Vendor Rebate: Income condition does not compute

Dear All,
I am trying to test our Rebate module but along the procedure, I have found some inconsistencies.
MEB1:                Create Rebate Agreement - step ok
ME21N to MIRO:       Create PO until LIV - step ok
MEU2:               Business Volume Comparison.  Inconsistencies in this step. There are times where the income condition does not compute an amount. When I click the Income Icon, there is amount in the Condition Basis, but Amount and Income Field displays zero. 
Im really at a lost why this happens.  Ive checked everything, created 2 identical rebate agreements except for the vendor and article, but 1 rebate agreement computes income correctly and the other rebate does not compute rebate income at all.  I have set the following indicators for the vendor in the purchasing view in the vendor master, Subsequent Settlement indicator and
Subsequent settlement index indicator also.
Please enlighten me on what could possibly be the reason for the Rebate not to compute income.
Thank you very much.
Tess

Ok, so I made some screens, sorry for the delay:
Layout : http://img842.imageshack.us/i/layoutkh.png/
Datas Page 1: http://img163.imageshack.us/i/page1wn.jpg/
Datas Page 2: http://img269.imageshack.us/i/page2cz.jpg/
Datas Page 3 (last page) : http://img196.imageshack.us/i/page3oe.jpg/
Thanks for your help.

Similar Messages

  • Why condition does not work.

    Hi Pros,
            in my bex query, there is a CKF OT hours, having a value 30.000, when I set a condition for 'OT hours = 30.000', but get no result out. could you please tell why condition does not work.

    HI,
    please check the "Characteristic Assignment" Tab in change condition window.
    In that tab default  selection as "All Characteristic in the drill down independently" change that selection  as "Individual characteristic and Char. combinations"  and choose the particular characteristic. for ex OT hours against employee means select employee alone.
    Regards
    Sureshkumar C

  • I have internet connection but my incoming email does not appear.  When I try to access new email it says, " connection to server has failed"  Help

    I have internet connection but myh incoming email does not appear.  When I try to access new emails it says, "connection to server has failed".  Help

    What did your email provider say about it when you contacted them?

  • How to avoid output file and error lines when condition does not match

    Hi Experts
    A customer want to send purchase order files to several vendors and each vendor has their own requirement to content and file format. I have prepared scenarios for each vendor and a template is (conditionally) called when CardCode matches. It works fine, - PO file is generated when CardCode matches, but error lines are written to SAP B1 Control Center each time CardCode does not match the one defined in a scenario (100 or more times per day). Problem is that these error lines does not get automatic deleted. Conditional processing are made in this way:
    Result Message in SAP B1 Control Center when CardCode does not match:
    I tried to avoid an error line in SAP B1 Control Center when CardCode does not match in this way:
    Then no error lines are written to SAP B1 Control Center, but an output file is generated each time (order file when CardCode matches and an empty file when CardCode does not match).
    Any suggestions on how to avoid both errors types (error lines in SAP B1 Control Center and empty output files)?
    Or - can lines in SAP B1 Control Center be automatic deleted?
    Regards
    Steen

    Hi Steen,
    using <b1im_skip> should be the right approach, if you're working with B1 OUTBOUND.
    Following extract form the B1i help describes the usage to skip the outbound processing:
    1.1 Skipping Outbound Processing
    If you do not want to hand over the message to the receiver system, the scenario step can create a special tag that indicates to generic processing in the integration framework to skip the message processing.
    Add the following to the final transformation atom (atom0):
    <b1im_skip xmlns= ”” info=”my info” msglog=”true” msgout="yes">
    If the integration framework skips the message, it puts the message log information to the Filtered section, if the message log is switched on. The result message contains the Message skipped by vBIU logic information.
    info
    To display an individual message, define it using the info attribute.
    msglog
    If you want to avoid an entry in the message log, introduce the msglog attribute and set it to false.
    msgout
    To display the skip information in the Success section of the message log, use the msgout attribute and set it to yes.
    In case you don't want any MsgLogEntry in case of a skipped message, please enter the following in final atom0:
    <xsl:template name="transform">
    <xsl:attribute name="pltype">xml</xsl:attribute>
    <xsl:choose>
    <xsl:when test="$msg/BOM/BO/Documents/row/CardCode=&apos;C20000&apos;">
    <xsl:call-template name="transform2"/>
    </xsl:when>
    <xsl:otherwise>
    <b1im_skip info="skipped" msglog="false"/>
    </xsl:otherwise>
    </xsl:choose>
    </xsl:template>
    Best regards
    Bastian

  • Vendor aging unreconciled bal. does not match with TB Acct. Payable balance

    Dear all,
    When i take unreconciled vendor aging report with selection creteria all vendor codes selected,aging date as 31/03/09 and posting date from 01/04/08 to date 31/03/09,Interval - 30 Days,By Journal postings
    Deticked all check boxes in it.
    Aging report total balance of all vendor does not match with account payable balance in Trial balance ?
    But for reconciled aging totals and trial balance total are same.
    How to solve it ? or i need to do any settings ?
    Jeyakanthan

