Web Gallery function in CS2

hello - I am using CS2 and when I make a web gallery from the automate task feature, the gallery comes out great but the controls are too far to the right of the page. Is there anyway to make those controls appear just under the gallery?
thanks

Missing DOCTYPE declaration for starters:
http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_doctype.asp
without that the browsers do not know which set of rules to apply when displaying the page. Correct that then...
Validate the page here:
http://validator.w3.org/
Then come back here and we will look for problems. But very hard to correct anything until you get the foundation right.
Best of luck,
Adninjastrator

Similar Messages

Question about the "Create Web Gallery" function in Bridge

I created a beautiful Web Gallery using Bridge's built-in function which creates a Photoshop Web Gallery.
Everything works great except for one thing. When I click the "E-Mail Feedback" button, Apple Mail loads and creates blank e-mail message. This is all good, but for some reason the address line is loading up with data instead of just an e-mail address. I was hoping someone versed in html could tell me what I'm doing. The source code in ThumbnailFrame.html looks like this:
function sendFeedback(picName) {
checkForUnSavedChanges(picName);
var prefix = "mailto:[email protected]";
var name = null;
name = prompt("Enter Your Name:", "Your Name");
if (name) {
prefix += "subject=" + escape("Feedback from " + name);
prefix += "&body=";
var str = ""
for (var i in feedback) {
str += i + " ~~ \n";
str += (feedback[i].approved == true) ? "Approved ~~ \n" : "";
str += (feedback[i].other == true) ? "Other ~~ \n" : "";
str += (feedback[i].comments != "") ? ("\nComments:\n" + feedback[i].comments + " ~~ \n") : "";
str += "____________________________________________\n\n";
The address line in the Apple Mail message looks like this: [email protected]=Feedback from Paul Kirtley&body=
I want it to look like this: [email protected]
By looking at the source code above, can someone tell me how I can make an adjustment to keep "subject=Feedback from Paul Kirtley&body=" out of the address line?
Thanks!

There are update and insert methods under the "core" section/
See this image : http://www.oracle.com/technology/obe/obe1013jdev/10131/10131_ejb_30/images/b20105.gif
You might want to follow this tutorial to see how it works:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/obe/obe1013jdev/10131/10131_ejb_30/ejb_30.htm#t4

Flash (Photoshop) Web Gallery data

I have created a web gallery using Photoshop CS2 to allow my
clients to proof their images. From this gallery I want to allow
them to flag images they like then submit the selections to me via
email. Currently they are using the gallery just to view the
images. There is not a way to mark the images or to submit them via
email. The clients have to manually write down the file names, type
and email, and send it to me.
1. Can the function of selection boxes be added to the web
gallery? I do not own the full flash program.
2. Can the file names for the selected images be put into an
email to me using a submit button?
How are both of these task performed?
Thanks

1) Yes it can but you will need to modify the flash movie so
*someone* will need to know how to change the flash movie.
2) Yes this is possible but you'll either need your flash
movie to talk to the server and have the server send the email or
figure out how to get Flash to use the client's mail program. They
may or may not have one installed. Here's a tutorial for the second
option:
http://www.tizag.com/flashTutorial/flashemailform.php

Photos in Web gallery too dark

Hello,
I just updated to the new iLife.
I tried the new Web Gallery function and the photos are too dark compared to the view in iPhoto.
Same happens with galleries in iWeb.
What's wrong?
JO

