URGENT F.07 shows different balance (test run) as compared to FD10

Hi SAP Gurus,
We have the following issue
FD10N is showing P12 ending balance of KRW 83,898,721.
However, from while doing test run for F.07 (balance carried forward), the balance is showing as KRW 82,886,514.
There is a difference of KRW 1,012,207.
Could you please let us know what could be the reason for this difference?
Full points shall be rewarded for your valuable inputs.
Thanks and Regards,
Sreeni.

Hi,
Postings in the previous year do increase this balance carried forward, but do not carry forward the total of the items already posted in the old year to the new year; the balance carried forward only has the items posted by the new year into the previous year, but not the items posted in the previous year itself.
For more info, check the link -
Re: F.07 year end closing question
Thanks,
Sridevi
Pls. assign points, if useful

Similar Messages

Customer balance display shows different balance than Profit center balance

Dear All
Customer balance display shows different balance than
Customer balance with profit center.
Adivse us for the same.
Viral

Hi
Please run 1KEK and then check the balances.
payables and receivables cannot be transferred to Profit Center Accounting online. You must always transfer them periodically.
The purpose of this activity(1KEK) is to:
1. create the opening balances for payables and receivables
2. transfer the balance changes for payables and receivables periodically
Thanks
Prasad

Update an existing bug doesn't show the new test run "steps to reproduce" in TFS

Hello all...
So let's say I have a bug. Then I run a new test because I've been told it's fixed. This second test fails. I choose "Update an Existing Bug" and I'm presented with the window that looks like I'm reporting a new bug - all the info is there. I save
and close, go into TFS, refresh...and I all I see is the original bug that I reported, but none of the new stuff I just did. Where is that new stuff? I would expect it to push the old stuff down, and the new stuff I'd see above. My developers get mad at me
because I've moved their tasks back to "To Do" but they see the old bug and complain that it's fixed, even though I have new info to report, they don't see it. I'm in VS/MTM 2012 V4...
Thank you for your help!

Hi OneOfThreeDevs,
As you said that you did not see the new bug report in TFS after you
reporting a new bug - all the info by choosing "Update an Existing Bug" option in test runner.
I suggest you need to check if you can see the new bug report by selecting
Testing Center->Test->Verify
Bugs.
(1)If you could not see the
new bug report in the bugs list, I doubt that you may be not update an Existing Bug successfully.
Therefore, I suggest you can refer the following link to create a new bug report by the update an Existing Bug.
Reference:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/dd465175(v=vs.110).aspx
(2)If you could see the new bug report in the bugs list, I suggest you can try to input the bug ID in Team Explorer Windows and then
check this issue again.
In addition, you can try to see the new bug report by the web access.
Reference:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee523998(v=vs.110).aspx
Best Regards,
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

AFAR test run showing the values but not posting in Real run.

Hi Friends,
i have an issue with AFAR recalculating the depreclation. The details are as below;
1. Asset value date is 15.07.2010. but ordinary dep. start date was set as 01.01.2010 manually by the user.
2. The Period control method 11, the dep. is calculated for entire year for acquisition.
3. we have already calculated depreciation from period 12 2010 to period 04, 2011.
4. Now, we have changed ordinary depreciation start date for 5 asset records from 01.01.2010 to 15.07.2010.
5. Therefore, we recalculated AFAR for these assets for 2010 and test run is showing the values for these 5 asset. The same was expected by the business.
6. When we execute the real run, it is not posting and no change in asset explorer for period 12, 2010 or in current period. No error message is available in spool / job log.
We have opened FI periods as well.
My question is that why the system calculating the values in test run and if it is calculated in test run, why it is not posting in update run?
As per the period control method, the depreciation should not recalculated for half year even we change the ordinary dep,start date from 1st Jan to 15th July.
I request you to clarify my doubt and help me to understand the error which is stoping the values in update run of AFAR.
Best Regards,
Padmaja

Hi,
Sorry...it is not worked out. Alternatively, i tried the shift factor with variable depreciation and i achieved the values which appeared in AFAR test run.
Thanks for the help.
Regards,
Padmaja
Edited by: PadmajaCH on May 19, 2011 3:26 PM

Different balances showing in FSV & GL Balance.

Dear Gurus,
When i am comparing the GL a/c balances with Balance Sheet report, it showing difference.
Sundry Debtors:   109,858,885.45-- as per FSV
                  109,989,057.92-- as per Fbl3n
Y it showing like this.
Thanx in advance.
Regards,
Venkat

Dear Friend,
When i am checking balance again same problem but showing different from yesterday amount as per fbl3n.
Yesterday                           TOday
109,989,057.92                      106,100,034.21
Wht could be the reason. Checking same account balance from different way, it should show same. Plz can u elobarate with explanation in reply.
Thanx inadvance.

