Warning in config of UWL

Hi,
I'am configuring UWL.
I created a systen with alias SAP_XSS_WebDynpro.
Now i'am workiing on UWL config.
When i enter the data Alias name and when i click on save in UWL administration it is giving me a warning message " Could not verify if the backend of system SAP_XSS_WebDynpro is configured for optimized delta pull"
Can anybody guide me to rectify this warning.
With Regards,
Pradeep.B

Hi Pradeep,
For more info on Delta Pull Mechanish check this [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwce10/helpdata/en/eb/101fa0a53244deb955f6f91929e400/content.htm],
till then you can remove the entries from
Delta Pull Channel Refresh Period (in Seconds):
Delta Pull Channel Snapshot Refresh Period (in Minutes):
and try saving.
Kind Regards,
Mrityunjay

Similar Messages

Warning: All config files need conf:/etc/modprobe/sound

when I boot I get about 20 of these messages which slows my booting way down.
"Warning: All config files need conf:/etc/modprobe/sound,it will be ignored in future releases"
What can I do do make it go away?

You can search the forums and read the news on the frontpage before upgrading - Wonder linked you to the specific message.
This has been covered over and over.

FCV3 : Customer Credit Early Warning List : Config

Dear Experts,
I m making config for Customer Credit Early Warning List, which is displayed thru SAP Easy Access T-Code FCV3 to the users
i referred to SAP Notes : 313200 & 439296 and did the config as follows in Customizing T-Code OBZJ :
A. Procedure Parameters for Credit Check :
      1. checked on : Read A/R Summary
      2. checked on : Read A/R Summary from an external system
      3. checked on : Create A/R Summary
B. Procedure Parameters for DSO :
      1. checked on : all children
      2. checked on : current balance
      3. number of months : 3
when i execute T-Code FCV3, i m still not finding any output.
Please help & guide, if i have missed any more config part.
Edited by: Hussein Merchant on Feb 11, 2010 1:31 PM

You need to execute the program RFCMCRCV from transaction SE38 for creating the A/R summary so that you will be able to view report.
Hope this will resolve.

UWL CONFIG FIELD MAPPING

Hi all,
We have done some config in UWL by uploading XML file so that the workitem displayed in the manager's inbox(UWL) has got one box where he(manager) enters some text if he accepts or rejects the workitem.
The filed in XML file is
< action property u201CUserDecisionNoteTextu201D>
I am not able to locate to which field this text which manager enters is mapped to R/3.I require the field to which it si mapped as i require it for further processing.

Hi,
Check the below may be usefull.
What you need to is to modify the section or add new parameters if it doesn't. Here's a sample custom task/item type configured to launch a custom web dynpro application with the work item ID as a parameter, you can modify this according to your needs:
code <ItemType name="uwl.task.webflow.TS.SAP_R3_HumanResources" connector="WebFlowConnector" defaultView="webflowView" defaultAction="launchWebDynPro" executionMode="pessimistic">
<ItemTypeCriteria systemId="SAP_R3_HumanResources" externalType="TS9" connector="WebFlowConnector"/>
<Actions>
<Action name="launchWebDynPro" groupAction="" handler="SAPWebDynproLauncher" returnToDetailViewAllowed="yes" launchInNewWindow="yes">
<Properties>
<Property name="WebDynproApplication" value="Approval"/>
<Property name="WebDynproDeployableObject" value="DC"/>
<Property name="DynamicParameter" value="wi_id=${item.externalId}"/>
<Property name="display_order_priority" value="1"/>
</Properties>
<Descriptions default=""/>
</Action>
</Actions>
</ItemType>[/code]

[SOLVED]Warning booting: All config files need .conf

Recently i get this boot message:
WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/modprobe.conf.pacnew,
I have another file called modprobe.conf.
Do I just need to rename/delete the file??
Thanks in advance.
Last edited by Hyugga (2011-11-14 00:05:15)

Yes... you should ALWAYS vimdiff (or whatever) your pacnew files against their existing counter parts to capture changes from the devs first!
http://amjith.blogspot.com/2008/08/quic … orial.html

