Validation for MIRO

I want" Bussines area & Section Code "
So i created the validation for all vendor transaction ie. FB60,F-43,F-48 & MIRO.
Validation is based on
Tcode & Account type
But i m not getting the compulsory field for MIRO.
For all other transation i m getting the right validation.
Then Why it doesnt take for MIRO?
What will be the sollution for that?
Plz tell me.

Hi,
Do you want to subsittute the GSBER in tax line item in MIRO?
if yes, then it works as design.In general taxes should not be
posted with business area as per note 199886. Therefore GSBER
is coded to be deleted when postings do not happen directly in FI.
Due to technical reasons the logic for postings directly in FI
(such as FB60) differs: There would be no deletion.
I recommend not to substitute the business area for tax items
(to be conform with note 199886) but if you really want to do this in
general you can implement the following modification on your own risk:
function FI_SUBST_GSBER
      ELSE.
      If GSBER differs -> mark as not unique
        IF gsber_tab-gsber <> t_accit-gsber.
          CLEAR gsber_tab-flg_unique.
          MODIFY gsber_tab INDEX sy-tabix.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>START-OF-DELETION>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
      IF t_accit-taxit = xon AND t_accit-xbilk = xon.
        IF brazil IS INITIAL.   "do not clear for brazil "note 436374
          CLEAR t_accit-gsber.
          MODIFY t_accit.
        ENDIF.                                            "note 436374
      ENDIF.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>END-OF-DELETION>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Hope the above informations can help to you!
Best Regards,

Similar Messages

Validation for Business place and section for With holding tax

Dear friends
I defined validation for MIRO with respect to Business place and Section code to make mandatory, it is working fine.
But in case of F-47 / F-48 and FB60 I defined validation but not working.
Please help me in this regard
Thanks in advance
Kiran A

Hi
Your query is not clear? What is the prerequisite and check you have defined in validation rule? I doubt that in prerequisite you have defined the T Code MIRO. Pls check and assing the other T Codes also if that is the case.
Regards
Sanil K Bhandari

Validations for FB70, FB75 and FB60, MIRO without Tax Codes

Hi,
can u help on the below issue.
I want to restrict the users while posting(FB70, FB75 and FB60, MIRO) without tax codes, please provide Validations for the same.
Block AR/AP for postings without tax code - AR is FB70 and FB75 - AP is FB 60 and MIRO
Thanks&regards,
Rajesh

Hi,
Please check below validations for FB60 AND MIRO ,FB70 AND FB75
Prerequisite
BKPF-BUKRS = 'xxxx' AND SYST-TCODE = 'FB60'
OR SYST-TCODE = 'FB75' OR SYST-TCODE = 'FB70'
OR SYST-TCODE = 'MIRO'
Check
BSEG-MWSKZ
Please check ,
NARESH

User exit/BADI to have a validation in MIRO for item level

Hi Experts,
My requirement is to do a validation in MIRO (Invoice Verification) transaction, when the user enters the PO details ( T.code - MIRO ) and if the material group in the line item belongs to specific set of material groups, then I want to show a popup stating to choose a different GL account.I am searching for a suitable User exit to implement the above change which I have mentioned. So Could you please suggest me any User exit or BADI Which can be used to incorporate my changes.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Srinivas

Hi,
check this thread:
BADI IN MIRO
Best regards.

Validation for duplicate AP invoice

We would like to prevent duplicate AP invoices from being posted through FB60.   We created an FI validation in OB28 in which the prerequisite = Tcode FB60, and the check is a user exit to check the values in vendor / company code / reference fields and if those 3 fields have the same values as in an existing document, to generate an error message preventing the duplicate document from being posted.
The above works well for creating new invoices.   However, when we have to make changes to an existing invoice (created through FB60), the system also calls on that validation and generates the error message, even though the only fields we can change on the invoice is payment terms, payment method, payment method supplement and text.
Other than modifying the user exit, does anybody know of a better way to do this validation or to prevent duplicate manual invoice from being created?
thank you.

