Values based on properties

can i select the value based on the properties of the particluar dimension.
plz see the below code:
*SELECT(%ENTITY1%,"[ENTITY]",INTCO,"[ID]"=%INTCO%)
*RUNALLOCATION
*FACTOR = -1
*DIM P_ACCT WHAT=311030,311036; WHERE=EP-111500
*DIM ENTITY WHAT=; WHERE=%ENTITY1%
*ENDALLOCATION
*COMMIT
Edited by: Anurodh Jindal on May 25, 2010 2:11 PM

I tried using REC statement, but that also is not working.
*XDIM_MEMBERSET ACTIVITY = NA
*XDIM_MEMBERSET P_DATASRC = INPUT
*XDIM_MEMBERSET RPTCURRENCY = DC
*XDIM_MEMBERSET MEASURES = PERIODIC
*WHEN P_ACCT
*IS "311030"
*REC(FACTOR = -1,ENTITY=INTCO.ENTITY)
*ENDWHEN
After running the package, it throws the error as:
RUN LOGIC: Property value not found
Edited by: Anurodh Jindal on May 26, 2010 9:06 AM

Similar Messages

Problem in populating lookup values based on the lookup query from database

HI all
I have problem of population look-up values based on look-up query
I am giving the details what i am trying
I need to populate the values from the UD_LDAP_USR table into the field of UD_USRGRPC_NisNetTriple of type lookup
i planned to set the properties of lookup as like this
look up query as select UD_LDAP_USR_COMMON_NAME as NisNetTriple from UD_LDAP_USR
ColumnNames as UD_LDAP_USR_COMMON_NAME
Column captions as UD_LDAP_USR_COMMON_NAME
Column width as 30
Lookup Column Name as UD_LDAP_USR_COMMON_NAME
But when i try to add ColumnName as wht i mentioned above i m getting invalid property exception,update failed
I am not sure about that are we able to use other Connector table prefix with UD into the another processFrom
Let me give update on this issue
Urgent,struck my work here
thanks
Nagaraj

Thanks for the reply raghav
I tried but it was not working
I gave like what u specified but no use
It is throwing exception like set look-up query for the field
Any one help me out on this issue
Edited by: Nagaraju Chowdary on Jan 21, 2013 3:41 AM
Edited by: Nagaraju Chowdary on Jan 21, 2013 3:42 AM

Creating multiple profiles, using unified profile types, to store multiple values for same properties

Hi All:
I am trying to create multiple profiles, using unified profile types, to
store multiple values for same properties. Here my intention of using
'unified profile types' is to create multiple profiles (to store multiple
values for a property). All the properties are stored in the same database
maintained by Personalization server. Also, I am trying to use the same
'USER' ejb as profile class/home/pk/jndi.
The scenerio is,
define unified profile types (Business, Vacation) using Personalization
admin tools, using com.beasys.commerce.axiom.contact.User,
com.beasys.commerce.axiom.contact.UserHome,
com.beasys.commerce.axiom.contact.UserPk,
com.beasys.commerce.axiom.contact.User for Profile Class, Home, Pk class,
JNDI name respectively.
Define Property set 'HotelCommerce' with property
HotelProp as single, restricted, text (valid values Single, Double)
Now you can use the attached jsp files to login as a user and try to set the
property value for HotelProp for each profile. As per my understanding, I
was expecting that I can set different values for the property 'HotelProp'
for each profiles. But unexpectedly, all the profiles get the same value.
Question. is it the correct behavior? if yes, how can I achieve this
functionality?
if not, do you see any problem in my scripts?
your answer asap is appreciated. we need to make decision on using
Personalization server v/s developing our own Personalization server!!!:)
thanks,
-rajesh
PS: I have tried 'Unified Profile Example' type too, but that did not work.
[propsettest.jsp]
[home.jsp]

