Using Dimension as a fact
I have a scenario:
let me create that with simple Prod/Cus/Ord tables so that everyone can understand (instead of using my business terms).
Product table:
prod id
prod name
Staff table:
staff id
staff name
Customer Table:
cust no
customer name
staff id ---> This is the staff who created this customer or assisted this customer (before placing an order) (joined to staff table by staf id)
Order Fact table:
prod id --> Joined to Products table by prod id
cust no --> Joined to customer table by cust no
staff id --> Joined to staff table by staff id
ord no
ord date
qty
amount
I am joining staff id to customer (instead of going thorugh Order fact table) as a customer is created by one staff but actual order is created by another staff. So, my clients would need to who know created the customer and who created his orders.
My question is, is this a proper design? because with this design tools are not able to understand how to formulate a query. Cognos query studio just takes which ever path it likes (not sure if there is a way to change that) and BO creates a loop and looks for Contexts (our customers don't like context as these scenarios are plenty in our database)
another eg:-
there could be dates that is common in both Customer and Order fact tables:
customer created date,modified date and order created date, order modified date. analysts would need to know customer created date/order modified date etc..
Hope you understood my question..
Thanks,.
Firstly, you need to look at why your customers don't like contexts. They are one of the best parts of universe design. How else do they expect you to avoid chasm traps, with a separate universe for each fact table? Believe me, I've heard about some poor universe designers doing this because they didn't understand contexts!
However, what you have here sounds like a candidate for aliases.
This is because you have two different uses for the staff table:
1/ Staff create orders
2/ Staff create customers
So, create one alias of staff as a_cust_create_staff (the a_ to denote that it's an alias) and one as a_order_taker_staff
Join a_cust_create_staff to customer and join a_order_taker_staff to the order fact table.
You will now need to create two different objects for the staff to reflect their two different roles.
Same applies with your dates. Create aliases for each use of date - if you use just one date table you will only get rows back where the order is created and modified on the same date that a customer is created and modified!
If you only have one fact table then you don't need to use contexts - if none are defined it assumes that all joins can be used together. If you have more than one fact and all your joins are one-to-many, then you can choose to detect contexts and accept the suggested contexts.
Regards,
Mark
Similar Messages
-
Use dimension from detail fact to find related records in summary fact
I have a cube with 2 facts and 2 dimensions.
What I want to accomplish is if I filter by a "Line Item Date" that it shows me the related total cost without having to show the invoice date.
How should I design my dimensions or cube to get this to work? (dim example below)
Dim_DateLineItem
lineItemDate
Fact_LineItems
lineItemDate
InvoiceDate
price
Dim_DateInvoices
InvoiceDate
Fact_invoices
invoiceDate
TotalCostTry to insert a record in dim table with row_wid=0 this record 0 for number type and Unspecified for string type columns
in rpd use ifnull(col,0)
~ http://cool-bi.com -
Logical column - Fact measure using Dimension value
Hello all, I have a Fact table that has a metric (Value) where I have set the Aggregation rule to Sum. Now I'd like to create a metric based on the value of a Product Dimension that joins to this Fact table. So I create logical column that has the syntax - Case When Product_Desc = 'A' then Value else 0 End.
The issue is in Answers when I bring this new metric in it doesn't bring in the correct value, are there steps I am missing with creating this metric?
My assumption is if I just bring that new metric in by itself it would return one record - A sum of the Value where the Product = 'A'.
Thank youHi BRizzle,
In your scenario, you creatre a calculated measure using the employee dimension, and then this measure show "#VALUE" on the pivot table, right? It seems that it's a limitation of using calculated measures in SQL Server Analysis. Calculated measures cannot
be secured using Dimension Security in a straight forward manner, in fact they won't be listed at all in the Dimension tab of the role where we define the Dimension security. When such measures are browsed in client tools like Excel, the value that would be
displayed is an error value like #VALUE. For the detail information about it, please see:
Limitations / Disadvantages of using Calculated Measures / Calculated Members in SSAS
Regards,
Charlie Liao
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.
Charlie Liao
TechNet Community Support -
Using Dimension Measures - COUNT, etc.. within Fact Results
All,
I am running into an issue that I imagine is relatively straight forward if you know what youre doing but I cant seem to get it right. I am trying to include some counts from my Dimensions alongside measures from my fact table.
