We encountered a problem with some client machines that use Firefox version 24ESR and IE8. Ajax requests of aspx pages from Firefox are getting the following er

I encountered a problem with some client machines that use Firefox version 24ESR and IE8.
Ajax requests of aspx pages from Firefox are getting the following error from the iis server (iis version 7.5):
Bad Request - Request Too Long
HTTP Error 400. The size of the request headers is too long.
From analyzing the request that was sent to the server, I saw that the request consist of only the viewstate of the aspx page.
I tried to disable the viewstate for one page and the server got the request correctly.
I do not encounter any issues on these laptops with postback requests from Firefox or when running the same application with IE8.

Sometimes that means that the page address sent is loo long.
Check the link address you are using.
I can't help you further and will send for more help.

Similar Messages

HT4641 Hello there i am using the latest version of pages but when I imported a word do.ument with some figures ( mainly pictures, X-rays, CT scans, and ECG ) I could not find them they all vanishes although the text was perfectly displayed . Can anybody

Hello there i am using the latest version of pages on ipad3 but when I imported a word doument with some figures ( mainly pictures, X-rays, CT scans, and ECG ) I could not find them they all vanishes although the text was perfectly displayed . Can anyone help.
Thanks

Thank you very much!
I cant believe this little comment has been so helpful!
But yes it is:
I explain, despite my efforts to find, googled it, forums, faqs, etc...
no where it mentionned the manifest.fm file is... INSIDE the .jar!
Your comment "a zip" made me attempt to open it with winrar, and I found a manifest.fm file inside!
So far I was editing the one at the "source" of my project and rebuilding it with netbeans.
I am going to try that now.
Actually.... :( no its mentionning my main class!
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.7.0
Created-By: 10.0-b19 (Sun Microsystems Inc.)
Main-class: courseworkjava3d.Simple3D
Class-Path:
X-COMMENT: Main-Class will be added automatically by buildWell I have no problems uploading you the .jar, it is for a coursework it is not a private project or whatever:
http://www.uploading.com/files/CM2LKWYU/BetaCourseworkJava3d_Final.jar.html
Oh and I felt on your comment "dont ask us" as if I was suppose to know... i'm a beginner, I did not know that! And I tried to give you so many infos so you dont lose your time if you want to help, especially as after my own research I found many, many results for this "main class" and I tried a few solutions!
Edited by: CupofTea on Apr 13, 2008 3:28 AM

HT3275 Since updating OS to Mountain Lion from leopard, I get the following error message when trying to backup with time machine on external drive. Could not complete backup to media share. The network backup disk does not support the required AFP feat

Since updating OS to Mountain Lion from leopard, I get the following error message when trying to backup with time machine on external drive. "Could not complete backup to media share. The network backup disk does not support the required AFP features." What are AFP features and how do I get Time Machine to backup to my current external backup?

This means that your NAS does not support the required encryption. Update your NAS to the latest firmware or ditch it and buy a Time Capsule (they are the most reliable when using TM).

When I try to download books I purchased from Kobo I get the following error message: Error getting License. License Server Communication Problem: E IO CANNOT OPEN

When I try to download books I purchased from Kobo I get the following error message: Error getting License. License Server Communication Problem: E IO CANNOT OPEN.
I've spent hundred of dollars on books that I can't get access to! How can I fix this?

I've been having the same issue! I've tried uninstalling and reinstalling ADE but that hasn't helped; I've even created a new Adobe ID and that was also a fruitless venture. I haven't yet tried to unauothorize my device, but I am hesitant to do so as it seems that others have tried and have not succeeded. I am desperately caught in the middle of a series and I would love to have access to the new books that I've been trying to download from my library!

Strange problem with some specific games (that should be compatible)

Hello everyone.
Got myself an Iphone 4 on day one: it's my first apple product and I'm really happy with it (I'm comming from the windows mobile world/****).
But I soon discovered a strange compatibility problem that only happens with some games, even after they got ios4 updates (and those games are working on friends iphones 4).
I thought it could be a software issue so I tried to restore my phone, then re-sync it, but still having the same issues
Problematic games are Worms, Chaos rings, Texting of the bread and Cro-Mag Rally.
When launching Worms, only a quarter of the screen shows up, with messy graphics.
For the other 3, I can enter menus, everything seems fine until the actual game launches, wich gives me the same results as the one described for T17's Worms: only a small portion of the screen shows up, flikering with messy pixeled graphics.
I'm starting to wonder if this could be a hardware issue, even though tones of games are working perfectly (including 3d heavy ones like Epic citadel or Archetype)
Any help would be greatly apreciated!

