ViewCriteria vs. attr showing up in Search Query

I have added a ViewCriteria with an attribute that is now set as queriable.
HOWEVER
I want this field disabled for the Search Component -- This is an ID field -- the ID field should NOT show up
in the Search --
Is there a way to accomplish both -- allow this id field to be used in the ViewCritieria AND
not have this field show up in the Search Named Criteria Queriable attrs?
How do I hide this in the Search --
I was setting all attrs that I did not want to show up in the search as not queriable --
My scenerio is as follows
When I display my page I want to execute the default VO query to show a table of results and a search.
All the params I DONT want visible in the search I set as queriable = "false".
Then I needed to create a view criteria special case where I can use the query but filter it based on an id.
WHERE FacetId Equal to Bind Variable (param facetId)
When I tried to execute the view criteria, it gave an error saying id was not queriable.
The code I used to execute is as follows:
FacetVOImpl facetVO = (FacetVOImpl) getFacet1();
String q = facetVO.getQuery();
String language = getDBTransaction().getSession().getLocale().getLanguage();
String country = getDBTransaction().getSession().getLocale().getCountry();
ViewCriteria criteria = facetVO.getViewCriteria("FacetVOCriteriaFacetId");
VariableValueManager vm = criteria.ensureVariableManager();
vm.setVariableValue("facetId", id);
facetVO.setApplyViewCriteriaName("FacetVOCriteriaFacetId");
facetVO.defineNamedWhereClauseParam("plang", language, null);
facetVO.defineNamedWhereClauseParam("pcountry",country, null);
facetVO.executeQuery(); // only 1 row returned
This required me to set the attr facetId as queriable in order to use it in this executeQuery().
Now the issue is that is shows up in my search on my search/table (AllQueriableAttributes) details page. How
can I remove this from the search page? Is there another setting other than isQueriable to hide the attribute in the Search?
I could not find a way to do so in the default VO.
Any suggestions?

Just a follow up q re: your suggestion Amit.
Do I need to instantiate the view criteria if the viewcriteria 1 does not have any bind vars?
In other words when I drag this vc1 onto my page and create search/details. Will I also need to use backing code to set the criteria or will this execute by
default? I though when setting vc, you are required to call executeQuery and set the vc explicitly. This would then require a methodAction prior to do the executeQuer before rendering the table.
Just want to clarify before changing all this to try this suggestion out. I thought about this, but was hoping there was a simple toggle just to hide the field.
What I have right now is working -- I just want to remove one field that is displayed in the search -- seems like it should be easier -- like setting not visible = true somewhere ??? Guess not -- sigh ...

Similar Messages

  • Results web part showing results before search query is typed in search box

    2 part question
    I am creating a wiki site in which the home page has a search box web part, and a results web part.  I have the search box configured to return the results to the results web part.  I created a result source and changed the query on the results
    web part to use this results source.  I am getting results from the library I am trying to, but...
    1) The results web part is showing results when the page is loaded before any query is typed into the search bar.  Why is this and can it be configured to just be blank until a query is entered into the search bar?
    2) Is it possible to have 1 search box and 1 results part have 2 different scope choices?  ie, 1 scope for the wiki library and 1 for a document library?
    Thank you.

    So I have to have 2 different search result web parts to have 2 different scopes if I wish to have the search and results occur on the same page? Would I also have to have 2 search boxes?
    Also, I am trying to figure out this issue where results are being returned without anything being entered in the search box.  I have {searchterms?} in my query, and documentation suggests this to be the way to handle this issue, but I continue to get
    results shown in the results web part without even entering a search query.  Please assist.

  • How To Make Search Query Showing the Result As List of Buttons.

    Can some one give me an idea how to start to make a Search Query showing the results as list of buttons.. i have already have my buttons with names. i just dont know how to make a search query.
    this is my on screen keyboard i made..
    im making a system that the result were a list of buttons.. showing like this
    This was supposed to be the output of the query that i need to do..
    Please help me.. i just need a idea or tips how to make this one.

