Using Wide Gamut (Dell u2711) With Lightroom

I have just completed an upgrade of my computer system to include 2 Dell U2711 27" monitors.  I am using LR 3.5.  My system is running with Windows 7 64 bit and a ATI Firepro graphics card running the displays. 
Before purchasing these, and listening to the chatter on various forums I was led to belive that I was going to get garish coloration on all applications except Adobe LR and CS5.  This does not seem to be the case.  LR and CS5 are fine and the other applications IE and Windows Office seem to be OK as well.
These displays are calibrated at the factory.
Does anyone have any experience with these and can share any "gotchas" with me.
Henry

Well I am glad that I am taking my time on this calibration process.  I thought I had it understood correctly.  I am making my dialog with Dell a part of this message so you can see the exchange I had with their 2nd level of support and I am also a document from Dell engineering.  Please take a look at these and I will call Dell again if necessary.
Sorry For The Long Post
Otrman
FROM MY EXCHANGE WITH DELL:
It would be excellent if I could use a calibrated “custom” present on the monitor for LR and CS5 and simply select one of the presets (sRGB or Adobe RGB) when I am not using LR and CS5.   I am not running with any monitor profile and a generic PNP driver now and I am getting much better results than I expected.  I would just un-select the profile when I did not want to use the calibrated “custom” preset. 
Based on the data engineering provided me in  the document I sent that is correct( Yes).
From: Henry Morse [email protected]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 4:30 PM
To: Glickman, David
Subject: RE: PremierColor FAQ_SVC.doc Case 844545167
David, Please just say yes or no to this:
Are you telling me that ONLY the “custom” preset will be altered and that the other presets will remain at the “factory” settings. 
Yes or No, believe me it is very important and will increase sales of this monitor if this statement gets passed along as true.  Is this worth a  conversation between you and engineering to verify?  It would be to me and the rest of us photographers.  Sorry, but this statement in the documentation is not the way I used to word my writings as an electrical engineer back in the day.
Henry
From: [email protected] [email protected]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 4:47 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: PremierColor FAQ_SVC.doc Case 844545167
Based on the data engineering provided me in  the document I sent that is correct.
David
From: Henry Morse [email protected]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 3:22 PM
To: Glickman, David
Subject: RE: PremierColor FAQ_SVC.doc Case 844545167
Importance: High
David,
I still need clarification here.
“My personal suggestion is that since you are doing custom photo/video work that these LCD are being used for, I would calibrate them for your business purposes and  leave as such. With the enhanced video settings normal internet browsing and  such will have better clarity.”
Are you telling me that ONLY the “custom” preset will be altered and that the other presets will remain at the “factory” settings.  This is an important question for all of us who want to use this monitor for photographic work.  If we photographers can have one of the presets, namely, “custom” calibrated, and the others left as shipped then we can choose the customer preset for our work and switch back to sRGB or Adobe RGB for routine office and billing functions.   If this is true, and the photography world learns of this, Dell will sell a lot of U2711s, especially considering that the U2711 is an excellent price performer. an
I have been doing research on this for myself and to share with a number of user forums on photography.  I want to get right for my own use and for sharing with the photography community.
Henry
From: [email protected] [email protected]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 8:26 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: PremierColor FAQ_SVC.doc Case 844545167
Henry,
Per the documents  as with any calibration you must be careful and  aware of settings you change. Use the setting CUSTOM COLOR if you want to calibrate using your own equipment as per document.
In regards to your question on your video card as the manufacture /forums recommends you should disable any color managements since you are using your own color/video calibration tools.
My personal suggestion is that since you are doing custom photo/video work that these LCD are being used for, I would calibrate them for your business purposes and  leave as such. With the enhanced video settings normal internet browsing and  such will have better clarity.
Have a good  day.
David
From: Henry Morse [email protected]
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 6:08 PM
To: Glickman, David
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: PremierColor FAQ_SVC.doc Case 844545167
Good Evening David,
Thank you for taking the time to discuss color management for my recently acquired U2711 monitors.
According to what we discussed when I use calibration hardware and software you mentioned that I should use only the “custom” setting and that once I calibrated the monitor “all”  factory setting would be overwritten and cannot be restored.  When I read the word document you sent me I believe I am seeing something that needs clarification:
Question 7 from the word document:
7.         Is it possible to revert to factory pre-tuned settings after I color calibrated my unit with my equipment?
The customer should not re-calibrate and save your result in sRGB and AdobeRGB preset modes.  Once overwritten, it is not possible to revert back to factory pre-tuned setting.  The customer is advised to use the "Custom Color" preset mode to do their own calibrations.
