[WAD] Multi-Header Implementation ??

Hi... Experts...
I should download  data of the table component from WAD.
If The Standard Download Function of SAP is used that Additional Header can not download making the javascript.
(It makes a new header on the top to merge two and above item of The Bex. )
I wonder how can i download to the excel with Header.
please, would you like to answer quickly for me?!., as soon as possible .
Thanks
Edited by: youn Jai Jun on Apr 28, 2008 11:07 AM

Hi,
If you could give us the source and target structure with occurrences, it could be easy for us to suggest.
Best regards,
raj.

Similar Messages

  • Align for multi-header renderer in JTable

    Hi,
    I have a question about multi-header renderer in JTable. Here is the problem, please help me:
    I used the MultiLineHeaderRenderer class example from
    http://www2.gol.com/users/tame/swing/examples/JTableExamples1.html
    This example makes the header to be centered (as setHorizontalAlignment(JLabel.CENTER)). Also, it is for the all the headers with 2 lines (i don't know how to describe it).
    In my project, I have just a few header with 2 lines, most of them are one line. By using this example renderer class, I have the header height is bigger, of course because of some 2 lines headers, and one line header is automatically set as the TOP. What I want is to make one line header to be set as the BOTTOM just like in EXCEL.
    Please help me, sorry for my technical explaination (poor huh?)
    Thanks in advance.

    If I understand correctly just put a space then a new line before your text for your cell that you want the text at the bottom.
    like this: " \nBottom Text"
    You'll need the leading space because of how StringTokenizer works.

  • Multi-head setup without xorg.conf

    I'm using the newer method of running X without an xorg.conf and want a traditional multi-head setup (a "Normal multi-head" method, allowing a separate X session on each of the monitors).
    I would use this to have a different window manager run on each of the screens (something like the following for OpenBox: DISPLAY=:0.1 openbox), perhaps with the aid of Switchscreen.
    XRandR will give me one big virtual screen (and is currently how I'm doing it, combined with xnest), but that's not what I want. Any ideas?

    WooHoo !
    awkwood   -  You Rock ! I feel like an idiot for not paying closer attention to your first post. I finally realized what you were saying and figured out how to do the downgrade.
    If it's 2.12.0 I'd suggest trying 2.11.0 instead.
    The most recent update borked my dual display with a similar error message but 2.11 works fine.
    I don't use an xorg.conf.
    So essentially this seems to be a bug with version 2.12 of the xf86-video-intel driver. I downgraded to ver 2.11 and everything works perfectly. I am running dual monitors at full resolution with no fuss. So again awkwood I thank you !
    For other Arch Newbies who have this issue in the mean time until they fix the bug, this is how I did the downgrade.
    Step 1:
    download the 2.11 package from the link below
    http://arm.konnichi.com/extra/os/i686/x … pkg.tar.xz
    Step 2:
    Open a terminal and cd to the directory where you saved the file
    $ cd /home/$USERNAME/Downloads
    Step 3:
    Use pacman to install the package
    sudo pacman -U xf86-video-intel-2.11.0-2-i686.pkg.tar.xz
    Finally reboot. When you log back in everything should work fine
    Again thanks to awkwood as well as karol, blind, Inxsible and everyone else for their help. Everyone here is so helpful, I am defiantly an Arch user for life. Hopefully they will fix the bug in the next version of the driver. My next step is to see about filling a bug report.

  • WAD Report Heading display

    Deall All,
    is it possible to display variable value in WAD report result header!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.
    For example: I have variable on FISCPER on report, if i give 001.2009 as input, i should get result header as Result for perod
    " period input value "
    In above case i should get result header as.... Result for perod 001.2009
    Thanks in advance
    Regards,
    J B

    Hi,
    For  new customer defined image follow the following path.
    Tcode : SE80
    MIME Repository -> BW -> Customer -> Image ->
    Create new mime object here that will available in WAD .
    Regards,
    Ganesh.

