Web Part specific DOM Manipulation. Two identical Script Editor Web Part code blocks.

We have a script editor web part with javascript that references some jquery libraries.  The code creates web part properties and hides  DIV tag in the web part based on some conditions.  It works great until I try to place the same exact
web part / code block on the same page twice. The way we are rolling this out we don' t users messing the code and we want the WP properties UI to be identical on both Web Parts.
Given all this.. is it possible with jquery code to perform Web Part specific DOM manipulation without any conflict with other similar Web Parts and Script editor code blocks on the page?  Possible to dynamically change DIV Tag IDs, Jquery Variables
and WP Properties to have the unique web part GUID?
Possible?  Any ideas would be appreciated.
demo of issue here:
http://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/coeUlneNT6
Code in question:

Hi,
I suggest you debug your code using IE F12 developer tools. Based on your description, you can try to add some conditions base on the web part ID.
Or you can share your full code for further research.
Best Regards,
Dennis Guo
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Similar Messages

  • Script Editor web part automatically deletes itself

    Hello Community
        On a Team Site there is a web part in a web part zone on a page
    and a Script Editor web part was also added to the web part zone.
        After the Script Editor web part was added CSS code was inserted into
    the Script Editor web part and the page worked fine.
        Then soon after modifying some other parts of the page
    when I run the page some more the Script Editor web part vanishes even
    though I never touched it again because that web part worked fine.
        What could make a web part to delete from a web part zone on a page?
        Thank you
        Shabeaut

    Hi,
    Thanks for your Sharing.
    Best Regards,
    Lisa Chen
    Lisa Chen
    TechNet Community Support

  • Please send me ONE reply rather than two identical copies of that one reply

    Instead of sending me just ONE email as per "subscriptions," they are sending me TWO identical copies of the email. So if two people send me one reply each, A and B, I end up getting FOUR replies: AA, and BB. Yikes!
    I would like to receive just ONE copy. I tried deselecting all of my subscriptions, thinking that I could start fresh and that the problem would correct itself, but the problem persists.
    Please, send me only ONE copy rather than two copies.
    Thanks mucho.
    — Lorna in Southern California

    This web page will help you: http://samsoft.org.uk/iTunes/grouping.asp

  • IQ525A - Two Windows Script Host Error messages, plus folders won't close

    How do I get folders to close, when right clicking will not close them? I am running Trend Micro security and also have two Windows Script Host error messages appearing. I need to click OK to proceed each time I use IQ525A/
    assume IQ is running in safe mode, as start menu and bar is white.Any suggestions
    Thanks
    Kitcat 

    Crash report:
    https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/ab4ee242-57f1-4a84-baef-ca2202150308
    Signature shutdownhang
    Start your '''Computer''' in safe mode with networking. Then start Firefox. Try '''Safe''' web sites.
    '''[http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Linux+Safe+Mode Starting The Computer In Safe Mode;<br>Free Online Encyclopedia]'''
    Wait a few minutes (don't go anywhere), then close it.
    Is the problem still there?

  • Two Identical HDDs + RAID0 + (LVM?) + GPT & GRUB2 + Dual Booting

    Hello,
    I have been reading about RAID, LVM and GPT. RAID0 is interesting to me since I have two identical HDDs in my laptop and I am looking for better performance and less free-space fragmentation.
    My current disk layout looks like the following:
    sda:
    Primary:
    sda1 ntfs system-reserved
    sda2 ntfs windows*
    Logical:
    sda5 ext4 root
    sda6 swap
    sda7 ext4 personal
    sda8 ntfs windows2*
    sdb:
    sdb1 ext4 multimedia
    *windows is the C drive and windows2 is the D drive, just needed extra space so I cut off a part of sda7.
    What I want to achieve (and based on my understanding of RAID0) is the following:
    GPT:
    sdm1 windows
    sdm2 boot
    sdm3 root
    sdm4 home (personal + multimedia from above)
    I will use both sda and sdb for this.
    Questions:
    0. Is that even possible (considering windows)? My expectation is no, unless windows uses the same RAID0 implementation as Linux (partition table/layout data and whatnot). In that case, would it be possible to have something similar to the following:
    GPT:
    sda:
    sda1 windows-c-drive
    sdm1 boot
    sdm2 root
    sdm3 home (personal + multimedia from above)
    sdb:
    sdb1 windows-d-drive
    sdm1 boot
    sdm2 root
    sdm3 home
    * sdm1,2,3 are the RAID partitions laid out over sda and sdb.
    1. I am not sure what LVM can offer me other than flexible movement/resizing of partitions, which I don't need.
    2. Does RAID0 imply read/write parallelism? Which would provide better read/write performance?
    3. Has anyone had experience booting Windows 7 on GPT + RAID0 shared with Linux? (As shown above)
    4. Any suggestions as to how to reach my goal?
    5. I will need to backup everything and reinstall windows and Arch with RAID, correct? Which I am ready to do anyways.

