VAX and VAY

HI experts,
I know that this question has been asked many times before, but after going through many threads, i still have some questions regarding these two. As to my knowledge, VAX is used when we do not use Sales Order as cost object, and VAY is the other way around.
My questions are:
- what are the effects of using cogs as cost element?
- if i am using sales order cost estimate with valuated stock, but the sales order is NOT cost object itself (account category M, valuation M), does the system automatically choose VAY instead of VAX? I have tried to find the answer to this issue, but most of the sources i found said that it will choose VAX.
i have check the requirement class, but as i see it, no requirement class used make the sales order as cost object, and the cogs account itself is not a cost element
Any help is really appreciated. Thanks

Hi Erwin
Your situation is pretty strange
Other pointers could be
1. Post the transaction with GBB VAY... See what movement type is used in the transaction.. Go to OMJJ and see what account modifier is assigned against that movement type... Possibility of some one changing it can not be ruled out
2. Remove your GBB VAY account from OBYC for the time being and see what error the system gives.. Does it still refer to GBB VAY?? This will give you true indicator as to what the system is looking for
If it does not give error, it would mean that it is taking GL account from some other key... in that case, you will have to check whereelse the COGS (Cost Ele) GL is assigned in OBYC
3. I assume the req type KSL is showing in your sales order and Acct Assgn Catg is also blank in your req class (as you said it is a clean screen).. So, nothing on this front to be checked....
Regards
Ajay M

Similar Messages

Account Determination VAX and VAY

Hi All,
VAX: for goods issues for sales orders without
account assignment object (the account is not a cost element)?
VAY: for goods issues for sales orders with
account assignment object (account is a cost element)?
Can any one explain me about VAX and VAY postings?where we use VAX account determination and where we use VAY account determination?
Thanks,
Rau

Here are a couple of things that I gathered from here and there - could be of some help.
Cost of goods sold in case of 'make to stock' is not a cost element - this would be VAX, whereas the same COGS is a cost element in case of 'make to order', so VAY.
Here is the link for another business scenario where VAX and VAY are explained with an example.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/a2/80d9947a6311d3a6f000104b55d538/content.htm

Error in account deteremination for GBB and VAY

Dear All,
We have implemented the Costing based COPAand while posting the PGI we are getting the follwing error.
" Account determination for entry GBB ,VAY 3000 is not possible"
How to resolve this problem w/o creating cost element for COGS
Whether we should update GBB and VAY through OBYC or any steps
Please help us.
Regards,
Vishwanath

Hi Ajay,
Sorrry for late. I have gone thorugh and checked what u said to check. But still problem remain unsolved. Please clarfiy the followings.
1) Whether we need to create the cost element for COGS to resolve the above problem.
2) If we create the cost element, is it possible to get the cost breakup (as per cost comp structure) in COPA
3) Is there any impact in costing / Accounts, if we create cost element for COGS.
4)Any other steps to be taken to flow the Cost breap up in COPA.
Thnaks in advance.
Regards,
Vishwanath

OBYC : Offsetting entry for stock posting (GBB) , VAX/ VAY

Dear Sapients,
Could you please tell me the difference of the account grouping VAX and VAY for GBB(Offsetting entry for stock posting)
SAP helps says:
VAX: for goods issues for sales orders without
account assignment object (the account is not a cost element)
VAY:for goods issues for sales orders with
account assignment object (account is a cost element)
But truly i still did not understand, could you pls explaing.
In my current scenario system asked me to maintain an entry for VAY, when we are trying to reverse a delivery(inter company) created for PO.
Thanks and Regards
Ravi

Dear Ravikanth
Account grouping code VAX is relevant when the sales order item does not carry costs and revenues. If the sales order item carries costs and revenues, account grouping code VAY is used.
Thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

OBYC--Difference Vax & Vay

Dear Gurus,
Can you pls tell me the difference between Vax and Vay.In SAP help its given that:
VAX: for goods issues for sales orders without account assignment object (the account is not a cost element)
VAY: for goods issues for sales orders with account assignment object (account is a cost element)
Please can any one expalin me with example.I have checked in my present system for SFgoods Vax--is created under misc income account group and Vay is created as clearing account.
But for Finished Goods both are Clearing account.Actually thaere are some new materials for whicl val class needs to be defined I am unable to decide on the GLs for Vax and vay.
Pls help.
Regards
Raju

Hi
Give me perfect Scenario.
Regards,
Sagar.

