Webdynpro - Check if a portal user has a user in R/3 Backend

Hi Experts,
i have following problem, and maybe some of you can help me out with an idea or (much better) a solution:
Our Company is running an Enterprise Portal on NW2004s (SPS 18). Currently i am developing a Java WebDynpro Application for the portal called Transactionstarter. Withhin this application a portal user can simply add a backend System (R/3), a transaction and a Description. This information will be stored in a xml file in userhome in KM. When the user clicks the description, SAP WinGui will open with the transaction he defined before. We use SSO for opening the transaction if the user has a backend user. If not, the loginscreen of the backend will appear.
All this works fine.
Now we have the requirement for an automated system check.
The portal user can run an initial system check. This system check should check all configured backend systems if the portal user has a user in R/3 backend.
But how can i check if my portal user exists in backend?
I cannot use JCO because we have a lot of Systems (more than 300 all together) and i don´t want to create a destination for every system. Or did i misunderstood something with JCO?
Does anyone of you have a solution, how i can check every system, if the portal user has also a backend user?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Pascal

Hi Pascal,
with JCO you can use also the method JCO.createClient:
public static JCO.Client createClient(java.lang.String client,
                                      java.lang.String user,
                                      java.lang.String passwd,
                                      java.lang.String lang,
                                      java.lang.String mshost,
                                      java.lang.String r3name,
                                      java.lang.String group)
Creates an instance of a client connection to a remote SAP system (with load balancing)
Parameters:
client - SAP logon client
user - SAP logon user
passwd - SAP logon password
lang - SAP logon language
mshost - Host name of the message server
r3name - Name of the SAP system
group - Name of the group of application servers
Returns:
the newly created client
for connections to other systems. So you can avoid to create destinations
Regards
Matteo
Edited by: Matteo Fusi on Apr 1, 2009 11:33 AM

Similar Messages

One Portal user has several user in other systems - how to handle SSO

Hi,
I read a lot through several threads but could not really find the information that I need:
Problem:
Each PERSON has ONLY ONE unique portal user to log in. In SAP SRM / EBp these persons sometimes must have multiple users. Normally they login in than with TIMO1 or TIMO2 etc..
But how can we handle that with SSO?
The SOO cookie will always login only one explicit user.
Such that I thought about a BSP application or something in-between: Portals opens this custom application via SSO. The application deletes the SSO cookie and depending on the selected user it will login the user to EPb / SRM.
Who has any Ideas how to realize that. Or is there a better possibility for that?
Thanks for HELP
TIMO

Hello Guys ...
thanks for the posts, but I think I did not make realy clear what I need:
SOO works fine, that is OK.
But I need to login from the portal, being loged in as user 1243243 (we use numbers) into EBp (SRM) as JOHN or JOHN2. Depending on the company I would like to shop for.
I am aware of the fact, that SAP Portal offers something like user-mapping. But we would like to avoid aditional maintenance in the Portal area (internal reasond). So user-mapping in the portal is no option.
I think I realy need such a "LOGIN APPLICATION" inbetween
PORTAL - LOGIN APP - SRM
Thanks 4 your help!

Your user has no SAP Support Portal user assigned

Hi all,
in transaction SM37 I found a job that almost everytime ends with error. Name of the job is "SM:SYNC SAP SESSIONS" and it's executed daily. The error message is :
Job started
Step 001 started (program RDSWPCISERVICEPLAN, variant &0000000000452, user ID SYS_JOBYSAP)
Your user has no SAP Support Portal user assigned
Job cancelled after system exception ERROR_MESSAGE
Everyday the job is scheduled automatically by another job "SM:SCHEDULER". I suppose that is same on your systems.
I know the error message say that I should try to assign S-user to user SYS_JOBYSAP but I think it should not be the problem because some days the job ends with no errors. Also when I duplicate some old job (with status Cancelled) and execute it immediately the job ends in green.
Do you have any idea what could be wrong? Is it possible that there is some problem with connection to SAP almost regularly everyday in same time?
Best regards,
Zbynek

I would like to check whether the SAP service that is used by job SM:SYNC SAP SESSIONS is running in given time. I need to re-schedule job SM:SYNC SAP SESSIONS to other time. How is it possible? I think the job SM:SCHEDULER uses some table that contains detail informations about scheduled jobs. Is it right? Do you know name of the table?
Regards
Zbynek

Log to check as to which user has accessed which report?

