Webaccess on linux with no local domain?

How can I install webaccess on a Linux box that does not have the domain directory?
The machine is puerly a gateway between the internet and the back end groupwise box.
GW7
SLES10 ( for web access )
NW6.5.7 ( For mta/poa/etc.... )
Thanks
Robin

Hi,
twinturbo wrote:
>
> I assume I have to create a "second domain" in my existing system
Correct.
> But form console one on the linux box there is no way to access the
> domain directory on the netware box in order to add the second domain
> into the system.
You're looking at this backwards. You need to use the same ConsoleOne
you use today to manage your GW. *That* instance of ConsoleOne must be
able to map a drive to the new server. You need this anyways to be able
to admin it. The new server does *not* need to connect anywhere.
> Or do I create a new system on the Linux?
No!
CU,
Massimo Rosen
Novell Product Support Forum Sysop
No emails please!
http://www.cfc-it.de

Similar Messages

Create OD Kerberos record with Windows .local domain

I am in the process of setting up my open directory master that will be working in a golden triangle with our existing windows domain. Our windows FQDN ends with .local and all dns is running on this domain.
I am unable to create a kerberos record for the open directory because of the .local domain. The xserver thinks the FQDN is a Bonjour name and will not create the record.
If anyone has an Idea on how to work around this problem I would apreciate your help.
Thank you

OD uses AD kerberos

Leopard server "Workgroup mode" with AD .Local Domain

I am unable to get the Workgroup mode to work on our network. I have the machine set up in DNS. When I get to the screen where you enter the Host name I get an error that there is no DNS Server. I know that DNS is working because setup auto populates the correct name in this field. I suspect that I get this error because we are using a .local domain name. Can this be verified?

Dunno if this is related or not but I just read this here:
http://images.apple.com/itpro/pdf/ADBest_Practices2.0.pdf
{quote}.local domains
Since Mac OS X uses the .local domain for Bonjour (link-local addressing), it will conﬂ ict
with any .local AD domain. To get around this, add .local to the search domain settings
in the Network preference pane. All .local DNS queries will be unicast to the DNS servers
before being multicast to the network.{quote}

Office 365 Deployment with new local domain

I just started working for a company that has somewhat implemented Office 365 to about 100 users. They are mostly using it for Exchange Online. No ADFS or AD Sync has been done between the on-premise domain and Office365.
The same user accounts do exist in the local domain.
Once we get ADFS and AD Sync working what will happen between the Office365 accounts and the local accounts. For instance, in Office365 we have
[email protected] and locally we have a user
[email protected] Will the accounts just sync together and use the information from the local domain since the IDs are the same.

Hi,
This is the forum to discuss questions and feedback for Microsoft Office client. There is so much about Office 365
Directory integration aspect here, I would suggest you to post in the forum of Office Community, where you can get more experienced responses:
http://community.office365.com/en-us/f/613.aspx
The reason why we recommend posting appropriately is you will get the most qualified pool of respondents, and other partners who read the forums regularly can either share their knowledge or learn from your interaction with us. Thank you for your understanding.
Regards,
Ethan Hua
TechNet Community Support
It's recommended to download and install
Configuration Analyzer Tool (OffCAT), which is developed by Microsoft Support teams. Once the tool is installed, you can run it at any time to scan for hundreds of known issues in Office
programs.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Share core 9iAS (Linux) with other local users?

Finally set up core 9iAS on Red Hat. Now I'd like to know how to configure it to either start as a system service, be runnable by users other than 'oracle', or be persistent even after 'oracle' logs off. Bottom line: disassociate the 9iAS processes from the 'oracle' user session.
Since I only have one dual-boot Linux box for dev purpose (no dedicated server here! :-)), what I want to do is to first start 9iAS, then connect to it from a regular user account via JDeveloper.
Tried changing file permissions and using nohup - neither works.
Thanks,
Miles