Does this mean that only the “custom” preset is altered from the factory setting to store the results of my calibration?   Does this mean that if I use the “custom” preset only for calibration that sRGB and AdobeRGP will not be changed from the factory setting?  Does this mean that each of the U2711 presets have its own LUT table?  Can you please clarify?
If this turns out  to be the case I can use the sRGB preset, with no profile as it is now, for routine processing with non-color aware applications, and then select the newly calibrated “custom” preset when doing photo processing.  Is this the case?  After reading the attachment I believe I have to be very careful not to negatively affect my monitors as they cannot be reverted to factory settings. 
I have done some additional research that includes the relationship between monitors and some high end graphics cards such as the ATI Firepro V5800 card I am using.  This research indicates that I should disable any efforts by the graphics card to do color management lest I interfere with the efforts to calibrate the monitors.
I am probably being a bit picky but having more than 50 years in the technical end of computers I have been burned more than once having two elements of a computing system fight each other.
Again, thank you for your help on this.
Henry
From: [email protected] [email protected]
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 9:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: PremierColor FAQ_SVC.doc
Good  Morning  Henry,
Just to follow up on our phone conversation.  I have attached a word document regarding some of the question on the U2711 settings and  calibration. I also have a couple of hyperlinks one to the Dell support on the  monitor.  Based on our conversation I believe I have answered your questions regarding the calibration of the LCD.  Please let me  know later or over the weekend if you still have questions and I will follow up with you on Monday if needed.
Dell manual link:
http://www.support.dell.com/support/edocs/MONITORS/U2711b/en/index.htm
I have included a couple of non-Dell support links for you to do some testing
http://www.gballard.net/psd/go_live_page_profile/embeddedJPEGprofiles.html#
http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/
http://yfrog.com/3u100percentrampp
Have a great weekend
David Glickman
Advanced Technical Analyst| Executive Escalations | MCP,MCDST, MCITP,MCSE
Dell | Client Resolution Expert Center, Global Services
phone +1 512 513 6078;  800 289 3355, ext. 5136078
Office hours:  7:00 am - 4:00 pm Central, Monday - Friday
Customer feedback | How am I doing? Please contact my manager, [email protected]
Confidentiality Notice | This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or proprietary information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, immediately contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
FROM THE ENGINEERING DOCUMENT: (SEE QUESTION 7)
Service & Support:
1.         Can I request Dell to re-calibrate my monitor during the warranty period?
Calibration is done for only new monitors shipped from factory.
Each unit is factory-calibrated as part of the production process.
Dell will not be able to re-calibrate the monitor during warranty
Period as calibration is done only for new units.
2.         Can I request Dell to provide another Color Calibration Factory Report in the event of the loss of or damage to the report?
Each Color Calibration Factory Report is unique to each Dell monitor and cannot be reprinted.
We would recommend that the customer takes care to retain the Color Calibration Factory Report if required.
3.         Is there a specification for color accuracy? If so, how do I check if my monitor meets the specification?
Dell calibrates the U2410/U2711 according to the DeltaE(1931) standard using equipment that can accurately measure high color gamut panels.
4.         Will Dell guarantee all replacement units are also color calibrated?
The color calibration is only done for new units shipped from factory; thus, replacement units will not be color-calibrated.
5.         In the event of warranty exchange, will the replacement unit come with a similar Color Calibration report?
Dell does not do the color calibration on the replacement units, as such, there will not be a Color Calibration Factory Report or similar attached to replacement units.
In cases where a brand new unit from factory needs to be shipped as a replacement unit, a Color Calibrated Factory Report will be shipped with it.
6.         Why does Dell only provide the Color Calibration Factory Report for new factory units of U2410/U2711?
The color calibration is done at factory to ensure color is accurate for each unit of U2410/U2711 when it reaches the customer.
7.         Is it possible to revert to factory pre-tuned settings after I color calibrated my unit with my equipment?
The customer should not re-calibrate and save your result in sRGB and AdobeRGB preset modes.  Once overwritten, it is not possible to revert back to factory pre-tuned setting.  The customer is advised to use the "Custom Color" preset mode to do their own calibrations.
8.         How do I use this Color Calibration Factory Report?
The Color Calibration Factory Report is provided for customer’s reference that Dell does color-calibration on the U2410/U2711 to ensure color accuracy and consistency for each unit of U2410/U2711 shipped.
9.         My own measurements of sRGB, gamma or AdobeRGB are not meeting the values stated in the report. Why is this so and can I get an exchange?
One of the reasons could be the different type of color calibration equipment used. There are many types of color calibration equipment in the market.
Dell ensures Color Accuracy based on the Dell approved Color-Calibration equipment at Dell’s factory.

