Using ports of the same network interface

Hi,
I'm an Oracle DBA.
I will perform 2 installations of Oracle Management Agent on a Solaris server with the following config:
SunOS 5.10
Interface IP Address Hostname
ce6 address0     hostname0
ce6:1 address1     hostname1
ce6:2 address2     hostname2
The first installation will be done on <hostname1>.
The second one will be done on <hostname2>.
Each agent will use a port that defaults to 3872.
Can I use the same port 3872 for both installations?
Thanks and regards,
Giuseppe Centioli

Hi Darren.
netstat -an | grep 1831
<hostname1>.1831 <hostnameX>.1399 63980 0
50400 0 ESTABLISHED
*.1831 *.* 0 0
49152 0 LISTEN
Okay, that's incorrect. You'll see that the process is listening on *.1831. In other words, it's listening on all network addresses. That was the specific point I was making earlier. It must not do that. The listener must bind only to the network address chosen.
When it's set up right, you should see a specific address on the LISTEN line, not a *.
The error is an Oracle related error telling
that another LISTENER
has been started with port 1831.Yes, that's the case here. The listener is not binding to the correct address in your configuration. I am not an Oracle DBA, and I can't tell you what the correct syntax is.
Hmm. Okay, here's some stuff from google. Do you have a hostname specified in your listener.ora file?
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = hostname)(PORT = 1521))
Like that?
Darren

Similar Messages

Looking for a chat app to use offline in the same network

Hi
I want an offline app for my customers to download and use in our wireless network.
This app shouldn't go online.
Simply customers device will choose a nickname.
With this nickname he/she will be chatting with people in same network.
Preferably it will be a simple chatroom for everyone.
There are so many chat apps. All talking to world. I want it just inside the hotel complex.
Probably there should be a server side of this app (guessing)
All your help is much appreciated.
You might just let me know a paid, chat server, customisable, running on both android or ios.
Probably a browser adress will be given to customers, than they log in and chat from there?

Flex has a history manager (Flex 2) and deep linking feature
(Flex 3).
For more information see
http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Flex_3:Feature_Introductions:_Deep_Linking
and
http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/deep_linking_1.html
Peter

Use two interfaces on the same network

Hello every one,
I actually starting to work on a cisco project. I'm a beginner on networking and cisco technologie.
For my project we use a router 2921.
We got two network:
- Network A: 192.198.0.X / 255.255.255.0 / Gateway 192.198.0.1
- Network B: 162.168.0.X / 255.255.0.0 / Gateway 162.168.0.1
Each network use switch, Switch A (connecting to network A) is connected to interface G0/0.
And Switch B (connecting to network B) is connected to interface G0/1.
Router well configured as:
- G0/0: ip address 192.198.0.1 255.255.255.0 (network A)
- G0/1: ip address 162.168.0.1 255.255.0.0 (network B)
Every think working fine.
The problem is with this one, we need to connect a computer on G0/2. This computer is configure as network A (192.198.0.10 / 255.255.255.0 and same gateway).
I can't configure G0/2 as 192.198.0.1 255.255.255.0 (network A), cause G0/0 use this adresse.
I can't put this computer on the switch A, my only physical possibilité is to connect him on G0/2.
We just need to use interface G0/0 and G0/2 as a switch on the router with the same gateway (192.198.0.1)
How can i connect this computeur? How can i configure two interfaces on the same network and same gateway?
Thanks you

I would just put the PC on a different network, but if you really want it to be in the same network, you could use IRB to connect two of the interfaces on the router at layer 2.
Here is an example config for IRB:
interface FastEthernet0/0
bridge-group 1
interface FastEthernet0/1
bridge-group 1
bridge irb
interface BVI1
ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
bridge 1 route ip
Notice that the physical ports do not have IP addresses on them, the IP for the subnet is on the BVI interface.

WLC-2106 and multiple interfaces on the same network

Hi there,
I recently created a TAC request to the Cisco support regarding our WLC-2106, but they could not help me. Basically I just learned that you can create new interfaces for the wireless LAN controller and then dedicate them to a given wireless network (SSID). This way I could more effectively utilize network bandwidth also. Problem is that all of the interfaces have to be in a different network segment in order to work, which is not what I want. I specifically want to have several interfaces on the same network segment.
Has anyone tried to accomplish the same?

Basically what I've misunderstood is that all the traffic generated by our wireless clients have been going through the single 100Mbit/s ethernet port on the wireless LAN controller (management interface), and to mitigate this I thought I could create new interfaces (ports) and dedicate those to given WLAN networks.. I see now that this is not supported. Not inside the same network at least.
So, by reading further and consulting my best friend Google I learned about a setting called "AP Mode". Changing that from Local (the default) to H-REAP the APs should not route their traffic anymore through the management interface on the wireless controller, but instead route all the client traffic directly to the local LAN. This way you effectively remove the 100Mbit/s bottle-neck when all the APs were using the management interface both for configuration and client data traffic.
It seems you also have to enable H-REAP Local switching from a given WLAN network in addition to changing the AP Mode of your access points to H-REAP. I'm still in the testing phase here so should anyone have any insight to this, I'd be greatful to hear more.

