Vendor Wire Payment Including "For Further Credit" Value

We process a decent amount of wire payments to our vendors. We execute the automatic payment program (F110) and the wire instructions are transmitted via EDI to our bank who pays on our behalf. More and more of our vendors are requiring we pay a bank account with instructions for a alternate/for further credit bank account and I can't find a standard way in SAP to accomodate this.
This isn't an issue of maintaining multiple banks in the vendor master and then using the partner bank pick one bank over another but rather when we transmit the wire to the specific routing# and bank account # it also needs to have some text that states "For Further Credit To XXXXXXX" (or Interim Bank XXXXXXX) where XXXXXXX is the name the vendor gives us to put in (usually some alpha numeric value but I suppose it could differ depending on the bank we pay).
I don't know why they can't just give us the account # they want the funds deposited in to but this is becoming more and more common place. Currently these For Further Credit (FFC) payments are done manually through the bank's manual wire submission webpage (completely out of SAP) where we put in the bank details and populate the XXXXXXX value in the FFC field but are trying to automate it so we can initiate the wire payments out of SAP so they won't have to be manually submitted on the banks website and then subsequently clear the open vendor items against the payment.
We thought about creating a new Text ID and assign it to the vendor so that a line stating "For Further Credit XXXXXX" could be maintained and have it passed in the IDoc but that seems a bit convoluted and hoped someone has had experience in this area they'd be willing to share.
Thanks in advance!

The reason why I started looking for another solution was because I couldn't figure out how to get it to work. Admittedly didn't put a ton of time in to it but in FIBPU I did the following.
Put in the vendor # in question for an outgoing payment.
It lists the payment details maintained in the vendor master record. I then double click the line shown.
We are paying a vendor in Taiwan USD so tried a couple things on the "Bank Chains for Creditors/Debtors" screen where on the left is the Dialog Structure and on the Right is the Recipient Bank Data with the selection section. It said this was the sender info but wasn't sure if this was the initial sender (our bank account) or the intermediary bank (the bank we pay in Taiwan who forwards it on). I entered the following records.
Currency     BankCtryS     Bank Key S
USD     TW     ABNATWTP                 - This would be the bank if they didn't use a bank chain we would pay and it's in the vendor master
USD     US     071923285 -         This is the bank key of our bank in the US that we send the IDoc to to initiate the whole payment
I didn't maintain a Payment Method Supplement in either scenario which I believe to be ok. Initially I thought the TW bank needed to be the record entered but just tried putting in the US record and all of a sudden I'm seeing the records in REGUH I need in the fields below. So I guess the bank needing to be entered here is our bank that initiates the payment, not the intermediary bank that will forward it on.
BNKS1                             Bank Country
BNKL1                             Bank Key
BNKN1                             Bank Account
I went in to the Bank Chain Assignment and maintained the following entry. This isn't the actual one but just for testing
No              Type             Corr Ctry         Corr Bank Key Bank Account
1     3     TW     CITITWTX     00000-5135300
Afterwards I checked our IDoc (thankfully we use the standard RFFOEDI1 program and PEXR2002 type) and see that two new data records (E1IDB02 I3 and E1IDBL2 I3) are shown and contain the CITITWTX and 00000-5135300 value.
I am not 100% sure if the bank type is an intermediary bank (2) or a correspondent bank (3) as the vendor has requested we set them up as a "interim" bank but in trying both options everything seems to work with the difference being the qualifier on the IDoc I2 vs I3.
Is that it? Again, thanks for the insight!

Similar Messages

You cannot supply payment terms for your credit memo

Hi,
My req is as per below,
1) I would like to apply payment terms on credit memo screen throgu auto invoice creation.
When i tried to update ra_interface_lines_all.term_id then i got error message : You cannot supply payment terms for your credit memo
Can someone gudie me.How is it possible?
Thaks,
Raj
Edited by: RajPatel on Sep 23, 2009 8:33 AM

Hi octavio,
Thanks for your valuable input.
You are right and also I found from metalink...
Subject: 11.5-AR-How Can You Enter Payment Terms For Credit Memos
Doc ID: 249547.1 Type: HOWTO
Modified Date: 16-DEC-2003 Status: PUBLISHED
goal: How can you enter payment terms for Credit memos
fact: Oracle Receivables 11.5
fix:
Payment terms cannot be used in Credit memos. This is standard functionality.
The trx_date/gl_date of the credit memo transaction is the date which is
considered as the due date of the credit memos. This is the current
functionality.
Thanks,
Raj

HT4623 Why did iTune declines my payment method for my credit card as my card still working .?