Similar Messages

  • Colour difference issues on wide gamut Dell 3007wfp

    Hey guys,
    I was wondering if someone could help with this problem that is driving me insane. I have tried a lot of possible solutions I found online, but nothing seems to work.
    The problem I've got is that when I save a JPEG in Photoshop through Save for web I get oversaturated and darker colours in web browsers on both of my monitors.
    What I am trying to achieve is seeing the same colours in PS as the ones I get in web browsers. I don't really care about the colours in PS being incorrect for print, etc, as I am a web designer and the only thing that matters to me is monitor colour.
    While playing around with colour settings (changing them and then doing a Save for web) I was able to achieve exactly the same colours on both monitors that did at the same time match the initial Photoshop design - stupidly I can't remember what I have changed in the existing PS file colour settings, but the colours went quite dull, then when saving for web they looked exactly how I wanted them to look on both monitors, they also did match the initial colour of the PS file. Of course switching to different colour settings each time I need to save something for web is not ideal, but I would be quite happy if someone could explain to me how to at least achieve this...
    My setup:
    Dell 3007wfp wide gamut
    Dell 2405wfp
    Windows 7 64bit
    Photoshop CS4 64bit
    Pantone Huey calibrator
    My Windows colour management settings:
    My Photoshop colour settings for the file I am working on atm:
    Any help would be much appreciated.
    Thank you

    I don't really care about the colours in PS being incorrect for print,
    etc, as I am a web designer and the only thing that matters to me is
    monitor colour.
    photoshop prints through a Source Profile> Print Profile CONVERSION
    your monitor profile has nothing to do with how Ps prints your source color
    (at least in my work flow)
    photoshop displays RGB color through a Source Profile> Monitor Profile CONVERSION
    your print profile has nothing to do with how Ps displays your source color
    after you get your monitor profile ruled out,
    the next step is to verify if Ps is using the correct Source Profile, and if you are Saving your web images in sRGB, and if you are embedding the sRGB profile or not
    the last step would be to nail down if your test browser reads embedded profiles (it is color managed like Ps)
    and what profile the browser applies by Default (in the case it is not color managed, or the test files are untagged)
    and if that Default profile is then CONVERTED to Monitor RGB or sent straight to the monitor...

  • How to use new iPad3 in conjunction with Lightroom on desktop iMac?

    Workflow:  Will this work?  Camera RAW to iPad3 to Lightroom???
    I would like to use my new iPad3 in conjunction with my already-established Lightroom workflow on my desktop Mac.  What I have in mind is to shoot in RAW (Sony SLT A-65 - 24.3 megapixels) and then, in the field, transfer my photos from the camera to the iPad3 (64GB version).  On the iPad I might do some rudimentary editing - deleting duds, etc. - but I will still do all my significant editing in Lightroom on the Mac.  Thus, I need to import the photos, from the iPad, in either RAW or DNG into LightRoom once I get back to my office.  My questions are:
    Is it possible to import RAW photos into the iPad3 and either keep them in RAW or convert them to DNG?
    Is it possible to export RAW or DNG photos from the iPad3 into Lightroom?
    What app(s) do I need on the iPad3 to make this happen?
    FYI - I am using Lightroom3, but will upgrade to Lightroom4 if that makes any difference in whether this will work or not.
    Thanks so much, in advance, for your suggestions and your advice!

    You can load your RAW images to any iPad either using the Camera Connection kit that comes with two dongles. One for inserting an SD card from your camera to load the images. Or the USB dongle which you can connect the USB cord for your camera to the iPad to load the images. There are a few CF card readers that will work with the iPad if your camera uses those a Google search will feret them out for you. Additionally, you can also load images to iPad, iPhone or iPod touch (as well as laptops and desktop cumputers) using WiFi as you capture them using an EyeFi SD card.
    http://www.eye.fi/
    A good app for working with EyeFi on the iPad is Shuttersnitch (though, it does not coordinate with Lightroom)
    http://www.shuttersnitch.com/
    Unfortunately their isn't any RAW processing image editing software for the iPad that Lightroom can make use of the edits. Though there is an app called Photosmith that will allow you to rate, label, add keywords etc. then you can upload that info to Lightroom on your laptop or desktop cimputer and have that info synced to the images. You do have to transfer the image files themselves from the iPad to your workstation seperately.
    http://www.photosmithapp.com/

  • Is it posible to connect dell u2711 with display port to thunderbolt display.

    I want to buy a macbook pro 15 2011 and thunderbolt display.
    But I got a dell u2711 and I want to use this screen.
    my question. Can I connect macbook pro to thunderbolt to dell u2711. for dual 27 screen

    Yes, you can.
    I have a similar configuration : same monitor but my macbook pro is late 2013. use a displayport cable for best results. you will be able to get 2560 x 1440 resolution.

  • Dell U2711 and Lightroom

    Hi all,
    Just bought 27 inch monitor with max resolution on ~2500 *1450.  (Previously used a dell 1900*1080 Dell monitor)
    I am now unable to see any photos in library or see new photos that are loaded in, but lightroom tells me they are there.
    Photos load into CS5 with the same monitor and are visible OK.
    Would be grateful for any advice
    Mike Stephenson UK

    Hi All,
    Calibrated the screen set at "custom colour" , all photos now visible- most peculiar
    Mike Stephenson

  • Can I use the new Photos app with Lightroom?