    Here is code I posted recently for another question
    Public Class Form1
    Const BUTTON_SIZE As Integer = 20
    Const SPACE As Integer = 5
    Sub New()
    ' This call is required by the Windows Form Designer.
    InitializeComponent()
    ' Add any initialization after the InitializeComponent() call.
    Dim buttons As New List(Of List(Of MyRadioButton))
    For row = 1 To 6
    Dim newRow As New List(Of MyRadioButton)
    buttons.Add(newRow)
    For col = 1 To 6
    Dim button As New MyRadioButton()
    button.row = row
    button.col = col
    button.Height = BUTTON_SIZE
    button.Width = BUTTON_SIZE
    button.Left = col * (BUTTON_SIZE + SPACE)
    button.Top = row * (BUTTON_SIZE + SPACE)
    button.Name = String.Format("radGr1{0}_{1}", row.ToString(), col.ToString())
    Me.Controls.Add(button)
    newRow.Add(button)
    AddHandler button.CheckedChanged, AddressOf Radio_Change
    Next col
    Next row
    End Sub
    Private Sub Radio_Change(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs)
    Dim button As MyRadioButton = CType(sender, MyRadioButton)
    Dim row As Integer = button.row
    Dim col As Integer = button.col
    End Sub
    End Class
    Public Class MyRadioButton
    Inherits RadioButton
    Public row As Integer
    Public col As Integer
    End Class
    jdweng

  • "Your server is not configured properly or your search query has ..."

    Config info:
    v490, 20k+users, JES 2005Q1,
    118540-23
    118207-42
    115614-20
    Brief Description:
    When users select the Corporate Directory under the Address Book tab in CE and click the ALL button (or do a wildcard search) they get the following error:
    "Your server is not configured properly or your search query has
    exceeded the limit. Please check server configuration."
    Additional info:
    Additionally this error shows up when a user chooses a View: letter and clicks next for the following page, and additionally if they have the Corporate Directory set as their default address book in options.
    Logs:
    /sun1/dirserv/slapd-mail/logs/errors:
    [11/Oct/2005:10:44:21 -0500] - WARNING<20805> - Backend Database - conn=161557 op=34 msgId=169 - search is not indexed
    /sun1/dirserv/slapd-mail/logs/access:
    [11/Oct/2005:10:23:21 -0500] conn=161557 op=17 msgId=124 - SRCH base="o=ualr.edu,dc=mail,dc=ualr,dc=edu" scope=2
    filter="(&(&(cn=*)(|(objectClass=INETORGPERSON)(objectClass=GROUPOFUNIQUENAMES)))(objectClass=*))"
    attrs="objectClass"
    [11/Oct/2005:10:23:31 -0500] conn=161557 op=17 msgId=124 - RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=20540 etime=10 notes=U
    /var/sun1/comexp/logs/uwc.log:
    Oct 11, 2005 10:52:20 AM com.sun.uwc.abclient.ABInitFilter doFilter WARNING: Address Book session already set!!
    changes in /var/sun1/comexp/WEB-INF/config/corp-dir/db_config.properties
    lookthru_limit=30000
    I have a ticket, just wondering if anyone else has this problem...

    You'll be getting this in your case update (answer in response to the internal conversation we've been having about your issue)
    So if they really want to control wildcard searches then they should look in the "personalstore.properties" file for the domain (default: /var/opt/SUNWuwc/WEB-INF/domain/personalstore.properties) for the value of "db.idir.wildcardsearch". Its possible settings are documented in the comments. If they wish to disable all "*" and "*x*" searches (i.e. turn off the 'All' and selecting a letter options) they should set the value to at least 2.

  • Transformation in combination with a search query

    Using DPS 6.3 I have merged an Active Directory and Domino Directory. This all seems to work fine. The only issue I still have is that for some reason the transformations are not applied when performing a search query. An example: In AD groups can be found by performing a search for the objectclass "group". In Domino the objectclass is called "dominoGroup". To make the objectclasses match I made a transformation that removes "domino" from the Domino objectclass. I expected that searching for the objectclass "group" would now result in both groups from AD and Domino. But this is not the case.
    Is there a solution for this?