Why does iTune store declines my payment method for my credit card as my card is working ..?

If you tried to pay for a purchase on your credit card and for some reason the money wasent in the bank at the time of purchase it will decline your card untill you put more money in the account to pay for the download it declined the first time.

Dme payment File for invoice & Credit Memo

Dear Sapients,
I have created a DME Tree structure for PAYM. This structure contains header & line items. Header will contain the vendor bank master data inputs & Total payment payable by the bank per vendor for each payment run. The line items contain both invoices & credit memos details & their corresponding amounts.
Issue is getting the total value of all the invoice credit memo's in the header Field payment.
Currently, it sum-up the values without any sign in the payment file.
Below are the structure screen shots. Really appreciate quick response.
Structure
Header Field payment
Using Aggregation of Ref AMOUNT from line item
Line item reference field Amount
Structure field value of line item payment.
Kindly help to achieve this summation field value for the header.
regards
PBB

Dear Friends,
Can anyone shed some light on this topic ?
Many thanks
PBB

I would like to know why I cannot select a payment date for a credit card payment but I can select a payment date for a check payment on line.

I am trying to find out about on line payment dates.
When I have made payments via my checking account, I am able to schedule those payments.
Today I made a credit card payment and was unable to schedule that payment for my due date.
I was charged today.
I don't understand why I can pre-schedule an e-check but not a credit card payment.

Hey,
I think you will find that you have to have a debit/credit card stored on yur account regardless of whether your have iTunes Credit or want to purchase a free App. I don't know why, I assume its for ID verification or is part of the terms and conditions. I occasionally have to re-verify my credit card info even when just trying to run Update on one of my Apps or like I said downloading a free App.
If you need further clarification all you can do is contact iTunes Support:
https://expresslane.apple.com/ServiceOptionAction.action
Hope this helps. Andrew

F110 - payment run for paying Credit memo to the customer

Hi,
I haven't found any question about payment of credit memo to the customer via transaction F110. There is a error message Payment with currency EUR, payment method: No valid payment procedure appears. On the customer and in FBZP there are ok data.
The problem is I think in the sales invoice, where I don't se the payment method.
Do you have any experience with that?
Thanks
Saso

i solved the problem by myself

PayPal Payment Gateway for worldwide credit cards?

Which PayPal Payment Gateway covers european and worldwide credit card processing?

Dear Minhaj,
Please have a look at this article http://forums.adobe.com/docs/DOC-2529#comment-5577
-m

Payment Block for few Vendors

Dear Friends,
Our client wants to block few Vendors for Payments only. All other transactions should happen. Only payment should not be made to those vendors for some time.
Plz help in this.
Regards
Vishal

Hi
while giving parameters in F110 you have range of vendors to be included for payment. click on the right arrow and select "Select Ranges"
say for example you have 10 vendors
you dont want to make payment to 5th vendor
then you need to give the lower limit as 1 and upper limit as 4
then add one more line and give the lower limit as 6 and upper limit as 10
so the 5th vendor will be ignored for payment.
Hope this should solve the issue. You can change the parameters once your client agrees to remove the bcock.

Withholding tax in vendor down payments

Hi Friends,
While testing a scenario of withholding tax and vendor down payment
When Vendor down payment recorded with WHT;
For down payment document Vendor line item report (FBL1N) shows withholding tax amount in withholding tax amount column, withholding tax report S_P00_07000134 is showing the down payment document with correct tax amount.
When the above Vendor down payment cleared;
For the cleared document Vendor line item report shows zero in withholding tax amount column, and the withholding tax report S_P00_07000134 is also showing neither the cleared document nor the down payment document.
If the cleared down payment is reversed;
Vendor line item report shows withholding tax amount in withholding tax amount column, withholding tax report S_P00_07000134 is showing the down payment document but with zero tax amount.
Also the WHT amount in vendor line item report in column withholding tax is being displayed without a minus(-) sign indicating a debit amount, but this amount is in fact not a debit amount, when this column is sum up it gives incorrect total.
Please share your experience on such scenario.
Regards,

Hi MAURIZIO,
Thanks for refering the SAP note, but this note speaks of inconsistency of displaying WHT info with lot of withholding tax information, this note is applicable upto Release 470. We are on ECC 6.
Regards

Credit value used in credit check

Hi,
Could any one help me understand how credit value is calculated in credit check for sales orders.
I was assuming that credit value is undelivered value returned by fm -SD_CREDIT_VALUE_ORDER.
When i debug this fm gives me different value each time.Acoording to the config Total amount of order(incl tax) should be used for credit check.
Thanks in advance.
Priya.