    There is an option in the "BIOS" settings called "Enable UEFI boot". I tried enabling it, nothing changed at all (in other words, no problems arise).
    Last edited by fredmorcos (2011-09-17 18:22:23)

  • Help two identity asserters

    Hello,
    I have a problem while using two identity asserters with two differents tokens.
    My problem is:
    I have two specific identity asserters i developped.
    They are both in REQUIRED mode.
    Identity Asserter one (tokenOne)
    Identity Asserter two (tokenTwo)
    I would like to fire the two asserters when the two tokens are in the request.
    When the two tokens are in the request, il would like to have the name contained in the token two in the name of the request's principal.
    Currently, only the first asserter is fired and the name i find in the request is the one who is contained in tokenOne.
    Thanks you for your answers.
    (Excuse me for my weak english)
    Edited by: user5451975 on 21 janv. 2010 04:51

    Yes but if i return null in the method getAssertionModuleConfiguration, i have a error returned by weblogic:
    javax.security.auth.login.LoginException: [Security:090300]Identity Assertion
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <PrincipalAuthenticator.assertIdentity - Token Type: ICTicket>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <LDAP ATN LoginModule initialized>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <LDAP Atn Login>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <LDAP Atn Login username: test11>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <userExists? user:test11>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <getConnection return conn:LDAPConnection { ldapVersion:2 bindDN:""}>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <getDNForUser search("ou=people,ou=myrealm,dc=devdomain", "(&(uid=test11)(objectclass=person))", base DN & below)>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <DN for user test11: uid=test11,ou=people,ou=myrealm,dc=devdomain>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <user exists, user:test11>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <returnConnection conn:LDAPConnection { ldapVersion:2 bindDN:""}>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <LDAP Atn Asserted Identity for test11>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <List groups that member: test11 belongs to>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <getConnection return conn:LDAPConnection { ldapVersion:2 bindDN:""}>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <getDNForUser search("ou=people,ou=myrealm,dc=devdomain", "(&(uid=test11)(objectclass=person))", base DN & below)>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <DN for user test11: uid=test11,ou=people,ou=myrealm,dc=devdomain>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <search("ou=groups,ou=myrealm,dc=devdomain", "(&(uniquemember=uid=test11,ou=people,ou=myrealm,dc=devdomain)(objectclass=groupOfUniqueNames))", base DN & below)>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <Result has more elements: false>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <returnConnection conn:LDAPConnection { ldapVersion:2 bindDN:""}>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <login succeeded for username test11>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <LDAP Atn Commit>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <LDAP Atn Principals Added>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <Signed WLS principal test11>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <PrincipalAuthenticator.validateIdentity>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <Validate WLS principal test11 returns true>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <RoleManager.getRoles subject: Subject: 1
         Principal = class weblogic.security.principal.WLSUserImpl("test11")
    Resource: type=<url>, application=Cherika, contextPath=/remoting, uri=/remoteService.do, httpMethod=POST>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <Default RoleMapper getRoles(): input arguments:
         Subject: 1
         Principal = class weblogic.security.principal.WLSUserImpl("test11")
         Resource: type=<url>, application=Cherika, contextPath=/remoting, uri=/remoteService.do, httpMethod=POST>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <Default RoleMapper getRoles(): returning roles: Anonymous>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <RoleManager.getRoles Subject: Subject: 1
         Principal = class weblogic.security.principal.WLSUserImpl("test11")
    Resource: <url> type=<url>, application=Cherika, contextPath=/remoting, uri=/remoteService.do, httpMethod=POST Anonymous roles.>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <Default Authorization isAccessAllowed(): input arguments:>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <     Subject: 1
         Principal = class weblogic.security.principal.WLSUserImpl("test11")
    >
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <     Roles:Anonymous>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <     Resource: type=<url>, application=Cherika, contextPath=/remoting, uri=/remoteService.do, httpMethod=POST>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <     Direction: ONCE>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <     Context Handler: >
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <     non-null>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <Default Authorization isAccessAllowed(): returning DENY>
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <DefaultAdjudicatorImpl.adjudicate results: DENY >
    ####<27 janv. 2010 16 h 29 CET> <Debug> <SecurityDebug> <A82S002292> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <AuthorizationManager.isAccessAllowed returning adjudicated: false>
    Why does he try to authenticate the user via LDAP ??
    Edited by: user5451975 on 27 janv. 2010 07:34

  • Can I have two identical PCs with clones of the same hard drive?

