Video Editing in a Business Environment

Hi all,
We are about to put together a video editing workstation in a business environment.
First, we wanted to go for Mac, but this is an IT no-go.
We are not editing professionals, our purpose is to edit business videos in reasonable speed with easy software.
We have an AVCHD Camera from Canon which can shoot full HD, even though we might stick to a lower resolution.
Software wise we have Premiere Pro CS4 (no upgrade to CS5 in sight) and will most likely replace it with Premiere Elements 9, because feature-wise its enough for what we need it and its easier to use for now.
Hardware wise, our business IT proposes one of the following options:
1. Dell Precision T3500 V2
Chassis: Dell Precision T3500
Processor: One Intel Xenon W3503 (2.4GHz 4.8GT/s, 4MB,DC)
Memory: 4GB (2x2048 MB) 1333MHz DDR3 ECC-UDIMM
Fixed Disk: 250GB (15,000rmp) SAS Hard Drive
Graphics Card: 512MB nVidia Quadro FX580 Graphics Card
Controller Card: SAS 6i/R controller card
CD-Rom Drive: 16x DVD+/- RW Drive
2. Chassis: Dell Precision T5500
Processor: One Intel Xeon E5506 (2.13GHz, 4.8GT/ s,4MB)
Memory: 4GB (1x2048 + 2x1024) 1066 MHz DDR3 ECC
Fixed Disk: 300GB (15,000rpm) SAS Hard Drive
Graphics Card: 768MB nVidia Quadro FX1800 Graphics Card
CD-Rom Drive: 16x DVD +/- RW Drive
3. Chassis: Dell Precision T5500
Processor: One Intel X5550 (2.6GHz, 6.4 GT/s, 8MB, QC) Memory runs at 1333 MHz
Memory: 4GB (1x2 GB + 2x1GB) 1066MHz DDR3 ECC-UDIMM
Fixed Disk: 300GB (15,000rpm) SAS Hard Drive
Graphics Card: 1.5GB Quadro NIVIDIA Fx4800-2DP, 1 DVI (1DP- DVI, 1DVI- VGA Adapter) (HEGA16)
Controller Card:  SAS 6i/R controller card
CD-Rom Drive: 16x DVD- ROM Laufwerk
4. Monitors
TFT 17" Dell 17" E170S 1280 x 1024 bei 60 Hz
TFT 19" Dell 19" E190S 1280 x 1024 bei 60 Hz
TFT 20" Dell 20" 2007 FP 1600 x 1200 bei 60 Hz
TFT 22" Dell 22" E2210 1680 x 1050 bei 60 Hz
TFT 24" Dell 24" P2411H  1920 x 1080 bei 60 Hz
My questions are:
1. It seems clear to me, that from the above, Nr.3 T5500 should be selected, but maybe its overkill for Premiere Elements and its costly. What would you select?
2. What are the bottlenecks/shortcomings of the system you selected under question 1, beside the harddrive?
3. Whats, in your opinion, is the minimum requirement for a video editing Monitor?
4. If we just look at graphics performance and think about the price, could there be an alternative configuration like: Nr.2 plus a complete different graphics card?
5. Does the change to Premiere Elements have a big impact on graphics performance (same graphics card, different performance between Elements & Pro)?
6. Is there a list with compatible graphics cards that is available for Premiere Elements? (I just know the one for Premiere Pro)
Thanks a lot
manumanu

Welcome to the forums!  My suggestion is start and do extensive reading this forum.  Most of your questions have been discussed and answered. You are fortunate that your IT people have made you look at PC's as currently they outperform similar configured Mac's and cost you much less.
Stay away from single Xeon processor systems.  There is no advantage to a single Xeon processor over a single i7-9xx processor
If you want some real quick configuration performance information take a look at our PPBM5 Benchmark data.
If you have to go Dell plan on enhancing it with much lower cost add on's like disk drives and memory
If you want the best bang for the buck with a real system designed specifically for video editing look at ADK  
If you really want to edit you need 6 times your 4 GB configurations.
Stay away from the Quadro cards they currently do not improve the performance and they cost a lot.
SAS drives are good performers but are not ideal it is better to spend your money with 2 to 3 times more disk drives than a few expensive drives.

Similar Messages

  • I would like to build a desk top computer for video editing, business management and online learning and also have a small compatible laptop or tablet or ipad to take to university, Can someone please advise me of the best set up for this?