To do this I have setup my Dimensions as Facts that I require counts from. In a simple example I have:
EVENT_FACT
Timestamp
User Id
Building Id
Event Type
existing measure = Event Count
USER_BUILDING_DIM
User Id
Building Id
Building Type
USER_BUILDER_DIM contains a record for each user and the building they are contained in along with a type. Users can exist in multiple buildings so this table's key is User Id and Building Id.
When I run a query from the FACT table I want to show the total number of Distinct Users in that build next to each result. To make this work I have done the following:
1. Setup the USER_BUILDING_DIM as a fact in my BMM, the only table that joins to this Fact table is the USER_BUILDING_DIM itself
2. In the USER_BUILDING_DIM (DIMENSION) hierarchy I have 3 levels, total, building and user ... I want my count of all users for each building
3. Created a measure called User Count - Distinct in the USER_BUILDING_DIM (FACT) table and set it to the Building level in the USER_BUILDING_DIM (DIMENSION) hierarchy. That is the only level I set for this measure
When I go into answers and I create a query like:
Building Id, Event Count, User Count - Distinct
The query comes back perfect and shows me for each building the total event count from the EVENT_FACT table and then alongside it the Distinct User count for users in that building counted from the USER_BUILDING_DIM table.
The Issue occurs when I add any other dimensions into the request that hang off of the EVENT_FACT table, such as Month from my Time Dimension which also hangs off of the EVENT_FACT table:
Month, Event Count, User Count - Distinct
Now, for the query above the User Count - Distinct value returns nothing and when I look in the logs Answers is not even performing a count anymore and instead is just joining the USER_BUILDING_DIM to the EVENT_FACT table and TIME Dimension
Any thoughts .. thanks in advance
KHi,
You are getting no results in "User Count Distinct" when you also drag "Month" because "USER_BUILDING_DIM_FACT" doesn't join to the Time Dimension.
This Fact doesn't have any Time information so it's not possible to obtain the "USER_BUILDING_DIM_FACT"."User Count Distinct" measure with Time Dimension columns.
You are trying to count users by Month but you don't have this information in your model. You can only count users by month which have events associated to it.
Regards -
Dimension table and fact table exists data physically
Hi experts,
can anyone plz tell me weather dimension table and fact table exists data physically or not/Hi..Sudheer
SAPu2019s BW is based on "Enhanced Star schema" or "Info Cubes" database design.This database design has a central database table, known as u2018Fact Tableu2019 which is surrounded by associated dimension tables.
Fact table is surrounded by dimensional tables. Fact table is usually very large, that means it contains
millions to billions of records.
These dimension tables doesn't contain data it contain references to the pointer tables that point to the master data tables which in turn contain Master data objects such as customer, material and destination country stored in BW as Info objects. An InfoObjects can contain single field definitions such as transaction data or complex Customer Master Data that hold attributes, hierarchy and customer texts that are stored in their own tables.
SID is surrogate ID generated by the system. The SID tables are created when we create a master data IO. In SAP BW star schema, the distinction is made between two self contained areas: Infocube & master data tables/SID tables.
The master data doesn't reside in the satr schema but resides in separate tables which are shared across all the star schemas in SAP BW. A numer ID is generated which connects the dimension tables of the infocube to that of the master data tables.
The dimension tables contain the dim ID and SID of a particular IO. Using this SID the attributes and texts of an master data Io is accessed.
The SID table is connected to the associated master data tables via teh char key.
Fact table(Transaction data,DIM ID)<>Dimention Table(SID and Dim ID)<->Masterdata table(SID,IO)
Thanks,
Abha -
How do I reuse my Date dimension in every fact and dimension that has dates?
Hi, all,
I have a fact table in the middle of a star and three dimensions. Each of the four objects has a modified date in it. Is there a way for me to create and reuse a Date dimension for every one of the three dimensions and one fact? I want
to be able to slice data by ModifiedDate from D1, ModifiedDate from D2, ModifiedDate from D3, and ModifiedDate from F1 at the same time because I have a very custom date roll-up by which I want to see the data.
