User permission to selected forms

I am ready to deploy I want to send an invite to a user but only what him/her to access certain forms/folders without accessing the other folders

Hi，
I agree with Sudip Misra, you need to break permissions inheritance,
and then grant permission to those folder/form which you want to share and choose sending email.
Here is an article about editing permissions for a list, library, or individual item, you can take a look at:
https://support.office.com/en-gb/article/Finetune-permissions-for-content-5b900de3-9123-41c9-aa04-919ae6606d40
Best Regards,
Lisa Chen
Lisa Chen
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

Odd Behaviour using User Variables to select members in Planning form

I have a form to enter budget adjustments and another form to review the effects of those adjustments at a parent Entity level.
For each area of the business there are obviously different adjustment and parent levels required in the form.
In summary I can drive a form from a User Variable using the functions (Children, IChildren, ILvl0Descendants, Descendants and IDescendants) but trying to use other options results in unexpected behaviour.
For example with the following structure:
Entity
-Total Cost Centre
--Group A
---SubGroupA1
---SubGroupA2
---SubGroupA3
---GroupA-Adj
----GroupA-AdjX
-----AdjEntityA1
-----AdjEntityA2
--Group B
---SubGroupB1
---SubGroupB2
---SubGroupB3
---GroupB-Adj
----GroupB-AdjX
-----AdjEntityB1
-----AdjEntityB2
For the adjustment entry form the users would want to see AdjEntityA1 and AdjEntityA2 if they are in business group A.
For the review form they would like to see Group A and its children.
I am trying to avoid writing multiple forms for each business user (largely because the number of groups can vary dramatically). I can't really use generations to drive the selections as whilst the business has effectively levelled the hierarchy business units can be working at different levels of this hierarchy.
I want to offer a couple of options to the business. One will be to define a form that pulls all of the relevant entities into the form and relies on security to restrict the values displayed to the user. The second option would be to utilise User Variables to drive selections. It is the second option I am struggling with.
If we consider a user working in Group A, I think I can see a formulaic way to select the various combinations of Entities if I set the user variable to be GroupA-Adj.
I can define a data form that sets Entity to the L0Descendants of say GroupA-Adj and this is fine.
When I try to define a review form that selects the Isiblings and Parent of GroupA-Adj I hit a problem.
It seems that Children, IChildren, ILvl0Descendants, Descendants and IDescendants works as I would expect.
Using IAncestors and IParents return just the User Variable setting (i.e. just the 'I' part, not the parents or Ancestors).
Siblings, Isiblings, Parents, Ancestors all result in an error message because not all dimensions are represented in the form.
This prevents me using a User Variable to build the review form in which I would like to display the siblings and parent of the entity GroupA-Adj.
Anyone got any ideas?

I would love to see the ability to select EDA's from Planning Forms, it would definately make life a little easier.
As CL says, attributes are great at filtering forms and BR's, their only drawback is that you can only use them on sparse dimensional members.
To get round this problem i've relied on security to filter out the accounts i do not need to see in the forms for the specific users, and kept the form selection on @IDESCENDANTS(Account_Parent).
If you wish to filter on the Period dimension and this is a dense dimension, can you not get round the problem with rollups and, for example, @DESCENDANTS(Q1) to only return 3 months in the form, it really depends on your outline structure.

How can I allow users to save fillable forms I've created in Acrobat 9 Pro?

Do I have to use Live Cyle Designer? I require all users to use Acrobat Reader 11 so I do not have to Reader Enable each form, which is a hassle.

No, you don't need to use LiveCycle Designer. To create a form, first create the PDF and open it in Acrobat. You can then add the form fields by selecting: Forms > Add or Edit Fields
It will ask you if you want Acrobat to attempt to create fields automatically where it thinks they should be. The form will then be opened in form editing mode and you can add/edit the fields.