C4500 VSS quad - incorrect config synchronisation

Testing two C4510R+E chassis VSS in quad supervisor 7-E configuration.
All 4 sups. had the same basic configuration – converted to VSS and added VSL ports (same in each chassis).
During testing I inserted one more linecard to each chassis and added one port from the card to VSL. All worked fine. Then I removed active sup., booted previously ROMMON booted sup. to IOS and config was synchronized from ACTIVE to STANDBY sup. and VSL config was updated. Again, all worked fine.
But the I realized incorrect seting of calendar so I began to change UTC calendar time from factory to local setting. Change active - active synchronizes to standby, switchover, boot second sup. etc. But after second switchover, on ACTIVE sup console appeared warning, that config was synchronized from STANDBY to ACTIVE!
First I was thinking about version revisions of configuration – higher revision would have higher priority, but did not find any information about it so could the time synchronization be problem.? I was changing approx. +7h from factory settings.
Does anybody have any experience with this behavior?
Note: the log bellow is from Active sup. that had factory time setting and Standby sup. (probably) had updated time.
*Jul 30 07:41:53.631: %C4K_REDUNDANCY-6-MODE: ACTIVE supervisor initializing for sso mode
*Jul 30 07:41:56.632: %C4K_IOSMODPORTMAN-6-MODULEONLINE: Module 5 (WS-X45-SUP7-E S/N: CAT1823L0UY Hw: 2.1) is online
*Jul 30 07:41:56.678: %C4K_REDUNDANCY-6-MODE: ACTIVE supervisor initializing for sso mode
*Jul 30 07:41:57.190: %C4K_REDUNDANCY-3-COMMUNICATION: Communication with the peer Supervisor has been established
*Jul 30 07:42:07.174: %C4K_REDUNDANCY-5-CONFIGSYNC: The bootvar has been successfully synchronized to the standby supervisor
*Jul 30 07:42:07.175: %C4K_REDUNDANCY-5-CONFIGSYNC: The config-reg has been successfully synchronized to the standby supervisor
*Jul 30 07:42:07.176: %C4K_REDUNDANCY-5-CALENDAR: The calendar has been successfully synchronized to the standby supervisor for the first time
*Jul 30 07:42:07.176: %C4K_REDUNDANCY-5-CONFIGSYNC: The startup-config has been successfully synchronized to the standby supervisor
*Jul 30 07:42:07.696: %C4K_REDUNDANCY-5-CONFIGSYNC: The private-config has been successfully synchronized to the standby supervisor
*Jul 30 07:42:08.725: %C4K_REDUNDANCY-5-CONFIGSYNC_RATELIMIT: The vlan database has been successfully synchronized to the standby supervisor
******************** WARNING ********************
* Config on Active changed due to new info *
* from Standby. Saving original config on *
* Active as startup-config.saved_vs-TIMESTAMP. *
switchport
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
Saved startup config to bootflash: ****
Thanks.
Jarek

Java APM Agent initialization failed: SEAgent.config.xml does not have a valid event sender configured

