Using Content filters (HTML Filter)

Hello.
I'm having problem displaying an html-page in the portal with an url-iview. The problem is that the portal is accessed using HTTPS, and the url-iview links to a html-page using http.
This will generate a popup in internet explorer about unsecure content.
I thought that a way to solve this could be to connect KM to the page and then let the url-iview show the html-page throw the KM Repository.
This works fine, however there is still one problem.
Inside the HTML page, there is <IMG src> tags that reffers to the http site.
How can I configure HTML filters to rewrite all image and stylesheet references via KM instead of to the http-site?
I've tried to understand the documentation on Content Filters (http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/55/921d7bb0c611d5993800508b6b8b11/content.htm), but I don't know what to write in "Base Tag" property, or ir this even works.
Does anyone know if there is an example about this? Or perhaps know how to configure this?
Regards, Mikael

This can be done, but it might not be a optimal solution. You would basically parse each HTML file and replace the links before streaming the content. You can create your own version of com.sap.km.cm.docs component which streams the content of a HTML file by replacing the links. And you would use your own component for creating the KM doc iviews that way you will have altered HTML links.

Similar Messages

Possible to use list filters to filter library?

Hi-
We have a library of documents, and want to add XLS to how it displays for end users. However, doing so means we can't use column header filtering.
so, we tried to use List filters (as ugly as they are), but they will not allow us to connect to the web part showing the documents.
Has anyone been able to use OOB functionality to add one web part (EG, sharepoint list filters) to filter a document library display?
thanks.
Barbara Selden director, Business Readiness 110 Consulting

Hi Barbara,
As I understand, you want to use OOB functionality to add one web part (EG, sharepoint list filters) to filter a document library display.
Could you please provide the screenshot of the SharePoint list filter web part configuration?
You should make sure the SharePoint list filter web part and document library in the same page. When they are in the same page, you could build the connection between them.
Then you could edit the web part to choose the document library in the list section, view and value field. Then create the connection to the document library by clicking connection. You could click the drop-down arrow in the upper-right corner of the SharePoint
list filter Web Part, click Connections, click Get Filter Values From, and then select the custom list.
Then you could enable Server Rendering in the document library web part. You could edit the document library-> Miscellaneous > Enable Server Rendering.
After all you could filter the document library.
The article below is about how to connect a SharePoint List Filter Web Part to a Data View Web Part.
https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Connect-a-Filter-Web-Part-to-a-Data-View-Web-Part-bc10362e-afaa-42dc-b09e-ba8b1b83bb3c?CTT=5&origin=HA010033786&CorrelationId=6ed6821e-b67e-4adf-bd83-6ccc18441ec0&ui=en-US&rs=en-US&ad=US#bms5
Best regards,
Sara Fan
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Message filters vs Content Filters

Differences:
1. Message filters occur earlier in the email pipeline than content filters. Message filters before the email goes into the workqueue. The content filters occur inside the workqueue.
2. Message filters are currently only administered from the command line. Content filters can be administered from both the CLI and the GUI interface, however, the GUI interface is the recommended mehtod.
3. Content filters have an inbound and an outbound set of content filters, depending upon the direction of the message. That is, whether it's a relayed email (outgoing content filters) or inbound mail(inbound content filters). Message filters on the other hand, are autmoatically applied to both inbound and outgoing traffic, unless you lock it down to a specific listener. If you only have one listener, you may need to differentiate your flow of traffic by sendergroups or something else.
4. Message filters and content filters can pretty much have the same conditions and actions. However, message filters allow for if-else conditions, so they are more robust.
5. You can use message and content filters in unison. For example, use a message filter to insert a custom header that you content filter can key off of. However, this does not work the other way around. You cannot insert a custom header in the content filter and have the message filter key off of that info. Due to the way the email pipeline is set up, message filters come first, then content filters.
6. Easy of use: content filters are a bit more intuitive and user-friendly. message filters are more advanced, so it has a bigger learning curve.
7. Content filters used with customized incoming or outgoing mail policies allow you to splinter messages. Splintering messages allow you to split messages up by recipients. Message filters don't allow splintering and are applied to the entire message.
AsyncOS User Guide: Content Filters Overview
https://support.ironport.com/docs/c_series/4.6/HTML_4.6_Compilation/AsyncOS_4.6_User_Guide/AsyncOS_4.6_User_Guide-12-3.html
AsyncOS User Guide: Message Filters
https://support.ironport.com/docs/c_series/4.6/HTML_4.6_Compilation/AsyncOS_4.6_Adv_User_Guide/AsyncOS_4.6_Adv_User_Guide-09-2.html
AsyncOS User Guide: Email Pipeline
https://support.ironport.com/docs/c_series/4.6/HTML_4.6_Compilation/AsyncOS_4.6_User_Guide/AsyncOS_4.6_User_Guide-09-2.html

