Upload Gives False Result

I am running Dreamweaver CS3 on Mac OS X 10.5.5. I have only
one site defined and have had no problems up until now. Now, I
cannot upload to the site.
1. When I click on the remote icon to connect to the site,
the connection appears to work and all of my files on the remote
site show up in the "Remote Site" window, just as before.
2. If I update a file in the "Local Files" window and then
drag it to the "Remote Site" window, a progress window pops up
indicating that the file is transferring and then the window goes
away, indicating successful transfer. The date on the file in the
"Remote Site" window indicates successful transfer. However, when I
use my browser on my site the file has not been updated.
3. I tried defining a new file and uploading that. The
"Remote Site" window indicates the page is now up on my site, but
again, I can't get there through my browser.
So Dreamweaver thinks the uploads are taking place, but I
can't get them through my browser. The site definition is unchanged
so far as I can tell when I go to "Manage Sites" in Dreamweaver.
Really need help on this one.

Martin_H. wrote:
For instance, how do you write this query in ANSI syntax without adding the column PROD_ID into the on clause and avoide breaking the outer join:
select t.TIME_ID, s.time_id
from    times t
,sales s
where   t.time_id = s.time_id(+)
and   s.PROD_ID(+) = 22If you use the ANSI syntax and exclude a column from the on clause it will break the outer join. I personally exclude any column from the on clause, which definitely stands not for a join column and therefore I do not know how to use the ANSI syntax for outer joins without breaking them.
select t.TIME_ID, s.time_id
from    times t
left outer join sales s on (t.time_id) = ((s.time_id))
where   s.PROD_ID = 22 // how to tell oracle to outer join s.prod_id within the where clauseRegards,
Martin
Edited by: Martin_H. on 30-Jul-2010 02:01Ah I see your problem. But you are restricting yourself by saying that the condition should not belong into the ON clause. This would be the usual solution.
However this is not a technical restriction because of the ansi syntax but a restriction that you impose upon you by yourself.
how to tell oracle to outer join s.prod_id
select t.TIME_ID, s.time_id
from    times t
left outer join sales s on t.time_id = s.time_id and s.PROD_ID = 22I think this is abosolutly ok to write it like that. From a logic point of view it means:
Find all times and show me if there had been sales for product 22.
what should also work is
how to tell oracle to outer join s.prod_id within the where clause
select t.TIME_ID, s.time_id
from times t
left outer join sales s on t.time_id = s.time_id
where (s.PROD_ID = 22 or s.PROD_ID is null)It means:
Find all times and show me if there had been sales
I only want to see sales for product 22.
Edited by: Sven W. on Jul 30, 2010 11:09 AM

Similar Messages

Custom search using boolean attribute set to True gives no result

I am setting up an auto-query using the custom search portlet. This is to show all items where a boolean custom attribute is checked, ie = True.
In step 3 I have tried to set the operator to Equals to and the default value to True. This gives no results even though several items have this attribute set to True.
The Auto Query check box is checked.

Found that True = 1 in database. When set to this the search works.

P/L A/c for a single day gives different results for different users

Hi!
     We have SAP B1 8.81 (PL 09) in our office. P/L Account for a particular date gives different value for a single account (Other Income Account) for one user and a consistent value for all other users. The user in question is a super user and does not seem to pick a specific entry posted in the Other Income Account for that day thus giving erroneous result. I have checked the Trial Balance for that day and it gives proper result. Only the P/L account gives erroneous data. Could anyone help with the reason for this.
Thanks
Sreekumar

Hi Jitin,
          Thanks for your reply.
          I tried the way you mentioned. However, the result is the same.
          The entry that I'm talking about is an automatic journal entry posted through the Outgoing Payment option.
          To make it more clear, an outgoing payment to a vendor was posted on 05/19/11 for 1,42,178.32. The check was drawn only for 71,089.16 which was the correct amount and the remaining amount (71,089.16) got posted in the Other Income account. The P/L account for this date is not picking the amount of 71,089.16 in the Other Income Account.
Thanks & Regards
Sreekumar
Edited by: Sreekumar on Jan 31, 2012 5:58 PM

