Vendor master dual control

Hi gurus,
Is there possible to have 2 different groups of ppl control & confirm vendor master changes to different sensitive fields. How?
for example, group 1 can only confirm the changes made to address related fields.
group 2 can only confirm changes made to the bank details.
Regards
Chin

Hi,
User-exit SAPMF02K (EXIT_SAPMF02K_001) could be useful for you.
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

Customer / Vendor Master Dual Control - Sensitive Fields

Dear SAP Experts,
I have configured a business requirement to extend the Senstive Field functionality towards customer master. I have defined the new Customer group and also assigned the fields. Every time a change to the Customer master record (KNA1 and KNB1) fields are changed, the message pops for the confirmation to be done thru FD08/FD09.
The only question I have is the relevance behind this control as even after the changes not yet to be confirmed, the system is allowing me to bill the customer (Sd billing) and pass the entry to FI accounting? On the other hand the Vendor functionality does not allow a billing run unless and until the changes are confirmed. My question is what is the relevance of the customer master. Can anyone who has an idea about this provide some insight about the dual functionality of this sub module.
Rgds,
Abhai

hello, friend.
i wish to understand your situation better. if the sensitive fields restrictions are working for vendor, then there should be similar features for customer. the, my question is "are you -
1. "working in a DEV environment where you have consultant's (unlimited) authorization or
2. "working in a QAS/PROD environment where you have specific authorization?"
perhaps you have already checked this, but please indicate if you the authorization groups and transaction codes authorization have been set for the users.
many thanks.

Vendor master field control

hi,
in XK02 change vendor's main screen, under "general data" i want "payment transactions" to be hided or not selectable. so that whoever uses XK02 they won't be able to change Bank information. how can i do that?
cheers

Hi
This can be controlled through account group field selection.
SPRO- SAP IMG- Financial Accounting (New) -Financial Accounting Global settings (New) -Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable - Vendor accounts - Master data - Preparations for creating vendor master - Define account group with screen lay out
SPRO- SAP IMG- Financial Accounting (New) -Financial Accounting Global settings (New) -Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable - Vendor accounts - Master data - Preparations for creating vendor master - Define screen laout per company codes
Check it out
Regards,
Raman

Currency field in Vendor master

Hi,
There are vendors in the production client. But the vendors are without any purchasing view as it was uploaded for Fnance purpose. Now i have done the settings for purchasing view & transported to production. But the currency field is not coming for the vendors. What setting needs to be done to make that field active.
Thanks
John

Hi
Screen layout for the vendor master is controlled by the Vendor account group.
Please see the screen layout for vendor account groups in the following menu
SPRO-> Financial accounting -> Account receivable and Account payable -> Master data -> Preparation for creating Vendor master data -> Define account groups with screen layout
Selct the vendor account group and go to details, where you select the Purchasing data and agian select Purchasing data , You can fine Purchase order currency field.Please make field as optional or Required entry as per your requirement.
Regards
Ramakrishna

Replication Error with Vendor Master Records

Hello,
We are trying to replicate vendor master records from R/3 to SRM via BBPGETVD. When we go to SLG1, there is an error stating Business Partner XXXX: Invalid Value 0003 for field Authorization Group.
Currently, the AP dept. maintains the field Authorization Group in the Vendor Master Record 'Control' screen with a fixed value of 0003 (LFA1-BEGRU). When the replication occurs, SRM complains that this field value does not exist in a SRM customizing table or is a fixed value.
Do we need to implement the BBP_TRANSDATA_PREP BAdI to pass this value as a fixed value to replicate vendors?
-regards
Shaz Khan

I'm planning to implement bbp_transdata_prep. Wondering if either one of you can help. I've also opened another thread with my specific questions.
Replication Error with Vendor Master Records

Dual Control for Vendor/Customer Master Data

We can set Dual Control for Vendor/Customer Master Data. I have set it. According to the cycle, I have customized sensitive field, and make changes in Vendor/Customer A/c. Here the changes will be confirmed by other user who is authorised to confirm the changes. In this scenario, I would like to know, can we avoid this confirmation once we have actived? If, no than how could we confirm the changes and where can we set authorisation?

