Update condition table A846 belonging to the MWST access sequence

Hi.
I´m working with CRM 3.0, and we had a TAX change in R/3, now when we try to update de table A846 (R/3 table) in crm, with Tx r3as the table clears all records and don´t write the new records! this table concerns to a access sequence for condition MWST.
I think the problem could be in the zdnl_cond_a846 filters, but I don´t know wich were the original filters.
Thanks

Hi,
Did you downloaded DNL_CUST_CND, DNL_CUST_FGD, DNL_CUST_PRC?
After downloading DNL_CUST_TAX verify your tax load in CRM using report CRM_TAX_CUST_VALIDATE.
If you have any issues in Tax Settings in CRM, tax related data will not be loaded into CRM.
Regards,
Bhanu

Similar Messages

Error in updating condition table 372

Hello,
While saving Excise Invoice I am facing error 'Error in updating condition table 372'.Could you please solve this probelm?
Thanks in Advance

Dear All,
I done this--by doing some configuration changes.
Normally while doing Exports we are tempted to use the same sales area and accordingly we may give the combination of excise grp+series grp+export type in IMG>>>Logistics General>>>India>>>Business transactions>>>Outgoing excise invoices>>>Maintain default excise groups and series groups.
Once after removing the export type to your sales area combination--system will show this error--and we cannot even post the Excise invoices.(J1IIN)
I tried in my IDES--that with export type(Ex.Export under Bond)--with this assignment--i am able to post my excise invoices.
Once after removing this assignment of export type--again i am getting this error.
Actually i am not even aware why it is happening--almost after two months of struggle--i find this.
(i feel it is in the same way that we cannot even open/See a sales order by deleting sales group which was created&used previously)
i am sharing this because somebody may get a little help with my thread.
Mark this if helpful--there by others can easily find this thread.
Phanikumar

T-Code to update condition table for delivery & transport scheduling to SCM

Hello,
Could you tell the T-code to update condition table for delivery & transport scheduling to SCM system
These are the some SAP fileds
/SAPCN1/KOTABNR (Condition Table)
/SAPCND/KAPPL(Application)
/SAPCND/KSCHL(Condition type)
/SAPCND/KOLNR(Access sequence)
Thanks in Advance
RK
Edited by: RK on Jun 9, 2009 5:58 PM

HI
The TCODE for this is /SAPAPO/ATP_GCM.
Regards
Anurag.

How to list all tables that belongs to the current user?

hi all
"select tblowner,tblname from tables where tblowner in (select user from dual);"
I want a list of all tables that belongs to the current user. I use the SQL above, but given "no rows selectd",but if
I replace the subquery with literal,like
"select tblowner,tblname from tables where tblowner = 'JFMDB');".
I got the list. why?
Thnk u very much！

This looks like a bug that was fixed in 7.0.5.13 and onwards. I can reproduce what you are seeing in 7.0.5.10.0 (Linux x86-64 / Access control enabled instance from root install) but not 7.0.5.13.0 (Linux x86-64 / Access control enabled instance from root install).
Unfortunately I don't have a bug number to pass on. I can't see anything relevant listed in the Release Notes and I haven't found a likely candidate in our internal listings. This may well have been one that was fixed "in passing" when RnD were working on something similar.

FM CRMXIF_COND_REC_SLIM_SAVE not updating conditions table

Hi All,
Even I am using the FM CRMXIF_COND_REC_SLIM_SAVE to update conditions in the conditions table SAP004 and SAPSC012 , but for me the conditions are getting updated in table SAPSC012 but not SAP004.
I want to update using the conditoin record guid and want to
update the condition rate value.
Can anyone please help .
Thanks,
Poonam.

