Vendor with terms of payment

Hello
is it possible to assign  two  terms of payment  for a single
vendor for a single purchase org if yes how is it
maina

Hello Mahesh
It is possible.
Solution is to maintain Vendor data by vendor Sub-range (XK01/XK02) and then assign this VSR in Info record.
1) Vendor Master : XK01 /XK02
In the Purchasing data:
Select Extras-->Additional purchasing data
Select check box for Data Retention at VSR level allowed and press <Enter>.
Select 'Subranges' button (or Extras-->Sub-ranges)
Maintain 2 sub-ranges (e.g. z1 = PAyterma, z2=Payterm2)
Click on 'Alternative Data'
Select Subrange (e.g. z1) and press <Enter>
Change the purchasing data as you want (check that the header data contains sub-range also)
Similarly maintain for other sub-range also.
2) Info record for the material:ME11/ME12
In the general data, maintain sub-range as required.
I am sure it works.
Best regards
Ramki

Similar Messages

  • Terms of payment- 2 additional days are considered for giving discount

    Hi All,
    I am facing a problem with Terms of payment.
    I have configured a new terms of payment as "34 days -2% and 35 days net due".
    Surprisingly it is giving discount even if i pay on 35 and 36th day also. In OBB8, i have taken Document date as default date for calculating days and i have not given any additional days.
    This is text displayed at OBB8 "Within 34 days 2 % cash discount         Within 35 days Due net".
    Eg: I post doc on 01.04.09 and bline date is 06.05.09.
    Even when i pay this on 06.05.09 or 07.05.09, it is giving 2% discount.
    Please let me know why system is considering 2 additional days. This problem is there even in other payment terms also.
    Ours is a US based project.
    Regards,
    Rajanikanth.

    Hi Rajini,
    In your case, system allows due date + 2 days for grace days. Therefore the actual due date in your case is  05.05.2009 + 2 days = 07.05.2009. System will not calculate cash discount @2% on or after 08.05.2009.
    I think you are maintainin "Tolerance Group for Customers/Vendors.
    Please go to Transaction Code: OBA3. In OBA3, there is a field for "Grace days due date". I think you have given 2 days as grace days there. You have to remove grace days there and try it. Now system will not give 2 days as grace days while calculating cash discount.
    Hope this helps you.
    Regards,
    Kannusamy S

  • Terms of Payment does not copy to PO in R/3

    Hi All,
    We are using SRM 3.0 ECS, EBP4.0 and 4.6C R/3 versions.
    We have set Terms of Payment (say for eg ZA00)for a Vendor in R/3 and replicated the vendor in EBP. Also maintained the Terms of Payment for the Vendor in SRM through Business Partner maintainance transaction. The maintained payment terms do get copied over to the PO in SRM, however this particular payment term does not flow to the PO in R/3.
    We tried maintaining the Vendor with some other Terms of Payment (say for eg ZA01), this Terms of Payment flows to the PO in SRM as well as in R/3. Facing problem with some Terms of Payment.
    Any pointers to solve this issue would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks in advance,
    Regards,
    Francis

    Hello Francis,
    why dont we try maintaining and updating the payement terms in R/3 centerally and the same are replicated and used in SRM or somehwere else?
    Just go through the below notes might help
    Note 518531 - EBP: Update with terms of payment fails
    Note 884010 - Term of payment/delivery not transferred to purchase order
    Arshad
    Edited by: arshad ahmed on Jan 27, 2010 12:23 PM

  • With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

    Hi Friends,
    We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
    Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
    As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
    With holding tax rate is 0%,
    Based on modified net amount calculation
    and
    Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
    When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
    Which causes difference in 1099 – misc vendors
    Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
    Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
    Payment going out=
    $1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 – 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
    With holding base calculation =
    $ 1000 – 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
    Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 – 900 = 8.98
    Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
    Moreover, please tell me if it’s normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
    Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
    Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

    Dear All
    i am also having the same problem. The example is
    Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
    Input Tax @ 15%   = $  15,000
    Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
    Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
    On payment the system behavior should be
    Debit  Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
    Debit  Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
    Credit  W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325  ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
    Credit Bank Account  = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
    However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
    Debit  Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
    Debit  Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
    Credit  W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220  ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
    Credit Bank Account  = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
    this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
    Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
    Regards
    Bilal Athar

  • Change in Terms of payment for Vendors / Customers

    Dear Friends,
    If the Terms of Payments are changed in Vendor / Customer master data then what will be the effect on below situation :
    1.   How will any open Purchase Orders and any open Sales Orders be updated?
    2.  How will processed, yet open customer invoices and vendor invoices be updated?
    Please share your views on above.
    Regards,