Hi,
I am using BOBJ for report creation and SAP BI for datawarehousing.
The user can access these reports using the iviews created in the portal. Due to some performance testing requirements we need to check which user accessed which report and if he has drilled down to a particular level in a report, then there should be a means to know that as well.
BO offers a few standard activity reports to check which user has done which activity. However the details of drill down etc. cannot be checked using that. Please help as to how can we check that too.
Best Regards,
Neha

Hi,
See [Business Objects|/community [original link is broken]; and [Crystal Reports|/community [original link is broken]; forums for this topic.
-Paul

How do I sign my VB / VS 2010 based shared COM add-in for Excel so it loads when the user has checked "Require application add-ins to be signed by a trusted publisher"?

My COM add-in is developed using VS 2010 and VB. It's a shared COM add-in (not VSTO) and it works with Excel 2007 - 2013. My installer is signed with a code signing certificate but it would appear that my add-in's .dll should also be signed if the user has
checked the "Require application add-ins to be signed by a trusted publisher" option.
The "Sign the assembly" option is checked in my add-in's VB -> My Project -> Signing. I have a .snk file selected which I seem to recall generating 6 or 7 years ago when I ported the COM add-in from VB6 to .NET.
I have an up-to-date Comodo code signing certificate (a pfx file called MyCompanyCodeSigningCertificatePrivateKey.pfx) which I purchased to use with the installer and was wondering if and how I could use this.
I tried selecting my pfx file in the My Project -> Signing -> "Choose a strong name key file" dialog. It made a copy of the pfx file in my project folder but when I tried to build the project, I got the following error:
Error 1 Cannot import the following key file: MyCompanyCodeSigningCertificatePrivateKey.pfx. The key file may be password protected. To correct this, try to import the certificate again or manually install the certificate to the Strong Name CSP with the
following key container name: VS_KEY_C0B6F251F0FB6016
After a little research, I found out I might be able to use signtool to sign the dll in a post-build step.
I added the following command to the post-build event, before the command I use to regasm the assembly.
"path to signtool\signtool" sign /f "MyCompanyCodeSigningCertificatePrivateKey.pfx" /p "xxxx" /v "$(TargetPath)"
When I built the project, the dll appeared to get signed (the output window showed a bunch of confirming text as well as "Successfully signed: c:\MyAddIn\bin\Release\MyAddIn.dll") but the next step in the post-build (regasm myaddin.dll /codebase)
issued a warning RA0000 (see below) but reported "Types registered successfully".
Here's the message I get from regasm, even though the output window says the dll was sucessfully signed:
RegAsm : warning RA0000: Registering an unsigned assembly with /codebase can cause your assembly to interfere with other applications that may be installed on the same computer. The /codebase switch is intended to be used only with signed assemblies. Please give your assembly a strong name and re-register it.
Types registered successfully
I'm not using a shim if that makes a difference.
How do I sign my add-in so it loads when the user has checked "Require application add-ins to be signed by a trusted publisher"?
Any tips would be appreciated.

Hello,
Why do you need to use the regasm utility from the post-build action?
There is a difference between signing the assembly with a strong name and digital signature. The
How to: Sign an Assembly with a Strong Name article in MSDN explains how to sign an assembly with a strong name (.snk). See
How to digitally sign a strong named assembly for adding a digital signature.
You may also find the
What's the Difference, Part Five: certificate signing vs strong naming article helpful.

How can I check if an user has access to an url within my web app?