Creating new users for SMB access is way too complicated, because Apple has not really implemented the "sharing user" fully for SMB users. Thus, when you create a new user, and go to System Prefs -> Sharing -> File Sharing -> Options, the sharing user is NOT listed under the users to enable for access via SMB.
However, there is a workaround that can get your "sharing user" up and going via SMB.
1. Go to System Prefs -> Accounts. Click on the padlock to authenticate as admin.
2. Then right click on your "sharing only" user (not Guest) and select "advanced...".
3. There you will see that the Login Shell is set to a particular value (/usr/bin/false from memory). Take note of the value that is there.
4. Change this value (from the drop down list) to "/bin/bash".
5. Go to Sharing -> File Sharing -> Options... You will see that your sharing only user is now listed under SMB sharing.
6. Tick the box for SMB sharing on the sharing only user and enter the password for that user.
7. Go back to Accounts. Right click on your "sharing only" user and select "advanced..."
8. Type in the value that you took note of in step 3 at "Login Shell" (and press ok).
That's it! Now you can connect from Windows using the new sharing only user.
In effect, this process temporarily enable the "sharing only" user for shell login to your Mac. By doing so, it enables the SMB password to be set. You then disable the shell login capability , and SMB sharing is enabled, whilst shell login is disabled.
If you ever want to remove SMB access through that user, you will need to repeat the steps again, (although this time you will have to untick the box in step 6.
Cheers,
Rodney
p.s. I have done this, and it works well for me. That said, you should back up your system before mucking around with advanced options. Just to be on the safe side.

DNS: Client can't connect because .local domain isn't in DNS. How can I connect over the WAN to server.domain.local?

So my 2012 server is set up on the LAN with a .local domain name.
Remote Desktop Services are set up and remoteapp stuff works fine on the LAN.
I've set up port forwarding so I can connect to the server over the WAN too, but remoteapp stuff is a bit different. I can connect to the server by specifying the correct IP address. Giving a Web browser the address
https://serverIPAddress/RDWeb
lets me get the login screen and see the range of apps for me to run. I select one, the connectoid is downloaded correctly (in Chrome) and I click on the downloaded connectoid.
Unfortunately, rather than pursuing the sensible IP-address approach that I started with, the connectoid has been given the server's name on the LAN: server.domain.local. Clearly, the client machine tries to look this up but DNS hasn't heard of
it because it's a .local address.
I cannot be the only one to have come across this apparent oversight on Microsoft's part. Any ideas as to how this can sensibly be overcome? Obviously, I could put the IP address translation into every client's hosts file (and I've done this and shown it
works) but I've got too many clients to mess about like this. Anybody know 'the Microsoft way' to fix this?
Thank you for checking this out -- I am confident the details of the problem are completely specified in this query but, if I'm wrong, please ask.
Many thanks again,
Biffo

Hi,
I would like to suggest you to follow the checklist.
Checklist: Make RemoteApp Programs Available from the Internet
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc772415.aspx
Thanks.
Jeremy Wu
TechNet Community Support

Firefox on Linux doesnt connect to .local domains

Hello,
im running FF 3.6.18 on Ubuntu (64bit, 32bit) and im not able to connect to any domain ending in .local (for example: apple.fruits.local). Name resolution is working, prefetching and fixup is disabled. Using FF on windows works without a problem with the same domain name - only in Linux it fails.

Hi!
Thats quite simpel:
.local domains belong to the zeroconf system ( linux: avahi, apple: bonjour, windows: zeroconf) - so if you enter a www.dummy.local than the request is not forwarded to the DNS server it is forwarded to the MDNS and in many networks simply not resolvable.
Turn of the avahi, bonjour or zeroconf service or daemon and it will work again
regards
Martin

Local Domain Index query fails with ora-01410: invalid rowid

Hello!
I have a task to implement partitioned domain index for range partitioned table.
As I understood from reference http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/appdev.111/b28425/dom_idx.htm
the main difference is to provide support for partitioning operations by
implementing corresponding ODCI interface functions.
For the first I decided to create something simple to not spend time on system partitioned
index storage table. My problem is that domain index works correctly when it's created without
support for partitioning and produces "*ORA-01410: INVALID ROWID*" when it's created
with LOCAL option.
Test query:
SELECT /* +index(from_sample_index) */ * FROM index_in_partitioned_tbl WHERE position_between(card_no) < 50 ORDER BY card_no DESC;
Index creared in this way returns 3 rows:
CREATE INDEX from_sample_index ON index_in_partitioned_tbl (card_no) INDEXTYPE IS position_indextype;
When index has been creared with LOCAL option I got "ORA-01410: INVALID ROWID" :
CREATE INDEX from_sample_index ON index_in_partitioned_tbl (card_no) INDEXTYPE IS position_indextype LOCAL;
I don't post implementation's source code to reduce amount of text in post. It works for global index.
If I copy rowid from index storage table and then put it into something like
SELECT card_no FROM index_in_partitioned_tbl WHERE rowid = 'AAAXHGAAEAAAFERAAh';
then it will be executed successfully without any errors.
I suppose the error could be somehow linked with "alter index" calls that Oracle makes when local domain index is created.
The calls are made with option "AlterIndexRebuild" - possibly they mark index as invalid (though it's shown as valid in SQL Developer)