Actually, I just did a test on this and your point is half correct.
It's not the content filter that does the splintering, it's either the incoming or outgoing mail policy that does the splintering.
For example, if you only have one Default outgoing policy and an outgoing content filter that drops the mail if the destination is @yahoo.com.
If you sent in a test email with two recipients: [email protected] and [email protected]
Then the entire message would get dropped since there was only one Default outgoing policy.
However, you can allow for splintering if you had additional custom policies.
For example,
1. gmail-recipients
2. yahoo-recipients
3. Default policy
In that case, your test email would split into two separate emails and then you could have the content filters apply to each separately.
You are correct that message filters apply to the entire message and does not allow for message splintering.
However, content filtering, message splintering is only applicable if you have additional custom policy, either inbound or outgoing.
So, in additional to the requirement of mutliple recipients, you also need multiple policies, otherwise, have multiple recipients and only one Default policy will affect the entire message also.
Thanks for the attention to detail.
You've missed one of the biggest differences...
Message filters act on a _message_. Content filters act on a message/recipient pair.
If a message is only going to a single person then there's not any difference, but if a message is addresses to multiple people then the message filter will take the same action for all recipients, whilst the content filter will split ("splinter") the one message into multiple messages, with one (or possibly more) recipients each, and then act on each individually.

Ironport content filters w/headers

Hi
If I have a content filter acting on incoming mail which adds or edits a header, does this immediately affect the header, ie. can I immediately afterwards have an incoming filter which uses the header as a condition?
John

Hey John,
If you're using content filters where content filter #1 on the list adds/edits header
This takes action first
Then if you have a second content filter which looks for this added or edited header, then it'll take action if the header matches the condition of the filter.
However if your content filter #1 is taking action on a header that should be available but not yet added due to the ordering, you just need to reorder your filters.
Regards,
Matthew

Lack of iPhone content filtering

Why does Apple not allow (or provide) any advanced content filtering software on the iPhone/iPad? Simply turning off internet browsers and preventing App downloads is not a solution. I believe many people would use content filtering software/features if provided. The explicit video/image internet issues today are of epidemic proportions and I know many would agree with me on this. The iPhone is an excellent device, but if Apple does not come up (or allow) a rock solid solution soon, I may have to use an inferior product (which does provide/allow these things) just so my family and I can be protected. Who would be the right person to talk to in order to have my voice heard?

Settings > General > Restrictions.
There is an Explicit Language option.
Under Allowed Content, there is a Ratings option based on a selected country for Music & Podcasts, Movies, TV Shows, Books, and Apps.

IOS Content Filtering Using TrendMicro: Can I customize the block-page redirect-url?

I have IOS content filtering using the Trend Micro subscription service working on a 2911 running 15.1.(3)T3 with the security license option and a 30 day demo Trend subscription.
Once I figured out that the content filtering for Trend appears to be completely broken in 15.2 (even using docs for 15.2) I went back to 15.1 and it works great.
Everything seems great so far except I would like to have a more 'fancy' or custom blocked page where a user can have a couple links to either go to the trend micro reporting page http://global.sitesafety.trendmicro.com/result.php or some other page, and maybe some branding so they know the page is coming from our network and is not some fake security thing or phishing attempt or whatever.
I know I can use the 'parameter-map type urlfpolicy trend ' section to do a tiny bit of customization of the text that appears on the default blocked page display and there is an option for it to go to a simple redirect instead ('block-page redirect-url') but I wonder if anyone has any ideas on how to do more with either the built in page or the redirect-url to keep the information of what page the user was trying to access and why it was blocked (category etc.) while adding more features.
Thanks!
Oh, one last thing, this doesn't support any kind of 'user override' or anything like that does it? So that a network can have a filter applied but an admin could override the filtering to allow temporary access to something?