    Hi Bidyut,
    SAP works on very clear philosphy known as changes with prospective effect.
    When you create a Purchase order or Sales order, this import Payment term from Purchasing area (not from Payment TAB) and sales area. In case you change the payment term in Vendor/Customer master, the invoices created taking the reference of the already created purchase/Sales orders will still have the old Payment Term.
    But the payment term field is editable so if you think these are not correct, you can change the payment term in PO/SO and even in invoices anytime but useful only if changed before they are paid.
    Hope this answers your query.
    Regards
    Bharat

  • Validate Terms of Payment in MIRO against vendor master

    Dear All,
    I have a requirement to Validate Terms of payment in MIRO with Vendor master data. I am using INVOICE_UPDATE  BADI to check if Terms of payment in MIRO is same as Vendor master table LFB1, However I also need to check days which is not in LFB1,
    How do I validate MIRO -> ZTERM and Days with Vendor master is there any function module ? I checked T052 table but ZTERM is not the only primary key and suggestions please ?
    Regards,
    soyunee
    Edited by: soyunee on Jun 23, 2010 11:43 AM

    Hi,
    See the the SAP documentation of Daylimit.
    For terms of payment which depend on whether or not the baseline date is
    after or before the 15th of the month, you can define a two-part payment
    term under the same terms of payment key. The terms of payment key is
    expanded by the day limit entered here. Thus there are two entries in
    which different terms can be specified.
    In your case,
    if rbkp-bldat is between 1st and 5th of the month, extract
    data related to t052-ztagg = '05'.
    If rbkp-bldat is between 6th and 20th of the month, extract
    data related to t052-ztagg = '20'.
    if rbkp-bldat is between 21st and end of month, extract
    data related to t052-ztagg = '31'
    Regards
    Vinod

  • Terms of payment in vendor master

    Can we have different terms of payment in vendor master? if yes what is the use of it?

    you can have payment terms at company code level and payment terms at purchasing org level.
    Company code level payment terms come into the game if finance posts invoices for which you do not have any purchase order.
    In a purchase order the payment terms from purchasing org view are taken.
    2fields are needed because vendors like a restaurant may not need purchasing views, you never create a purchase order. But finance may have to pay a bill.
    And the other way around, you may have vendors with purchasing view, that do not need company code data, as they serve only purchasing needs as order address or goods supplier, but the invoice is posted to the main vendor.

  • Terms of payment in sd module along with the fico interface

    Explain breifly abou the terms of payment in sd module along with the fico interface?

    Hi,
    See the the SAP documentation of Daylimit.
    For terms of payment which depend on whether or not the baseline date is
    after or before the 15th of the month, you can define a two-part payment
    term under the same terms of payment key. The terms of payment key is
    expanded by the day limit entered here. Thus there are two entries in
    which different terms can be specified.
    In your case,
    if rbkp-bldat is between 1st and 5th of the month, extract
    data related to t052-ztagg = '05'.
    If rbkp-bldat is between 6th and 20th of the month, extract
    data related to t052-ztagg = '20'.
    if rbkp-bldat is between 21st and end of month, extract
    data related to t052-ztagg = '31'
    Regards
    Vinod

  • Term of Payment in Vendor master

    In vendor master ,why are we maintained the Term of Payment in two diffecent place one is Accunting and other Purchasing view?
    I cant understand why are we maintain the same thing in diffrent place in same master data.Please explain in detail.

    Payment terms defined in different views of vendor master will used in particular modules only.
    In MM module,payment terms defined in purchasing view is used in purchase order,LIV.
    Whereas payment terms defined in accounting view is used in FI module(invoice using F-43,FB60 etc.,)

  • Single payment for Multiple vendor with Common Remit to payee

    HI
    2 vendors "A" and "B" maintained with common remit to payee as "X "Vendor. 2 PO created and 2 invoice created. both the invoice are open for payment. When i run automatic payment with both the vendor, can i get single payment cheque ?. Payment method for both vendor is Cheque. I have done necessary setting in vendor master for single payment.