    Hai!
    What version of SAP B1 u r using.
    I do got the same problem for my  customer. I did this..
    1. Run Aging Report for all Vendors. Donot check Recon Transaction.
    2. Export to Excel
    3. Run TB for BP selecting Vendors alone.
    4. Export TB to Excel.
    5. Find vendors who is having mismatch in their balance. (use V-Lookup in Excel)
    6. Run Detail G/L Transaction report for those Vendors one by one.
             *Selection from date: Age from date To date: Age To date *
             *Selection Reconcilled Transaction only
    7. Report Balance should be Zero. If not this problem is because of Internal Reconcillation.
    8. Open *Check and Restore Previous reconcillation * select the vendor, internal
    9. see the reconcillation details.
    10. see the posting dates. All should be in previous fiscal year. (I mean the reconcilled set should have same fiscal year ex: Recon -2 trans should be in same fiscal year)
    11. If, that is corrected and still difference exist means.
    12.Go to Manage Previous Reconcillation
    13. Select BP and Internal (Donot check system reconcill Trans)
    14. Check the Reconcillation wheather all in same fiscal year.
    Regards,
    Thanga Raj.K
    +91 9710445987

  • TS4425 How can i do when the latest iCloud Terms & Condition does not pop up?

    When I go to photo stream on my appletv, it says "unable to sign in The icloud terms of service have changed. For more info, go to http://www.apple.com/support/icloud".
    I have tried this resolution on my iphone and ipad already:
    On your iOS device, tap Settings > iCloud.
    Note: Verify that this is the same Apple ID you are using on the Apple TV.
    After a moment, the latest iCloud Terms & Conditions will load.
    Unfortunately, it does not pop up the icloud terms and condition for me to accept.
    Anyone can help me?
    Thanks all~

    Caused by the Ask Toolbar extension in Firefox 3.6.13, disable that extension or un-install it.

  • FM12: Show/Hide condition does not apply to entire book

    FM12: From the Show/Hide Conditional Text pod, Show as per Condition applied to entire book does not consistently update book with correct condition. Now to get the desired condition, I have to apply the condition per section in the book. Has the workflow for this feature changed with FM12? Or is it a bug? Thanks, Patti

    > ... I have to apply the condition per section in the book.
    No, you don't. You can apply it to all component files in one operation. In the Book menu, select all component files.
    View > Show/Hide Conditional Text
    {edit}
    [ Set ]
    As Arnis pointed out, you do need to Update the book for complete re-application of Conditions.
    Edit > Update Book
    {select all possibly excluding Apply Master Page}
    In particular, any Cross-References to conditionalized text will still be as they were until xrefs are updated.
    We exclude AMP from Update because it is unstable in FM7, and run it as a separate operation, and re-Update book after that because pagination may have changed.

  • Vendor rebate - new condition

    Hi,
    I am new to vendor rebates. I have a vendor rebate agreement in which a material had a condition valid to last year. How can I extend this condition to the current year?
    Sincerely,
    Nicky

    Hi,
    VB03 is for customer rebate. I am looking for extending a condition in vendor rebate.
    Thanks,
    Nicky

  • New template field does not compute

    I added a new template field in Address Book to hold custom data from another data base.
    When I go to import the new data, the new field does not appear in the import wizard where you assign targets for imported data.
    The 'stock' names offered in Card>Add Field do not match the wizard and even after I create a custom field in the Edit Template function, it doesn't show up as a target choice.
    I thought about just using one offered then changing its name but they have masks, like phone number layouts. Any help?

    Hi BW/BI Beginner:
    1. Delete the data on your InfoCube.
    2. Reactivate your Transfer Rules and InfoPackage.
    3. Reload the data to your InfoCube.
    Regards,
    Francisco Milán.
    Edited by: Francisco Milan on Jun 23, 2010 9:41 AM

  • XPath Expression to Check if certain condition does not exists

    Dear Experts,
    I have an interface scenario with this source message structure:
    /Message/Body/Field1
    Body have multiple occurence in the Message, and each Body will have only 1 Field1.
    at the Interface Determination:
    - Interface A:     if the /Message/Body/Field1 = "" exists
    - Interface B:     if the /Message/Body/Field1 = "" does not exists
    I have configured Interface A correctly with the following XPath expression:
    left operator:          /Message/Body[Field1 = ""]
    middle operator:     EX
    right operator:
    Somehow I still could not figured out how to check if /Message/Body/Field1 = "" does not exists.
    I've tried some XPath expression:
    left operator:          /Message/Body[Field1 = ""]
    middle operator:     !=
    right operator:        EX
    (this results in Interface B generated no matter /Message/Body/Field1 = "" exists or not)
    left operator:          /Message/Body[ (count(Field1 = "") = 0) ]
    middle operator:     EX
    right operator:      
    (this results an exception raised at Interface Determination when Message/Body/Field1 = "" does not exists)
    And some other workaround but still no success.
    Any advice would be appreciated.
    Thank you,
    Suwandi C.