Consumption and goods issue

Dear all,
I see that consumption is cost element whereas goods issue is non cost element.
In GBB transaction code, VAX is goods issue where VAY is consumption.
May I know why there is a difference between consumption and goods issue? I read the post on vax and vay but from business view, why consumption can go to copa whereas goods issue cannot go to copa?
Thanks

Hi
Goods issue account(Inventory related account) is balace sheet account normally we will not crate a balance sheet accounts as a cost element .
Please also refer the below mentioned link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/en/08/5144a943b511d182b30000e829fbfe/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/12/1a39516e36d1118b3f0060b03ca329/content.htm
Hope this will helpful for you
Regards
Praveen PC

Accounting Document not generated after Post goods issue in delivery order.

Dear Experts
Greeting of the daays,
Need your help on below issue.
After making the post goods issue ,the system is not making the accounting document.
The error given by the system is as follows:
Material document 12365 does not include an accounting document
Diagnosis
The system cannot find an accounting document for the material document 12365.
Possible reasons for this are:
The goods movement has no relevance to accounting. Therefore, the system did not generate an accounting document for the material document.
The material document is a document that was posted before Release 2.1. Such documents must be converted so that the system can find the relevant accounting document.
The procedure for the subsequent calculation of value is not active in your system. For further information, refer to the documentation on the program for valuating goods movements: RM07MWBU.
__Solution what I tried to solve this issue ,but not successful.__
__Solution 1- maintain OMS2__
__Solution 2 - maintain OMJJ- movement type 601 - PRCTR is required entry.__
__Solution 3 - price maintain is material master.__
__Solution 4 - OBYC - BSX - 7920 - GLA/c and GBB- VAX and VAY - 7920 GLA/c.__
__Pls let me know if there is any confirgation is missing.__

Hi
Do this checks:
In tcode OBYC check if you have the proper entries.
Go to tcode OKB9 and do the settings for the G/L acc. that you have in OBYC.
To populate PRCTR you can use OKB9 and you can check if you have values in MARC-PRCTR.
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo

Different COGS GL Account for Sample Material delivery

Dear All,
Sometime customer is selling their regular finished product as Free Sample, but User want different COGS GL Account whenever he posts PGI for Free Sample material. I checked Split valuation functionality as posted in the forum, but our case finished material managed in the batches and price indicator is S. Appreciate your advice to cater this requirement.
Thanks & Regards,
Santosh

Hi,
Option - 1.
Try testing with GBB - VAX and VAY general modification key. You need to take care of Cost elements for the GL account assigned. VAX not a cost element and VAY with cost element.
Option - 2.
You may have a utility which can run as a background job, which transfers the Standard COGS to Sample COGS account for the specific delivery type (only for sample Delivery document type).
Option - 3.
This is too lengthy for this requirement. You might need to create a customer specific movement type.
Thanks
Krish.
Thanks
Krish.

Copy of 601 movement type without reference to delivery

I have created new movement type as 901(copy from 601 movement type) in OMJJ. I want to use this 901 movement without reference to delivery in my project. In Account grouping and update control-Movement indicator L is available. But entry is in freeze mode so I am not able to remove movement indicator L. So please guide me how can I achieve this? Is there any way?
I have made copy of 231 movement. but problem is in case of 601, we can maintain VAX account in case of non consumption posting and VAY in case of consumption posting. But in 231 movement this facility/such record not available to maintain both VAX and VAY. My company is using both VAX and VAY. So in both case( 231 and 601), I have to change/create records of movement combinations. So please suggest keeping this thing into consideration.
Pl. help.
Vijay

Still waiting for an answer.
Vijay

Is a BOM always necessary?

Hey Guru's
Is it necessary to have a BOM when you use ETO? What happens if you don't?
If you don't use a BOM in ETO then how do you know what to take out of the inventory?
Is there a difference on how SAP uses the BOM in MTO, ETO, Disc. manu, rep. manu and Process industries?
If it is not necessary to use the BOM, what is then used, and what is the significance of that?
Sincerely
Nina