  • C++ header implementation

    Hello,
    I've had this question before, but now I'm trying it from a new
    approach. THe first time I tried to implement this headerfile in
    LABVIEW 6.1 I tried a direct approach, but that didn't work out well.
    My project is to implement the GetParmType stucture from this headerfile into a LABVIEW application.
    The approach I'm trying at this moment is to build an array of 326 bytes, and fill this array with the data from my EEPROM.
    The first 64Bytes is :        
    char           
    Version[VERSION_LEN];
    the next 2 bytes are the:    unsigned short  DeviceId;
    (this is the DeviceInfoType structure)
    the next byte is:                unsigned char   NrChannels;
    then 2 bytes for:               unsigned short  NrPixels;
    and 1 byte for:           
          unsigned char   Sensor;
    (this is the DeviceConfigType
    the rest of the array should be filled with the ChannelParmType
    structure. The maximum devices that can be connected is 8 pieces, so
    this should be a loop that runs the 8 times.
    Can somebody help me with this? I have no idea how this is done or how to fill an array this way.
    The headerfile is attached.
    Many thanx
    Koert
    Attachments:
    avs_dll.h ‏61 KB

    Lycangeek wrote:
    The DeviceConfigType is a great example of what I mentioned before about the dangers of mapping C structures to LV...   typedef struct
        unsigned char   NrChannels;         // number of channels
    unsigned short 
    NrPixels;          
    // number of pixels
        unsigned char  
    Sensor;            
    // Sensortype
    } DeviceConfigType;
    Typically in C/C++, you are going to have the compiler set to a 4-byte alignment (this is the default for 32-bit Windows).
    I
    think Visual C (at least in version 6) uses a default alignement of 8
    byte. However variables are usually aligned to the lesser of the
    default alignement or the variable size. So I would hazard that this
    particular structure actually would take up 5 byte since Visual C will
    add a fill byte between NrChannels and NrPixels.
    However you are right that in my example I didn't account for padding
    at all. Another problem is that there will be three additional fill
    bytes after Sensor, to make the first float in the ChannelArray align
    on a four byte boundary.
    So this would probably mean that for the DeviceConfig we should copy
    out at least 7 bytes and add a fill byte between channels and pixels
    and the offset for the channel array should be 74 instead of 70. Also
    the array intialization should then be 330 instead of 326.
    There still are some uncertainities. Unless the #pragma pack(x)
    statement is in the header file (in this case not) you still can't be
    certain that the DLL was compiled with the default alignment, although
    it is quite likely.
    Rolf Kalbermatter
    Rolf Kalbermatter
    CIT Engineering Netherlands
    a division of Test & Measurement Solutions

  • Multi-Org Implementation of EDI / e Commerce Gateway

    We are implementing EDI Gateway on R11.03 (also upgrading to 11.5.2) in a Multi-Org, MRC, MLS single installation of Purchasing. I have been told that there is no way to make the Gateway Org specific, although multiple installations of the Gateway should give the same effect.
    Has anyone attempted to multi-org EDI Gateway? If so, how?
    Thanks!

    Hi Kamleshwar
    You can replace both of them by taking the data from b2b and putting them to staging tables( in case of orders) using integration tools like bpel or writing simpel PL/SQL to dequeu message from ques. One the data is in staging then u can write concurent porgrams
    This approach is good if you have lot of customizations to be done.
    But if you want to follow the standards then use XML gateways/ECG gateways. Its just need confugring(like TP) and you get the whole bunch of data. ECG generates .dat files and u need some transaltor to read these files and then load to b2b.Same goes with XML agetways. ECG and XML getway both have there own benifits, best of XML ebeing we get evrything in XML format making it easy to translate
    Regards
    Sahil

  • Multi-Header, Detail and Trailer Record

    Hi,
    I have to plants, For Each plant i need Header, no.of Details and one trailer Record i need.
    Like
    Plant 1000
    Header1
    Deatail Record1
    Deatail Record2
    Deatail Record3
    Trailer1
    for plant 2000
    Header2
    Deatail Record1
    Deatail Record2
    Deatail Record3
    Trailer2
    Thanks!
    Regards,
    SReddy

    Hi,
    If you could give us the source and target structure with occurrences, it could be easy for us to suggest.
    Best regards,
    raj.

