Virtual Memory question

Not sure which part of the forum to post this, so i'm just posting it here. When i'm sitting in windows just browsing the internet etc, my virtual memory is at around 400/3940mb. When i start up a game, it spikes up to around 1000mb of 3940. Is this normal?

Skylinee,
I am from another school, if your comp keeps paging to your HD, I add more RAM.
I set my page file to min and max both at 384mb and I disable the paging executive in the Windows Registry.
Take Care,
Richard 

Similar Messages

  • Virtual/Real Memory question

    My Mac pro is configured with quad 2.6ghz processors, the stock 250gb Seagate HD and another 500gb Seagate (7200.11); ATI x1900 graphics card.... And 6gb of Ram...
    Now I would think this configuration would make the Mac a lot faster than it has, more particularly in CS3. I have a few questions about this.
    *Is my ram config'd optimally -*
    DIMM 1/DIMM Riser A:
    Size: 512 MB
    Type: RAM
    Speed: 667 MHz
    Status: OK
    DIMM 1/DIMM Riser B:
    Size: 512 MB
    Type: RAM
    Speed: 667 MHz
    Status: OK
    DIMM 2/DIMM Riser A:
    Size: 512 MB
    Type: RAM
    Speed: 667 MHz
    Status: OK
    DIMM 2/DIMM Riser B:
    Size: 512 MB
    Type: RAM
    Speed: 667 MHz
    Status: OK
    DIMM 3/DIMM Riser A:
    Size: 1 GB
    Type: RAM
    Speed: 667 MHz
    Status: OK
    DIMM 3/DIMM Riser B:
    Size: 1 GB
    Type: RAM
    Speed: 667 MHz
    Status: OK
    DIMM 4/DIMM Riser A:
    Size: 1 GB
    Type: RAM
    Speed: 667 MHz
    Status: OK
    DIMM 4/DIMM Riser B:
    Size: 1 GB
    Type: RAM
    Speed: 667 MHz
    Status: OK
    *Why does my computer rely mostly on virtual memory when it says that half of my real memory is free?* For example, with Adobe Premiere it says its using about 500mb of real and about 1.6gb of virtual; shouldn't it be the other way around since it also reports 2gb of free of "real memory?"
    *After installing the 2nd hard drive (Scratch drive), I didn't notice a drastic difference in performance (CS3).* I went into preferences for each program and set all the scratch disks to the new HD. I store all my media on there also.
    So.. Disk 1= Startup, and runs all my programs. Disk 2= Set as scratch disks and stores all media (even while I'm working on it).
    - Have I done or not done something correctly? I.E. - If I have a photo that I'm going to work on in Photoshop should I store the actual photo on the scratch drive or the startup drive? Are there any other locations where I need to change preferences to designate scratch disks?
    *-One more question-* With my configuration does a render time of 20-30 minutes seem plausible for a 15 minute clip, or should rendering be more in the realm of 2-4 minutes.

    You realize that the memory pairs are on the same Riser.
    Slots 1 and 2; 3 and 4. Not across Risers.
    Best place for 1GB DIMMs is Dimm slots 1 and 2 on both Risers.
    Depends some on the size of your files you work on.
    CS3: enable VM buffering plug-in is helpful if files are 1GB or larger.
    You might even have been better off with 4 x 2GB and just that.
    Disk drives. The OEM 250 is slow and use for system backup, but pull it and replace with 10K Raptor.
    Use 750GB WD Caviar SE16 for data.
    Use a couple 10K Raptors for scratch in RAID, or use RE2 in RAID.
    Keep the boot drive for just the OS and apps, and keep your files elsewhere.
    MacGurus has a tutorial pdf on optimizing Photoshop that is excellent, plus a testing benchmark utility that can help benchmark and time your work flow.
    I would never choose Seagate though maybe they've improved the .11. The ES line has not and is still slow.
    VM: that is what is allocated for addressing. What matters - and this has been asked and answered a couple times - are pageouts, swap files and their size.
    You need more and better disk drives in my opinion for starters.
    Putting your data on scratch is okay, but store your data elsewhere otherwise.
    10K Raptor boot drive
    2 drive RAID for scratch
    data drive
    ... it might be that you are best served with external drives and 3rd party controller to allow for larger faster scratch RAID.