    I have been a user of Aperture but with the new Photos app I can no longer do that.  Will Lightroom work with the new Photos app?  I want better editing tools than Photos offers.

    No, Lightroom and Photos cannot share a Library. They are both Photo Managers (neither is actually an editor) with non-destructive processing. The only way to get from one to another is to export to the Finder then import to the second app. It's hard to see a workflow that encompasses both apps.
    Really you need to decide which app you want to use to manage your Photos: Photos is a free app geared at the consumer with a phone or point and shoot. Lightroom is geared for the serious hobbyist or Pro with a DSLR, Which photographer are you? Best to pick one horse and ride it.   

  • Using an external hard drive with Lightroom

    I have older photos on an external hard drive and my newer ones on an internal hard drive.  If I plug in my ext hd and load those photos into Lightroom, do I have to always have it plugged in to be able to edit/view those photos?

    For Lightroom 4 and earlier, yes you must have the drive plugged in to edit or view the photos (although Lightroom will display a thumbnail in the Grid module even with the drive not plugged in)
    For Lightroom 5, if you create smart previews, then you can view and edit the photos even when the drive is unplugged.

  • Using Camera Raw 6.3 with Lightroom 2.7

    I recently purchased a Nikon D7000 which is supported in Camera Raw 6.3. I'm using LR 2.7 which is accessing Camera Raw 5.7.
    Can I upgrade to CR 6.3 in LR 2.7?
    thanks

    I have also purchased the Nikon D7000.
    Downloaded and installed LR 3.3RC. Also downloaded and installed ACR 6.3R1.
    Both work with the D7000 NEF-files with ONE exception. If I shoot a "Multiple Exposure" (one feature of the D7000)  the resulting image in both LR and ACR displays in "pink". All other images display correctly.
    If I open the pink images in Nikon Capture NX2 2.2.6 they open correctly.
    If I use the White Balance tool in LR i can bring the image to "almost normal" but the WB values are Temp: 2150, Tint: -138. Conclusion: the Multi Exposure Image from the D7000 is completely mismatched by LR/ACR. But they are correctly matched by Capture NX2.
    This obviously needs to be corrected before final release.

  • How can I use Perfect Photo Studio 12 with lightroom 5?

    How do I get Portrait Pro Studio 12 into lightroom?

    Goto link- all the details are there
    How do I get PortraitPro Studio to work as a plug-in to Lightroom? - Portrait Professional Support

  • Best way to configure Photoshop workflow settings when source photos are shot in AdobeRGB, edited using a wide gamut display, and output to sRGB?

    Being able to quickly produce finished photos is of importance with the majority of my photography work. Therefore I shoot, process, and deliver JPEG files. For this time sensitive workflow there is no benefit to my clients by my shooting RAW. I do want to be able to accommodate any possible future uses of the photos, so I shoot using the Adobe RGB color space. The output for my clients are JPEG images for use on the Web, therefore sRGB. I currently used a wide gamut display (NEC PA302W) with a 24-bit graphics card. (I plan on upgrading to a 30-bit card sometime in the future.)
    I've noticed that in Internet Explorer the reds in my finished photos are overly intense on my display. My photos look fine in other web browsers on my display. This situation has me concerned as I do not know exactly why it is happening since my photos have the sRBG color profile embedded and IE supports embedded color profiles. If anything, I would think the reds would be overly intense in other applications that do not support embedded color profiles.
    Please let me know if my workflow can be improved, outside of shooting RAW and using a 30-bit display:
    Shoot JPEG photos in Adobe RBG color space
    Edit photos in Photoshop using wide gamut display, 24-bit
    Color Settings: Monitor Color (Monitor RGB -  PA302W, calibrated)
    Save for Web, JPEG, Embed Color Profile, Convert to sRGB
    While working in Photoshop the reds appear fine. When saving for the Web and previewing 'Monitor Color' the reds are intense, when previewing 'Internet Standard RGB (No Color Management)' the reds appear fine. The final saved images look fine with the exception of when displayed in IE, which supports embedded color profiles- Color Management.

    You're rapidly making a mess out of this. Stop, sit back, and stop thinking there's a "problem" to "fix". There isn't - you just need to use software that is color managed. That disqualifies IE right off. Stop using it, throw it away. It's useless with wide gamut displays. Use Firefox, which has proper color management.
    OK. Save For Web in sRGB, embed profile. So far so good. But:
    Don't ! set your working space to Monitor Color!. That turns off display color management which is the very last thing you want with a wide gamut monitor. You could sort of get away with that with a standard gamut monitor, because it's not all that different from sRGB anyway. So you wouldn't notice the difference (but it's there). The fact that your Adobe RGB files look right in Photoshop is purely coincidental. Any other profile will look wrong.
    With a wide gamut display you absolutely and unconditionally need a fully color managed pipeline. That means 1. an embedded document profile, 2. a valid display profile (Spectraview or other calibrator), and 3. an application that reads both profiles and does the conversion from one to the other as the image is sent to the display.
    See, it's not just the document profile. That's half of it. The other half is the display profile. IE doesn't use the display profile, instead substituting sRGB. And that's very wrong with that monitor. Firefox is fully color managed if there is an embedded document profile. But it can be configured to color manage even if the image is untagged (and a lot of material on the web is untagged). It does this by assigning sRGB to the image.
    To configure this - and you really need that with a wide gamut monitor - type "about:config" without the quotes in the address bar and hit reload. Scroll down to gfx.color_management.mode, and change it from 2 to 1. Relaunch. All web material will now appear correctly regardless.