Hi,
I have a web application where I allow the users to set their startup page by presenting them a list of startup pages. However, some startup pages can accessed only by certain users, so I want to present the user only those pages the user has access to.
How can I do this with weblogic?
One way is to read the web.xml file and determine the roles that have access to the page, then check whether the user has any of those roles.
Is there a better way eventually using some weblogic api?
Thanks

Just for the record, I decided to parse the web.xml file and to simulate whatever the container does.

How to check if a user has a deferred task or not?

Right now, I use getView and then check for the deferred task as below
1)
<Action id='0' application='com.waveset.session.WorkflowServices'>
<Argument name='op' value='getView'/>
<Argument name='type' value='User'/>
<Argument name='id' value='$(accountId)'/>
</Action>
2)
<Transition to='Add Deferred Task'>
<isnull>
<ref>view.accounts[Lighthouse].properties.tasks[Task Name]</ref>
</isnull>
</Transition>
Is there a quicker way to combine both steps 1 and 2 into one step?

Here's my code
<Action id='0' application='com.waveset.session.WorkflowServices'>
<Argument name='op' value='queryObjectNames'/>
<Argument name='type' value='User'/>
<Argument name='single' value='true'/>
<Argument name='attributes'>
<map>
<s>accountId</s>
<ref>accountId</ref>
<s>deferredTaskDate</s>
<s>Task 123</s>
</map>
</Argument>
</Action>
So I'll pass in 2 parameters, the accountId and a task name. I want to see if this user has that particular task name or not.
In the WF trace, I see this
Argument attributes = {accountId=ABC, deferredTaskDate=Task 123}
queryResult is null because it could not find this user even though user ABC exists in IDM and has a deferred task named Task 123.
Is my code wrong and how do I use AttributeCondition in the queryObjectNames above?

How to check if a user has SAP_ALL in a program?

Hi:
I want to create a program that will check if the user has SAP_ALL. Is there a standard FM or BAPI?. Otherwise, can someone pelase help.
Thank you.
Seshagiri Gopi

Hi,
Please check the below link:
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/BI/AuthorizationinSAPNWBI
Regards,
Nilesh.

Access 2010 checking if a user has opened a zipped rather than expanded database

Is there a property or method that can be used to detect/ check if a user has opened a zipped copy of a database?
I distribute a zipped copy of a database and expect users to extract it before using it but some times a user simply opens the zipped copy and later encounters problems. I would like to display a message notifying the user that they must first expand the
zipped file before opening the database.
phil kelly