Dear,
No, You cannot avoid the dual check if You activate it. Another user by FK08 has to confirm the changes.
Then You can delete the field for the dual control into the table T055F and no check will be done in the future.
I hope this helps.
Mauri

Dual control for vendors per Company code

Hi,
we are going to setup dual control (sensitive fields) for master data of vendors (fk01, fk02).
Is there a possibilty to use dual control only for certain company codes and not all?
How can I restrict this - via workflow, user authorisation, user exit?
Any idea or solution?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Yvonne

Hi,
thank you both for your fast replies.
Dual control means we want to confirm critical vendor changes (t code fk08, fk09).
That means if someone Create (fk01) or Change (fk02) Vendor data with sensitive fields, another person has to approve this changes in transaction fk08 or fk09.
But this confirmation in fk08 and fk09 should not be necassary for all changes in fk01 or fk02, but only for some company codes.
In this standard workaround in SAP all vendor changes need to be approved. How can I restrict this that only some company codes need to be confirmed in transaction fk08 and fk09.
Thanks.
Yvonne

Dual Control in G/L master data

Hi All,
Dual control principle is available for customer and vendor master data. Is there any such facility for G/L master data whereby any change in G/L master data can be checked/ confirmed by some other person.
I want dual control principle to be implemented in G/L master data to have a check on the changes made in sensitive fields by manager.
Can anyone help in this one...
Regards.

Dear gs_sapfi ,
1. you can create a profile to the transaction PFCG to link to your user, you give them only the option to see the fields but not to change them.
Please run SU24 and insert the transaction FS00 to check the authorization objects linked to them.
2. you can control this field F_BKPF_BES by GL account
Regards
shankar

Can Bank Master Be Dual Control?

Hi Gurus,
Numerous requests to make changes to Bank Master (FI02) are causing some problem and we are thinking about putting some restrictions within the Bank Master. I know we can apply the dual control functionality to the vendor master bank details by making some fields sensitive. But is there a way to make the SWIFT code field in the Bank Master sensitive?
Thanks,
Keen

Hi,
You can do that by Authorization groups. Go to Spro: IMG. Enter "dual control" in search tool (ctrl + F).
You have mentioned abount sensitive case, FK08/FD08. In this case you can't do for Banks Master data.
Regards

Dual control one-time vendors possible?

Dear experts,
Does any of you know if it is possible to have dual control on sensitive fields for one-time vendors?
Thanks.
Jurriaan

Dear Aravind
Thank you for your answer.
I have checked this in our system and it works fine if you change the vendor master data.
However, when you enter the one-time vendor data (bank data) during the creation of the vendor invoice, no dual control is executed by the system.
That is the moment where we want to have that check because for every one-time vendor the bank account has to be entered by the user.
Do you know if that is possible?
Thanks.
Jurriaan

Sensitive fields for dual control (vendors)

Dear Experts
I want to configure sensitive fields for dual control -Vendors. Iam unable to see the field "SWIFT".
Can any one helps, please
Regards
Ahmed Zain

Dear El Zain,
Unfortunatelly due to the SAP Standard System Design, it is not possible
to define SWIFT as sensitive field for dual control.
Table T055F was not thought to change them.
I'd suggest you to try using a BTE; please check by BERE transaction the
BTE 00001450 (Vendor master record, individual duplicate check).
'Function module SAMPLE_INTERFACE_00001450 must not be changed.
Probably by this BTE you could reach your goal.
I hope this helps.
Mauri

HR Master Record Replication to FI with Dual Control for Sensitive Fields

Dear Experts,
We have an issue on our project whereby employee records are maintained in HR, but replicated to FI on a regular basis via tcode PRAA, creating employee vendors.
We wish to activate the "Dual Control for Sensitive Fields" for the vendor master, however all employee vendors created via PRAA are also blocked and require confirmation.
Have any of you encountered a similar issue, and how do you resolve it?
Many thanks,
Mark