Sounds like those games are corrupted. Delete them on your phone, then delete them in itunes, when prompted, move all files to trash, empty your trash. Then sync your phone to insure that all traces are removed from your phone. Then re-download them in itunes(you can re-download purchased apps for free), sync them back to your phone. See if this fixes things.

Problems with some web parts when using XSLT

I have a page on which I have several web parts. Some web parts are custom while others are OOB and only XSLT is applied on them.
I am using 2 WFEs with NLB. Problem is when I do iisreset on one of the WFE then the OOB web parts with XSLT start giving error. You know the standard error "corelation ID....bla bla bla". Anyway the error automatically goes away after a 2, 3 minutes.
So basically if I do iisreset or stop the iis, and then load that page, then all custom web parts load fine except those OOB web parts with XSLT. And then they too start working fine after 2, 3 minutes if I reload page.
What could be the reason for that? Looks like some service on which XSLT depends take time to load!? And once that service is loaded then they start working fine? Or it could be due to distributed cache or something!?

Hi Frank,
Which version of the SharePoint 2010 did you use?
In June 2011 CU code was added to the DataFormWebPart (which is used to display list data) that if an XSLT transform took longer than 5 seconds, a StackOverflowException was thrown. This was done to avoid
a potential Denial Of Service attack on SharePoint if crafted XML could be sent that would continually clog up the XSLT, thereby stopping pages from rendering.
In August 2011 CU the transform "timeout" was reduced from 5 seconds to 1.
So, any list with XSLT that takes longer than 1 second to parse in an XSLT transform goes *boom*.
After you perform an IIS reset , the cache of the page was cleared and you encountered the error. Once the page is cached, there is no error.
You can try to set up XSLT Timeout with the following PS commands:
$farm = Get-SPFarm
$farm.XsltTransformTimeOut = 5
$farm.Update()
Reference:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/de-DE/44cfd798-be7a-4436-8786-bd44049e7def/sp2010-column-filter-causing-unable-to-display-web-part-error-and-a-stack-overflow-exception?forum=sharepointgeneralprevious
Best Regards,
Eric
Eric Tao
TechNet Community Support

2 days ago I started having problems with some web sites that previously worked fine. They still work fine on other browsers. What happened & can you fix it?

On the Times newspaper site I was using December 19 some of the features stopped working. Has Firefox made an update? I tried downloading Firefox 9.0 but the problems persist. At the end of the news articles is a comments section but this no longer displays in Firefox. There is a SuDoku feature in the Puzzles section which is no longer accessible by Firefox.

Reload web page(s) and bypass the cache.
*Press and hold Shift and left-click the Reload button.
*Press "Ctrl + F5" or press "Ctrl + Shift + R" (Windows,Linux)
*Press "Cmd + Shift + R" (MAC)
Clear the cache and the cookies from sites that cause problems.
"Clear the Cache":
*Tools > Options > Advanced > Network > Offline Storage (Cache): "Clear Now"
"Remove Cookies" from sites causing problems:
*Tools > Options > Privacy > Cookies: "Show Cookies"
Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions or if hardware acceleration is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox (Tools) > Add-ons > Appearance/Themes).
*Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
*https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Safe+Mode

Every time I try to install itunes on my PC I get the following message, and I can't seem to find a solution. Any help out there?? "There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. A program required for this install to complete could not be run."

Every time I try to install itunes on my PC I get the following message, and I can't seem to find a solution. Any help out there?? "There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. A program required for this install to complete could not be run."

Try the following user tip:
"There is a problem with this Windows Installer package ..." error messages when installing iTunes for Windows

Group Policy not work in some client machine.