    Sorry for the late response, but I have not been able to work on this issue for the last few weeks. But I appreciate when you can have a look. It's the first time I have ever worked with DPS. The space was insufficient to post the complete conf.ldif file. I have now taken out my configuration. When you need something else just let me know.
    dn: cn=DSP_DOMINO,cn=datasource pools
    cn: DSP_DOMINO
    dn: cn=DS_DOMINO,cn=DSP_DOMINO,cn=datasource pools
    ldapServer: cn=DS_DOMINO,cn=data sources
    cn: DS_DOMINO
    dn: cn=DSP_AD,cn=datasource pools
    cn: DSP_AD
    dn: cn=DS_AD,cn=DSP_AD,cn=datasource pools
    ldapServer: cn=DS_AD,cn=data sources
    cn: DS_AD
    dn: cn=DS_AD,cn=data sources
    clientCredentialsForwarding: noForwarding
    cn: DS_AD
    useTCPNoDelay: true
    enabled: true
    useV1ProxiedAuthControl: false
    readOnly: true
    dn: cn=DS_DOMINO,cn=data sources
    clientCredentialsForwarding: noForwarding
    cn: DS_DOMINO
    useTCPNoDelay: true
    enabled: true
    useV1ProxiedAuthControl: false
    readOnly: false
    dn: cn=root data view, cn=Data Views
    cn: root data view
    viewBase: ""
    dataSourcePool: defaultDataSourcePool
    viewExclusionBase: cn=proxy manager
    viewExclusionBase: dc=interaccess,dc=nl
    viewExclusionBase: ""
    enabled: true
    dn: cn=DV_INTERACCESS,cn=data views
    readOnly: true
    dataSourcePool: DSP_AD
    viewBase: dc=interaccess,dc=nl
    description: Inter Access - AD
    cn: DV_INTERACCESS
    viewExclusionBase: ou=domino,ou=inter access,dc=interaccess,dc=nl
    viewAlternateSearchBase: ""
    viewAlternateSearchBase: dc=nl
    dn: cn=DV_DOMINO,cn=data views
    readOnly: false
    dataSourcePool: DSP_DOMINO
    viewBase: ou=domino,ou=inter access,dc=interaccess,dc=nl
    cn: DV_DOMINO
    attributeMapping: streetaddress#officestreetaddress
    attributeMapping: assistant#secretary
    attributeMapping: company#companyname
    DNSyntaxAttribute: distinguishedname
    DNSyntaxAttribute: dominoaccessgroups
    DNSyntaxAttribute: creatorsname
    DNSyntaxAttribute: member
    DNSyntaxAttribute: modifiersname
    DNSyntaxAttribute: secretary
    dataSourceBase: o=hpwibm
    attributeRule: DV_DOMINO_mapping_add-attr_otherMobile
    attributeRule: DV_DOMINO_mapping_add-attr_distinguishedName
    attributeRule: DV_DOMINO_read_add-attr_displayName
    attributeRule: DV_DOMINO_read_attr-value-mapping_displayname
    attributeRule: DV_DOMINO_read_remove-attr-value_objectclass
    attributeRule: DV_DOMINO_mapping_attr-value-mapping_objectclass
    attributeRule: DV_DOMINO_read_attr-value-mapping_objectclass
    attributeRule: DV_DOMINO_mapping_remove-attr-value_objectclass
    viewAlternateSearchBase: dc=interaccess,dc=nl
    viewAlternateSearchBase: ou=inter access,dc=interaccess,dc=nl
    viewAlternateSearchBase: ""
    viewAlternateSearchBase: dc=nl
    dn: cn=DV_DOMINO_mapping_add-attr_otherMobile,cn=attribute rules
    model: mapping
    viewAttributeValue: ${mobile}
    attributeName: otherMobile
    transformation: add
    cn: DV_DOMINO_mapping_add-attr_otherMobile
    dn: cn=DV_DOMINO_mapping_add-attr_distinguishedName,cn=attribute rules
    model: mapping
    viewAttributeValue: ${dn}
    attributeName: distinguishedName
    transformation: add
    cn: DV_DOMINO_mapping_add-attr_distinguishedName
    dn: cn=DV_DOMINO_read_add-attr_displayName,cn=attribute rules
    model: virtual
    viewAttributeValue: \${cn}
    attributeName: displayName
    transformation: add
    cn: DV_DOMINO_read_add-attr_displayName
    dn: cn=DV_DOMINO_read_attr-value-mapping_displayname,cn=attribute rules
    model: virtual
    viewAttributeValue: ${cn}
    attributeName: displayname
    transformation: replace value
    internalAttributeValue: ${displayName}
    cn: DV_DOMINO_read_attr-value-mapping_displayname
    dn: cn=DV_DOMINO_read_remove-attr-value_objectclass,cn=attribute rules
    model: virtual
    attributeName: objectclass
    transformation: delete value
    internalAttributeValue: inetOrgPerson
    cn: DV_DOMINO_read_remove-attr-value_objectclass
    dn: cn=DV_DOMINO_mapping_attr-value-mapping_objectclass,cn=attribute rules
    model: mapping
    viewAttributeValue: user
    attributeName: objectclass
    transformation: replace value
    internalAttributeValue: dominoPerson
    cn: DV_DOMINO_mapping_attr-value-mapping_objectclass
    dn: cn=DV_DOMINO_read_attr-value-mapping_objectclass,cn=attribute rules
    model: mapping
    viewAttributeValue: group
    attributeName: objectclass
    transformation: replace value
    internalAttributeValue: dominoGroup
    cn: DV_DOMINO_read_attr-value-mapping_objectclass
    dn: cn=DV_DOMINO_mapping_remove-attr-value_objectclass,cn=attribute rules
    model: virtual
    attributeName: objectclass
    transformation: delete value
    internalAttributeValue: groupofnames
    cn: DV_DOMINO_mapping_remove-attr-value_objectclass
    dn: cn=CHND_INTERACCESS,cn=connection handlers
    dataViewPolicy: DATA_VIEW_LIST
    useDataViewAffinity: false
    enabled: true
    cn: CHND_INTERACCESS
    sslCriteria: false
    dataViewList: DV_INTERACCESS
    dataViewList: DV_DOMINO
    dn: cn=PL_REFERRALS,cn=policies
    searchMaxSizeLimit: -1
    searchFilterMinSubstring: -1
    cn: PL_REFERRALS
    referralPolicy: forward