Hmm... no thoughts over the weekend. Anyone?

Trying to open a page in IE-tab using javascript, script type="text/javascript" window.location.href="chrome://coralietab/content/container.html?url=0,myurl" /script Error:Component returned failure code:0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE) [nsIDOMLocation.href]

I am trying to open a page in IE-tab using javascript like this, <script type="text/javascript"> window.location.href = "chrome://coralietab/content/container.html?url=0,myurl" ;</script>.Error occured : [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE) [nsIDOMLocation.href]" nsresult: "0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE)" location: "JS frame ::myurl :: load :: line 234" data: no] I have IE-Tab plug-in installed..when I open the same link manually in mozilla,it works fine and page gets opened in Ie-tab.

The only way this might be possible is by using the HostContainer object
to access the HTML page and do it from there.

How can I achieve IOS content filtering using a Cisco router

Good day Everybody.
I would like to set up content filtering using IOS on my Cisco router. I already know how to do URL filtering but I want to restrict access to sites based on categories.
Is this possible without having to introduce an external device?

Natively in IOS this is not possible. However you can configure CWS (Cisco Web Security). The router will forward web requests to a cloud based web security service.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps10142/ps11720/data_sheet_c78-729637.html

IOS web content filtering cannot get trend micro filter

hi, i just wondering how really i can get my router's content filtering connect to trps.trendmicro.com server again. previously it was success to get connect to the server, after i doing some changes on my zone-pair firewall then it cannot connect to the trend micro server anymore.
sh ip trm subscription status showing that i successfully connected and registerd
all the installation guide is doing accordingly,then i turn on my debug crypto pli validation and debug ip trm detail, all showing success connection to trendmicro site.
parameter-map type trend-global <param> are pointing to the trps.trendmicro.com, my class-map and policy-map didn't have any changes since last success connection.
zone-pair setting also attach with the right policy-map that serve for service-policy urlfilter <name>
overall, after my zone-pair firewall is UP again, then my web content filtering is gone, while registeration is made..
anyone have any idea what really happen?
thanks
Noel

Hi Yongkhang,
I think in order to figure out what is happening, we need to troubleshoot and see the config, data and other show commands. I'm not sure if you would feel comfortable posting that here. Therefore, i think its best to open up a case with tac on it so that it can be troubleshot to see why you cant access the trend micro server.
can you let me know what you mean by when you turn on your ZBF, your web content filtering is gone. Are you saying, when you turn on zbf, the web content filtering is no longer blocking or allowing sites?
have you ran the following debugs?
debug ip urlfilter detail
debug ip urlfilter event
debug ip url filter function-trace
also, what does this show:
show policy-map type inspect zone-pair urlfilter
Are you sure you have the class maps in the proper order since its processed sequentially..
regards,
scott