Hello All,
Existing environment is AD 2012. gpupdate /force command does not working in some client machine. And it's occur randomly. Error shown about 15-20% of client machine. Please suggest. Hopefully this time get reply from community.
The Error:
User policy could not be updated successfully. The following errors were encount
ered:
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows attempted to read the file \\example.net\sysvol\example.net\Policies\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB
984F9}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and was not successful. Group Policy set
tings may not be applied until this event is resolved. This issue may be transie
nt and could be caused by one or more of the following:
a) Name Resolution/Network Connectivity to the current domain controller.
b) File Replication Service Latency (a file created on another domain controller
has not replicated to the current domain controller).
c) The Distributed File System (DFS) client has been disabled.
Computer policy could not be updated successfully. The following errors were enc
ountered:
The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows attempted to read the file \\example.net\sysvol\example.net\Policies\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB
984F9}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and was not successful. Group Policy set
tings may not be applied until this event is resolved. This issue may be transie
nt and could be caused by one or more of the following:
a) Name Resolution/Network Connectivity to the current domain controller.

Thanks for your reply. basically this error occurs with in same location as well as branch location. i have check event log in AD but not got any specific error. AD health status is ok. AD to AD synchronization also working well. All the client machine running
on windows 7 64 bit and few of them are windows 8.
Please suggest. if you need any event log for analysis i can send you.
Thanks
I recommend you examine the event logs upon an affected client machine. Specifically, look for the surrounding events on that machine (both System, and Application logs), for the hours previous and the hour after.
The time period may vary according to your environment (e.g. what is expected/normal for your environment, your configured GP refresh cycle-time).
e.g., are there network drops, or power drops, or system crashes, restarts at the similar time.
if it's a laptop, is it wireless? Was there a transition from wireless to wired operation?
Is there VPN in use?
If you are able to compare with another machine (I would encourage that), to understand what "normal" looks like in the logs, so that you have some kind of baseline data for comparison.
Other checks, maybe confirm that the machines are updating as required (have the relevant WindowsUpdates etc), and consider if some security/protection/firewall software might be interfering with normal Windows operations.
Also the potential for malware or virus, which can disturb many basic services (ensure a scan is performed and returns clean).
If you have the opportunity for an affected user to contact you urgently when the symptom occurs, check that the gpt.ini file is accessible from their PC.
e.g.: \\example.net\sysvol\example.net\Policies\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB
984F9}\gpt.ini
This file is hosted within the replicated SYSVOL share on your DC's, so check that it is accessible.
You might also validate the particular GPO this refers to, and check each of your DC's holds the correct copy of the files for that GPO GUID.
If you open that GPO, and perform a minor change to it (e.g. add a comment), then click Apply, OK, this should cause the GPO contents to replicate an updated version (be cautious, depending upon the nature of that GPO !!!)
Don
(Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognises useful contributions. Thanks!)

Photoshop has encountered a problem with the display driver

I rummaged around in here looking at opengl topics and others associated with the above error, but I'm not seeing what I'm encountering (or I am and I don't recognize it!).....
I bought CS4 a week or so ago, and installed it on a system running XP32 with service pack 3, 4GB of ram withe the /3GB switch set, nVidia 8600 GT card (which according to the list is supported), and multiple spindles for images, scratch, applications, and so on. I found other topics earlier so I downloaded the most recent drivers for my video card.
I'm not crashing and burning, but I'm getting some messages...
I opened an image, and while working on it I wanted to do a transform/warp. I got the message that Photoshop couldn't perform the operation because there wasn't enough memory. It didn't crash but I had to shut down CS4 and restart it to do the warp.
Most recently I opened a couple images for a panorama, and while doing the merge I got the message that "Photoshop has encountered a problem with the display driver and has temporarily disabled gpu enhancements." It tells me to check for the latest drivers - I've ALREADY got the lastest drivers. Again, no crash, just the warning. It completed the panorama.
There have been a couple other occurrences of messages of this type, so I'm curious if there's some set of preferences or system settting I need to adjust to optimize things? I've alrady adjusted the nVidia settings because I also run Lightroom and they're having problems too.
I've read the tech notes for the video and such and didn't find any set of optimizations there so is there a set of adjustments beyond the preferences that needs to be adjusted to improve memory and video performance? And if so, can someone point me to them.

As I understand it (suspect at best) XP32 can address 4 gig of memory. the /3gb switch lets the applications get at 3 gig of that. If my video card takes the first 256MB, and XP is guaranteed the other 750 of the 1st gig, and in the CS4 performance preferences I should be giving it from 1462 - 1895 MB (I've given it around 1890), that leaves me with another gig or so... Is that limited to applications or can XP use it? In any case, I'm not crashing, I just get the message every so often about being out of memory. I don't recall ever seeing this with CS3, but new version, new oddities...

