WBS elements not deleted from PRPS table

Hi Experts,
In CJ20N transaction:
When I delete a project with project profile (ZABC):
- The project record is completely deleted from 'PROJ' table.
- The WBS records are completely deleted from 'PRPS' table.
When I delete another project with different project profile (ZXYZ):
- The project record is completely deleted from 'PROJ' table.
- The WBS records are NOT deleted from 'PRPS' table.
What is the reason for not deleting records from PRPS table?
Thanks in advance for your valuable answers.

WBS should be having actuals.

Similar Messages

Could not delete from specified table?

hi all,
i'm getting this error could not delete from specified table when i execute a delete on dbf file via JDBC-ODBC bridge, when i execute an update table command i get operation must use an updatable query, but i'm not updating the query returned from select statement.
Does anyone have similar problem before??

Hi,
my code is below:
try {
conn=DriverManager.getConnectio("jdbc:odbc:sui","","");
stmt = conn.createStatement();
int r= stmt.executeUpdate("Update Alarms set ACK=True WHERE DT = { d '" + msgdate + "' } AND TM= '" + msgtime + "'");
System.out.println(r+" records updated in Alarms ");
stmt.close();
conn.close();
stmt=null;
conn=null;
catch (NullPointerException e) {System.out.println(e.getMessage());}
catch (SQLException e) {System.out.println(e.getMessage());}
I have an ODBC datasource called sui and a table called alarms, i need to write into the column Ack to true when DT equals msgdate and TM equals msgtime, the error returned is Operation must use an updatable query.
I believe the SQL has no problem because there is no SQL syntax error and i'm not updating any resultset returned from select query.
When i delete, i get could not delete from specified table. Anyone has any idea wh'at's wrong?

Physical deletion of WBS elements from PRPS table

Hi Experts,
In CJ20N transaction:
When I delete a project with project profile (ZABC), the following actions are performed:
- The project entry are physically deleted from 'PROJ' table.
- The WBS entries are physically deleted from 'PRPS' table.
When I delete another with with project profile (ZXYZ), the following actions are perfomed:
- The project entry are physically deleted from 'PROJ' table.
- The WBS entries are NOT physically deleted from 'PRPS' table.
What is the reason for not deleting entries physically from PRPS table?
Thank you for your valuable answers.

Hi Experts,
In CJ20N transaction:
When I delete a project with project profile (ZABC):
- The project record is completely deleted from 'PROJ' table.
- The WBS records are completely deleted from 'PRPS' table.
When I delete another project with different project profile (ZXYZ):
- The project record is completely deleted from 'PROJ' table.
- The WBS records are NOT deleted from 'PRPS' table.
What is the reason for not deleting records from PRPS table for another project (Project profile: ZXYZ)?
Thanks in advance for your valuable answers.

While deleting project from CJ20N entries are not deleted from table PRPS

Hi,
I am deleting project from CJ20N then from PROJ table entries are getting deleted but WBS element entries are not deleted from table PRPS.
Any deletion Flag should also be checked?
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Jyoti

Hello,
Thanks for reply !
My problem is I am deleting project and WBS Elements from CJ20N but WBS element entries are not deleted from PRPS table.
Why they are appearing in PRPS table and how it can be deleted?
Thanks !

Messages are NOT deleted from tables XI_AF_MSG and XI_AF_MSG_AUDIT

Hello,
I set the retention period to 7 days (1 week)
I also set the default ARCHIVE and DELETE jobs and ALL are working fine.
However, messages with OLD dates are NOT deleted from the tables XI_AF_MSG and XI_AF_MSG_AUDIT.
These tables 32GB in the DBD table space.
I tried to use the URL:
http://<host>:<port>/MessagingSystem/archiving/reorgdb.jsp
BUT to NO avail.
How do I DELETE or ARCHIVE these messages ?
============================================
Here are some more details on the content of the tables (I took into account 1 MONTH retention):
db2 "select count(*) from sapxi3db.XI_AF_MSG_AUDIT where STATUS='SUCC' and TIME_STAMP < '2007-09-10 00:00:00'"
      28947
1 record(s) selected.
db2 "select count(*) from sapxi3db.XI_AF_MSG_AUDIT where STATUS='ERR' and TIME_STAMP < '2007-09-10 00:00:00'"
      13243
1 record(s) selected.
db2 "select count(*) from sapxipdb.XI_AF_MSG where PERSIST_UNTIL < '2007-09-10 00:00:00' and STATUS='NDLV'"
       1048
1 record(s) selected.
db2 "select count(*) from sapxipdb.XI_AF_MSG where PERSIST_UNTIL < '2007-09-10 00:00:00' and STATUS='DLVD'"
          0
1 record(s) selected.