Junk characters display while using multipart with html content in Javamail

Hi All,
I have used Java mail API to send mail with attachment. To enable to attachment in mail and to do content formatting i have used multipart and html content type together.
My web application runs on apache tomcat 5.5 in MAC server. Java version is 1.5.
The Function which i have used for sending mail with attachment is as follows:
public void sendmailAttached(String to,String from,String host,boolean debug,String mailContent,String mailSubject,String cc,String attachFiles)
 String mailarray[]=to.split(";");
 Properties props = new Properties();
 //props.put("mail.smtp.port","425");
 props.setProperty("mail.smtp.host", host);
 if (debug) props.setProperty("mail.debug", ""+debug);
 Session session = Session.getInstance(props, null);
 session.setDebug(debug);
 try {
 Message msg = new MimeMessage(session);
 msg.setFrom(new InternetAddress(from));
 javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress[] toAddress=new javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress[mailarray.length];
 for (int i=0;i<mailarray.length ;i++ )
 toAddress=new javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress(mailarray[i]);
 msg.setRecipients(Message.RecipientType.TO, toAddress);
 msg.setSubject(mailSubject);
 try{
 String ccaray =cc;
 String mailarray1[]=ccaray.split(";");
 javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress[] CCAddress=new javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress[mailarray1.length];
 for (int i=0;i<mailarray1.length ;i++ )
 CCAddress[i]=new javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress(mailarray1[i]);
 msg.setRecipients(Message.RecipientType.CC,CCAddress);
 }catch(Exception ss)
 System.out.println("CC mail exception is ====>"+ ss.getMessage());
 msg.setSentDate(new java.util.Date());
 Multipart multipart = new MimeMultipart("related");
 BodyPart messageBodyPart = new MimeBodyPart();
 messageBodyPart.setContent(mailContent, "text/html");
 multipart.addBodyPart(messageBodyPart);
 String fileName = attachFiles.substring(attachFiles.lastIndexOf("/")+1,attachFiles.length());
 if(!fileName.equals(""))
 messageBodyPart = new MimeBodyPart();
 DataSource source = new FileDataSource(attachFiles);
 messageBodyPart.setDataHandler(new DataHandler(source));
 messageBodyPart.setFileName(fileName);
 multipart.addBodyPart(messageBodyPart);
 msg.setContent(multipart);
 Transport.send( msg );
 catch(MessagingException mex)
 Exception ex = mex;
 if (ex instanceof SendFailedException)
 SendFailedException sfex = (SendFailedException)ex;
Address[] invalid = sfex.getInvalidAddresses();
if (invalid != null) {
if (invalid != null) {
for (int i = 0; i < invalid.length; i++)
System.out.println("Invalid Addresss --------> " + invalid[i]);
try
 Message msg = new MimeMessage(session);
 msg.setFrom(new InternetAddress(from));
 Multipart multipart = new MimeMultipart("related");
 BodyPart messageBodyPart = new MimeBodyPart();
 messageBodyPart.setContent(mailContent, "text/html");
multipart.addBodyPart(messageBodyPart);
Address[] validUnsent = sfex.getValidUnsentAddresses();
javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress[] toAddress=new javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress[validUnsent.length];
if (validUnsent != null) {
for (int i = 0; i < validUnsent.length; i++)
System.out.println("Valid Address ------>"+validUnsent[i]);
String test = validUnsent[i]+"";
toAddress[i]=new javax.mail.internet.InternetAddress(test);
msg.setRecipients(Message.RecipientType.TO, toAddress);
msg.setSubject(mailSubject);
String fileName = attachFiles.substring(attachFiles.lastIndexOf("/")+1,attachFiles.length());
 if(!fileName.equals(""))
 messageBodyPart = new MimeBodyPart();
 DataSource source = new FileDataSource(attachFiles);
 messageBodyPart.setDataHandler(new DataHandler(source));
 messageBodyPart.setFileName(fileName);
 multipart.addBodyPart(messageBodyPart);
msg.setContent(multipart);
Transport.send( msg );
catch(Exception e)
 System.out.println("Mail Not Send");
 else
 System.out.println("Mail Server Not Connectd ");
This code is working properly and i am able to send mail with attachment and html formatted content without any problem. But console of server is filled up with too much junk characters because of which the catalina.out file of tomcat server is becoming fully filled.
Sample cosnole display with junk characters are as follows:
Subject: HBSP - DRUCKER - QC - CH16 - QC R2 Completed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related;
 boundary="----=_Part_34_15681668.1247471518887"
------=_Part_34_15681668.1247471518887
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi, Chapter CH16 in the project DRUCKER is Completed . Comments : Qc Accepted. Thanks, ANTONY.
------=_Part_34_15681668.1247471518887
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=9420317_CH06_p084-119.pdf.zip
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=9420317_CH06_p084-119.pdf.zip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 this display of junk characters are filling up multiple pages of console file.
Can any one suggest me how to overcome this problem?
Many thanks in advance.