Today I tried to configure JAVA APM on a CentOS 6.4 server with tomcat6 installed through the normal RPM package. Adding this server to SCOM was no problem and it shows itself as a 'Deep Monitored Configuration'. The last part of enabling
JAVA APM fails. I have followed the following process:
1. Imported the JAVA APM MP's
2. Extracted the JAVA APM Files
3. Copied those files to my CentOS server
4. Added the JAVA_OPTS to my tomcat configuration file
5. Restarted Tomcat
When I look for the log file which needs to be created through the installation of the APM agent it cannot be find. When I look into my Catalina.out file I see the following errors:
Mar 05, 2014 7:05:16 PM com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.Log.SystemLogger error
SEVERE: Java APM Agent initialization failed: SEAgent.config.xml does not have a valid event sender configured
com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.Exception.ApmException: SEAgent.config.xml does not have a valid event sender configured
        at com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.AgentThreadManager.<init>(Unknown Source)
        at com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.AgentThreadManager.<init>(Unknown Source)
        at com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.Agent.Monitor.AgentContext.<init>(Unknown Source)
        at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
        at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:525)
        at com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.Agent.Startup.AgentContextLoader.loadContext(Unknown Source)
        at com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.Agent.Startup.Agent.premain(Unknown Source)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
        at sun.instrument.InstrumentationImpl.loadClassAndStartAgent(InstrumentationImpl.java:382)
        at sun.instrument.InstrumentationImpl.loadClassAndCallPremain(InstrumentationImpl.java:397)
Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
        at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
        at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:525)
        ... 15 more
Caused by: com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.Exception.ApmException: Error registering MBean: com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent:type=COUNTER
        at com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.EventSender.MBeanEventLog.registerMetricMBeans(Unknown Source)
        at com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.EventSender.MBeanEventLog.<init>(Unknown Source)
        at com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.EventSender.MBeanEventLog.<init>(Unknown Source)
        at com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.AgentThreadManager.<init>(Unknown Source)
        at com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.AgentThreadManager.<init>(Unknown Source)
        at com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.Agent.Monitor.AgentContext.<init>(Unknown Source)
        at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
        at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:525)
        at com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.Agent.Startup.AgentContextLoader.loadContext(Unknown Source)
        at com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.Agent.Startup.Agent.premain(Unknown Source)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
        at sun.instrument.InstrumentationImpl.loadClassAndStartAgent(InstrumentationImpl.java:382)
        at sun.instrument.InstrumentationImpl.loadClassAndCallPremain(InstrumentationImpl.java:397)
Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
        at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
        at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:525)
        ... 15 more
Caused by: com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.Exception.ApmException: Error registering MBean: com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent:type=COUNTER
        at com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.EventSender.MBeanEventLog.registerMetricMBeans(Unknown Source)
        at com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.EventSender.MBeanEventLog.<init>(Unknown Source)
        at com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.EventSender.MBeanEventLog.<init>(Unknown Source)
        ... 19 more
Mar 05, 2014 7:05:16 PM com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.Log.SystemLogger info
INFO: Java APM Agent loading failed (Build: 1.10.100.15, Label: NotFromLabel, BuildDate: 20131112)
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
        at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
        at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:525)
        at com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.Agent.Startup.AgentContextLoader.loadContext(Unknown Source)
        at com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.Agent.Startup.Agent.premain(Unknown Source)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
        at sun.instrument.InstrumentationImpl.loadClassAndStartAgent(InstrumentationImpl.java:382)
        at sun.instrument.InstrumentationImpl.loadClassAndCallPremain(InstrumentationImpl.java:397)
Caused by: java.lang.InstantiationException: Monitor initialization failed: SEAgent.config.xml does not have a valid event sender configured
        at com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.Agent.Monitor.AgentContext.<init>(Unknown Source)
        ... 12 more
Does anyone have seen this error before? Can someone help me with this one?
Thnx,