There is a color problem when publishing pictures from iPhoto 06 and 08 (as well as when e-mailing a picture).
The problem being that the images are published with their original color profile, whatever that is. Further, if profile is missing in the image in iPhoto, the profile will be missing in the output. (BUT iPhoto displays correctly in case there is an EXIF tag specifying sRGB).
The result is that colors will not be displayed correctly on the WEB (or in e-mail clients), more or less depending on OS platform. This applies both to images and their thumbnails.
Compare the iPhoto album http://www.tomasjonsson.eu/IPhotoTests/
with an album with correct colors http://www.tomasjonsson.eu/PictureSite/Albums/Pages/PreAndPostProcessed.html
In Safari, only IMG_9465 and IMG_5182 will show a difference - since those are the only images without a color profile. However, in other MS-Windows browsers, most images will be displayed incorrectly.
Note! Most digital cameras produce images without at color profile but with an EXIF tag. In iPhoto:Preferences:Advanced choose Embed ColorSync profile, which will add a profile corresponding the EXIF tag. However, the images that you have already imported will not be fixed.
Note to Apple: Show EXIF colors space and embedded color profile in Info pane. Add command - ASSIGN profile. And in export dialog - add option Color Space.
HOW IT SHOULD BE
Images on the web (and in general also e-mails) should be published in sRGB color space (otherwise they will not be displayed correctly in browsers on the MS-Windows platforms, with the exception of Safari, viewing images with a color profile)
Images should have a color profile, in particular the sRGB images (otherwise they will not be displayed correctly on the MacOS platforms. Maybe close to correct if you have calibrated your monitor to PC-gamma)
Actually all images should have a color profile, period. If the image does not have a color profile, it is just a pile of randomly colored pixels - to be interpreted freely by any displaying device, which they do.
For a demonstration of profiles and WEB see: http://www.gballard.net/psd/golive_pageprofile/embeddedJPEGprofiles.html
However, DO NOT follow this guys advice of omitting the color profile for WEB publishing because of overhead. The overhead is less than 1% of a high quality image. (I measured 0.5 - 2.5 kByte)
WORKAROUND
After exporting from iPhoto - use Photoshop and CONVERT TO PROFILE all images to sRGB color space. Save file with color profile.
Note, make sure that images without original profile are treated correctly (most often they are sRGB, check the EXIF tag with Preview application)
Note, apply also conversion to thumbnails.
Tomas Jonsson, Genicore Embedded Technology AB

Web gallery built in Bridge, then linked from DW site, doesn't work

Hi,
Using the "web gallery" function in Adobe Bridge CS5, I created an HTML-based web gallery and uploaded it directly from Bridge to here on the web:
http://www.sws-steel.com/test2/SouthwestSteel/
I can view this in Safari 5.0.5 on my Mac, but it's a blank white page in Firefox and in Chrome. Even worse, my client gets a blank page in every Windows-based browser.
If I can get it to work at all, my intent is to add it within a frame on this page:
http://www.sws-steel.com/temp/photos.html
Again, it seems to work in Safari (but only after a refresh on an iPad), but doesn't work anywhere else.
The web gallery function in Bridge would be ideal to use for this gallery, but it just doesn't work and I have no idea how to fix it. Any help or insights on what's wrong would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Kent Bingham

Missing DOCTYPE declaration for starters:
http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_doctype.asp
without that the browsers do not know which set of rules to apply when displaying the page. Correct that then...
Validate the page here:
http://validator.w3.org/
Then come back here and we will look for problems. But very hard to correct anything until you get the foundation right.
Best of luck,
Adninjastrator

Web Gallery in Bridge CS4 not working

I've just started using the Web Gallery function in Bridge CS4. The output previews just fine, and loads perfectly from local disk in my browser. When I upload to my webspace, I get just a blank page.
I have contacted my ISP, who say that the problem lies with the Index.html file. They have run it through a validator at W3.org, and it comes back with multiple errors. i have no idea how to fix these errors, and in any case can't understand why it loads just fine from my hard drive, but not from my webspace.
Has anyone here had a similar issue?
Thanks

Yeah, and I don't see a 'show file names' box on the templates I've looked at.
What I did was go into the group.xml file and I could find the TITLE tags and changed those to what I wanted for my caption.
Still seems somethings not right, since I had to manually add them.

Web gallery - disabled - my fault?

When I select 'Output' in Bridge CS4 nothing happens the right hand panel which, on my other system changes to Output, remains unchanged from whatever it was already set to. Now I must admit I made a change when first installing CS4. From the Goodies folder I installed several plugins one of which I thought was the Web Gallery plugin and did the following:<br />1. Install the Web Photo Gallery plug-in.<br />2. From the Photoshop CS4 install disc, drop the //<language>/Goodies/Presets/Scripts/Layer Comps To WPG.jsx file into the //Adobe Photoshop CS4/Presets/Scripts folder and overwrite the existing Layer Comps To WPG.jsx.<br />As I didn't do this on my laptop where the web gallery functions normally, have I somehow prevented it from working and how do I rectify it. Thanks, NeilC

