Use Of Rational Robot for Testing

We are trying to use Rational Robot to record our Forms 10g application for playback.
It appears that traffic between Jinitiator and the application server is using HTTPS, is this true?
When we record the script the data etc is unreadable.
Anybody using robot for automated testing?
Pete

You can choose between using HTTP and HTTPS. Both use a proprietary protocol under the hood. You need to know that protocol I would think to be able to record and playback Forms traffic. Does Rational Robot claim support for Forms?

Similar Messages

Using a single website for testing while running older existing webpages

quick question guys
our company has an older existing webspace and website running
i'm currently re-doing the website and would like to test how it currently runs online but without disabling the existing older pages, how can this be done?
when i looked at the online space of the existing site via ftp program, it contains 4 folders:
cgi-bin
logs
private
public
public is where all the current website is housed. what are the other folders for? they are currently empty.
can i simply create a folder called test1 and upload all the files for the new site into this folder in the existing public folder and access it by simply using the "test1" folder in my webaddress?
eg. existing site:
www.website.com
test site:
www.website.com/test1
will this work? all my coding (js, css) has filepaths pointing to their respective folders from the root, ie "../css/website.css" etc. will all the root access to the new site work this way?
hope you understand my question.
thanks for any input

hey everyone
thanks so much for the answers and feedback
I eventually followed osgood's example and created a two letter folder (name "ts") and uploaded it to the public folder of our existing website with the relevant new files.
I was then able to access those files (well a single page right now) in browser by simply appending the folder name at the end of the existing webaddress:
acompany.net -existing page
acompany.net/ts/ - location of new webpage(s)
when i add more pages they should be referenced within this folder only,unless i have specific outside links to go to, correct?
i'm curious as to why there are so many various and warning messages about doing testing this way? is it really bad? will search engines remember these test pages and degrade the company's web prescence later?? i guess with larger corporate sites with hundreds of pages, more caution has to be used? I hope i'm not doing anything harmful to the existing webstanding of the online site.
osgood_ wrote:
I always include the test folder in the public folder to begin with but use a meta tag to stop search engines indexing the pages.
I'm always a bit nervous about moving things around once extensive testing has been undertaken incase something breaks
You could then just redirect the root level index file to point to the test folder, just rename the folder to something more discret like the initials of the company name.
so www.thiscompany/tc looks better than www.thiscompany/test
Of course if you have any absolute url coding in the site you will have to change that too so it points to the correct file. You'd have to do that anyway
This http://www.thiscompany.co.uk/test/images/image_1.jpg is not going to be the same as http://www.thiscompany.co.uk/images/image_1.jpg

Rational Robot and LabVIEW PDA collaboration

Does anybody have any experience/ideas for use of Rational Robot and LabVIEW? We have both software and hardware and were wondering if anyone had any ideas/suggestions/experience interfacing between these two.
Thanks ~ EUPECkat

Re-boujour,
Après une recherche un peu plus poussée, il apparaît que ce genre d'erreur est lié à des fichiers (DLL) manquants pour un chip du fabriquant FTDI. Serai-je complètement dans le faux?
Vous avez donc plus de chance de trouver des infos relatives à ce genre de soucis ici, et plus précisément dans la partie "support" auprès de personnes ayant déjà utilisé ce genre de DLL. Des exemples d'utilisation de ce genre de chip avec Labview sont disponibles ici.
En espérant que cela vous aide
Cordialement,
Mathieu STEINER
Mathieu Steiner, Test System Engineer, Safran Engineering
CLD, ISTQB

Install 11.1.2.4 on a single server for testing

I am not sure if anyone has installed 11.1.2.4 on a single server. If so can you please assit me. We are trying to consolidate some servers and would like to use a single server for testing of 11.1.2.4. Can this be done? Has anyone done this sucessfully or have any documents on how to do it on a single server.
Any input would help

If you are just looking for a quick environemnt to use for testing, and are not worried about the actual installation process, this might be useful:
Hyperion Error of the Day: EPMVirt: Oracle Hyperion 11.1.2.4 Virtual Environment
Nick

What physical iOS devices for testing?

Considering the current offering of iPhones and iPads today (sept 30th 2012), what devices should I purchase to do a "reasonable" testing for iOS apps? I mean, should I purchase all iPhones and iPads and test them all, like some Android developers do having dozens of Android devices for testing?
If possible, I'd like to use the iOS simulator for testing, and then test the app on no more than 1 or 2 real physical devices, because I tend to believe iOS doesn't have the same fragmentation of Android, but I ask because I want to know if my plan is reasonable, and how many physical devices would you test at least.

Ok, I didn't know that (because I'm not used to test all machines/OSX combinations for OSX applications, my experience with OSX says a few combinations are enough usually).
It wouldn't seem reasonable for me to buy 3 iPhones and 3 iPads in this moment. I think I'll start with just one device. If I get income from my apps, I'll buy a second one. But all devices I buy should be payed from the apps income, otherwise I wouldn't consider it reasonable.