I'm running tomcat on a CentOS release 6.4 (Final) server. I installed Tomcat 6 through an RPM from the CentOS sources. I have installed Apache Tomcat/6.0.24 wit JVM version 1.7.0_09-icedtea-mockbuild_2013_01_16_18_52-b00, the JVM Vendor is Oracle Corporation.
My tomcat configuration needs to be done in '/etc/tomcat6/tomcat6.conf'
I installed the APM Agent in the path '/opt/apm/' with the rights 40755 (root/root). The files have the following rights:
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root tomcat 32046 Mar 3 15:38 apm_facade.jar
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root tomcat 244819 Mar 3 15:38 apm_monitor.jar
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root tomcat 38110 Mar 3 15:38 apm_producers.jar
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root tomcat 207006 Mar 3 15:38 asm-all-3.3.1.jar
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root tomcat   4157 Mar 3 15:38 ASM_Third_Party_Notices.txt
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root tomcat 241368 Mar 3 15:38 DispatcherStub.dll
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root tomcat 36880 Mar 3 15:38 pmonitor.config.xml
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root tomcat   2625 Mar 3 15:38 SEAgent.config.xml
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root tomcat    830 Mar 5 15:19 Starter.properties
The above rights are equal to the /etc/tomcat6 directory with the tomcat configuration files.
In the tomcat6.conf I have added the following entries:
#Microsoft SCOM APM
JAVA_OPTS="${JAVA_OPTS} -Djava.library.path=/opt/apm"
JAVA_OPTS="${JAVA_OPTS} -javaagent:/opt/apm/apm_facade.jar -Xbootclasspath/p:/opt/apm/apm_producers.jar -Xbootclasspath/p:/opt/apm/apm_facade.jar"
When I look into the running tomcat process I see the following:
tomcat   17401     1 0 Mar05 ?        00:00:39 /usr/lib/jvm/jre/bin/java -Djava.library.path=/opt/apm -javaagent:/opt/apm/apm_facade.jar -Xbootclasspath/p:/opt/apm/apm_producers.jar -Xbootclasspath/p:/opt/apm/apm_facade.jar
-Djavax.sql.DataSource.Factory=org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory -Djava.library.path=/opt/apm -javaagent:/opt/apm/apm_facade.jar -Xbootclasspath/p:/opt/apm/apm_producers.jar -Xbootclasspath/p:/opt/apm/apm_facade.jar -Djavax.sql.DataSource.Factory=org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory
-classpath :/usr/share/tomcat6/bin/bootstrap.jar:/usr/share/tomcat6/bin/tomcat-juli.jar:/usr/share/java/commons-daemon.jar -Dcatalina.base=/usr/share/tomcat6 -Dcatalina.home=/usr/share/tomcat6 -Djava.endorsed.dirs= -Djava.io.tmpdir=/var/cache/tomcat6/temp
-Djava.util.logging.config.file=/usr/share/tomcat6/conf/logging.properties -Djava.util.logging.manager=org.apache.juli.ClassLoaderLogManager org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap start
My Starter.Properties looks like this:
# Jars to load by inner classloader.
# Use semicolons to separate the JAR entries
ClassPath=apm_monitor.jar;asm-all-3.3.1.jar;apm_producers.jar
# Path to pmonitor.config
MonitorConfigFileName=pmonitor.config.xml
# Path to SEAgent.config
AgentConfigFileName=SEAgent.config.xml
# Log file name
# Example for full-path location:
#                  LogFileName=c:\\tracelog\\apm-java-agent.log
# Example for relative path (to agent jar files):
#                  LogFileName=apm-java-agent.log
LogFileName=apm-java-agent.log
# Log level (SEVERE, WARNING, INFO, CONFIG, FINE, FINER, FINEST)
# A level of FINER or FINEST may expose Personally identifiable
# information (PII) in the log file. The levels below INFO are
# intended for debugging and diagnostic use only.
LogLevel=FINEST
The 'apm-java-agent.log' is not created on the system. The only logging is done in the catalina.out. When restarting tomcat I see the following entries in te log file:
INFO: Initializing Java APM Agent (Build: 1.10.100.15, Label: NotFromLabel, BuildDate: 20131112)
Mar 06, 2014 9:35:21 AM com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.Log.SystemLogger info
INFO: Java APM Agent loading succeeded (Build: 1.10.100.15, Label: NotFromLabel, BuildDate: 20131112)
Mar 06, 2014 9:35:21 AM com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.Log.SystemLogger info
INFO: Initializing Java APM Agent (Build: 1.10.100.15, Label: NotFromLabel, BuildDate: 20131112)
Mar 06, 2014 9:35:21 AM com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.Log.SystemLogger warning
WARNING: Failed registering the COUNTER MBean
Mar 06, 2014 9:35:21 AM com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.Log.SystemLogger error
SEVERE: Java APM Agent initialization failed: SEAgent.config.xml does not have a valid event sender configured
Mar 06, 2014 9:35:21 AM com.microsoft.ManagementServices.APMAgent.Log.SystemLogger info
INFO: Java APM Agent loading failed (Build: 1.10.100.15, Label: NotFromLabel, BuildDate: 20131112)
Hope this gives your some more background around my problem, I double checked the permissions..

