User only gets temprary profile on 2012 Terminal Server

Have a 3-Host Remote Desktop Services farm using 2012 R1. We are using User Profile Disks with "Store all user settings and data on the user profile disk" enabled. The user has full control rights to the UPD share and NTFS permissions.
One user cannot login with his standard profile - he keeps getting a temporary profile.
I have already tried deleting his SID from the profile list in the registry here: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\ProfileList
After I reboot and try logging his account in again, it will create a temporary profile and leave a .bak profile SID in the registry. I have tried renaming that to remove the .bak with no luck.
All other users don't seem to be having any issues.
I get Event ID 1515 on user profile service: "Windows has backed up this user profile. Windows will automatically try to use the backup profile the next time this user logs on."
And: Event ID 1511: Windows cannot find the local profile and is logging you on with a temporary profile.
Any ideas?

Hi,
Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
From your description it seems there is single User profile Disk issue. There is one related Hotfix for this issue, please try to install and check whether your issue been resolved.
FIX: You are logged on with a temporary profile to a remote desktop session after an unexpected restart of Windows Server 2012
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2896328
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Hi, that hotfix was already applied. Troubleshooting the issue further, it seemed that the user's UPD was locked or corrupted. After I had all users logoff the Terminal Servers, I rebooted the Server that was hosting the UPDs. After the reboot, the user's
profile loaded correctly on all Terminal Servers.

Similar Messages

On Windows 2012 Terminal Server Outlook fails to connect to Exchange 2013

I have a new install of Windows 2012.  I have two physical servers. One is a W2012 std Domain Controller ("DC"). The Second is configured as W2012 HyperV  ("HV"). Under HV I have
two VMs. One VM is W2012/Exchange 2013 ("ExchVM) and the other is W2012/Terminal Server ("VMTS"). All systems are behind a firewall appliance. Exchange is working via Outlook and OWA internally and externally. The self
created SSL must be installed manually on external machines since it comes up as an untrusted certificate. Once installed remote outlook works and OWA works. I have configured the terminal server and I am able
to login remotely as various users under my "TS group". The problem is when ever I attempt to open Outlook for the 1st time, it fails to connect to the exchange server.   (Open Outlook 2013, click next
on the splash screen, "Yes" Add an Email Account splash screen, click next, Auto Account screen populates NAME and Email Address correctly, click next, Searching for mail server settings..., check on establishing network connection, check on searching
for alias@ domain, then fails the logging on to the mail server) The error reads: "Outlook cannot log on. Verify you are connected to the network and are using the proper server and mailbox name. The
connection to Microsoft Exchange is unavailable. Outlook must be online or connected to complete this action."   I am connected in RDS from offsite, and from the RD session I can access shared folders on ExchVM and DC. I have
tried have verified the server Exchange server name is correct via "Get=ClientAccessServer" command. I have also tried to use the guid via "Get-Mailbox
ALIAS | fl name, exchangeguid. Keep in mind all desktop users on the network are connecting to Outlook without issue.
I would appreciate any thoughts on solving this issue.

Hi,
According to your workaround, it seems that the Outlook Anywhere configuration in Outlook client is not correct when using the Autodiscover service.
Once you connected to Exchange server by manually settings, please run Test E-mail AutoConfiguration tool in external Outlook client to check the autodiscover service:
open Outlook - press CTRL key - right click on the Outlook icon from right bottom corner taskbar - Test Email AutoConfiguration. Put your email address - uncheck use guessmart and secure guessmart authentication - click Test to check your Autodiscover service.
Please check the Log tab and confirm whether the Autodiscover service is connected successfully. Also confirm if the connection issue happens to all external users when they open Outlook for the 1st time. In Exchange server, please make sure
autodiscover.domain.com has been included in your Exchange certificate which is assigned with IIS service.
Regards,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support

Get SBO process id on terminal server

Hi All!
We are useing SBO on terminal server and I have problem to get the correct SBO's PID number. The main problem is, that there are running more than one SBO clients on the same server.
In normal case I used the code:
Dim MyProcs() As Process
dim i, ID as Integer
MyProcs = Process.GetProcessesByName("SAP Business One")
For i As Integer = 0 To MyProcs.Length - 1
ID = MyProcs(i).Id()
exit for
next
but now it is possible that i will get a PID belonging to an another SBO client.
Sorry for my bad english.
Thank you in advance!!
regards.
Tamas Berczes

Hi Alexey!
Thanks for your answer!
I made only a litle modification on your code to solve the problem.
The code
SBOApp.Desktop.Title = "SBO under " + SBOApp.Company.UserName;
modify only the main window title and not the process name. But your idea was very useful for me.
The modified code which is working is:
SBOApp.Desktop.Title="SBO under "+ SBOApp.Company.UserName
MyProcs = Process.GetProcessesByName("SAP Business One")
For i As Integer = 0 To MyProcs.Length - 1
If MyProcs(i).MainWindowTitle = SBOApp.Desktop.Title Then
//..my code
end if
next
Thanks
Tamas

One user has very slow network drives on terminal server.