Rational Robot Test Scripts for Oracle Application Vanilla Instance

Hi,
Does anybody have Rational Robot Test Scripts for Oracle Applications Vanilla Instance. We are in the process of automating testing. But for the same, we need to have the test scripts for the standard functionalities/flows.
Any help would be highly appreciated.
kanjurm

Hi;
I belive there is no sch a script as you mention. Please log a SR for your request
Regard
Helios

Using secatt for testing entire cycle

How can we use SECATT tool for testing the entire series of transactions to be used in logistics functions?
Example :
rfq
acceptance/rejections
purchase order
goods receipt
invoice verification
goods issue
inventory posting/stock transfer
all in a sequence?

Hi Chintan Chande,
Create eCATT scripts for each transaction and export the needed values in each script and use them as input variables in the next scripts.
Like, Script P_Order for PO, take the PO number and create a GR WRT to PO number.
Like wise you could link all your scripts to form a Scenario.
After creating individual scripts for each transactions, then create a master script wherein you encapsulate/refer all of them in here..
Like REF ( RFQ , RFQ_1 ).
REF ( INVENTORY , INVENTORY_1 ).
Also, following is the link of a weblog on SDN which gives step by setp details about chaining. It also explains the terms used with necessary details -
/people/sapna.modi/blog/2006/04/18/ecatt-chaining-parameterization-creation-of-test-datatest-configuration-system-data-part-iv
Also, you may also use this thread for your reference.. Though this is not exactly what you are looking for, but it would help you in your case even.
How to store export parameters in eCATT?
Hope this helps..
Best regards,
Harsha
PS: Reward points if this answers your query.

How to Use synchronous RFC calls during test run for remote accesses

there is a Setting for the usage of RFC accesses from a tested system
using eCATT.
'X' - Use asynchronous RFC calls during test run for remote accesses
' ' - Use synchronous RFC calls during test run for remote accesses
I developed an eCATT as following :
SAPGUI ( SAPGUI_1 , Target_system_1 ).
SAPGUI ( SAPGUI_2 , Target_system_2 ).
My question is how to run the eCATT in a synchronous RFC calls
PS: I do not want to change the Target_system to the same one in the
above script of ecatt.Because I need to run it in 2 different Target
systems sometime.
for example, I give a Target_system_3 when run this eCATT
I want the SAPGUI_1 and SAPGUI_2 run the Target_system_3 but not the
Target_system_1 or Target_system_2 .
Could you please tell me how to make it without the changes in script?
Edited by: Weitong Liu on Mar 24, 2011 9:44 AM

Hi Liu,
Weitong Liu wrote:
> ' ' - Use synchronous RFC calls during test run for remote accesses
This is the standard option value. Asynchronous are not the standard way and used only for very special purposes.
Weitong Liu wrote:
> I developed an eCATT as following :
> SAPGUI ( SAPGUI_1 , Target_system_1 ).
> SAPGUI ( SAPGUI_2 , Target_system_2 ).
> My question is how to run the eCATT in a synchronous RFC calls
The commands will be executed in sequence. So each call will be synchronously replayed against TS1 and TS2.
What is you issue with this standard procedure?
Kind regards,
Christoph

Have a test version in use for testing purposes and want to buy it now without loosung the files. How to do so?

I've a test version in use for testing purposes and want to buy it now without loosung the files.

Just buy it and enter your serial key.

Can I use NI TestStand for testing ZigBee and Bluetooth transceivers and processors

Hi , I should create , maintain snd excute software test plans for testing low power wireless networks such as ZigBee, Bluetooth using Python scripts and QA Methodology .The test design includes testing
RF transceivers, RF transmitters, RF receivers, System-on-Chips, Front Ends, ZigBee Processors, Bluetooth LE Processors, and RFID reader
I am a LabVIEW Developer and familiar with testing RF Components using NI Hardware such as PXIe system but I am new to TestStand and Python. Can I use Teststand to develop and deploy the tests for this purpose and also LabVIEW instead of Python
If it is possible could you please let me know that are the advantage and disadvantage of using LabVIEW and NI Test Stand for these kind of test design and implementation.
I greatly appercaite your help and advice on this matter .Many thanks.

Hi en99,
I am unsure what you mean by usign LabVIEW instead of Python - what part of the system would LabVIEW replace? Usually if you were using Python in automated test, it would be to handle the test processing, which in this case is done by TestStand.
As for advantages of TestStand over LabVIEW, the main one which SunRS mentioned is that TestStand has a test management engine, which covers result logging and passing test parameters to the various test modules, which can be written in many languages. As I mentioned above, it is Python which is commonly used to write alternative test managament engines. It is possible to write one in LabVIEW, but for good results it must be carefully architected and is typically a very time-consuming task if you want to keep it modular and use it for other applications. TestStand also has a number of built in tools which help to monitor various aspects of the test sequences, as well as provide multithreading optimisations.
I hope this helps

Using mac mini nearly for 3yrs. From few weeks i feel electric stock over it surface and on keyboard too. I Tested with current tester it showed electric flow

Using mac mini nearly for 3yrs. From few weeks i feel electric stock over it surface and on keyboard too. I Tested with current tester it showed electric flow

H.Kiran wrote:
Thank First
I just plug it to any plug in my house or my friend house before powering mac mini there is electric stock near power button
I took it to apple care center strangely there i could't feel too much as in my house the service center guy recommend me to go with three pin power cable.
I checked my house ground with technician everything is fine
I have another system (Window pc) plugged to same ups no problem
When i plugged my Apple keyboard to mac mini i feel electric stock but when plugged to pc no electeic stock & i tested it with electric tester
I am asking what the result of testing it with the the tester was.