This has already been answered before so extracted part of the reply
there are two duplicate checks in SAP:
1. the one for FI documents, this is relevant for all F... postings (but nor for MIRO!)
this can be turned off or on (in vendor master record) and 6 fields are checked:
Check Flag for Double Invoices or Credit Memos
Indicator which means that incoming invoices and credit memos are checked for double entries at the time of entry.
Use
Checking Logistics documents
Firstly, the system checks whether the invoice documents have already been entered in the Logistics invoice verification; the system checks invoices that are incorrect, or invoices that were entered for invoice verification in the background.
Checking FI documents
The system then checks whether there are FI or Accounting documents that were created with the original invoice verification or the Logistics verification, and where the relevant criteria are the same.
Checking Logistics documents
In checking for duplicate invoices, the system compares the following characteristics by default:
Vendor
Currency
Company code
Gross amount of the invoice
Reference document number
Invoice document date
If all of these characteristics are the same, the system issues a message that you can customize.
When you enter credit memos or subsequent adjustments, the system does not check for duplicate invoices.
Exception: Country-specific solution for Argentina, where invoices and credit memos are checked for duplicate documents.
No message is issued if you enter a document that has previously been reversed.
Dependencies
The system only checks for duplicate invoices in Materials Management if you enter the reference document number upon entering the invoice.
In Customizing for the Logistics invoice verification, you can specify that the following characteristics should not be checked:
Reference document number
Invoice document date
Company code
This means that you can increase the likelihood that the system will find a duplicate invoice, because you can reduce the number of characteristics checked.
Example
The following document has already been entered and posted:
Reference document number: 333
Invoice date: 04/28/00
Gross invoice amount: 100.00
Currency: EUR
Vendor: Spencer
Company code: Munich
You have made the following settings in Customizing:
The field "Reference document number" and "Company code" are deselected, which means that these characteristics will not be checked.
Now you enter the following document:
Reference document number: 334
Invoice date: 04/28/00
Gross invoice amount: 100.00
Currency: EUR
Vendor: Spencer
Company code: Berlin
Result
Because you entered a reference document when you entered the invoice, the system checks for duplicate invoices.
The reference document number and the company code are different from the invoice entered earlier, but these characteristics are not checked due to the settings you have made in Customizing.
All other characteristics are the same. As a result, the system issues a message that a duplicate entry has been made.
If the "Reference document number" had been selected in Customizing, the system would have checked the document and discovered that it was different from the invoice entered earlier, so it would not have issued a message.
Checking FI documents
Depending on the entry in the field "Reference", one of the following checks is carried out:
1. If a reference number was specified in the sequential invoice/credit memo, the system checks whether an invoice/credit memo has been posted where all the following attributes agree:
Company code
Vendor
Currency
Document date
Reference number
2. If no reference number was specified in the sequential invoice/credit memo, the system checks whether an invoice/credit memo has been posted where all the following attributes agree:
Company code
Vendor
Currency
Document date
Amount in document currency
2. the one for LIV.
this can be customized (as stated above) and is relevant for MIRO (and not for F... postings!).
Company, Reference and Invoice date
Set Check for Duplicate Invoices
In this step, you can configure for each company code if the system is to check for duplicate invoices when you enter invoices.
This check should prevent incoming invoices being accidentally entered and paid more than once.
You can choose whether to activate or deactivate the check criteria of company code, reference document number and invoice date for each company code. The more criteria that you activate, the lower the probability of the system finding a duplicate invoice. The Accounting documents are checked first, followed by documents from Logistics Invoice Verification (only incorrect invoices or those entered for verification in the background).
When checking duplicate invoices, the system compares the following
attributes in the standard system:
Vendor
Currency Company code
Gross invoice amount Reference document number
1. Invoice date If the system finds an invoice that matches all attributes, the system
displays a customizable message.
If you are entering credit memos, subsequent debits, or subsequent
credits, the system does not check for duplicate invoices.
The exception is the Argentina country version, where the system checks
for duplicate invoices and credit memos.
If a previously processed document is later cancelled and then entered
again, no message is displayed.
Requirements
The system only checks for duplicate invoices in Materials Management
if you specify a reference document number when entering the invoice.
In Customizing (IMG) for Invoice Verification, you can specify that the
system check the following attributes

Create a validation for check double invoice

Hi,
I have read here on SDN for check double invoice on reference number. We want to create an warning message if same reference number is posted twice, not depending on invoice date. So if I, on 1st of October have posted an invoice with reference number 123 and then want to post with same reference number on 2nd of October I want to have an warning message. If I had understand right I need to make a validation for that. Is it true that I need to have a programmer to do that or how am I doing (one thread said that this was the solution, see; )?
I suppose that my prerequisite will look as follows:
BKPF-BLART = 'KR' OR BKPF-BLART = 'RE' (I want the check when entering both an invoice in FB60 and MIRO)
How will my "check step" look like when I want to check if this reference has been entered before? Please describe in technical name.
Is it possible to do a validation for getting a warning, or is it just possible with error message?
I have also tried to change in IMG, in Material management > Logistics Invoice Verification > Incoming invoice > Set check for Duplicate invoices. Here we have all fields selected (check co. code, check reference, check inv. date). I changed to just select check reference, but this doesn´t solved my problem.
Best regards Lisa