Maybe this will help.
Option Compare Database
Option Explicit
'See MSDN for more constants: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms839432.aspx
Const CSIDL_APPDATA = &H16
Const CSIDL_DESKTOP = &H0
Const CSIDL_PROGRAMS = &H2
Const CSIDL_CONTROLS = &H3
Const CSIDL_PRINTERS = &H4
Const CSIDL_PERSONAL = &H5
Const CSIDL_FAVORITES = &H6
Const CSIDL_STARTUP = &H7
Const CSIDL_RECENT = &H8
Const CSIDL_SENDTO = &H9
Const CSIDL_BITBUCKET = &HA
Const CSIDL_STARTMENU = &HB
Const CSIDL_DESKTOPDIRECTORY = &H10
Const CSIDL_DRIVES = &H11
Const CSIDL_NETWORK = &H12
Const CSIDL_NETHOOD = &H13
Const CSIDL_FONTS = &H14
Const CSIDL_TEMPLATES = &H15
Const MAX_PATH = 260
Private Type SHITEMID
cb As Long
abID As Byte
End Type
Private Type ITEMIDLIST
mkid As SHITEMID
End Type
Private Declare Function SHGetSpecialFolderLocation Lib "shell32.dll" (ByVal hwndOwner As Long, ByVal nFolder As Long, pidl As ITEMIDLIST) As Long
Private Declare Function SHGetPathFromIDList Lib "shell32.dll" Alias "SHGetPathFromIDListA" (ByVal pidl As Long, ByVal pszPath As String) As Long
Public Function GetProgramFilesFolder() As String
Const PROGRAM_FILES = &H26&
Dim objShell As Object
Dim objFolder As Object
Dim objFolderItem As Object
Set objShell = CreateObject("Shell.Application")
Set objFolder = objShell.Namespace(PROGRAM_FILES)
Set objFolderItem = objFolder.Self
Debug.Print objFolderItem.Path
End Function
Private Function GetSpecialfolder(CSIDL As Long) As String
Dim r As Long
Dim IDL As ITEMIDLIST
Dim sPath As String
'Get the special folder
r = SHGetSpecialFolderLocation(100, CSIDL, IDL)
If r = 0 Then
'Create a buffer
sPath$ = Space$(512)
'Get the sPath from the IDList
r = SHGetPathFromIDList(ByVal IDL.mkid.cb, ByVal sPath$)
'Remove the unnecessary chr$(0)'s
GetSpecialfolder = Left$(sPath, InStr(sPath, Chr$(0)) - 1)
Exit Function
End If
GetSpecialfolder = ""
End Function
Public Sub PrintSpecFolderPaths()
'KPD-Team 1998
'URL: http://www.allapi.net/
'E-Mail: [email protected]
'Print the folders to the form
Debug.Print "Start menu folder: " & GetSpecialfolder(CSIDL_STARTMENU)
Debug.Print "Favorites folder: " & GetSpecialfolder(CSIDL_FAVORITES)
Debug.Print "Programs folder: " & GetSpecialfolder(CSIDL_PROGRAMS)
Debug.Print "Desktop folder: " & GetSpecialfolder(CSIDL_DESKTOP)
Debug.Print "My Docs folder: " & GetSpecialfolder(CSIDL_PERSONAL)
End Sub
Bill Mosca
www.thatlldoit.com
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MS_Access_Professionals

How to check if a user has a particular role in sql server

Is it possible to check to see if a user has a particular role in sql server? For instance, I need to check to see if the user logging in has wite ability to the database. Thanks in advance.

To answer your question from a Java-perspective, since this is a Java-forum: No.
The JDBC 3.0 specification does not state that the driver has to implement a user credential mechanism.
However, the DriverManager will throw an SQLException if user credentials are not met at all and the Connection should throw you a SQLException when trying to create or execute a statement that you are not alowed to do.

Checking if a user has a role (FGAC)

Hi!
I am implementing Fine Grained Access Control on a table and in my policy function I do not want to restrict the amount of result data on a select if the current user has a certain role (otherwise I want to).
My idea was to check USER_ROLE_PRIVS/ROLE_ROLE_PRIVS for the role, but the stored procedure runs with definer-rights, so that won't help.
Running the procedure with invoker-rights won't help either, since not the current user is the invoker of the policy function but the DB system (user sys?).
And finally, the definer of the policy function does not have DBA privs, so I can't select the DBA_* views to check if the current user has the role.
Is there another way to check if the current user that is known inside the policy function by the USER variable has a certain role?
Thanks for your help!
Marcus