    Am I getting you right: You want to route the message one way if there is at least one empty Field1in the message and the other way if there is no empty Field1 present?
    Maybe you could try:
    Left: boolean(/Message/Body[Field1 = '']/
    Operator: =
    Right: true
    Left: boolean(/Message/Body[Field1 = '']/
    Operator: !=
    Right: false
    boolean() should return true if the node-set provided to the function contains at least one node.
    I think you should use single quotes for literals.
    I'm not sure about the slash at the end of the left operator.

  • My incoming mail does not arrive

    my email address is [email protected] and it just does not arrive
    == This happened ==
    Every time Firefox opened
    == from installing ==
    == User Agent ==
    Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0; GTB0.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)

    Firefox doesn't do email, it's a web browser.
    If you are using Firefox to access web mail, you need to seek support from your service provider or a forum for that service.
    If your problem is with Thunderbird, see this forum for support.
    [http://www.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/support/]
    or this one
    [http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewforum.php?f=39]

  • IF CONDITION DOES NOT WORK WHEN PAGE BREAK IS THERE

    Hi,
    In my page I have some text and then I have put if condition and then Page Break (Next) and then some text and closed the if condition. When I run this if condition is simply ignore and it displays the data within if condition I do not know how to avoid.
    <?if: country = 'US'?>
    <?call-template:templateUS?>
    <?end if?>
    <?if: country = 'UK'?>
    <?call-template:templateUk?>
    <?end if?>
    <?template:templateUS?>
    Testing Data if mkt = 'US' (Section Break (Next Page))
    This should only come for US
    <?end if?
    <?template:templateUK?>
    UK Should only come
    <?end if?
    When I run the above template if the country is UK then also This should only come for US gets printerd how can I avoid this.
    Thanks

    Hello,
    Did you get this to work? Pls let me know. I am facing the same issue.
    Thanks,
    Krishna.

  • Appended field Vendor Group in LFB1 does not display in FK03

    Hi ,
    I had a problem with FK03 transaction I was not able to view the field I appended in table LFB1 which is Vendor group for spanish log-in in the system but for english log-in I was able to view the field I appended is language. Please advice what I am suppose to do in order to view the field in spanish log-in. Hope to hear ideas..Thanks ahead.
    --Ekit

    Hi,
    Login into spanish language and go to transaction  SE11. Check whether the new field is coming in LFB1 table. Also check whether the translation is maintained or not.
    Also check whether the account group field status in customizing allow this field to be displayed.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • That Does Not Compute

    I tried to purchase an album from iTunes directly on my iPod Touch and got a message that said something like "Your iTunes credits are insufficient or inapplicable for this purchase" along with a "Cancel" button and a "Get" button.
    I clicked the "Get" button and then got a blank page and nothing happened after that. The songs didn't download and the purchase doesn't show up in my iTunes purchase history, which would indicate that the purchase process didn't complete. There were no error messages after I clicked the "Get" button, but the purchase seems to have died there.
    Has anyone else had this problem?

    I submitted a support request to iTunes store support and received the following answer:
    "As an iTunes Store Customer Support representative, I handle issues related to billing, downloading, customer accounts, and the items available on the iTunes Store. The question you asked falls outside of my area of specialty, but Apple does offer some resources that should help you."
    Apparently, problems making purchases from the iTunes store do not fall within the purview of iTunes store support. This problem evidently requires DIY support.
    Nice going, Apple!

  • Multiple condition does not work

    Hi,
    I took a copy of the standard Leave request workflow (WS12300111) to a new workflow (WS90000002).
    The class that was used in this workflow (CL_PT_REQ_WF_ATTRIBS) was also replaced with a copy (ZHR_CL_PT_REQ_WF_ATTRIBS).
    The workflow is used for the approval of leave requests.
    Now in the workflow there is a multiple condition which verifies whether the request was approved, rejected or withdrawn (this was also there in the standard).
    The condition contains the rules:
    Approved    &REQ.STATUS& = POSTED or &REQ.STATUS& = APPROVED or &REQ.STATUS& = ERROR
    Withdrawn  &REQ.STATUS& = WITHDRAWN
    Other values Rejected
    --> REQ is an object of the class mentioned above. The rules were created in the normal way by clicking on the object in the container.
    The workflow always stops at this condition, because it can not define the value of REQ.
    If I check the container in the workflow report, the field REQ and its STATUS are correctly filled.
    What could be wrong here?
    Thanks,
    Wim

    Hi,
    I solved it...
    Just had to add a commit work to the task that is executing the status change of the request.
    Kr,
    Wim

Maybe you are looking for