Solaris 8: Multiple primary interfaces connected to the same network

I have a machine with Solaris 8, and it has multiple interfaces that are connected to the same network which means they all have metric 0 (1 hop) to the default gateway.
assume:
e1000g0: 192.168.30.70
e1000g2: 192.168.30.72
e1000g4: 192.168.30.74
e1000g5: 192.168.30.76
gateway: 192.168.30.65 (Cisco Router)
However, it seems like despite the fact that they have a direct connection, they seem to be using e1000g0 to access the 192.168.30.0 network to get to the default gateway and then to anywhere else.
When I send a ping to say, 192.168.30.74 (IP of e1000g4) and capture packets on e1000g0, I see the "echo reply" messages going out of it as opposed to e1000g4 even though e1000g4 is the one receiving the "echo request". This should not happen and these should be completely independent as they should all be advertising a 1 hop to that network
The outputs from netstat -rn and ifconfig -a are shown in the picture on the link below
[http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/7308/ifconfignetstathiddenip.jpg]
This gets even more confusing when I go into the Cisco router and run the command: "show mac address-table" where only the MAC address of e1000g0 is shown for the switch port it's connected to, but not for the other interfaces which are connected to the switch. Yes, all ports are active (no shut) and are pingable.
Also, the odd thing is that ALL of these individual MACs show up in the router ARP table when the machine comes up, however after sending a ping to one of them, after a certain expiry or whatever period, the MACs disappear from the router ARP table and only the MAC for e1000g0 shows up. The arp table of the solaris machine however shows all the relevant MACs of each port of the router that it's physically connected to (This is actually a Cisco Switch with the advanced IP services imagine and L3 routing turned on)
Before anyone asks: The setting local-mac-address? setting does NOT exist in my machine and it never has, but it used to work fine. Also, from the ifconfig command, once can tell that all the MAC addresses are fine.
I need to somehow assign all these interfaces equal priority and make them understand that they're physically connected to the 192.168.30.0 network and there's no need to go through e1000g0 to get to it.
This is causing a lot of problems as eventually all traffic will end up going through the e1000g0 interface and that will become a bottle neck.
Please help Thanks in advance

Ok thanks. That was a useful response.
I did think about the trunking software that is claimed to be available for Solaris 8, but it's only available if you've got paid support contract. Oracle came and ruined everything re: Sun support which is so expensive now.
The other confusion is, we never had that OR needed to configure trunking/link aggregation on this machine, so why now?
Lastly, by your explanation, this should be expected and is "normal" behaviour, which would mean that this machine was always doing this and I only just noticed it this time? I thought if you turn off ipv4 forwarding and router function in the machine, it's every interface for itself. But it's not doing that :(
So then the question is, Can I force it? I've tried a bunch of things by manipulating the tables and it seems to mess things up where nothing is getting through or it now shifts all the traffic to some other port make the problem no different
Is there a way to give equal weight to all interfaces for the traffic to go directly through them that is originating at those ports?

Is it possible to use both an ILB and an ELB (listening on the same port) in the same Azure cloud service?