    I would like to build a desktop computer for video editing, business management and online learning and also have a small laptop, tablet or ipad to take to university, Can someone please advise me of the best set up for this?

    Let's see if I understand this...   You're asking for advice on building a desktop computer, in the Apple developer's forum?  Why not just buy a Mac?

  • Considering dumping my iMac for a PC used for DSLR video editing on Premiere CS6. Help!

    So I edit mostly 1080p DSLR footage taken from my canon T3i camera. I purchased a 2011 (the latest model) iMac a little over a year ago, upgraded the RAM to 12GB and it has worked reasonably well. I purchased the base model for $1200 which has a quad core i5 processor, 512mb of video ram, and a measly 500gb hard drive. The past couple of days I have come to the realization that I only use Adobe Programs for graphically intensive work (premiere, after effects, etc). I originally bought my iMac for final cut, but FCPX SUCKS and I switched to Premiere CS6 which works like a dream. Anyways, I'm a senior in high school and do lots of video editing (going to major in video production in college). I'm likely going to differ college for a year and continue my video production business (pretty informal) as well as video production internships at a couple companies (so don't suggest that I get a laptop for portability, not an issue). I just shot an entire wedding with 2 DSLR's and the footage takes up over 20% of my hard drive which is unacceptable. This is very troublesome for me and has been clogging up my computer considerably. I have realized it would make a lot of sense to sell my iMac and purchase a PC that's not only faster, but has much more space. I was ideally looking to sell my iMac for $1000, and from that get a better and faster PC setup for my video editing. $200 would be allocated for a 24" 1080p LED 5ms Asus monitor (from newegg) which would leave $800 remaining for the PC. Ideally it'd be nice to have a little cash left over. Some things that sound appealing to me are: an intel i7 quad core proccessor at least 3.0+ Ghz,  16 GB of ram (maybe 8 to start), 1 GB of video RAM (here is where I'm stuck, my Imac had a Radeon 512mb video card in it, but I've heard premiere runs especially well with nVidia CUDA cards? Don't really know too much about this stuff.) I have no idea what type of card to get, and if I would even see a performance upgrade from my iMac. For storage I'd like at least 2TB of space, should I get two seperate 1 TB drives? One for boot and software and another for video files? Anyways, I assume I can benefit from selling my 2011 i5 iMac to get a faster PC equivalent at a lower price since I mainly edit videos (which is pretty graphically intense) from an HD DSLR camera. I've noticed premiere rendering times on my mac are starting to get pretty slow these days. Ideally it'd be nice to buy a desktop (already assembled) maybe from HP for around $600 (not including the monitor). I'm not completely against building a PC from parts (since I know a friend who can do it for me) I just need help figuring out WHAT exactly it is that I need and would benefit from.

    Buy a Desktop Video Editing PC
    http://www.adkvideoediting.com/
    -ADK Kudos http://forums.adobe.com/thread/877201
    Build a Desktop Video Editing PC
    -http://ppbm7.com/index.php/intro-part-1
    -http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1098759
    -http://forums.adobe.com/thread/878520?tstart=0
    -http://forums.adobe.com/thread/815798
    -http://www.shawnlam.ca/2012/premiere-pro-cs6-video-editing-computer-build/
    -http://www.videoguys.com/Guide/E/Videoguys+DIY9+Its+Time+for+Sandy+Bridge+E/0xe9b142f408a2 b03ab88144a434e88de7.aspx

  • Suggestions for setting up external storage for video editing please?

    I am just starting up as a one-man video-editing business, using a 24 inch iMac running Snow Leopard, with Final Cut Studio. I have realised I'll need an external hard drive for HD footage, and I also need to get some back-up solution in place. Looking for speedy i/o, I would like to connect via the ethernet port (if only eSata was included in the iMac, eh!)
    I've been planning to get a Drobo, but looking around the forums I see that people say it's too slow for using as a working drive to keep all my source footage, so I've been looking at the G-tech 4 Tb, as it says it is designed for media-content production. Does anyone know if I could use two of the drives for working from and two as back up? Or would it be better to keep back-up entirely seperate, and get a Drobo for that for the G-tech to back up to?
    But I am also wondering whether a Mac Mini could be a worthwhile addition to this set up? I find myself sitting around waiting for rendering to complete on clips in my timeline (not to mention exporting to Quicktime conversion!), and I wondered if I put a Mac mini with Xserve installed (Apple store offers this with two 500gb hard drives inside), maybe I could farm the rendering out to the mini while I get on with editing on my iMac? That would require two installations of FCP, which I thought was allowed, but just today in a forum I saw that one would have to be a laptop... anyone have any suggestions for getting rendering done without stopping FCP from doing other things simultaneously?
    Also I don't know if that arrangement is even feasible... I see all these things like Xsan and Artbox... as a one workstation editing suite, does FCP handle all the dataflows for external working drive and external back ups okay without having to introduce more controllers?
    And can anyone explain to me how I could set up an ethernet connection to an external hard drive, or does that require the extra controllers mentioned above? I've seen it said that you can do it via ethernet, but haven't seen how you can actually go about doing it.
    Thanks for overlooking my newbie quality, any answers received with humble gratitude!
    Cheers, Syd