I suppose I can re-instance the Date table in the DSV 4 times, but I wanted to know if I can resolve this via a separate Date dimension. Thanks!Hi,
If say you want to slice the cube on modified date from all dimension D1, D2 and D3 using a single attribute, then try if the following works
create a new date attribute lets say [Slice Date] in Date dimension and later use MDX scope statement somewhat like this
Scope([Date Dim].[Slice Date].CurrentMember);
this = (strtomember('[D1 Dim].[Modified Date]'+right([Date Dim].[Slice Date].CurrentMember.uniquename,len([Date Dim].[Slice Date].CurrentMember.uniquename)-23)),
strtomember('[D2 Dim].[Modified Date]'+right([Date Dim].[Slice Date].CurrentMember.uniquename,len([Date Dim].[Slice Date].CurrentMember.uniquename)-23)),
strtomember('[D3 Dim].[Modified Date]'+right([Date Dim].[Slice Date].CurrentMember.uniquename,len([Date Dim].[Slice Date].CurrentMember.uniquename)-23))
end scope;
Saurabh Kamath -
3 confirmed Dimensions and 2 fact tables
Hi experts,
how can we connect 3 confirmed Dimensions and 2 fact tables without loops and traps please give me a solutionHi,
Dimensions Tables : Dimension tables are typically small, ranging from a few to several thousand rows. Occasionally dimensions can grow fairly large, however. For example, a large credit card company could have a customer dimension with millions of rows. Dimension table structure is typically very lean, for example customer dimension could look like following:
Customer_key
Customer_full_name
Customer_city
Customer_state
Customer_country
Fact Tables :a fact table consists of the measurements, metrics or facts of a business process. It is often located at the centre of a star schema or a snowflake schema, surrounded by dimension tables.
Fact tables contain keys to dimension tables as well as measurable facts that data analysts would want to examine. For example, a store selling automotive parts might have a fact table recording a sale of each item. The fact table of an educational entity could track credit hours awarded to students. A bakery could have a fact table that records manufacturing of various baked goods.
Context Versus Alias Overview :
http://www.dagira.com/2009/07/22/context-versus-alias-overview/
How to create context :
http://www.bidw.org/business-objects/universe-design/understanding-context-and-its-use-in-business-objects-universe/
You can also look on the eFashion universe for more information.
Thanks,
Amit -
Built a report using two dimensons & two fact
Hi Experts,
We have a requirement where we need to built a report using two dimensons & two
fact i.e. the report contains columns for all the two dims & both the facts.
the structure is as follows.
1)we have two dimensions
as REGION_BRANCH (containing region & barnch information) and
PRODUCT_group(containing the product group info).
2)Two fact as WORKING_CAPITAL_DAYS & WORKING_CAPITAL_BUDGET.
FOLLOWING are the join conditions.
1)The Dim table REGION_BRANCH has joins with fact tabel WORKING_CAPITAL_DAYS as
REGION_BRANCH.REG_CD=WORKING_CAPITAL_DAYS.REG_CD
REGION_BRANCH.BR_CD=WORKING_CAPITAL_DAYS.BR_CD
2)the 2nd DIM table PRODUCT_group has joins with fact table WORKING_CAPITAL_DAYS as
PRODUCT_group.PG_CD=WORKING_CAPITAL_DAYS.PG_CD
3) The Dim table REGION_BRANCH has joins with the 2nd fact tabel WORKING_CAPITAL_BUDGET as
REGION_BRANCH.BR_CD=WORKING_CAPITAL_BUDGET.BR_CD
4)the 2nd DIM table PRODUCT_group has joins with fact table the 2nd fact tabel WORKING_CAPITAL_BUDGET as
PRODUCT_group.PG_CD=WORKING_CAPITAL_BUDGET.PG_CD
Now the requirement is as follows.
1)we need to build a report in OBI where we will have
REGION & BARNCH from REGION_BRANCH Dim table,
PRODUCT from Product Group dim table,
INV_ACTUAL_DAYS from WORKING_CAPITAL_DAYS (1ST fact TABLE)table.
INV_DAYS FROM WORKING_CAPITAL_BUDGET (2ND FACT TABLE) TABEL.
the issue is when we try to build the report..the OBIE answers gives an error as
[nQSError: 15018] Incorrectly defined logical table source
[NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 15018] Incorrectly defined logical table source (for fact table WORKING_CAPITAL_DAYS) does not contain mapping for [WORKING_CAPITAL_BUDGET.INV_DAYS]. (HY000).
How can we built a report using two FACT tables.
Regrds,hi,
Create a dimension hierarchy for the dim tables and set the content level to fact tables.....