Hi Nina,
I thought this mighht be useful to you.
It was compiled from a lot of helpful people from here and other sites.
Please let us kno wwhen we can be of any assistance.
What is the difference between MD04 and MD05?
MD04 Transaction shows the actual Stock/Requirement situation while MD05 shows the situation at the time of the last MRP run. That date is also displayed on the screen.
Validation of Accounting Document Type in MIRO
Check in User Exit EXIT_SAPLMR1M_004 (Enhancement LMR1M001).
Source of Supply Determination during PR Creation
Check in User Exit EXIT_SAPLMEQR_001 which is called in the ME_SEARCH_SOURCE_OF_SUPPLY. For further details, check in Question 6 of OSS Note 457110.
Source of Supply Determination during PR Creation
Check in User Exit EXIT_SAPLMEQR_001 which is called in the ME_SEARCH_SOURCE_OF_SUPPLY. For further details, check in Question 6 of OSS Note 457110.
Source List Maintenance without Info Record
To avoid the maintenance of source list maintenance without info record, make sure the Message Number 06 341 shall be set as 'E'.
Services PO on hold
It is not possible for SAP to hold the Services PO. For further details, check in OSS Note 380296.
Pricing condition maintenance in Outline Agreement
If you would avoid any change in the pricing conditions of the outline agreement during maintainance in Transaction ME31K, then make sure the Activity Code '3' shall be set for Authorization Object V_KONH_VKS.
PR Document Type Determination when converting planned order
It is of the SAP standard functionality that only 'NB' Document Type is assigned to the PR during conversion of planned order into purchase requisition. For further details, check in OSS Note 46919.
PR Document Type Determination during MRP run
The Document Type determination for the PR is made during MRP run using the MRP Group via Transaction OPPZ.
PR Deletion while PO is active
To avoid the deletion of purchase requistion line items while the PO document (with reference to this PR line item) is active, make sure the Message Number 06 152 shall be set as 'E' via Transaction OME0. For further details, check in OSS Note 521174.
PR Creation with reference to Scheduling Agreement
PR can be created with reference to another PR and can't be created referring to a PO or Scheduling Agreement. PO & Scheduling are created and controlled by Purchasing Organizations. PR can be created by end-users. Yet, requisition will be generated referring to Scheduling agreement when MRP is run. In this case, source list must be maintained for that item-vendor combination & the MRP shall be properly set. Selection Parameter '2'.
PO Price Default from PR Price
Follow the OSS Note 393367 describing how to use the EFB settings to control the PR price coming into PO.
1. First, use Transaction Code OMET to set up the new function authorization for Buyer;
2. Tick on the 'Order Price Adoption' field.
3. Select the 'Maintain Users' to insert EFB into Parameter view.
PO Price Default from Material Master
If we wish to have the Price Determination to use the cost price from the Material Master as we create the Purchase Order, then create the new Condition Type (which could be based on the standard Base Condition PB00). This Condition Type must not have any Access Sequence assigned to it and must have the Condition Category 'G'. The Calculation Schema must have this new Condition Type as the first Condition Type (replacing PB00). For further information, check in OSS Note 496720.
PO Document Type Determination in ME59
The OSS Note 114213 details the determination of PO Document Type during automatic creation of purchase order from purchase requisition.
Planned Delivery Costs maintenance in the PO
If the planned delivery costs need to be assigned to material valuation, you just enter them under conditions for the specific material. However, if you need to assign the costs for defined account, you need to create an item line for the delivery costs and buy them as text for defined account assignment. Depending on acct. assignment specified for the item, you then fill in the needed accounts in item details, tab account assignments.
Multiple Functional Tips and Hints
0001 - FI/CO IMG - Configuration Menus
The following IMG Configuration Menus work on all versions up to 4.7 Enterprise:
ORK1 - Profit Center Accounting
ORKA - Internal Orders
ORKE - Profitability Analysis
ORK0 - General Controlling
ORKS - Cost Center Accounting
ORFB - FI
ORKL - Reconciliation Ledger
ORFA - Asset Management
These Tcode will open IMG/Configuration related menus.
MRP Area Set Up Configuration
The MRP Area is purposely used if we would like to control the material requirement planning at the lower level than the default plant level. Subject to the Type of MRP Area (which is defined in Transaction OMIZ), the MRP Area will correspond to the whole plant or the storage location or to a subcontractor. If the MRP Area Type is selected as at the Storage location level, then you will assign the storage location to the MRP Area in the storage location field. As far as the MRP Area configuration is concerned, there have been three main Transactions you should use:
1. Activate MRP for MRP Areas (Transaction OM01)
2. Define MRP Areas (Transaction OMIZ) and
3. Define Scope of Planning for Total Planning (Transaction OM0E).
MPN Missing in RFQ, Contract or Scheduling Agreement
The MPN functionality is the same for both types of transactions with the exception that in the Enjoy transactions you have fields Manufacturer part number and Manufacturer. The only way to have a preferred MPN number when creating a document is only having a relationship one-to-one. This is just possible in the purchasing view of the internal material or just have one MPN material assigned to an Internal material. For further details, check in OSS Note 663302.
Mass Maintenance via MEMASSPO Transaction
Function Module ME_LIMIT_FIELDS_PO contains all non-changeable fields for the mass change of the Purchase Order. In addition, the following item fields can not be changed with existing items â
1) Material Number (EKPO-EMATN)
2) Material Description (EKPO-TXZ01)
3) Purchase Order Quantity (EKPO-MENGE)
4) Order Unit (EKPO-MEINS)
5) Net Price (EKPO-NETPR)
6) Purchase Order Price Unit (EKPO-BPRME)
7) Plant (EKPO-WERKS).
For further details, check in OSS Note 501853.
Mass maintenance of Purchasing Info Record
Use either Transaction LSMW or Program RM06IBI0.
Mass maintenance of MRP Area
Go to Program RMMDDIBE. Both 'Material Number' and 'Plant' number range should be entered. Go to 'Set/Reset Deletion Indicator' tab page and enter the proper entry in the 'MRP Area' and the radio button to set deletion flag.
Invoicing Plant Configuration Set-up
The invoicing plan enables you to schedule the desired dates for the creation of invoices relating to the planned procurement of materials or services independently of the actual receipt of the goods or actual performance of the services. It lists the dates on which you wish to create and then pay the invoices.
You have the system create the invoices automatically on the basis of the data in the purchase order, thereby triggering payment of the vendor. It is also possible to enter the invoice for an invoicing plan manually.
