Upload limit exceeded
Trying to complete a document on echosign, cannot attach new files error message upload limit exceeded keep coming up.
Hello Okoyeiyke,
If the document you are uploading exceeds the limit size and pages, you will get this error. Here is the link for reference:
http://helpx.adobe.com/echosign/kb/transaction-limits.html
-Rijul
Similar Messages
-
Hi ,
I have a file to idoc scenario .
I have a file which generates many idocs (size atmost 5 mb)
I am aware sap recommends to limit the message the file size to atmost 5mb.
Do they mean file size of the payload ...because size increases in xi also .
I just want to process such a file quickly .
For that I am employing queue priortization at both sender and reciever .
and would idoc packaging help at the receiver .
Besides I am getting 'time limit exceeded in sm58' although I am seeing my idocs in idx5.
Here are some of the things I have checked ..
1) Parameters in SXMB_ADM - Integration Eningine configuration ---Specific configuration ...tried various tuning parameters ...but it didn't work..
2) In partner profile in recieving CRM system made chagend the setting from trigger immediately ..to background Task ...
(I am not certain how far that is relevant .
If it is a problem with CRM system's ability to accept mass idocs (because a small number is acceptible ...under 1mb file size ) then seetings should in crm so that large number idocs get succesfully posted .
I have posted this issue several times ...Kindlyhelp
KIndly what parameters i should tweak in xi or that matter recieving crm system to take care of this problem.
Kindly helpHI,
Large size of file processing
In general, an extra sizing for XI memory consumption is not required. The total memory of the SAP Web Application Server
should be sufficient except in the case of large messages (>1MB).
To determine the memory consumption for processing large messages, you can use the following rules of thumb:
Allocate 3 MB per process (for example, the number of parallel messages per second may be an indicator)
Allocate 4 kB per 1kB of message size in the asynchronous case or 9 kB per 1kB message size in the synchronous case
Example: asynchronous concurrent processing of 10 messages with a size of 1MB requires 70 MB of memory
(3MB + 4 * 1MB) * 10 = 70 MB With mapping or content-based routing where an internal representation of the message payload
may be necessary, the memory requirements can be much higher (possibly exceeding 20 kBytes per 1kByte
message, depending on the type of mapping).
The size of the largest message thus depends mainly on the size of the available main memory. On a normal 32Bit operating system, there is an upper boundary of approximately 1.5 to 2 GByte per process, limiting the respective largest message size.
please check these links..
/community [original link is broken]:///people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2006/06/08/xi-timeouts-timeouts-timeouts
Input Flat File Size Determination
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/04/03/xi-in-the-role-of-a-ftp
data packet size - load from flat file
How to upload a file of very huge size on to server.
Regards
Chilla -
Database error text.. "Resource limit exceeded. MSGID= Job=753531/IBPADM/WP05"
Hello All,
We are getting below runtime errors
Runtime Errors DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR
Exception CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB
Short text
SQL error in the database when accessing a table.
What can you do?
Note which actions and input led to the error.
For further help in handling the problem, contact your SAP administrator
You can use the ABAP dump analysis transaction ST22 to view and manage
termination messages, in particular for long term reference.
How to correct the error
Database error text........: "Resource limit exceeded. MSGID= Job=753531/IBPADM/WP05""
Internal call code.........: "[RSQL/OPEN/PRPS ]"
Please check the entries in the system log (Transaction SM21).
If the error occures in a non-modified SAP program, you may be able to
find an interim solution in an SAP Note.
If you have access to SAP Notes, carry out a search with the following
keywords:
"DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR" "CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB"
"SAPLCATL2" or "LCATL2U17"
"CATS_SELECT_PRPS"
If you cannot solve the problem yourself and want to send an error
notification to SAP, include the following information:
1. The description of the current problem (short dump)
To save the description, choose "System->List->Save->Local File
(Unconverted)".
2. Corresponding system log
Display the system log by calling transaction SM21.
Restrict the time interval to 10 minutes before and five minutes
after the short dump. Then choose "System->List->Save->Local File
(Unconverted)".
3. If the problem occurs in a problem of your own or a modified SAP
program: The source code of the program
In the editor, choose "Utilities->More
Utilities->Upload/Download->Download".
4. Details about the conditions under which the error occurred or which
actions and input led to the error.