  • BSPWM Multi-Head Setup

    I've been trying to figure out how to setup dual monitors on BSPWM with different resolutions. So far I can only have 1920x1080 on one monitor or 1680x1050 on both, obviously having a lower resolution on a 1080p monitor is pretty ugly.
    Is there a solution for this?

    Hi phrakture,
    I actually tested it (unsuccessfully)  2 years ago on a Debian Woody. I only had 1 PC at that time and i wanted to try to provide dual access to it to my wife and me. And, having used a multi-terminal platform (VT100 powered ) as student, i thought it was quite fun to give it a try!
    Since i had no dualhead video card, i used 2 video cards:
    - Terminal 1: PS/2 Keyboard + PS/2 Mouse + Geforce 2 MX (AGP) +  15'' screen (color)
    - Terminal 2: USB Keyboard + USB Mouse + S3 Virge (PCI) +  14'' screen (mono)
    Writing a correct XF86Config file was not difficult. The problems i had were with the hardware and the kernel.
    First, from what i remember, i had to find a PCI card as secondary card. I don't remember precisely why, maybe it was simply by conception of the PC architecture, but you could not manage to have 2 AGP cards working at the same time.
    But the main problem was to have this work on Linux. From what i understood, the terminal layer of the 2.4 kernel locked resources in such a way that could not let XFree handle more than one real terminal at the same time. In other words: one screen worked, the other did not.
    The patches from http://cambuca.ldhs.cetuc.puc-rio.br/multiuser/ did not help me (the XFree version of Debian was quite different from upstream, with already many patches). From what i know the 2.5.x kernel series saw a refactoring of the terminal layer, but it happened much after i had given up.
    At first i had thought that such a setup would work naturally thanks to X design, but in fact i spent much time to end up on blocking, low-level, not-so-well-documented OS problems.
    The good news for me is that now i have 2 PCs at home, so i have no need to try this anymore
    If you try it on your side - and manage to build a working setup, i am sure that many will be interested though!. Personnally i would be very interested to know if it works on other OSes too (esp. BSDs).

  • Multi Language implementation

    I want my project to be used in both languages i.e English and German. How can i do that. Is using unicode wud help me, but how can i implement that

    http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/i18n/index.html

  • Dual link? SLI multi-head?

    Hi all.
    A couple of quick technical questions. I own an IBM T221(9503)-DG5 monitor, which can be driven from a dual link DVI connector (plus a single link one).
    The NX6800GT-T2D256E is listed as having dual link support (in the chipset on the main page, and I believe there's a PDF which claims it too). However, I know there's been some confusion in the past - I understand that nVidia's reference 6800 boards really did have dual link (two SiI178s per output) connectors, but that these have been left out by all consumer manufacturers so far, and some other nVidia board manufacturers (e.g. Innovision) are still claiming dual-link support despite the fact that their cards provide two single link outputs. On the other hand, it's promising that none of MSI's other cards are listed as having dual link support.
    Can anyone confirm for me that this MSI board really *does* have dual-link support on at least one of its heads? Currently the only boards with this feature are workstation class (Quadros, FireGLs, Realizms, etc.) and the Apple DDL boards (the 30" cinema display also needs a dual link connector). Since I've no need for the other features of workstation boards, I don't really want to pay that kind of money for a part which is different only in some $30 interface chips... so I'll buy the MSI part like a shot if the support is there. MSI UK haven't yet been able to confirm with head office for me.
    Corollary: if there's an impending 6800Ultra version with the same connectors, I'll gladly wait for that instead!
    In a related topic, as noted above my monitor is best driven from two DVI outputs (one dual link, one single). However, I've heard a rumour that SLI is only supported on one head - I know it disables the output from one card, but this is more restrictive. In my case, both heads are driving the same display, so in theory the driver ought to be able to cope by treating both outputs as one frame buffer... but can anyone give me details on the behaviour I can expect? If I have to switch to driving from a single head, there's little benefit to me from trying to run an SLI system - at that would lean me even more towards a 6800Ultra, if one is in the pipeline.
    I'll need to buy a PCI-E system in which to put the MSI card, so I'm keen to be sure of myself before ordering even if I could return the MSI card should it not work as advertised.
    Thanks in advance for any information.
    Andrew Garrard
    Prospective system:
    Tyan 2895 (dual Opteron SLI)
    MSI NX6800GT-T2D256E (x2?)
    Current system:
    Rioworks HDAMB (dual Opteron AGP)
    3Dlabs VP990
    PCI FX5200 (256Mb)
    512Mb RAM
    XP Pro
    T221-DG5 (off the VP990, 2x single-link)
    Iiyama VMPro 454 (off the FX5200)
    Tagan 480W PSU
    That's probably about all that's relevant...
    Oh, and based in the UK.