Error in afab test run in background - very urgent

Friends
I have a problem with one of my clients.
Depreciation ( AFAB) has been run in test mode in foreground. - Run without errors( Successfully)
The same has run in back ground ( TEST MODE), we are getting errors? ( There are no changes of master data)
Regards
HARIKISHAN

can u please clarifly this error is before removing test run and executing the deprecaition run in background or
after removing test run and execting the run in background.
If it is after than take the asset which is showing error and for that assets in afabn run the repeat run. and check whether it is giving any errors.. if yes than go to error log and check it.. if not that
again run the run in background.
i hope it will solve ur problem
sejal

Need to add TEST RUN in the Z Program (URGENT)

Dear All,
I have to add a TEST RUN check Box in the Selection screen,same as Tcode:MRRL.
Current Functionality: When we run this Z program,this will update the Local file data into DATABASE,will create a list stating the number of records updated and so.
Required Functionality is: Before updating the data into DATABASE,want a preview of list with the details of number of records will update and so.
Once user confirms the message,will back to the Selection-Screen and Uncheck the Check box and execute.Now data will update in the DATABASE.
I hope You understand what i mean to say.
Thanks & Regards,
Seshadri G

Hello Seshadri
If the DB table is updated from an itab having the same structure then you could simply display the data in an ALV list, e.g.:
IF ( p_test = 'X' ).
    CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY_LVC'
      EXPORTING
        I_STRUCTURE_NAME = <name of DB tabe>
     TABLES
        t_outtab = <your itab with updated data>.
ELSE.
* ... update DB table
ENDIF.
Regards
Uwe

MB5B shows different opening quantity when we select diffferent Stock Type

Dear All,
I am trying to run report MB5B - Stock on posting date with 2 different Stock Types:
- Storage Loc/Batch Stock
- Valuated Stock
But the report shows different opening quantity,total receipt, total issue, but closing quantity is ok.
Could you pls tell me the reason?
Thanks
Cao Huy

Hi,
MB5B transaction is used to display the stock on posting date
It is not possible to view at the same time both Valuated stock and special stock. This is radio button input control,so any one of the stock type only possible to display the material document.
This report display the material and plant vise material document number and total stock and total issue etc for the example,
Plant            1256 test plant
Material         TH1
Description    steel rod
Stock on 01/01/2010                   0.000 PC
Total Receipts                      29.500 PC
Total Issues                         3.000- PC
Stock on 12/31/9999                   26.500 PC
SLoc MvT S Mat. Doc. Item Pstng Date          Quantity BUn
TEST 101   5000003029    1 12/23/2009            1.000 PC
TEST 101   5000003039    1 12/31/2009            1.000 PC
Regards,
thiru

Stock Posting List and Quantity in Warehouse show different quantities

Hi all,
I have an implementation running on 2007 Edition.
The case is that there is one item that shows different quantity on Stock Tab of Item Master Data and on Stock Posting List for a specific warehous*e. Specifically, on Stock Data of Item Master Data it shows 100 units and on Stock Posting List shows 254 as current Balance. So there is a difference of 154 units
I checked "Expanded" Menu of Stock Posting List in case any special selection was made but no transaction was excluded.
The only extra hint I have is that the difference of 154 is equal to a Stock Reconciliation Transaction that was made (without being sure that this is the cause).
From my point of view, Stock Posting List has the correct quantity and Onhand on Item Master Data shows 154 units less than the correct one
Has anyone faced this one before?
Thanks in advance
Gerasimos

Hi,
Please check Note No. : 1503919. A detect query is mentioned in the Note.
Kindly check the results obtained and if the Item detected is shown in the result obtained, you need to report the issue to SAP Support.
Kind Regards,
Jitin
SAP Business One Forum Team

Newbie blues: Oracle Sql Developer showing different data from Sqlplus.

Newbie blues: Oracle Sql Developer showing different data from Sqlplus.
First of all; it would be difficult to know less about Oracle than myself.
I just installed a recent copy of the server and am running SQl Developer 3.2.20.10.
I made a small test table , borrowed some pl sql code to add rows, then wrote code to delete some rows. Lots of fun.
In SQL Developer “Select * from t1;” now shows 7 records, which seems right.
I wanted other views of the data and so logged in from the command line using SQLPlus.
The same code here shows the table prior to the delete, with 600 plus rows. Needless to say I’ve logged out and back in again, with no changes.
No fun ! What am I not understanding here ?

5e33d18c-3b32-48d4-82a7-676feeaa97c9 wrote:
Newbie blues: Oracle Sql Developer showing different data from Sqlplus.
First of all; it would be difficult to know less about Oracle than myself.
I just installed a recent copy of the server and am running SQl Developer 3.2.20.10.
I made a small test table , borrowed some pl sql code to add rows, then wrote code to delete some rows. Lots of fun.
In SQL Developer “Select * from t1;” now shows 7 records, which seems right.
I wanted other views of the data and so logged in from the command line using SQLPlus.
The same code here shows the table prior to the delete, with 600 plus rows. Needless to say I’ve logged out and back in again, with no changes.
No fun ! What am I not understanding here ?
Others sessions never see uncommitted data
> then wrote code to delete some rows. Lots of fun.
did you ever actually issue COMMIT so other session can see the changed data?

F.16 showing different values.