System environment
SAP-Release 700
Application server... "SAPIBP0"
Network address...... "3.14.226.140"
Operating system..... "OS400"
Release.............. "7.1"
Character length.... 16 Bits
Pointer length....... 64 Bits
Work process number.. 5
Shortdump setting.... "full"
Database server... "SAPIBP0"
Database type..... "DB400"
Database name..... "IBP"
Database user ID.. "R3IBPDATA"
Terminal................. "KRSNBRB032"
Char.set.... "C"
SAP kernel....... 721
created (date)... "May 15 2013 01:29:20"
create on........ "AIX 1 6 00CFADC14C00 (IBM i with OS400)"
Database version. "DB4_71"
Patch level. 118
Patch text.. " "
Database............. "V7R1"
SAP database version. 721
Operating system..... "OS400 1 7"
Memory consumption
Roll.... 0
EM...... 12569376
Heap.... 0
Page.... 2351104
MM Used. 5210400
MM Free. 3166288
Information on where terminated
Termination occurred in the ABAP program "SAPLCATL2" - in "CATS_SELECT_PRPS".
The main program was "CATSSHOW ".
In the source code you have the termination point in line 67
of the (Include) program "LCATL2U17".
The termination is caused because exception "CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB" occurred in
procedure "CATS_SELECT_PRPS" "(FUNCTION)", but it was neither handled locally
nor declared
in the RAISING clause of its signature.
The procedure is in program "SAPLCATL2 "; its source code begins in line
1 of the (Include program "LCATL2U17 ".
The exception must either be prevented, caught within proedure
"CATS_SELECT_PRPS" "(FUNCTION)", or its possible occurrence must be declared in
the
RAISING clause of the procedure.
To prevent the exception, note the following:
SM21: Log
Database error -904 at PRE access to table PRPS
> Resource limit exceeded. MSGID= Job=871896/VGPADM/WP05
Run-time error "DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR" occurred
Please help
Regards,
UshaHi Usha
Could you check this SAP Notes
1930962 - IBM i: Size restriction of database tables
1966949 - IBM i: Runtime error DBIF_DSQL2_SQL_ERROR in RSDB4UPD
BR
SS -
PI 7.11 - SXI_CACHE Issue - SQL 0904 - Resource Limit Exceeded
Hi PI & IBM I Gurus,
We are having the SXI_CACHE issue in our PI 7.11 SPS04 system. When we try to do the delta cache refresh through SXI_CACHE, it is returning the error SQL 0904 - Resource limit exceeded. When we try to do the full cache refresh, it is getting the issue 'Application issue during request processing'.
We have cleaned up the SQL Packages with DLTR3PKG command, which did not resolve the issue. We recently performed a system copy to build the QA instance and I observed that the adapter engine cache for the development is presented in the QA instance and removed that cache from there.
I am not seeing the adapter engine connection data cache in our PI system. The adapter engine cache is working fine.
All the caches are working fine from the PI Administration page. The cache connectivity test is failing with the same error as I mentioned for the SXI_CACHE.
Please let me know if you have encountered any issue like this on IBM I 6.1 Platform.
Your help is highly appreciated.
Thanks
KalyanHi Kalyan,
SQL0904 has different reason codes ...
Which one are you seeing ?
Is the SQL pack really at its boundary of 1GB ?
... otherwise, it is perhaps a totally different issue ... then DLTR3PKG cannot help at all ...
If you should see this big SQL Package, you should use PRTSQLINF in order to see if there is more or less over and over the same SQL in, just with different host variables or so ...
If the last point should be the case, I would open a message with BC-DB-DB4 so that they can check how to help here or to talk to the application people to behave a bit different ...
Regards
Volker Gueldenpfennig, consolut international ag
http://www.consolut.com http://www.4soi.de http://www.easymarketplace.de -
PI 7.11 - SXI_CACHE Issue - SQL0904 - Resource limit exceeded
Hi IBM I Gurus,
We are having the SXI_CACHE issue in our PI 7.11 SPS04 system. When we try to do the delta cache refresh through SXI_CACHE, it is returning the error SQL 0904 - Resource limit exceeded. When we try to do the full cache refresh, it is getting the issue 'Application issue during request processing'.
We have cleaned up the SQL Packages with DLTR3PKG command, which did not resolve the issue. We recently performed a system copy to build the QA instance and I observed that the adapter engine cache for the development is presented in the QA instance and removed that cache from there.
I am not seeing the adapter engine connection data cache in our PI system. The adapter engine cache is working fine.