  • Firefox 3.6 color management incorrect on wide-gamut monitors?

    Hi,
    I'm having a problem with sRGB JPEGs exported from Lightroom (2.7) that I don't actually think is LR's fault, but was wondering if anyone here has experienced this.
    What I'm finding is that these sRGB JPEGs don't display correctly on my wide-gamut Dell 2408WFP monitor under Windows 7 in Firefox 3.6.9 or in the Windows image viewer. Now, this isn't the standard problem people used to complain about on wide-gamut monitors, where sRGB images came out looking oversaturated (pinkish) in FF because older versions of FF didn't do color management; the newer Firefox seems to be doing color management in general. The problem I'm seeing in my photos is that dark areas are becoming darker and losing detail, and midrange shadows are turning into a grayish green.
    What's odd is that these JPEGs look fine in Safari on the same machine and the same monitor (and they also look fine if I load them into PS). That suggests to me that Firefox (and Windows) are doing something wrong, probably related to the fact that the monitor is wide-gamut.
    Has anyone encountered this problem?
    Thanks,
    nj

    Jim,
    I think you are right in saying that it is a crap shoot. There are some interesting points in your post though.
    The general public will be viewing with a monitor and browser that are not color managed. Won't my v4 images diplay fairly well under this situation (at least much better than with ff3.6 and a monitor with a v4 profile)?
    That will work just fine indeed. It is arguable whether it will look "better". The variation between monitors is much larger than the benefit you gain from using v4. One thing that will work better is the out of sRGB gamut colors. You won't get the posterization using the v4 sRGB profile that you get with the v2 sRGB. For some images (think shots of flowers) that might be a major benefit. If all your colors are in sRGB that is obviously not a benefit at all. The big disadvantage of using v4 sRGB is that it adds quite a few extra kilobytes (about 60) to your image. For example, I just exported from Lightroom a simple web sized image at 1000 pixels long side at good quality and in v4 it was 262 kB, while in v2 sRGB it weighs in at only 209 kB. I see no real difference between these images on my wide-gamut monitor. This difference in filesize can be important and at smaller sizes is really going to matter.
    What about a wide gamut monitor that's not color managed, running a browser that doesn't support v4?
    The v4 sRGB image will look just as badly oversaturated as the normal sRGB one. Try it and you'll see. Perhaps slightly less oversaturated but the difference is very small in general. The one thing that you should realize of course is that if these users are running a non-managed browser on a wide gamut display, they are likely conditioned to oversaturated images and probably will never even notice. These users are lost anyway. It's best not to even try to target them. Target normal users who generally run unmanaged browsers on unmanaged sRGB-like displays. The variation between these displays is far larger than the slight advantage you get from using sRGB v4 and in my mind at least it is not worth the added size in the picture and the loss of color management in Firefox. Of course, you might have different priorities.
    P.S. the numbers of users using unmanaged browsers are waning quite quickly if I am to believe my website's stats - IE is way down and both Safari and Firefox are up. Chrome (not managed) is coming up too but not as fast as IE is decreasing. Apparently (I haven't tried as I don't do windows) the latest IE does respect embedded color profiles, but alas it doesn't translate to the monitor profile. That is of course basically useless.

  • Problem with Lightroom and Infrared Photography

    This problem is specifically related to using LR & PS to process Infrared images. I apologize if this forum may not be the correct place to ask this question.  I am having problems processing Infrared Images when using LR & PS.  I take my IR images with a 530 IR conversion to a Canon G12 camera.  I learned early on Adobe products don't play well with IR images (they come in magenta when importing ) so I bring IR images shot withmy G12  into my computer with Canon Digital Photo Professional and then work in LR & PS from there. 
    If I then directly open this imported image from my hard drive into Photoshop and try and do adjustments such as blue sky adjustments with a red/blue channel swap, it works fine, just as I would expect.
    (If you are not familiar with IR processing, I understand this introduction and question will not make sense)
    But when using Lightroom, I sometimes have issues. I always import all my images into LR. Even with IR images, after using DPP to bring them to my computer, I import them into LR for cataloging purposes and to make other potential adjustments. Then my usual workflow is to move photos from LR to Photoshop via the "edit in" command. This opens a dialog box giving a choice of "edit a copy with LR adjustments" which is the default option and the one I always use, or "edit original".
    Here's the interesting thing I finally discovered.
    If I send the photo from LR to PS using the "edit a copy with Lightroom adjustments" option, I get a bad blue sky effect, where the sky is green and the foliage is pink instead of the sky being blue and the foliage yellow. But if I send it to PS using the "edit original" option, the blue sky effect works fine.
    So there appears to be an issue when tring to send IR images from Lightroom to Photoshop. Any thoughts?
    Thanks,
    Matthew Kraus