  • The old allowing oracle 3GB virtual memory on windows 2003 server question?

    Hi all,
    I have a 9.2.0.7.0 database on windows 2003 server (32bit). 4 dual core cpu's and 16GB of Ram.
    I have set .use_indirect_data_buffers=TRUE and *._enable_NUMA_optimization=FALSE.
    The db_block_buffers is set at 4GB.
    Shared_pool 200MB
    Large_pool 56MB
    Java pool 56MB
    PGA is currently at 400MB
    AWE_WINDOW_MEMORY is set at 720MB (which is the lowest I can set it)
    At the moment there are various jobs running on the database and no users logged on and the virtual memory is at 1.8GB.
    The problem is as soon as the users logs onto the DB the virtual memory goes over 2GB and we see the error 'ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 2416 bytes'.
    Now I have edited the boot.ini with the following parameters:
    multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINNT="UBS WSP - Wintel Server Platform with PAE" /fastdetect /PAE /4GT
    because the /3GB parameter switch started the server with lots of errors.
    The oracle.exe process still seems unable to go over the 2GB limit with getting 'ORA-04030' errors.
    Can someone tell me if I have missed anything? Or a reason why oracle is not using the switch?
    TIA
    Eddy

    Satish,
    see metalink Note:1036312.6 : Utilizing Up to 3GB Virtual Memory on Windows.
    it says :
    "The 32-bit versions of the Windows® 2000 Advanced Server and Windows NT Server 4.0, Enterprise Edition, operating systems were the first versions of Windows to provide applications with a 3-GB flat virtual address space, with the kernel and executive components using only 1 GB. In response to customer requests, Microsoft has expanded the availability of this support to the 32-bit version of Windows XP Professional and all 32-bit versions of Windows Server™ 2003."
    of course, we mustn't be mistaken with the AWE switch (/PAE) that is not available for standard edition.
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/291988 ==> tells more about what can be supported
    regards,
    marc

  • When playing games on facebook, I often get the message "virtual memory too low, is being increased" Is there something I can do to clean out the "virtual memory" to avoid this?

    As mentioned in my question above, it happens usually during playing games. I wondered if there were someway to clean out the virtual memory, as opposed to it "increasing" continually and overloading my memory in general. You are speaking with a computer novice for the most part, so I am unfamiliar with a lot. I do do updates and general maintenance on the computer, but is that enough for this issue?

    Your plugins list shows outdated plugin(s) with known security and stability risks.
    * Shockwave Flash 10.0 r45
    Update the [[Flash]] plugin to the latest version.
    *http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/
    Physical memory is the memory that is installed on your computer as real memory. To be able to run programs that require more memory and more programs at the same time (via time sharing and task switching) it is also possible to move (swap) currently not needed code and data to disk to make room for other programs and data. The total memory available for programs is the Virtual Memory.
    You can check the Virtual Memory settings here: Control Panel > System > Advanced > Performance > Settings (Advanced tab)<br />
    Windows can manage more memory then is physical available and that memory is stored in a page file on your hard drive.
    If the size of that file is not large enough and all available memory is in use then you get the Virtual Memory is low warning.
    Make sure that you have at least 1 GB or the recommended setting for the Virtual Memory.
    If you have less than 1 GB physical memory installed on your computer then if possible add more memory.
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555223 - RAM, Virtual Memory, Pagefile and all that stuff