All the caches are working fine from the PI Administration page. The cache connectivity test is failing with the same error as I mentioned for the SXI_CACHE.
Please let me know if you have encountered any issue like this on IBM I 6.1 Platform.
Your help is highly appreciated.
Thanks
KalyanHi Kalyan,
SQL0904 has different reason codes ...
Which one are you seeing ?
Is the SQL pack really at its boundary of 1GB ?
... otherwise, it is perhaps a totally different issue ... then DLTR3PKG cannot help at all ...
If you should see this big SQL Package, you should use PRTSQLINF in order to see if there is more or less over and over the same SQL in, just with different host variables or so ...
If the last point should be the case, I would open a message with BC-DB-DB4 so that they can check how to help here or to talk to the application people to behave a bit different ...
Regards
Volker Gueldenpfennig, consolut international ag
http://www.consolut.com http://www.4soi.de http://www.easymarketplace.de -
RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE: Time limit exceeded. Connection Pool - JCO api
Hi Everyone
My Connection Pool parameters JCO api.
client=300
user=SISGERAL_RFC
passwd=******
ashost=14.29.3.120
sysnr=00
size=10
I have these parameters on my Connection Pool and sometimes appear these wrongs in my application:
1.
2006-01-07 13:20:37,414 ERROR com.tel.webapp.framework.SAPDataSource - ##### Time limit exceeded. LOCALIZED MESSAGE = Time limit exceeded. KEY = RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE GROUP = 104 TOSTRING = com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Exception: (104) RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE: Time limit exceeded.
2.
2006-01-07 14:01:31,007 ERROR com.tel.webapp.framework.SapPoolConnectionManager - Timeout
Id like to know if is happening.
Are there something wrong with my connection pool?
What can be happening?
ThanksRaghu,
Thanks for your response.
Yes, the pool connections are in place according to the sAP note mentioned above.
Regards,
Faisal -
Memory Leak, Receiver Got Null Message & Consumer limit exceeded on destina
When running program that adds an Object message to a JMS queue and then recieves it. I get the following.
1) interminitent NULL messages recieved.
2) jms.JMSException: [C4073]: Consumer limit exceeded on destination interactionQueueDest. Even though only one receiver can be receiving via the supplied program.
3) After many message are added to the queue 1000's the Message Queue goes to Out Of Memory exception. It should swap to disk!!
STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM :
RUN this program via a JSP call in the application server.
JSP
<%@ page language="java" import="jms.*"%>
<html>
<head>
<title>Leak Memory</title>
</head>
<body>
<hr/>
<h1>Leak Memory</h1>
<%
LeakMemory leakMemory = new LeakMemory();
leakMemory.runTest(10000,1000);
// NOTE will brake but slower with setting leakMemory.runTest(10000,100);
%>JMS resources must be created:
jms/queueConnectionFactory
jms/interactionQueue
must be created first.
Class:
package jms;
import javax.naming.*;
import javax.jms.*;
public class LeakMemory implements Runnable {
private QueueConnectionFactory queueConnectionFactory = null;
private Queue interactionQueue = null;
private boolean receiverRun = true;
private QueueConnection queueConnection;
private int totalMessageInQueue = 0;
public LeakMemory() {
init();
* initialize queues
public void init(){
try {
InitialContext context = new InitialContext();
this.queueConnectionFactory = (QueueConnectionFactory)context.lookup("jms/queueConnectionFactory");
this.interactionQueue = (Queue) context.lookup("jms/interactionQueue");
catch (NamingException ex) {
printerError(ex);
public void runTest(int messageCount, int messageSize){
this.receiverRun = true;
Thread receiverThread = new Thread(this);
receiverThread.start();
for (int i = 0; i < messageCount; i++) {
StringBuffer messageToSend = new StringBuffer();
for (int ii = 0; ii < messageSize; ii++) {
messageToSend.append("0123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789\n");
QueueConnection queueConnectionAdder = null;
QueueSession queueInteractionSession = null;
QueueSender interactionQueueSender = null;
try {
//Get a queue connection
queueConnectionAdder = this.getQueueConnection();
queueInteractionSession = queueConnectionAdder.createQueueSession(false, Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
interactionQueueSender = queueInteractionSession.createSender(this.interactionQueue);
ObjectMessage objectMessage = queueInteractionSession.createObjectMessage(messageToSend);
objectMessage.setStringProperty("PROPERTY", "" + System.currentTimeMillis());
//Send object
interactionQueueSender.send(objectMessage,DeliveryMode.PERSISTENT,5,0);
totalMessageInQueue++;
//Close Resources
interactionQueueSender.close();
queueInteractionSession.close();
interactionQueueSender = null;
queueInteractionSession = null;
} catch (JMSException ex) {
printerError(ex);
* run
public void run() {
while(this.receiverRun){
try {
QueueSession interactionQueueSession = this.getQueueConnection().createQueueSession(false, Session.CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE);
QueueReceiver queueReceiver = interactionQueueSession.createReceiver(this.interactionQueue);
ObjectMessage message = (ObjectMessage)queueReceiver.receive(100);
if(message != null){
StringBuffer messageRecived = (StringBuffer)message.getObject();
