Urgent!!!! Clear_form should not clear master

hi everybody,
am using master detail blocks.when i call clear_form it should not clear master(am not going to use clear_block)?what should be done? or is there any workaround for this?
thanks in advance
bala

The only way you can clear part of a form without clearing others is to use Clear_block. Clear_Form clears all blocks.
If you want to keep a few fields, you can copy them to variables in pl/sql, clear the form, then copy them back onto the form fields.

Similar Messages

Payment run - should not clear the open item but should post payment doc

Hi Gurus,
Can you please help me , on how to acheive like when payment run F110 post the payment doc it should not close the open item rather keep that open item as open item , but hsould be be paid by payment doc posted through payment run F110.
Have any one of you had similar requirement ..? FICO gurus help me to acheiev this .. any exit /BADI ..or ideas..
Appreciate your help in advance

HI ,
Thanks for your reply , but still I am not clear on that.
reason they want to keep this open to be kept as open item , so that item will be picked up by dunning run ..
Basically the open invoice is being cleared by payment doc which was generated by payment run. If we look at BSEG in the open item record BSEG-AUGBL = will have the clearing doc number , and in addition to that BSEG will have created another record for the clearing doc as well .
May be since open invoice record is being updated with clearing doc (AUGBL ) , I belive its not shown up as open item .
Somehow this item should be kept as open item ... that is the req and also paid item payment reference should be transfered to Bill of exchange as well.
Hope you have clear background of my req...
Tnanks in advance ,

Inserts using Automatic Row Processing (DML) should not clear cache

Hi,
I am using APEX 4.0.1.00.03.
I created a form on a table for inserts and updates.
After I do an insert, the Automatic Row Processing (DML) clears cache for all items on the page.
But the user wants to see the data he inserted without having to query. How can I achieve this?
Thanks
Chandra

There isn't any "reset page" process on my page.
--Chandra.

Pricing errors are not cleared after fixing the master data

Hi All,
Kindly go through the issue explained below.
Pricing is determined properly in transaction level(Oppt) when the master data is correct. cool.
System shows pricing error (Mandatory condition 0PR0 is missing, Pricing could not be determined) when price(condition record) is not maintained in product. This is also fine. Now the issue is, Pricing errors are not going away from Opportunity even after the master data(product) fixed with maintaining pricing.
Scenario : Opportunity is saved with pricing errors.
Analysis : Price or/and Sales area are not maintained in Product that is maintained in Oppt. That is why this error occurs. So, we have maintained the Sales area/Price(condition record) in product. Now master data is corrected.
Expected result: After maintaining the price/sales area in product, the errors should go off from the created Opportunities and pricing should be determined properly.
Actual result: When we create a new opportunity with the same product, pricing is determined. But the errors are not going away from the already created opportunity transactions.
Please let me know if this scenario is not clear to understand.
Please help with your inputs. Thank you for your time.
Regards,
Maddy

Hi Luis,
Thank you very much for your reply. Could you please help me where is the button 'Redermine Pricing' available? I have checked in Opportunity transaction but failed.
Regards,
Maddy

While creating vendor master , it should not accept duplicate VAT number

while creating vendor master , it should not accept duplicate VAT number
implement this with function exit.

there is no link in vendor master creation that could check that company code and purchasing org are belonging together.
the vendor master is in general just 3 more or less independend levels: general data, company code data, purchasing org data.
Why should it not be possible to maintain a company code data view for any company code available in customizing?
Why should it not be possible to maintainpurchasing org data view for any purchasing org available in customizing?
Assume you have a system with 3 companies and 3 purchasing orgs maintained for one vendor, then you have 9 potential combinations. then 3 combinations would make sense, while 6 possible other combination would not give any sense.
1 - 1 makes sense
2 - 2 makes sense
3 - 3 makes sense
1 - 2 no sense
1 - 3 no sense
2 - 1 no sense
2 - 3 no sense
3 - 1 no sense
3 - 2 no sense
As there is no restriction (except auhtority) the user can create any meaningful and nonsense combination in vendor master creation in one go.
But fact is that you have to have 3 companies and 3 purchasing orgs maintained for one vendor. While creating purchase orders SAP checks if the combination entered in the PO does make sense.
the users who are able to create vendors should have skills to do so.