Picking returns false results when aspect ratio is different from 1:1

Hi,
When using picking with perspective projection when the aspect ratio is different from 1:1 I get false results.
Any idea how to fix it ?
Thanks
Ophir
Following is the related code:
// For the perspective projection
Transform3D prespective = new Transform3D();
prespective.perspective(hFov, Math.tan(hFov/2)/Math.tan(vFov/2), 1f, 30f);
view.setProjectionPolicy(View.PERSPECTIVE_PROJECTION);
view.setLeftProjection(prespective);
// Picking code
Point3d eye_pos = new Point3d();
Point3d mouse_pos = new Point3d();
canvas.getCenterEyeInImagePlate(eye_pos);
canvas.getPixelLocationInImagePlate(x, y, mouse_pos);
Transform3D motion = new Transform3D();
canvas.getImagePlateToVworld(motion);
motion.transform(eye_pos);
motion.transform(mouse_pos);
Vector3d direction = new Vector3d(mouse_pos);
direction.sub(eye_pos);
PickRay ray = new PickRay(eye_pos, direction);

I tried to download the FireFox setup from both locations you mentioned. I could not reproduce your problem. Always the same file with the same MD5 hash:
C:\tmp>md5sum "Firefox Setup 18.0.2.exe
181ac7211db54e793845e8c7216c1a8b *Firefox Setup 18.0.2.exe
Is it still reproducible from your location? Where are you located?

Enterprise Manager does not give correct results

I am using version 9.0.2.0.1 core edition(oc4j & web-cache).
My application consists of business components, java beans and jsp. It is running fine.
Oracle enterprise manager is not giving correct results of memory/cpu usage by oc4j_home and bc4j.
Some times it does not gives result, when i refresh it twice or thrice it shows results.
But results are not correct. On each refresh it gives different results.
Then it is very hard to find which resuslt is correct.
waiting for response,
Tahir.

i have been using 9iAS versions 102*, 90200, 90201, and now using 903.
As stated above, some times the results for oc4j_home is displayed.
But the memory/cpu usage for bc4j is never shown.
Also, its radio-button is always disabled. while its status is "running".
On BC4J page, it also shows results of application modules created. But these results are usually wrong.
How bc4j will be enabled, and how its memory results can be get ???
Tahir.

Calling PL/SQL Procedure In Another Schema Gives Unexpected Result

I have a SQL Script that does this:
conn pnr/<password for user pnr>;
set serveroutput on;
exec vms.disable_all_fk_constraints;
SELECT owner, constraint_name, status FROM user_constraints WHERE constraint_type = 'R';
and the disable_all_fk_constraints procedure that is owned by user 'vms' is defined as:
create or replace
procedure disable_all_fk_constraints is
v_sql VARCHAR2(4000);
begin
dbms_output.put_line('Disabling all referential integrity constraints.');
for rec in (SELECT table_name, constraint_name FROM user_constraints WHERE constraint_type='R') loop
dbms_output.put_line('Disabling constraint ' || rec.constraint_name || ' from ' || rec.table_name || '.');
v_sql := 'ALTER TABLE ' || rec.table_name || ' DISABLE CONSTRAINT ' || rec.constraint_name;
execute immediate(v_sql);
end loop;
end;
When I run the SQL script, the call to vms.disable_all_fk_constraints disables the FK constrains in the 'vms' schema, whereas I wanted it to disable the FK constraints in the 'pnr' schema (the invoker of the procedure). I know that I could make this work by copying the disable_all_fk_constraints procedure to the 'pnr' schema and calling it as "+exec disable_all_fk_constraints;+" from within the SQL script but I want to avoid having to duplicate the PL/SQL procedure in each schema that uses it.
What can I do?
Thank you