    Thanks so much for working on this.
    I fear the behavior you noticed was just due to the fact I cheanged the
    file from 16 bit to 8 bit so the size was smaller and I could easily email
    it.  When I open any of my regular 16 bit files, whether I send them to PS
    as "edit original" or "edit copy with lightroom adjustments", they both end
    up as 16 bit and as far as I can see, seem the same, though obviously they
    are not.
    I don't really have a preset, but I'll walk you through the process.
    1. Choose Channel Mixer from the Adjustment Pannel
    2. Make sure the output channel is red, change the red channel slider from
    100% to 0% and increase the blue channel slider from 0% to 100%.  You can
    type in the values.
    3. Change the output channel to blue.  Increase the red channel from 0% to
    100% and the blue channel from 100% to 0%.
    This is supposed to change the sky from brown to blue and the foliage from
    blue to yellow and is what happens when you use the "edit original"
    option.  When you use the "edit copy with lightroom adjustments", the sky
    turns green and the foliage pink.  So you get 2 different behaviors,
    depending on which option you use to bring the image from LR to PS.
    That's my question, why do you get 2 different behaviors?
    Thanks,
    Matthew Kraus

  • Why does Lightroom (and Photoshop) use AdobeRGB and/or ProPhoto RGB as default color spaces, when most monitors are standard gamut (sRGB) and cannot display the benefits of those wider gamuts?

    I've asked this in a couple other places online as I try to wrap my head around color management, but the answer continues to elude me. That, or I've had it explained and I just didn't comprehend. So I continue. My confusion is this: everywhere it seems, experts and gurus and teachers and generally good, kind people of knowledge claim the benefits (in most instances, though not all) of working in AdobeRGB and ProPhoto RGB. And yet nobody seems to mention that the majority of people - including presumably many of those championing the wider gamut color spaces - are working on standard gamut displays. And to my mind, this is a huge oversight. What it means is, at best, those working this way are seeing nothing different than photos edited/output in sRGB, because [fortunately] the photos they took didn't include colors that exceeded sRGB's real estate. But at worst, they're editing blind, and probably messing up their work. That landscape they shot with all those lush greens that sRGB can't handle? Well, if they're working in AdobeRGB on a standard gamut display, they can't see those greens either. So, as I understand it, the color managed software is going to algorithmically reign in that wild green and bring it down to sRGB's turf (and this I believe is where relative and perceptual rendering intents come into play), and give them the best approximation, within the display's gamut capabilities. But now this person is editing thinking they're in AdobeRGB, thinking that green is AdobeRGB's green, but it's not. So any changes they make to this image, they're making to an image that's displaying to their eyes as sRGB, even if the color space is, technically, AdobeRGB. So they save, output this image as an AdobeRGB file, unaware that [they] altered it seeing inaccurate color. The person who opens this file on a wide gamut monitor, in the appropriate (wide gamut) color space, is now going to see this image "accurately" for the first time. Only it was edited by someone who hadn't seen it accurately. So who know what it looks like. And if the person who edited it is there, they'd be like, "wait, that's not what I sent you!"
    Am I wrong? I feel like I'm in the Twilight Zone. I shoot everything RAW, and I someday would love to see these photos opened up in a nice, big color space. And since they're RAW, I will, and probably not too far in the future. But right now I export everything to sRGB, because - internet standards aside - I don't know anybody who I'd share my photos with, who has a wide gamut monitor. I mean, as far as I know, most standard gamut monitors can't even display 100% sRGB! I just bought a really nice QHD display marketed toward design and photography professionals, and I don't think it's 100. I thought of getting the wide gamut version, but was advised to stay away because so much of my day-to-day usage would be with things that didn't utilize those gamuts, and generally speaking, my colors would be off. So I went with the standard gamut, like 99% of everybody else.
    So what should I do? As it is, I have my Photoshop color space set to sRGB. I just read that Lightroom as its default uses ProPhoto in the Develop module, and AdobeRGB in the Library (for previews and such).
    Thanks for any help!
    Michael