    Hi there,
    as NLEdit said, there will be loads of answers to this.
    IMO i'd avoid drobo like the plague. G tech drives have served me incredibly well working on a huge variety of broadcast projects (just over the water from you in Bristol), I've had no probs with FW800 when using DVCproHD, pro res is ok, sometimes a little slow with multiple layers and of course it eats up storage space. so I'd go for 2 4tb drives, keep the backup one in a different location.
    one tip that has saved me countless times is to format them as follows:-
    mac os extended (not journalled)
    create 2 partitions
    partition 1 - make this small (1gig) and call it "drive a - do not use"
    partition 2 - the rest of available storage and call "drive a"
    this is because the boot sector of the drive is within the first partition and with this method if it goes down it can be re erased without losing all your footage.
    If you call your backup drive the exact same name and have the exact same folder structure, you will not have to relink if you get a problem.
    Ignore getting a mac mini for rendering, won't help at all in FCP. instead I would make every attempt you can at buying a mac pro rather than an imac. much more expansion/speed possibilities and a more robust solution.
    best of luck
    Andy

  • Which do you think; Windows 7: 32-bit / 64-bit, (plus unused RAM issues) is best for video editing?

    Hi there!
    Just received delivery of a Lenovo G550 with the following spec:
    2.2Ghz Core 2 Duo,
    4GB (DDR3 - 1066Hz) RAM,
    500GB HDD
    NVIDIA GeForce G210M (512MB)
    Windows 7
    The entire purpose for buying this laptop, was for video editing and it is the best spec I could find for my needs and budget.
    So what's the problem?
    1) Windows 7 is installed as 32-bit, not 64 bit. Why is this? I was given no choice in this decision.
    2) Only 2.96GB of that juicey RAM is being used by Windows 7. I need as much RAM as possible for video editing.
    3) Lenovo sent NO install disc. - When I eventually get a virus or my HDD fails, I have NO WAY to clean install the very product I have just purchased! (A laptop with Windows 7 OS).
    Considerations:
    As I understand it (please comment if there are alternative views on this); The 64-bit architecture is only useful for compatible software which has been designed to run 64-bit.
    The video editing software I use is "Sony Vegas Movie Studio HD 9.0"
    The suggested problems with Windows 7 run as 64-bit include:
    * Possible lack of driver compatibility support.
    * Possibility of 32-bit programs running SLOWER in 64-bit environment, than their native 32-bit environment.
    * Higher running temperatures & processor cooling issues.
    * No performance gains for all other programs running as 32-bit (email, internet browser, etc).
    The suggested advantages with Windows 7 run as 64-bit could be:
    * Full utilisation of the 4GB RAM. (Presently limited to 2.96GB)
    * Faster rendering and video editing tasks in 64-bit environment.
    Questions:
    4) How can I get an install disc for Windows 7? Shouldn't this come with the computer?
    5) Do you think the potential hassle and architecture conflicts are worth suffering, to get the reported performance gains of 64-bit architecture and the remaining unused RAM?
    Thank you for any help and advice!

    contact lenovo support line for windows 7 dvds, but make sure if they send recovery dvds instead of windows 7 dvd.
    most of people are having trouble with installing windows and drivers, so companies has found as this as solution to send recovery dvd -if asked- or using hidden partition to recovery system - like one key recover - instead of.
    but if you ask me, they need to send dvds.
    i'll contact the mods and admins about this issue, please stay connected to this post.
    anyp wrote:
    the member should contact lenovo, as of recently users are entitled to request media for 32 / 64 bit if they purchased one and want the other.

  • Choosing an external hard drive for MacBook Pro video editing?