Hi Frank,
thanks for your answer!
Frank Kulash wrote:
Policy functions are run by the user who queries or tries to do DML on the table.I don't see that this is happening. Here's my test case:CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION CU_is_member_of
(v_role IN VARCHAR2) RETURN NUMBER
AUTHID CURRENT_USER
is
v_res VARCHAR2(255);
begin
SELECT COUNT(*)
INTO v_res
FROM
(SELECT GRANTED_ROLE FROM USER_ROLE_PRIVS
UNION
select GRANTED_ROLE from role_role_privs)
WHERE UPPER(GRANTED_ROLE)=UPPER(v_role);
RETURN to_number(v_res);
end;
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION POLIFUNC_PARTTYPES_WRITE
(p_schemaname IN varchar2, p_tablename IN varchar2)
RETURN VARCHAR2
IS
BEGIN
IF USER=p_schemaname
THEN RETURN '';
ELSE
BEGIN
if SYSWM_TOOL.CU_is_member_of('#ACT#WMT_MANAGE_PARTTYPES')=1
THEN RETURN ''; -- *****
ELSE
BEGIN
RETURN '1=0';
END;
end if;
end;
END IF;
END;
CALL SYS.DBMS_RLS.ADD_POLICY('SYSWM_TOOL', 'TBL_PARTTYPES', 'POL_PARTTYPES', 'SYSWM_TOOL', 'POLIFUNC_PARTTYPES_WRITE', 'select'); --TODO: SELECT->UPDATE,INSERT,DELETE
If the policy function is run by the user who queries, then I would expect that a user who has the role querying table TBL_PARTTYPES would see all entries since he would run into the line marked with *****.
SQL> select SYSWM_TOOL.CU_is_member_of('#ACT#WMT_MANAGE_PARTTYPES') FROM DUAL;
SYSWM_TOOL.CU_IS_MEMBER_OF('#ACT#WMT_MANAGE_PARTTYPES')
1
SQL> SELECT COUNT(*)
2 FROM
3 (SELECT GRANTED_ROLE FROM USER_ROLE_PRIVS
4 UNION
5 select GRANTED_ROLE from role_role_privs)
6 WHERE UPPER(GRANTED_ROLE)=UPPER('#ACT#WMT_MANAGE_PARTTYPES');
COUNT(*)
1
So, the current user has the role and the stored function CU_IS_MEMBER_OF works correctly. However:
SQL> select count(*) from syswm_tool.tbl_parttypes;
COUNT(*)
0
What am I missing here?
Marcus

Check if a user has a specific role

Hello,
Is it possible to check if a user has a specific role in MII 12.0?
For example if the user has the role "xmii Developers" I would do something more in a transaction than if the user doesn't have this role.
Thank you for your help.
Regards,
Matthias

Hi Matthias Pröller ,
Are u finding difficulty to trace which role user is assigned to? If so, then u can refer Abesh's Blog.
OR
If you are writing Transaction to get user list based on Role , then u can do following
Create XML query.
Configure above XML Query in Transaction, in links map (XML Query) URL like given below
"https://Server:Port/XMII/Illuminator?service=admin&Mode=UserList&Content-Type=text/xml&group=XMII Administrators&IllumLoginName=loginId&IllumLoginPassword=pwd"
Regards,
Padma
Edited by: Rao on Mar 31, 2009 11:52 AM

How to check if the user has only the display authority of a message

hi,
How to check if the user has only the display authority of a message but does not have the change authority for a certain message?
Best regards,

