Unlimited MIRO invoice allowed for GR based IV item

Hi,
I have a problem where the user keeps posting invoices against incorrect Service ENtry Sheets(SES). The user wants to know if there is a message which can be given at this point.
PO item is a service
The flag for GR based IV is set.
The following processing has been done.
PO qty: 45600
1) SES1 - Amount 11400
2) GR1 against SES1
Dr      expense            11,400
Cr      GR/IR Clearing     -11,400
3) IR1 - Amount 4,998.15 against SES1
Cr      Vendor          -4,998.15
Dr     GR/IR Clearing     11,400
Cr     Expense          -6,401.85
At this point, the GR/IR clearing account has been cleared and the expense account entries have also been nullified.
So the effective posting in FI will be as follows:
Cr      Vendor          -4,998.15
Dr      expense            (11,400-6401.85) = 4998.15
At this point, if I try to create an invoice using MIRO wrt the same PO item, it still allows me to post an invoice of 6401.85 as the difference between the GR amount and the IR amount still exists.
The invoice is not even set for blocking.
However, FI wise, there is no pending invoice for this item.
The users do not want this scenario to be allowed. Can anyone suggest how this can be prevented.
If I do post this invoice at this stage, it creates the following FI entries.
Cr     Vendor          - 6401.85
Dr     Expense            6401.85
After this, any further invoices on this PO item are blocked for payment.
Please help as this scenario keeps on occuring for service items and becomes a mess for items having multiple SES.
Let me know if further inputs are required.
Thanks!
PM

Hello Sudhir,
Thanks for your response. However, in this case, the quantity has not been exceeded.
If you notice, the IRd amount(4998.15) is still less than the GRd amount(11400) in the PO history.
However, the postings have been cleraed at the FI document level.
The checks that you have mentioned get hit only after the IR amount crosses the GR amount of 11400 and then th einvoice goes into payment block. Which is correct.
Please let me know if you have further suggestions or if I have understood your response incorrectly.
Thanks!
PM

Similar Messages

  • Allow for more than ONE item in a single row?

    Allow for more than ONE item in a single row? I can't use this wonderful program unless I can get more than one field on a row (i.e. 1st name, mi, last name etc)

    Thanks for your feedback. This is something we definetely want to provide next year (can't say when yet).
    If others are interested in this feature please vote on it within the idea tab: http://forums.adobe.com/ideas/1046
    That helps us prioritize our work based on customer demand.
    Randy

  • MIRO invoice verification for Service entry sheet

    When trying to do invoice verification for Service entry sheet i am getting this below error pls guide me
    Delivery note/service entry sheet 5000000150  does not exist
    Message no. M8183

    Hi,
    You may be saves SES number and now SES is not released!
    1st Just cross check PO history TAB of service PO(ME23N), did you have only service entry sheet number or you have service entry sheet number and material document( will be created after releasing SES) with 101 movement type.
    You have created service entry sheet (SES) in ML81N and got SES number, so as to recognize the vendor performed service. Next step, you need to accept service by releasing SES( in ML81N by clicking green flag or if release strategy there for SES, you need to release SES in ML85) so that  FI document will be created.
    Once SES released, then you can do MIRO w.r.t SES only.
    Check doc:
    http://help.sap.com/bp_bl604/BBLibrary/Documentation/209_BPP_EN_FI.doc
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Final invoice indicator for Service based IV

    Hello,
    For invoice verification based on Service entry, the system proposes the final invoice indicator checked.  I'm trying to uncheck this indicator as in our case, vendors usually sends partial invoices.
    We have FM implemented and applied Link: [note 583400 MIRO: EREKZ always proposed with services|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lcyZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=583400] and it solved part of our issue, as leaving the commitment in the PO, but we need to find a way to unmark the indicator on MIRO so the GR - IV account is not cleared after a partial invoice.
    I would appreciate if someone can tell me how to approach this scenario.
    Thanks in advance,

    Hello Bharat,
    The indicator of the PO is set after this indicator on the invoice. It is actually a result of the IV unless you apply the note 583400.
    What I need is that this indicator to be unchecked for Service items with service entry.
    Regards,