That looks strange. What you seen in the 'C:\Documents and Settings\[useraccount]\Application Data\Adobe\Bridge CS4 Extensions\Adobe Output Module' should be at this folder:
'C:\Program Files\Common Files\Adobe\Bridge CS4 Extensions\Adobe Output Module'
Did you have this folder 'C:\Program Files\Common Files\Adobe\Bridge CS4 Extensions\Adobe Output Module' with the '5 folders:
adobeoutputmodule - AMT - contactsheet - medialgallery - resources + 2 files: AdobeOutputModule.jsx and IncludeHelper.jsxinc '.
If not, I would suggest you uninstall and re-install the application. it seems it didn't install to the right place. If you don't want to reinstall, please try following step:
a. move this folder 'C:\Documents and Settings\[useraccount]\Application Data\Adobe\Bridge CS4 Extensions\Adobe Output Module to
'C:\Program Files\Common Files\Adobe\Bridge CS4 Extensions\Adobe Output Module'
b. reset and launch Bridge.

Controlling filenames in web gallery export

I need to export photos of a specific size with the version names the same as the filenames, and since Aperture apparently can't export a batch of images (using the Fiel/Export function) without varying the size a pixel or two (see my thread: "Variable size on export"), I'm trying to use the web gallery function and sizing the pix the exact dimensions I need.
The problem is that Aperture insists on renaming the files "Picture 001, Picture 002, etc., and I need the filename to match the version name.
Anyone found a way to fix this?

Well that's quite a pain. I would have thought that something as simple as exporting to consistent sizes would have been on the top of the 'bug' list. This is a major need for me to output precisely sized low-res photos.
<<btw, this has been discussed previously ... >>
Sorry! I did a search & nothing turned up, but I didn't scroll through all the pages.
Thanks for the tip. I hope someone comes up with a workaround...

Bridge Web Gallery Photos Not Loading

Just upgraded from CS4 to CS6. I had been using the Create Web Photo Album command in CS4 which of course is no longer available.
So, opened Bridge and created an HTML Web Gallery. The HTML Gallery looks great and when I open it with DW locally it works fine in preview mode. After uploading the gallery to the server, the gallery page layout is there but the thumbnails don't load. Page is functional and when I click on one of the thumbnails its large pic page opens but again the pic does not load. The images, both the thumbnails and large images, upload OK and are present on the server.
Here is a link to the album page:
http://ashlandhiking.org/badlink.html
I also tried two other gallery formats; Standard and Lightroom Flash. Both of these worked fine after uploading. So it appears to be a problem associated with the HTML gallery. I tried changing the page doc type to HTML 5 and HTML 4, to no avail.
Please help. Thanks.

It's funny: I had just posted to someone else that they should update to 7.1 to get the web gallery to upload. I didn't realize I was not up all they way myself. So now I'm at 7.1.1.
Problem was, I still had upside down photos.
So the work around I employed was to export the edited photos out, delete the photos within iPhoto, then re-import the edited photos back in. Ah, now they show properly.
Not my favorite solution, but what are you going to do?
I still suspect there might something within the web gallery functionality, which wants to upload the Originals and not the Modifieds. Thoughts anyone?

Web Gallery in CS4

I note that the useful Web Gallery for is no longer in CS4. I think that for the Photographer's community Adobe Lr has taken a good portion of their attention and includes the Web Gallery function on it. But Customize the Web Gallery in Lr adding html code has been impossible due binary code. I created some very cool applications like shopping carts with e-commerce capabilities at http://kendallportraits.com for my Photography Studio in Miami using the Web Gallery Templates in CS3 and I really don't want to loose it in CS4.

then install the old web gallery http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=4048

Web Gallery, Photos Not Correct Rotation

I'm playing around with three photos and uploading them to a web gallery. Problem is, when I see them in Safari, the photos are upside down, which is how they were after their initial import.
In the web gallery project in iPhoto (7.1), the photos have been rotated to display properly, but after the upload, no good.
I deleted the "bad" web gallery, and started over. I've also done a rebuild of the iPhoto library. Not sure what else to try.
I would suspect that the web gallery is drawing from the Originals folder within the iPhoto Library. Sound reasonable?