  • JVM virtual memory footprint

    I'm running java processes (specifically Tomcat) on a linux system with not too much available memory and I run into a lots of problems as java seems to consume a lot more memory than it would need.
    To understand the problem I created this "unit test":
    [root@vps download]# ulimit -v unlimited
    [root@vps download]# java -version
    java version "1.5.0_14"
    Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_14-b03)
    Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_14-b03, mixed mode)
    [root@vps download]# ulimit -v 230000
    [root@vps download]# java -version
    java version "1.5.0_14"
    Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_14-b03)
    Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_14-b03, mixed mode)
    [root@vps download]# ulimit -v 220000
    [root@vps download]# java -version
    Error occurred during initialization of VM
    Could not reserve enough space for object heap
    Could not create the Java virtual machine.As you can see the java vm won't start up when the allowed virtual memory is under 230 Mb, which is an amount of memory I can't give java in a virtual server. I have tried limiting the memory consumption with any memory option I could find (starting with the famous -Xmx and -Xms ones) but always with the same results and problems.
    By running Tomcat and using "top" I noticed java requests over 250 Mb virtual memory, while actually using only around 35 Mb. I would be glad to allow this process to reserve up to 100Mb in virtual memory, but over that seems crazy, since I perfectly know my tomcat instance will never require that much memory and since I cannot "afford" all that memory usage from a single process. With that kind of consumption I can't even stop tomcat using the ordinary script (the shutdown.sh script will start another vm to send the stop signal to tomcat but since the first one is already consuming 250 Mb virtual memory and the second one tries to allocate as much I will get the heap error message as my server can't allocate that much total memory on top of the other processes).
    What solutions are there to stop java from reserving memory it won't use?

    ingoio256 wrote:
    First I quote yourself from another (someway similar) thread:
    "Under Linux, the OS allows over-allocation of memory (which means it can reserve memory that it doesn't have the physical RAM or swap file to back it up with)"
    If I was able to do that my problems would be solved: in fact my system doesn't have enough physical+swap memory, but since a lot less will be used by java processes if I was able to instruct the system to allocate it even if it's not available I would have my problems solved.
    Any idea about where I can find help on doing that?It may already be doing that; under Linux, I believe it only looks for memory to back up the allocation when the page is touched. Whether the java process touches all the memory it allocates, I don't know. Maybe it behaves differently when there's no page file.
    The second question is the following:
    I noticed java processes on the windows system don't use as much virtual memory as it happens in my vps: the reported virtual memory allocation is just slightly above the used physical one. Does that depend on a different implementation or does it happen after some time the jvm is running, with unused virtual memory being given back to the system? If the latter was right it would partly ease the problem as I would just need for the java process to be running for a while and then I would have some system resources released. If it's not the case... how can I have linux behave similarly to windows? As in this case it seems more efficient ;)Regarding the memory usage difference, I don't know why that is.
    I've seen people say that the Sun JVM doesn't return memory to the OS after it allocates, but I'm not sure of this. This is another aspect that a different JVM implementation could help with. I think IBM and BEA both have their own implementations you could check out.

  • How to reduce page faults (virtual memory) usage in LabVIEW

    I am running LabVIEW 2010 on Windows Embedded Standard system 4G (3G usable) of RAM.
    The program (executable running on the Run-Time Engine) continuously samples from a USB-6251 at 1MS/sec (2 channels @ 500K) and scans the data stream for anomalous events, which are recorded to file.  The system is intended to run 24/7 for at least 2 months, and although everything is working fine (6% CPU, no memory leaks), it generates 6000 Page Faults / second.  I am concerned that I will kill the hard-drive at this rate, over long periods of time.  There is plenty of RAM available (LabVIEW is only using 200K, and there is over 2G free), but the program is choosing to rely on Virtual Memory instead.
    Is there a way to force (coerce) a LabVIEW application to consume more RAM and less VM?
    The code is heavy (2 independent routines to collect and process the data stream through a shared double buffer, lots of in-obvious logic...), but I will post if it would help to answer the question.

    Craig Akers wrote:
    I am running LabVIEW 2010 on Windows Embedded Standard system 4G (3G usable) of RAM.
    The program (executable running on the Run-Time Engine) continuously samples from a USB-6251 at 1MS/sec (2 channels @ 500K) and scans the data stream for anomalous events, which are recorded to file.  The system is intended to run 24/7 for at least 2 months, and although everything is working fine (6% CPU, no memory leaks), it generates 6000 Page Faults / second.  I am concerned that I will kill the hard-drive at this rate, over long periods of time.  There is plenty of RAM available (LabVIEW is only using 200K, and there is over 2G free), but the program is choosing to rely on Virtual Memory instead.
    Is there a way to force (coerce) a LabVIEW application to consume more RAM and less VM?
    The code is heavy (2 independent routines to collect and process the data stream through a shared double buffer, lots of in-obvious logic...), but I will post if it would help to answer the question.
    IIRC, the decision to move a page of memory from physical memory to disk is made at the OS level.  There probably isn't any setting you can change in LabVIEW to change this behavior.
    Keep in mind that not every page fault results in a page being loaded from disk.  If your program (or the LabVIEW run-time) is frequently allocating and freeing memory, you could get a lot of soft page faults as the physical memory pages are repeatedly allocated to your process and returned to the OS.  If you're only running at 6% CPU, this wouldn't be a problem.
    You could try disabling the page file altogether, if the machine has enough RAM, but I wouldn't do this unless you actually have a performance (or hard-disk durability) problem.  Having a page file to back up the physical memory is the difference between your program suffering from degraded performance vs. simply crashing if the machine runs out of physical memory.
    Mark Moss
    Electrical Validation Engineer
    GHSP