There is no "sendmail" method in the JavaMail API.
The debug flag is set using the Session.setDebug method, or by setting the Session property "mail.debug".
If you're using someone else's helper classes with JavaMail, they may provide another way to set it.

Every time l open filters and try to use the oil painting filter photoshop closes down !!

Every time l open filters and try to use the oil painting filter photoshop closes down !!

Update your graphics driver. The oil paint filter uses GPU acceleration.
Mylenium

Web Content Filtering / Virus Scanning appliance

Hello all,
I'm in the market for a content / url / virus scanning device for our network. We are currently using MXLogic's Web Defense service and while it's very cheap it is not suiting our needs. What I'm looking for is an appliance that will do content filtering but also virus / malware / spyware scanning on web traffic. I'd also need to be able to setup policies / groups for different set's of users. For instance the folks who purchase the products we sell need to be able to see our vendors media (streaming video) content while our sales folks don't. I can't currently do this with MXLogic, it's all or nothing.
Our firewall is an ASA5510 and I've looked at the Content Security SSM-10 module with the plus license and while the pricing is definitely attractive I have a few questions about it. Does it integrate with MS Active Directory? In other words and it filter based on groups and policies or is it more IP / ACL based? Also does it perform well?
I've also looked at the IronPort product cisco sell's and have similar questions regarding that mainly what are folks experience with it, is it something you would recommend?

Hi Allen,
To answer your questions related to the CSC module:
1. No, the CSC module does not integrate with Active Directory. This is something that Trend Micro has in the works, but as of now there is no ETA for this functionality.
2. The CSC module will perform fairly well if used in the environment it was designed for. I would recommend taking a look at the CSC sizing guide to see if the CSC-SSM-10 would be something that is scalable enough for your network:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps6032/ps6094/ps6120/prod_white_paper0900aecd805c3cd6.html
I cannot speak to the performance/functionality of IronPort as I have not used it personally, but I have heard good things. Also, external appliances from Websense seem to be a popular choice when you need a product that is a bit more scalable or granular than what the CSC module can provide.
Hope that helps.
-Mike

Content filtering solutions for BorderManager

We're considering implementing a content filtering solution with our
BorderManager proxy server. What products are available for
BorderManager 3.9, and what do you recommend we use?

First thought on the Marshal8e6 appliance.
So far, I like this solution. We run it in invisible mode and it sends blocks based on profiles we can create. I have not setup the LDAP integration yet so I can not say more about how that is going to work but so far so good.
I am having an issue where I can not get updates to run to the box currently. I have a filter exception that is setup as follows:
Source Int: Any
Dest Int: Public
Packet type : any IP stateful
Source host: 8e6 appliance
Dest Network: range of update addresses (secureupdate.8e6.com)
and it will not update.
This is the error when SSH tries to run from the appliance:
HTTP/1.0 302 Moved Temporarily
Content-Length: 217
Connection: Close
Content-type: text/html
Location:
https://192.168.102.253:444/BM-Login...253:1959/data/
bmaok.htm%22
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Novell BorderManager</TITLE><BODY>The document has
moved <A
HREF="https://192.168.102.253:444/BM-Login/?%22http://192.168.102.253:1959
/data/bmaok.htm%22">here</A></HEAD><BODY></BODY></HTML>
read:errno=0
The 192.168.102 address is from one of our DMZs, so it is strange that this is where BM is trying to authenticate... but why??
Any ideas greatly appreciated.
Steve D.

Is there a list of what 4G devices support content filtering

Long story short, I am due for a device upgrade in a few months. I have been happy with Verizon's coverage, but have been using a 3G phone for the past few months because I need the content filtering on it. Such content filtering does not appear to be available on the Razr M that I was using. From what I've been able to find out, content filtering is only available on 4G on certain phones. I'm ok with that. I can't seem to find a list of what models content filtering is available on and what models it isn't.
Content filtering is a service I absolutely need. I've been happy with Verizon's coverage and service, but I can't keep using a 3G phone forever and would like to move to 4G for obvious reasons so I need to find a phone that will work with content filtering on Verizon which is why I'm looking for a list of models that support content filtering. If I can't find a 4G model that supports content filtering I may have to switch providers. I really hate to do this for obvious reasons, but this is a service that is vital to me.