You have two issues to solve.
First you need to write a packaged procedure that works with INVOKER rights. The default is DEFINER rights.
The difference is excatly what you need. Usually the package has the rights from the schema where it is defined (=Definer rights). In your case schema VMS. Whereas you need the privileges from the user that calls the package (PNR).
=> Check out the documentation for INVOKER rights
The second problem is that the view "user_constraints" will not give the results you expect when called from inside a procedure in another schema. An alternative could be to use the view DBA_CONSTRAINTS with a filter on the owner (where owner = 'PNR'). Not sure if there are other working possibilities. Well you could create a list of constraint names that you want to disable, instead of creating the list dynamically.
And you could have another potential disaster creeping up upon you. If you run this thing, then at this moment you don't have any referential integrity anymore. You can't be sure that you can create the FKs again after this action. This is EXTREMLY DANGEROUS. I would never ever do this in any kind of production or test database. I would be very careful when I do it on a development database.

0I_FYPER - Variable in BEx gives no result

Hello all,
I have a problem in BEx-reporting after a releasechange from BW3.5 to BI7.0 and at the same time SEM-BCS4.0 to SEM-BCS6.0 which belongs to the variable 0I_FYPER. I use this variable in the columns (only) in order to give the user the possibillity to define which periods to show. In the rows I use the rest for defining which numbers to bring up. It worked in BW3.5/SEM-BCS4.0 fine.
I debuged the content of the variable in user-exit ZXRSRU01 (after processing the selection screen) and could find the data I entered but the query gives no result. Any ideas?
Thank you for any feedback,
Chris

Hi Guru,
We have a work around for your issue. Just create a customer Exit variable on the calendar month and use it in the filter.
In the customer Exit variable read the Plant variable and if it is empty populate # as result. Else read the calmonth input variable and populate it as the result.
Use the following snippet to read input ready variables.
DATA: loc_var_range LIKE rrrangeexit.
READ TABLE i_t_var_range WITH KEY vnam = 'VARNAME' INTO loc_var_range.
(loc_var_range-low will have the value of the variable)
Hope this helps.
Regards.
Shafi.

Uploading time evaluation results from third party system

Hi,
Our customer is using a third party system for time evaluation as well as SAP time evaluation. Now they would like to upload the evaluation results from that system into their SAP system, so that all the data can be viewed in the same place for statistical purposes. Is this possible? And if yes, how is it accomplished?

PL take a look at this Re: Time Inbound Interface
Regards,
Suresh Datti

Do IMAQ Cast Image or IMAQ Linear averages give different results when using different computers that are running under Windows XP ?

Hello
I'm currently developping an image processing algorithm using Labview 7.1 and the associated IMAQ Vision tools. After several tests, I found a weird result. Indeed, I put the labview algorithm - including the IMAQ VI on the library to get sure that I use all the time the same VI - on my memory stick and used it on two different computers. I tested the same picture (still in my memory stick) and had two very different results.
After several hours trying to understand why, I found that there were a difference between the results given by both computers at the very begining of the algorithm. Indeed, I used a JPEG file.
To open it, I first create an Image with IMAQ Create (U8). Then, I open it.
Then in my first sub-VI, I use IMAQ Cast Image to be sure that the picture is a U8 grayscale picture.
Right after that, I use the IMAQ Linear Averages. The results of this VI are different on the two computers.
I tried several time on the same picture : one computer always give me the same result but the two computers give me a different result. So there is no random variable on the results.
So my question is : Do IMAQ Cast Image or IMAQ Linear averages give different results when using different computers that are running under Windows XP ?
My bet is on IMAQ Cast Image but I'm not quite sure and I do not undestand why. The labview and IMAQ are the same on both computers.
The difference between the two computer are above :
Computer 1 :
Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz with a RAM of 1Go. The processor is an Intel(R).
The OS is windows XP Pro 2002
Computer 2 :
Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz with a RAM of 512Mo. The processor is an Intel(R).
The OS is windows XP Pro 2002.
If anybody can help me on this problem, it would be really helpful.
Regards
Florence P.