  • CS5 save as CS4 makes Large File and sees virtual memory issue

    Two CS5 flash files. FileSource 27Mb  File Destination 21.8Mb
    They open in 80 seconds for each.
    FileSource has 15 MovieClips, 5 show areas of the map in a variety of colours, shape intensive one could say ! These are made into one movie clip and copy pasted to the FileDestination. In CS5 it then crashes.
    I turned these instead into CS4 files, they open in 10 seconds ! WOW !!!  I needed to adjust the text which had become two lines from one though.
    I try again for the CopyPaste of the movie Clip from library to library, this time I get a message Flash is out of  memory. To increase virtual memory, quit Flash and allocate more virtual memory in the Systems Properties dialog box.
    In there I see
    Initial   2046Mb
    Max size 4092Mb
    Recommended 4605Mb
    I alter this to:
    Initial  3800Mb
    Max    4600Mb
    Reboot PC (Win XP SP2 wih 4Gb ram, purpose built video editing suite) and try again, but again get the memory message. Such a powerful PC should handle Flash. PC at work also crashing with CS5.
    I thought I was winning with the quick handling of the files in CS4 but File size is now alarmingly FileSource  76.1Mb  and FileDestination 58.4Mb   WHY ? and why does it open them so quick but fall over on the copy paste ?
    CS4 opens these in 8 not 80 secs, but that save as CS4 has bloated their file size, quick to open but causing virtual memory failure. 
    I am defeated
    Does CS5 have some way of keeping size down ? I can’t use CS5 as it crashes when pasting the MovieClip from the source file to destination.
    Can I get Flash to simplify the layers perhaps ? There are many shapes of the same colour which perhaps could be fused into one, lessening the number of vector edges. How is that done ? I am making an swf file for a clients powerpoint slide show.
    Envirographics

    Possible good news. I've been away and hadn't opened DW since also having had a problem with Finder and external drives on my return. When I opened it today, and needed to do a 'Save As' , it did it with no problem of rendering. Though there have been no DW updates, there was updates to PS and ID. So I'll tentatively say the problem has gone away - hopefully for good.
    Just editing this post. I happened to turn  Live View on etc.. for the first time in a couple of weeks due to the  above. I realsied this morning I hadn't turned it on. Now it is just as  before when I try to 'Save As' - blank, an then have to close and reopen  for it to render (even though the Live View/Live Code is now stiched  off).
    No I don't know how to turn this thread back into an 'Unanswered' question.
    Message was edited by: tgiadd

  • I need to clean up so i can have some more virtual memory get rid of old things i do not need like music etc.

    ''Duplicate post, continue here - [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/782884]''
    helpe delete things from my virtual memory so i can have more

    Virtual memory has nothing to do with having files saved on your hard drive, unless you also get an error about disk space.
    You can check the Virtual Memory settings here: Control Panel > System > Advanced > Performance > Settings (Advanced tab)<br />
    Windows can manage more memory then is physical available and that memory is stored in a page file on your hard drive.<br />
    If the size of that file is not large enough and all available memory is in use then you get the Virtual Memory is low warning.<br />
    Make sure that you have at least 1 GB or the recommended setting for the Virtual Memory.<br />
    If you have less than 1 GB physical memory installed on your computer then if possible add more memory.<br />
    * http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555223 - RAM, Virtual Memory, Pagefile and all that stuff

  • SIMBL Agent--what is it and why is its virtual memory footprint 30gb+?