Hi,
First, thank you VERY much for answering.
Now to your questions:
1. When using the URL:
http://<host>:<port>/MessagingSystem/archiving/reorgdb.jsp
    I did NOT get any ERROR messages.
    Thousands of messages where DELETED successfully.
    However, the number of rows in XI_AF_MSG_AUDIT did NOT reduce.
2. I used the default archiving and deletion customizations and jobs.
   However, I ran them manually a few times a day with NO change in the
   number of rows in XI_AF_MSG_AUDIT
   What do you mean by "customized any Archiving for adapter Engine" ?
. In RWB, I do see the default job is running
Have you customized any Archiving for adapter Engine or You are using default arciving which runs every 24 hrs.
3. I did ser the retention period for the adapter engine messages in visual admin in seconds...
Please, advise further.
Kind regards,
Gil

WBS Elements not getting created in ECC Project System from CRM 7.0

Dear all,
We are trying to integrate SAP CRM 7.0 with SAP ECC-PS module. The objective is to bring in the marketing plan and elements data from the CRM system, and to create the corresponding WBS in project system. We have done most of the configuration as recommended by SAP in both the systems, and we see that the BDOCS are getting generated and sent to the ECC system. The following steps have been successfully completed:
1.       Set up the RFC connections between the two systems
2.       Selected the connection type as Middleware in CRM system.
3.       Installed the cProject Add on in CRM box.
4.       Created a project scenario (with project and network profiles) in the PS system and assigned the same in the CRM system.
5.       The Project Scenario in PS config has the same name as the Project Type in CRM config.
6.       Created and released the campaign ids being created in the CRM system.
As already mentioned, we can see that the BDOCS are coming to the ECC system and are getting stored in BDOC_TRACK table. However the issue is that the corresponding WBS elements are not getting generated in the ECC system. Is there anything that that we are missing in the ECC box which would trigger the WBS element creation?
Request you all to share your inputs which would be immensely beneficial for us in achieving this integration.
Thanks and Kind Regards,
Aditya Shrivastava

Hello Aditya,
We too are facing this issue.. if you have resolved the issue could you please let us know the solution ?
Some inputs related to our system,
We have upgrade from CRM 4.0 to CRM 7.0 SP07 and R/3 backend system is on 4.7 SP27, earlier we have completed the upgrade on sandbox without any issues which was upgrade to CRM 7.0 SP04 but with SP07 we are facing the problem of WBS Element not getting created in R/3.
Your help is highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Sumukh Kapoor.

Network No from PRPS table

Dear all,
I need to find the Network No from PROJ table PRPS table.
How can i trace the n/t no from PRPS. If i am using the OBJNR in PRPS and AFKO but its not showing any detail.
Regards.
Sukhveer.

You cannot get the network no. from PRPS tables. Reverse way you can get the same.
PRPS-PSPNR = AUFK-PSPEL Refer this link,
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs;jsessionid=%28J2EE3417200%29ID0862180450DB10151599459437127012End?blog=/pub/wlg/9659
It will be clear for you.. If your network is assigned to WBS in that case only you will get WBS from network no.
With Regards
Nitin P.

Deleting from multiple tables

I have a master table and a detail table. I need to delete a set of records from both the master and detail tables based on a criteria. Now if I delete from one table then I will not know which records I have to delete from the other table. So the records needs to be deleted from both the tables using the criteria. My SQL statement to select the records is
<<
select *
FROM TL_RATE A, TL_RATE_DETAIL B
WHERE A.CARRIER_ID = B.CARRIER_ID
AND A.TARIFF_CLASS_ID = B.TARIFF_CLASS_ID
AND A.LANE_ID = B.LANE_ID
AND A.SERVICE_COM_ID = B.SERVICE_COM_ID
AND A.EFFECTIVE = B.EFFECTIVE
AND DATE_INVALID < SYSDATE-365;
>>
Thanks

You don't show what table DATE_INVALID is in. However, you should just delete the matching rows from the OTHER table first then that table. This is very slightly different from the rows returned by your query since your query is an inner join. In other words, you're excluding rows that might exist in one table but not the other. Assuming DATE_INVALID is in TL_RATE ...
delete tl_rate_detail
where (CARRIER_ID, TARIFF_CLASS_ID, LANE_ID, SERVICE_COM_ID, EFFECTIVE) in (
select CARRIER_ID, TARIFF_CLASS_ID, LANE_ID, SERVICE_COM_ID, EFFECTIVE
from tl_rate
where date_invalid < sysdate - 365)
delete tl_rate
where date_invalid < sysdate - 365
/Richard