I'm building a test Lync deployment on Azure; yes, I know this is not supported, hence "test".
Lync Front-End servers expose two set of web services, one for internal users and one for external ones; they listen on different ports (443 and 4443) on the same servers; when external services are published, you need a reverse proxy or a port forwarding
in order to map port 443 of a public IP address to port 4443 of the Front-End server(s). When you have multiple Front-End servers in a pool, you also need to load-balance them.
So, a typical Lync deployment looks like this:
       Internal users
               |
               443
                  |
          Internal LB
        192.168.0.20
        443         443
          |               |
   Lync FE 1     Lync FE 2
192.168.0.21 192.168.0.22
          |               |
      4443        4443
          External LB
       Public IP Address
                 |
              443
                 |
       External Users
This should be easily replicated in Azure, as it supports both external load balancing and internal load balancing. They are even supported together in the same cloud service, so this configuration should be easy. However, it looks like "should"
is the keyword here.
After creating the external load balanced endpoint (which listens on external port 443 and forwards to port 4443 on the servers), I'm trying to create an internal load balancer and add internal endpoints to is; however, while the ILB can be created successfully,
adding an internal endpoint listening on port 443 and forwarding to port 443 on the servers fails miserably, with an error stating that port 443 is already in use by another endpoint:
Update-AzureVM : BadRequest : Port 443 is already in use by one of the endpoints in this deployment. Ensure that the port numbers are unique across endpoints within a deployment.
For reference, my commands are:
Add-AzureInternalLoadBalancer -InternalLoadBalancerName "LyncILB" -ServiceName "LyncFrontEnd" -SubnetName "LabSubnet" -StaticVNetIPAddress 192.168.0.20
(This completes successfully)
Get-AzureVM LYNCFE1 | Add-AzureEndpoint -Name "Https-Int" -Protocol "tcp" -LocalPort 443 -PublicPort 443 -LBSetName "HttpsIntLB" -DefaultProbe -InternalLoadBalancerName "LyncILB"
(This fails)
The existing external endpoint is configured as such:
Get-AzureVM LYNCFE1 | get-azureendpoint
LBSetName : HttpsExtLB
LocalPort : 4443
Name : HTTPS-Ext
Port : 443
Protocol : tcp
Vip :
ProbePath :
ProbePort : 4443
ProbeProtocol : tcp
ProbeIntervalInSeconds : 15
ProbeTimeoutInSeconds : 31
EnableDirectServerReturn : False
Acl : {}
InternalLoadBalancerName :
IdleTimeoutInMinutes :
LoadBalancerDistribution :
The error doesn't even make a lot of sense; the external load balancer listens on a public IP address, while the internal load balancer listens on a private IP address in the internal network; there
shouldn't be any conflict here... however it looks like there is one instead.
Why doesn't this work? Am I doing something wrong, or is Azure networking just being silly as usual again?

Hello Massimo Pascucci,
The issue that you are facing when creating an endpoint with internal loadbalancer is the limitation of not allowing same ports to be listening under a single cloud service. This reason for this is that there is a limitation of only one private IP (Also
known as the Internal load balanced IP) per cloud service.
There is also a limitation on the Internal load balancer more than one port to be published per load balancer:
You can leave your feedback by following the link below:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/1805c5a0-3906-4cd6-8561-9802d77e0ae5/is-it-possible-to-use-both-an-ilb-and-an-elb-listening-on-the-same-port-in-the-same-azure-cloud?forum=WAVirtualMachinesVirtualNetwork
Refer to this article for more information on Internal load balancer:
http://azure.microsoft.com/blog/2014/05/20/internal-load-balancing/
Thanks,
Syed Irfan Hussain

How can I uniquely identify computers on the same network/account specifically for airdrop use? When I change name on one computer under contacts if changes on all computers.

How can I uniquely identify computers on the same network/account specifically for airdrop use? When I change name on one computer under contacts it changes on all computers. I would like to change icon and name for each computer.

you would need to setup a VPN and tunnel into your office.
FYI..the default ports are 3283 and 5900.

Multiple production clusters on the same network? just change UDP port?

If I want multiple production clusters on the same network do I just make sure each cluster is on it's own multicast port? or are other changes required?
Thanks,
Andrew

Hi Andrew,
I think to be safe it would be best to use a different address and port.
-Dave

Bug with using 2 certificates on a different port on the same machine

There seems to be an issue with using secure connection to the same web location but on a different port.
It is slightly difficult to recreate exactly but very often when one of the connections has been negotiated and the (self-signed) certificate added to Firefox when connecting to the same URL but placing a different port in the browser I get the error...
(Error code: sec_error_bad_signature)
It appears to get in a muddle as to which certificate should be used for which port. They have both been downloaded and the port number appears to be available in the certificate selection process but an error occurs nonetheless.

I belive you can, I think my friends Apple TV is connected to their internet via an Ethernet cable, and we use Airplay sometimes using our iPads that are connected to the same network via WiFi. It should work as long as they are both connected to the same network. However, I don't have an Apple TV of my own, so don't take this as a solid answer.

Using ipad2 and airplay with appleTV; can I have the ipad2 on wifi and the AppleTV on a wired port of the same router in order to use airplay?

can I have the ipad2 on wifi and the AppleTV on a wired port of the same router in order to use airplay?

I belive you can, I think my friends Apple TV is connected to their internet via an Ethernet cable, and we use Airplay sometimes using our iPads that are connected to the same network via WiFi. It should work as long as they are both connected to the same network. However, I don't have an Apple TV of my own, so don't take this as a solid answer.

Can two different local ips use the same port at the same time?

Can two PS3s use the same ports at the same time. So let's say you have two PS3s and they need to open the exact same set of ports at the same time to be able to play the same game online. Is that possible on a regular consumer router such as the wrt310n? If so, then how would someone go about that. I am just asking out of curiosity.
I don't work for Cisco. I'm just here to help.

Use port range Triggering instead of Port forwarding. When you use port triggering then those ports will be opened for the entire local network.