    Since I found out the answer to my own question...
    The PCI-E 6800GT (OEM version of the NX6800GT-T2D256E) which I've got *really is* dual link - I can drive 3840x2400 at 25Hz from a single head, and there appear to be two SiI178s on board. Big hand to MSI. This presumably means that the board would be capable of driving Apple 30" cinema displays, although reports from people with Quadros suggest that the Apple display is a bit temperamental.
    Unfortunately, I've had trouble getting the single link head to run 1216x2400 at 48Hz, so I've not got the whole display running at 48Hz yet, but I'm told that may be an issue with newer drivers so I'll try again (or play with PowerStrip). There's always quad head mode if I give up on SLi...
    A word of warning: the second head on this card is DVI-D only - that is, it's a DVI-I connector, but with no analogue pins connected, so you can't use a DVI/SVGA adaptor to plug in an analogue monitor except on the primary head. That means that if you want a 30" Apple plus a CRT, budget for a second card...
    I'm waiting on a new motherboard before I can answer my SLi question, but I can live with the options I've got even if I don't quite manage everything I'd hoped for.
    Andrew Garrard

  • Multi-user multi-head setup

    Purely out of curiosity, I would like to create the following setup:
    Computers: 1 (i.e. 1 motherboard)
    Physical displays: N
    Keyboards, mice: N
    Processor: >= N cores
    ...and have a separate tty allocated to each monitor/mouse/keyboard group such that N non-root users can simultaneously work on a single box, in independent desktop environments and unable to interfere with each other.  The processor criterion is to ensure that each user has at least one core "of their own" via affinity masking, so no one user can monopolise CPU resources. RAM and I/O resources are something that I'll think about at a later date.
    The idea is to allow multiple non-root users to simultaneously work on one computer in such a way that they cannot interfere with each other's sessions in any destructive way (e.g. reboot, kill processes, hijack session, etc).
    Could anyone point me in the right direction ( configurations / supported graphics vendors / kernel parameters ) for this?
    I have no real use for this (particularly with how cheap VDI is), it is purely an academic curiosity.
    Last edited by windows_me (2014-01-29 21:12:03)

    @Nattgew:
    Cheap USB video adapters will be fine for testing, and I can probably bag some powerful old Radeons (48xx) on the cheap, each of which will drive at least 2 screens.  Alternatively, I could probably daisychain a bunch of higher-end cheap monitors (e.g. Dell U2312) via DisplayPort.
    @slithery:
    Cheers!  I got nothing but flaming when I asked on the Ubuntu forums, you've solved the problem in a single word ("multiseat")!

  • Multi Language implementation for on screen keyboard

    Hi,
    I live in Belgium where we speak several languages.
    It is very annoying to type an english email using the dutch keyboard layout, since spelling correction will try to change the email into Dutch (unless i turn of spelling correction, but that's not ideal either).
    If i change the keyboard to english, i will have the correct spelling correction, but the layout of the keyboard will change to Querty.
    I can't be the only person in the world that feels this is not working as it should. Why is it not possible to change the language of spelling correction without changing the keyboard layout or am i missing something?
    Best Regards,
    Peter