hi blake
though i am an application consultant and for authorisation u need to have help of BASIS person if u r not the one but still i can guide u regarding the same,
Basically Authorization Management
Use
You can use the following authorization objects to control the authorizations for maintaining business partner data:
        Authorization objects for the Business Partner:
             B_BUPA_GRP
             B_BUPA_ATT
             B_BUPA_FDG
             B_BUPA_RLT
Authorization objects for relationships:
             B_BUPR_BZT
             B_BUPR_FDG
In addition, you can assign an authorization group to a business partner in the dialog. The authorization group controls which users may maintain data for this business partner.
You can also define authorizations for fields and field groups using the Business Data Toolset (BDT). Depending on the settings you have made, the system carries out the relevant authorization checks.
In the dialog in the SAP GUI, you can display an overview of the authorizations assigned to you by pressing the button Settings.
For more information on authorization management, see the Implementation Guide (IMG) of the Business Partner, as well as in the Developers Handbook for the BDT under Authorizations.
IntegrationAuthorization management for the Business Partner forms part of the SAP authorization concept.
Prerequisites
You have made the necessary settings in Customizing of the Business Partner under Basic Settings--> -Address Management.
Moving over
AS ABAP Authorization Concept
The ABAP authorization concept protects transactions, programs, and services in SAP systems from unauthorized access. On the basis of the authorization concept, the administrator assigns authorizations to the users that determine which actions a user can execute in the SAP system, after he or she has logged on to the system and authenticated himself or herself.
To access business objects or execute SAP transactions, a user requires corresponding authorizations, as business objects or transactions are protected by authorization objects. The authorizations represent instances of generic authorization objects and are defined depending on the activity and responsibilities of the employee. The authorizations are combined in an authorization profile that is associated with a role. The user administrators then assign the corresponding roles using the user master record, so that the user can use the appropriate transactions for his or her tasks.
Authorization Checks
To ensure that a user has the appropriate authorizations when he or she performs an action, users are subject to authorization checks.
The following actions are subject to authorization checks that are performed before the start of a program or table maintenance and which the SAP applications cannot avoid:
        Starting SAP transactions (authorization object S_TCODE)
        Starting reports (authorization object S_PROGRAM)
        Calling RFC function modules (authorization object S_RFC)
        Table maintenance with generic tools (S_TABU_DIS)
Checking at Program Level with AUTHORITY-CHECK
Applications use the ABAP statement AUTHORITY-CHECK, which is inserted in the source code of the program, to check whether users have the appropriate authorization and whether these authorizations are suitably defined; that is, whether the user administrator has assigned the values required for the fields by the programmer. In this way, you can also protect transactions that are called indirectly by other programs.
AUTHORITY-CHECK searches profiles specified in the user master record to see whether the user has authorization for the authorization object specified in the AUTHORITY-CHECK. If one of the authorizations found matches the required values, the check is successful.
Starting SAP Transactions
When a user starts a transaction, the system performs the following checks:
        The system checks in table TSTC whether the transaction code is valid and whether the system administrator has locked the transaction.
        The system then checks whether the user has authorization to start the transaction.
The SAP system performs the authorization checks every time a user starts a transaction from the menu or by entering a command. Indirectly called transactions are not included in this authorization check. For more complex transactions, which call other transactions, there are additional authorization checks.
             The authorization object S_TCODE (transaction start) contains the field TCD (transaction code). The user must have an authorization with a value for the selected transaction code.
             If an additional authorization is entered using transaction SE93 for the transaction to be started, the user also requires the suitable defined authorization object (TSTA, table TSTCA).
If you create a transaction in transaction SE93, you can assign an additional authorization to this transaction. This is useful, if you want to be able to protect a transaction with a separate authorization. If this is not the case, you should consider using other methods to protect the transaction (such as AUTHORITY-CHECK at program level).
        The system checks whether the transaction code is assigned an authorization object. If so, a check is made that the user has authorization for this authorization object.
The check is not performed in the following cases:
You have deactivated the check of the authorization objects for the transaction (with transaction SU24) using check indicators, that is, you have removed an authorization object entered using transaction SE93. You cannot deactivate the check for objects from the SAP NetWeaver and HR areas.
This can be useful, as a large number of authorization objects are often checked when transactions are executed, since the transaction calls other work areas in the background. In order for these checks to be executed successfully, the user in question must have the appropriate authorizations. This results in some users having more authorization than they strictly need. It also leads to an increased maintenance workload. You can therefore deactivate authorization checks of this type in a targeted manner using transaction SU24.
             You have globally deactivated authorization objects for all transactions with transaction SU24 or transaction SU25.
             So that the entries that you have made with transactions SU24 and SU25 become effective, you must set the profile parameter AUTH/NO_CHECK_IN_SOME_CASES to Y (using transaction RZ10).
All of the above checks must be successful so that the user can start the transaction. Otherwise, the transaction is not called and the system displays an appropriate message.
Starting Report Classes
You can perform additional authorization checks by assigning reports to authorization classes (using report RSCSAUTH). You can, for example, assign all PA* reports to an authorization class for PA (such as PAxxx). If a user wants to start a PA report, he or she requires the appropriate authorization to execute reports in this class.
We do not deliver any predefined report classes. You must decide yourself which reports you want to protect in this way. You can also enter the authorization classes for reports with the maintenance functions for report trees. This method provides a hierarchical approach for assigning authorizations for reports. You can, for example, assign an authorization class to a report node, meaning that all reports at this node automatically belong to this class. This means that you have a more transparent overview of the authorization classes to which the various reports are transported.
You must consider the following:
              After you have assigned reports to authorization classes or have changed assignments, you may have to adjust objects in your authorization concept (such as roles (activity groups), profiles, or user master records).
              There are certain system reports that you cannot assign to any authorization class. These include:
              RSRZLLG0
              STARTMEN (as of SAP R/3 4.0)
              Reports that are called using SUBMIT in a customer exit at logon (such as SUSR0001, ZXUSRU01).
              Authorization assignments for reports are overwritten during an upgrade. After an upgrade, you must therefore restore your customer-specific report authorizations.
Calling RFC Function Modules
When RFC function modules are called by an RFC client program or another system, an authorization check is performed for the authorization object S_RFC in the called system. This check uses the name of the function group to which the function module belongs. You can deactivate this check with parameter auth/rfc_authority_check.
Checking Assignment of Authorization Groups to Tables
You can also assign authorization groups to tables to avoid users accessing tables using general access tools (such as transaction SE16). A user requires not only authorization to execute the tool, but must also have authorization to be permitted to access tables with the relevant group assignments. For this case, we deliver tables with predefined assignments to authorization groups. The assignments are defined in table TDDAT; the checked authorization object is S_TABU_DIS.
You can assign a table to authorization group Z000. (Use transaction SM30 for table TDDAT) A user that wants to access this table must have authorization object S_TABU_DIS in his or her profile with the value Z000 in the field DICBERCLS (authorization group for ABAP Dictionary objects).
please See also:
        SAP Notes 7642, 20534, 23342, 33154, and 67766
guess this info will help you,there is one graphic which actually explain the hierarchy of authorisation,i will find some time out to let u know more info about the authorisation
but if u sit with ur BASIS guy then u can learn lot of things in PFCG
i guess u r a basis guy,then its not a problem
best regards
ashish