Salary and Employment Verification - UWL issue.

Hi All,
We have deployed ESS 1.41, MSS 1.41 and HRAS 1.41 business packages on Portal EP7.0 EHP1 SP7
When an Employee request for Salary and Employment Verification Letter by going thru ESS-> Benefits and Payament->Salary and Employment Verification, a workflow (std workflow WS01000045) is triggered and the task sits in inbox of HR Administrator. Task id is TS1000076. Now when we HR Admin open the workitem from R/3 inbox, it opens up a dialog box for printing the document.(PDF Form)
But these tasks are not visible under HR Administrators UWL iView in Portal. I have already checked the workflow system creation and its fine. For getting the tasks we need to maintain the task TS1000076 in SWFVISU. But we are not aware about what should be Type (JAVA webdynpro, ABAP Webdynpro, BSP etc.) and Visualization Parameters.
Could anyone guide me on these parameters and if any changes in XML config for UWL.
Regards,
Amol Ghodekar.

Below is the technical data if you are using US as country.
Technical Data
Runtime Technology
Web Dynpro Java iView
Technical Name of iView
com.sap.pct.erp.ess.employmentverif
Technical Name of Web Dynpro Application
sap.com/ess~us/EmploymentSalaryVerification
Service Key
EMPLOYEE_BENEFITPAY_EMPLOYMENTVERIF05
Available as of
SAP NetWeaver 2004s
Data Source
SAP ECC 6.0 or above
Software component
EA-HR
Support
PY-US
Support Languages
English
Refer below for details
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/en/87/1e3d4150c86e24e10000000a155106/content.htm

Salary and Employment Verification in HR Administration UWL

Hi All,
We have deployed ESS 1.41, MSS 1.41 and HRAS 1.41 business packages on Portal EP7.0 EHP1 SP7
When an Employee request for Salary and Employment Verification Letter by going thru ESS-> Benefits and Payament->Salary and Employment Verification, a workflow (std workflow WS01000045) is triggered and the task sits in inbox of HR Administrator. Task id is TS1000076. Now when HR Admin open the workitem from R/3 inbox, it opens up a dialog box for printing the document (PDF Form) .
But these tasks are not visible under HR Administrators UWL iView in Portal. I have already checked the workflow system creation and its fine. For getting the tasks we need to maintain the task TS1000076 in SWFVISU. But we are not aware about what should be Type (JAVA webdynpro, ABAP Webdynpro, BSP etc.) and its Visualization Parameters.
Could anyone guide me on these parameters and if any changes in XML config for UWL.
Regards,
Amol Ghodekar.

Hi Amol,
Configuring this in SWFVISU will help with the creation of the xml file telling the task how to launch and what to launch with: See the following help documentation:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/2c/05b15de3864040a9426788a12699b3/content.htm -
This is the documentation for action handlers.
Universal Worklist action handlers enable you to customize how a SAP Business Workflow work item is launched. So you will need to check too with the workflow specialist in your organization, but my guess would be that you would launch it with the Abap webdynpro launcher. By defining this in SWFVISU, when you press the reregister button on the webflow connector in the Universal Worklist administration, it generates the xml file and puts a definition in the file for launching the task.
Beth Maben
EP - Senior Support Consultant II
AGS Primary Support
Global Support Centre Ireland
Please see the UWL Wiki @
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/bpx/uwl+faq ***

Remove System Warnings for LSMW recording-Warning wont process data

Hello,
We have created a LSMW recording to upload Maintenance Plans. The maintenance plans being uploaded has cross company setting that our company utilizes. But, that corss company setting will provide a system warning when IP42 (Create Maintenance Plan) is run. When we manualy create a maintenance plan ,we can over write the warning by just pressing enter, but the lswm recording cant overwrite the system warning. The exact warning is: Message no. IO233 (Maint Plant 2000 and work center plant 1000 have different company codes).
Does anyone know how to remove the system warning in "Config" for Plant Maintenance or for this exact issue.
Thanks.