Hi Hemanth,
I am using the same FM CRMXIF_COND_REC_SLIM_SAVE to Insert the condition record. In my case, the condition recording getting Inserted and it matches with the Price date and if already exist the put the 'd' as deletion mark and recreate the new condition record.
Similarly I want to delete the Condition record (without Inserting, only 'd' mark should to be updated).
Can you pls help me to solve this issue.
Thanks
Shankar
For Inserting...
=============================================
ls_vardata-fieldname = 'AAAAA'.
ls_vardata-fieldvalue = 'DE7Bdfd1844F001999586C37'.
APPEND ls_vardata TO lt_vardata.
ls_vardata-fieldname = 'KBETR_PRT'.
ls_vardata-fieldvalue = '30'.
APPEND ls_vardata TO lt_vardata.
ls_vardata-fieldname = 'KONWA'.
ls_vardata-fieldvalue = '%'.
APPEND ls_vardata TO lt_vardata.
ls_vardata-fieldname = 'DATE_FROM'.
ls_vardata-fieldvalue = '20090730'.
APPEND ls_vardata TO lt_vardata.
MOVE lt_vardata TO ls_entry-cond_record-variable_fields.
ls_entry-cond_record-object_task    = 'M'.
ls_entry-cond_record-ct_application = 'CRM'.
ls_entry-cond_record-ct_usage       = 'PR'.
ls_entry-cond_record-cond_table_id = 'ABC90012'.
ls_entry-cond_record-cond_type      = 'YSHA'.
ls_entry-object_representation      = 'E'.
APPEND ls_entry TO ls_data.
CALL FUNCTION 'CRMXIF_COND_REC_SLIM_SAVE'
EXPORTING
    data   = ls_data
IMPORTING
    return = lt_return.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
IMPORTING
return        = lt_ret.
For Deleting..... I have tried with below code but its not working.
===================================================
ls_vardata-fieldname = 'AAAAA'.
ls_vardata-fieldvalue = 'DE7B43423AE659F1844F001999586C37'.
APPEND ls_vardata TO lt_vardata.
MOVE lt_vardata TO ls_entry-cond_record-variable_fields.
ls_entry-cond_record-object_task    = 'D'.
ls_entry-cond_record-cond_table_entry_id   = 'DE7CECCB980CA6F1844F001999586C37'.
ls_entry-cond_record-ct_application = 'CRM'.
ls_entry-cond_record-ct_usage       = 'PR'.
ls_entry-cond_record-cond_table_id = 'ABC90012'.
ls_entry-cond_record-cond_type      = 'YSHA'.
ls_entry-object_representation      = 'E'.
APPEND ls_entry TO ls_data.
CALL FUNCTION 'CRMXIF_COND_REC_SLIM_SAVE'
EXPORTING
    data   = ls_data
IMPORTING
    return = lt_return.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
IMPORTING
    return = lt_ret.

PL/SQL Trying to update a table through trigger on the same table

Hi everyone my name is Edwin and I'm new to this forum. I hope I can learn a lot from this community and over time contribute to it.
The problem I'm facing at the moment is a tough one. I need to update a table (table a) with a value called block_id. This block_id is generated by a procedure I have written myself, the end result is stored in another table (table b). This block_id needs to be generated after certain rows of table a get updated with a trans_id. The trans_id is all the same for these rows in table a, but the generated block_id isn't. In my code I use an after update on collumn a of table a trigger. So if the the collumn gets updated the trigger fires. The trigger calls the procedure that generates the block_id and the procedure generates table b with all the block_id's. But then I want to update the rows in table a with the generated block_id in table b. The problem is that this self-deadlocks.
You might think that this would call a recursive trigger, but I have written code in the trigger that checks if the block_id isn't allready filled in on table a.
Also I really need all the values wich get updated (table a), so I believe a before update is also out of the question.
And the first update of table a is done through an erp-packet and I can't get at that code, otherwise I would just have run my code from there.
Message was edited by:
user625855

CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER block_id_trigger AFTER UPDATE ON unload_details_tab
DECLARE
current_transport_id NUMBER;
check_value NUMBER;
check_block_id NUMBER;
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
BEGIN
current_transport_id := get_curent_trans_id; --function that gets the current transport_id
check_value := check_site_and_directive(current_transport_id); --function checks if this transport_id should have a block_id
check_block_id := check_for_block_id(current_transport_id); --function checks if there isn't allready a block_id set.
IF check_value = 1 AND check_block_id = 0 THEN
create_blok_id_table(current_transport_id); --this procedure creates the blok_id in temptable
UPDATE unload_details_tab a SET a.block_id = (SELECT DISTINCT b.blok_id FROM temptable b WHERE b.mark = a.mark_1) WHERE a.transport_id = current_transport_id; --this statement should update the table back, if I leave it out everything works fine, but when I leave it I get the self-deadlock error.
ELSE
null;
END IF;
END block_id_trigger;
Ok, I cleaned the code somewhat.
user625855

After ios5 update to my iPhone 4 - missing the quick access camera icon on lock screen. Any suggestions?

I downloaded the iOS 5 for my iPhone 4 with, it seemed, no problems. However, I'm missing the quick access camera icon on the lock screen. Any thoughts to moving forward?

Hi, have you double clicked the home button while the iPhone is in lock screen?