Cisco Prime 2.1 problem with API/Client

Hi,
im having a problem with the API output i get from Cisco Prime Infrastructure. The URL im trying to GET info from is:
https://<URL>/webacs/api/v1/data/Clients
The output shows that im missing data from a specific ID. Example:
{"@url":"https:\/\/prime.lmv.lm.se\/webacs\/api\/v1\/data\/Clients\/1280389614","@type":"Clients","$":"1280389614"}
Then i try to GET the info regarding this ID: https://<URL>/webacs/api/v1/data/Clients/1280389614
{"errorDocument":{"httpResponseCode":500,"httpMethod":"GET","message":"No such entity as Clients \/ 1280389614.-PRS-101","id":"presentation.PRS-101","uriPath":"data\/Clients\/1280389614","queryParams":"{}"}}
So something is wrong here, so when i add ".full=true" parameter i get the following error as it cannot show the client data:
https://<URL>/webacs/api/v1/data/Clients.json?.full=true&.firstResult=1000&.maxResults=1000
{"errorDocument":{"httpResponseCode":500,"httpMethod":"GET","message":"Exception while invoking valueOf method 'getEnum' of enumeration class 'class com.cisco.ncs.nbi.client.ClientProtocolEnum'; nested exception is org.hibernate.HibernateException: Exception while invoking valueOf method 'getEnum' of enumeration class 'class com.cisco.ncs.nbi.client.ClientProtocolEnum'","exception":"org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateSystemException: Exception while invoking valueOf method 'getEnum' of enumeration class 'class com.cisco.ncs.nbi.client.ClientProtocolEnum'; nested exception is org.hibernate.HibernateException: Exception while invoking valueOf method 'getEnum' of enumeration class 'class com.cisco.ncs.nbi.client.ClientProtocolEnum'","uriPath":"data\/Clients","queryParams":"{.full=[true], .firstResult=[1000], .maxResults=[1000]}"}}
Any idea how to solve this issue, how can i find the client that is causing this problem? In my script im reading all the clients in the network to a third party application. But right now its hard to get this output in a smart way. It might be resolved in 2.2, but it feels like the data i corrupt in some way so i doubt that this error is related to the version?
Best Regards // Mattias Andersson

Hi,
I have also run into this problem on two different Prime 2.1-systems when trying to get all Client-data available. I haven't figured out a way to fix it more than making small calls (.maxResults=100) then trying to pin-point and skip the ID giving the error. I've been using 2.2 for a while now but haven't tested the Client-API that much yet. I'll experiment some more on it and see if I can recreate the problem to see if it's related to the version.

Adobe presenter has encountered a problem with this presentation

I dont know what happened but I used Adobe presenter without issue on Friday, 9/21. On Monday 9/24 it seems there is an issue. When I try to save a powerpoint presentation or use the Presenter ribben I am seeing the same message, Adobe presenter has encountered a problem with this presentation.....
I have unistalled and reinstalled Presenter as well as unistalled and reinstalled Powerpoint. Nothing is working and the error message does not help. This is also happenign on my coworkers machine.
Does anyone have any suggestions?

Hi,
Can you tell us the exact version of Presenter please. You will find it in About Dialog as mentioned in above post.
I did not get your previous post. Do you mean you have installed an incorrect version (32/64bit) ? Presenter 32bit is supported on PowerPoint32bit and Presenter 64bit version on PowerPoint 64bit.
Please ensure you are following the above criteria.
Let us know if you need help in identifying it.
Regards,
Mukul

Backup Error - 0x810000E4 Windows Backup has encountered a problem with the backup catalog

Dear all,
I'm trying to backup my files onto a 2TB big external USB disk. My computer is Dell Latitude E4300.
When I run the backup, it runs normally but ends with this error:
0x810000E4 Windows Backup has encountered a problem with the backup catalog
When checking the zip files on the USB drive, it seems that only some of the files have been backed up. The same confirms the restore option when I browse the files in the backup.
When I start the backup again, it continues - i.e. acknowledges the files already there and backs up a additional files but again fails after some time.
Any ideas please.
Thank you,
Tomas

Hello Tomas,
This is not expected.
Could you please collect the backup failure traces from %windir%\Logs\WindowsBackup and send them to my mail-id -
[email protected] (pl. remove -nospam phrase from the id to get the correct one).
Thanks,
Sriram [MSFT]
Sriram [MSFT]