It would seem this web site will answer your question.
https://m-support.verizonwireless.com/support/terms/products/content_filtering.html
It makes note of Blackberry devices not compatable see note:
The service does not work on most Push To Talk devices, any device with a static Internet Protocol address or on search results provided through the Get It Now Search application. The Internet filtering capabilities of the service do not work on phones using WiFi, Mobile Web 1.0, BlackBerry devices or on devices that use Venturi Compression Software, including phones tethered to PCs or PC cards, unless the compression software is turned off. Internet filtering will not work on most advanced devices until you have turned the device off and back on after every Content Filter setting change. The music filtering capabilities of the service do not work on phones with Verizon Music v1.0 software. Call 800-922-0204 or 611 from your handset if you are on a corporate calling plan to determine eligibility to use the service and to activate the service.
Good Luck

High Amount of Spam on Exchange 2013 - Content Filtering is Enabled but Pfizer Spam Filling Up Everyone's Mailboxes

Hello
Previously I used Exchange 2010 with Forefront Threat Protection installed and this used to do a good job of stopping all the spam.
However since updating to Exchange 2013 earlier this year and enabling the integrated spam filtering everyone noticed a sudden increase in the amount of spam which was getting through which has been bad for a long time.
We have been living with it but in the last 3 weeks everyone has started getting about 40 emails a day from Pfizer for Viagra. All these seem to defeat the content filtering as Viagra is spelt with an extra I and the email address is always different.
Also images in emails are blocked by default but somehow all the images on these spam messages appear for everyone.
I am not sure the spam filtering is working at all and I'm not sure how to tell as ForeFront gives you a nice graphical dashboard but I can find nothing similar to this in Exchange and PowerShell seems the only way to configure the limited functionality
of the content filter.
Is there any way to get rid of these messages as it doesn't look very good when they are constantly popping up for everyone?
Thanks
Robin
Robin Wilson

Hello ManU
Thanks for the reply.
I have checked the logs and see this quite often:
AcceptMessage,,SCL,not available: policy is disabled
But other times it says this:
RejectMessage,550 5.7.1 Message rejected as spam by Content Filtering
Which seems to indicate it is rejecting some.
This is what one of the email headers look like:
Received: from RWS-MAIL.rwsservices.net (192.168.2.151) by
RWS-MAIL.rwsservices.net (192.168.2.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id
15.0.775.38 via Mailbox Transport; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 10:59:26 +0000
Received: from RWS-MAIL.rwsservices.net (192.168.2.151) by
rws-mail.rwsservices.net (192.168.2.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id
15.0.775.38; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 10:58:38 +0000
Received: from [90.169.106.204] (90.169.106.204) by mail.rwsservices.net
(192.168.2.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.775.38 via Frontend
Transport; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 10:58:37 +0000
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 12:05:58 +0200
From: US.Pfizer eStore <[email protected]>
To: robin.wilson <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Subject: Dear robin.wilson up to 65% OFF!
X-Mailer: Airmail (223)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="dd2ee3ea_586bb9e4_6f04"
Return-Path: [email protected]
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: 001-taxis.co.uk
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Neutral
Received-SPF: Neutral (rws-mail.rwsservices.net: 90.169.106.204 is neither
permitted nor denied by domain of [email protected])
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Network-Message-Id: e8825204-1f32-48be-a331-08d0d1d30209
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: 1
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PCL: 2
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Antispam-Report: DV:3.3.13223.464;SID:SenderIDStatus Neutral;OrigIP:90.169.106.204
X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 079171ba-394f-46d5-a160-56e416712e8e
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AVStamp-Enterprise: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: rws-mail.rwsservices.net
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous
The emails use a different sender email address every time and there is always a poem in very light grey writing in the body of the email. The drugs are always misspelt as well. Is this why these are getting through?
Thanks
Robin
Robin Wilson

Using Content filters (HTML Filter)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for