I am trying to create multiple profiles, using unified profile types, to
store multiple values for same properties. Here my intention of using
'unified profile types' is to create multiple profiles (to store multiple
values for a property). All the properties are stored in the same database
maintained by Personalization server. Also, I am trying to use the same
'USER' ejb as profile class/home/pk/jndi.Hello Rajesh,
This is not the purpose of the UUP. The UUP is used to allow existing
database schemas to be aggregated with the existing Weblogic Personalization
Server database schema to provide a single, customized user profile with which
to maintain the user properties (
http://e-docs.bea.com/wlcs/p13n/users.htm#1068901 )
If you want to have properties that change value based on some "profile" or
classification of a user, then you should use classifier rules to change the
user from "OnVacation" to "AtWork" or "AtHome". You can use these classifier
rules to select content for the user or conditionally execute logic (
http://e-docs.bea.com/wlcs/p13n/rules.htm )
Ture Hoefner
BEA Systems, Inc.
1655 Walnut Street; suite 200
Boulder, CO 80302
www.beasys.com

Reading cache values from iView properties

Hi,
I want to programmatically retrieve the value of an iView's cache properties.
I was thinking of retrieving this the normal way, using the attributes of the IPcdContext object.
This works for most attributes, for instance:
pcdContext.getAttributes("").get("com.sap.portal.pcm.Title");
however, the attribute names used for cache -- ALLOW_BROWSER, CachingLevel, and ValidityPeriod -- don't seem to return anything...
How can I retrieve these settings?
Thanks in advance!

Hi,
If they are not set from PropertyEditor and left to the default values, then these properties are not set on the PCDObject. So when you retrieve these attributes you get null. The PropertyEditor uses the same logic, but when nothing found, it shows default values. So from PropertyEditor you see them, but from API you get null.
You can inspect this behavior by opening the PCDObject with PCDInspector and check all available attributes. Then you will see that attributes ALLOW_BROWSER, CachingLevel, and ValidityPeriod do not exist.
Greetings,
Praveen Gudapati
[Points are welcome for helpful answers]

Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S)

Dear all,
There is this field in mateial master called "Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S)" in accounting view 1,
1 - May I know what is this field about (in between our company using material ledger).
2 - May I know why the value of this field are different between our company period 6 and period 7 for this year? what contribute to it? and is it something wrong with different value between two different period or absolutely normal?
Thanks.
Tuff

Dear all,
Does anyone know my question?
Thanks,
tuff

Value based on the periodic unit price(only with pr.ctrl S) field in MatMas

Dear all,
There is this field in mateial master called "Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S)" in accounting view 1,
1 - May I know what is this field about (in between our company using material ledger).
2 - May I know why the value of this field are different between our company period 6 and period 7 for this year? what contribute to it? and is it something wrong with different value between two different period or absolutely normal?
Thanks.
Tuff

Hi Tuffy,
For your 1st query:
PUP field in Accounting 1 (if ML is active, Price Determination indicator=3) is the result of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) closing entry.
For your 2nd query:
In most of the cases the values will be different in Previous Period and Current Period. e.g.Period 6 values are the results of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) in 1st week of Period 6 for Previous Period (i.e. Period 5). Period 7 values are the results of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) in 1st week of Period 7 for Previous Period (i.e. Period 6).
The reason for the different values: Price differences, Exchange rate differences, Price/Exchange rate differences from Low lower materials, etc.
Thanks & Regards,
ADI

Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S) field in mat.

Dear all,
There is this field in mateial master called "Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S)" in accounting view 1,
1 - May I know what is this field about (in between our company using material ledger).
2 - May I know why the value of this field are different between our company period 6 and period 7 for this year? what contribute to it? and is it something wrong with different value between two different period or absolutely normal?
Thanks.
Tuff

Hi Tuffy,
For your 1st query:
PUP field in Accounting 1 (if ML is active, Price Determination indicator=3) is the result of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) closing entry.
For your 2nd query:
In most of the cases the values will be different in Previous Period and Current Period. e.g.Period 6 values are the results of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) in 1st week of Period 6 for Previous Period (i.e. Period 5). Period 7 values are the results of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) in 1st week of Period 7 for Previous Period (i.e. Period 6).
The reason for the different values: Price differences, Exchange rate differences, Price/Exchange rate differences from Low lower materials, etc.
Thanks & Regards,
ADI