There are two kinds of invoicing plan: Periodic Invoicing Plans and Partial Invoicing Plans. Both types are available as of SAP R/3 4.0A.
To be able to work with invoicing plans, the following conditions must be satisfied:
1) Maintaining the settings in Customizing for purchasing (for example, invoicing plan type, date categories, date descriptions, and date sequence proposals). The path is IMG ---> Material Management ---> Purchasing ---> Purchase Order ---> Invoicing Plan ...
2) The Purchase Order item must have an account assignment
3) The 'AutoEvalGRSetmtDel.' indicator must be flagged in the Vendor master record for automatic settlement utilization.
4) The Framework Order (document type FO) must be used. This document type requires that a validity period be entered in the PO header. This specification is adopted in the invoicing plan, provided that this has been predefined in Customizing for the relevant invoicing plan type.
5) The LIV must be used.
How to set the PR field mandatory when creating PO
Use Transaction Code OMET Create a new entry, give it a name and tick :-
1) Ref. to PReq;
2) Ref. to P.O.
3) Ref. to quotation.
Next, you've got to associate via SU01 and click Parameters, insert a new parameter id EFB to the authorization code. Type in Parameters value you want e.g. XX You have to assign the control for ALL the SAP buyers via the SAP users id.
How to block the unused storage location?
1) Restrict the users from posting any material document by maintaining authorization check at storage location level. Use path in SPRO - Materials management -> Inventory Management & Physical inventory -> Authorization Management -> Authorization check at storage location.
2) If you are using external procurement, go to the MRP2 View of the material master and maintain the field 'Storage loc. for EP'. This will default the storage location to the planned order or PR and then on to the PO. Upon the receipt the material will be received to the correct storage location. You also need to move existing stock from the old location to the new location by material transfer 311, remove the bin location and mark the old storage location for deletion.
3) Use Transaction Code MM06 to set a deletion flag for material at storage location level. This shall be done for all materials that have this storage location that can be found by checking the table MARD with SE16. As well the message M7 127 from warning to error message (transaction OMCQ) must be changed.
Goods Receipt up to current date for Scheduling Agreements
The implementation of OSS Note 741385 will enable the posting of GR for Scheduling Agreement Delivery Schedule with delivery date in the future.
Goods Receipt for Scheduling Agreement Delivery Schedule
The OSS Note 741385 details how to enable the posting of GR for Scheduling Agreement Delivery Schedule with delivery date in the future.
External Delivery Note for Goods Inbound Delivery Document
The OSS Note 520534 details the possibility of external delivery note in the Inbound Delivery Document.
Difference between VAX and VAY
The account grouping VAY is used for account determination for the offsetting entry for inventory posting (Account Key GBB) if the posting is assigned to the cost account-related object (cost center, order, project, profitability segment etcâ¦). Otherwise, the account determination is carried out with account grouping VAX. This procedure was chosen since the posting with a cost account-related account assignment is only possible to the G/L account which is a cost element. For further details, check in OSS Note 77764.
Difference between MB5B and MCBC
The MB5B is the Transaction Code for Material Valuation Analysis at the Plant level whereas the MCBC is the Material Valuation Analysis at the Storage Location Level. In case of Standard Valuation, the MCBC (or MC.9) does not reflect the valuation in the Material Master Data Records.
Determination of GR/IR Clearing Account
Check in Enhancement LMR1M002 which includes User Exit EXIT_SAPLKONT_011. This User Exit is called by the F. Module MR_ACCOUNT_ASSIGNMENT. The disadvantage of this User Exit is that the program will determine the GR/IR Clearing Account based on this program (which is referring to the Purchase Order Data) and therefore, we have to assure the same GR/IR Clearing Account is to be posted during Goods Receipt and Invoice Receipt posting. For further details check in OSS Note 301477 and 165692.
BOM explosion for Subcontract Scheduling Agreement
The explosion of the BOM is subject to the calculation of the requirement dates. The details of such calculation logic is seen in OSS Note 196684.
Automatic Source of Supply Determination for services without service master record
Set out below are necessary steps to be done/set up in the system -
1) Maintain the purchasing master data record (contract) for material group;
2) Go to IMG -
External Services Management -
Source Determination and Default Values -
for Purchasing Organization where the 'Material Group at Item Level' indicator checkbox shall be activated.
Once the PR is created for your service item, using Transaction ME57 will enable you to make the automatic default of source of supply into the PR line item.
Auto Source of Supply Determination in ME56 Transaction
Check in Program RM06BZ10.
Account Posting Differences - GR before IR and vice versa
1) With GR before IR: The GR is done at PO price and the invoice will check the price and revaluate the materials if necessary. In this particular case, we may get postings for the revaluation of existing stock and/or postings for the price difference in case (part of) the stock is no longer there. Furthermore, GR will hit the cost object on the PO item (ie. cost center, order number or stock) and posts $ to the GR/IR clearing account for the plant used on the item; whereas
2) With IR before GR: the GR is done at IR price. In this case, we don't have these differences except in case of subsequent debit/credit postings. IR hits the GR/IR clearing account and posts $ to the Vendor account. If there is a difference in the amount in the GR and the invoice amount, the difference will post back to the cost objective.
Account Posting Difference when GR before IR and vice versa
1. With GR before IR: The GR is done at PO price and the invoice will check the price and revaluate the materials if necessary. In this particular case, we may get postings for the revaluation of existing stock and/or postings for the price difference in case (part of) the stock is no longer there. Furthermore, GR will hit the cost object on the PO item (ie. cost center, order number or stock) and posts $ to the GR/IR clearing account for the plant used on the item; whereas
2. With IR before GR: the GR is done at IR price. In this case, we don't have these differences except in case of subsequent debit/credit postings. IR hits the GR/IR clearing account and posts $ to the Vendor account. If there is a difference in the amount in the GR and the invoice amount, the difference will post back to the cost objective.