End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it

Hello
I put CONTRACT START DATE and CONTRACT END DATE fields on the form. These 2 objects (Date/Time objjects) i pulled them from Satndard tab of pallette and dropped on my layout page design, fine.
Now, am trying to put a validation that the end dat eshould not lower than start date, so, i got a thread as below from Niall,
http://forums.adobe.com/message/1909551
and i did my FormCalc coding under EXIT event of END DATE field as below,
// Pls. note this FormCalc
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - Begin
var stDate
var endDate
stDate = xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_START_DATE") .rawValue
endDate = xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_END_DATE").r awValue
if (stDate > endDate) then
    xfa.host.messageBox("End date is lower than Start date! End date is cleared")
    xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_END_DATE").r awValue = null
endif
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - End
I tried in VALIDATE, CALCULATE, CHANGE events of END DATE, but nothing working!!
PLs. let me kow how can i achieve my requirement? I am anewbie,
Thank you

If you use the exit event, you will probably have to have the same code on both the start and end date fields since they have a dependancy on each other. Maybe better to try the validate event of the end date so that if either field is changed the event gets fired. You can try the following for validate event
// Pls. note this FormCalc
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - Begin
var stDate
var endDate
stDate = CON_START_DATE.rawValue
endDate = $.rawValue
if ( HasValue(endDate) ) then
    if (stDate > endDate) then
        xfa.host.messageBox("End date is lower than Start date! End date is cleared")
        $.rawValue = null
    endif
endif
1
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - End

Contract End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it

Hello
I put CONTRACT START DATE and CONTRACT END DATE fields on the form. These 2 objects (Date/Time objjects) i pulled them from Satndard tab of pallette and dropped on my layout page design, fine.
Now, am trying to put a validation that the end dat eshould not lower than start date, so, i got a thread as below from Niall,
http://forums.adobe.com/message/1909551
and i did my FormCalc coding under EXIT event of END DATE field as below,
// Pls. note this FormCalc
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - Begin
var stDate
var endDate
stDate = xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_START_DATE") .rawValue
endDate = xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_END_DATE").r awValue
if (stDate > endDate) then
xfa.host.messageBox("End date is lower than Start date! End date is cleared")
xfa.resolveNode("CUSTOMER.Page31_Contracts.Con_Whole_Page.CON_Basic_Info.CON_END_DATE").r awValue = null
endif
// End date should not less than Start date, else CLEAR it - End
I tried in VALIDATE, CALCULATE, CHANGE events of END DATE, but nothing working!!
PLs. let me kow how can i achieve my requirement? I am anewbie,
Thank you

http://forums.adobe.com/message/4264933#4264933

Free Goods Should not down MAP -

Hi, MM / FI Gurus!
We have a scenario where Vendor offers a Discount in Kind. For e.g. For Order Qty over 1000 Pcs vendor offers 10 Pcs free over each 100 Pcs. Assuming PO price as 10 units then for 1200 Ordered Qty vendor delivers 1200 + 120 = 1320
In PO the Free Goods are determined correctly (in either cases whether Inclusive / Exclusive). Order quantity in first line has a gross price determined. The second line tiem in PO has Free Goods Quantity determined as per procedure for Discount in Kind, with zero price.
When we do GR the Inventory is up by Order Quantity + Free Goods Quantity.
Automatic posting in MM determines the GL correctly.
Dr Inventory - Drugs and Meds: 128010 Amt 12000 Curr
Cr GR/IR Clearing:                               200060 Amt 12000- Curr
As expected MAP goes down due to Free Goods (Zero Price)
Client wants to up the inventory for by Order Qty + Free-Goods Qty but this should not down the MAP as well.
I have activated Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts for Incoming Invoice
Idea was to Credit Gross Price on the Free goods Quantity to Inventory - Drugs and Meds: 128010 to make up the MAP in material master and Debit the same amount to Other Income as follow:
Dr GR/IR Clearing: 200060 Amt 12000 Curr
Cr Vendor Account:                          200001 Amt 12000- Curr
Dr Inventory - Drugs and Meds: 128010 Amt 1200 Curr (Free Goods)
Cr COS-Drugs & Med:                         500100 Amt 1200- Curr (Free Goods)
However we cannot post Gross-price for Free goods Directly on the same GL(which has Automatic posting Checked) to Up the MAP (which falls down because of free goods having zero price).
Is there any way in FI to have both Automatic and Manual posting for the same GL?
Also I am not sure that after we do this if MAP will be Up.
Is there any other way may be by using Movement Type for such Movements?
Thanks
Atul Sonalkar

Hi Atul
Create PO only for the material for which you are going to pay your vendor.
ie., for 1000 units @ Rs. 12 = 12000. Post GR.
Now you are getting 100 units free. Don't enter this in your existing PO. Create a new PO for the free goods and post GR.
Your MAP related problem will be solved.
Regards
Rajesh
Do reward if this is useful.