Deny user from seeing/selecting from tables but allow access to certain view

Need some assistance. I have a database on SQL Server 2008 R2. Using windows authentication and a custom group, I control who can access the database and serve up the data via a web application.
I now have a requirement to allow users to connect to the data using Power Pivot, but do not want to allow users to see all tables/views, I want explicitly control what they see.
How do I lock everything down so that users can still view the data from a defined view but limit access to the other tables and views ?
In essence, my users should not be able to see/select from any of the tables or views except for a specific view that I want them to have access to.
Thanks

If the View and the Table are in the same database and have the same owner, then a user who has SELECT permission on the View does not require any permissions on the table.
See
Ownership Chains
David
David http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dbrowne/
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dbrowne/

Best way to create a multiple select form?

I have been trying to create a form that will allow selection parameters to be entered to populate a list that the user can then select one or more of the values in the list for use in another form.
The following is the code I have come up with so far:
DECLARE
lc_query VARCHAR2(32767);
lc_where VARCHAR(4000);
BEGIN
lc_query := 'SELECT HTMLDB_ITEM.CHECKBOX(1,ROWNUM) AS prd_check, '||
' HTMLDB_ITEM.HIDDEN(2,a.asset_id) AS asset_id, '||
' sup.name||'' ''||prd.description|| '||'' Asset Tag:''||a.asset_tag '||'' Serial Number:''||a.serial_number AS asset_name '||
'FROM supplier sup, '||
' product prd, '||
' asset a '||
'WHERE a.prd_id = prd.prd_id '||
'AND prd.sup_id = sup.sup_id '||
'AND a.hardware_software = ''HDW'' '||
'AND a.responsibility_indicator IN (''1'',''2'',''4'',''9'') ';
IF :P4_AT_ID <> -1 THEN
lc_where := lc_where ||' AND a.at_id = :P4_AT_ID';
END IF;
IF :P4_SUP_ID <> -1 THEN
lc_where := lc_where ||' AND prd.sup_id = :P4_SUP_ID';
END IF;
IF :P4_PRD_ID <> -1 THEN
lc_where := lc_where ||' AND a.prd_id = :P4_PRD_ID';
END IF;
IF :P4_SELECTION IS NOT NULL THEN
lc_where := lc_where
||' AND ( UPPER(a.asset_tag) LIKE ''%''||UPPER(:P4_SELECTION)||''%''
OR UPPER(a.serial_number) LIKE ''%''||UPPER(:P4_SELECTION)||''%''
OR UPPER(a.reference_number) LIKE ''%''||UPPER(:P4_SELECTION)||''%''
OR UPPER(prd.description) LIKE ''%''||UPPER(:P4_SELECTION)||''%'' ) ';
END IF;
lc_query := lc_query ||lc_where;
RETURN lc_query;
END;
I then call the following process that calls a package to insert the rows into my base table of the calling form:
DECLARE
l_asset_id NUMBER;
BEGIN
IF HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01.COUNT > 0 THEN
FOR i IN 1..HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01.COUNT LOOP
l_asset_id := TO_NUMBER(HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F02(HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01(i)));
survey_pkg.p_ins_ua ( p_prsn_id => TO_NUMBER(:P4_PRSN_ID),
p_asset_id => l_asset_id,
p_eftv_from => TRUNC(SYSDATE));
END LOOP;
END IF;
END;
However, if the search query does not narrow down enough rows (about 50 rows) I get an ORA-01403 error on selection of the rows.
Question:
Is this the correct approach?
If YES then does anyone know where I have gone wrong?
If NO then what is a better approach?
Thanks in anticipation,
Jon

In the end I abandonded the use of using HTMLDB_ITEM and HTMLDB_APPLICATION packages and went back to more standard functionality.
Rather than developing a report using the function above I instead created a multi-select list ITEM and created a List of Values for this based on the function above. This then changes the values in the list on change of my selection criteria. The underlying item then provides my input into my package to create values in the other form, much tidier solution!