    This summer, I'll be taking an introductory video production/editing class, using Final Cut Express 4.
    I own a late 2009 MacBook Pro (2.26Ghz Core 2 Duo, 8GB RAM, FireWire 800, GeForce 9400M), which I'd like to use for editing at home, i.e. when I don't have access to the class video lab.
    I've heard that I should buy an external hard drive, so as not to fill up and wear out my laptop's 160GB hard drive.  Google returns a tsunami of information on hard drive choices, much of it undated, and mostly geared towards pro video editors.  Overwhelming, and not that helpful so far.
    For my basic needs, are all hard drives more or less interchangable?  Is one brand/model better suited for video editing (versus backups)?  What are the critical specs to consider?
    I hope to continue with movie-making as hobby - and to promote my small business - but I do not expect to put together a pro setup.
    Thanks.

    Get as big a firewire drive as you can afford, making sure it runs at 7200rpm.  Media files are huge:  regular DV is around 13GB/hour.  Most HD media is transcoded to Apple Intermediate Codec in FCE as it's ingested, around 40GB/hour.
    I've had very good luck with drives from Other World Computing (http://macsales.com/).  If you'll be transporting the drive between school and home regularly, I'd suggest a bus-powered drive, just because it's smaller.  Lots of folks in this forum swear by LaCie drives.

  • High Speed Fibre based video editing stations with Fibre RAID

    Hello. Thanks for checking my post. I hope I can find a solution here…
    So, my situation is this. There are two video editing stations (MacPro 8 Core 2.8Ghz/24GB RAM/4x1TB HD/sATA card/2-23” Cinema) in my office. Each tower has 4TB LaCie Biggest Quadra (through sATA connection).
    About 3 month ago, I started getting claims from those video editors that the file transfer speed is too slow for their work flow. Basically editors move video footages back and force between two LaCie scratch discs. They’ve tried through our office network (managed gigabit) first, but it was too slow for them. So, for an instant solution, I added sATA card on both towers. Then, I suggested them to use sATA direct connection and swap the drive as they need. However, it was almost impossible for both editors to eject/remove LaCie drive and swap out at the same time. (I didn’t think about their work flow…)
    So, they've been using gigabit network to copy files back and force. They do it at the end of the day since it takes many hours. Then, all of the sudden, we started getting very busy and amount of work has got almost doubled. Copy files through network takes all night. And when editors show up early enough morning, file copy is still going. So, we just need to find the better work flow now.
    Since then, I started researching online for solutions. I’ve actually visited a real video editing company and had a tour for hardware set up in San Francisco. I came up with, may be, two ways to resolve this, but I’m not sure. So, I would like your opinion.
    One is to use the 4GB Fibre switch, then add a new network storage device (may be 8 bay model for $5k+), which comes with Fibre connection. This was recommended by the real video editing company, but they didn’t know much about hardware manufacture. What they had was all high end models. Anyhow, in this way, two Macs and network storage will be connected through Fibre switch. If this seems to be a good solution for my case, does anyone have suggestions on brands/manufactures of Fibre switch, and also the network storage device (RAID) with Fibre connection? I’ve talked to FireWireDirect folks in TX, but they didn’t seem to be too helpful…
    Another possible solution, which is more complicated for me is to set up the new server just for the video editing macs with XSAN. After I read its description, it sure sounds like the best way for video, but…..1) its hardware requirement is high 2) Need a new server, 3) Need to buy Promise RAID? (not sure) 4) Needs Mac OS 10.5 server. So, this whole set up looks pretty challenging to me. We use 10.4 Server as our file server. So, I’ve no experience on 10.5.
    Anyhow, if any of you who are in the video industry have any suggestions, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you so much!

    Thank you very much for your info. I called CalDigit and a person told me that they 're releasing the new product within this quarter. So, I may need to wait till it comes out... As per CalDigit, there is no sharable RAID yet.
    So, I'm still curious, currently how are video editors using Network Storage Device (more than likely RAID) over the network without using SAN among several computers?
    I thought it was easy to find the RAID box with Fibre connection, but I guess not.
    Thank you again for your time. I appreciate it.

  • 21.5" i7 vs 27" i5 -- which is more powerful?  What about video editing?