Deleting from multiple tables where few tables have same column name

Hi,
I am new to PL/SQL and need some help. I need to delete data older then X years from some 35 odd tables in my schema and out of those tables 25 tables have same column name on which i can have my "where" clause and rest 10 table have different table names. I am doing something like this :
declare
table_list UTL_FILE.FILE_TYPE;
string_line VARCHAR2(1000);
tables_count number:=0;
table_name VARCHAR2(400);
column_name VARCHAR2(400);
BEGIN
table_list := UTL_FILE.FOPEN('ORALOAD','test7.txt','R');
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(table_list);
LOOP
UTL_FILE.GET_LINE(table_list,string_line);
table_name := substr(string_line,1, instr(string_line,'|')-1);
column_name := substr(string_line, instr(string_line,'|')+1);
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(table_name);
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(column_name);
IF column_name = 'SUBMISSION_TIME' THEN
delete from :table_name where to_date(:column_name)<(sysdate-(365*7));
ELSE
delete from || table_name || where ( || to_date(column_name) || ) <(sysdate-(365*7));
END IF;
END LOOP;
EXCEPTION
WHEN NO_DATA_FOUND THEN
UTL_FILE.FCLOSE(table_list);
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Number of Tables processed is : ' || tables_count);
UTL_FILE.FCLOSE(table_list);
END;
WHERE the text file "text7.txt" contains list of table name and column names separated by a pipe line. But when I execute the above proc it gives error "invalid table name".
Can something like this be done or is there any other way to execute this task of deletion from 35 tables.
Thanks.

Thanks for replies. I don't know what I am doing wrong but still not getting this damn thing work...This is the proc i am running now :
declare
table_list UTL_FILE.FILE_TYPE;
string_line VARCHAR2(1000);
tables_count number:=0;
table_name VARCHAR2(4000);
column_name VARCHAR2(4000);
code_text VARCHAR2(2000);
BEGIN
table_list := UTL_FILE.FOPEN('ORALOAD','test7.txt','R');
LOOP
UTL_FILE.GET_LINE(table_list,string_line);
table_name := substr(string_line,1, instr(string_line,'|')-1);
column_name := substr(string_line, instr(string_line,'|')+1);
IF column_name = 'SUBMISSION_TIME' THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('do nothing');
ELSE
code_text:= 'begin delete from'|| (table_name) ||'where to_date' || (column_name) || '<(sysdate-(365*7))';
Execute Immediate code_text;
END IF;
END LOOP;
EXCEPTION
WHEN NO_DATA_FOUND THEN
UTL_FILE.FCLOSE(table_list);
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Number of Tables processed is : ' || tables_count);
UTL_FILE.FCLOSE(table_list);
END;
But it gives following error :
" ORA-06550: line 1, column 51:
PL/SQL: ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
ORA-06550: line 1, column 68:
PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "end-of-file" when expecting one of the following:
ORA-06512: at line 22 "

Persistent messages are not deleted from JMS store

          Hi,
          I'm experiencing some unexperienced JMS store behaviour with WLS 6.1 sp 4. I have
          a servlet that posts a message to persistent JMS queue, which will be eventually
          consumed by an MDB. Even though consumption is successful, the message is not
          deleted from JMS store.
          The message will be redelivered after server restart and is still not deleted
          from JMS store. I verified this using file store and JDBC store. The messages
          actually stay in the JMSSTORE table till doom's day.
          I couldn't reproduce the case with WLS 6.1 sp 3. Exactly the application code
          was used in all cases.
          Subsequently I ran the same case with various ServerDebug DebugJMSXXX-flags set,
          and discovered that WLS 6.1 sp3 logs 'asyncDeleteL' and 'ZZZDelete' for the consumed
          message. WLS 6.1 sp4 didn't log this information.
          I'm running WLS 6.1 on WinNT and Win2000.
          Comments?
          b r
          Juha Räsänen