Hi,
Indeed it's a strange behaviour, could you send me your VI and your JPEG file, (or another file that reproduces) so that I could check this inthere ?
I'll then try to find out what's happening.
Regards
Richard Keromen
National Instruments France
#adMrkt{text-align: center;font-size:11px; font-weight: bold;} #adMrkt a {text-decoration: none;} #adMrkt a:hover{font-size: 9px;} #adMrkt a span{display: none;} #adMrkt a:hover span{display: block;}
>> Découvrez, en vidéo, les innovations technologiques réalisées en éco-conception

NonLinearFitWithMaxIters does not give correct results for phase

Dear all,
I am trying to fit a sin cuve with NonLinearFitWithMaxIters function of labwindows, but the results given by this function are dispersed a lot (the function does not give same results).
In fact, I have two waveforms signals v and i (of 104 points), and I find the phase between the two signals with NonLinearFitWithMaxIters.
The two singals v and i are measured with an osciloscope.
I use the following fit functions :
v=p1*sin(wt+p2) ;
i=p3*sin(wt+p4) ;
I use the NonLinearFitWithMaxIters function to fit the data and to have the parameters p1, p2, p3, p4. Then, the phase is claculated as follow phase=p4-p3.
The problem is that the phase calculted between the two signals (v and i) is different for each run for the same conditions.
In fact, for a same condition, I measure different times the signals v and i, and I calculate the phase p4-p3, using NonLinearFitWithMaxIters. The goal is to calculate a mean of phases for the same condition. For example, there are cases where the phase=-5 degree, and other cases when phase=12 degree.
For ten measures of v and i, the phase calculated is different. I get a big dispersion between the phases.
I would like to know please why I have a big difference in phases calculated with the same condition?whern using NonLinearFitWithMaxIters.
I read that this function does not give all time the correct results, is there a way to know when the results are not corrects and when they are correct ?
And is there any solution to find accuratly the phase between the two waveforms.
Thank you for your precious answer.

The pseudocode which I am using is :
v_err=NonLinearFitWithMaxIters(array_x,array_v,v_y_fit,1252,100,sinus,v_coef,2,&v_mean_squareError);
The fit function is
double sinus(double x, double a[],int noef){
return (a[0]*sin((w*x)+a[1]));
I use the same inital coeficient of v_coef for each run :
v_coef[0]=0.03;
v_coef[1]=0.2;
These coeficient are choosen arbitrary.
In this case, the number of points of the data is 1252 (the data of array_v).
The number of iterations is 100.
For the array_x, the distance between adjacents values of the array is dt=0.4*1e-9(difference between array_x[i] anv array_x[i+1]=dt=0.4*1e-9 ).
for (i=0;i<1252;i++){
array_x[i]=i*(0.4*1e-9);
The means square error returnned by the function when it is complished is small, of the order of 0,001.
I read the help
« From the help:
You must pass a pointer to the nonlinear function f(x,a) along with a set of initial guess coefficients a. NonLinearFitWithMaxIters does not always give the correct answer. The correct output sometimes depends on the initial choice of a. It is very important to verify the final result.
That means that the function cannot be used, as it does not give correct results. How
can we check if the results are good or not ? in my case.
I think that in my case, the function does not give correct results, but how can I check if the results are good, or not ? The mean square error is small.

Where to upload test case results in SAP Solution Manager?