  • Search query not able to find node under a specific site structure (eg. 2013/05)?

    Hi,
        We are saving our data on a node under year/month site structure, eg. (2013/05/node1) but when we search for the data using a query in a custom workflow., it does not fetch any results.The query being fired is something like :
       SELECT * FROM [nt:base] AS s WHERE ISDESCENDANTNODE([/content/hm/NewsroomSection/en/NewsRoom/NewsroomDetails/2013/05/node1]) .
       On trying to run this query directly in crxde, it shows no result. But when we change the site structure to 2013/5/node1, it is able to fetch results.
       I am not sure if the problem is because of the '0' digit in the month in site structure (2013/05).
       Please provide your input if any of you have come across something like this before ..
    Thanks
    Abhishek

    Hi Abhishek,
    In case of nodes with numbers, any node starting with 0, this 0 gets omitted in the search query.
    So, if your node name is like 02013 for year, when it searches it omits 0 and searches for 2013.
    In case you want to search for your node, your SQL2 query should be like below:
    SELECT * FROM [nt:base] AS s WHERE ISDESCENDANTNODE(['/content/mysite/en/products/2013/05'])
    See screenshot for reference. This should return you the results.
    Hope this helps.
    I guess for more reference on SQL2 queries, you can refer to JCR 2.0 spec.
    http://www.day.com/specs/jcr/2.0/6_Query.html
    Also, you might want to look at the railroad diagrams and some examples from Jackrabbit's test cases:
    http://www.h2database.com/jcr/grammar.html
    http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jackrabbit/trunk/jackrabbit-spi-commons/src/test/resources/or g/apache/jackrabbit/spi/commons/query/sql2/test.sql2.txt?view=markup
    Hope this helps.