I've am having exactly this problem with wl 5.1....
          I first saw it with 5.1 sp8....
          In the release notes for 5.1 sp10, the following CR was fixed, which seemed
          like it might have been my problem:
          CR 45915
          Fixed a JMS problem with messages begin left in the queue after received messages had been acknowledged. When a high volume of
          messages was sent to a queue and a consumer retrieved those messages and sent them to another queue, the messages were not being
          removed from the first queue even though they were acknowledged.
          We upgraded to 5.1 sp12, and it appeared that the incidence of that problem was reduced.
          However it still occurs once or twice a week, with 5.1 sp12....
          My situation is a little bit different, in that my consumer retieves a message, and sends another
          message to the SAME queue instead of another queue as described in the CR above...
          It does happen under heavy load, etc....
          Don't know if this has been reported and identified for wl 5.1 sp12 or not...
          It is of course a really difficult to deal with bug....
          Jason
          "Juha Räsänen" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
          >
          > Hi,
          > I'm experiencing some unexperienced JMS store behaviour with WLS 6.1 sp 4. I have
          > a servlet that posts a message to persistent JMS queue, which will be eventually
          > consumed by an MDB. Even though consumption is successful, the message is not
          > deleted from JMS store.
          >
          > The message will be redelivered after server restart and is still not deleted
          > from JMS store. I verified this using file store and JDBC store. The messages
          > actually stay in the JMSSTORE table till doom's day.
          >
          > I couldn't reproduce the case with WLS 6.1 sp 3. Exactly the application code
          > was used in all cases.
          >
          > Subsequently I ran the same case with various ServerDebug DebugJMSXXX-flags set,
          > and discovered that WLS 6.1 sp3 logs 'asyncDeleteL' and 'ZZZDelete' for the consumed
          > message. WLS 6.1 sp4 didn't log this information.
          >
          > I'm running WLS 6.1 on WinNT and Win2000.
          >
          > Comments?
          >
          > b r
          > Juha Räsänen

Delete from internal table

Hi,
I want to delete from internal table some regords.
I write code:
delete isrot where bldat < '01.09.2005'.
it doesn't work, what is wrong?
regards,
Joanna

hi,
you write the statement like....
<b>delete FROM isrot where bldat < '01.09.2005'.</b>
now it will work...
To select the lines that you want to delete using a condition, use the following:
<b>DELETE FROM <target> WHERE <cond> .</b>
All of the lines in the database table that satisfy the conditions in the WHERE clause are deleted. The FROM expression must occur between the keyword and the database table.
You should take particular care when programming the WHERE clause to ensure that you do not delete the wrong lines. For example, if you specify an empty internal table in a dynamic WHERE clause, all of the lines in the table are deleted.
If at least one line is deleted, the system sets SY-SUBRC to 0, otherwise to 4. SY-DBCNT contains the number of lines deleted.
follow this link for more information on internal table operation.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/fc/eb3aef358411d1829f0000e829fbfe/content.htm
regards,
Ashok Reddy
Message was edited by:
Ashok Reddy

Bug report: tranlations not deleted from WWV_FLOW_DYNAMIC_TRANSLATIONS$

Hello, apex team and Joel Kalman.
Bug(?) report: Translations not deleted from WWV_FLOW_DYNAMIC_TRANSLATIONS$ on application replacement with importing from sqlplus using apex_application_install package.
My environment:
Oracle XE 11g Linux 64bit.
Apex 4.1.1.
Development app 110.
Production app 111.
How to reproduce:
Simple way (not checked for 4.1.1):
Export application 110 by using builder or APEXexport.
Import application 110 ten times, then look into dynamic translation. Each translation repeats 10 times.
Checked way to reproduce this bug in in 4.1.1:
Repeat this 10 times to see how dynamic translations is multiplied in app 111.
Export app 110 with bash command:
$ java oracle.apex.APEXExprt -db xxx.private:1521:XE -user apex_040100 -password `cat secret.txt` -applicationid 110 -skipExportDate -expTranslations
Import with this script (as apex_040100 user)
declare
l_workspace_id number;
begin
select workspace_id into l_workspace_id
from apex_workspaces
where workspace = 'PROD';
apex_application_install.set_workspace_id( l_workspace_id );
apex_application_install.set_application_id(111);
apex_application_install.generate_offset;
apex_application_install.set_schema( 'PROD' );
apex_application_install.set_application_alias( 'FPROD_APP' );
end;
@../f110.sql
Workaround:
Run this script before each import:
DELETE FROM apex_040100.WWV_FLOW_DYNAMIC_TRANSLATIONS$
WHERE flow_ID = 111;
If it is not a bug, please, explain me better way to workaround it for me.
Vladimir