    I'm trying to decide between a 21.5" iMac with 1TB and i7 and the next step up -- the 27" with an i5.
    My budget really was only for the 21.5 -- which comes out at 1699 -- the 27 would be 1999 --
    My main current needs are: Animation (Flash, etc), CS Suite (40 layer Photoshop), other programming (HTML, CSS, Canvas, etc), and music (8 analog in, effects, Logic).  I hope to start doing some HD video work (artistically) -- but due to focusing on music haven't really done much with it. 
    The person I spoke to at the store said if I were going to do "serious" video editing (Avid) then the 27" with the 1GB of memory on the video card would be better -- for video editing that is.  He said that for everything else (CS Suite, etc -- and I believe he said Final Cut as well) the i7 with the 512MB video card would be better.
    So -- here's the rub -- I'm on a limited budget and I think it might make more sense to put the extra 300 into RAM (they offered to bump the RAM to 12GB for $150 extra -- is that way too much?), or into an add'l monitor (I'm not taken with the glossy iMac screen as a main screen -- and that's also why the 27" screen wouldn't do much for me).  I do want to do some video production, but I don't plan on getting Avid or anything like that anytime in the foreseeable future -- I'd probably be doing 10 min video pieces and for what I currently need the computer for the i7 with more RAM is much better.  I just don't want to feel totally stupid down the road.
    So:
    21.5" iMac, 2.8 GHz i7, 1TB drive, 12GB RAM, Radeon 6750 with 512MB RAM
    vs
    27" iMac, 2.7 GHz i5, 1TB drive, 4 GB RAM, Radeon 6970 with 1GB RAM
    Thanks

    Similar question ... looking at nearly identical cost: 21" i7 2.8 vs. 27" i5 - both with the 512 6750 video card.  (I'll buy my RAM upgrade on-line - will take either one to 16GB.)
    Both have same video memory.  I don't feel I need the bigger screen size if the processing power is a better value for video (can always add another, larger monitor).
    This will be a video & audio editing computer.  I have a TON of old Hi8 home movies to move to digital for archive and eventual editing, will capture via firewire Digital 8 Handicam.
    My main new video projects will be <10 min - primarily for web delivery.  Business sales/education and training.  Pretty sure I'll want to upgrade with FCPX.  I'm a believer in that you can always compress quality down, you can't enhance poor quality source up.
    I have a background in video production (20 years ago), no expreience with NLE, but want to get back in.
    I guess the i7 power will hold up longer and allow for growth of my abilities/uses of the software down the line ...
    Maybe I've answered my own (& the OP's question) ...