  • MIRO Invoice - Testing for INVOIC02 in EDI scenario

    Dear Experts,
    I am doing a scenario for testing the inbound process for Invoice ( MM ).
    ( Sending system is LS of XI and receiving system is LS of R/3)
    If any body has done this test idoc prcoessing for the scenario, i need your valuable help in how to go about this.
    In simple, how to do the WE19 for MM invoice verification.
    When I am doing the test scenario, I am getting an error.
    LS   'Vendor No'  company code not maintained.
    But if I go to OBCA there no LS for Vendor.
    So, can anyone guide me what should be the value for the below segment E1EDKA1   ( PARVW and PARTN) .
    Also the value for the segment  E1EDK14  .
    If any one provide me moredetails about this , i would be grateful to you.
    Regards
    RAj

    Self Resolved. Config missing in OBCA

  • SRM PO failed: Indicator for GR-based invoice verification used not allowed

    Hi Friends,
        I have an issue with a specific PO failed to transfer from SRM to ECC. We are in ECS scenario, SRM 5.0 Service level 7.0. We are in process of SP upgrade but this issue occured in Production system which is still in old SP level(SP 7.0).
    when I check the App Monitor, I am see the following errors:  but the status shows Auto_Completed
    1. PO: Indicator for GR-based invoice verification used not allowed
    2. PO: Instance XXXXXXXXXX of object type PurchaseOrder could not be changed
    3.  PurchOrder XXXXXXXXXX: Purchase order still contains faulty items
    4.  PO XXXXXXXX: Indicator for GR-based invoice verification used not allowed
    I can see the PO copied over to ECC. but status in SRM PO shows 'Error in Process'.
      BBP_PD for object PO shows:  Created, complete, ordered, In Transfer to Execute, Change was Transmitted  as Inactive status.    Transfer Failed shows Active, Document completed, created.
    I checked BP Maintain  for the vendor and PO and its no different than other POs and Vendors except Vendor had 'Goods Receipt based Invoice Verification' indicator checked in SRM.
    I tried to simulate the same Material, Vendor with GR-IV indicator both on and off, it works fine. Ofcourse this is in Quality box with SP 15 level.
    So, I am not sure if SP level upgrade might help it or not? If there are any other means to test, please advise.
    thanks
    Rao

    I was wondering how I could liquidate the PO by either creating a new PO or ??.
    What you could do to revive the PO in question is that after the upgrade, and after a round of background jobs run for CLEAN_REQREQ_UP and BBP_GET_STATUS_2, ask the buyer to make a dummy change to the PO (for example, change the description of the PO) and order again. This would trigger the transfer to the backend again. And hopefully this time, no error would occur.

  • PO 6500002415: Indicator for GR-based invoice verification used n ot allowe

    A SRM PO item was delivered, but later we reverse the goods receipt.
    Then I mark deletion for this item, the SRM status shows "Transfer Failed (E.Sys.) "
    In the applicaiton monitor it shows
    PO 6500002415: Purchase order still contains faulty items    
    PO 6500002415: Indicator for GR-based invoice verification used n ot allowed    
    PO 6500002415: Instance 6500002415 of object type PurchaseOrder c ould not be changed

    Hello,
    Pls review the following thread:
    SRM PO failed: Indicator for GR-based invoice verification used not allowed
    Regards,
    Nagarajan

  • Regarding Tolerance Keys for Invoice Block For Payment in MIRO

    Hi all,
    In customizing, I have defined Tolerance Keys for Invoice Block for Payment. I have defined all tolerance keys for my company code ...... with Absolute as well as Percentage Limits. But whenever I am doing MIRO & testing for my Block Codes effectiveness, i am finding that everytime my Invoice gets Blocked by Tolerance Key PP(Price Variance) or by date......but not by any other like BD, BW, KW etc. Can anyone help me as how I should check for this. I even tried to study the documentation part available in customizing, but was unable to understand the term like Order Price Quantity units.......Can anyone help me in understanding this thing ........
    Regards.....

    Hi Ganesh,
    below is the user exit where you can check the tolarance and put the Block according to the your requirment.
    User Exit name - MM08R002 -User exit for tolerance checks
    in the above user exit you have to use  the below Function exit.
    1) EXIT_SAPLMRMC_001
    2) EXIT_SAPLMRMP_001
    we implemented the above user exit to put the payment block based on the checks.
    You can find the documentation of the above exit in the system.
    Thanks
    Naresh

  • Trigger workflow for MIRO invoice creation

    Hello,
    In standard functionning it is not possible to trigger the workflow for documents coming from MM.
    When using transaction MIRO and selecting invoice creation the created document has following value :
    BKPF-AWTYP = 'RMRP'. whereas creating it from FB60 results to BKPF-AWTYP = 'BKPF'.
    The problem is standard code checks AWTYP is not equal to 'RMRP' before creating event to start the standard workflow for invoice validation.
    Question : why sap doesn't allow workflow creation for invoices from MIRO?
    Thanks for your answers.
    Best regards,
    Laurent.