Hi Vladimir,
+>> Hello, apex team and Joel Kalman.+
Actually, it's Kallman. But I'm not complaining...I get plenty of emails from within Oracle addressing me as "Joe".
This is definitely a bug. It isn't disastrous, but it's slightly worse than you even presented. I found that if you manually delete an application from within the Application Builder, the dynamic translations remain as well. They could potentially be orphaned forever.
Your workaround, while not recommended to directly manipulate the APEX schema, would clear up the excess data. Also, a way to reduce the effects of this problem is simply to set the offset to what was initially generated the first time you imported application 110 as 111.
I didn't write this logic, but I'll fix it. There isn't a FK on this table and I believe there should be.
Bug 13801751 is filed, to be fixed for APEX 4.2.
Thanks for reporting this.
Joel

Create Trigger to Delete from multiple tables

Hello:
I'm trying to write a trigger which will allow me to delete from multiple records. I have two tables where the record for the same client_id needs to be deleted.
Is it possible to do this? I started writing some code and this is what I have so far:
create or replace trigger app_t1
before delete on <table1> ?? -
for each row
begin
delete from client where clientid = :new.clientid;
delete from key where pk = :newclientid;
end;I'm stuck on the line where I have "before delete on" where I'm supposed to provide a table name. I can only use one table and I need to delete from two.
This trigger is supposed to be used within APEX. In APEX, fields are designated as :P1_clientid where P1 references page 1 of the application. Yet, :P1_clientid is set to the field clientid in the table.
So when I write my trigger, I'm not sure how I'm supposed to set my variables.
Can someone help?
I'm also going to post this into the APEX forum.
Thanks.

It's not clear to me if you are just trying to keep two tables in syn or whether you are trying to achieve something else.
A couple of points though:
- In delete database triggers the :new attributes are NULL. You probably mean to use the :old attributes.
- Is there some relationship between the two tables? If so, setting the foreign key to CASCADE DELETE might do the trick for you.
- Another option - better than a database trigger in my opinion - is to just code a procedure that deletes from both tables and call that one from APEX.
Regards,
Rob.

Delete from two tables in one statement

Hi,
Is there a way to delete from two tables in one statement?
Actually I have two tables:
1. Base table (id, name, age)
2. Person table (id, city, street)
The id in both tables is identical.
I would like to delete using something like a join:
Delete from base, person where id=2;
Thanks
dyahav

Hi,
If you want to delete records both at a time them your table must use ON DELETE CASCADE. See the below example.
CREATE TABLE supplier
( supplier_id numeric(10) not null,
supplier_name varchar2(50) not null,
contact_name varchar2(50),
CONSTRAINT supplier_pk PRIMARY KEY (supplier_id)
CREATE TABLE products
( product_id numeric(10) not null,
supplier_id numeric(10) not null,
CONSTRAINT fk_supplier
FOREIGN KEY (supplier_id)
REFERENCES supplier(supplier_id)
ON DELETE CASCADE
In this example, we've created a primary key on the supplier table called supplier_pk. It consists of only one field - the supplier_id field. Then we've created a foreign key called fk_supplier on the products table that references the supplier table based on the supplier_id field.
Because of the cascade delete, when a record in the supplier table is deleted, all records in the products table will also be deleted that have the same supplier_id value.
Thank you.

Condition Record PB00 gets deleted from A018 table

Hi Gurus-
Could anyone of you explain how the PB00 condition is getting deleted from A018 table (Purch Org Level Condition)? It looks like some batch job is randomly setting the Valid to Date A018-DATBI to yesterday's date and today there is no valid time dependent condition.
I don't know any process/program that accesses PB00 condition in table A018 other than MEK1 or MEK4.
Does SD condition type change has any impact in Purchasing Price (PB00). Although all the Rate/Price is stored in the same table KONP but separated by application area and table (A017, A018, A071, A073).
Can anybody shed some lights on this please?

Thanks for your reply. We know the user name who is making the change in A018. It is a batch user ID that makes the change but we have about 100 differentg background batch job that is scheduled everyday and I went through every one of them but did not raise any flag.
And the worst part is since it is done by the batch user id (batch job), there is no change record (if I try to do MEK3-Environment>display changes) not even an entry in CDHDR table or CDPOS table.
Trying to see if you guys know of any SD or MM program that accesses that table and set the valid to field to yesterdays date and create a new condition record (KNUMH) with valid to date 31.12.9999 and rate (value) to 0.00?
Please let me know if you have any suggestion.
Thanks in advance.

WBS elements not deleted from PRPS table

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for