Video much too dark in FCP compared to iMovie

NB I mistakenly asked this question in the Final Cut Pro X forum and should really have posted it here
Bit of a newcomer to this but as I have Final Cut Pro 7 thought I'd use it rather than iMovie which seems a bit primitive.
Shot a video of someone in the studio yesterday on a Nikon DSLR at 1280x720 25fps
Then ran it through Compressor to transcode it to Apple Pro Res for editing.
All ok so far
Viewed the footage in iMovie and it looks fine but what a horror in FCP7 !!!
It is so dark
So what's wrong ?
Have seen an earlier discussion which seemed to think the monitor calibration is off but how can that be ?
iMovie displays the footage fine but FCP doesn't.
Any thoughts guys ?
See the attached screen grab
As you can see: FCP Viewer on top and iMovie below
The latest reply I have received was the following from Meg the Dog and it certainly helps but is not a complete solution so I'd appreciate any further views:
In FCP-7 go to the menu Final Cut Pro > System Settings.
When the System Settings Pane opens, click on the Playback Tab.
Set Gamma Correction to Approximate:

Well iMovie seems to "read" ProRes fine as I made no additional adjustment to the image clip to view it (and after all it is an Apple codec so iMovie should be able to read it).
As I am a professional photographer my monitors are regularly profiled and I have no issues with the colour range, gamut and birghtness - indeed the iMovie output very closely matches the still shots that I did at the same time.
Of course I have no control over the monitor conditions you may be viewing it under.
Having made the adjustment that Meg the Dog suggested has indeed brought the FCP image more into line with the "correct" out put as displayed by iMovie but not all the way there - see the new image here:
You can now see that the player's hat is now visible but the gamma is still off - needs a higher gamma and possibly a little more brightness (exposure) too.
It is however workable and I will attempt to edit the footage now and if necessary tweak it to ensure a good output video.
When I compare this odd discrepancy with what I have come to expect from still photo editing programs I am a little bemused; If I make image adjustments in Lightroom, save the file, and then open in Preview/ Photoshop/ Aperture the image appears much as I expected it to (ie like the Lightroom output)
Why then am I having this enormous difference between iMovie and FCP7 ?
Come on Apple - there must be a simple solution to this.

Similar Messages

  • Why is my video appearing too dark on FCP?

    I just shot a video with a Canon XA10, using the "Night scene" setting. The footage looked dark, but I could still see the images on the screen. (It looked as dark as I wanted it to)  Now, I'm logging and transferring, and the preview window is close to black.
    On my camera's viewfinder, it looks great! Is there a setting in Final Cut Pro's Logging and Transferring that is off?
    -All my other footage looks normal, Just sequences attempting to be dark, come out different
    -Its a AVCHD camera
    Thanks!

    Camera viewfinders are notorious for displaying an inaccurate image. They are often set to show a "bright" more vibrant image.
    Equally, FCP shows you a proxy image intended to deal with composition and action. And the third variable is - who knows how well your computer monitor is adjusted?
    The only real way to see what you have recorded is to view it on an external TV monitor being fed a TV signal. To do this, you need a qualified i/o device (from Matrox, AJA, Decklink) to convert the FCP output signal then feed it to a properly adjusted TV.
    Anything else is just guesswork. Really.
    x

  • MacBook Pro to TV, Video Output Too Dark

    Hi,
    I have an 2010 model 15" MacBook Pro i5.
    I got this video converter for Christmas:
    http://www.amazon.com/VideoSecu-VGA2TV-Computer-Presentation-Converter/dp/B000X3 FAJU/ref=sr14?ie=UTF8&qid=1295210644&sr=8-4
    Using this in conjunction with an Apple Mini DisplayPort-to-VGA adapter and a standard RCA video cable, I am able to connect my MacBook to my TV so I can stream video from sites like Hulu.
    My TV is a Sanyo flat screen CRT that's, probably, 6-7 years old (exact model probably isn't important).
    I have no issues with the quality of the video output I'm getting (i.e. resolution, color). The issue I'm having is that the video is too dark. The video looks great on my MacBook screen, but the TV display is too dark. I have tried playing with the settings on the TV and on the converter (through which I can adjust brightness, contrast, saturation, hue, and sharpness) and I can't, for the life of me, get the output to my TV brightened up to an acceptable level.
    I have tried to use the display calibration tool in the Mac's display preferences and that didn't seem to help (I'll admit that I don't think I'm doing it correctly).
    Can anyone suggest some steps that I might try in order to improve my video output?
    Thanks.