  • Search Query Web Part thumbnail image link broken

    Hello,
    I have 4 farms spread across the world and I want to pull news from Farm 1 (headquarters) into farm 2, 3, and 4. In SharePoint 2007 I did this with content deployment by pushing only the news site out to the other 3 farms.  However, from
    reading content deployment guidelines in SP13 I feel this is no longer a supported configuration.
    I am trying to use the search query web part to accomplish this now.  I have a search query web part that I am using to roll up articles from SharePoint at farm 1.  So far it is mostly working, the articles are pulled in and I can see
    them.  When I click the link it takes me from the current farm (farm 2) to farm 1 to read the article.  The only problem I am having is that the rollup image does not display at farm 2, 3, or 4.  I believe this is happening because the image
    URL at the source is getting saved as a relative URL.  Even if I try to override the relative URL to the image with an absolute URL then it just forces the URL back to a relative URL because clearly SharePoint is smarter than I am and there is no reason
    I should ever want an absolute URL.
    I should add that to get this working, in my search settings, I had to configure an extra content source (to farm 1).
    So my question is what is the best way to handle this?  Is there an option in my search configurations on farm 2 to override URL's for a particular content source?  Am I even headed down the right path trying to do this with the content search
    web part?
    Thanks,

    Hi Tom,
    I have been trying to figure out what you mean when you say I am using 'Page item' instead of 'Picture'.  I don't understand what you mean.
    When I set up a page that will be published I have actually been using an 'Article Page' content type for the news item I want to share on all of the farms.  After creating the page there is a section at the bottom for a 'Rollup Image'  I specify
    the URL in this rollup image but the actual image is stored in an 'Assets' Library.  I have no problem with the article page itself showing up on Farm 2, just not the image.  The "Rollup Image" data type is Publishing Image - "Rollup
    Image is a site column created by the Publishing feature. It is used on the Page Content Type as the image for the page shown in content roll-ups such as the Content By Search web part." 
    Question 1: Are you saying that I need to somehow replace that rollup image field with a custom site column field?
    Question 2: If I set up a new column then do I need to worry about connecting catalogs?
    In your post from December 9th it sounded like you had this working in your test environment. 
    Question 3: Did you have it working using a different configuration there? 
    Question 4: If so, did it require having a separate web application just for Assets, or were you using a custom site column there?
    In Farm 2, after I connected my catalog from Farm 1, I found that a Pages library at the top level of my site collection contained some strange entries. I have files in that library called
    CatalogItem--1684387697
    CatalogItem-364050575
    Category-
    Category-1211-4576
    The first CatalogItem gives me an error "Sorry, something went wrong".  The rest seem to contain images from Farm 1.  However, news articles still are not finding those images.  I suppose that is because the 'Rollup image' link is
    still pointing to a different path than that connected catalog.  Anyway, those items were checked out to me and were not published.  I checked them in and published those Category/CatalogItem connections hoping that would work, but
    that didn't help either.  
    When I set up my catalog in farm 1 I only checked 'Enable this library as a catalog'.  None of the other fields seemed to apply since I am not publishing to a public site (Anonymous access) and also since I am not trying to tie identifiers to catalog
    items (Catalog Item URL fields).  Additionally when I connected to my catalog I tried "<label for="ctl00_PlaceHolderMain_connectionTypeSection_fullConnection">Integrate the catalog into my site" with the setting "</label><label
    for="ctl00_PlaceHolderMain_rewriteDecisionSection_noURLRewriteRadioButton">Make URLs point to source catalog".  I also tried "</label><label for="ctl00_PlaceHolderMain_connectionTypeSection_manualConnection">Connect,
    but do not integrate the catalog".  Both of those settings sounded like they might force catalog items to look to the source (Farm 1).  Neither worked.  There are a lot of other settings but none of them seem to apply to my situation. 
    I'm not trying to configure Navigation Hierarchy, Category Pages, or Item Pages.  Maybe I need to do something with "Catalog Item URL Format", but I'm not sure what settings I should try.</label>
    Questions 5,6: Do you have recommendations for my catalog/catalog connections to get this working?  Obviously my current configuration is not right or else it would work, but am I even close?

  • Item title won't show in Content Search Web Part

    Hi,
    I am trying to show news items from one site on another site. I can show all attributes so far, except for the title.
    The field name of the title in the news item is 'title'.
    In crawled properties, I have linked the title to Title, RefinableString00 and RefinableString12.
    But the title either displays DispForm.aspx as a title (when I select title), or nothing (when I select the mapped property RefinableString00 or RefinableString12).
    What can/should I do to show the title field?