    This all started when I had a problem with my first pc, a gateway laptop, would not wake up from sleep due to, supposedly, a driver problem. I didn't want to send it off for my free, under-warrantee, repair and be without a computer for however long that
    would take. So I bought another one and took it to a local dealer to clone the hard drive of the first one to put on the new one.
    This created a number of odd problems which eventually I figured out had something to do, it seemed, with Microsoft not allowing two identical machines to exist like that. I only plan to use one, the other one being exclusively for backup or in case something
    happened to the first. But I think the problems occurred when I tried to switch back and forth, to do some texting.
    Is there a way I can accomplish this?
    Thanks.

    Until Windows 7, it was possible to use two identical PCs with same clone. Provided, both the PCs must be legally licensed to use the Windows operating system (version as well as edition) and of same OEM, model and spec. This is possible because, the product
    keys are common for all the PCs of same OEM build (if preinstalled, and the installed product key is different from the one mentioned in COA). This made OEM builders to distribute to more PCs than the license agreement, which is impossible for Microsoft to
    find out. To solve this issue, Microsoft changed the licensing structure from Windows 8 - embedding the product key in BIOS. So, here, only the installation is provided and the product keys are not common for all the PCs even if they are of the same OEM build.
    Therefore, cloning fails here. And naturally, as Team Zigzag and EC Ltd say, same product key can't be used for more than one PC.
    As to restore the PC in case of an emergency, you can perform a backup of the existing installed software and user files, which can be restored later (File History in Windows 8). The following links may be helpful:
    http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-8/what-happened-to-backup-restore
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/keithmayer/archive/2013/09/17/backup-amp-recovery-of-windows-8-windows8-itpro-tipoftheday.aspx#.UkC-hmLrbIU
    Balaji Kundalam

  • My iPhone has two identical options under "iTunes wi-fi sync" that are the same computer. I only have one user on my  computer, and I tried moving my iTunes file in Finder to organize it and now my library's not synced with my phone. Help?

    My iPhone has two identical options under "iTunes wi-fi sync" that are the same computer. I only have one user on my computer, and I tried moving my iTunes file in Finder to organize it and now my library's not synced with my phone. Help?

    I have the same problem. Right now my iPhone 5S shows 3 instances of the computer to which it is connected under Settings » General » iTunes WiFi Sync. I'm having problems connecting and syncing, and this is probably the cause: the phone chooses one of these connections, and it isn't the one that's actually in use. What's probably happening is that the phone and computer establish a connection using a dynamic IP address, the address becomes "disassociated" due to error, another address is associated, the phone retains each address/link, and each link is displayed as if it represents a separate computer (the fact that the name of the computer is identical is ignored, as the only thing that is considered important is the IP address). But that's all conjecture. More important, I'm not sure how to fix the problem. A network reset doesn't do it.

  • Certificate error on only one of two identical systems?

    I recently installed two COMPLETELY identical Ubuntu 12.04 systems, PC01 and PC02. The browser is latest version of Mozilla Firefox.
    When visiting https://www.komplett.dk/k/signin.aspx with PC01, the connection is secure and everything is OK, no error messages. When visiting the same URL with PC02, the following error message is shown:
    This Connection is Untrusted
    You have asked Firefox to connect securely to www.komplett.dk, but we can't confirm that
    your connection is secure.
    Normally, when you try to connect securely, sites will present trusted identification to prove
    that you are going to the right place. However, this site's identity can't be verified.
    What Should I Do?
    If you usually connect to this site without problems, this error could mean that someone is
    trying to impersonate the site, and you shouldn't continue.
    Get me out of here!
    Technical Details
    www.komplett.dk uses an invalid security certificate.
    The certificate is not trusted because no issuer chain was provided.
    (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)
    I understand the Risks
    Why is this happening when the systems are COMPLETLY identical? i have tried to delete the profile folder on both systems, but the result is the same. NO certificates has been manually installed on PC01, so that is not the reason. The file size of cert8.db on PC01 is 94K and on PC02 it is 64K, I do not understand how the size can be different when the profiles are newly created.
    I would really like to find out why I am experiencing different behaviour with Firefox, on two identical systems, so any suggestions or ideas are very welcome.

    The Technical Details show:
    <blockquote>www.komplett.dk uses an invalid security certificate.
    The certificate is not trusted because no issuer chain was provided.
    (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)
    </blockquote>
    The www.komplett.dk server doesn't send a required intermediate certificate.
    *VeriSign Class 3 Extended Validation SSL SGC CA
    You can inspect the certificate chain via a site like this:
    *http://www.networking4all.com/en/support/tools/site+check/
    You can install the intermediate certificate from networking4all site or from this VeriSign page (it is the second one).
    *http://www.verisign.com/support/verisign-intermediate-ca/extended-validation-pro/index.html
    Copy the certificate text to a .cer text file and import this file in the Certificate Manager.
    *Options/Preferences > Advanced > Encryption: Certificates - View Certificates

  • Problem with ORA-06502 when exp/imp between two identical versions

    Hi
    I have two identical systems, one system that I develop on and
    the test system. The two systems have the same version of the
    Portal. When I export and then import the application from the
    systems I get a error message on the test system.
    ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character to number
    conversion error (WWV-11230)
    This error does not appear on the developing system.
    The application I have is a form on a table, and I have some
    buttons with PL/SQL handels on them. I tried to remove this code
    and export with no luck.
    Please help.
    The system:
    Windows NT
    Oracle Portal 3.0.8.9.8
    Thanks
    Jvrgen Swensen

    Could you pls confirm : Have you exported & Imported the shared
    components used by that form?
    If you are not too worried about the templates/fonts then try
    this:
    Click on "Edit" link against that form and click "OK".
    Thanx,
    Chetan.