Hello Lisa,
Your first question,
Yes system does not check MIRO invoice while posting FB60 invoice. Because when you post invoice with using FB60 transaction, system check BSIP table for duplication. But when you post MIRO invoice system doesn't fill BSIP table.
So that your question answer is YES, you can register an invoice in MIRO with same reference without a warning.
Your second question,
BTE means Business Transaction Event. Those events are known as FI user-exit.
So that when you posting an invoice with using FB60, system triggered on BTE 00001110 as i said on my previous message.
I try to explain step by step how can you activate this BTE. But you need to ABAPer for giving warning message on this exit.
Call FIBF transaction -> Settings -> Products -> ...of a customer
Create a new line,
Product : ZXX
Text : BTE Products for FI Exit
Product active : tick checkbox.
Call SE37 for exit function and copy from FM SAMPLE_PROCESS_00001110 to ZFI_PROCESS_00001110. Then active your FM and go to FIBF transaction again.
FIBF -> Settings -> Process Modules -> ...of a customer
Define a new line.
Process : 00001120
Function Module : ZFI_PROCESS_00001110
Product : ZFI
And then you can some write ABAP code for validation and give warning message.
In this FM, If you don't want to check duplicate invoice for your cases you can set export parameter e_nostd = 'X'.
I hope it helps to you,
Regards,
Burak

User exit for MIRO

Hi friends
My requirement is to do some validation in MIRO when user will press the save button. For this I am using EXIT_SAPLMRMP_010 fm exit in LMR1M001enhancement. But the problem is when I am trying to validate that and show some messages it is not showing my error message and processing is still going on. Please suggest me how to show that message and stop the processing on that point. I am using ECC 5.0 version and already checked the BADI INVOICE_UPDATE but it is also not working.
regards
shiba dutta

Hi,
Put the breakpoint in each of the userexit that are provided and check whether processing is going at that step.
If it is so then put the logic in that userexit.
Exit Name           Description
LMR1M001            User exits in Logistics Invoice Verification
LMR1M002            Account grouping for GR/IR account maintenance
LMR1M003            Number assignment in Logistics Invoice Verification
LMR1M004            Logistics Invoice Verification: item text for follow-on docs
LMR1M005            Logistics Inv. Verification: Release Parked Doc. for Posting
LMR1M006            Logistics Invoice Verification: Process XML Invoice
MRMH0001            Logistics Invoice Verification: ERS procedure
MRMH0002            Logistics Invoice Verification: EDI inbound
MRMH0003            Logistics Invoice Verification: Revaluation/RAP
MRMN0001            Message output and creation: Logistics Invoice Verification
Regards,
Sonika

Differnce between BAPI and FM for MIRO

Hi All,
What is the difference between using the BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE or MRM_INVOICE_CREATE.
I have a situation where i need to use the CALL transaction of MIRO as i cannot use the BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE.
THough i have done a recording and was able to do simulation.. but i doubt whether that will work because i have not found a supporting answer for using CALL transaction approach for MIRO and even the SAP does not recommend it. Pl. advice.

Hi Avinash,
1. If u want to use,
   use BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE
(Do not use MRM_INVOICE_CREATE)
2. REASON
   The FM MRM_INVOICE_CREATE
   is used by the MIRO program in its code.
   BUT
   It calls this FM ONLY AFTER ALL
   SCREEN VALIDATIONS / LOGIC / BUSINESS VALIDATIONS
   have been done for the data entered by the user.
3. The FM MRM_INVOICE_CREATE
   will BLINDLY create the document
   without any validation!
4. BUT for your purpose,
   u don't want such blind thing to happend.
   U want the full functionality of MIRO
   with all validations and business logic.
5. BAPIs have been created by SAP
   for the same REASON.
6. If we use BAPI BLINDLY,
   then also,
   The system/BAPI will check
   ALL VALIDATIONS JUST LIKE MIRO TRANSACTION,
   and only after this strong checks,
   it will post the document.
7. If there are any errors/warnigns,
   the BAPI will give errors and not post the document,
where as the simple FM MRM_INVOICE_CREATE
won't give any warning or alert to the user
   and may post incorrect data(provided by our z program)
Hence, Go for BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE
Regards,
Amit M.