So that BI Server will identify at what level the facts are joined to dimension table
try this it should work
thanks,
saichand -
Relationship between Dimension without linking Fact table
Hi,
My question is like I have five dimensions connected to a fact table through primary - foreign key(Composite Key) relationship. Will this referential integrity help if I want some information between two dimension which are not linked directly and I am not
including any measures from fact table .
Example: Suppose I have customer, Product and Manufacturer Dimensions all linked to a fact table but not linked to each other directly but can I get right result when I want to know what are the manufacturer for each product? or list of
customers using a particular product. Will the referential integrity work ? since they all are related in fact table.
regards
Sanjoy ghoshHi Sanjoy -
The answer to your questions depends on your dimensional design and exactly what the fact table represents. Fact tables naturally capture the intersection of the different dimensions. This is true whether you physically implement a
PK - FK relationship in the relational db.
In your case, since customer is involved, sounds like a sales transaction fact. If that's true, you can easily join from customer, through the fact, to the product dimension, to get the list of customers that purchased a particular product.
For the manufacturer for each product, a sales transaction fact will not necessarily answer this question completely. Particularly in the case of products that have no sales for a given period, and thus, don't have any fact records to join from manufacturer
across to product. If you need to solve this question, you have some other options:
- flatten the Manufacturer directly into the Product dimension as attribute of the product (probably the simplest approach and allows you to remove a key from the fact)
- embed the Manufacturer key directly in the Product dimension (if you need the Manufacturer dimension separate for use with other events / facts and more detailed dimensionality - i.e., detailed attributes about the Manufacturer that wouldn't need
to be flattened onto the product)
- build a factless fact that captures the products offered by a given manufacturer at a given point in time (perhaps representing various products catalogs and associated dates. This would allow you to capture rich details about each dimension separately
and use the factless fact to record)
Let me know if that helps.
Brent Greenwood, MS, MCITP, CBIP
// Please mark correct answers and helpful posts //
http://brentgreenwood.blogspot.com -
BPC : Using Dimension Property in Formula of a Conversion File
Hi,
I want to export data using Package Export from Fact Table. I have transformation and conversion files.
I want to use the property of a dimension in Formula Column of a Conversion file.
I want to lookup the property and based on property I want to either skip record or have internal value.
I am looking for something like follows..
=iif([%external%].TYPE = WBS,*SKIP,D2113)
So if my Dimension 's TYPE property is WBS , I would like to skip that record else I want the value from fourth column.
I am running the Export from Fact Table with various combinations in formula column , but it is only returning null in the export file.
Please let me know how I can make this work.
Thanks,
SanjaySadi,
You can write if Statement in transformation not conversion.
Look at this docs,
How to Import Master Data and Hierarchies into SAP BusinessObjects BPC 7.5 from SAP NetWeaver BW
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c02d0b47-3e54-2d10-0eb7-d722b633b72e?QuickLink=index&…
Thanks -
Why OBIEE always joins all dimensions to the fact?
We have a fact table, which joins 10 dimensions. I have a report that gets data from the fact and only one dimension. However, when i see the physical sql, i see that OBIEE joins all dimensions to the fact, even if I am not selecting any information fro the dimension. Is there any setting to avoid this? eg Fact1, dim1, dim2, dim3. The report has data from fact1 and dim1, but the actual sql joins fact1 with dim1, dim2 and dim3 even if I am not selecting any information from dim2 and dim3 in the report
We do use star model at physical and logical layer. I wonder what change I need to make to avoid this. The fact should not always join all dimensions.
-
Error in WEBI report and MDXTEST when using Dimensions in Prompt
Hi,
I am using BOXIR3.1 SP2, SAPBI 7.0
I m creating a webI report (Universe is on SAP BI Query.) which include following objcets in Query section of WebI pannel:
Business partner, Account Class, Total Arreas count.
The Condition pane of Webi Includes Prompt on object "Account Class".
When I run a report, I get List of values for Dimension Account Class, when I select one of available value eg: Commercial Customer,I get Following Error.
A database error occured. The database error text is: The MDX query SELECT { [Measures].[4EITIDWAFWLLZD2ONIAVCKD56] } ON COLUMNS , NON EMPTY CROSSJOIN( [Z_BPATNER].[LEVEL01].MEMBERS, { [Z_FCACTBP__0UCACC_CLAS].[Commercial Customers] } ) ON ROWS FROM [ZFC_M07/Z_FC_M07_Q002] failed to execute with the error Value Commercial Customers for characteristic Z_FCACTBP__0UCACC_CLAS unknown. (WIS 10901)
I tried running same query in MDXTEST editor of BI. I got same error!!!