Autonomous transaction - user updating information through form

Good afternoon,
I have a form that has a database datablock that is populated using a cursor that does a select on 4 tables, being one the most important (table A). When the user is done he commits the changes and the information is saved in table B, the "source" of the datablock.
This generates a concurrency problem: if two users give the same parameters the cursor populates the same information in their respective sessions and the information is saved twice. I want to prevent this, only one person should be allowed to use the information.
I know about autonomous transactions and perhaps this is the best idea: update the status of the row in table A in order to prevent any further uses but i want to check any other solution. Perhaps i could write the user and the time and the second person would get a message: "being used by"
Thanks,

Yes i too have read about autonomous transaction and its very rare usability.
Ok here's the situation:
Table B
code_B (number) PK
code_B1 (number PK
description
selected (Y/N), default N
more fields...
Table A
code_A PK
description
code_B NOT part of PK_A
code_B1 NOT part of PK_A
more fields
step 1: user opens form X and marks some records from table B, setting selected to Y
step 2: User open forms Y and populates block Z (table A) based on a cursor (PL/sql run through a push button) that looks for all the records from B that have selected = Y
step 3: user commits and the form updates table A with new records
this is the normal procedure but sometimes two users open form Y at almost the same time and the both populate the datablock Z with the same info.
I have thought about creating a new hidden datablock in form Y that uses table B, in order to block other users.
and these forms have been like this for years now, i did not create them and the tables have millions of records now...
This was a design flaw, not taking concurrency into account i guess
Many thanks
Edited by: user474437 on Apr 17, 2010 10:38 AM

Disappearing user permission

Hi
Yesterday I was called by one our sharepoint user and he told me that he does not have access to a folder from library. The day before he had access to this folder. To find out what happed with user permission I ran Security Audit Report on Sharepoint and
did not find some security modification for this folder. That folder has broken permission . Could you tell me what could cause user disappearing from folder permision ??
We use Sharepoint 2010 SP2.
Thanks

You may have:
1- An automated agent reseting permissions (a software, a script...)
2- A corrupted NTFS object
3- Another administrator on your company (maybe he's created a thread to report misteriously permissions appearing)
Either way, auditing permission changes will do the trick. Proceed as follows:
1- Enable auditing for oject access (secpol.msc or via policy)
2- In the folder's security tab click on advanced, auditing.
3- Click on Add, type Everyone and click OK.
4- In Apply onto, select "this folder only"
5- Check "change permissions" for successful and failed.
6- OK
Permission changes will appear in security event log.
reference url
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/c17ba53a-5919-4327-a9b9-727d6be299eb/permissions-disappearing-from-folders
Thanks
Jaison A
http://infomoss.blogspot.in

Fullname on selection forms

Anyone know any way I can get the fullname to display on the user selection forms for manager, delegation, etc...? Currently, accountID is all that is shown. This is very un-user-friendly when the customer uses cryptic accountIds.
Thanks!
Message was edited by:
TD_ROC

Can you be more clear on what is required?IDM has Account Id which is the userid, First Name which is the Christan name, and Last Name which is the surname. Most of the organisations that I have worked at use a cryptic naming convention for the account id which has no resemblance to a persons name. So on the user creation and modification pages where you enter the manager details in you are expected to put in the Account Id of the Manager.
You can see another example of this in action in the Find Users tab under Accounts (IDM 7.0) where the search criteria can be Name (which is the Account Id), Email Address, Last Name or First Name.

Iphoto user permission repair

I recently shared my iphoto library with another user on my Macbook. Now every time either one of us opens iphoto (when it is closed in the other's account) it asks to "repair user permission". Do we have to do this each time now? Also, this requires Photostream to re-upload pictures which is tedious.
Another question - why can't I see my Hard Drive folder in Finder?

The easy answer first:
Another question - why can't I see my Hard Drive folder in Finder?
Click somewhere on your Desktop, to bring the Finder forward. Then open the Finder's Preferences "Finder > Preferences"
In the "General" tab of the Preferences select everything you want to see on your Desktop.
Do the same for your Sidebar.
The "Permissions" problem is more tricky. Each time one of you repairs the permission of the iPhoto library, you make yourself the owner and the other user will need to repair the permissions again to be able to writs to the shared iPhoto Library or to edit a photo.
See this document: iPhoto: Sharing libraries among multiple users
Sharing is best done by putting the iPhoto library onto a separate disk partition or an external drive. Then you can set the "Ignore Ownership on this volume" flag, and you do not need to repair permissions. This flag is set from the "Get Info" panel. Select the Disk Parition or external volume, press "⌘I" for "Get Info", and reveal the "Sharing and Permissions" brick of the panel. Click the padlock icon, authorize, and enable the flag:
Make sure, any drive or partition you are using for your iPhoto Library is formatted "MacOS X Extended (Journaled). If you want to use a drive previously used with Windows, reformat it using Disk Utility.
Regards
Léonie