Hello,
I am using a windows XP machine to connect to a 2003 terminal server. I have one user that was complaining about how long it took her to open files from a network share. I found that this is a problem with her account as it is slow no matter where she logs
in from. E.G when I log in to the server from my computer as me, it is quite fast, if I do the same but log in as her it is painfully slow accessing the network drives.
Does anyone has any ideas?Kind regards,
Chris

Hi Chris,
Thank you for your comment.
The issue seems it’s related to network problem, please check the network connection behavior. Network performance issues can also be caused by auto-tuning, because not all network devices support auto-tuning well. So try to disable the autotunning behavior
with below mention command and check the result.
netsh int tcp set global autotuninglevel=disabled
In addition check KB 885189 for slowness mapped drive issue to Server 2003. Apart from this, check the below article to make the network connection fast.
Windows 7 Network Slow
Hope it helps!
Thanks,
Dharmesh

One user (only) getting "disk full" errors for network home folder

I have a few users in my office with their home folders on the server. Everyone seems to be fine except this one person, who, a few times a day, gets an error saying that there is no space in his home folder and a program can't save preferences or Mail can't write new mail to disk.
I don't have quotas turned on, and there is 120gb free on the disk with the home folders.
Has anyone experienced this before and know what the solution is? It's Server 10.3.9 and workstation 10.4.4.

I have about 100 Portable home users also here and only a few are affected with this issue. Their home folder on the server is 15GB but can't write more then 3.5GB to the server. It is very wierd.

Installing terminal server role on windows server 2012 to use for Windows server 2008 R2 machines.

Dear
Our current setup is as follows :-
Active Driectory is in Windows Server 2003.
Citrix Xenapp version 5.6 with all Xenapp servers in Windows Server 2003
Now we are upgrading our Citrix farm to 6.5 and all Xen app servers into Windows Server 2008R2.
We did the configuration and testing; everything works fine except the terminal server is not configured which gives the pop always for the expiry date.
We do have license for 2012 terminal server which is not possible to downgrade for some reason and managent need to install new Windows Server 2012 for terminal server and activte the licenses.
My question is :-
1 Whether Windows Server 2008 R2 will get RDS cal license from Windows Server 2012 terminal server (RDS CAL license is of windows server 2012).
2. What is the role and features I need to activate in Server 2012 in order to use for Citrix 6.5 (only applicable fetaure for getting the RDS cal license.)
3. Whether I can add this 2012 server into domain. Is it possible to add 2012 server into Windows Server 2003 AD.
Your early reply is highly appreciated.

Thanks Jeremy..
I got exactly the right answers I am lookoing for ..
I successfully activated the terminal service on the newly created Windows 2012 Server and installed the retail license pack we had of 50+50+25 keys . It later shows the 125 keys successfully applied.
when I tried to link the Xenapp (Windows Server2008R2) to the license server, it first gives me error that session host service role is not installed on the ternial server. So I installed that role also in the terminal server.
But now its anothee error as below.
RDS Cals are not available for this Remote Desktop Session host server, and licensing Diagnostic has identified licensing problems for the RD session host server.
1. Is it wrong I did by installing session host server role into the terminal server (but really it gave me error like 'session host server role is not running on the license server' when I tried to link the license server).
2. Is it the problem that Windows Server 2008 R2 will not get license from 2012 RDS CAL license.
3. whether Clearing house will take time to update the license.
Your reply is highly appreciated. I need to know whether any other way I can link the Windows Server 2008 R2 Servers (Xenapp) to the license server.

Downloadable ACL for users only?