Hi Experts,
I am new to test management module in SAP Solution Manager. I need to know where to upload test case results in sap solution manager.
Please provide screenshots on how to upload test results.
Regards,
Sanjana

Hi Sanjan,
let me provide you some more information.
First of all you create a SAP Solution Manager Project in Transaction SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN. I think this should be no problem. After creating the Project, make sure that the tap "Test Cases" is switched on in this project. The tap "Test Cases" is the tap below "Project Standards".
Go to transaction "solar02" and choose your created project. Find the tap "Test Cases" and upload a sample file. Please note that the configuration structure of this project can be configured in solar01 (Business Blueprint). There are many settings you can choose in a project regarding ti your requirements. Try to find them out! :-)
In transaction Test Plan Management (STWB_2) you can choose all relevant test cases you uploaded in your project and generate Test Packages which are mapped to your choosen Testers.
In Transaction stwb_work you will see the testers workbench.
Best regrads
J.Eichner

False result of decode within max()

hallo,
I'm using decode within a max() on an outer joined column. Further on, I'm outer joining multiple tables and therefore I'm executing a kind of the following query on my database (Oracle 10g R2). Finally, the query returns a false result:
Query:
select max(t.TIME_ID), max(decode(s.promo_id, null,null, t.TIME_ID)) test_date
from sales s
 ,times t
where s.TIME_ID(+) = t.TIME_ID
and s.PROD_ID(+) = 22
and t.TIME_ID <= to_date('10021998', 'ddmmyyyy')
order by t.time_id;Result:
MAX(T.TIM TEST_DATE
10-FEB-98 31-JAN-98If you omit the aggregate functions, you can see that the result is not correct:
31-JAN-98 31-JAN-98
31-JAN-98 31-JAN-98
01-FEB-98
02-FEB-98 02-FEB-98
03-FEB-98 03-FEB-98
03-FEB-98 03-FEB-98
04-FEB-98
05-FEB-98
06-FEB-98
07-FEB-98 07-FEB-98
08-FEB-98 08-FEB-98
09-FEB-98
10-FEB-98 10-FEB-98
10-FEB-98 10-FEB-98Can anyone help me?
Thanks

Martin_H. wrote:
For instance, how do you write this query in ANSI syntax without adding the column PROD_ID into the on clause and avoide breaking the outer join:
select t.TIME_ID, s.time_id
from times t
,sales s
where t.time_id = s.time_id(+)
and s.PROD_ID(+) = 22If you use the ANSI syntax and exclude a column from the on clause it will break the outer join. I personally exclude any column from the on clause, which definitely stands not for a join column and therefore I do not know how to use the ANSI syntax for outer joins without breaking them.
select t.TIME_ID, s.time_id
from times t
left outer join sales s on (t.time_id) = ((s.time_id))
where s.PROD_ID = 22 // how to tell oracle to outer join s.prod_id within the where clauseRegards,
Martin
Edited by: Martin_H. on 30-Jul-2010 02:01Ah I see your problem. But you are restricting yourself by saying that the condition should not belong into the ON clause. This would be the usual solution.
However this is not a technical restriction because of the ansi syntax but a restriction that you impose upon you by yourself.
how to tell oracle to outer join s.prod_id
select t.TIME_ID, s.time_id
from times t
left outer join sales s on t.time_id = s.time_id and s.PROD_ID = 22I think this is abosolutly ok to write it like that. From a logic point of view it means:
Find all times and show me if there had been sales for product 22.
what should also work is
how to tell oracle to outer join s.prod_id within the where clause
select t.TIME_ID, s.time_id
from times t
left outer join sales s on t.time_id = s.time_id
where (s.PROD_ID = 22 or s.PROD_ID is null)It means:
Find all times and show me if there had been sales
I only want to see sales for product 22.
Edited by: Sven W. on Jul 30, 2010 11:09 AM

Select for update gives wrong results. Is it a bug?