Solved :)
when index is LOCAL calls for ODCIINDEXSTART - ODCIINDEXFETCH - ODCIINDEXCLOSE are executed for each partition of base table.
In my case ODCIINDEXFETCH returns row_id's regardless of partition that are currently scanned for values. So first call returned rowid values for all partitions not only for the first partition and validation failed with "ora-01410: invalid rowid"

Macbook pro with OS 10.6.4 cannot join Windows SBS 2008 .local domain

Hi,
I just had a windows SBS 2008 installed and it controls a .local domain where all my Windows7 PC's are connected to. I can access the internet wired/wirelessly but i cannot see any of the computers on the network at all, thus i cannot share files or share the printer which is connected to one of the local PC's.
I have read many threads indicating possible fixes but no one has been able to give me a permanent solution. Is this inability to connect my MAC to the SBS 2008 local domain fixable from my MAC or is it to be resolved from the SBS 2008 side? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Greetings,
Download the combo update (don't install it yet): http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1400
SafeBoot your computer: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1455
While in SafeBoot install the combo update
Restart the computer to come out of SafeBoot
Try running software update again and see if it works.
Hope that helps.

Oracle10g Installation problem on Linux with DHCP IP

Hi,
I am new to Oracle Products, I have tried to install Oracle 10G on Linux with DHCP IP.
I got the following warning while installing even though I have loopback interface configured.
Checking Network Configuration requirements ...
Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Failed <<<<
Problem: The install has detected that the primary IP address of the system is DHCP-assigned.
Recommendation: Oracle supports installations on systems with DHCP-assigned public IP addresses. However, the primary network interface on the system should be configured with a static IP address in order for the Oracle Software to function properly. See the Installation Guide for more details on installing the software on systems configured with DHCP.
Please help me in resolving this problem or Can I ignore this message?
My Server Configurations:
[root@SQAESMRH5 Oracle_Install_Errors]# ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:12:3F:79:FA:2C
inet addr:10.10.121.61 Bcast:10.10.121.2 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::212:3fff:fe79:fa2c/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:20751998 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:19278549 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:2150795393 (2.0 GiB) TX bytes:438232502 (417.9 MiB)
Interrupt:177
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:12383146 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:12383146 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:1965045834 (1.8 GiB) TX bytes:1965045834 (1.8 GiB)
[root@SQAESMRH5 Oracle_Install_Errors]# cat /etc/hosts
# Do not remove the following line, or various programs
# that require network functionality will fail.
#::1 localhost6.localdomain6 localhost6
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
#::1 localhost6.localdomain6 localhost6
[root@SQAESMRH5 Oracle_Install_Errors]#

This warning means it is not recommended to install Oracle 10g on a DHCP assigned IP address. It could work, but you won't be able to configure Enterprise Manager, since this tool requires a fixed IP address. If possible, have the IP address fixed.
~ Madrid
http://hrivera99.blogspot.com/

"Sharepoint 2013" is giving error that prevents local domain users authentication for "Team Foundation Server"

I am getting 2 errors through the event viewer that prevents TFS 2013 authentication for local domain users, also this error started appearing after having TFS upgraded to [ 12.0.30723.0 (Tfs2013.Update3) ].
1st Error (from administrative events):
The Execute method of job definition Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPUsageImportJobDefinition (ID a51a0244-765d-433b-8502-0bb0540ad1fd) threw an exception. More information is included below.
Access to the path 'C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\15\LOGS' is denied.
Tried so far:-
- changed the path to another folder from "Diagnostic Logging" in another drive, but still getting the same error.
2nd Error (from application server):
DistributedCOM error
The application-specific permission settings do not grant Local Activation permission for the COM Server application with CLSID
{000C101C-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}
and APPID
{000C101C-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}
to the user NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE SID (S-1-5-20) from address LocalHost (Using LRPC). This security permission can be modified using the Component Services administrative tool.
Which I already got fixed using the following steps on a thread I opened before (but still getting the same error).
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/3896e35c-b99a-4d30-b662-f92d337c8d6f/windows-servers-components-services-and-regedit-permissions-are-grayed-out-for-my-admin-account?forum=winservergen
Other Fixes I tried
- Found on another topic that it is not sharepoint that is causing the problem, but it is the generated ASP.NET web pages used for testing is causing the memory to fill up due to cashing on RAM, the fix suggested to change IIS cashing from RAM to HD to prevent
loading up using w3wp.exe from processes.
Concern
- by checking other topics for people having the same problem, it was mentioned that this error appeared after the lastest TFS update, is there is a fix for it ?