Hello all,
in ACS 5.4 I need customized ACL for users only.
My scenario:
There is a way to use some "Downloadable ACLs" in authorization profile but I want to define specific ACLs for some exeptions. For example: User A and user B get autorization profile "X". But user B is not allowed to access on a host. This "Deny rule" I will configure with custom attributes in the internal user store.
Is that possible? How can I implement this rule?
best regards,
Stefan

Hi,
You can do this by following these steps:
1. Set a user defined dictionary attribute under System Administration > Dictionary > Identity >Internal Users name it what you want and make sure the value is string
2. Create the DACL in Named Permission Objects under the policy elements section
3. Under the user account you will now see a filed for the dictionary name you called in step 1, make sure the filed matches the dacl you created in step 2
4. Create your authorization profile under "common tasks" Set Dynamic as the DACL drop down select Internal Users and set the value to the attribute you created in step1.
5 map the authorization policy to the access policy using the conditions that will give you these results.
6. test and you should have what you are looking for.
Thanks,
Tarik Admani
*Please rate helpful posts*

Windows Terminal Server 2012 wont publish any more remote apps!

I have a weird problem with our new Windows 2012 Terminal Server. We have already published one application through a session collection via Remote Desktop Services. We now have the need to publish another application. When I click on the "Tasks"
drop down menu and select "Publish RemoteApp Programs" I get an error of "Server.domain.local is not available on the network. Verify that the server is available on the network or remove the server from the collection"
Does anyone have any ideas why I am seeing this?
Thanks

Hi,
Thank you for your posting in Windows Server Forum.
First of all please check that you have enough permission or performing with admin account.
I have installed many RemoteApp in my environment and can’t find this error until now.
Have you recently made any changes in your environment before facing this issue?
Did you tried to restart the server and then try to launch new Remote App?
By the way, can you let us know which program you want to publish as Remote App, so if possible then we can try to install and let you know the result.
In meantime, please try to publish new RemoteApp with PowerShell command as Administrator and let us know the result. You can try below command. In this example, we create a RemoteApp to deliver WordPad. We use the following command;
new-rdremoteapp -Alias Wordpad -DisplayName WordPad -FilePath "C:\Program Files\Windows NT\Accessories\wordpad.exe" -ShowInWebAccess 1 -collectionname MySessionCollection -ConnectionBroker LS01.CRFB.Local
For more information, refer beneath article.
Managing Remote Apps using PowerShell on Windows Server 2012
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki

Windows terminal server 2003 cluster

We have a FOG with three Solaris 10 x86 servers, SRSS 4.2, SRWC 2.3 with the latest SRSS 4.2 patches. All Sunrays have the latest firmware.
Kiosk settings points to a windows 2003 terminal server cluster. The two nodes in the windows cluster have latest SRWC 2.0.
The cluster entitles, two terminal servers and a session manager server, we use roaming profiles.
When pointing kiosk settings to the cluster FQDN the sunray sessions are routed to just one server in the windows cluster. But if we RDP to Cluster's FQDN from a regular desktop the windows cluster load balances properly.
I do need help understanding how SRSS handles sessions? specifically if nodes are behind a cluster with session manager. Could it be that the session manager it's incompatible with SRSS in kiosk mode since it tries to route sessions at the mean time SRSS is doing the same task?
Thanks,
RE
Edited by: estrar on Dec 5, 2010 5:43 PM