Hope you have released the credit block and then when you are changing any parameter(other than qty and value) the order is going on credit check again? If yes, in OVA8 - under " Released orders are still unchecked" maintain number of days or percentage of change of value. Then the reeleased orders will not be checked again .
If you havent released the credit blocked order and when ever you do any changes to order and save it, you will get the credit blocked message all the times. If the amount is not consistent then may be you can execute few programs to reset the open credit value of the customers. Please refer to the below notes for incorrect credit values.
Note 1176872 - Composite SAP Note Incorrect credit Updated
Note 124571 - Incorrect credit values S066 S067 FD32
Note 377165 - Update open credit values for credit management
Note 716141 - Analysis Incorrect open credit values
Note 425483 Consulting notes Credit Checks
Regards
Sai

Vendor down payment request over PO value

Hi All,
I have a requirement for vendor down payment request amount compare to PO value checking.
I have PO with total value - 600 USD.
When I create down payment request using F-47, I input amount 1000 USD.
The system never show me any message.
I want the SAP to block me from posting down payment request over PO value.
I've read in the forum, to change message type F5373 with error type. But the message never appear in my F-47 screen.
Anyone can help me, what am I missing here ?
Thanks,

Hi,
You are right about message F5 373. But this is applicable at the time of the Payment of the Advance i.e. F-48. It is not available at the time of creating the Advance Payment Request against T Code F-47.
If you want to have this control in the Payment Request, then you will have to use the validation, which you can put with the help of your abaper.
Regards,
Amit

Withholding Tax Calculation Error for Vendor Down Payment Clearing:Oct '09

Hi,
We are trying to incorporate the new Withholding Tax Structure w.e.f. 01-Oct-09.
There were 3 scenarios possible:
a. Invoice = Down Payment
b. Invoice < Down Payment
c. Invoice > Down Payment
While 1 & 2 were taken care of effectively, the third scenario did not work as expected. The scenario is as follows:
1. Down Payment (Date : 30/09/09)
Amt : Rs. 40000/-;
Withholding Tax @ 15% : Rs. 6000/- (40000 * 15%)
Surcharge @ 10% : Rs. 600/- (6000 * 10%)
Edu Cess @ 2% : Rs. 132 (Rs. 6600*2%)
Higher Edu Cess @ 1% : Rs. 66 (Rs. 6600*2%)
2. Invoice (Date : 02/09/09) - As per new TDS Rates
Amt : Rs. 50000/-
Withholding Tax @ 10% : Rs. 5000/- (50000 * 10%)
Surcharge : NIL
Edu Cess : NIL
Higher Edu Cess : NIL
3. DPC (Date : 02/09/09) - Reversal of TDS calculated in Down Payment (Step 1) above.
Issue:
While making J1INCHLN, amount is adjusted as Rs. -1000/- (hence zero) not payable.
Also, the Surcharge, Edu Cess & Higher Edu Cess are also getting reversed in DPC.
As suggested by SAP Note No. 1372734 - Handling of downpayment clearing scenarios after budget '09, the scenario does not seem to work.
Actual payable should be worked out as under:
Invoice : Rs. 50,000/-
DP : Rs. 40,000/-
Bal : Rs. 10,000/-
TDS @ 10% : Rs. 1,000/-
All TDS Challans, Certificates & Returns must reflect Rs. 1000/- in the Challan.
Require assistance.
Regards,
Kapil Tilwani

Hi Kapil,
The following needs to be taken care of -
The message controls settings as the note suggests must be set as W.
When entering the details the logic is Vendor Debit amount is Tax amount + 1
The Vendor credit line, the tax code has to be assigned with the advance amount (amount for which the challan has been created) as the tax base amount and the tax amount will be the extra liability that needs to be created.
In your example -
The tax amount will be - 2000 ( the debit at the time of downpayment clearing should have been 4000 instead of 6000)
Tax base amount - 40000 (Challan for this amount has already been made at the time of downpayment made)
The vendor Debit - 2001 (2000 + 1)
The vendor credit - 1
Note - Tax amount and base amount has to be made manually in the withholding Tax tab for the credit entry.
Please revert for any clarification.
Thanks and Regards,
Anit