    Loud fan noises. Discovered something called SIMBL Agent was using well over 30 gigabytes of virtual memory. 2nd place was Safari at only 1.5!
    So, the question of the day is
    What is SIMBL Agent?
    What is it doing?
    And should I be concerned at 30gb+ of space being consumed?
    (OK, so thats 3 questions of the day! )

    Thanks for the reply! My understanding is that virtual memory uses hard drive space... so 30 GB+ is excessive, right? Or, has "virtual memory" taken on a new meaning in Leopard, or OS X.
    Virtual Memory information is mostly meaningless, except to software developers and very few of them.
    Virtual Memory is often times filled with holes of unused address space. The application code is mapped into this space, and the disk used for this is the actual executable code.
    All the shared libraries and application frameworks that the application uses are mapped into the virtual address space, often times with empty gaps in the address space. Again the disk used are the shared library and framework files.
    If the application has loadable modules, such as browser or photoshop add-ons, then these get mapped into virtual address space. And the disk for this comes from the add-on files. Also these add-ons are most likely mapped into the virtual address space with gaps between them and other code.
    Then comes the data used by the application. This comes in different flavors. Some might be memory mapped files, where an explicit file accessed as if it is part of memory (vs doing read/write operations). If the file is huge, then the virtual address space needed to map it will be large as well. Or an application can memory map a bunch of smaller files, but if you have enough of them then that adds up to a lot of virtual address space.
    NOTE: when memory mapping a file, the application has the opiton of specifying where in the virtual address space it would like the file to be mapped. So it is very possible for an application to specify they would like to map a file at the 29GB address offset, and everything from the lower address up to the now memory mapped file at 29GB is empty address space. No RAM and no disk associated with this gap.
    So far everything I've mentioned does not need swapfile space, as real files are used for all of the above.
    The application stack is mapped into the virtual address space. Since the stack grows as the application calls subroutines, it is necessary to leave lots of unmapped addresses for the stack to grow into. Since most stacks to not grow that big, a lot of that virtual address space is never mapped to RAM nor disk.
    And there is the actual data being worked on by the application. This could be local variables used as part of the program flow control, or it could be buffers used to hold data the program is working on. This data would get allocated potential space in swapfiles (/var/vm/swapfile*), however, if the operating system does not run out of RAM, then it will not need to actually create any additional space in the swapfiles.
    Now I have no idea what your 30GB application is doing with all of its virtual address space. And it is possible that it is using all of it, and forcing RAM to /var/vm/swapfile* files. If you really want to know, you can always use the vmmap command from a terminal (man vmmap).
    However, in my experience, no one really cares. All they really want to know is whether their Mac is spending a lot of time paging. And for that I like to use Applications -> Utilities -> Terminal
    sar -g 50 100
    The command will display pageout information once a minute for 100 minutes (adjust values to suite your tastes).
    Now you do your normal work. When you come back an look at the sar output, if it is mostly zero or some small values, or a momentary burst, then you really do not need to worry. If you have sustained high values, or if you notice a the Mac is slow at the same time you getting high pageout numbers, then you could benefit from more memory, or running fewer apps at the same time.

  • Low virtual memory

    i am running a vi which uses telnet, and has 5 picture indicators on the front panel with 2 or 3 Jpeg's in each of them. after running the vi for approx 30 mins, virtual memory runs out.

    A couple things to try:
    1. Can you post the vi in question?
    2. You can use the vi profiler to see which aspect is using the memory over time. Turn it on under Tools->Advanced->profile vis, check "Profile Memory Usage" and then run the program.
    3. Which OS are you using? What is your hard drive free space? What is your physical memory size. For NT based windows OSs (NT, XP, 2000, ME) the Task Manager will also give you memory statistics (ctlr-alt-del to bring it up). In 95/98 you can get the same info using the Start Menu->Accesories->System Tools->System Monitor.
    Hope it helps!
    ~js
    2006 Ultimate LabVIEW G-eek.