Document selection form

would like to create a pdf form checklist for users to select check off certain pdf pages or documents they want built into a single pdf document.
how do i build the checklist (with links?) so when a user makes their selections and then submits the checklist a new pdf document is automatically created with just the pages they selected?
the users will only have acrobat reader.
any ideas would be appreciated.

This forum is for the Adobe FormsCentral (formscentral.adobe.com) which is a service that allows you to create, collect and analyze data using an online web form. You should ask PDF related form questions in the Acrobat forums: http://forums.adobe.com/community/acrobat/acrobat_windows
I'll move your post to that forum so you don't need to retype it. They can help you out...
Randy

Override Batch Numbers Selection Form

Hi everyone,
i need to implement a slightly different batch number selection form to handle two different units of measure (Kg & Number of Items). Is there any way to override the SAP form and then feed our own values to the document form?
I couldn't understand how/where SAP stores this information once the user selected the batch numbers and returned to the document.
Can anyone help me with this?
Thank you very much
David

Hello David,
You cannot override this form, but you can override batch selection method.
On Bacth selection form you have 3 matrixes. in these 3 controls you can find all the relevant informations what you need.
I used them to change the selection method to FeFo (First Expires First Out) or FiFo (First In First Out) in the developments.
Regards
J

How to give an user permission to access centain Transformations?

I would like to know how to give an user permission to access centain Transformations in one InfoArea only. I already limited the selection in one InfoArea now. I want users can only Display Transformations for all the InfoObjects under this InfoArea. Does anyone know the detail steps? Thanks!

HI,
are you working under Analysis Auth (BI7) or Reporting Auth (BW 3.X)?
If you work with the new concept you can restrict your authorization by using theinfoobjet: 0TCAIFAREA.
before you Add 0TCAIFAREA as an external hierarchy characteristic to 0INFOPROV also when you restrict your auth by infoprovider you can choose the infoarea hierarchy
hope it help
Regard's

User Authorization on Customize Forms(User Forms)

Hi Experts,
I want to implement authorization on Customize forms by code... i am using .NET Framework with C# for development.... please guides me...
thanks
deepak