Hi Kpdn,
Thanks for your post.
All your participation and support are very important to build such harmonious/ pleasant / learning environment for MSDN community.
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Exchange 2013 / 2010 coexistence with different public domains

Currently in my organization
1x Exchange 2010 Standard w/SP3 - Client Access / Hub Transport
1x Exchange 2010 Standard w/SP3 - Unified Messaging Server (we also have Lync 2013 in the environment)
1x Exchange 2010 Standard w/SP3 - Mailbox
In my organization, we have approximately 600 mailboxes - 100 office staff, and 500 field employees using a mixture of Outlook 2007/2010/2013 and various mobile devices. Most of our field employees are in remote locations, several hundred
miles away. We have no IT staff in any of our field locations.
We also have two public domains that we use, though we are trying to phase out the old one to unify everything.
domain-old.com - Used when the company had a different name. All Exchange services are published with this one.
domain-new.com - Used after the company changed names. The goal is to publish all Exchange services with this one.
domain.local - Our internal Active Directory domain.
We use Microsoft Exchange Online Protection for all inbound/outbound email. We publish OWA, ActiveSync, etc. through our Sophos firewall. Also, we have two KEMP LoadMaster appliances that for high availability that we currently use for Lync 2013; they are
severely underutilized.
Goals for the Exchange migration
My primary goal is to introduce high availability into our environment by introducing redundancy on multiple levels. I would like to accomplish this by utilizing Exchange 2013 since we will need to purchase additional licensing anyway. My idea of the
final topology is:
2x KEMP LoadMaster appliances providing reverse proxy and load balancing to the CAS servers
2x Physical servers running Hyper-V, separated physically but in the same AD site. Each one would run:
1x VM with Exchange 2013 Standard w/SP1 - Client Access
1x VM with Exchange 2013 Enterprise w/SP1 - Mailbox - Utilizing DAGs for high-availability
I'd like all the new Exchange services to be published under the domain-new.com domain - such as mail.domain-new.com, mail.domain-new.com/owa, smtp.domain-new.com, etc.
We have purchased two new physical servers that will be Hyper-V hosts running Server 2012R2. My timeframe to start this project is within the next two weeks, so I'll be running the new Exchange 2013 VMs under Server 2012, not R2 as it won't be supported
until Exchange 2013 SP3 is released.
Deployment Plan
Install Exchange 2013 on new VMs.
Create CAS Array object.
Configure Exchange 2013 to publish under the new namespace.
Perform mailbox moves to 2013 for a small group (1-5 users) at a time. Recreate Outlook profiles and mobile device profiles for that group. Test and move to the next group.
Once all users are moved to the new namespace, decommission the Exchange 2010 servers.
Unknowns
My primary unknown is about the namespaces. All of the guides I have read strictly deal with keeping the existing namespace and having the Exchange 2013 CAS proxy requests to Exchange 2010 for mailboxes still on 2010. This should never be an issue for us
since we'll be using the new domain for each mailbox we move.
My question boils down to, is this a supported way to migrate to Exchange 2013? And if so, are there some materials or information to help me perform it this way?

Hi,
From the description, you want to install Exchange 2013 in another domain and then migrate from Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013.
About DAG, all servers in a DAG must be running the same operating system. If there is only one mailbox server, there is no need to deploy DAG.
About CAS array, we should know that the CAS Array no longer exists in Exchange 2013.
About the namespace, based on my knowledge, we can introduce a new namespace. Just as what you said "This should never be an issue for us since we'll be using the new domain for each mailbox we move".
Here are some articles about how to upgrade from Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013 in the same organization.
Checklist: Upgrade from Exchange 2010
Install Exchange 2013 in an Existing Exchange 2010 Organization
Upgrade from Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Belinda
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

Local domain, IIS Hosting and SMTP issues.