Issue to send email (using sp_send_dbmail) with an attachement located in other server within the same network

I have two servers. One is for databases (DB) with the mail server configured and the other is for SSIS without mail server. Both servers are in the same network. On the SSIS server the SSIS package exports data from the DB server table
to xls file. The file is saved in SSIS server. When I created a task to send the email (using sp_send_dbmail) to attach that file, I got the error message:
Error: Executing the query "EXECUTE [msdb].[dbo].[sp_send_dbmail]
@profile_na..." failed with the following error: "Attachment file H:\test.xls is invalid.".
Any help will be appreciated. Thanks.
A Fan of SSIS, SSRS and SSAS

Where are you running this?
If its in the other server (DB) you need to use UNC path to the SSIS server folder where file resides
Also the executing account should have access to the folder as well as the file. So If you're running this from a job make sure you either provider folder and file access to sql agent job service account or create a separate proxy account with the required
permissions and configure the job to use the account
see
http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mssql/article.php/3789881/Proxy-Accounts-in-SQL-Server.htm
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/28918/SQL-Server-Agent-Proxy
Please Mark This As Answer if it solved your issue
Please Vote This As Helpful if it helps to solve your issue
Visakh
My Wiki User Page
My MSDN Page
My Personal Blog
My Facebook Page

Homeshare worked on my PC until recent iTunes update. Cannot get homeshare to work on PC as previous. When I use my MacBook Pro on the same network, iTunes/AppleTV works just fine, so it has to be iTunes?

An interesting observation...when I have a MacBook Pro connected and select Computers on my AppleTV2, the name of the MacBook computer comes up on the screen and allows me to select it and view photos from my iTunes library. Orks perfectly. When my Windows 8 PC is connected, and I select Computers on my AppleTV, the name of the PC does NOT come up on the computer list, but instead the AppleTV immediately tries to download pictures from the PC itunes library. It runs for ~2 minutes then generates an error message saying it could not connect to the iTunes library and to make sure it is tunrned on, connect to the same network, and use the same blah, blah, blah. I know all the settigns on the network are correct because my MacBook works perfecty. So frustrating that my PC worked previously before the recent iTunes software update. What to do to fix it?

Hi Rickgal,
Thanks for visiting Apple Support Communities.
Based on the information, it does sound like this behavior is isolated to your PC. I recommend trying the troubleshooting steps in this article on your PC:
Troubleshooting Home Sharing
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2972
Start with turning Home Sharing off and on again, as explained in step 3:
Go to File > Home Sharing and choose Turn Off Home Sharing.
Choose File > Home Sharing > Turn On Home Sharing.
When prompted, enter the Apple ID you'd like to use.
Click Turn On Home Sharing, then Done.
Best Regards,
Jeremy

Can I use multiple sa-ns500 on the same network?

Is it possible to use multiple sa-ns500 speakers on the same network? they seem to want to have the same name on the network and therefore only 1 will connect at a time? Can I rename one somehow? Thanks!

Hello Brian,
Welcome to Sony Community.
Please check for the Secure Link option in the Home Theater System or A/V Receiver. This will help isolate the connection to the different Network speakers.
Yes, you can use multiple Network speakers on the same home network.
You can change the Device name using the Setting screen on the browser.
Follow the steps mentioned on the page # 34 and 35 of the User’s manual to start up the browser of the Network speakers and change the Device name.
If my post answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution."

Can I use 2 Time Capsules on the same network

Can I use 2 Time Capsules on the same network
Posted: Jul 23, 2009 1:49 PM Reply Email
Here is what I want to do. I currently have a time capsule used for one end of the house. Currently my 2 kids rooms are in an addition that I have run a cable from the time capsule to each of their rooms. If I want to give them wireless for that part of the house could I add another TC, for wireless and they can both backup their macbooks to that time capsule.
So Can I add a 2nd time capsule to extend by "N" network, or should I just go with an AP express or extreme and let them each have their own HD backup for each macbook?
Brett

Have bought many reconditioned (Refurb) product from Apple site and have always been happy with them. To date none have failed me and we have been Apple customers since 2006. With that said when you buy Refurbs make sure you know what model you are getting. The current TCs on the Apple site are last generation. The way to tell is to check the model number against the current one. Easy way to do this is to put both in the shopping cart and compare the model numbers. The Refurb model number is FB277LL/A and the new TC model is MB765LL/A. The first digits identify whether a Refurb or new, the rest should be the same if they are the same model number.
Before you buy, now which model number you want and then check other sites to compare prices. I recently purchased a new TC on Amazon for a better price then the Apple Store Site. For larger Refurb purchases like MBPs, we choose to buy directly from Apple; but for peripherals we often buy from OWC, Amazon, and other sites. Hope this helps.

Using ports of the same network interface

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for