Preaggregation across value based hierarchy dimension in 11g

Hi All,
I have created a cube with 6 dimensions in olap 11g. One of those six dimensions has only one hierarchy which is value based hierarchy. I have chosen level based aggregation as I know at what levels exactly users are going to query. When I was going through the dimensions to choose levels to preaggregate I noticed there were no options available for my value based hierarchy dimension ( I could see "all" option for the same case in 10g) then I tried to look for definitions of underlying objects just to make sure it will preaggregate data across my value based hierarchy dimension.
I found value set corresponding to my value based hierarchy dimension in <CUBE NAME>SOLVEAGGMAP object , which AWM uses to decide which dimension values to preaggregate but if I do rpr on that value set (rp r<CUBE NAME>SOLVE<DIMENSION NAME>_PVSET) it shows NA so my question is can I pre aggregate across value based hierarchy dimension in olap 11g?
Olap Version: 11.2.0.1
AWM version: 11.2.0.1
Thanks

Even if you know exactly which levels your users will query, percent based precompute (e.g. 30%) may still be faster in practice because queries are returned using 'sparse looping' instead of 'dense looping'. This was the single biggest performance advantage of 11g over 10g.
But if you still want to use level based precompute, then you should look at the XML template for the cube (as saved by AWM, for example). In it you should find something called PrecomputeCondition. This defines the set of members that are precomputed. Here is an example I just created using the GLOBAL schema
<PrecomputeCondition>
<![CDATA[
"TIME" LEVELS ("TIME"."MONTH", "TIME".CALENDAR_QUARTER, "TIME".CALENDAR_YEAR),
CHANNEL LEVELS (CHANNEL.TOTAL_CHANNEL, CHANNEL.CHANNEL),
CUSTOMER LEVELS (CUSTOMER.MARKET_SEGMENT, CUSTOMER.REGION, CUSTOMER.SHIP_TO),
PRODUCT LEVELS (PRODUCT.CLASS, PRODUCT.FAMILY, PRODUCT.ITEM)]]>
</PrecomputeCondition>The PrecomputeCondition is also visible through the USER_CUBES view.
SELECT PRECOMPUTE_CONDITION
FROM USER_CUBES
WHERE CUBE_NAME = 'MY_CUBE';You can hand modify this condition in the XML to specify an alternative 'non level based' precompute condition for any dimension. For example, if you define an attribute named 'SHOULD_PRECOMPUTE' on your PRODUCT dimension that is 1 for members to be precomputed and 0 for all others, then you can change the condition as follows.
<PrecomputeCondition>
<![CDATA[
"TIME" LEVELS ("TIME"."MONTH", "TIME".CALENDAR_QUARTER, "TIME".CALENDAR_YEAR),
CHANNEL LEVELS (CHANNEL.TOTAL_CHANNEL, CHANNEL.CHANNEL),
CUSTOMER LEVELS (CUSTOMER.MARKET_SEGMENT, CUSTOMER.REGION, CUSTOMER.SHIP_TO),
PRODUCT WHERE PRODUCT.SHOULD_PRECOMPUTE = 1]]>
</PrecomputeCondition>If you recreate the cube from the XML with this condition, then the PVSET valueset you discovered should contain all dimension members for which the attribute value is 1. This gives you complete control over what is precomputed. Note that AWM doesn't support this form of condition, so it won't show up if you go to the Precompute tab, but it is valid for the server. The PL/SQL below will modify the PrecomputeCondition (for the cube named MYCUBE) without going through AWM.
begin
dbms_cube.import_xml(q'!
<Metadata
Version="1.3"
MinimumDatabaseVersion="11.2.0.2">
<Cube Name="MY_CUBE">
 <Organization>
 <AWCubeOrganization>
 <PrecomputeCondition>
 <![CDATA[
 "TIME" LEVELS ("TIME"."MONTH","TIME".CALENDAR_QUARTER, "TIME".CALENDAR_YEAR),
 CHANNEL LEVELS (CHANNEL.TOTAL_CHANNEL,CHANNEL.CHANNEL),
 CUSTOMER LEVELS (CUSTOMER.MARKET_SEGMENT,CUSTOMER.REGION,CUSTOMER.SHIP_TO),
 PRODUCT WHERE PRODUCT.SHOULD_PRECOMPUTE = 1]]>
 </PrecomputeCondition>
 </AWCubeOrganization>
 </Organization>
</Cube>
</Metadata>
end;
/