Then I tried changing the MDX Query as:
SELECT { [Measures].[4EITIDWAFWLLZD2ONIAVCKD56] }
ON COLUMNS , NON EMPTY CROSSJOIN( [Z_BPATNER].[LEVEL01].MEMBERS, { [Z_FCACTBP__0UCACC_CLAS].[COM] } ) ON ROWS
FROM [ZFC_M07/Z_FC_M07_Q002]
Then it worked Fine!!! If you observe the change is in the value of Prompt Account Class [Z_FCACTBP__0UCACC_CLAS].[COM]
By default Dimension object in Universe shows text value, but when I changed the MDXQuery with Key value (This is one of the value of value is for [Z_FCACTBP__0UCACC_CLAS].[Level01] object in mDX test Editor.) It works fine.
I wonder How do i solve this problem!! List of values available in dimension cannot be changed at universe level.
Please let me know if any solution for this exists.
regads,
Nisha.Hi Ingo,
I am creating the prompt on the dimension "Account Class" at WebI level.
The Technical name of this object is: [Z_FCACTBP__0UCACC_CLAS].[LEVEL01]
Also,
I confirmed that Index Awareness is applied on this dimension as [Z_FCACTBP__0UCACC_CLAS].[LEVEL01].[TECH_NAME].
This Dimension has detail object called "Account Class (Key) "and "Account Class (Medium name)".
MDXtest editor in SAP, shows me text as well as [ Level01] values:
Eg: Account Class InfoObject has values "Commercial Customer " (This is text value)and "[Z_FCACTBP__0UCACC_CLAS].[COM]".
COM Refers to Commercial Customer .
So In WebI when I use Dimension "Account Class" as prompt, I get Text value of this InfoObject which is "Commercial Customer ".
and MDXQuery Fails. But when I modify this query in mDXTEST Editor with value as "[Z_FCACTBP__0UCACC_CLAS].[COM]", It work fine.
I donu2019t understand the reason, since this problem is with almost 90% of Dimension object.
When I delete this object from universe, and refresh the universe then webI works fine.
But, if for some reason I refresh the universe again, the Dimension object as a prompt doesnu2019t work!!!
This error occurs every time I refresh the universe.
We are in UAT phase and soon to go Live!! We cannot afford to delete the object every time I refresh the universe.
Please let me know your inputs.
regards,
Nisha.
Edited by: Nisha Makhija on Oct 15, 2009 4:56 PM -
Summary Report with 4 Dimensions and 5 Facts
Hello OBIEE Czars:
I have a problem.
I am trying to make a summary report with 4 Dimensions and 5 Facts.
Out of that only 2 Dimensions are Confirmed.
Now when I try to bring in all the facts, I get view display error.
I searched forum for similar issues.
So I have tried following so far.
1) Add other dimensions as source and set level to Total for those dims.
- After doing this, I dont get view display error, but I get blank rows for couple of facts.
2) I am already aggregating all the measures.
Please help me out.
This forum has been very helpful so far.
Thanks.
~VinayHi
This method seems fine until you run a request that includes a filter on an unconformed dimension.
The SQL itself should be quite straightforward (see below) but the BI Server instance does not seem to be joining this data correctly after posting the 2 separate queries to the database.
SELECT
x.dim1, x.dim2
x.fact1_agg_measure
y.fact2_agg_measure
FROM
SELECT
dim1, dim2
SUM(fact1.measure) fact1_agg_measure
FROM
dim1,
dim2, --UNCONFORMED+
fact1
WHERE
.... .... join fact1 to dimensions as normal
AND dim2 = 'BUSINESS_IDENTFIER'
GROUP BY
dim1, dim2
) x,
SELECT
dim1
SUM(fact2.measure) fact2_agg_measure
FROM
dim1,
fact2
WHERE
.... .... join fact2 to dimensions as normal
GROUP BY
dim1
) y
WHERE
x.dim1 = y.dim1
The result set returned in Answers is firstly a correctly aggregated record plus ALL rows from the second query above ??
Just wondering if anyone else has come across this issue?
cheers
Tony -
Execution of a planning function with the used dimension values in a crosstab
Hello,
would like to execute planning functions within Design Studio but I don't really know how I combine this execution with the used dimension values in a crosstab for the .