  • Equium can not play game due to low "Virtual memory"

    When I try to install a game which I had installed in other toshiba series, I got this massage " This program can not be installed because it requires at least 3 MB virtual memory" Please help me. What does it mean the virtual memory? my laptop has 2 Gm Ram and it should manage a game.
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    with that Virtual memory the size of the swapfile of windows is meant, where the files which do not fit into ram are swapped with it to HDD.
    Did you minimized the size of that file?
    And the most important question is: Which version of windows do you own?
    Greets

  • How many virtual memory do you have on 10.6.1

    Hi everybody,
    a few time ago, i was on 10.5.7 on a Macbook unibody 2Ghz 2Go RAM, so, there, my MV (virtual memory) Was about 7,45Go with lot of apps running in background...
    now, on Snow Leopard my VM is about 130Go without anything running?
    is it normal? my other Mac (last Macbook pro 13") has the same VM than my MacBook 2Ghz...
    so what is your VM? is it normal??? link with the 64bit?
    130 is also the same than my hardisk? 160Go
    so many questions tha make me esitate to downgrade on 10.5.8...
    tks answering

    My Mac Pro also reports about 130GB for VM size (in Activity Monitor).
    In spite of, or perhaps more clearly than what the Activity Monitor helps says - that is - "Virtual memory, or VM, is hard disk space that can be used as memory".
    It is the potential size that might be used on disk.
    I look at my actual swap file (located in /private/var/vm) and it is only 64 MB.
    Further in my case according to Activity Monitor none of that space is being used as reported in "Swap Used"
    I believe the big increase you see is due the move of most system components to 64 bit and their potential to use more virtual memory.
    I suspect you will find similar figures for the swap file and a modest usage of it.
    I wouldn't worry.
    Steve

  • Extended memory is virtual memory space or Real Memory ?

    HI ,
    I would like to know whether the extended memory is virtual memory or its real memory. What is the parameter used to set the usage of the real memory of the system and the virtual memory of the system ( I want to know with ref to UNIX environment), and also clear about the hep memory( virtual or real).
    Thanks in Advance
    Rajesh Babu

    Hi, I hope this will help:
    The virtual memory consist of physical memory and OS swap space. Virtual memory can be allocated by the SAP system.
    In the virtual memory exist shared memory and local memory.
    Your question was regarding extended memory. Extended memory (user context) exist in shared memory. Heap memory exist in local memory.
    Check this for more information on this topic:
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/02/96279d538111d1891b0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]

  • Virtual memory permissions/privileges

    I've always worked fine whit Adobe Photoshop CS5, but recently when I try to open it I get this message:
    Roughly translated it says: "Unable to open a virtual memory file because the file is locked or does not have the necessary access privileges. Use the command 'Get Info in the Finder to unlock the file, or change the permissions of this or folders where it is."
    I try the "Repair Disk Permissions" option in the Disk Utility:
    But it did not work.
    So, can anyone help me solving this issue?
    Thank you very much in advance.

    Hi Esteban,
    Is this when trying to open the app, or a specific file?
    Click once on the file in question, hold down the command key and press the i key (this is "Get Info").
    At the bottom of the window that opens, it lists the permissions.
    Depending on what it says, you may have to change one or more (by clicking on the lock in the lower right hand corner of the window). I don't have CS5 so I don't know if that needs special settings, but before changing any of the settings, it would probably be best to post them here and maybe we can figure it out or someone who has it can share their settings.

  • Virtual Memory Remains

    Hello.  I'm using Diadem 2011, and I'm using it to open very large files.  2GB up to 14GB.  It handles it just fine, except that I get what appear to be virtual memory files that do not get deleted when I close diadem.  Each file is 2GB and it resides the AppData/Local/National Instruments/DIAdem/2011 folder.  Eventually, my hard drive will fill up and I have to delete these files manually.  I don't seem to experience any negative side effects from deleting them, so my question is, how do I get Diadem to delete the files automatically? 
    This has only happened a couple times now, and it's possible that this is related to Diadem crashing... Perhaps the virtual memory does not get deleted if DIAdem crashes?
    Anyway, is there a setting to get rid of these automagically, or should I code a startup script to delete the files at startup? 
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    I think you refer to some files called like ddt*.tmp?
    You are right that DIAdem uses these files to swap if the data to be loaded does not fit into memory. If DIAdem crashes, it might happen that these files are not deleted. However, DIAdem should be able to delete them during next start itself.
    If DIAdem does not delete them, it is safe to manually delete them.

Maybe you are looking for