'Business Partner Assigned to the User' Access Sequence don't work

Hello.
I use access sequence 0008 (Business Partner Assigned to the User) in my Partner determination procedure. But it doesn't work. Corresponding Partner field in service document is empty. But I need that BP linked with logon user filled it.
I've made the same settings on another incstanse of SM and it's work. And what the difference between I don't understand.
Edited by: Dmitry Udot on Feb 13, 2011 2:31 AM

Sorry, but I don't quite get it. My purpose is to have 9 policies all working all the time (they did at in one version of firmware). I don't care about time entries for these. All 9 policies are full of keywords and websites to block webpages related to porn to one degree or another. The 10th policy is time-based to prevent internet access altogether for one or two computers through the wee hours of the morning. This, all in leu of having no parental controls.
Again, it would help if there was more detailed documentation on how this all works. This is the first I am aware that time settings in one policy could affect or impede the operation of other policies. How am I supposed to know this?
In any case, I appreciate your assistance and looking into this for me. But can you now tell me how to make it work so the policies will work as I want - the first 9 around the clock all the time, and the 10th one only from 1:30 am to 8:00 am (every day). Please instruct me on how I am supposed to configure this to work, and what specific settings I am supposed to enter... if it is even possible. Or is there another way of accomplishing this on my WRT54G (Rev. 2) product? Thanks.
Perry

How to update a table of contents when the feature "update table of contents" is unavailable?

Hello folks,
I've been struggling all morning with this issue and am completely desperate.
First, some info:
- I am making a spanish versions of an english documents: everything in the original doc was then edited, including TOCs. What I got at first, was a first spanish document already filled with spanish content.
- I was not the primary creative of the document I'm workin on and am unable to get in touch with whoever that can be.
- My document is a 200 pages text only document, with 12 chapters and, at the beginning of each chapter, a specific TOC for that very chapter.
- Inside each chapter, there are only Sections and Subsections, no other style. Those are the two levels in the TOCs.
- There is also a General TOC at the beginning of the document: that one only shows the Chapter names and the page number where to locate them.
My problem:
- Somewhere along the way, from one doc to another, the TOCs stopped to update the page numbers automatically.
- Now I have sections and subsections that are shown in one page (for instance 204) but they actually are on page 135.
- When I try to update the TOCs, I stand on the TOC itself as I was told in many tutorials, but the "update table of contents" feature is unavailable, even in the main TOC at the very beginning of the doc.
It is like if I wasn't standing in the actual TOC, but there is no actual TOC anywhere that I could refer to.
What can I do? I am changing the wrong page numbers manually but, of course, that is not ideal... and it may become more and more tricky while I keep producing new documents each based on the previous one.
Any help will be much appreciated.
Warm regard from sunny Paris, France!
Sasha

You've just confused me.
My understanding of how this is set up is that either:
This is a book, and there is a master TOC that includes all book documents and a document-specific TOC in each component file, or
This is a single file and there is one master TOC that includes all sections and a section-specific TOC that includes only the individual section.
In the first case, I think you would want two TOC styles set up, one that includes the chapter heads (if I understood how you said this worked) for the for the master, and you would include all docs in the book when you generate it, and a second style for the individual chapters, with the subheadings you want to include.
In the second case, it would be similar, but instead of only one style to cover the section TOCS, I think you would need to create a unique set of pargraph styles for the headings in each section (they can all be the same format, based one section, just with unique names), and then make a TOC style for each section that includes only the styles from that section.
OK, wait a sec. I just reread what you said: "Another thing: when the numbers are "linked" and updating well, they display indide a little box. Not a text box, but a kind of little frame around the numbers. That frame makes it imposible to delete just one number: when the TOC says that Section 6.1 is in page 135, for example, you cannot delete just the 5, it deletes, not just the 3 numbers, but also the doted tab."
I think these are NOT normal TOCs created by using Layout > TOC (but you could replace them with ones that are, if you set up your styles properly and the text you want to include is appearing on the pages). Those little boxes you mention sound like cross-references, which should update automatically without any intervention at all. Unfortunately, cross-refs can be flakey, especially if they point to another document. I'd open the cross-refs panel and see if you need to recreate a bunch of links.

Condition Table Link to Condition Types

Please Explain me How it is logical/useful/consistent to assign a particular Condition Table to More than One Condition Types ( Via Access Sequence).

As access sequence is used to find valid data for a particular condition type. It determines the sequence in which the system searches for data, as the accesses tell the system where to look first, second, and so on, until it finds a valid condition record [maintained in condition table fields] for the condition types.
<b>Example:</b>
Condition table 001 is for Sales org/Plant
Access seq A001 is having the following search
Sales Org/Dist channel/division
Sales Org/Plant [001]
Access sequence A002 is having the following search
Sales Org/Dist channel/division
Sales Org/Country
Sales Org/Plant[001]
Sales Org/Sold-to
Now the condition table 001 is defined in access sequence A001 and A002 at different level and these access sequence would be used for different condition types.
The same condition table can be used in different access sequence and at different level also depending on the business need and avoiding repeation of data.
Hope this clear your query, Reward Points if resolution appropriate for you.
Regards,
Gaurav