Check,Define System message in maintenance and service processing node.

Testing workflow in UWL

Hi,
I have a workflow in SAP, it works fine in SAP Gui, now the users are going to test the functionality of the same in UWL. The prerequisite config for UWL has been done. The custom methods are in background tasks in the workflow developed and which is going to be tested in UWL. we are using only the user decision task and edit task (although copied and edited). Do we have register these tasks in SWFVISU before they are tested? Please let me know the other prerequisites, like portal roles, mapping user to the exact .portal system etc.
Thanks,
S.

Hi,
If it is a user decision Task, then the SWFVISU is not required.
Just you need to Re-register the Tasks in Portal.
For the other things, Please search in the Portal forum.
Thanks.

Buttons donu00B4t appear in the UWL for UserDecisionHandler

Hi,
I try to make decisions avaible straight from the UWL using the UserDecisionHandler in my config:
<name="uwl.task.webflow.decision.admin.Procurement.TS14508044.SAP_EBP" connector="WebFlowConnector" defaultView="Procurement_DecisionTasksView" >
<ItemTypeCriteria systemId="SAP_EBP" externalType="TS14508044" connector="WebFlowConnector"/>
<Action name="approve" groupAction="yes" handler="UserDecisionHandler" returnToDetailViewAllowed="yes" launchInNewWindow="no" >
<Properties>
<Property name="decisionKey" value="2"/>
</Properties>
<Descriptions default="Approve">
</Descriptions>
</Action>
<Action name="reject" groupAction="yes" handler="UserDecisionHandler" returnToDetailViewAllowed="yes" launchInNewWindow="no" >
<Properties>
<Property name="decisionKey" value="1"/>
<Property name="UserDecisionNote" value="mandatory"/>
</Properties>
<Descriptions default="Reject">
</Descriptions>
</Action>
</Actions>
After I have cleared the cache and log off and on, not any buttons disabled as expected.
Thx for help

Hi thanks for your reply. Sorry, here is the whole code section:
<ItemType name="uwl.task.webflow.decision.admin.Procurement.TS14508044.SAP_EBP" connector="WebFlowConnector" defaultView="Procurement_DecisionTasksView" >
<ItemTypeCriteria systemId="SAP_EBP" externalType="TS14508044" connector="WebFlowConnector"/>
      <Actions>
<Action name="approve" groupAction="yes" handler="UserDecisionHandler" returnToDetailViewAllowed="yes" launchInNewWindow="no" >
   <Properties>
     <Property name="decisionKey" value="2"/>
   </Properties>
   <Descriptions default="Approve">
   </Descriptions>
</Action>
<Action name="reject" groupAction="yes" handler="UserDecisionHandler"            returnToDetailViewAllowed="yes" launchInNewWindow="no" >
    <Properties>
      <Property name="decisionKey" value="1"/>
      <Property name="UserDecisionNote" value="mandatory"/>
    </Properties>
    <Descriptions default="Reject">
   </Descriptions>
</Action>
</Actions>
</ItemType>
Greetings

Remove the view detail button from the UWL

After migrating from Ep 6 to EP 7 and importing the same standard launchhandling config for ESS and MSS in the UWL, a "View detail" button appears in the EP7 UWL for each workitem.
Does anyone know how to remove or disable this "View detail" button?
(When an end users clicks this button he can click to go to the SAP gui and to other functionlaity we don't want to offer.)

The item type config and uwl standard views are allready both configured towards our needs. We have experience in changing this config and tried to change it in order to remove the button. But there is no option for removing the "view detail" button, in this config. At least we didn't find it. Also in the help documentation from SAP about UWL (http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/39/a1bb5c4c0d4ab4a417e87ef35f1efa/frameset.htm) there is nothing to be found on the View Detail button.
We just don't want our users to see all the details from the workitem.
When this button is displayed users are also able to go to the SAP gui and this is highly undesired. Users should only approve / reject leave.
When the iview is displayed in the "normal mode" (not in the webdynpro mode) this button is no where to be found either. But in this mode the workitems cannot be started. It just opens a new portal page and not the ITS workitem.