    No Answer, but related problem...please see my original post: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2773439&stqc=true

  • Videos are too dark to watch on Macbook pro?

    Ever since I got my Macbook pro a year ago, videos are too dark to watch at any setting.

    Hi Paul,
    Sorry for the late answer. I live in Europe, so that's why I was asleep ;-)
    Basically the command tells your computer to unhide everything on your Desktop, so if you don't have a Desktop, something is definitely wrong.
    My guess is that there's something wrong with your account on that computer. You can check that by creating a new account in System Preferences (click on Accounts, click the lock in the bottom-left corner and then click the "+" button just above).
    Then try mounting "some" media and see if it appears on the new user's Desktop. If not, I would highly recommend to reinstall Mac OS X.
    HTH,
    Jasper.

  • Prints are much too dark

    I have just received prints of several landscapes that looked great on screen. Prints are real disappointment as much too dark, although still really sharp and colours OK. Views are all JPEGs from iPhoto 5, converted using iPhoto from Canon RAW - have just transferred a couple to a PC and the PC image is much like the print - too dark. Have tried adjusting brightness on PowerBook screen to same as print, but print is darker! Anyone experienced this - and what is the fix?

    I have just received prints of several landscapes that looked great on screen. Prints are real disappointment as much too dark, although still really sharp and colours OK. Views are all JPEGs from iPhoto 5, converted using iPhoto from Canon RAW - have just transferred a couple to a PC and the PC image is much like the print - too dark. Have tried adjusting brightness on PowerBook screen to same as print, but print is darker! Anyone experienced this - and what is the fix?

  • Photoshop saves JPEG images much too dark--any ideas?

    Hi there, I'm having an issue with my Photoshop applications and I was hoping someone could give me a little insight/help in fixing the problem.
    When working with a file in Photoshop (I am an artist, so I usually create my files from scratch rather than loading them from a camera), I can get the colors to appear as they should in the workspace. When I finish artwork, I make sure the colors are exactly as I want them, then save it as a JPEG file. However, if I open this JPEG file in any application--browsers, photo viewing programs--it is extremely dark and saturated. If I open the JPEG in Photoshop, though, it looks fine. This issue seems to have occurred spontaneously 3-4 months ago. I don't recall changing or deleting any of my monitor or video card preferences, or my color profiles. I was working with Photoshop Elements 4.0 at the time, and it suddenly started happening.
    Now, I have found a sort of work-around for it. If I screencap my workspace with the artwork open in it, then I can open up that screencap in Photoshop. The colors are much TOO bright and washed out when I do this, but if I crop the image so it's just the artwork and save it, then it displays in browsers and viewing programs more or less as it should, i.e. how I see it in Photoshop. However, if I open that JPEG in Photoshop, it will display much brighter than the original artwork.
    It's not a desperate issue since I have this weird work-around, but I'm currently trying to save images for printing--which means they need to be very large, and I'm not keen on zooming to 100% and screen-capping the art piece by piece, then stitching it all together before saving it. I'd really like to get this issue resolved. I thought it might have to do with the fact that I was using outdated software (PSE 4.0), but I've just recently upgraded to CS5 Extended and the same issue prevails.
    If it's any help, I'm working on an HP EliteBook 8740w, with Windows 7 and an NVIDIA Quadro video card.
    Here are the things I've tried, which haven't worked:
    Deleting Photoshop preferences/settings (in both PSE 4.0 and CS5)
    Uninstalling and re-installing both programs
    Re-calibrating my monitor
    Changing color settings in Photoshop (files still end up dark regardless)
    Disabling OpenGL Drawing
    Switching between file types when saving
    I am at my wit's end! I am mostly concerned that my clients and professors aren't going to see my work as it is intended to look, when they view it online. The erratic behavior of too-dark or too-light, and my pictures seemingly never displaying correctly on any browser or in any program, has me a little paranoid about my online portfolio, haha. I'm applying for an art scholarship in a month, and if none of my work will save correctly (much less print correctly!) then it will be a sad day indeed!
    As I said before, this problem seems to have popped up out of nowhere. My artwork from before the whole saving-too-dark issue began still displays perfectly in most programs, but the rest is totally hit-and-miss. If any of you have fixes or suggestions (even suggestions on adjusting Photoshop so that my images display more consistently in browsers and other programs) I would be extremely grateful.
    Thanks so much for your time,
    -Jenna