    Hi,
    here they are...
    WS20000397 MMIVBlockedP Treatment of inv. blkd for price, Log.IV
    WS20001004 MMIVToRel Release the Completed Log. IV Document
    WS00400026 MMIVquantity Treatment inv.blocked f.quantity reasons
    WS20001003 MMIVToCompl Complete the Parked Log. IV Document
    WS00400027 MMIVprice Treatment invoic.blocked f.price reasons
    All of these workflows are a one-step / one-level of approval and needs some workflow configuration at least for the agent assignments. For a full-blown workflow you should take these workflows as an example, how you could work with it.
    The last two workflows work with preliminary posting on the miro (transaction MIR7).
    Best regards,
    Florin

  • MIRO Invoice Receipting Workflow Solution for unreceipted Goods / Services

    Hi
    We wish to improve the flow of Invoice Receipting (MIRO).
    Problem:
    Invoices are receipted centrally at head office
    Goods/Service Receipts are performed on location at site
    Some Invoices are received from the Vendor before site has goods/service receipted the item.
    Current configuration prevents invoice being entered when no goods receipt.
    Ideally, the sites would receipt on time, but as a solution we are considering two options. I would appreciate any thoughts on whether is possible as well as guidance on implementing a solution.
    OPTION A. - With Parking
    1. When Head Office cannot post invoice (due to unreceipted goods/service), user parks the invoice.
    2. This sends a workflow email to the site that invoice has been parked.
    3. Head Office attaches a scanned image of the invoice to the parked document, so the site can review.
    4. Site enters Goods/Service Receipt.
    5. Work flow is triggered back to head office that a goods receipt was performed against a PO that has a parked invoice
    6. Head Office posted parked invoice.
    OPTION B - Without Parking
    1. Configuration is changed so that Invoice Receipt can be performed when no goods/service receipt.
    2. Invoice is posted and blocked for payment.
    3. This sends a workflow email to the site that invoice has been blocked for payment.
    4. Head Office attaches a scanned image of the invoice to the parked document, so the site can review.
    5. Site enters Goods/Service Receipt.
    6. Work flow is triggered back to head office that a goods receipt was performed against a PO that has a blocked invoice.
    7. Head Office unblocks invoice.
    Many thanks
    Adrian

    Hi Adrian,
    Option B is very much feasible by developing the workflow for users.
    OPTION B - Without Parking
    1. Configuration is changed so that Invoice Receipt can be performed when no goods/service receipt.
    2. Invoice is posted and blocked for payment.
    3. This sends a workflow email to the site that invoice has been blocked for payment.
    4. Head Office attaches a scanned image of the invoice to the parked document, so the site can review.
    5. Site enters Goods/Service Receipt.
    6. Work flow is triggered back to head office that a goods receipt was performed against a PO that has a blocked invoice.
    7. Head Office unblocks invoice.
    IF GR based IV is removed, Invoice can be done before GR. Having a GR based IV tick in PO (Mandatory) would ensure IV is raised only after the quantity is delivered.
    I doubt if Scanning of invoice copy is possible in the MM system, but it would be feasible via Document Management in SAP.
    Alternatively, you can have Idoc based creation for Invoice based on GR quantity.

  • Invoice is not allowed for order 00065

    Hi experts,
    This error is relating to the Accounts payables(SAP). The error occurred and the invoice has fallen out from ERP (SAP) while posting the invoice.  The error is "no invoice is allowed for order 00065". 
    some Inputs: if you go to ME23N screen line item details invoice tab you can find the check boxes like Incoming Invoice, cost centre and Order. Usually for a particular PO incoming invoice and cost centre check boxes will be checked but in this case Order check box is checked and the invoice has fallen out from ERP.
    Could any body please let me know how to resolve this issue in SAP. I'm not FI/CO consultant but SAP BW if I know i can guide team.
    Thanks in advance,
    amarnath