Value based hierarchy 11g question

Hi,
in my BMM i've created a level based hierarchy composed of two levels: TOTAL and Audiologist
Total level is setted as Grand Total level and doesn't have logical columns.
At audiologist level insted i drag and drop two logical columns: Audiologist Code and Audiologist Name
Then i created two keys.
First Key: Audiologist Code - Use to display: None
Second Key: Audiologist Code and Audiologist Name - Use to display : YES
Graphically my hierarchy is as follow:
Total-----
Audiologist
Audiologist Code
Audiologist Name
Now i would like that if i drill down Total appear simultaneously two columns: Audiologist Code and Audiologist Name.
Is it possible? I remember that in 10 it was.
It's quite urgent.
Thanks

Based on my experience of OWB10gR2 the option to create a "Value Based" hierarchy is only enabled if you create an AW based OLAP model. If you want to create a ROLAP model then I do not think this is possible.
Question is why create a ROLAP model when you could get better performance and more powerful analytical features by using a multidimensional model within an analytic workspace.
Keith

How to get ATINN value based on material number and Class Type ?

I have below SELECT stmt code which gives the correct value of atwrt based on materil no and ATINN.
However in quality system, it is failing because in quality system "atinn" value is not 0000000381. It is different.
So how can I get ATINN(Internal characteristic) value based on material number and Class Type?
-Obtain the batch characterstic value for the Material******************
SELECT atwrt
    UP TO 1 ROWS
    INTO v_charvalue
    FROM ausp
   WHERE objek = mcha-matnr
     AND atinn = '0000000381'   " 'US80_FRENCH_ON_LABEL'
     AND klart = '001'.
THANKS N ADVANCE.

Hi SAm,
use the Below function module to get the Atinn for Atwrt for thr Class and MAterial combination..
CALL FUNCTION 'CLAF_CLASSIFICATION_OF_OBJECTS'
      EXPORTING
        classtype          = '023'       "Class type
        object             = w_object "Material number with Leading zeros
        no_value_descript = 'X'      "Default X
        objecttable        = 'MCH1'    "Table name Mara or MCH1 or MARC
      TABLES
        t_class            = t_class   "It return the Batch class available for the above combination
        t_objectdata       = t_char "Return Batch characteristics(ATWRT) and their value ATINN in this table
      EXCEPTIONS
        no_classification = 1
        no_classtypes      = 2
        invalid_class_type = 3
        OTHERS             = 4.
Regards,
Prabhudas

Can a Deployment Plan Modify Values in a .properties file?

I'm using JDeveloper 11.1.1.6.0 and Weblogic 10.3
I am currently in the process of creating a plan.xml file for our application, but we have a few properties files that contain configuration information. This information needs to change depending on the environment that we are deploying to. Is it possible to do this through a plan.xml or would we have to use some other method?
Example:
File: conf.properties
------start file-----
A=1
B=2
C=3
-----end file-----
We would need to be able to change the value of B to be 5 instead of 2 if we are deploying to our test environment.

As far as I can tell, what you linked is just using the deployment plan's XPath to update a value in the web.xml which is standard procedure. However, I am curious of being able to update values in a .properties file which is not an XML file, and thus can't be read by XPath. Is this possible or can the deployment plans only modify XML documents?
[EDIT] From what I've been finding it seems I've confirmed that it can only override XML files, or atleast I've found no indications that it can do anything other than XML files. Though now I'm having issues of it overriding custom XML files. EG: I have a wf_client_config.xml file in the WAR's class path that I need to update depending on the environment, but have not been able to have the deployments recognize the override that I have listed in the plan.xml.
So I guess now my question is, do I ened to do anything special to get it to recognize an XML file on the class path vs a standard xml file such as web.xml? Or should I make this a new topic?
Edited by: mBaldwin on Jan 8, 2013 11:45 AM
[EDIT 2] Marking this as resolved, it appears as though the plan.xml will only modify settings that could be modified by Weblogic naturally and it is not able to modify items that are on the classpath of the application.
Edited by: mBaldwin on Feb 26, 2013 12:08 PM