    Though you have solved your problem, be aware, that different applications have different ways to interpret color profiles that can be set in different ways.
    Example:
    In Firefox, you can either set a color profile or not -- AFAIK, it only works with v2 ICC profiles (vs. v4, v3 seems to have not been released).
    From that point, you can set perceptual, absolute, colormetric, or one other...(forget)... but usually you just set that to perceptual for monitor work as I understand it.  Then a 3rd FF setting (all in its registry, of course, though occasionally there are extensions that let you manage the three settings.  They correspond to values (accessible through 'about:config' in FF's address window), all under the prefix:
    "gfx.color_management."
    "display_profile"  -  text string of file containing a v2 ICC profile, usually in "C:\Windows\System32\Spool\drivers\color\" (at least on Win7) -- extention ".icm"
    "mode" -- when to turn it on (2=for pics that have profiles set, another is for always (1?)), maybe 0=off?
    "rendering_intent" - this corresponds to perceptual, abs, colormetric, types, I think 0=perceptual (default)
    for FF, if you google one of those values, you'll find more info on some mozillian-type site... "prefix<keyname>" (e.g. -  gfx.color_management.display_profile ).
    Other progs may have their own or if we are lucky would use the system profile & color management system (assuming it is any good).
    Getting an accurate monitor profile and keeping it updated as your monitor 'decays' (i.e. color is usually best when new, then they decay, w/useful life at max gamut ~ 18 months (in my experience), after that, you can still retune to the same white point, but with a loss of gamut due to the phosphors decaying at different rates).
    It's best to use some sort of external calibration HW... -- as an external device looking at your monitor through it's various colors is the only way to get a 'digitally objective' measurement.  That said, I always have concerns about the stability of the measuring device over time.  Does it have components that  that could cause non-linear measurement?  Am guessing not as likely, as it isn't emitting anything so less wear & tear, but I wouldn't assume it's 100% accurate over time either (but certainly is better than one's own eye which can gradually adjust to just about anything).  I had a viewsonic when I first got my current color device (a Spyder3), and it had gone from an original white point of 6500K down to 5700K -- and I had not noticed the difference (over 18-20 months)...
    I could bring it back in range, but had lost gamut, and was a bit below the sRGB (consumer grade) standard (which is some fractional
    value of the Adobe Photoshop or NTSC standards, which are similar in the size of their ranges, but slightly offset from each other).
    The result of all this -- I never really know how my images will look on other monitors, but I try to tag them w/my current monitor profile, hoping that if they care about color, they'll have some SW on their end that can make sense of it...but given my own experience in how SW on the same system handles color differently, I wouldn't say they were 'high hopes'... ;-)

  • Installed Yosemite and iPhoto 9.6. A lot of my photos are much too dark now and the colour is not right. Any fix available? I did a backup prior to the new installs.

    Installed Yosemite and iPhoto 9.6. A lot of my photos are now too dark and the colour is way off from the originals. Any suggestions to correct this mess. I did a backup prior to installing Yosemite and iPhoto 9.6.

    Check the monitor settings in the System/Displays/Color preference pane.  You may have to change the color profile used or calibrate the monitor. 
    Also check the System/Accessibility preference pane to see if the Increase contrast checkbox is checked. If it is check it and see if there's any improvement.

  • The passive tabs on Firefox 29 are much too dark!