Here the requirement:
3 Planning functions which should use the same filter (all values of all dimensions in the crosstab) and which should run one after another:
// open data slice
PF_1.execute();
// generate combinitions
PF_2.execute();
// close data slice
PF_3.execute();
Many thanks in advance.
Kind regards,
TobiasHi Arun,
in general it is not possible to nest planning functions. The inner function would update the data in the plan buffer without the outer function knowing about it. Also the inner function might be on a different aggregation level which would make things very tricky.
Alternatively you can include ABAP logic into a FOX formula:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/47/94eb78b6394befe10000000a42189d/frameset.htm
Or just create the complete logic in one ABAP planning function type.
Regards,
Marc
SAP NetWeaver RIG -
Using Dimension Formulas to sum data based on different criteria
Hi all,
I am trying to use a u201CDimension Formulau201D to perform the following calculation:
We have an account dimension which has 2 important properties:
1. CRITERIUMTYPE: This property can have 3 different values: u201CWERKu201D, u201CINVu201D OR u201CLIQu201D
2. ACCTYPE: This property can have 2 different values: u201CEXPu201D or u201CINCu201D
The client wants to have a report that sums data based on these 2 properties. An example will help to clarify this:
ACCOUNTS CRITERIUMTYPE ACCTYPE VALUE
ACCOUNT A WERK EXP 100 u20AC
ACCOUNT B WERK INC 150 u20AC
ACCOUNT C WERK EXP 200 u20AC
ACCOUNT D WERK INC 300 u20AC
ACCOUNT E INV EXP 50 u20AC
ACCOUNT F INV INC 100 u20AC
ACCOUNT G INV EXP 200 u20AC
ACCOUNT H INV INC 500 u20AC
The clients wishes to see this data in the following way:
CRITERIUMTYPE ACCTYPE VALUE
WERK EXP 300 u20AC
INC 450 u20AC
INV EXP 250 u20AC
INC 600 u20AC
In order to achieve this I have created several new accounts, one for each combination e.g.: Account WERKEXP is used to sum the data on the combination CRITERIUMTYPE=WERK and ACCTYPE=EXP. I have created a dimension formula in my account dimension but this is where I am stuck. I have created the following formula to calculate the account WERKEXP:
IIF([BUDGETPOSITIE].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("ACCTYPE")="EXP",IIF([BUDGETPOSITIE].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("CRITERIUMTYPE")="WERK",[BUDGETPOSITIE].CURRENTMEMBER,0),0)
The problem with this formula is the following:
The formula will add all amounts that meet the 2 criteria mentioned in the formula, EXP and WERK, but as soon as it finds an accounts that does not match the 2 criteria it will set the account WERKEXP back to 0. I need to know if there is a way, using dimension formulas, of adding these values together without the new account being set to 0 as soon as one of the accounts it needs to check does not meet 1 of the 2 criteria.
We are working on SAP BPC 7.5 for NW with SP04
All help is very much appreciated!
Kind regards,
StefanoHi,
You can also use ParentHn property to have different grouping of accounts within the dimension.
So in your case rather using the member formula you can have four accounts and add them in the Parenthn property for grouping it.
1. The Solution proposed by Nilanjan is specific for a Report/IS and Performance will be good
2. My solution will be global something similar to MDX formula, but performance may be slightly lesser than using excel function.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
G.Vijaya Kumar
Maybe you are looking for
-
So my two daughters (aged 7 & 9) each received an iPad for Christmas. They are interested in the same games and I installed them on their device. Because I registered both of their iPads on my iTunes account, when play these games they are "me". I
-
Can't get my iTunes gift card to work.
Hey I can't get my iTunes Gift card to work I got the first part right but when I need the serial number it wouldn't work I entered it right everytime but still wouldn't work so I got out of the page and started again and I entered the Activate Numbe
-
Wish List for AutoUpdate function
I'm not sure if this belongs in this board but I can't seem to find a good place to gripe ... if this is the wrong place then my apologies. I'm old and somewhat computer challenged and I like the auto-update feature, but I wish that Creative would ch
-
Change Logs in Rebate Recipient Data
Good Morning! Do you have a TCode or a report detailing the change logs in the Rebate Recipient data? Thanks in advance!
-
Hi, <p> I have configured an LDAP Authenticator for an external LDAP directory in the security realm of the samples portal. User Management is working, but when I try to access the Group Management for the LDAP Authenticator I get the following error