Hi Estrar,
Short answer: 2003 Session Directory does not do load balancing.
Long answer (to the above and your other questions):
The Sun Ray Server doesn't do anything with regards to load balancing the windows sessions. To the Sun Ray Server, or more appropriately the windows connector, it's just making the connection you tell it to.
With regards to the windows client "working", am I correct in guessing that you ran subsequent instances of MS-RDC to "prove" that it worked?
Most likely what happened there is that the PC, thus MS-RDC, received different IP addresses back from DNS for the FQDN with each launch. This is basically round robin, not load balancing. But I'd have to understand how you've done the FQDN of the cluster in DNS.
The most common initial reaction is that the DNS server is setup incorrectly (I'll plead guilty that I've had the same reaction). It is true that some DNS servers can be configured will return the same IP on the first dns query. This is called a cyclic ordering and results in the IP address of the resolved name every client to be identical. For example, if a DNS server is set for cyclic ordering, every first request for the IP of server A for xyz.com will be the same on all clients. The second query from the same client should result in server B being resolved, if not, then you do have a DNS problem.. However, in the case of Sun Ray Server, the "second query from the same client" would be the second session coming up, since, as far as the DNS server is concerned, all the Sun Ray session are coming from the same client. Therefore, even with cyclic ordering, round robin should work even better in a Sun Ray environment then a "fat" client environment. You can check the documentation for specific DNS servers on how to set a random order for round robin (which should be the default), but chasing down cyclic ordering of RR entries as a cause to this "issue" is basically a red herring in a Sun Ray environment.
More than likely the same IP being returned everytime is a side effect of the name service caching daemon (nscd). The job of nscd is to speed up name resolution. However, ncsd will break any round robin scheme as it caches the first server returned by the first query from the caller (i.e. the host doing the name lookup, aka the Sun Ray server) and all applications on the caller will use that address for the lifetime of the cache. The default lifetime of the nscd cache is 3600 seconds (an hour). To disable the name service caching daemon, run the following command on every Sun Ray server in the host group (aka FOG): svcadm disable system/name-service-cache
An über smart colleague mentioned the possibility of another problem that could exist even if nscd is disabled and the hosts are on the same subnet as the caller . This has to do with default behavior of the Solaris resolver library putting servers that reside on the same subnet as the caller at the top of the sort order. You can read the notes in the man page for "gethostbyname" and also the man page for nss(4) for more information, but both reference how this behavior can break round robin. The fix is to edit /etc/default/nss and uncomment (or add) the statement SORT_ADDRS=FALSE
While those two things will allow a Solaris based Sun Ray server (or any Solaris client) to properly recognize round robin entries, it still holds true that 2003 Session Directory does not do load balancing. The only role of session directory is to ensure that you don't get routed to a different terminal server in case you have an existing session on another server. Round Robin + Session Directory may be all you need, but bear in mind that it is not "load balancing". Users could still connect directly to one of the IP addresses vs the round robin DNS name and that would defeat the round robin scheme in place.
Load balancing is a separate component in 2003, either using an external device like F5's BigIP or using Windows Network Load Balancing (NLB) service.
The type of load balancing solution that can be used depends on what is meant when you use the term "cluster". If the cluster is a real implementation of Windows 2003 Clustering (i.e.the type of cluster you'd use for SQL, Exchange, etc) then you can't use NLB and would have to use an external load balancer. Sun Ray Windows Connector supports either IP based or token based load balancers, though we don't certify any third party products in this regard.
"Cluster confusion" occurs because Session Directory itself is supported by Windows 2003 Clustering in order to provide a highly available directory service. Easy to see how this would be desirable with a large number of terminal servers. However, NLB does not work, nor is it supported on Windows 2003 Cluster.
To further the confusion, when NLB is enabled on the NIC that is handling RDP traffic, one of the configuration tabs is "Cluster Parameters". But it is important to realize that this has nothing to do with Windows 2003 Clustering and is in fact incompatible with it. NLB makes use of independent servers (i.e. not clustered), which the primary requirement of those servers is that they are on the same subnet.
Finally, it is easy to get confused between 2003 and 2008 session directory when it comes to load balancing, but they are very different. 2008 "session directory" does do load balancing. In fact, to underscore this distinction/feature, Microsoft has renamed Session Directory to TS Session Broker. (See http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc772418%28WS.10%29.aspx)
To summarize, with Windows 2003 you have two choices when it comes to load balancing and session directory.
1) Have a HA implementation of Session Directory and use an external load balancer
2) Have non-HA implementation of session directory and use NLB to do load balancing.
Good how to article on setting NLB on 2003 with terminal services here:
http://www.brianmadden.com/blogs/brianmadden/archive/2004/11/29/how-to-configure-windows-network-load-balancing-for-pure-terminal-server-environments.aspx

FreeRadius and Cisco 2600 Terminal Server [IOS 12.1(3)T]