It's funny: I had just posted to someone else that they should update to 7.1 to get the web gallery to upload. I didn't realize I was not up all they way myself. So now I'm at 7.1.1.
Problem was, I still had upside down photos.
So the work around I employed was to export the edited photos out, delete the photos within iPhoto, then re-import the edited photos back in. Ah, now they show properly.
Not my favorite solution, but what are you going to do?
I still suspect there might something within the web gallery functionality, which wants to upload the Originals and not the Modifieds. Thoughts anyone?

Publishing web gallery without .Mac

Hello,
I finally have my portfolio all set up the way that I want it and would like to publish it. I don't want to have to use .Mac (and since it's replaced by MobileMe now). Is there a way that I can publish this portfolio using a free hosting server?
Thanks!
-Will

Will,
In Aperture, Web Pages or Web Journals can be uploaded to any host site. The Web Gallery function, however, is limited to .Mac use; this is due to functions that are performed on the server and which are specific to .Mac.
-Simon

Converting CS5 Web Gallery to CC Possible ?

The web gallery function in CS5 seems to be completely different in CC.
Original system was Windows XP 32 bit with CS5 PS, that crashed and setup a new system with Windows 7 Pro 64 bit and Adobe CC.
The AOM was installed (Adobe Output Module), which apparently is the new web gallery function.
My question is, can the previous data from the CS5 Web Gallery be migrated to the AOM in CC ?
thanks for your input in advance !

Not sure what you mean exactly. The output files are just HTML which you can edit/ modify anywhere. Modifying the underlying scripts and templates is anotehr story, but as should be obvious, there's a reason why Adobe didn't bother to drag it along... Would be quite a bit of work to polish it up and, which is probably the more critical part, bring it up to current web standards compliance...
Mylenium

How to improve AP2.0 Web Gallery Quality/Functionality for photographers

Hi,
I'm a pro photographer.
I thought AP2.0 plus a (dot)mac account would offer an easy way for my clients to proof images in password protected web galleries and to download images as well. The resulting functionality is poor in my opinion. Is there anything I can do within Aperture or (dot)mac to improve the following problems?
1) Why is the image quality of the web gallery slide show so poor? No sensible client would accept looking at proof images of this low quality. Even flickr is better.
2) Why is there only one download file size, i.e. the original size? In other words, the original file is almost always too large for most web client purchases. Why can't the client choose a smaller version. Even flickr is better, offering several download sizes all based on the original upload.
3) Since the export functionality within Aperture allows for numerous choices of dpi and pixel ratio to export images, why is this same functionality not there for publishing web galleries?
It seems obvious that photographers would want to publish web galleries with exactly the same control that we can export images to disk or flickr. Even within the Apple Mail application we have choices of quality and pixel dimension for the attachments.
What am I missing? Please help.

When you create a Web Gallery in AP2, there is a set up prefernce to let viewers download an Optimized, Actual Size or Optimized and Master Image. (You can only pick one per gallery it seems.)
However, I think the gallery design is rather clunky, too many design options are left open to the viewer, and not the photgrapher. I prefer the web pages and web journals for customer proofing using the image number. They email me their choices, and then using Aperture, I can order prints based on their selection. Not the simplist way, but I would not want clients downloading my images, anyway, as you suggest. Why would they buy a print if they can just download a jpg themselves?

Lost "Web Photo Gallery" Functionality!

I have custom "Web Photo Gallery" templates that I have used for years to present proofs to clients in an .html web gallery. These are no longer funbctioning in CS5. Using a third party solution is not an option unless it can use my pre-existing custom layouts. Running in 32bit mode defeats the purpose of upgrading to the theoreticlly faster and more robust CS5 and does not represent a useful solution. My intention in upgrading was to speed up my workflow. (And also leave behind CS4's eternally crashing Bridge.)
In another thread it was explained that it is not cost effective to correct this issue, but I feel misled. I was specifically told by sales that this functionality was present. I should have been made aware that in order to work, I would need to quit out and reconfigure the software to 32bit mode each time I wish to build a gallery; a solution that is no more helpful than opening CS4 and building web galleries there.
I need some sort of definitive solution that does not slow my process.

I feel your pain about Adobe.. I guess it has become normal to lie to prospective clients or even recurring clients..

Web Gallery function in CS2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for