Problems with QuickVPN client

Hello,
I experiance problems with QuickVPN client (version 1.4.1.2). I'm trying to connect to router SA520 with 1.1.65 firmware,
vpn tunell is established, but client says "The remote gateway is not responding. Do you want to wait?"
in case i click no, it drops vpn tunell
QuickVPN client log looks like this:
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]OS Version: Windows 7
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]Windows Firewall Domain Profile Settings: ON
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]Windows Firewall Private Profile Settings: ON
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]Windows Firewall Private Profile Settings: ON
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]One network interface detected with IP address 192.168.1.100
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]Connecting...
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [DEBUG]Input VPN Server Address = vpn.in-volv.lv
2010/08/18 12:13:28 [STATUS]Connecting to remote gateway with IP address: 78.28.223.10
2010/08/18 12:13:28 [WARNING]Server's certificate doesn't exist on your local computer.
2010/08/18 12:13:30 [STATUS]Remote gateway was reached by https ...
2010/08/18 12:13:30 [STATUS]Provisioning...
2010/08/18 12:13:39 [STATUS]Success to connect.
2010/08/18 12:13:39 [STATUS]Tunnel is configured. Ping test is about to start.
2010/08/18 12:13:39 [STATUS]Verifying Network...
2010/08/18 12:13:44 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
2010/08/18 12:13:47 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
2010/08/18 12:13:50 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
2010/08/18 12:13:53 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
2010/08/18 12:13:56 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
2010/08/18 12:14:08 [WARNING]Ping was blocked, which can be caused by an unexpected disconnect.
2010/08/18 12:14:12 [STATUS]Disconnecting...
2010/08/18 12:14:15 [STATUS]Success to disconnect.
Server logs look like this:
2010-08-18 12:28:49: INFO: Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "arvils"
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Configuration found for 83.243.93.200[500].
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 78.28.223.10[500]<=>83.243.93.200[500]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: For 83.243.93.200[500], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: NAT-D payload matches for 78.28.223.10[500]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 83.243.93.200[500]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: NAT detected: PEER
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer 83.243.93.200[4500]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 78.28.223.10[4500]-83.243.93.200[4500] with spi:e2cd855a75fc0887:6dc3b2e025152444
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 78.28.223.10[0]<=>83.243.93.200[0]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 192.168.75.0/24<->192.168.1.100/32
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 3(3)->Tunnel(1)
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 83.243.93.200->78.28.223.10 with spi=47693803(0x2d7bfeb)
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 78.28.223.10->83.243.93.200 with spi=1079189482(0x40531fea)
2010-08-18 12:35:57: INFO: an undead schedule has been deleted: 'pk_recvupdate'.
2010-08-18 12:35:57: INFO: Purged IPsec-SA with proto_id=ESP and spi=1079189482(0x40531fea).
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Configuration found for 83.243.93.200[500].
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 78.28.223.10[500]<=>83.243.93.200[500]
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: For 83.243.93.200[500], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: NAT-D payload matches for 78.28.223.10[500]
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 83.243.93.200[500]
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: NAT detected: PEER
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer 83.243.93.200[4500]
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 78.28.223.10[4500]-83.243.93.200[4500] with spi:28447d39874689f9:a2b7da19d8d86413
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 78.28.223.10[0]<=>83.243.93.200[0]
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 192.168.75.0/24<->192.168.1.100/32
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 3(3)->Tunnel(1)
2010-08-18 12:40:47: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 83.243.93.200->78.28.223.10 with spi=259246202(0xf73c87a)
2010-08-18 12:40:47: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 78.28.223.10->83.243.93.200 with spi=3642234214(0xd9181566)
2010-08-18 12:43:27: INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 83.243.93.200->78.28.223.10 with spi=33356156(0x1fcf97c)
2010-08-18 12:45:47: INFO: an undead schedule has been deleted: 'pk_recvupdate'.
2010-08-18 12:45:47: INFO: Purged IPsec-SA with proto_id=ESP and spi=3642234214(0xd9181566).
The most interesting thing is that sometimes this message appears, sometimes not (with the same configuration).
Please help!