    Hi Madhavan,
    Before doing the payment you should change the setting of APP.
    Go to OBVU transaction
    There is option 'single payment for marked item' in Grouping of items
    Select that check box
    Now you can pay one single payment for 2 vendors invoices
    May be this information is useful to you
    If you have any doubt feel free to ask
    Regards
    Surya

  • Payment proposal F110 including several vendors with all payment methods

    Hi all,
    When we create a payment proposal with vendor from 1 to 999999 included and payment method I for Swedish Bankgiro all vendors appears in proposal, even vendors that have another payment method. The vendors that have nother payment method is red and not included in the payment run but when we have selected I we don´t want all vendors to appear in the proposal list when they don´t have this payment method. How can we avoid this, is it possible?
    BR L

    Hi Lisa,
    That is because the selection of vendor accounts has higher priority than the way selecting vendor list by payment method in that tab. You can try parameter tab-vendor account-multiple selection-multiple value input-account seletion criteria. Since you have chosen vendor from 1 to anynumber, those vendors must be selected even have different payment methods, you can only look into exception list to reschedule payment. Personally, this is more making sense. Maybe you can get help from ABAPer, not so sure. If you have solved it, kindly let us know how-to.
    RD
    Dav

  • Terms of Payment Not Flowing in P.O from Vendor

    Hi Experts,
    My client has different Terms of Payment for different Vendors, and those required Terms of payment has been created.
    And when i am Creating a vendor from Vendor Master and maintaing the terms of Payment in Vendor master and raising a P.O the assigned Terms of Payment in Vendor Master is not picking in P.O automatically. Could any one suggest any settings are required to pick or flow the maintained terms of payment from Vendor master to Purchase Order ?
    Please advice your Valuable inputs.
    Best Regards
    Javeed
    Please suggest your Valuable input on this.
    Best Regards
    Javeed

    Hi,
    1] You can create PIR for that vendor and maintain the required payment term.
    This payment term will automatically picked up in PO because highest priority is always given to PIR
    2] You can also maintain the payment term in personnel settings
    3] Also you can maintain payment term for a particular vendor plantwise. in short if you are raising a PO for a particular vendor from plant say XXX, that payment term for that plant will be automatically picked up in the po. Following is the procedure for the same
    Display vendor
    Go to PURCHASING DATA
    EXTRAS
    ADD PURCHASING DATA
    TICK DATA RELEVANT AT PLANT LEVEL ALLOWED
    ENTER
    EXTRAS
    ALTERNATIVE DATA
    CREATE
    ENTER PLANT
    TICK PURCHASING DATA
    ENTER
    NOW YOU CAN SEE PLANT BELOW PURCHASING ORG. VG00
    NOW CHANGE PAYMENT TERM.
    Amol

  • Terms of Payment Key in line item with Special G/L Indicator

    Hi All,
    Displaying the line item of a financial document with Special G/L Indicator,
    I can't see the Terms of Payment Key (BSEG-ZTERM).
    Could anyone tell me how to make it shown?
    Thanks
    G.

    Hi:
            BSEG-ZTERM is not contained by SAP standard dynpro:SAPMF05A 304 and hence it is not possible to display payment term in down payments with special GLs indicator, The reason being that the terms of payment not only control the due date but
    also the cash discount terms. Hence it is not feasible to display terms of payment in Down payments. DP forms part of balance sheet and hence it is not system design to display payment terms with special GL indicator, Hope it will help you.
    Regards

  • Different Terms Of Payment for one Vendor

    Hi all,
    For one big vendor we have different terms of payment (TOP) for different company codes. As we use only one purchase organization we can not differentiate between them.
    I found one posting to use vendor sub-ranges. But this is not practicable, as we don't use info records for each and every material.
    Is there any other way to realize this or any customer exit?
    Thanks for your help.
    Tobi

    hi buddy
    u will be having one std terms and remaining optional ,
    what u can do is the one in frequent use put it in ur vendor master and then if u want to change  u can change at time of miro
    so u can put  other terms while doing miro manually
    i think that will be better
    reward if useful
    regards
    kunal

  • Payment wizard-- include vendors with zero balance

    Hi-
    We are running SAP 8.8 pl 13.
    We want to be able to include Vendors with a zero balance in the payment wizard. The scenario in question is this: we have an advance outgoing payment on account that is open. We have an open AP Invoice for the the same amount. The vendor account balance is zero, but we want to go ahead and pay the open invoice anyway.
    Currently- if a vendor has a zero account balance the vendor code cannot be selected in step 3 of the payment wizard.
    Is there a way to configure this?
    I realize that this is counter-intuitive....
    thanks
    John

    Hi John,
    Do you mean your open advance outgoing payment on account has the same amount with open AP Invoice? However you need another payment for the invoice and still hold the advance?
    Thanks,
    Gordon

Maybe you are looking for