Hi All,
As year end activity, when running F.16 in test run, we are getting different values as compared to FS10N. Carry Forward balances are not matching for year 2011. Any idea what can be the possible reason for that?
Parul

F.16 balances should tally with FS10N
First execute the F.16, there is no harm to execute this transaction.
Also make sure which GL account you are checking in FS10N
Rgds
Murali. N

Price Diff A/c showing huge balance

While reviewing the income statement account, I found that there is a big debit figure appearing in the Price Difference A/c. I suspect because of that, Net result showing a debit balance in the P&L Statement.
While analysing the accounting document for the above figure, I found the following:
It was posted using transaction AUAK (order Settlement). The entries are:
Fact Output Prod Order Cr. 7762525
price Diff. A/c                 Dr. 7762525
Inventory Change-WIP    Dr. 7762525
Work in Progress            Cr. 7762525
I hope the first two items relating to the Variance settlement and the last two entries relate to the WIP reversal. Is that correct ?
If that is so, why a big figure is appearing for the price difference which is exactly the Change in WIP figures ?

Hello,
All P&L balances are clubbed together in Retained Earnings Account
Make sure when you run F.16, you ticked
"Balance in retain.earng.acct"
Remove test run.
Execute
You get log
Click on Retained earnings account button.
See the balance on last page.
Now go to report S_ALR_87012277
See that the total or retained earnings account has been transferred.
Hope it is clear now.
Regards,
Ravi

"Invoice History Report "show wrong balance for supplier invoice with USD

Invoice History Report show wrong balance for supplier invoice with USD Currency
After I run this report i see in the last of this report there is difference between the supplier total
USD (Currency ) and the open Balance USD , it is decreased the open balance
for supplier with 2300 USD with out any reasons
bellow is some data copy of the report
======================================================
Supplier Site Total: SAR 34,700.00
Supplier Site Total: USD 39,000.00
Supplier Total: SAR 34,700.00
Supplier Total: USD 39,000.00
Open Balance: SAR 34,700.00
Open Balance: USD 36,700.00
*** End of Report ***
==============================================
please advise me from where can this differenc ( 39000 - 36,700=2300 )COMMING
or it is bug in this report , becuase i compare this report with other report in account payable like
-supplier open balance letter
-invoice register report
-invoice aging report
all this report give me the amount for supplier USD =39000
BUT AGIN FROM WHERE THE SYSTEM DECREASED THE AMOUNT TO 36,700
thanks

Can you try running Create Accounting For payments just before you run the Invoice History Report and re-check .
Thanks

Displaying different sheets at run time based on value of the parameter

Hi,
I've a query regarding displaying two different sheets at run time in Oracle discoverer based on the value of the parameter that i give.
I've a parameter Summary_flag.
If the value of the parameter is 'Y',then it should display a sheet,say for example it should display Sheet1.
If the value is 'N',then it should display another sheet, say for example it should display Sheet2.
Is there any way in which i can accomplish this?
I went through the Format and Tools menus but couldnt find anything regarding this aspect.
Can you help me out?
Thanks,

Having a Disco parameter dictate which worksheet is displayed is not an option that is available. There are a few workarounds, though:
1. Have a portlet (or some other web interface) accept your parameters, and then call the appropriate worksheet.
2. Have 2 worksheets, and have it devolve into a training issue (for a summary run this, for all the details run this).
3. Create calculations that will show or hide column data depending on the parameter selected - the columns will still be there, and you can fill them in with blanks, or a message like "N/A for Summary".
4. Create a report that will allow the users to drill between the summary and detail data - I'm not sure whether you could use a parameter to then say whether the report should open up summarized or expanded.

CJR2 entries in version 0 (original) and EFC (copy) show different ? amount

HI Team,
Recently we copied data from Version O to Version EFC using T code CJ9F , When running CJ9F to copy V0 to EFC, the work centre rate has updated in Version EFC with the latest from Version 0 , Therefore, the CJR2 entries in version 0 (original) and EFC (copy) show different ? amounts: is this correct?
My Analysis on the above incident between two Versions
Version EFC
1.     Version EFC consist checkedu201D Integrated planningu201D check box
2.     Exchange Rate type u201CMu201D ,
3.     It doesnu2019t consist any u201Cvalue date u201C
4.     checked   u201C integrated planning with cost center / bus. Process.
Version u201C 0u201D
Version u201C Ou201D doesnu2019t checked u201C integrate planning check box from 2003 fiscal year
2 . Exchange rate type u201C Pu201D u201C
3 .value date u201C 01.04.2003
4 . unchecked u201Cintegrated planning with cost center / bus. Process
where is the data corrected can any one guide me and let me know if any steps are missing
thanks
Ranamka

Hi kim standley,
Thanks for using Apple Support Communities. I would first try resetting SyncServices as described here:
Mac OS X: Resetting the SyncServices folder
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1627
If the issue persists after that, I'd move on to this article:
Sync Services: Advanced troubleshooting for contact and calendar syncing
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts2481
Cheers,
- Ari

*URGENT* F.07 shows different balance (test run) as compared to FD10

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for

URGENT F.07 shows different balance (test run) as compared to FD10