    Hi,
    According to your post, my understanding is that Item title did not show in Content Search Web Part.
    You need to open the webpart either in SP designer or visual studio or as matter of fact in Notepad and search for the special property. And then add your list columns which you wants to display.
    More information:
    How to: Display Custom Fields in a SharePoint Content By Query Web Part (ECM)
    SharePoint: Content Query Webpart - OOB, Custom Fields, Custom Style with Table format
    Best Regards,
    Linda Li
    Linda Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • ATG Search | Query Rules are not executing

    Hi,
    We want to put some search relaxation, for example partial entry of a search term returns results i.e.if user enter "shi" results should show all shirts.
    Followed following steps for that,
    1) Created query rules for wildcard pattern with a actions.(For example created a pattern "shi*" and action "prop,string,displayName,Shirt" , so that when a user enter "shi", search results would return all products whose name contain "Shirt" or "Shirts".
    2) After indexing, verified Query Rules are applied; using "Index Review" (QueryRuleLoad -- 4 rules, 4 patterns, 4 actions, from stream)
    3) Layered the component /atg/commerce/search/catalog/QueryRequest property ruleMode to exec so that search request contain "ruleMode=exec" as per ATG docs.
    4) Clear and Disable cache using the component : /atg/search/routing/CacheService/
    5) Search submitted on site for "shi".
    6) Verified Search request XML that "ruleMode=exec" is being send to Search Engine.
    But as per query rules, search results/response are not coming, verified response XML, but didn't find any clue.
    Are we missing any configuration for query rules to execute or the pattern & action which we have created are not proper ?
    Thanks,
    Sarbajeet

    Hi  ,
    According to your description, my understanding is that you want to configure Query Rule for the SharePoint Contextual Search (by default its result page is osssearchresult.aspx).
    As far as I know, the Query Rules
     work in the SharePoint Contextual Search when you define them on site level. You can create your query rule in
     your Site ->  Site Settings -> Search -> Query Rules.
    Meanwhile the SharePoint Contextual Search is based on the result sources defined in the Site Settings->Search -> Result Sources, you need to make
     the result source of your Query Rule to the above Result Source.
    Reference:
    http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/64393/where-to-define-query-rule-and-when
    Best Regards,
    Eric
    Eric Tao
    TechNet Community Support

  • How to get tasks assigned to me or group in which I belong to using Search Query?

    Hello,
    I want to get the tasks assigned to me or tasks assign to me in which I belong to. I know how to get it using CAML query however I want to get it in my custom search display template using Content Search Web Part.
    <Or>
    <Membership Type="CurrentUserGroups">
    <FieldRef Name="AssignedTo"/>
    </Membership>
    <Eq>
    <FieldRef Name="AssignedTo"/>
    <Value Type="Integer">
    <UserID/>
    </Value>
    </Eq>
    </Or>
    Please let me know how to filter tasks assign to group in which I belong to.
    Here is query which shows tasks assign to me but not to tasks assign to my groups
    (ContentType:Task OR ContentType:RequestTaskContentType OR ContentType:DelegacyAccountingContentType) AND
    AssignedTo:{User.Name} AND
    -Status:Completed AND -Status:Closed AND Status:"Not Applicable"
    Thanks & Regards,
    Jay
    Jayesh Prajapati

    Hi Jay,
    No, you can filter tasks assign to group in which you belong to using Content Search Web Part. Because there is no Query variable for current user group in SharePoint 2013 Search Query. You can have a look at the article:
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-in/library/jj683123.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
    For a workaround, you can use the My Tasks web part outside of MySites:
    http://bernado-nguyen-hoan.com/2013/03/03/making-my-tasks-web-part-available-outside-of-mysites/
    http://yalla.itgroove.net/2014/04/27/use-sharepoint-tasks-web-part-outside-sites/
    Best Regrads,
    Eric
    TechNet Community Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
    [email protected]

  • Set a field label by conditions, in a Search Query

    Dear all ADF buddies,
    Can I set a field label by conditions? Say: if UserRole=A then Label = A; else Label = B;
    The problem is those field labels are not attribute of JSP, they are inside a Search Query. Thus the label text are defined in the table EO, which I cant find any place in JDeveloper to set custom expression.
    Any one know how?
    =)
    James Fan