//Simulate Doing Something
synchronized (this) {
try {
Thread.sleep(400);
catch (InterruptedException ex1) {
//Can Safely be ignored
message.acknowledge();
totalMessageInQueue--;
} else {
printerError(new Exception("Receiver Got Null Message"));
queueReceiver.close();
interactionQueueSession.close();
queueReceiver = null;
interactionQueueSession = null;
catch (JMSException ex) {
printerError(ex);
* Get's the queue Connection and starts it
* @return QueueConnection The queueConnection
public synchronized QueueConnection getQueueConnection(){
if (this.queueConnection == null) {
try {
this.queueConnection = this.queueConnectionFactory.createQueueConnection();
this.queueConnection.start();
catch (JMSException ex) {
printerError(ex);
return this.queueConnection;
private void printerError(Exception ex){
System.err.print("ERROR Exception totalMessageInQueue = " + this.totalMessageInQueue + "\n");
ex.printStackTrace();
}Is there something wrong with the way I'm working with JMS or is it just this unreliable in Sun App Server 7 Update 3 on windows?1) interminitent NULL messages recieved.Thanks that explains the behavior. It was wierd getting null messages when I know there is messages in the queue.
2) jms.JMSException: [C4073]: Consumer limit exceeded
on destination interactionQueueDest. Even though only
one receiver can be receiving via the supplied
program. No other instances, Only this program. Try it yourself!! It works everytime on Sun Application Server 7 update 2 & 3
heres the broker dump at that error point
[14/Apr/2004:12:51:47 BST] [B1065]: Accepting: [email protected]:3211->admin:3205. Count=1
[14/Apr/2004:12:51:47 BST] [B1066]: Closing: [email protected]:3211->admin:3205. Count=0
[14/Apr/2004:12:52:20 BST] [B1065]: Accepting: [email protected]:3231->jms:3204. Count=1 [14/Apr/2004:12:53:31 BST] WARNING [B2009]: Creation of consumer from connection [email protected]:3231 on destination interactionQueueDest failed:
B4006: com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.util.BrokerException: [B4006]: Unable to attach to queue queue:single:interactionQueueDest: a primary queue is already active
3) After many message are added to the queue 1000's
the Message Queue goes to Out Of Memory exception. It
should swap to disk!!The broker runs out of memory. Version in use
Sun ONE Message Queue Copyright 2002
Version: 3.0.1 SP2 (Build 4-a) Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Compile: Fri 07/11/2003 All Rights ReservedOut of memory snippet
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:28 BST] [B1089]: In low memory condition, Broker is attempting to free up resources
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:28 BST] [B1088]: Entering Memory State [B0022]: YELLOW from previous state [B0021]: GREEN - current memory is 118657K, 60% of total memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:38 BST] WARNING [B2075]: Broker ran out of memory before the passed in VM maximum (-Xmx) 201326592 b, lowering max to currently allocated memory (200431976 b ) and trying to recover [14/Apr/2004:13:08:38 BST] [B1089]: In low memory condition, Broker is attempting to free up resources
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:38 BST] [B1088]: Entering Memory State [B0024]: RED from previous state [B0022]: YELLOW - current memory is 128796K, 99% of total memory [14/Apr/2004:13:08:38 BST] ERROR [B3008]: Message 2073-192.168.0.50(80:d:b6:c4:d6:73)-3319-1081944517772 exists in the store already [14/Apr/2004:13:08:38 BST] WARNING [B2011]: Storing of JMS message from IMQConn[AUTHENTICATED,[email protected]:3319,jms:3282] failed:
com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.util.BrokerException: Message 2073-192.168.0.50(80:d:b6:c4:d6:73)-3319-1081944517772 exists in the store already
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:38 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:38 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:39 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:39 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:39 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:39 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:40 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:40 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:40 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:40 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:41 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:42 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:42 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:42 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:42 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:43 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:43 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:43 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:43 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:44 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:44 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:44 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:45 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:45 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:46 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:46 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:47 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:47 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:47 