I have a local domain on Windows server 2012 with dns, dhcp, iis and smtp. (Yes, I am aware of the dangers of these combinations) it is for learning purposes only and not my main pc.
My local domain is willow.run and I am hosting a website, the domain for that is machinerylubricant.com I have IIS 8 installed (6.0 also for smtp)
My original issue was getting IIS to send an email to localhost through a php script for a contact form hosted on the website. I finally got to where it appears to be sending the contact form info to my drop folder but I ahve no idea how to get that .EML
file to actually forward to gmail account or even outlook on my computer/server.
In the email file (.eml in drop folder) it says "To: *******@gmail.com" as it is supposed to but that email is not making it to the specified gmail account. Also no error messages in the ph logs or the log files for smtp. How would I go about setting
up a email program to work on the lan with the acual www domain name I own?
I am learning everything at once basically, windows server, coding, protocols etc. Please bare with me.

Rather than answer your specific question, how about I give you the best way to achieve what you're looking for?
For inbound messages, you want to use the "aliasdetourhost" keyword. Check the documentation for how this is set up.
For outbound messages, you want to use the "alternate conversion channel"
When used together, this will achieve what you're looking for, without the looping that you have generated....
The alternate conversion channel was written up here:
http://ims.balius.com/resources/downloads/files/AlternateConversion.pdf

.local domain and autodiscover issues

I want to preface this by saying I am a new administrator.
Our SSL cert recently expired, and since .local domains can no longer be on certs, were registered a CA cert with autodiscover.domain.com and mail.domain.com. This new cert was successfully applied, but whenever someones opens their e-mail they get a warning
about the name on the server not matching the cert. I
I'm pretty sure this is juts a few DNS records I need to update but I don't know which ones and really need some guidance.
Thanks for your time.

So what you are saying is that his current DNS for company.com (which his internal users use for external access) needs to be duplicated internally, then modified to support his internal email access? I've set up many systems where internal DNS and
external DNS hosted the same name, and it is far from simple as "a new zone takes less than a minute to create". How do you handle internal access to external sites (which is currently working just fine with his external DNS)?
To answer your question, my recommendation is that his internal clients use AutoDiscover to gain their internal settings. Keep in mind that while the Exchange server may be in the .local domain, the SMTP domain they host is a .com domain. And since his servers
are in a domain, any domain-attached Outlook client will be able to access the mailbox successfully.
Just create a new DNS record pointing to the external host. Or get a new domain name that doesn't have external websites, then create a new DNS zone for that.
Alright, so with your recommendation - he updates his clients to use Autodiscover, which they are likely already using, to gain internal settings. And then what do you configure the internal URLs as?
For example - Autodiscover.
You set the AutoDiscoverServiceInternalURI to servername.domain.local -> he still gets a cert prompt every time he opens Outlook.
You set the AutoDiscoverServiceInternalURI to mail.domain.com to match the certificate -> Now ALL autodiscover requests from all clients are going out to the internet, then back into the Public VIP.
Same with EWS. And this is assuming he's using RPC/TCP rather than HTTP. So then he's either going to get prompts for cert every time he opens outlook and checks OOF or mailtips, or all internal clients are going to use the external VIP for Autodiscover
and EWS.

Connect LDAP service to local domain

Is there anyone who can tell me if it's possible to connect form the LDAP service to a local domain?
I have made a new local domain with some groups and users in the Domain management in LC ES admin module.
Now I want to retrieve those users to my prcess in workbench with the LDAP service, but I can't get it to connect to the new domain (it works fine when I connect to our company AD).
I have tried with Base DN: DC=NewDomain,DC=local and Search filter: cn=* but with no luck :-(
Is it possible to connect to the local domaim from the LDAP service if it is, what should the "Base DN" look like and what are the atributes to use in the search filter?
Thanks
Søren

I think you are getting a few things mixed up.
When you create the users in a local domain, you're in fact creating them in the LiveCycle database. Not in a LDAP system. LiveCycle NEVER writes to an LDAP system. It only reads from it.
When LC integrates with an LDAP system (like when you create an enterprise domain in adminui), it connects to an external LDAP system and sychronizes with it. I also adds a copy of the users in its database.
The LDAP service does the same thing is the sense that it just connects to a external LDAP system to get a list of users.
If you want to query the users from the livecycle database you can use the User Lookup service (under Foundation) instead.
Jasmin

Webaccess on linux with no local domain?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for