Hi,
I have some problem. I am using Windows 7 Entreprice x64. I use SA520 Firmware 1.1.65 and QuickVPN 1.4.1.2 port 60443.
"The remote gateway is not responding. Do you want to wait"
2010-08-18 17:25:51: INFO: Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "username"
2010-08-18 17:25:51: INFO: Adding IKE configuration with identifer "username"
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Configuration found for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235].
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 172.22.5.10[500]<=>xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: For xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 172.22.5.10[500]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:ed4f291c71c1b688:7e6a8a0968f878fb
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 172.22.5.10[0]<=> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[0]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 192.168.75.0/24<->192.168.170.224/32
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 3(3)->Tunnel(1)
2010-08-18 17:26:05: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 48540->4500]: ESP/Tunnel xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx->172.22.5.10 with spi=239099274(0xe405d8a)
2010-08-18 17:26:05: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->48540]: ESP/Tunnel 172.22.5.10-> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx with spi=3886848189(0xe7ac98bd)
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Configuration found for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235].
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 172.22.5.10[500]<=> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: For xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 172.22.5.10[500]
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540]
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:699f34b434d4318c:df4adca414787d36
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=699f34b434d4318c:df4adca414787d36.
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Configuration found for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235].
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 172.22.5.10[500]<=> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: For xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 172.22.5.10[500]
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2010-08-18 17:27:15: INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:699f34b434d4318c:df4adca414787d36
2010-08-18 17:27:15: INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540]
2010-08-18 17:27:15: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:3fe5eb0bddbf2b9a:f5c11d7f813ca74a
2010-08-18 17:27:15: INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2010-08-18 17:28:20: INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=3fe5eb0bddbf2b9a:f5c11d7f813ca74a.
2010-08-18 17:28:21: INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:3fe5eb0bddbf2b9a:f5c11d7f813ca74a
With windows XP Pro i dont have this problem.
Is there a detailed configuration guide?
10x

Problem with Outlook (client) 2010/2013 profiles on Exchange 2013

We have recently started migrating to Exchange 2013 and have come across a problem with some of our accounts. This problem exists in both migrated mailboxes and natively created 2013 mailboxes.
basically we have a lot of "shared" accounts. We create a user object in AD, give it a mailbox, then give a security group "Full Access" (and often "send-as") permissions on the account. We then Disable the
account in AD (to prevent directly using the password) and then add/remove group members to manage access. everyone uses their own credentials to get to the account.
For the most part this works fine. Users can access OWA and get to these shared mailboxes, they can also 'add' the mailbox to their Outlook client by going into Account Settings->Properties of the Exchange user->More Settings... ->Advanced Tab->"Open
these additional mailboxes:" and adding the mailbox.
However what has happened is that some users were setting up a separate profile instead of adding a mailbox. (Pretty much these
instructions: )
When this is done an error occurs. :
Cannot open your default e-mail folders. You must connect to Microsoft Exchange with the current profile before you can synchronize your folders with your Outlook data file (.ost).
Connecting with a profile set up as yourself first does not clear the error, whenever the shared mailbox folder is selected you get this. The exception is if you go into the account properties and turn off Cached mode. the error then becomes:
Cannot open your default e-mail folders. the file c:\users\[user]\appdata\local\microsoft\outlook\[datafile].ost is not an Outlook datafile (.ost).
Which is weird since migrated accounts had working OST files which were functional prior to migration and outlook creates the new OST for new accounts. This message appears to be a red herring and the problem is still sync access but it throws this
error instead.
In the end is creating a new profile for a mailbox you have Full Access to no longer supported in 2013 or is there something we can do to fix this problem?

Hi AD-Tester,
According to your description and I do an test, however I cannot reproduce the problem.
I want to confirm some points, please help to collect answers for following questions:
1. Check all account or some special user face this problem.
2. Try this command to check Atodiscover, Exchange Web services, Availability service, Offline Address Book services works well:
Get-ClientAccessServer | Test-OutlookWebServices -Identity 'e-mail address'
If it works on OWA, problem may point to outlook client. Please try to re-create a outlook profile for testing.
Note: please make sure set properly setting for Outlook anywhere.
Additional, we can recreate an account and enable-mailbox, then disable in AD and try to login outlook account again.
Best Regards,
Allen Wang

We encountered a problem with some client machines that use Firefox version 24ESR and IE8. Ajax requests of aspx pages from Firefox are getting the following er

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for