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:47 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:48 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:49 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:49 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:49 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:49 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:50 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:50 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:50 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:50 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:51 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:51 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:51 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:51 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:52 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:52 BST] WARNING [B2076]: Broker is rejecting new producers, because it is extremely low on memory
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:53 BST] ERROR [B3107]: Attempt to free memory failed, taking more drastic measures : java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:53 BST] ERROR unable to deal w/ error: 1
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:53 BST] ERROR TRYING TO CLOSE [14/Apr/2004:13:08:53 BST] ERROR DONE CLOSING
[14/Apr/2004:13:08:53 BST] [B1066]: Closing: [email protected]:3319->jms:3282. Count=0 -
Short dump "Time limit exceeded" when searching for Business Transactions
Hello Experts,
We migrated from SAP CRM 5.2 to SAP CRM 7.0. After migration, our business transaction search (quotation, sales order, service order, contract etc) ends with the short dump "Time limit exceeded" in class CL_CRM_REPORT_ACC_DYNAMIC, method DATABASE_ACCESS. The select query is triggered from line 5 of this method.
Number of Records:
CRMD_ORDERADM_H: 5,115,675
CRMD_ORDER_INDEX: 74,615,914
We have done these so far, but the performance is still either poor or times out.
1. DB team checked the ORACLE parameters and confirmed they are fine. They also checked the health of indices in table CRMD_ORDER_INDEX and indices are healthy
2. Created additional indices on CRMD_ORDERADM_H and CRMD_ORDER_INDEX. After the creation of indices, some of the searches(without any criteria) work. But it takes more than a minute to fetch 1 or 2 records
3. An ST05 trace confirmed that the selection on CRMD_ORDER_INDEX takes the most time. It takes about 103 seconds to fetch 2 records (max hits + 1)
4. If we specify search parameters, say for example a date or status, then again we get a short dump with the message "Time limit exceeded".
5. Observed that only if a matching index is available for the WHERE clause, the results are returned (albeit slowly). In the absence of an index, we get the dump.
6. Searched for notes and there are no notes that could help us.
Any idea what is causing this issue and what we can do to resolve this?
Regards,
BalaHi Michael,
Thanks. Yes we considered the note 1527039. None of the three scenarios mentioned in the note helped us. But we ran CRM_INDEX_REBUILD to check if the table CRMD_ORDER_INDEX had a problem. That did not help us either.
The business users told us that they mostly search using the date fields or Object ID. We did not have any problem with search by Object ID. So we created additional indices to support search using the date fields.
Regards,
Bala -
Static credit check: credit limit exceeded for consignment issue delivery
Hi,
We are encountering a credit limit exceeded error in delivery creation for a consignment issue.
In SPRO config "Credit limit check for order types", no credit limit check is assigned to the order type. However, there is one assigned for the delivery type. Also, for CCAr/Risk cat./CG combination in OVA8 (Auto Credit Block Delivery), static credit check has been activated with error message reaction. Open orders and open deliveries were also activated. Customer exceeded credit exposure but user cannot release the order in any VKMx transactions as no credit limit check is assigned to the order type.
Given that this is the current setup, and the following conditions:
1. Credit limit for the customer cannot be increased
2. Oldest open item cannot be cleared just yet
Is there any way that we can proceed with delivery creation for this customer? The other order types have credit limit check so credit management team was able to release them. However, we are unsure on how to proceed with this consignment order. Kindly advise and thank you in advance for your help.We are encountering a credit limit exceeded error in delivery creation for a consignment issue.
but user cannot release the order in any VKMx transactions as no credit limit check is assigned to the order type.
Looks contradictory and it may need to run report RVKRED77 to reorganization of open credit values. Try to run the report in test system and then run in production system. After running the report, the use must be able to release in VKM* transaction.
Regards, -
Error while running query "time limit exceeding"
while running a query getting error "time limit exceeding".plz help.
hi devi,
use the following links
queries taking long time to run
Query taking too long
with hopes
Raja Singh -
TIME LIMIT EXCEEDED ERROR WHILE EXECUTING DTP
Hi gurus,
I Have got an error while executing
The errors are as follows.