    Hi Frank, thank you for replying.
    Tried to amend the ViewRowImpl.java and added those related functions. It didn't get called while rendering the Search Query fields, but only after.
    Any way to do this on the EO side? I think it s more likely that the Search Query dialog is reading label value directly from the EO
    I found there are AttributeDefImpl or AttributeHints in the EntityImpl.java. Are there examples to show how to override these classes?
    James
    Edited by: 1003858 on 2013年5月6日 上午2:34

  • Apple Support Page - Search Query Not Working

    Dear helpers,
    There's something mysterious happening on the Apple Support page. When I enter a search query, weird (and not so wonderful) characters appear in my search string, ruining my search, resulting in 0 results every time.
    For instance, imagine I enter "bug report" in the search, press enter/return. The results page shows the (few or no) results, but in the search is the string:
    "bug report kmosx5"
    Where is the extraneous 'kmosx5' coming from. OSX5 would suggest it's related to OSX 5 (Leopard). Is this a 'behind-the-scenes' filter for the search string to restrict this to OS X10.5...? Either way, it shouldn't be concatenated onto my search string, surely!
    Any ideas?
    Pete.

    Hi Pete!
    From This Support Page, if I enter bug report, in the Search Support field, and press my enter key, this is the generated Results Page.
    As joshz posted, you may prefer to use the Advanced Search Page.
    ali b

  • Change operation for refine constraint in search query

    Here is my search query XML:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <query ... some values omitted ...
    <documentSets>
    <and>
    ... some values omitted ...
    <prop name="childSKUs.price" op="greater" type="float">0</prop>
    ... some values omitted ...
    </and>
    </documentSets>
    <refineConstraint>
    <and>
    <prop name="childSKUs.price" repositoryId="106" op="greatereq-less" case="false" type="float">0-346</prop>
    </and>
    </refineConstraint>
    ... some values omitted ...
    </query>
    I have a price constraint configured as:
    $class=atg.search.routing.command.search.PropConstraint
    $scope=request
    type=float
    propertyName=childSKUs.price
    operation=greater
    value=0
    I am noticing some response values are being dropped from the list because op="greatereq-less" should be op="*greater-lesseq*"
    How can I configure the refine constraint properties to use a different operator?
    I can see how to configure the document set properties (as per op="greater" above) here: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23095_01/Search.93/ATGSearchQueryRef/html/s0402propertyconstraints01.html but I can't find any references as to where to configure refine constraints.
    In the example above any products with a price of $346 get dropped from the response.
    Anyone have any thoughts on this?

    It's possible in the Refine Edge dialog you have Show Original checked.
    If so, uncheck Show Original and see if the makes a difference.

  • HT203167 A movie I purchased in the iTunes store is missing. It isn't hidden and doesn't show up in search. I've followed support steps.  Where is it and how do I find it?  I believe I originally purchased the film on my 1st Gen AppleTV.

    A movie I purchased in the iTunes store is missing. It isn't hidden and doesn't show up in search. I've followed support steps.  Where is it and how do I find it?  I believe I originally purchased the film on my 1st Gen AppleTV...other movies show up. Help.

    It was Love Actually. It's been in my library a few years but is now missing. It's odd...it isn't even in the iTunes Store anymore. I think there is a rights issue because a message appeared in the store saying it wasn't available at this time in the U. S. store. Still, if I bought it years ago it should be in my library or I should get a refund....

  • I download songs from a CD but they do not show up in Search or list

    In iTunes 11 (yes, the new iTunes *****), I download the songs from a CD and they do not show up in Search, under Songs, under Artist, etc. The songs show up the next day, however. All I can think of is that Apple is uploading my songs and won't show them in iTunes until they have done so. I would hope not, but I have checked all my settings and cannot find anything else that might be going on.

    Well, I think I found the answer to my own question. Usually when I do a search, the songs show up in a list as I type. However, with a new song, I have to actually hit the return key to have it show up. Later, like the next day, it will show up automatically as I type, but songs new to iTunes don't.

Maybe you are looking for