Can you check my final setup? Two things not clear yet

Hey guys,
Just when I thought I got it all figured out, something new (at least to me) pops up and raises more questions than answers. So I go on and search more and more and more and now finally I think i've got my setup allmost ready to order. Could you check it and help me out on the final insecurities? Thanx a bunch.
Oh and please, if you have a suggestions to change something I feel is allready o.k (so no questions)...make it a suggestion with enough info to let me make a choice in the matter. Give me a link to a Benchmarksite or e really good test. If the difference is minimal (seconds) on about 10 min. of final footage, than please don't send me on a chase again. My girlfriend would like me to bed with her at the same time now after a week or so
and    I want to order the damn.. stuff and start.
Camera:               Canon XF 100, uses Canon MPEG-2 4:2:2 50Mbps codec
Software:             Adobe Premiere Pro CS5.53
Motherboard:       ASUS P8Z68-V Pro
Question: not to much benchmarks around on the Z68 combined with I 2700. Anyone who uses this board with the 2700 or 2700K step forward please and elaborate.
Cpu:                     intel      core I7 2600
Memory:               16 Gb    Kingston ValueRAM (2x 8 GB : 2 x 4 GB - DIMM 240-pins - DDR3 - 1333 MHz
or
Cpu:                     intel      core I7 2600K
Memory:               16 Gb    Corsair Vengeance Blue 16GB DDR3-1600 CL9 quad kit
Question:               I think I’d go for the first option. It’s cheaper and from what I’ve read there not a lot to gain. My videos mostly don’t exceed 10                               minutes of final footage. Anyone can acknowledge this (or not)?
Videocard:           MSI        N570GTX-M2D12D5/OC
Harddisk:             OCZ       Vertex 3 120GB   (sata 600) for my OS
Harddisk:             S’sung WD Caviar Green WD20EARS x3 (sata 300)
To raid or not to raid is still not clear for me. 5 is definitely a no go
I’m thinking I’d put 2 disks in a Raid 0 for more speed and on a regular base BAckup to the other one( and eventually go for external back-up)
Is that ‘o.k. or mmh’, then fine. Is it a ‘oh no, what is he thinking’, please tell me.
Cooler:                Scythe Mugen                 2 Rev. B
Housing:              Cooler Master Xilencio
Powersupply:       Seasonic 620
Monitor:               Eizo       EV2333WH-BK
Optische drive:     LG          BH10LS30
Cardreader:          lexar     LEXAR PROFESSIONAL USB 3.0 DUAL-SLOT READER (for CF’s canoncamera)
Speakers              Creative              GigaWorks T20 Series II
Special :               Contour Design ShuttlePro2
Thanx guys and girls(?) for hopefully making my life easier. Greeting from Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Holland