    The dark gray background doesn't provide enough contrast for the title of the tab, so it takes an extra moment to read it. That's a time-waster and a nuisance. Is a fix in the works?

    winsbury, I am just another Firefox user, not a Developer and have not closely followed the bugs, I did however see one for Firefox for fix to a problem with Ububtu, and IIRC another about contrasting toolbars on Windows.
    Personally I would have thought it was not an ideal design and against accessibility policies to deliberately make tabs disappear into a background without being easy to reverse. I will tag this as escalate. Let's see how HelpDesk staff respond.

  • Streaming Video, iTunes rentals are too dark.  Help!

    Using a 2013 Macbook Air, pretty much fully loaded.
    I'm noticing that movies purchased on iTunes, as well as Handbrake rips of my own DVDS, and streaming through both Amazon Prime and Netflix, using MS Silverlight and Quicktime... all videos are too dark.  Or rather, the shadows, and blacks are all too dark.  I have worked with display calibration and am convinced that calibration is not the real issue here.  While using my photo editing software, Lightroom 3, there are no such problems.  It is only the video playback.
    Is anyone else having the same issue?  I had a 2012 MB Air which didn't seem to have this problem as badly as this one. 
    Looking for solutions. 
    Thanks!

    I have gone through calibration.  Please note that other applications, such as Lightroom appear as they should.  I also have a spyder, and though I haven't calibrated this monitor, the fact that non-video applications are appearing as they should tells me that the problem is probably with the application running the video playback, or something do to with the video processor.  Also note that the problem occurs with both Amazon streaming, Netflix, and videos ripped with Handbrake, and that it occurs with MS Silverlight, Quicktime and with VLC player. 
    I read some discussion streams from 2012 with the same problem, and calibration was not the issue.  I have tried every built in display profile, manually gone through calibration in "expert" mode, etc... I just don't think this is the real issue.  Nor does it appear to be a hardware issue.  At least not the monitor.  Other applications are working just fine.

  • IMovie to iDVD--Video too dark, sound too loud--Help!

    I created three iMovie projects for my son's swim team, then made a DVD using iDVD. It was fine when viewed in iDVD's preview, but when burned to the DVD-R the video was too dark and the sound was way too loud. This is footage taken on a Sony digital camcorder (DCR-TRV11).
    I did the iDVD project by starting from scratch from within iDVD, then dragging the iMovie pieces and still images into the iDVD project. The iMovie pieces were prepared by using Share to make them into "full quality" .dv movies.
    When I play the finished DVD on my iMac, there are no unusual problems with the video or audio. It looks and sounds like it did when played from the digital camcirder. But when played on both of my standalone DVD players + TVs, the video is too dark and the audio is much too loud.
    Any idea why this is, and to fix it? I don't find a way to reduce the audio volume in iMovie. Maybe there is a workaround using the Relative Volume feature, but all my clips have a similar sound level. Any help will be appreciated.
    --Eric
    iMac G5   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  

    when burned to the DVD-R the video was too dark
    They is a VERY slight darkening during the MPG-2 compression process (see my pages Digital Video Color Bars Test at http://homepage.mac.com/profpixel/color_bars/colorbars.htm and iMovie HD and iDVD 5 Gray Patch Test at http://homepage.mac.com/profpixel/gray_patches/graypatches.htm )
    I suspect what you are seening is a major difference in brightness/contrast between your computer monitior and your TV set (and in fact you admit this: "When I play the finished DVD on my iMac, there are no unusual problems with the video or audio. It looks and sounds like it did when played from the digital camcirder. But when played on both of my standalone DVD players + TVs, the video is too dark and the audio is much too loud.") so you aren't seeing an iDVD problem.

  • Video too dark on batch capture

    I have a Canopus ACVC110 converter for importing analog video sources that's hooked into one of my firewire ports. When I go to log and caputure my DVD player menu (ie. the one that says "JVC") looks fine in the preview window. However, once I play the DVD, the video looks too dark. What can I adjust so that the video I'm importing doesn't get captured at such a low video level? Thanks.