Dear Deepak Gaur,
Here the sample code from SDK help:
Adding a PermissionTree - parent object (Visual Basic)
[Visual Basic]
Dim RetVal As Long
Dim ErrCode As Long
Dim ErrMsg As String
Dim mUserPermission As SAPbobsCOM.UserPermissionTree
Set mUserPermission = oCompany.GetBusinessObject(oUserPermissionTree)
'//Mandatory field, which is the key of the object.
'//The partner namespace must be included as a prefix followed by _
mUserPermission.PermissionId = "SM_MathClass"
'//The Name value that will be displayed in the General Authorization Tree
mUserPermission.Name = "SM_MathClass"
'//The permission that this object can get
mUserPermission.Options = bou_FullReadNone
'//In case the level is one, there Is no need to set the FatherID parameter.
mUserPermission.Levels = 1
RetVal = UserPermission.Add
oCompany.GetLastError RetVal, ErrMsg
'//In case this permission object has a son permission object
Adding a PermissionTree - child object (Visual Basic)
[Visual Basic]
Dim RetVal As Long
Dim ErrCode As Long
Dim ErrMsg As String
Dim mUserPermission As SAPbobsCOM.UserPermissionTree
Set mUserPermission = oCompany.GetBusinessObject(oUserPermissionTree)
mUserPermission.PermissionId = "SM_MathClassSon"
mUserPermission.Name = "SM_MathClassExam"
mUserPermission.Options = bou_FullNone
'//For level 2 and up you must set the object's father unique ID
mUserPermission.Levels = 2
mUserPermission.FatherID = "SM_MathClass"
'//this object manages forms
mUserPermission.UserPermissionForm.FormType = "GL_MathClass"
RetVal = mUserPermission.Add
oCompany.GetLastError RetVal, ErrMsg
[Visual Basic]
Dim RetVal As Long
Dim ErrCode As Long
Dim ErrMsg As String
Dim mUser As SAPbobsCOM.Users
Set mUser = oCompany.GetBusinessObject(oUsers)
'//The user unique ID is 2
RetVal = mUser.GetByKey(2)
'//Setting a new sub object for the User that hold the user permission for the user permission object
mUser.UserPermission.PermissionId = "SM_MathClassSon"
'//Seting full permission for User 2 to manage SM_MathClassSon sub object
mUsers.UserPermission.Permission = boper_Full
RetVal = mUsers.Update
oCompany.GetLastError RetVal, ErrMsg
Setting user permission (Visual Basic) Copy Code
Dim RetVal As Long
Dim ErrCode As Long
Dim ErrMsg As String
Dim mUser As SAPbobsCOM.Users
Set mUser = oCompany.GetBusinessObject(oUsers)
'//The user unique ID is 2
RetVal = mUser.GetByKey(2)
'//Setting a new sub object for the User that hold the user permission for the user permission object
mUser.UserPermission.PermissionId = "SM_MathClassSon"
'//Seting full permission for User 2 to manage SM_MathClassSon sub object
mUsers.UserPermission.Permission = boper_Full
RetVal = mUsers.Update
oCompany.GetLastError RetVal, ErrMsg
Best Regards
Jane Jing
SAP Business One Forums team

In oracle rac, If user query a select query and in processing data is fetched but in the duration of fetching the particular node is evicted then how failover to another node internally?

In oracle rac, If user query a select query and in processing data is fetched but in the duration of fetching the particular node is evicted then how failover to another node internally?

The query is re-issued as a flashback query and the client process can continue to fetch from the cursor. This is described in the Net Services Administrators Guide, the section on Transparent Application Failover.

End user permission ignored

Hello,
I have a problem with an end user permission that seems to get ignored: I wanted to demonstrate the usage of the end user permission and assigned a role to a User (for simplicity's sake as an entry point, no worksets, pages etc. involved) and enabled end user permission on the role for that particular user.
Now when that user logs in he gets to see the according entry in the navigation bar as expected. However if I disable the end user permission, log out and again log in the user, he stills sees the link. The end user permission setting is simply ignored. Can someone shed light onto this, could there be something wrong with the installation)?
I don't think this is an issue of permission inheritance (the role permissions are set explicitly anyway) or overlapping permissions due to membership in several groups - the user is only member of the single standard group 'authenticated users'.
Regards,
Sebastian
P.S. What's the use of a role assignment to a user without end user permission anyway (I mean why the option)? What happens if you don't add permissions on a Role for a certain user at all (I tried it, but the effect is the same as described above - end user permission seem to be irrelevant)?

Hi Robert,
thanks for your answer and for the link (and I thought I had read everything). I am not so sure however if I really understand the term 'runtime environment' for a user. I thought runtime vs. design-time meant the difference between the content a user sees when he is actually using the portal and the content an administrator has access to in the portal content catalog, i.e. a meta-environment accessible only through certain tools like the permission editor or similar.
I don't understand what you want to express with "<i>It's used to restrict ... end user runtime environment</i>" and why the "Page Personalization" is an example.
I realize that for roles the availability for a user is solely defined by the assignment of that role to the user - end user permissions have no effect on this. Confusing, because I tought this availability (i.e. showing links in the toplevel or detailed navigation) was what was meant by 'runtime environment' but I seem to be wrong here.
The docu says "<i>for roles the end user permission setting does enable you to define which users/groups/roles are able to preview the role content using the portal design-time tools</i>". Again, I am confused, I thought this was exactly the meaning of design-time environment.
Great if you or someone else could comment on this..
Regards,
Sebastian

User permission to selected forms

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for