Hi,
Select for update gives wrong results. Is it a bug?
CREATE TABLE TaxIds
TaxId NUMBER(6) NOT NULL,
LocationId NUMBER(3) NOT NULL,
Status NUMBER(1)
PARTITION BY LIST (LocationId)
PARTITION P111 VALUES (111),
PARTITION P222 VALUES (222),
PARTITION P333 VALUES (333)
ALTER TABLE TaxIds ADD ( CONSTRAINT PK_TaxIds PRIMARY KEY (TaxId));
CREATE INDEX NI_TaxIdsStatus ON TaxIds ( NVL(Status,0) ) LOCAL;
Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100101, 111, NULL);
Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100102, 111, NULL);
Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100103, 111, NULL);
Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100104, 111, NULL);
Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (200101, 222, NULL);
Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (200102, 222, NULL);
Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (200103, 222, NULL);
--Session_1 return TAXID=100101
select TAXID from TAXIDS where LOCATIONID=111 and NVL(STATUS,0)=0 AND rownum=1 for update
--Session_2 waits commit
select TAXID from TAXIDS where LOCATIONID=111 and NVL(STATUS,0)=0 AND rownum=1 for update
--Session_1
update TAXIDS set STATUS=1 Where TaxId=100101;
commit;
--Session_2 return 100101 opps!?
--Session_1 return TAXID=100102
select TAXID, STATUS from TAXIDS where LOCATIONID=111 and NVL(STATUS,0)=0 AND rownum=1 for update
--Session_2 waits commit
select TAXID, STATUS from TAXIDS where LOCATIONID=111 and NVL(STATUS,0)=0 AND rownum=1 for update
--Session_1
update TAXIDS set STATUS=1 Where TaxId=100102;
commit;
--Session_2 return 100103