Transaction GBB during pgi vs billing

Dear All,
transaction GBB, there are vax and vay.
vax where account is not cost element whereas vay, account is cost element.
1) may i know when to use vax and when to use vay?
2) during pgi, goods issue account is debited whereas during billing, cogs is updated in copa via ke4i.
- may i know why cogs not debited during pgi but rather goods issue account debited?
thanks

Hi,
Basically in costing based COPA the system does not post the cost of goods sold to COPA during goods issue but it is done at the time of posting the invoice since the system wants to see the revenues and the COGS values together.
Since the system posts the COGS into COPA at the time of invoice posting, you will appreciate that if this is also done during goods issue then you will have duplicate entries in your COPA (i.e. the COGS will be doubled).
If in transaction VL01N/VL02N a costing-based line item would be posted, the costs would be double in CO-PA (the billing and goods issue) For this reason, no costing based line items will be created in the standard R/3 system for transaction VL01N/VL02N.
As per the Notes 77764 and 616097, there are two scenarios for the account determination.
For the Note 77764:
The account determination for the offsetting entry for inventory posting (account key GBB) with account grouping VAY is executed during the goods issue for the delivery (when you are using the Customizing delivered by SAP), if the posting is assigned to a cost accounting related object (cost center, order, project, profitability segment).
Otherwise, the account determination is carried out with account grouping VAX.
According to the Note 616097 states:
For goods issues for the delivery of make-to-order material or material with direct cost controlling, the system in detail shows the following posting behavior:
o Valuated sales order stock
For valuated sales order stock, if special stock indicator SOBKZ is specified with E and indicator KZBWS for the valuation of
special stock is specified with M = 'Separate valuation with reference to sales document/project' or 'A', the following is valid:
- For product cost by sales order:
     Here, the indicator for consumption posting KZVBR is determined with E = 'Sales order'. Thus, VAY results as
     account modification in the standard setting.
- Without direct cost controlling:
     Here, the indicator for consumption posting KZVBR is     determined with 'blank' = 'No consumption'. Thus, VAX results
     as account modification in the standard setting.
In a short conclusion,
For GI document(with no special stock), system will check the cost center/order etc.. If anyone of these items is not blank, mseg-kzvbr is set as V, VAY will be determined.
For GI document (with special stock E), system will check the account assignment. If the consumption posting KZVBR is E, VAY will be determined.
regards
Waman