1.Time limit exceeded. No return of the split processes
2.Background process BCTL_DK9MC0C2QM5GWRM68I1I99HZL terminated due to missing confirmation
3.Resource error. No batch process available. Process terminated
Note: Iam not executing the DTP as a back ground job.
As it is of higher priority the answers Asap Is appreciated.
Regards
Amar.Hi,
how is it possible to execute a DTP in dialog process. In my mind it is only possible for debugging...
In "Display Data Transfer Process" -> "Goto" -> "Settings for Batch Manger" you can edit settings like Number of Processes or Job Class.
Additional take a look at table RSBATCHPARALLEL and
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/42/f29aa933321a61e10000000a422035/frameset.htm
Regards
Andreas -
Time Limit exceeded while running in RSA3
Hi BW Experts,
I am trying to pull 1 lakh data from CRM to BI System.
Before scheduling, i am trying to execute in RSA3.I am getting the error message as "Time Limit Exceeded".
Pls suggest, why it is happening like this.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Ram.Hi,
because huge data with in the stipulated time it is not executing and showing the all records ,so it is better to go any selection option by each document type or some else then u can add all the documents ,anyway in bw side we r running this job in background so no problem.if u want see all records at a time then u can discuss with ur basis people to extend the time for that.
Thanks & Regards
sathish -
Hello All,
I am trying to execute a custom program with a variant, but I receive the Time limit exceeded error [TIME_OUT].
I am now trying to analyse why this error has occurred as I am a beginner. Any help shall be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Arpita.
Moderator message: Welcome to SCN!
Moderator message: Please Read before Posting in the Performance and Tuning Forum
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Oct 20, 2011 2:01 PMHi Ramya,
Your prog running in the back ground, so the time limit of the prog is exceded. Go to sm37 see the prog running time if exceded correct the time.
Regards
Srinu -
Time Limit exceeded error in R & R queue
Hi,
We are getting Time limit exceeded error in the R & R queue when we try to extract the data for a site.
The error is happening with the message SALESDOCGEN_O_W. It is observed that whenever, the timelimit error is encountered, the possible solution is to run the job in the background. But in this case, is there any possibility to run the particular subscription for sales document in the background.
Any pointers on this would be of great help.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Rasmi.Hi Rasmi
I suppose that the usual answer would be to increase the timeout for the R&R queue.
We have increased the timeout on ours to 60 mins and that takes care of just about everything.
The other thing to check would be the volume of data that is going to each site for SALESDOCGEN_O_W. These are pretty big BDOCs and the sales force will not thank you for huge contranns time
If you have a subscription for sales documents by business patrner, then it is worth seeing if the business partner subscription could be made more intelligent to fit your needs
Regards
James -
Time Limit exceeded error in ALV report
I am gettting error "Time Limit Exceeded" when i execute ALV report. Can i run the program in background and how to do that?. I had already optimized my query in the program but even then i am facing the same issue.
You can process the alv in background by pressing F9...I guess that the output would be available as a spool in SP01.
You may need to re-check your query...And also, review the alv catalog and any events you are using....
Greetings,
Blag.
Maybe you are looking for
-
All my computer says is that it reconises that there's a iPod there but that it can't use it for some reason. All of the solutions offered have not worked. I just want to be able to use my iTunes properly again.
-
Moving Events and iPhoto library to a new Mac
I just picked up a new Mini for my HTPC. I would like to move the Events and photos that I already have on my other Macs to the new one. I exported all of the photos to a flash drive and then imported them in on the new Mini, but of course it just im
-
Windows 7 Ultimate x64 with all patches Office 2007 Ultimate with all patches One of my systems has begun to crash a lot lately. The information below is from bluescreenview. The associated mini-dumps are at: http://1drv.ms/1kgMrIW The latest two c
-
Can MDM web service search results be filtered by tuple values?
We are currently working with MDM 7.1 SP03 and Netweaver 7.0. Right now, there is a requirement to return a material record from MDM to a Web Dynpro form using the MDM search web service. The other requirement is that the form user can search for a m
-
I have a 6555 phone that I had been synching with outlook (Outlook 2000 running on Windows 2000). I have PC Suite v6.85... installed. When the phone is reset, it will sync fine the first time, but each time after the phone resets itself (powers dow