Testing sales groups/condition table

Hi all
For one sinario I have created some new sales groups and assigned to the existing sales offices.
other sinatio I have created new condition table and assigned to the existing acces sequence.
If I want to do testing what steps do i need to carry out from sd side, i want to prepare the test script for these two sinarios, please advise what testing steps should be done..
thanks
satish

Dear Satish,
Regarding sales group testing
First you prepare the document what data need for testing and what is the result data after that.
You just create sales order for a specific sales area in that sales order you check sales office is coming properly and check sales group which is coming in that sales order.
You can check in the header level as well as item level go to menu Go To -->Header or Item --->Click in Sales tab here you can find sales office and sales group.
Regarding acces sequence testing
ou assign that access sequence to your condition type then create condition record in VK11 transaction with the key combination of newly created condition table.
Now you create sales order check the price are executing by the syten as per the key combination or not.
I hope it will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Payer in condition table

After including the payer in condition table, I tried to insert into access sequence. But I get the following error
"The field assignment has not yet been made".
Could someone give some insights.
Thanks
Suddu

when you have an access sequence you need to may all the fields to fields that are available in the tables and structures. Since some fields are available at the header and item level you have to tell the system which field is to be used for this particular access sequence.
In the access sequence transaction when you get to the field level
selecet each field and then select FIELD CATALOGUE and assigne the required field to the field that you have selected.

Error updating the table condition table 372 in J1IIN

Hello all,
I am facing the problem in the transaction code J1IIN (In CIN).
I have maintained the condition type JEXP ( A/R BED %) as 16% with the Key combination Country/Plant/Control Code (Table 357). While iam saving the Excise invoice the system is throwing the error like Error updating the table condition table 372
I have gone through the post given by Ms. Jyoti few days back and tried to do some changes in the customisation.
I tried to maintain a different access sequence for the condition type JEXP i.e In the access sequence except condition table 372, I have maintained all other condition tables.
Still the error is persisiting. Can anyone put some light on the issue.
I have even traced the values being hit in the tables directly. There is no relation of table 372, then why is it being cause of the error.
Gurus plz give ur suggestions.
Thanks
Srinivas

Hello Srinivas/Sandeep
Please ensure that access sequence in the condition type JEXC has got the table 372. If it is not there please maintain it.
The standard access sequence used in all duty condition type
is JEXC which has got the table 372 this will get updated once
you save your excise invoice.
If the issue is resolved, kinldy close the message.
Regards
MBS

Error Updating table condition table 372 in J1IIN

Hello all,
I am facing the problem while working in ECC 6.0 environment in the transaction code J1IIN.
I have maintained the condition type JEXP ( A/R BED %) as 14% with the Key combination Country/Plant/Control Code (Table 357). While iam saving the Excise invoice the system is throwing the error like error updating the table condition table 372
I have gone through the post given by Ms. Jyoti few days back and tried to do some changes in the customisation.
I tried to maintain a different access sequence for the condition type JEXP i.e a new Access sequence(ZJEX) and also a new condition tpe (ZJEP). We don't have other Excise condition type in our Pricing procedure.
In the access sequence except condition table 372, I have maintained all other condition tables.
Still the error is persisiting. Can anyone put some light on the issue.
I have even traced the values being hit in the tables directly. There is no relation of table 372, then why is it being cause of the error.
Also while debugging it gives a message "An exception (CX_BADI_INITIAL_REFERENCE) occured".
Does this help in anyways.
Gurus plz give u r suggestions.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Karthik.

Hello Srinivas/Sandeep
Please ensure that access sequence in the condition type JEXC has got the table 372. If it is not there please maintain it.
The standard access sequence used in all duty condition type
is JEXC which has got the table 372 this will get updated once
you save your excise invoice.
If the issue is resolved, kinldy close the message.
Regards
MBS

Service Tax Condition record - Table-3 and access sequence MWST

Dear All,
For maintaining the service tax conditon record , it is required to have the condition record to maintain under Tax classification table, which is available in access sequence MWST or we can add this condition table( table no :3) in any other access sequence and that access sequence needs to be assigned in Service tax condition type i.e JSRT, becasue system will check the rates from the table A003 while doing the service tax transfer from intermediate account to service tax account in report RFUMSV50.
But the issue in there is NO validity period defined in the condition table : 3 , which signifies that we can not maintain the service tax condition record along with the validity period.
Is there any way , we can add validity period field in Tax classification table.
and how can we see the maintainace of Taxes table , is there any T.code avaiable for the same, as I could't find the same.\
Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards
Nitin

Hi Nitin,
SD can give validity period for a tax code either for an individual customer or for all the customers through their pricing conditions.
Aravind

Update condition table A846 belonging to the MWST access sequence

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for