  • I have two identical Mail accounts. How can I delete one without losing all the mail in both accounts?

    I have two identical Mail accounts.  Don't know how that happened -- the second one just showed up one day. If I try to delete one account, I get a warning that all mail in the accounts will be permanently lost.  How can I delete one of the duplicate accounts without losing messages in both accounts?

    Download the yahoo email app, if you already deleted and reinstalled the email account and still have issue.
    This is a known issue with Yahoo email account.

  • When I synch a file "best photos" via iTunes to my iPhone I get two identical files - "best photos" and Photo library.  I don't know why

    When I synch a file "best photos" via iTunes to my iPhone I get two identical files - "best photos" and Photo library.  I don't know why

    All photos transferred from your computer via the iTunes sync process are stored in the iPhone's Photo Library.
    When transferring multiple albums or a single album, the photos in the albums below are not duplicated as in taking double the storage capacity for the photos. Photos in an album or albums below include a pointer to the original photos stored in the Photo Library.
    This way you can view the photos in an album only by selecting the album, or all photos in all albums by selecting Photo Library. Makes more sense when transferring multiple photo albums from your computer but the same applies when transferring a single album or folder of photos.
    The same applies to iTunes playlists. A song placed in a playlist is not duplicated.

  • DOM Based Cross-Site Scripting issue in RoboHelp 10

    We're using a WebHelp system originally deplyed using RoboHelp 9.0.2.271, and a recent security scan revealed the DOM based cross-site scripting issue.
    I recently upgraded to RoboHelp 10, migrated my help system to this version, and redeployed the system, but our security scan is still detecting the cross-scripting vulnerability in WebHelp. Wasn't this issue resolved in RoboHelp 10?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I’m not a security expert, but this script reads the URL of the current topic and redirects to the current topic with a bookmark. This is needed for when the same topic is used in multiple locations in the TOC.
    I’ll ask around about this security issue.
    Greet,
    Willam

  • How can I link specific cells in two different speadsheets so the data from a specific cell in spreadsheet A automatically updates in a specific cell in spreadsheet B. It works in Xcel- Any ideas?

    How can I link specific cells in two different tables so the data from a specific cell in table A automatically updates in a specific cell in table B? It works in Xcel- Any ideas?

    (1) your title ask the way to link different spreadsheets.
    In Numberland, a spreadsheet is an entire document.
    There is no way to link different documents.
    (2) in the message, you ask the way to link different tables.
    This feature is available and is described in iWork Formulas and Functions User Guide (which is available for free from the Help menu).
    Getting the info just requires a simple search in this available resource !
    Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) 14 mai 2011 10:37:50

  • Problem storing two identical qualifications with different proficiencies

    Hi Experts,
    I am trying to store qualifications in infotype 0024 (although the actual data ends up in HRP1001).  My issue is that if an employee holds two identical qualifications (ex. CPR) with two proficiencies (ex. basic and advanced), the system will not let me store both of them.  It either forces the earlier one's date to be delimited, thus making it no longer valid, or if the date range for the qualifications are the same, deletes the earlier one entirely and just saves the new one.
    I know that this is because the key is duplicated in HRP1001.  BUT, HRP1001 also contains a SEQNR field that should handle this, but I cannot get it to work?  Is there a way to activate HRP1001-SEQNR?
    I have tried playing with the time constraints.  I assume that '3' is the one to use, but I still can't get all of the qualifications to save.
    Any ideas??
    Thanks in advance!
    Shane LaBonte

    Hi Roman,
    I want to use the Qualifications infotype because we need the data in e-recruitment as well.
    I used CPR as a broad example.  I am in the K-12 Education sector.  A real-life example would be an employee that holds the qualification: Intermediate & Senior.  The proficiency of this qualification could be: Music.  Another could be: Law.
    There is a college that all teachers must register through to get their qualifications recognized.  We are at their mercy in terms of how a qualification is defined.  And because of the sheer number of qualifications that could exist (we're talking upwards of 1000), we DO NOT want to get into any sort of mappings between a qualification coming from the college converted into a different qualification recorded at our end.
    Any ideas?  I know this problem is quite unique.
    Thanks
    Shane

Maybe you are looking for