This is a bug. Got to be a bug.
This should be nothing to do with indeterminate results from ROWNUM, and nothing to do with read consistency at the point of statement start time in session2., surely.
Session 2 should never return 100101 once the lock from session 1 is released.
The SELECT FOR UPDATE should restart and 100101 should not be selected as it does not meet the criteria of the select.
A statement restart should ensure this.
A number of demos highlight this.
Firstly, recall the original observation in the original test case.
Setup
SQL> DROP TABLE taxids;
Table dropped.
SQL>
SQL> CREATE TABLE TaxIds
2 (TaxId NUMBER(6) NOT NULL,
3   LocationId NUMBER(3) NOT NULL,
4   Status NUMBER(1))
5 PARTITION BY LIST (LocationId)
6 (PARTITION P111 VALUES (111),
7   PARTITION P222 VALUES (222),
8   PARTITION P333 VALUES (333));
Table created.
SQL>
SQL> ALTER TABLE TaxIds ADD ( CONSTRAINT PK_TaxIds PRIMARY KEY (TaxId));
Table altered.
SQL>
SQL> CREATE INDEX NI_TaxIdsStatus ON TaxIds ( NVL(Status,0) ) LOCAL;
Index created.
SQL>
SQL>
SQL> Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100101, 111, NULL);
1 row created.
SQL> Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100102, 111, NULL);
1 row created.
SQL> Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100103, 111, NULL);
1 row created.
SQL> Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (100104, 111, NULL);
1 row created.
SQL> Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (200101, 222, NULL);
1 row created.
SQL> Insert into TAXIDS (TAXID, LOCATIONID, STATUS) Values (200102, 222, NULL);
1 row created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> Original observation:
Session1>SELECT taxid
2 FROM   taxids
3 WHERE locationid    = 111
4 AND    NVL(STATUS,0) = 0
5 AND    ROWNUM        = 1
6 FOR UPDATE;
     TAXID
    100101
Session1>
--> Session 2 with same statement hangs until
Session1>BEGIN
2   UPDATE taxids SET status=1 WHERE taxid=100101;
3   COMMIT;
4 END;
5 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Session1>
--> At which point, Session 2 returns
Session2>SELECT taxid
2 FROM   taxids
3 WHERE locationid    = 111
4 AND    NVL(STATUS,0) = 0
5 AND    ROWNUM        = 1
6 FOR UPDATE;
     TAXID
    100101
Session2>There's no way that session 2 should have returned 100101. That is the point of FOR UPDATE. It completely reintroduces the lost UPDATE scenario.
Secondly, what happens if we drop the index.
Let's reset the data and drop the index:
Session1>UPDATE taxids SET status=0 where taxid=100101;
1 row updated.
Session1>commit;
Commit complete.
Session1>drop index NI_TaxIdsStatus;
Index dropped.
Session1>Then try again:
Session1>SELECT taxid
2 FROM   taxids
3 WHERE locationid    = 111
4 AND    NVL(STATUS,0) = 0
5 AND    ROWNUM        = 1
6 FOR UPDATE;
     TAXID
    100101
Session1>
--> Session 2 hangs again until
Session1>BEGIN
2   UPDATE taxids SET status=1 WHERE taxid=100101;
3   COMMIT;
4 END;
5 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Session1>
--> At which point in session 2:
Session2>SELECT taxid
2 FROM   taxids
3 WHERE locationid    = 111
4 AND    NVL(STATUS,0) = 0
5 AND    ROWNUM        = 1
6 FOR UPDATE;
     TAXID
    100102
Session2>Proves nothing, Non-deterministic ROWNUM you say.
Then let's reset, recreate the index and explicity ask then for row 100101.
It should give the same result as the ROWNUM query without any doubts over the ROWNUM, etc.
If the original behaviour was correct, session 2 should also be able to get 100101:
Session1>SELECT taxid
2 FROM   taxids
3 WHERE locationid    = 111
4 AND    NVL(STATUS,0) = 0
5 AND    taxid         = 100101
6 FOR UPDATE;
     TAXID
    100101
Session1>
--> same statement hangs in session 2 until
Session1>BEGIN
2   UPDATE taxids SET status=1 WHERE taxid=100101;
3   COMMIT;
4 END;
5 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Session1>
--> so session 2 stops being blocked and:
Session2>SELECT taxid
2 FROM   taxids
3 WHERE locationid    = 111
4 AND    NVL(STATUS,0) = 0
5 AND    taxid         = 100101
6 FOR UPDATE;
no rows selected
Session2>Of course, this is how it should happen, surely?
Just to double check, let's reintroduce ROWNUM but force the order by to show it's not about read consistency at the start of the statement - restart should prevent it.
(reset, then)
Session1> select t.taxid
2   from
3    (select taxid, rowid rd
4      from   taxids
5      where locationid = 111
6      and    nvl(status,0) = 0
7      order by taxid) x
8   , taxids t
9   where t.rowid = x.rd
10   and   rownum = 1
11   for update of t.status;
     TAXID
    100101
Session1>
--> Yes, session 2 hangs until...
Session1>BEGIN
2   UPDATE taxids SET status=1 WHERE taxid=100101;
3   COMMIT;
4 END;
5 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Session1>
--> and then
Session2> select t.taxid
2   from
3    (select taxid, rowid rd
4      from   taxids
5      where locationid = 111
6      and    nvl(status,0) = 0
7      order by taxid) x
8   , taxids t
9   where t.rowid = x.rd
10   and   rownum = 1
11   for update of t.status;
     TAXID
    100102
Session2>Session 2 should never be allowed to get 100101 once the lock is released.
This is a bug.
The worrying thing is that I can reproduce in 9.2.0.8 and 11.2.0.2.