Validations for Business place

Hi Gur's
I have done the validation in my project for business place is mandatory, but it is controling only the f-43, and fb60 etc but it is not controlling th "MIRO"
The following condition i had given the validation
BSEG-KOART = 'K' AND BSEG-BUPLA = '' AND
BSEG-AUGBL = '' AND BSEG-KTOSL <> 'BUV' AND
BKPF-TCODE <> 'MIRO'
we have done the BAPI for MIRO tranasation , for sub contracts , it is any impact for this
Please suggest valuable solution for this issue.
Regards,

Hi,
Validation works only for the FI transactions and not the other transaction.
MIRO is MM transactions which flows the data to the FI and not the FI transaction.
Try the same scenario using the User exit: LMR1M001
VVR

Field Status Group For MIRO

Dear Friends
Pls say me where we can get the field status group for Miro header level where i got a problem to make the business area manditory.
Regards
Vinay Bhaskar

Hi vinay
for busienss place we can make the field mandatory thorugh validations it is not possible through FSG
Plz reward the point if it is useflull
Regards

User Exit or Badi for MIRO

Hi
I need add some validations to data entry in MIRO for send their respective error messages and stop data saving.
Does somebody knows some User Exit or Badi for make validations in MIRO ?
Regards
Frank

Hi,
you can use badi MRM_HEADER_CHECK. In order to put error message you can use function module
PROT_FILL.
* If there is any error do not allow posting
    DATA: gt_errtab    TYPE TABLE OF mrm_errprot,
          gs_errtab    TYPE mrm_errprot.
    CONSTANTS:     c_errprot(23)   TYPE c VALUE '(SAPLMRMF)TAB_ERRPROT[]'.
    FIELD-SYMBOLS: <fs_errprotj_dt> TYPE table.
    ASSIGN (c_errprot) TO <fs_errprotj_dt>.
    REFRESH gt_errtab[].
    gt_errtab[] = <fs_errprotj_dt>[].
    IF NOT gt_errtab[] IS INITIAL.
      READ TABLE gt_errtab INTO gs_errtab WITH KEY msgty = 'E'.
      IF sy-subrc = 0.
        DATA: c_okqx(17)   TYPE c VALUE '(SAPLMR1M)OK-CODE'.
        FIELD-SYMBOLS: <fs_okqx> TYPE ANY.
        ASSIGN (c_okqx) TO <fs_okqx>.
        CASE <fs_okqx>.
          WHEN 'BU'. "POST
* This is optional: you can either search for a particular message or
* do not allow any error message
* Here search for the message triggered in badi INVOICE UPDATE
            READ TABLE gt_errtab INTO gs_errtab WITH KEY msgty = 'E'
            msgid = 'ZXX' msgno = '030'.
            IF sy-subrc = 0.
              CLEAR <fs_okqx>.
              MESSAGE s030(zxx). "While errors exist document will not be posted
            ENDIF.
        ENDCASE.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
This is used to give error message in case before posting the document.
KR Jaideep,

Driver not valid for HP Pavilion dv6t

Need to update my Intel HD Graphic driver.
Tried HP and Intel and both are stating that the driver being installed is not validated for this computer. Please obtain the appropriate driver from the computer manufacture. Set up will exit.
Can anyone help? TY

@ls1313 ,
Hello and thank you for posting on the HP support forums. Here is the link to the only supported drivers for your notebook.
HP Pavilion dv6t-3000 CTO Entertainment Notebook PC
I hope this helps.
Have a great day and thank you for posting.
Please click the "Thumbs Up" on the bottom right of this post to say thank you if you appreciate the support I provide!
Also be sure to mark my post as “Accept as Solution" if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others who face the same challenge find the same solution.
D5GR
I work on behalf of HP

Validation for text field: Null and contains no spaces

Currently on APEX 3.2
I want to check 1 text field and 2 text areas to ensure they are not null and blank (hitting the space bar in the field) before submitting the page. How do I do both validations for on each field?

I created a validation with a type of 'Function Returning Boolean' and using the following code in the expression:
IF( TRIM( :P1_Text_Field) IS NULL
Or LTRIM( :P1_Text_Field ) != :P1_Text_Field )
THEN
RETURN false;
ELSE
RETURN true;
END IF;
Edited by: Jeremy_F on Apr 12, 2012 8:15 AM

When trying to update my Apps I am being advised my account is not valid for the UK, I must switch to the Ireland store. How do I do this?

When trying to update or purchase Apps I am being advised my account is not valid for the UK Store and I must switch to the IReland store. How do I do this?

Change App Store
1. Tap "Settings"
2. Tap "iTunes & App Stores"
3.Tap "View Apple ID"
4. Enter your user name and password.
5. Tap "Country/Region."
6. Tap "Change Country/Region"
7. Select the region where you will be located.
8. Tap "Done".

I have been using my Apple ID in India and recently i moved to Spain and now i can not see my indian apps.it says my apple ID is valid for only spanish store.how to download apps from Indian store being in Spain.

I have been using my Apple ID in India and recently i moved to Spain and now i can not see my indian apps.it says my apple ID is valid for only spanish store.how to download apps from Indian store being in Spain.

Did you try to change the location in Settings/iTunes & AppStore/AppleID -> view Apple ID, log in ->Country/Region -> India?

Validation for MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for