    Okay. Going bigger is better, do so when you can (in 16-bit). Darn, those TIFs are big though. So, ideally, one really doesn't want to take the picture to Photoshop until one has to, right? Because as long as it's in LR, it's going to be a comparatively small file (a dozen or two MBs vs say 150 as a TIF). And doesn't LR's develop module use the same 'engine' or something, as ACR plug-in? So if your adjustments are basic, able to be done in either LR Develop, or PS ACR, all things being equal, choose to stay in LR?
    ssprengel Apr 28, 2015 9:40 PM
    PS RGB Workspace:  ProPhotoRGB and I convert any 8-bit documents to 16-bit before doing any adjustments.
    Why does one convert 8-bit pics to 16-bit? Not sure if this is an apt comparison, but it seems to me that that's kind of like upscaling, in video. Which I've always taken to mean adding redundant information to a file so that it 'fits' the larger canvas, but to no material improvement. In the case of video, I think I'd rather watch a 1080p movie on an HD (1080) screen (here I go again with my pixel-to-pixel prejudice), than watch a 1080p movie on a 4K TV, upscaled. But I'm ready to be wrong here, too. Maybe there would be no discernible difference? Maybe even though the source material were 1080p, I could still sit closer to the 4K TV, because of the smaller and more densely packed array of pixels. Or maybe I only get that benefit when it's a 4K picture on a 4K screen? Anyway, this is probably a different can of worms. I'm assuming that in the case of photo editing, converting from 8 to 16-bit allows one more room to work before bad things start to happen?
    I'm recent to Lightroom and still in the process of organizing from Aperture. Being forced to "this is your life" through all the years (I don't recommend!), I realize probably all of my pictures older than 7 years ago are jpeg, and probably low-fi at that. I'm wondering how I should handle them, if and when I do. I'm noting your settings, ssprengel.
    ssprengel Apr 28, 2015 9:40 PM
    I save my PS intermediate or final master copy of my work as a 16-bit TIF still in the ProPhotoRGB, and only when I'm ready to share the image do I convert to sRGB then 8-bits, in that order, then do File / Save As: Format=JPG.
    Part of the same question, I guess - why convert back to 8-bits? Is it for the recipient?  Do some machines not read 16-bit? Something else?
    For those of you working in these larger color spaces and not working with a wide gamut display, I'd love to know if there are any reasons you choose not to. Because I guess my biggest concern in all of this has been tied to what we're potentially losing by not seeing the breadth of the color space we work in represented while making value adjustments to our images. Based on what several have said here, it seems that the instances when our displays are unable to represent something as intended are infrequent, and when they do arise, they're usually not extreme.
    Simon G E Garrett Apr 29, 2015 4:57 AM
    With 8 bits, there are 256 possible values.  If you use those 8 bits to cover a wider range of colours, then the difference between two adjacent values - between 100 and 101, say - is a larger difference in colour.  With ProPhoto RGB in 8-bits there is a chance that this is visible, so a smooth colour wedge might look like a staircase.  Hence ProPhoto RGB files might need to be kept as 16-bit TIFs, which of course are much, much bigger than 8-bit jpegs.
    Over the course of my 'studies' I came across a side-by-side comparison of either two color spaces and how they handled value gradations, or 8-bit vs 16-bit in the same color space. One was a very smooth gradient, and the other was more like a series of columns, or as you say, a staircase. Maybe it was comparing sRGB with AdobeRGB, both as 8-bit. And how they handled the same "section" of value change. They're both working with 256 choices, right? So there might be some instances where, in 8-bit, the (numerically) same segment of values is smoother in sRGB than in AdobeRGB, no? Because of the example Simon illustrated above?
    Oh, also -- in my Lumix LX100 the options for color space are sRGB or AdobeRGB. Am I correct to say that when I'm shooting RAW, these are irrelevant or ignored? I know there are instances (certain camera effects) where the camera forces the shot as a jpeg, and usually in that instance I believe it will be forced sRGB.
    Thanks again. I think it's time to change some settings..

  • Soft proofing problem with wide-gamut monitor

    Hi,
    I've just upgraded to a wide-gamut monitor (Dell U2713H).
    I set the colour-space to adobe RGB when using Lightroom (I'm on LR5).
    When I select soft proofing , my picture goes grey (that is, where I was displaying the photo in the border, then changes to a uniform grey within the proofing border). If I click on 'create proof copy' the picture then displays.
    When the picture is grey and I move my mouse over the image, I can see the RGB% values change, as if there is an image there.
    Previously, I had a (rather) low-end viewsonic and had no problems - Soft-Proofing worked fine. All I did was install the new monitor.
    I'm running windows 7, nvidia 8800GT card, 8gb memory. No system changes prior/after changing the monitor.
    Everything else on the monitor works fine (better than fine, actually, it is a great monitor)
    Soft-proofing in photoshop (CS6) works fine, for what that is worth.
    I'm a bit stumped. Can anyone help?
    hans