Scott,
Referring to your post #8.
JCschild wrote:
i have proven this to be false....
This is a big concern to some of us end users who want to put our money where it counts.
Is there a clear benchmark varifying your actual test results, which us newbies can view?
Referring to your post #10 above.
they are also end users not system builders and do not have the resources/access we have to multiple platforms, processors ram etc.
How can we really know for sure if we go on word of mouth only, one swears by Ford, one swears by Chevy.
What should us newbies believe,
the feedback from end users who have the real world experience of the behaviour of their systems working regularly with large or complex projects, with strict timelines under time pressure, who cannot afford jerkiness nor delay of any kind, who must afford to save a lot of aggravation caused by less responsive systems, who cannot afford to be held back by hard disk failure or loss of data that took valuable time editing, who need lesser time requirements for regular backups, etc, who know what video editing involves in real practice,
or the feedback from system builders who have “the resources/access to multiple platforms, processors ram etc.” to run hardware tests, but who do not have the experience of high end video editing in practice?
Perhaps it is true that a video card running at PCIe-8x is not much slower than a video card running at PCIe-16x.
I don't know for sure.
What will happen if things change, sooner than we thought, with new drivers and CS6 PP utilizing the full bandwidth, and end users are stuck with systems that don't have the required PCI-e lanes to accomodate more than a 16 x PCI-e nVidia card?
It appears to me that the i7-2600K is indeed a great processor, delivering great value for money, for the majority of general-purpose applications, but
how does it perform when one works with large or complex projects, and multitask, such as having DW do a complete validation on multiple DHTML files, including SSE, running a resize action in PS on a couple of thousand images, encoding large files in FL and PR doing an export to a complex long form BRD?
I was very tempted, and came very close, to buying an i7-2600K for myself, but after learning just how much high-end video editing can demand from a system, I became hesitant to buy the i7-2600K with its platform. I need to be sure that the system I buy has no limitations for the work I need to do with it.
If Intel had video editing in mind when designing the i7-2600K, it would not have had integrated graphics, which is of no use when we need a nVidia card.
Regardless of the fact that according to http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/core-i7-2600k-990x.html the i7-2600K outperformed many pricier products for a higher-end LGA1366 platform (even the $1000 i7-990X Extreme Edition yielding significantly to Core i7-2600K within the majority of general-purpose applications, except during video processing and transcoding, final rendering and a few specific tasks, such as encryption and batch image processing), Intel still positioned this processor as a mid-level processor, for a reason.
Intel knew before release what this mid-level i7-2600K was capable of, therefore releasing it positioned as a mid-level processor, they did so having the architecture to follow up with a mid-level processor that will outperform the i7-2600K, within the same price category, else who would buy Intel's next mid-level processors?
I suspect that for those who are willing to hold out and wait just a bit longer, so they can put their money where it counts, Intel has a pleasant surprise coming soon, and that the new platform will not be evolutionary like it has been for years, but revolutionary with feature improvements from Sandy Bridge like Intel's tri-gate transistor technology, PCI Express 3.0 support and Graphics DirectX 11 and OpenCL support, a bigger graphics performance and bigger CPU performance boost compared to Sandy Bridge.
what makes you think you need a raid controller.... the vast majority of Adobe users do not need one or an 8 drive raid array..
Yes, for those who never need a hardware raid controller, using it for general-purpose applications, the 2600K and its P67 or Z68 platform is nice.
The OP did not specify whether or not he will need a hardware controller, wherefore I cared to post my post #7 above,
nor did he specify his source material, editing style, the nature of his timelines and the time pressure he is under with his projects (other than a mention in his original post of his girlfriend's time request), or how long he intends to use the system before upgrading to the next one.
and why i finally posted the big cup of zip it thread.. to clear out some mis-leading comments.
Scott
ADK
Quoting from your original post in A big cup of "zip it" or the definative final P67 vs X58 answer thread :
Now in all fairless of disclosure the drive benchmarks dropped from our previous tests on X58 which is odd, we are guessing the video card as its ramping up would take bandwidth from the controller even though its supposed to be running 8x.
Scott
ADK
Since you wrote that “the direct replacement for X58 is X79” (System build for CS5.5. Contemplating whether or not to wait for Q1/Q2 2012.), I am eager to learn which exact motherboard(s) was/were used when you ran those previous tests on X58?
Supposing the video card took bandwidth from the controller, even though its supposed to be running 8x, why do you think it would do that as it's ramping up?
Is there a clear benchmark varifying your actual test results, which us newbies can view?

My iphone plus is bending, what does Apple offer regarding this issue? I am trying to get to contact with Apple Customer Care, but not clear to me how to do it beside this channel of communication. I bought the phone from kosovar carrier which is u

My iphone plus is bending, what does Apple offer regarding this issue?
I am trying to get to contact with Apple Customer Care, but not clear to me how to do it beside this channel of communication. I bought the phone from kosovar carrier which is under Slovenian ownership. This means that the original warranty comes from Slovenia, bit complicated but still I would like to get an urgent answer how to proceed with this issue, thanks

Maybe i should have only asked if anyone is aware on apple's policy
regarding bending. I took the point that this seems not a proper forum to
pose Q's to apple thanks to both
On Wednesday, November 5, 2014, Apple Support Communities Updates <

Can not refresh page after save properly(When not saving master record)

I am using jdeveloper 11g R2 (11.1.2.3) JSF Facelet
In some use case I have Address as master table and Person as detail table
For some business reason I need to don't save same addresses
eg:
If +1 Test St+ is in database already and new user coming and adding this address with new person
I need to use the row in database not creating a new address
I do saving in doDML method of Address with some hashing algorithm and it is fine
My problem is that I can not refresh page after save properly
User coming to page think Adding a new address and a new person but in fact no new
address added because of business I describe above
Any ideas how I can implement this?
Appreciate that
Regards
Mohsen

Hi,
from your description it is not clear why the page doesn't refresh. It could be a problem in your implementation code - who knows. What if you perform the address check on a command button that actually submits the new address? If the check returns true (address exists) you would call row.refresh(forget new row); and re-query the view object so the address coming from the database is displayed. If you wanted to use the doDML then yuou need to be aware that doDML doesn't help removing the row the user created. It just ignores the database update but the entity is still around, which in my suggested solution wont be the case.
Frank

FDM export to HFM - 2nd export did not clear all data from 1st export?