    There is a good chance the DVD you are copying has some form of macrovision copyright protection. This would explain why the DVD appears really dark when you try to capture it using the ACVC110.
    Some Canopus converters have undocumented ways to bypass macrovision, but your model doesn't offer that.
    If you are legally copying a DVD, you may have to use another method, like routing it through a Time Base Corrector which will regenerate the video stream or transfering it digitally using a program like mpeg streamclip.
    -Alexi

  • CS3 printing too dark - works in CS2

    Hi,
    I've just upgraded to CS3 and everything seems to work EXCEPT printing. The pictures print but are much much too dark compared to CS2. The CS2 photoshop prints are what I see on the monitor and has worked for a couple of years.
    I've tried to make all the CS3 settings the same as CS2 but I must be missing something.
    I've set the print setup to:
    "Let Printer determine Colors" and "relative colormetric" so that the printer applies the ICC profiles, not Photoshop.
    I make sure the printer driver dialog is set to "ICC" and "relative colormetric".
    I've set the "color settings" under edit to be the same as my CS2 settings.
    In everything I'm using the same color spaces in CS3 that I use in CS2.
    So, what have I forgotten?
    Thanks

    > So, Eric, you are saying we need to Convert to a space (or gamma) in
    > Photoshop before Command+P -- because the Epson Adv B&W driver will
    > assume a color space/gamma -- what would that assumption be based on
    > (gamma of our Mac default MonitorRGB)? Assuming I am not talking
    > about feeding the Epson grayscale.
    Yes.
    The ABW driver wants to be fed gamma 2.2-encoded image data.
    This is why my standard recommendation for printing to the ABW driver __ONLY__ is to use:
    Color Handling = Photoshop Manages Colors
    Printer Profile = Adobe RGB
    Rendering Intent = Relative Colorimetric
    Black Point Compensation = Enabled
    Why does this work? Because no matter what your image working space is (e.g., sRGB, Adobe RGB, ProPhoto RGB, Apple RGB, ColorMatch RGB, etc.), doing this will cause your image data to be encoded in gamma 2.2 before the data gets passed off to the driver. (Adobe RGB has a gamma encoding of 2.2.)
    The same workflow will work in Lightroom, too. You just need to check the "Display Profiles" checkbox in Lightroom to access Adobe RGB when selecting a printer profile.
    If you are in grayscale mode instead of RGB mode, choose "Gray Gamma 2.2" instead of "Adobe RGB" for the printer profile.
    However, the catch is that -- as noted in this thread -- there is currently a glitch, which we (Adobe + Apple + Epson) are investigating. One of the symptoms of that glitch is that the above suggested workflow does not work on Leopard.
    > Does this CS4-Apple-Epson issue have anything to do with some users
    > reporting dark prints in Photoshop Manage Color - No Color
    > Adjustment Epson workflow? -- For example, someone using 1.8 gamma
    > Monitor RGB...
    Unlikely.

  • Images too dark on Samsung monitor - please help!

    We've just upgraded a Samsung 21" monitor to a Samsung 30" (305T).
    In just TWO applications, Photoshop CS3 and Windows Photo Gallery (Vista64), all photographic images are much too dark. Not subtly, about 3-4 f-stops too dark.
    EVERY other of our applications INCLUDING ADOBE BRIDGE AND FIREWORKS, and even Photoshop itself during Save to Web, displays the photos as they should appear.
    I've tried setting various profiles in Windows Color Management as the default, including the ICC profile sRGB IEC61966-2.1 (which my reading says we should be using), as well as WCS profiles sRGB virtual and scRGB virtual, and tried using no profile at all. None of these changes makes any apparent difference at all to the images we're seeing.
    In Photoshop, I've tried various options too. If set to Monitor Color (Monitor RGB - * wscRGB) Photoshop then displays images as it should. However the Camera Raw display when loading Nikon images is still much too dark, and the Photoshop Save to Web images are much too light. Arrrgh!
    The monitor does not include any driver software, just electronic documentation (poorly edited) which offers no advice about this. I've seen references to various Gamma utilities, but not sure that's what I need. Is it?
    Any help or suggestions would be much appreciated!
    TIA