Hi Cisco People
I'm using FreeRadius 2 and Cisco 2600 Terminal server to coordinate access to cisco routers based on time‏ ranges.
Basically we are an education/training environment where we have some students accessing the routers and switches for practise, terminal server are used to consolidate the console access, and these terminal servers authenticate the users through a Radius server (as shown in the following figure). Additionally, the students are categorized into few groups. We want to implement policy on the radius server so that only a certain group can access the resources in a given duration of time (the user should be dropped from the terminal when the subscribed time is reached and cannot access thereafter .)
+++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++
+ User +++++++++++++++++++++++ Cisco 2600 +++++++++++++++++++++ Network +
+ + + Terminal Serv + + Devices +
+++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++
(NAS)
+
+
+++++++++++++++
+ FreeRadius +
+++++++++++++++
Right now I'm able to do the "hello-world" setup with the following users and clients.conf. On the terminal server side, aaa new-model is enabled on the cisco terminal server to communicate with this radius server.
users
=============
cisco Auth-Type := System
Service-Type = NAS-Prompt-User,
cisco-avpair = "shell:priv-lvl=15"
clients.conf
==============
client 192.168.1.1 {
secret = SECRET_KEY
shortname = termserver
nastype = cisco
A typical transaction would be :
Access-Request
=======
NAS-IP-Address = 192.168.1.1
NAS-Port = 35
NAS-Port-Type = Async
User-Name = "cisco"
Calling-Station-Id = "1.1.1.1"
  User-Password = "cisco"
Access-Accept
=======
Service-Type = NAS-Prompt-User
Cisco-AVPair = "shell:priv-lvl=15"
This works fine but doesn't provide any timing limitations. So I have modified the FreeRadius config to be :
users
=============
cisco Auth-Type := System
Service-Type = NAS-Prompt-User,
cisco-avpair = "shell:priv-lvl=15",
Session-Timeout = 20
Cisco Terminal Server
==============
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login default group radius local none
aaa authorization exec default group radius if-authenticated
aaa accounting exec default start-stop group radius
aaa accounting network default start-stop group radius
aaa accounting connection default start-stop group radius
After this, I am able to see that the terminal server actually receives an Access-Accept including the Session-Timeout attributes like the following :
Service-Type = NAS-Prompt-User
Cisco-AVPair = "shell:priv-lvl=15"
Session-Timeout = 20
But the problem is that it doesn't really terminate the session after the 20 seconds are reached . My questions is that :
1. Is the terminal server really able to enforce such time limit after receiving the attribute ?
2. Is the 2600 terminal server  with [IOS 12.1(3)T] compliant with RFC 2865?
3. What can I do so that the terminal server forces the user to be logged out after the session time limit is reached ?
Thanks
Frank

Frank,
I think you should use the login time s well:
Login-Time
Login-Time is a very powerful internal check AVP. It allows flexible authorization and its value is used by the logintime (rlm_logintime) module to determine if a person is allowed to authenticate to the FreeRADIUS server or not. This value is also used to calculate the Session-Timeout reply value. Session-Timeout is subsequently used by the NAS to limit access time.
The following line will grant Alice access only between 08:00 and 18:00 each day.
"alice" Cleartext-Password := "passme", Login-Time := 'Al0800-1800'
The logintime module will calculate the reply value of Session-Timeout if Alice has logged in within the permitted timeslots to inform the NAS how long she is allowed to stay connected. If Alice tries to access the network when she is not permitted, the request will be rejected.
http://www.packtpub.com/article/getting-started-with-freeradius
http://wiki.freeradius.org/config/Users
yes, the terminal server is RFC 2865 compliant.
Rate if Useful :)
Sharing knowledge makes you Immortal.
Regards,
Ed

Embedded Menu Manager for Terminal Server

Has anyone use EMM as a nice friendly interface for their terminal server (ie router with NM-16A and octal cables)?
when I ask the framework to run the following command it gets stuck will a blinking cursor and clear screen
            <IOSExecCommand>"connect 10.1.1.1 2000"</IOSExecCommand>
however removing the port number allows it to connect fine.
            <IOSExecCommand>"connect 10.1.1.1"</IOSExecCommand>
same symptom if iI were to replace connect with telnet
            <IOSExecCommand>"telnet 10.1.1.1 2000"</IOSExecCommand>
even setting up an iphost does the same ie:
               ip host R1 2000 10.1.1.1
            <IOSExecCommand>"connect R1"</IOSExecCommand>
All of these commands work fine from the # prompt

I'm suprised any of these work as they are all interactive commands. You must be running an earlier version of IOS. You can only run EXEC commands that will return you to a prompt without user intervention. Using EMM as a terminal server menu is not going to work. However, what you could do is have a classic IOS menu call the emm command when one option is selected. That could take you to a guided menu that allows one to perform additional commands other than connect to device consoles.

How to move all files from a folder for a user to a centralized folder on a core server with a GP

Hello,
I was curious if someone know how to move all the files of a user "local" profile on a Terminal Server to that of a centralized server where the "local" profile of like the user desktop, favorites, setting, etc are stored in the event
the local profile on the TS become corrupt it can pull from this server...
The problem I have is no matter what I tell users to save there files to our Y drive that is a folder that is synced
across all 6 of our TS servers, users still store files on there desktops, so as you can imagine if one day they are on one server, then next day they could be on another and there files aren't the same.... hence the reason why I want to move all there files
to the centralized server so when I redo the profiles from scratch on the TS server in the farm they suck files from the core server and have all of the files they are used to having....
So I was curious and I've heard from some this is possible in a GP, but I'd like to move the contents of all 6 TS for
each user or if I have to d this on per user basis I will, just looking for a way to move the files....