    1234ewqrd wrote:
    I set the colour-space to adobe RGB when using Lightroom (I'm on LR5).
    What do you mean by this? Are you selecting Adobe RGB as color profile for you rmonitor? Or are you talking about selecting Adobe RGB as softproofing color space in Lr?
    The fact that your images are grey in Lr is a strong indication that your new monitor is not calibrated and is way off the chart. It might be brand new but that does not mean that its tonality and color display is correct for photo editing in Lr.
    Calibration is done with a piece of hardware called a spectrometer and the accompanying software. Brand names are Spyder, ColorMunki, GretaghMacbeth. After calibration the software creates a profile that is used by the monitor.
    You don't select any other profile than the profile created by calibration and profiling for photo editing - irrespective of which program you use for photo editing.
    In the meantime - as a temporary remedy and until you get the calibration tools - you can set your monitor to sRGB. Be aware that sRGB is a much smaller color space than what you rmonitor is able to display; with sRGB you basically prevent the monitor from displaing wide gamut.
    See here on how to set the monitor to sRGB:
    http://members.lightroomqueen.com/index.php?/Knowledgebase/Article/View/1137/188/how-do-i- change-my-monitor-profile-to-check-whether-its-corrupted
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/4977176#4977176
    Everything else on the monitor works fine (better than fine, actually, it is a great monitor)
    You have no way of telling if the monitor works fine, i.e. if the monitor has the correct intensity (brightness) and if it displays the colors correctly, i.e. as a true representation of the color numbers. Our brain automatically adjusts colors to what they ought to be. What we see is basically unreliable for photo editing. Only a calibrated monitor will display the colors correctly.
    Also, when you calibrate select an intensity (brightness) of araound 110 cd/m2 - irrespective of what the software suggests. Often monitors are way to bright which results in prints that are too dark.

  • Help with colour profiles and wide gamut monitor

    Hi there,
    I know this issue must crop up a lot due to its confusing nature but I would really appreciate it if someone could explain what settings I should be using in Photoshop to get accurate colours. I had a look around and couldn't find any other discussions that answered this exactly.
    My set up is a Dell 2408WFP monitor which is wide-gamut. I have calibrated this using a huey Pro calibrator (therefore have an accurate system colour profile). My photos are in Canon sRGB space, set by Digital Photo Professional (obviously easily changed if need be).
    What I would like is to be able to preview what my photos will look like on a standard sRGB display. When I open a photo in Photoshop with all the settings on their default it looks extremely washed out, very low contrast and saturation. This is nothing like what the photos look like outside of Photoshop, and also not what the photos look like on other (normal gamut) displays. I have tried using the "proof colours" settings. When I have "proof setup" set to Internet Standard sRGB the colours look dreadful, oranges become blood-red, definitely not what I am getting when I view the image on a standard monitor. If I have it set to Monitor RGB then I get colours that look like my monitor outside of Photoshop -- this is the closest out of the three to the result I am actually getting on standard gamut displays. However I know it is not accurate because I know my monitor is wide gamut and therefore more has more contrast (and this is the case).
    So what combination of photo colour space, proof colour space, and proof colours settings should I be using? My main priority is just the Joe Average using his TN panel monitor on facebook, I accept that on my monitor they will look slightly different. Settings for print don't concern me at the moment.
    Thanks for the help. To anyone who will suggest that I read up on colour profiles... I have, and I understand them to an extent, but there are so many variables here that I am getting lost (monitor profile, photo profile, photoshop settings, DPP settings, faststone viewer's settings, browser's lack of awareness...)
    Andrew

    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
    thekrimsonchin wrote:
    I know this issue must crop up a lot due to its confusing nature
    You have no idea. 
    What I'm reading is that you want Photoshop, with its color management enabled, to display your sRGB photos as they would be seen on a true sRGB monitor - i.e., accurately.
    Something to always keep in mind, when everything's set right and working properly:  Your sRGB image displayed on your wide gamut monitor without color management (e.g., by Internet Explorer) will look bolder and brighter (more color-saturated) than the same image displayed in Photoshop with color-management.  There is no getting around this, because the sRGB profile is not equivalent to the monitor profile.  Do not expect them to look the same.
    It's hard, without being there and seeing what you're seeing, to judge whether your sRGB images are undersaturated compared to what's seen on other monitors.  I do know, as one with sRGB monitors myself, that images can look quite vibrant and alive in the sRGB color space.
    What we can't know is whether your judgment that your color-managed sRGB images are undersaturated is correct in an absolute sense, or whether you're just feeling the difference between seeing them on your monitor in non-color-managed apps and Photoshop.
    Photoshop normally does its color management like this:  It combines the information from the color profile in your document with the color profile of the monitor, which it retrieves from a standard place in Windows, and creates a transform used to display the colors.
    To have it do this you would NOT want the Proof Colors setting enabled.  It is the default behavior.
    -Noel
    P.S., I don't recall whether DPP is color-managed, but you might consider using Photoshop's raw converter, which definitely shows color-managed output, per the settings I described above.
    P.P.S.,  Your calibrator/profiler should have put the monitor profile in the proper place and set all the proper stuff up in Windows.  Is it specifically listed as compatible with the version of Windows you're running?

Maybe you are looking for