    Thanks Peter & Sid. I appreciate the advice, but it doesn't match our experience over 12 years of designing web applications so I'm having trouble understanding what's different, can I ask for any more advice you might have?
    If we calibrate the monitor using the recommended tools, will Photoshop images look 2-3 f-stops brighter (i.e. as they should look) and will images in all other apps (which look fine now, have always looked fine) look 2-3 f-stops too bright? Or would we be changing JUST the way Photoshop sees the images?
    Through probably a dozen different previous CRT and LCD monitors, we've never calibrated anything. Even on our immediately-previous Samsung 213T monitor, images appear pretty much the same in Photoshop as they do in all other places. That includes published web sites viewed with several popular browsers and viewed on literally hundreds of different systems inside and outside of our office.
    The previous monitor was being used with exactly the same software and hardware as the new one. The only thing that's changed is the monitor.
    Peter asks about brightness or white point luminance. I haven't used any tool to determine that. The monitor is set to 50% brightness, for whatever that's worth, but I can tell you that it is substantially BRIGHTER on white than the previous monitor. The previous Samsung monitor is being run side-by-side with the new one, and it looks quite dull and yellow beside the new one (and we thought it was a great monitor!) The new 30" Samsung has MUCH whiter whites. Does that help even a little?
    Thanks for any further advice.

  • Gray scale images – too dark

    CS5.5 or CC – I have experienced several times that flat grayscale imaged - corrected and nice in PhotoShop turns up much too dark when placed in InDesign.
    I make sure no effect or colors are applied to the frame or picture, but still no effect.
    If I force transparency on the actual spread (by placing two white items on top of each other, the topmost multiplied on the master page) then it looks correct at once.
    It makes no difference if it is a flat grayscale jpg or a psd, even a psd with a white background turns out this way.
    Why is that? - Do you know?
    BR Nina Storm

    ID previews grayscales two different ways, when there's transparency on the page or Overprint Sep Preview is turned on, grayscales preview via the CMYK profile. With no transparency (or an RGB Transparency Blend space) they preview as sGray (2.2 Gamma), which is useful for screen design.
    You can use your InDesign document's CMYK profile as the grayscale profile in Photoshop to get more consistent previews between ID and PS. Check this thread:
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/6123199#6123199

  • CS4 Printing Problems...too dark

    I am having a problem with prints coming out much too dark. I have CS4 on a Windows 7, 64 bit......I have the same problem with either my canon pixma pro 9500 or by epson stylus r2400............
    After an hour on the phone with epson I was able to get good prints using lightroom....so...
    It is not the printer, not my calibration...the problem is using cs4.
    I have gone though all the protocols.....using photoshop to manage color, etc etc..........
    Are there any thoughtsd out there? even my epson guy felt the issue must be in cs4 somewhere as I printed fine in lightroom.
    Thanks in advance

    I am having the same problem about 50% of the time.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Using an available upgrade from another family member on my plan???

    Hello all, I want to upgrade my 3G to the 3GS. I have an AT&T Family Plan. My wife's V1 iPhone account is upgrade available now. I want to give her my 3G and use her upgrade on my new 3GS...... I was hoping to just upgrade her phone, then later swap

  • Error when creating a folder ,iviews in the portal

    Dear sap gurus , I m facing a error when  creating a   Folder or an iview in my portal i'm using EP 7.0 sp11 ,The error is : Portal Runtime Error An exception occurred while processing a request for : <b>iView : pcd:portal_content/com.sap.pct/admin.t

  • SCVMM 2008 R2 - "The SQL Server service account does not have permission to access Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS)."

    I know this question has been asked before, but never for R2, that I can tell, and the posted fixes aren't working. I have just installed SCVMM 2008 R2 on a Windows Server 2008 R2 server, using a remote SQL 2008 SP1 database. When I attempt to connec

  • Warning messages in Analyzer

    Hi,   When i refresh my Workbook, I get few information or warning messages, but still I can execute for the results.But when I run the same query, these information or warning messages are treated as Error messages and I dont see any data. Why is th

  • Applying 500 Patch  to 11.1.2.2.300

    Hi, I am applying 500 Patch 18659116 patch to server (HFM,ERPI,ODI and FDM) .It is almost 2 hours 30 minutes it is still running I am getting Conflict handler and some times its copying file and many activites it is doing Is it really takes this much