  • Music Video Editing 101

    I posted this a few years back - before it rolled off the end of the discussions, I moved it to Dave Slater's ProAppTips.com which is currently in limbo due to hacker problems, but he retrieved the text for me and I thought it might be handy to post now. I should update it for using MultiClips, but they can be problematic, depending on how the video was shot and the timing/overlap of the coverage available (see: MultiCam and Music Videos). For now, I'll just post it as it was originally written.
    _*Music video editing 101*_
    Although I've cut probably over 250 music videos, this is only how I work. What works for you may be entirely different and more productive for you. I am not here to champion these techniques and I invite anyone else to post how they do it.
    Okay down to business. Digitizing material: I capture all the available material, preferably in 20-30 minute chunks. Among other things, the large chunks can come in handy if there is a discrepancy between the timecode on the offline tapes and the master tapes. I watch the material as it comes in and note anything of interest (cool shots, etc). After capture, I go thru and put markers at the start of each take and scene. I'll go into the philosophy of logging/overlogging later.
    Now, music videos can most often be divided into two sections - performance and concept (or story). The first thing to tackle is the performance. Not only is this locked to the areas of the song being performed (barring cheating choruses or other repeating stuff), but it helps you to know where you want to put the story (which is where your performance coverage is the weakest).
    How I cut performance is this. First, I try to pick a good overall base take of performance - this is often a wider shot that covers the whole band. I usually have chosen this take while watching the material as I capture. I put the master audio in the sequence and cut this video take onto V1. This is because I find it easier to cut into something rather than cut a shot into black. Now I go back and start at the first take and hopefully there was a smart slate used, but however I do it, I get the take lined up so that the frame in the viewer is at the same point in the song as the frame in the canvas, then set gang sync (I have a this mapped to a keypress).
    I then play what I have in the viewer until I see something I like. Now, because I've ganged the edit with this take, it's been following along, so I can quickly pop over to see what is at that point in my edit and see if what I just saw in the take looks better. If it does, I cut it in, If not, I can ignore it, or cut it onto V2/V3/V4, etc and set its visibility off (ctrl-b). Why would I do that? Maybe later I need to change the shot because the singer doesn't like himself from that side, or I need more shots of the drummer, or I've changed the edit and the shot doesn't work anymore, or maybe I'll be able to cheat it in at another point of the song. The point is, I'm going thru the material now and I might as well save anything I like so I won't have to look for it later. Tossing it onto a higher video track keeps it in sync with where it should fall in the song.
    Now go I back and keep playing the take and when I see the next thing I like, repeat the process. I continue this until I've finished the take. Then I repeat this for all takes. It's time consuming, but I've found it to be the only way to ensure you've given due consideration to all the material and you can say you have the strongest performance in your edit. And your goal is to make a performance cut so tight that it will be painful to give up areas of it to concept. I also keep a bin/sequence of non-sync cutaways - maybe a drum hit, maybe a look from the lead singer, maybe a bass riff. These are important to your cut, but you can treat them like concept - i.e. you can put them anywhere you need to.
    When you've finished your performance cut, duplicate your sequence (You might also have done this during stages of your performance cut, just to keep backups). The reason you want to now is to always have a pure performance cut to go back to.
    Now consider the concept. Sometimes it warrants cutting it all together as a story complete, other times it will only function as cutaways or it illustrates specific lines in the song, etc. However you get the concept organized, the performance cut will provide a roadmap as to where to place the concept. Sometimes it's blatantly obvious (like you have no performance for a certain area), other times (if you've done a good job on the performance cut) it will be a struggle to find where to put it. I always keep my performance on its own layer/s and add a new layer for the concept. This is to allow ease of re-arranging the story. If you have it on its own layer, you won't need to replace the missing performance if you shift the concept around, you'll just reveal the existing (wonderfully tight) performance below.
    I could go on and on about this, but those are the basics. As to timing, I usually allow myself 2 days for capture and performance cut. Third day is concept. Fourth day massaging the overall edit. Send off that night for comments. Fifth day is changes from artist/label/management. Lather, rinse, repeat.
    Finally a bit about logging of footage. When I first started editing, it was on a linear, tape-based system. So I had a wall of thermal printouts to guide me to my selects and whenever I needed a specific shot, it usually involved a lot of shuttling thru tape. An inevitable beneficial fallout of this work flow is that I'd often find a better shot than the one I was searching for, simply because I had to shuttle to find my intended shot.
    This fostering of happy accidents was lost when I started editing non-linear. Because I could instantly go where ever I wanted, I only ever found what I wanted and lost a certain spontaneity to my edits. They became more predictable. It took me a little while to realize this and to come up with some solutions.
    First of all, I don't overlog footage. None of this clips named "The one where Jack finds the beans and discovers the true meaning of friendship in wide shot with the cow OOF over his right shoulder (sky has clouds)". I make it so I always know where to find my shot, but not so I can just get there without shuttling a bit. Also, I try to keep a sequence of selects. Shots that I like, but haven't found a use for yet. Thats where I always go to find a shot I need - that way, shuttling thru the sequence, I am exposed to shots that I know are good and may be better than the shot I think I am looking for.
    Anyone else want to post their work flow?
    Patrick

    Great workflow Patrick. The one main thing missing that I use in music video editing is the grouping of multiclips to group all of your performance takes into one clip. For those that haven't used this then you have access to all performance takes at any given point in the song. This is handy as you might have 50 to 100 takes on some videos. The thing that makes a grouping of multiclips easy is the use of a timecode slate and an audio master (though aux code grouping can be done without it). You then assign an auxiliary timecode to each take and group your mulitclip by that. In avid land I subclip a masterclip by takes. Unfortunately Apple has done a really dumb thing in FCP. When you make subclips from a master clip and assign auxiliary timecode it will ripple the aux code of other subs from the master clip. Completely useless for music video. The solution is to capture each take in its own master clip but that is a long and tedious log that for me is totally not needed for a music video. I wish Apple would address this (it as been discussed in this thread) but it has been unchanged since the introduction of multiclips. That's why I always cut my music videos in Avid.

  • Is photoshop good enough for video editing ?.

    Hi.
    Is photoshop good enough for video editing ?.
    Thanks.