[solved]lspci gives strange results

I just reinstalled, and am trying to get my wireless card up and running. I ran lspci, then lspci -nn, and it gives unexpected results. Instead of listing things like vendors and such as intel, and ralink, it just lists non-useful stuff in a format like this:
xx.xx.x Class [xxxx] Device [xxxx:xxxx] rev 40
(where all x's are digits)
what does this mean? where is the useful information that I was expecting to find (like actual device names)? What did I forget to do?
edit:
Now I have Xorg up, so I'll post the output:
lspci
00:00.0 Class 0600: Device 1002:5957
00:02.0 Class 0604: Device 1002:5978
00:09.0 Class 0604: Device 1002:597e
00:0a.0 Class 0604: Device 1002:597f
00:11.0 Class 0106: Device 1002:4390 (rev 40)
00:12.0 Class 0c03: Device 1002:4397
00:12.2 Class 0c03: Device 1002:4396
00:13.0 Class 0c03: Device 1002:4397
00:13.2 Class 0c03: Device 1002:4396
00:14.0 Class 0c05: Device 1002:4385 (rev 42)
00:14.1 Class 0101: Device 1002:439c (rev 40)
00:14.3 Class 0601: Device 1002:439d (rev 40)
00:14.4 Class 0604: Device 1002:4384 (rev 40)
00:14.5 Class 0c03: Device 1002:4399
00:15.0 Class 0604: Device 1002:43a0
00:16.0 Class 0c03: Device 1002:4397
00:16.2 Class 0c03: Device 1002:4396
00:18.0 Class 0600: Device 1022:1200
00:18.1 Class 0600: Device 1022:1201
00:18.2 Class 0600: Device 1022:1202
00:18.3 Class 0600: Device 1022:1203
00:18.4 Class 0600: Device 1022:1204
01:00.0 Class 0c03: Device 1033:0194 (rev 03)
02:00.0 Class 0200: Device 10ec:8168 (rev 06)
03:00.0 Class 0c00: Device 1106:3403 (rev 01)
04:00.0 Class 0300: Device 10de:0e22 (rev a1)
04:00.1 Class 0403: Device 10de:0beb (rev a1)
05:05.0 Class 0280: Device 1814:0301
05:06.0 Class 0401: Device 1102:0004 (rev 04)
05:06.1 Class 0980: Device 1102:7003 (rev 04)
05:06.2 Class 0c00: Device 1102:4001 (rev 04)
Last edited by Convergence (2012-06-07 02:48:41)

Falconinidy: You're right! That was a bad move. Thanks!

0CRM_OPPT_H (Transaction RSA3 gives wrong result)

Hi gurus,
0CRM_OPPT_H (Transaction RSA3 gives wrong result)
BBPCRM 4.0
BW 3.50 version
I had enhanced the structure "crmt_bw_oppt_h"
and also written a BADI to populate Opportunity header status.
But when I run extract checker RSA3 for CRM data,
I get wrong number of records.
I am having 95 records for Opportunities header data.
Data Records / Call = "100"
Display Extr. Calls = "10"
Above settings, I am retrieving only 61 records.
Data Records / Call = "1"
Display Extr. Calls = "200"
For the above settings in RSA3,
I am able to retrieve 95 records correctly.
The problem is that in RSA1 transaction of BW 3.50 server also,
61 records are being loaded from CRM server.
Could this be a Cache memory problem,
Are any of my BASIS settings a cause for this problem?
Any help is really appreciated and will be rewarded.
Thanks,
Aby Jacob
========

Dear Friends,
I had to do a small correction in my BADI code.
I got a solution from Online SAP HELP portal.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/eb/3e7cf4940e11d295df0000e82de14a/frameset.htm
Notes on BADI Usage
====================
The instance generated through the factory method should be declared
as globally as possible or generally be passed as a parameter
to ensure that the initialization process must be run as rarely as possible
just once would be best. In no case should you discard the instance as soon as
it is generated or repeatedly run the initialization process in a loop.
Within the adapter class interface,
required database accesses are buffered locally,
so that each access is executed once only.
However, repeated initialization makes
the buffer useless and dramatically reduces performance.
Due to the local buffering, you can call Business-Add-In methods
without having to expect considerable performance restrictions,
even if no active implementations exist.
Also, if the definition of the Business-Add-In is filter-dependent,
a single instance is sufficient.
However, you should not do without initialization altogether.
Even if you could call static methods of the implementing
class of the Business-Add-In implementation without an instance,
you would lose the benefit of performance improvement through
the Business-Add-Ins and the possibility of multiple use.
If you switch the method type in the interface from the static method
to the instance method at any time in the future,
many code adjustments are required.
In addition, you can no longer use default code that is provided.
Many Thanks to ROBIN
and the whole SDN team
Aby Jacob ,,,,,

Upload Gives False Result

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for