    Dear,
    What is message number? Did you assign the usersttus in BS02?
    For allocation activity costs, we need to define activity type in KL01 by specifying the unit of measurement of the particular activity type (like  machine - Hours etc.). While creating activity type, we will assign a secondary cost element (with category 43) in the activity type through which the activity cost will flow.
    After that we will plan for cost center in KP06 (cost elementwise). Then we will plan machine hours in KP26 where we will link the activity type to a particular cost center.
    When we do price calculation in KSPI, system checks the planned costs for cost center (in KP06) and also checks the machine hours planned (in KP26) and gives the cost for the particular activity type.
    Please check the above in the system
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Excise Invoice for Order Based Billing Scenerion

    Dear Friends,
    We have a scenarion, wherein we are working with Sales Order Based Billing.
    We are in the process of Implementing CIN with TAXINN.
    Is it possible to create excise invoice for the scenarion of Sales Order based billing, instead of delivery based billing.
    If yes, what are the steps we need to follow to configure the same.
    Regards,
    Harsh

    hi
    If u want the create  Excise Invoice for Order Based Billing Scenerion, u must be set in billing document in General control in fields is.
    <b> SD document categ.   M      Invoice                                            
    Transaction group    7      Billing documents                                  
    Billing category                                                               
    Document type                                                                  
    Negative posting            No negative posting                                
    Branch/Head office          Customer=Payer/Branch=sold-to party                
                                 No                                                 
    Invoice list type    LR     Invoice List                                                                               
    Rebate settlement                                                              
    Standard text     </b>     
    Best copy of F2 Invice. and this billing type in outgoing invoices in Tax on goods movement in Logistics general.
    Rewards point it helps

  • Error in MIRO -  " No taxes on sales/purch.are allowed for account 174600

    Hi freinds,
    a have created new condition type for PO maintained the same Pricing procedure also .now my problem is while doing miro it is showing an error that " No taxes on sales/purch.are allowed for account 174600 1000, V0 is no is not allowed "
    pls help me out .
    regards,
    Rashmi

    Hi
    Fo to FS00 enter your GL and company code go to change made and then go to contoal data tab and then in Tax category
    select * or as per your requirment.
    regards

  • Payment Method not in F110 for MIRO invoices

    Good day all
    One of our company codes are experiencing the following problem.
    1. The payment method is maintained in the vendor master.
    2. When doing a FB60 (sundry invoice) and the F110 (automatic payment) the payment program picks up the invoice for payment and all 100%.
    3. When doing a MIRO (LIV invoice) and then F110, the payment program issues error that no valid payment method is found for the MIRO invoice.
    4. This is happening on the same vendor account.
    What can the reason be that the payment program picks up the payment method for the sundry invoice but not for the MIRO invoice?
    Any advice or ideas?
    Thank you all.
    Lu.

    Hi Reema,
    I also faced similar problem earlier. Following could be the reasons:(These worked for me)
    1. The vendor is already picked up in an earlier run and that run is not fully processed.
    2. The amount is not yet due
    3. Sometimes, if the address in the vendor master is not fully updated, it fails to pick it up. This usually happens if you have enabled jurisdiction codes etc
    Hope this helps
    Regards,

  • TDS adjustment  for MIRO Invoice MM Period Closed.

    Hi Experts,
    We Have got issue wrt TDS entry in the system.
    Our client plant has entered downpayments for a vendor and deducted TDS on the same for the Period from Sep 11 to Dec 11
    The HO has already remitted the TDS Payments to the Government. (Outside the system)
    Meanwhile the MM Period is closed for the Period from Sep 11 to Dec 11 ( the Current Period Open are Jan 12 and Feb 12)
    Now they want to post MIRO Invoices in the system, but as the MM Period is closed they can enter invoices only for the current period.
    How can they adjust the TDS amount posted against downpayment and MIRO Invoice ?
    also should they not deduct any TDS on MIRO Invoice or Deduct TDS and Adjust the invoice using F-54 ?
    Also should we make remittance challan in the system for Sep 11 ?
    Awaiting your reply.
    Regards
    Gautam.

    Hi,
    You will Go to  SE16  give  table name  MARV  enter,  select your company code XXXX, Execute  & select your client XXX and F2 and go to command box enter  /h  press enter twice and go to menu path select debugger and select  switch to classic debugger Double click on  "if code", you will be provide with "if code and show, remove show and give EDIT and press F8 (execute), you will be displayed with delete entry button, and click on delete entry button and save
    and go to OMSY And chose your company code select your required period , year and save
    Thanks,
    Raviteja

Maybe you are looking for