    As DSLRs and cameraphones have added the ability to produce short videos, Photoshop has added that feature in for convenience.
    This should clear up the question for you.
    http://www.adorama.com/alc/0013918/article/Editing-Video-in-Photoshop-Ep-114-DSLR-Video-Sk ills-with-Rich-Harrington-Ador…
    Of course  it's not going to put Adobe Premiere or Final Cut Pro out of business.
    Gene

  • Best Video Editing Tool For MBP

    Hey Fellas recently i switched from a windows pc to MBP. I have a small business of making motion movies for various clients of mine. On windows based platform i used "Pinnacle Studio 15" for editing my videos And it worked fine there. Now as i switched to MBP, i also transformed to pinnacle studio for mac. But there seems some kind of error when i go make movie option, the movie doesnot proceed at all.
    Really frustated for this kind of problem as i have tried many times and also replaced the clips many times but its doesn't work.
    Please help me, fast answers would be really appreciated as i have many more projects to cover up.
    Thanks

    mac-a-damia wrote:
    I do not have pinnacle installed on my computer right now. Check this out maybe it can help you http://www.wondershare.com/video-editing-tips/pinnacle-for-mac.html
    Thanks for the link mac-a-dania. But these are only tips for running the studio but not the problem that i m asking.
    Thanks anyways.

  • Feedback request for First PC Build - For video editing (Premiere, AE)

    Hey guys. This is going to be my first PC Build, and I've been researching for weeks to put together parts to build a balanced system that is affordable but will still perform solidly. Since I am so new at this, most of this PC jargon is extremely new to me. I would just build it, but for me this is a lot of money, and I want to double check with some more experienced people that this is a solid build before stepping forward.
    I've recently started my own videography business, and I need to build something that will allow me to edit and add effects more efficiently. I don't need the best in the game, but I do need to upgrade from my current system. I edit almost entirely DSLR footage. I mostly use Premiere, but am learning AE, and hope to implement it a lot more in the near future. Anyway, if you have time to look it over, I really appreciate any feedback you are willing to give!!
    -Does everything fit?!
    -Is this system balanced?
    -Are there any bottlenecks?
    -Anything overkill?
    -How upgradeable is it?
    -Is there anything worth upgrading now rather than later?
    -Also, are there other sites to find these parts cheaper?
    Component
    Choice
    Link
    MOBO
    ASRock Z77 Extreme4 LGA 1155 Intel Z77 HDMI SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX Intel Motherboard
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813157293
    CPU
    Intel Core i7-3770K Ivy Bridge 3.5GHz 3.9GHz Turbo LGA 1155 77W Quad-Core Intel HD Graphics 4000
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116501
    GPU
    EVGA GeForce GTX  650Ti BOOST SuperClocked 2GB 192-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 SLI Support Video Card
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130910
    Memory
    G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800) Desktop Memory Model F3-1600C9Q-32GXM
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231569
    Drives
    SAMSUNG 840 Pro Series MZ-7PD128BW 2.5" 128GB SATA III MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD)
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820147192
    Western Digital WD Black WD2002FAEX 2TB 7200 RPM 64MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive - OEM
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136792
    Cooling
    COOLER MASTER Hyper 212 EVO RR-212E-20PK-R2 Continuous Direct Contact 120mm Sleeve CPU Cooler Compatible with latest Intel 2011/1366/1155 and AMD FM1/FM2/AM3+
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835103099
    Power Supply
    CORSAIR HX Series HX750 750W ATX12V 2.3 / EPS12V 2.91 SLI Ready CrossFire Ready 80 PLUS GOLD Certified Modular Active PFC Power Supply New 4th Gen CPU Certified Haswell Ready
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139010
    Optical Drive
    LG Black 14X BD-R 2X BD-RE 16X DVD+R 5X DVD-RAM 12X BD-ROM 4MB Cache SATA BDXL Blu-ray Burner, Bare Drive, 3D Play Back (WH14NS40) - OEM
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16827136250
    Case
    COOLER MASTER HAF 932 Advanced RC-932-KKN5-GP Black Steel ATX Full Tower Computer Case with USB 3.0, Black Interior and Four Fans-1x 230mm front RED LED fan, 1x 140mm rear fan, 1x 230mm top fan, and 1x 230mm side fan
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811119160