I need to use an earlier version 3.5 for testing something. I have 3.6. How can I download and install 3.5?

I need to test a new learning management system used by my university in Firefox 3.5. This browser is certified for Blackboard 9.1 wheras 3.6 is not. I already upgraded to 3.6. How can I download and install 3.5?

My advice is to install the Firefox Portable version that you need for Blackboard on your computer, and use that installation only for Blackboard. Continue to use 3.6 for all other web browsing. <br />
FP 3.5.x is here: <br />
http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable/localization#legacy

Using MS FileSharingTestSuite for TESTING a LINUX Based SMB/CIFS implementation.

Hi,
I was trying to setup the MS File Sharing test suite for testing the below implementation.
Could please let me know if this use-case is supported. If not could please point me to
resources [Microsoft] which could help achieve this purpose effectively.
I want to test CIFS File server implementation running on Linux [SUSE Linux - Open Enterprise Server]
The client accessing the file services from above
CIFS server implementation is vastly
Windows clients.
Though would like to know ways of testing if the client is a Linux based desktop or a Mac based client as well in future.
For the above setup details I would like to know if and how we could create a "Driver
Computer" setup mainly. So we could use the File Sharing test suite to test against this Linux based CIFS server implementation.
And also the details on setting up the 'System Under Test (SUT)' , if any changes required[from what is documented in the "FileSharing_ServerUserGuide]" to
achieve the above.
Could kindly point me in the right direction to help achieve the above testing purpose.
Please let me know in case any details are required to help resolve the query.
Thanks for your time and help.
Regards,
Kavitha A

Hi,
Thanks for your time.
I am actually talking about using file sharing test suite provided My microsoft for testing a Linux Based CIFS/SMB implementation.
I have got my query answered via Mail from Microsoft dochelp team. hence marking this as resolved.
Posting the response /resolution from DOcHelp team on this thread for benefit of anyone looking for similar information/understanding:
If you are testing in a Workgroup scenario you need a Driver Computer and the System Under Test (SUT) computer.
In a domain-joined scenario, you need a DC somewhere in your environment to join the machines.
The guide document that comes with the test suite package provides guidance on what needs to be configured in each scenario.
The Driver Computer is the Windows machine where the synthetic test suite runs and simulates a client by emitting the protocol packets. The client sends packets to the file server
(the SUT) to test the server implementation of the protocol.
The SUT implements the server side of the protocol and the SUT can be running on any operating system.
For your convenience, you can setup a Windows SUT just for the purpose of understanding the test configuration on the driver client.
The document has instructions for Windows SUT and guidelines for non-Windows SUT as well. In your case, it’s a non-Windows SUT. You need to configure your server where your file
server implementation is running and setup the Driver computer to test your SUT.
I understand that your ultimate goal is to setup your own SUT on the SUSE Linux server.
Many customers have setup SUTs on CentOS, Ubuntu, etc. The flavor of the operating system is not relevant as such. The client simulator talks the SUT by following the protocol
packets.
Please go through the document step-by-step and I am sure it will come together.
Let’s me know whether you have any further questions.
I am not looking at CIFS share access from a Linux system. Otherwise would have posted in relevant Linux forums If looking for the same information. Thanks again for taking time to help though.

How to simulate a DAQ device and use it for testing applications without hardware???

how do i simulate a DAQ device
in MAX and use it for testing applications without hardware???
If my application requires inputs
from external hardware to proceed how can I simulate a DAQ device in LabVEIW?
i need to simulate several Digital inputs and Outputs to test the software. currently i dont have the hardware and DAQ device here.
please reply with your valuable suggestions.
many thanks in advance
RENN
Kudos always welcome for helpful posts
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi,
There is no option to simulate traditional device.You need hardware for that so i would suggest to simulate a PXI device which has similar configuration to PCI-6014 and to do a small modification to your application..

Can't use iPad for testing app

When I tried to run an app under development on my iPad 1, I get a message "a valid provisioning profile for this exectable was not found."
Under General > Profiles > the Develop App Games and Developer Provisioning are both green ticked as Verified.
So I can't use my iPad for testing the app, which was no problem when I was running OS Lion with XCode 4.2.
I'm now using Xcode 4.6 on Mountain Lion 10.8.2.
What could be the problem? Thank you.

Currently only a few Apps support casting to Chromecast. There is no mirroring support if that is what you are after.
Apps include Youtube, Google Chrome etc...
https://support.google.com/chromecast/answer/3006709?hl=en

Use Of Rational Robot for Testing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for