Has anyone experienced exporting a replacement FDM file to HFM where the 2nd file did not contain an account that was present in the original file and that account/value in the 1st file then remained in the HFM trial balance and caused it to be out of balance? Does the replace export option not clear all the prior file data? The only unusual part of it might be that the problem account was derived using logic group script? Thanks.

Thanks Hensen - Sure, it was easy enough to fix once I deduced what the problem was - although my solution was just to use the data clear function and reload. The real question is how to prevent it from happening again and it sounds like I can't do much about it - other than trying to train the users to watch out for do-over files that have fewer accounts than the original load?? Am I wrong to think that HFM should try to fully clear all previous data from a load file if there is a replacement or at least try to validate whether or not all prior accounts have been repopulated?? There's plenty of good validation in the validation step of FDM. Why not during the export step? If this makes sense, I'll put in another "enhancement request" to support.

Work order should not update the fields in PR

Hi Gurus
My requirements is that workorder should not updates the purchasing data fields in PR do not go to the shoping cart. How can make it possible.
Thanks in Advance

Hi,
I am not sure of your requirement clearly but check up the below user exits :-
COZF0001 Change purchase req. for externally processed operation
COZF0002 Change purchase req. for externally procured component
or BADI :- IWO1_PREQ_BADI BAdI for Manipulation of P.Reqs from Orders + Networks ,SE18
regrds
pushpa

Payment not clearing for Vendor through Automatic Payment Program

Hi
I had setup automatic payment program for my vendor to take $ from my GL account. When I run the payment program, it ran without any error, however, the vendor account was not cleared. The balance in GL and Vendor account remains the original amounts.
The log shows the following.
Job started
Step 001 started ( program SAPF110S, variant &0000000001081, user ID XXXXXXX)
Log for payment run for payment on 01/12/2008, identification XXXX
End of log
Job finished
Can anyone help ?
Thanks
Shalini

I have not proposed a solution. Now go to F110 and go to the table additional tab and press proposal log button on the lower right hand side. this will give a detailed log. Either analyse this error set right error or send the error log for analysis.
First run the proposal run and if it is successful, run the payment run and then to print run.
It should be run in the above sequence.
Edited by: Sivakumar Gopalakrishnan on Jan 12, 2008 7:54 PM

APP Open Item Not cleared

Hi All,
I have strange issue. automatic payment run is executed and after that i have messgae
Posting orders: 23 generated, 22 completed
i have 23 clearing document but one document which is generated its not cleared the open item and even am not finding that
document no in FB03 t code.
can you give give me your overview on this issue
"Posting orders: 23 generated, 22 completed" : Why this type of messgage genarated and what will be the reason
Thank you

With reference to the issue reported, as you have noticed the number of generated documents and the number of completed documents are different
-> "Posting orders: 23 generated, 22 completed". This is a clear indicator that there was something wrong with the update process and the payment document did not get posted. The reason why you have more documents generated than completed maybe due to update terminations on the executing the payment run. It means one of document was not posted
in the database. You could find the terminated update using SM13. Here you can find an update termination found via sm13 when user processed the payment.
Also please review the attached note 86578, especially the third recommendation and payment run processing option number 1. Comparison of 'Completed' orders to 'Generated' orders as stated will result in
identification of incomplete posting problems. Also check this note 70085 which has very good information:
If you have such terminations in future and documents were not posted, then please try the following
F110 menupath: Edit > Payments > After termination >
Draw up again.
Else the correction to be taken is to recreate manually the missing document and update the relevant cleared line items with the
payment document as the clearing document:
1.Use report RFVBER00 to find document gaps:
2.Pay the invoices manually.
You should be able to avoid double payment by using the below option in the print program i.e.
You should always select the flag "Payment doc.validation" on running your RFFO* report.
It gives an option to check if the payment documents are already in the system or not, and if it's not the print program excludes this data for payment.
Hope this information helps.
Best Regards
Soumya

Urgent!!!! Clear_form should not clear master

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for