Hi Trevor,
To move all users’ desktop to a server, we can use Folder Redirection to do this. The path for Folder Redirection is:
[Group Policy Object Name]\User Configuration\Policies\Windows Settings\Folder Redirection
In this situation, we can choose to redirect desktop to the root of a network file share or a folder on a network share.
Regarding how to configure this, the following article can be referred to for more information.
Configuring Folder Redirection
http://technet.microsoft.com/library/cc786749.aspx
Hope it helps.
Best regards,
Frank Shen

Can't connect to terminal server via Mac RDC

Users can't log in to our terminal server (Server 2008) from Mac using RDC 2.1. After typing in the server name, the client asks the user to login. The user fills in their username, password and domain but receives and error stating "The credentials
that were used to connect to [server_name} are incorrect".
Any user, including myself who am a Domain Admin, get this error. When I log in using the domain's Administrator account, however, I can log in just fine.
None of this occurs when trying to login from a Windows client. The Mac I tested on is running OS X 10.5.8. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

Hi,
For remote desktop in MAC OS, you can try to update the new Remote Desktop Connection. New Multiple Session Support gives Mac users simultaneous access to multiple
Windows-based PCs or to a network server that hosts remote applications and files. Since it is a Universal application, Remote Desktop Connection Client 2 is compatible with the latest technologies on Windows and Mac platforms.
Please refer to the following link:
Microsoft Remote Desktop Connection Client for Mac 2.1.1
http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?displaylang=en&id=18140
Setting 'Allow connections from computers running any version of Remote Desktop (less secure)' in the Terminal server to sees if it’s work well.
Technology changes life……

Move Terminal server licenses to another server

We have one terminal server VM hosted in hyper v server. currently there is a problem with the hyper v server hdd and we might need to rebuild the whole server. We would like to setup a new terminal server on a new server. The existing terminal server is
windows server 2003. After I fresh setup the Windows server 2003 VM in a new server, how do I move the terminal server license to a new server? FYI, we would like to decommission the old terminal server. But we would like to do it in parallel as there are
many users are still accessing to the old terminal server.
Thanks so much.
Regards,
Henry

Hi Henry,
First you need to gather your licensing paperwork, authorization number(s), license number(s), etc. for your existing licenses. This step is critical.
Next install RD Licensing on the replacement 2003 server, Activate it using Terminal Server Licensing (licmgr.exe), then install the TS CALs. If you receive an error when installing the old TS CALs please contact the Clearinghouse and explain
to them you need to install the TS CALs on a new server because the old one is being decommissioned.
How to locate a telephone number for the Microsoft Clearinghouse
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/291795
Once you have confirmed that the old TS CALs are installed on the replacement 2003 TS then make sure your 2003 TS is set to the correct Licensing mode (to match the type of TS CALs) and you have Specified the name of the new RD Licensing server.
You do this in Terminal Services Configuration (tscc.msc) on the replacement terminal server.
As an alternative you could install the existing TS CALs on a newer RD Licensing server such as Server 2008 R2, Server 2012, etc. You still will need to have the authorization number(s), license number(s), etc. for the existing 2003 TS CALs.
How to move Terminal Services CALs from one license server to another in Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2008
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/953918
-TP

Outlook 2010 on Terminal Server, default timezone resetting to Central America time on log of

First, thanks for reading!
We have a user that travels frequently and uses Terminal Server often to connect. In his Outlook profile on the Terminal Server we have a default and secondary time zone set for him, as he travels through time zones often and wants to know what is when even
in other parts of the country. Just about every time he logs off and back on, his primary time zone is set to (UTC -06:00) Central Time (US & Canada) which is wrong, and his previous, correct, default time zone is then set to his secondary time zone. The
previous secondary time zone is of course wiped out.
His laptop is fine and does not do this under any circumstances. Has anyone seen this behavior before? I have already blown out the local profile on the Terminal Server, I'm at a loss here.
Thanks in advance for any and all help.

Are you in Citrix environment? Take a look at this article:
http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX303498
Do you have the 'use local client time' applied?
We're unfortunately in a stock Terminal Server environment, but I'll take a look! Thanks for the link.
We do have Terminal Server pulling time form clients when they connect, so ill take a hard look.

User only gets temprary profile on 2012 Terminal Server

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for