    In addition to what cc_merchant has said, my only comments to add would be to consider the new Haswell platform and/or the Nvidia 700 series cards that recently came out.
    Depending on how soon you need this machine, it may be worth your while to get a 4770k and Z87 mobo. (You might want to wait for the C2 stepping to hit shelves, as the current C1 offerings have a USB 3.0 bug). I've read that the C2 version should hit shelves early to mid August.
    As for the videocard, Nvidia just released the Gtx 760, which would be a much stronger offering for a little bit more money. (Some here might argue that it is overkill for that machine, but I think the future proof aspect makes it worth it).
    For the hard drives, below is the hypothetical scenario I plan to go with when I build my system (per Harm's instructions):
    C:\  OS, Programs, Windows Pagefile - 128GB Samsung 840 Pro SSD
    D:\  Projects and Media - 3TB Seagate 7200.14 HDD
    E:\  Media Cache / Scratch - RAID 0, 2x 1TB Seagate 7200.14 HDD
    F:\  Misc/Non-Video Editing Hard Drive - 1TB WD Caviar Black
    Exports go to whichever drive has space available.
    If you're only able to afford one of these upgrades, I would focus on getting the optimum hard drive setup. Right now, that's your bottleneck.
    Hope that helps.

  • Are iMac's good for professional video editing?

    Are iMac's good for professional video editing (and these other apps)?, if so what one is the best
    Software i would like to run (and run fast):
    Final Cut Pro 7/X      
    Premier Pro
    Avid
    Motion 5
    Colour
    After Effects
    Photoshop
    and maybe a copple of games such as the elder scrolls online, gta 5 (when it comes to Mac/PC) and skyrim (with mods)

    Yes, I'd urge  you to visit your local Apple Store and ask your quesitons. You may want to speak to their business professional who may have more expertise than your everyday consumer sales people.

  • I am a YouTuber seeking a video editing program to replace Pinnacle Studio 14.

    Hi there,
    I am a YouTuber seeking a video editing program to replace Pinnacle Studio 14. Pinnacle does not accept MOV files apparently requiring me to reduce the vid quality in order to create a new file type to edit. Also, edit video preview rendering takes forever.
    I have a Sony Vaio 32 bit with Intel i5 Core, 4gb RAM.  I might get a new laptop soon.
    My editing needs are:
    -I want to be able to edit the original file without having to make a reduced quality or wait forever for preview rendering to work
    -Ability to edit MOV files and also common MP4 files
    -I want to be easy-to-use
    -I want to be able to add up to 2 audio tracks
    -I need to be able to add video overlay
    -I need to be able to add JPG and PNG files
    -I need to be able to preview 2-3 videos in a small preview (as many YouTubers do at the end of their videos)
    Please let me know
    which of your programs you recommend,
    the price,
    if I can download it,
    can I transfer the program download to other another laptop if I get a new one or reinstall if here if my computer ever crashes,
    Is there a money-back return guarantee and if so what’s the time period for that?
    Thanks.

    I came from the studio environment years ago.  Adobe Premiere is a very powerful editing suite.  But with power comes complexity.  You will experience a steep learning curve, but one that ultimately pays in benefits.  Each time you start the program it will use the internet to confirm you are an authorized user.
    In Premiere Pro, your editing is done on the native files in a non-destructive manner.  there is no low-resolution version.  That said, you can change the resolution of your preview screens if your PC is under powered.  Rendering of previews happen in the background, aided by the Mecury GPU capability.  Once your editing is done, you export the project to a new file of the format you seek as output.  Edit once, output many.
    Video and audio tracks are relatively unlimited in number.
    JPG and PNG are native still files.
    There is guidance elsewhere on this web site as to the hardware you need to run the software--consider these to be minimums, not optimum.
    Adobe is marketing its Creative Cloud suite of applications as a subscription basis. You will download the programs you want to use onto your hardware.  Since you have a subscription, moving the subscription to another machine is something you can do yourself.  Adobe gets involved only if you activate it on more computers than your license allows.  The program does give you option to deactivate the installation so as to enable it being relocated. 

  • Good video editing software?

    anyone have any preferred video editing software? why do you like it? mainly looking at openshot/kdenlive/pitivi.. but haven't done much video editing in the past so not sure which I should go with. any thoughts?

    Army wrote:
    I made a video once and used openshot for it. Back then version 1.0 was the most up to date stable release. There was no undo function etc. But still, it worked quite well. But I think kdenlive is better, but it's a KDE application, so it's pretty fat on a wm only environment.
    I'd say, you should give them all a try, it's a matter of taste and it depends on what you want to do. I'd recommend openshot.
    As someone who currently has openshot 1.1.3 installed, I can confirm there is now an undo option.

Maybe you are looking for