Can I assign diffierent GL to movement type 601(GI) and 459(return to bl ?

dear friends,
we have GL50000 (cost of goods sales) assigned to both movement type 601(goods issue) and 459( transfer posting from return to bloked stock).
My question is :
1. Can I assign different GL to these two types of goods movement?
2. in which configuration can I find movement key , such as 601 behind a transaction, such as goods issue?
Your advice will be deeply appreciated.
Thanks,
Linda

Hi
Yes, you can assign
The Key for 601 PGI is VAX & VAY
The Key for 459 is is also VAX as per OMJJ... However, you can type ZAX in the place of VAX and assign a diff GL Account in OBYC: GBB-ZAX
Go to OMJJ > Tick Movement type > Enter > Specify the Mvt Type 459 > Enter > CLick on "Account Grouping Tab" on Top Left side
br, Ajay M

How to configure Free of charge posting to cost account and not to balance?

Hi,
If we post GI for a free of charge delivery (sample) the following will be posted:
Cost of Sales 100
Finished goods 100
But we do not want to post to Cost of Sales but to a cost account.
What do I need to change?
Regards,
Eric.

Hi Eric van Zundert,
Follow below mentioned procedure;
1. OMJJ - Copy a new movement type as "901" from Movement type "601". For new movement type change the Valuation Modifier to "YAX" instead of "VAX" and SAVE.
2. OBYC - Here go to T/E key "GBB" and do the account determination for the new valuation modifier "YAX" of new movement type (Created in Step1).
3. VOV6 - Go to the Schedule Line Category (which is getting determined in Free of Charge Order) and assign the new Movement Type "901" instead of "601" and save.
Note: - If this Schedule Line Category is used for multiple Sales Orders then copy and create a new Schedule Line Category and do the changes for this one as suggeste din step3 and also do the schedule line category determination.
Now create a new order and do delivery and PGI and check A/c entry, also check during delivery it should pick up new Movement Type.
You need to take help of ur SD Consultant in this case.

Cost of Goods Sold - Cost Element asking Cost Object

Dear All,
We have defined a G/L account :500000 (Cost of Goods Sold - Field Status Group:G030).
Normally we should not create it as a cost element,but when CRM consultant does a transaction ,system asks that GL account :500000 not created as a cost element,Hence that time I have created as a cost element.
Now every time ,system is asking for cost object for this cost element.
As you all know that ,we can maintain in OKB9,but in our scenario,we have more than 3500 Cost Centers,which is not possible.
Can anybody share as how to resolve this issue?
Regards
Subbu

Thanks Mr Ajay for understanding my question.
As I told mentioned in my initial question that I have created the GL:500000 (COGS) when CRM/SD issues the stock for delivery.
What my FI done is that the same GL (500000) is assigned both in GBB-VAX and GBB-VAY as per the client requirement.
Now suggest me as how to come out from this situation?
If I need to do Validation ,request you to give your guidance as how to do it as I never done.
Thnaks in advance.
Su

Ke24 cost of goods sold field reporting future price not actual cost.

Hi Guru's
KE24 line item report is showing a future price in the costs of goods sold field. Can this report be configured to show the actual costs of goods sold from the relevant accounting document.
thanks

Thanks Mr Ajay for understanding my question.
As I told mentioned in my initial question that I have created the GL:500000 (COGS) when CRM/SD issues the stock for delivery.
What my FI done is that the same GL (500000) is assigned both in GBB-VAX and GBB-VAY as per the client requirement.
Now suggest me as how to come out from this situation?
If I need to do Validation ,request you to give your guidance as how to do it as I never done.
Thnaks in advance.
Su

VAX and VAY

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for