How to get the dates a user has logged into the portal??

I need to know all the times and the dates a user has loggin to the portal? Do you know any way to do this? I was trying to use "successfullogoncount" from UME_STRING of the PCD database but it doesn't say anything about the dates. I also try to use "lastsuccessfulllogon" from the sama table but, as the name says, it just give me the last date of logon... Please help!!!

Hi Pablo,
probably you could work with Portal activity reports.
This can generate reports on activity in the portal, either reports on how many users were logged on to the portal or reports on the most popular pages and iViews.
look out on this weblog at
https://www.sdn.sap.com/sdn/weblogs.sdn?blog=/pub/wlg/1242. [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
From this you can know which user has logged on at which date and time.
If you are not looking for Portal activity reports try this:
You can get this information in the Visual Administrator of the J2EE Engine.
Goto Security Provider Service -> Runtime -> Login (Sessions).
This would return a table showing the users along with the logging in start date&time, (if logged out) log out date&time, user-Ids, etc.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Uma.
Message was edited by: Uma Thirugnanam

User has deleted checked out files

A user has deleted the local roboholp project folder with checked out files. (Robohelp HTML Version 9.0)
The files are published as a webpage so the content is in HTML files - is there a way to get the content back in Robohelp?
And how can I check-in her files (there is not option in Source Control (Version 3.1.), although I have administrative rights)
Thanks for any help.

Hi there
Not sure about RoboSource Control, but typically a source control application allows one to "Get latest version". The files should still be in the source control database, albeit with a status of "checked out". So you should be able to recover the project by simply getting the latest version. Not sure about how to go about forcing a check in from the user account that is no longer there.
Cheers... Rick

Webdynpro - Check if a portal user has a user in R/3 Backend

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for