Hi,
Please go through the following path for configuration :
Point No. 1
1> Customer
IMG --> Financial Accounting (New) --> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable --> Customer Accounts --> Master Data --> Preparations for Creating Customer Master Data --> Define Sensitive Fields for Dual Control (Customers)
2> Vendor
IMG --> Financial Accounting (New) --> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable --> Vendor Accounts --> Master Data --> Preparations for Creating Vendor Master Data --> Define Sensitive Fields for Dual Control (Vendors)
Point No. 2
You can execute transaction code FD08 in background with a periodic job for each User ID who has authorization and tick on Accounts to be confirmed by me and send the output via mail through distribution list or each user can view output by viewing spool by going to transaction code SP01.
Point No. 3
Same as point 2 only need to select option Accounts refused.
Point No. 4
Yes
Point No. 5
Same as point 1
Hope your issue gets resolved.
Regards,
Tejas

Master data changes Dual control (per Company code)

Hello Experts,
Am now planning to setup Dual Control for Vendor & Customer Master's Sensitive fields like Bank Account details (note that Bank details are setup in "General data" irrespective of Company code.
My client has Companies spread across the globe.
I have some questions. Hope somebody can help.
1) Can i activate Dual Control functionality for just 1 or 2 Companies. As far as i know this is not possible in config. Any easy work around?
2) If i implement this change as it is , how does it work?
For example if an Accounting clerk in Germany changes a Vendor Bank Account number , any one who has access to FD08 (or FD09) in France can approve this change. Where as ideally this change should only be able to confirm by a Manager in Germany.
This means every body can see & confirm other companies master data changes.
Just a thought, can i restrict this in authorisation by Account Group?
But isn't there a way to display only the relevant changes to be confirmed by each manager(limited to thier own Company or Account group)
Thanks in advance.

Bank Details are not company code specific. So can't restrict per company code.
Any other suggestions, please ?

Confirmation Control Key Value in vendor master overwritten by Info Record?

Dear all
In the standard 3rd party processing, we will use S/O to trigger PR and we then convert PR to PO. And when PO is converted, Confirmation Control Key (CCK) Z01 maintained in Vendor master purchasing view will be adopted for all the items in the PO, and in the purchase infor Record for the combination of material & this vendor, we do not maintain any CCK value there.
However recently, the system behaves in such a way that the CCK value does not automatically show up in PO item anymore. And I have been thinking can it be the fact that the blank value of CCK in info record will overwrite the Z01 value in the CCK of vendor master? But if so, why all the past PO I have checked does not have CCK value maintained in info record but the CCK was able to appear automatically?
An interesting fact is that if I create the PO manually by enter Vendor with CCK value Z01, Org Data, account assignment S and Item category S (both for 3rd party processing), and then the material and hit ENTER, the CCK value Z01 will appear in PO Item level under tab: Confirmation.
However, once I enter the PLANT value in PO Overview, seem like the Empty value of CCK in info record will overwrite the existing Z01 value.
Please advise if it is how the info record CCK work to overwrite? Also, how do I get back to the stage where the info record CCK will not overwrite as I do not want to spend time to update all the info record CCK to have Z01.
Thanks

Dear Manohar Raju Kanchanapally
I do not understand why this OSS note SAP Note 909885 - ME21N: Confirmation control key not
from vendor mentions the following:
Symptom:
When you create a purchase order using Transaction ME21N, the confirmation control key from the vendor master is not used, although it is maintained.
Cause and Prerequisites:
The symptom occurs if no confirmation control key was maintained in the existing purchasing info record.
Solution:
Implement the attached correction instructions as a modification.
It is totally contrary with the General Rule that the most specific will always prevails, meaning if I do not maintain CCK value in the Info Record, it will overwrite the CCK value I maintain vendor master when I create PO using same vendor, material, purchaisng org and plant!
Please help!
Edited by: Daimos on Sep 17, 2009 1:22 PM
Edited by: Daimos on Sep 17, 2009 1:22 PM

Regarding Vendor Master Control settings

Hi .
Can somebody expain Vendor master settings and what all they control ?
Also, who is considered as Second Vendor?
Thansk & Regards,
Smitha

done

Vendor master dual control

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for