Parent-child hierarchy (Value based hierarchy)

As anyone created a parent-child hierarchy using Oracle Warehouse Builder or Analytic Workspace Manager. I am using Oracle 10g Rel2 (and AWM) and OWB 10g Rel2.
The values in the dimension table defines the hierarchy.
I don't see an option of creating a value-based hierarchy in OWB though it is mentioned that it supports this particular hierarchy.
In AWM, I am able to create the hierarchy but when I try to view the data in the dimension it gives an error BIB-9531 Invalid hierarchy specified.
Can you please let me know if I am missing something.
Thanks a lot in advance!
Regards,
Maruthi

I've done some work with this, and it hasn't been easy going. There is no built-in ability to form a hierarchy of measure columns, at least nothing that can be predefined as the drill for a fact column. For example: I have 220 details of expense that have an exact arrangement with 5 levels and subtotals. Besides the expense detail there are say 4 dimensions, so the expense detail would be the 5th dimension. I have both arrangements in my rpd: 4D and 5D. They can be used together or separately. The 4D basically has 1000's of measures and there is no relationship between them besides the display arrangement in Answers. The 5D has a 5 column dimension that can drill the expense column from Total_Expense down to the 220 rows of detail expense.

Value based hierarchy (parent-child)

Does anybody have any experience in modeling a parent-child dimension ( value based hierarchy instead of level based ) in OBIEE?
Swapan.

I've done some work with this, and it hasn't been easy going. There is no built-in ability to form a hierarchy of measure columns, at least nothing that can be predefined as the drill for a fact column. For example: I have 220 details of expense that have an exact arrangement with 5 levels and subtotals. Besides the expense detail there are say 4 dimensions, so the expense detail would be the 5th dimension. I have both arrangements in my rpd: 4D and 5D. They can be used together or separately. The 4D basically has 1000's of measures and there is no relationship between them besides the display arrangement in Answers. The 5D has a 5 column dimension that can drill the expense column from Total_Expense down to the 220 rows of detail expense.

Value based Hierarchies

Hello,
Has anyone created a parent-child hierarchy using Oracle Warehouse Builder or Analytic Workspace Manager. I am using Oracle 10g Rel2 (and AWM) and OWB 10g Rel2.
The values in the dimension table defines the hierarchy.
I don't see an option of creating a value-based hierarchy in OWB though it is mentioned that it supports this particular hierarchy.
In AWM, I am able to create the hierarchy but when I try to view the data in the dimension it gives an error BIB-9531 Invalid hierarchy specified.
Can you please let me know if I am missing something.
Thanks a lot in advance!
Regards,
Maruthi

To create a value based hierarchy:
define the storage as MOLAP, as a minimum create 2 attributes one for the dimension member (define as business in Identifier column), one for the parent member referenece (define as parent in Identifier column), the hierarchy will have no levels. If you add this dimension into a map, you should have a mapping port for both the dimension member and the parent reference. The dimension will use 'Use natural keys from data source'.
There is an expert for simplifying some of this, not sure on when it will be made available on OTN, it drives the creation of the dimensional objects from tables/views etc..

Set default value based on current day value and setItems in Design studio

Hello
I have 2 filters on my dashboard - year and month. The default display of the dashboard should populate current year data. Is it possible to create formula to populate dynamic default value based on the current date using setSelectedValue() ?
Also, for the calendar month, the items are set as below
DD_MONTH.setItems(DS_1.getMemberList("0CALMONTH",
MemberPresentation.INTERNAL_KEY, MemberDisplay.TEXT, 12, "ALL");
This displays month values as 01/2014, 02/2014 ... How can I change these value to display as January if mm = 01 and February if mm = 02 etc..
Thanks
Sirisha

Hi Victor,
I have tried using below statment to populate current year as the default selection value for the dropdown. Used it on Startup, but for some reason it loads all the data when the dashboard is opened the first time. Any ideas?
DS_1.setFilter("0CALYEAR",[Convert.subString(APPLICATION.getInfo().dateNowInternalFormat, 4,6)]);
Thanks
Sirisha

Values based on properties

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for