    Hi Peter,
    You feedback on this feature is really importance, I will help to record this.
    Please understand that to delivery a new feature in Windows will require many business justification and evaluation, and it will take some time.
    Kate Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • Magic Mouse Scaling on multi-head display

    Hello,
    I have a 30" Apple display along with another 23" display sitting next it. Normally, I can address both screens with a very simple wrist movement using my Razer diamondback mouse. This mouse seems to have some sort of built-in scaling that works great (word to the wise, NEVER install the Razer software, just use the standard Apple mouse driver settings and it works fantastically).
    So this setup works great for me, but I really wanted to use the new Magic Mouse with its multiswipe goodness. Unfortunately, after installing it, and even after setting the mouse tracking to maximum, I can't get the cursor to move all the way across the screen as I can with my Razer.
    Anyone else have this problem?
    Thanks,
    Vik

    If the maximum setting for scaling of the tracking speed is insufficient, there is a way to manually set the scaling higher using a terminal command. This explains how to do it
    http://www.tylernichols.com/apple/speed-up-mouse-tracking-on-mac-os-x
    You can use a number other than 5.0, of course. And if you use the Mouse pane to adjust the tracking speed again, it will go back to the previous limits.

  • Implementing portal for multi lingual rollout

    Hello Experts-
    Can any one point me to good documents or articles for multi lingual implementations of portals for EP 7.0
    Thanks,
    Raj.

    SAP Help Links:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/74/641640b7b6dd5fe10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/21/9499f2f50ca44a85e9611f14fbdc21/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/42/938297a5061d69e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/ef/ca8f2c28ce11d5b2be0050da3f31b1/frameset.htm
    Translation of SAP Portal Content
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/SRM/TranslationofEnterprisePortalContent
    Internationalization of Webdynpro applications
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c6cfad90-0201-0010-a5b8-8f9486346059?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
    Internationalization in NWDS
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/4f5b88e5-0601-0010-cd99-8b88a4d92816?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
    Internationalization in WD4A applications
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c069b075-e48f-2c10-66ba-f57442c9076c?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true

  • Multi-Org impact on Oracle CRM modules especially on Oracle Service

    Multi-Org impact on Oracle CRM modules especially on Oracle Service
    ====================================================
    I have been searching for any information (notes,whitepapers/ presentation) on the impact of multi org implementation on Oracle Service module and so far not been able to find any either on metalink or on internet.
    Any of you have any inputs on this ? Please provide the same if any.
    basically,
    Looking for the kind of security applied on SR creation form,Debrief form and charges form when a multi org is enabled.
    I also tried to test this out in our instance and found that it seems to have no impact.
    Gana

    HI,
    Yes indeed there is a impact of MULTI-ORG on the Service Module in 11i.
    All the things are integrated now.
    Everything is dependent on the MO:Operating Unit Profile Option and the setup which you had done.
    1)
    Security on SR creation Form:-
    See you can implement the security, but for that you have to setup accordinglly and also to follow the process.
    If you create 2 responsibilities with MO profile option different, then none of them will able to see the others data.
    Note:-
    But if you are using the instance to generate the SR, then you had to make it sure that the ITEM which you are using should be assigned to the Operating unit which is set in the MO profile Options of that responsibility.
    2)
    Debrief Form:-
    As you must know that for debrief to work, you had to setup the Service Activities.
    This is where you can define the security.
    1) Create a Service activity,
    2) Map it with BILLING TYPES
    3) Map the Billing Types with Order Management Header and the Line Type
    This the place where you can specify the Operating Unit.
    When a user will log in and open a debrief form, then he will be able to see only those service activities which are mapped with the operating unit as that of set in MO Profile Option to the user.
    3)
    Charges:-
    The same as the debrief is applied on the charges TAB.
    Here you will only able to see the Service activites which are mapped with the operating unit as that of set in MO operating unit.
    If you want ITEM level security, then you will be only able to see the items which are assigned to the Operating unit as that of set in the MO profile option.
    Hope this will clear your doubt.
    If want more clarification, you can ask me.
    Regds,
    Vikram

Maybe you are looking for