Adding notes to decision task in UWL

Hi there WUGers,
We're looking into deploying UWL and I'm running into some "challenges."
First, we're on Portal release: SAP NetWeaver 7.0 (2004s) SPS 15, the backend is ECC 6.0 (Release: 700     0015     SAPKB70015)
What I want to do is to have the "generic decision step" allow me to enter a comment/notes when I select the "reject" option on a given work item, as I've read in numerous forums, WUG emails, etc...
The "standard" config in UWL for this task is:
    <ItemType name="uwl.task.webflow.TS00008267.EX3" connector="WebFlowConnector" defaultView="DefaultView" defaultAction="launchSAPAction" executionMode="default">
      <ItemTypeCriteria systemId="EX3" externalType="TS00008267" connector="WebFlowConnector"/>
      <Actions>
        <Action name="launchSAPAction" groupAction="" handler="SAPIACLauncher" returnToDetailViewAllowed="yes" launchInNewWindow="yes" launchNewWindowFeatures="resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes,status=yes,toolbar=no,menubar=no,location=no,directories=no">
          <Properties>
            <Property name="newWindowFeatures" value="resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes,status=yes,toolbar=no,menubar=no,location=no,directories=no"/>
            <Property name="openInNewWindow" value="yes"/>
            <Property name="display_order_priority" value="5"/>
            <Property name="IAC" value="BWWF_WI_DECI"/>
          </Properties>
          <Descriptions default=""/>
        </Action>
      </Actions>
    </ItemType>
When I created a custom XML for it (I did it verbatim according to the sample in Darren Hague's book and/or as shown in SAPHelp), and when doing so, I don't event get the decision task options to appear. All I get is "Forward" and "Cancel Assignment" buttons.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE UWLConfiguration PUBLIC '-//SAP//UWL1.0//EN' 'uwl_configuration.dtd'
>
<UWLConfiguration version="1.0">
<ItemTypes>
<ItemType name="uwl.task.webflow.decision.TS00008267" connector="WebFlowConnector" defaultView="DefaultView">
<ItemTypeCriteria connector="WebFlowConnector" externalType="TS00008267"/>
<Actions>
<Action name="Approve" groupAction="yes" handler="UserDecisionHandler">
   <Properties>
    <Property name="decisionKey" value="1"/>
   </Properties>
</Action>
<Action name="Reject" groupAction="yes" handler="UserDecisionHandler">
   <Properties>
    <Property name="decisionKey" value="2"/>
    <Property name="UserDecisionNote" value="mandatory"/>
   </Properties>
</Action>
</Actions>
</ItemType>
</ItemTypes>
</UWLConfiguration>
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Yours truly,
Joe Toledo

I had the same problem and it was all the XML. You need to make sure you register after you create your workflow and custom tasks. I then copied the generated XML ( uwl.webflow.clientname.xml ) to another file and deleted everything but my custom tasks. You have to do some modifications to show the decision buttons and have the note be mandatory for rejection or whatever your requirement is.
I posted this earlier at Re: Dobuts in modifying an UWL XML file. The XML doesn't show for some reason but if you hit reply on my message at the bottom and quote it, you will see it. This was a simple version with just one task.
[You can also download the full version with all tasks here|http://www.2shared.com/file/5688314/467ddbb2/final.html]
Make sure and set the priority to High after uploading.

Strange warning when bootiing up about modprobe.d/sound

Hi guys!
I get the following warning when i'm booting up
WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/sound, it will be ignored in a future release.
WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/sound, it will be ignored in a future release.
The file /etc/modprob.d/sound displays my sound card .
The sound is working fine . I'm using alsa and kdemod3 .
What might be the issue ?
Thanks for your help !

It means that you haven't read http://www.archlinux.org/news/450/

Warning in config of UWL

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for