via Bulk Edit
Bulk Edit> Messages> Disable MWI functionality for this user
Bulk Edit changed in 8.x from where it was accessed in 7.x.
Here's a clip that speaks to how this is run now. You first search and select all
the users you want to change and then choose Bulk Edit;
To Edit User Account Information in Bulk Edit Mode (some editing from original > this example
is for Caller Input settings but you'll see the point)
Step 1 In Cisco Unity Connection Administration, on the Search Users page, check the applicable user check boxes, and select Bulk Edit.
If the user accounts that you want to edit in bulk do not all appear on one Search page, check all applicable check boxes on the first page, then go to the next page and check all applicable check boxes, and so on, until you have selected all applicable users. Then select Bulk Edit.
Step 2 On the Edit Caller Input page, change settings as applicable.
Note The Status message at the top of the Edit Caller Input page tells you how many user accounts are being edited. Also note that the page is populated only with the fields that you are allowed to edit in bulk mode, and that the fields available for edit also depend on whether all of the user accounts reside on the local server.
Step 3 If applicable, set the Bulk Edit Task Scheduling Fields to schedule the Bulk Edit operation for a later date and/or time.
Step 4 Select Submit.
Step 5 If applicable, continue to change settings for these user accounts on the related pages available from the Edit menu. As you make changes on each page, select Submit before going on to the next page to make additional changes.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/8x/user_mac/guide/8xcucmac090.html#wp1049545
Try a couple of test users first to come up with the exact plan.
If you prefer you can also use Bulk Edit via .csv
As a test here I tried the Bulk Edit and chose;
User with Voicemail > Users referenced in this CSV file > Next
This then allowed me to browse to an existing "basic" .csv that I had
used to create a test user recently when playing with BAT. In this .csv
I had one user named Bob Uncle with DN/ext 5126. So when I used this method
the Bulk Edit tool (smart puppy ) selected only Bob Uncle for my edit choices
and I was able to change the Disable MWI functionality for this user
Again, please try manipulating some test users to perfect
your methodology.
I have attached the test .csv I used
Cheers!
Rob
Attachments: buncletest Mailboxes.csv.zip (255 bytes)
"Show a little faith, there's magic in the night" - Springsteen

Exchange 2013 will not send out email using MX records, but will via smart host.

When I use a smart host my email goes out fine, but when I use MX look-up it does not.
Inbound mail works when I use Telnet to test it.
Could this be because I'm testing the server from our office that the FQDN on the Exchange Server will not resolve back to the IP address I'm testing from?

Yes almost certainly.
If when the server does the MX lookup for the destination address it resolves to your external IP address then it's quite likely that it won't be able to send. A lot of firewalls can't handle having a connection made from the internal network for an external
IP address that it controls, and won't simply pass the connection back to the internal network. When using the smart host though, the destination is external so the message can reach it and then when the smart host tries to deliver the message to your external
IP it's coming from an external source so it works.
Tricky one to explain but I hope that makes sense.

Upgrading Unity Connection from 7.1.5 to 8.5.1 - not working

I am attempting to upgrade our unity connection boxes from 7.1.5 to 8.5.1.
I have legacy MCS 7845H2 - It has 4 disks - 2 mirrors of 72gb disks. 4mb of RAM and 2 X 2.3ghz processors
I have UCS C210 VMWare Hosts.
I have attempted 2 migration methods.
The first method involves - upgrading the existing system and restoring a backup of this to a VM
This fails with a hardware compatablity check.
The second method involves - backup existing systen - build VM at same level (using recommending OVA) - restore data onto VM - upgrade VM
This fails with a restore problem - I have used 'TITAN' ftp, but please note the backup is < 900mb.
The error is
Physical restore failed - could not fork server connection, SQLCODE -25596
Program over.
Restore failed during Unity Connection DB ontape restore operation.
----> BEGIN Standard Error
/opt/cisco/connection/lib/disaster-recovery/database_do_restore.real.py:32: RuntimeWarning: Python C API version mismatch for module iproduct: This Python has API version 1013, module iproduct has version 1012.
import iproduct
gunzip: stdout: Broken pipe
----> END Standard Error
Has anyone out there attempted to upgrade to 8.5.1 - please let me know how you got on.
Any help or ideas appreciated.

Here is the end of the restore log ...
CCM DB is in On-Line status after 6 second.
Restoring the Unity Connection database from ontape archive...
Archive Tape Information
Tape type: Archive Backup Tape
Online version: IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 10.00.UC9XF
Archive date: Mon Sep 26 19:45:06 2011
User id: root
Terminal id: ?
Archive level: 0
Tape device: STDIO
Tape blocksize (in k): 32
Tape size (in k): 0
Tape number in series: 1
Spaces to restore:1 [rootdbs ]
2 [cuc_er_dbspace ]
3 [dir16 ]
4 [rpt ]
5 [mbx16 ]
6 [dyn ]
7 [mbx ]
8 [dir ]
9 [log ]
10 [cuc_er_sbspace ]
11 [ciscounity_sbspace ]
12 [ciscounity_sbspacetemp ]
Archive Information
IBM Informix Dynamic Server Copyright IBM Corporation 1986, 2008
Initialization Time 06/01/2011 15:51:53
System Page Size 2048
Version 14
Archive CheckPoint Time 09/26/2011 19:45:07
Dbspaces
number flags fchunk nchunks flags owner name
1 40001 1 1 N B informix rootdbs
2 48001 2 1 N SB informix cuc_er_sbspace
3 40001 3 1 N B informix cuc_er_dbspace
4 40001 4 1 N B informix dir16
5 40001 5 1 N B informix rpt
6 42001 6 1 N TB informix temp
7 40001 7 1 N B informix mbx16
8 42001 8 1 N TB informix temp2
9 40001 9 1 N B informix dyn
10 40001 10 1 N B informix mbx
11 40001 11 1 N B informix dir
12 40001 12 1 N B informix log
13 48001 13 1 N SB informix ciscounity_sbspace
14 48001 14 1 N SB informix ciscounity_sbspacetemp
Chunks
chk/dbs offset size free bpages flags pathname
1 1 0 250000 183419 PO-B /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/root_dbspace
2 2 0 915000 176607 POSB /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/cuc_er_sbspace
3 3 0 85000 83217 PO-B /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/cuc_er_dbspace
4 4 0 128000 13824 PO-B /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/dir16_dbs
5 5 0 1024000 744409 PO-B /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/rpt_dbs
6 6 0 512000 511922 PO-B /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/temp_dbs
7 7 0 512000 495816 PO-B /usr/local/cm/db/informix/data/mbx16_dbs
8 8 0 512000 511897 PO-B /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/temp2_dbs
9 9 0 128000 110000 PO-B /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/dyn_dbs
10 10 0 128000 119774 PO-B /usr/local/cm/db/informix/data/mbx_dbs
11 11 0 1024000 362797 PO-B /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/dir_dbs
12 12 0 150000 24947 PO-B /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/log_dbs
13 13 0 10000 518 POSB /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/ciscounity_sbspace
14 14 0 450000 22554 POSB /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/ciscounity_sbspacetemp
Physical restore failed - could not fork server connection, SQLCODE -25596
Program over.
Restore failed during Unity Connection DB ontape restore operation.
----> BEGIN Standard Output
----> END Standard Output
----> BEGIN Standard Error
/opt/cisco/connection/lib/disaster-recovery/database_do_restore.real.py:32: RuntimeWarning: Python C API version mismatch for module iproduct: This Python has API version 1013, module iproduct has version 1012.
import iproduct
gunzip: stdout: Broken pipe
----> END Standard Error

Unity Connection Smart Host

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for