Static Credit Limit Check for Sales Orders - Net Value vs Credit Value

We are testing order credit check and we have run into a problem with the Static Credit Limit Check. The Static Credit Limit Check is set to use both Order and Delivery Values. SAP uses the values in S066 and S067 to determine what values it uses to check against the credit limit. Standard SAP uses the confirmed quantity times the credit price to get the order values - this is the credit value.
So the problem is, once an order is released it is set up so it does not go back on credit hold, so anything which is not confirmed (but could be) it a potential credit value which is unaccounted for in the credit exposure and the customer can go over the credit limit.
Additionally, we run AFS and have items which are rejected with a J0 rejection code (unconfirmed) which have the potential of being confirmed and shipped and we want to include these items in the value of the order which is being checked against the credit limit (along with the deliveries, invoices and receivables).
Here is a quick example.
Customer has a credit limit of $100 (no deliveries, invoices or receivables - to keep it simple)
Order 1 is placed with a credit value of $50.00 but a potential value of $100 (the other half is J0) - this passes the credit check since $50.00 is less than the limit.
Order 2 is placed for $50.00 and has a credit value of $50. This also gets approved.
At this point, the credit limit used is 100% (based on standard SAP)
Then Order1 backorder is confirmed and the new credit value is now $100. This order now puts the customer over their limit and if the order had been released would not go back on credit hold and therefore the customer is not over their credit limit by 50%.
What I want is for Order1 to be credit checked for the $100 not the $50 so the exposure is correct.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to how we could use the Net Value of the order to perform the static credit check? And any thoughts on how to determine the correct credit exposure (open order value plus items which are J0, plus deliveries, plus invoices, plus receivables)?
I am thinking about a Z table to track the adjusted values on the orders and then use one of the customer checks to do a static credit check with the adjusted value. And for the exposure, use the adjusted value to recalculate the values in F.35 to show a more accurate view of the credit exposure.
Does anyone have an easier way to do this? Any advice is appreciated.
Thanks,
Suzanne

Hi Suzzane,
In the scenario that you have provided, in the first order items worth 50$ are rejected. Hence standard SAP will not take this into account as this item is rejected.Two solutions can be provided here:
1) The line item can have a delivery block instead of a reason for rejection.This way the 50$ will get accounted.However, if this is against customer norms as this will appear in the order acknowledgment, this cannot be used.
2) User exit can be used where a credit check can be triggered once the document value changes, even though the document has a released status.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Vinu

FB10 - Default payment term for Credit memo

Hi,
I have question regarding the Payment terms in FB10- Credit memo entry (KG).
You must be aware that when we use F-43 or FB60 for posting Vendor Invoices (Document type KR), the payment terms on the screen will be "*", which means it should be picked up from the Master data. Similarly for posting Vendor Credit Memos (Doc type KG) using F-41 or FB65, the payment terms field is blank, which means 'Immediate payment'.
In case of FB10, Fast entry transaction code for both Vendor Invoice and Vendor Credit memo, the Payment terms for KR document is *. But for doc type KG (Credit memo), payment terms field is not blank. Instead, it is shown as *. Why is it? How can we make this blank for KG document postings. Please advise. Kindly revert in case you have any questions.
Regards,
Vinod

HI,
Please check the note 17410 for explanation.
Regards
Ravinagh Boni

Automatic payment process for a vendor from different company code

Dear Friends,
We have a situation here to process automatic payment for a vendor which belongs to our subsidiary.
The scenario is explained below.
Our main company code A pays for a particular vendor (Eg. V1) from company code B.
When processing automatic payment for company code A, the vendor V1 from comapny code B need to be selected for payment and the DME file generated should include the payment for V1 aswell.
I know that we can set up a company code as paying company code for others but the situation here is only to process payment for one particular vendor (not all) from the other ccode.
I would appreciate your advise in this matter.
Regards,
AJ.

Dear all,
Our situation is when we run the payment run for company code A it should also select the vendor V1 from company code B because the payment for vendor V1 has to be paid from the house bank of Ccde A. Cocde B is in different country and uses different house bank.
Is there any way to make the house bank of ccde A to pay for the vendor V1?
Regards,
AJ.

Vendor Wire Payment Including "For Further Credit" Value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for