Weird behaviour while inserting in a table

Hi All,
I am coming across a wierd problem.
We are using Oracle 10.2.0.3.0.
There is a collection system where by we give snapshot of the entire database in a pre-requisite format.
Recently a strange thing is happenning.
When we try to insert into a table data for 3 Lac individual (1 row per customer shud be inserted) customers from 12 different tables, it inserts more than 4 million rows.
Another observation is that for one account there are 39,98,300 rows and rest has data for some customers and not all.
When i printed the count of the select query, it returned exactly 3 Lac rows.
But when i run the proc from SQL prompt, it inserted exactly 3 Lac rows.
Has anyone come across such a problem.
Thanks in advance.
Ameya.

Ameya wrote:
I am coming across a wierd problem.Problems are always weird,interesting etc until you know how to fix them.
Recently a strange thing is happenning.Since when, was there a change in your code, table re-org, some objects/code dropped etc.
When we try to insert into a table data for 3 Lac individual (1 row per customer shud be inserted) customers from 12 different tables, it inserts more than 4 million rows.How do you define individual customer, do you have unique constraint on the table, what is your business rule for unique customer identification etc.?
Does your 12 different tables same structure or 12 different structures.
What process inserts data - list the code.
Another observation is that for one account there are 39,98,300 rows and rest has data for some customers and not all.
When i printed the count of the select query, it returned exactly 3 Lac rows.Your code ?
But when i run the proc from SQL prompt, it inserted exactly 3 Lac rows.can you recreate problem using some sample representative code.
SS

Similar Messages

Problem while inserting into a table which has ManyToOne relation

Problem while inserting into a table *(Files)* which has ManyToOne relation with another table *(Folder)* involving a attribute both in primary key as well as in foreign key in JPA 1.0.
Relevent Code
Entities:
public class Files implements Serializable {
@EmbeddedId
protected FilesPK filesPK;
private String filename;
@JoinColumns({
@JoinColumn(name = "folder_id", referencedColumnName = "folder_id"),
@JoinColumn(name = "uid", referencedColumnName = "uid", insertable = false, updatable = false)})
@ManyToOne(optional = false)
private Folders folders;
public class FilesPK implements Serializable {
private int fileId;
private int uid;
public class Folders implements Serializable {
@EmbeddedId
protected FoldersPK foldersPK;
private String folderName;
@OneToMany(cascade = CascadeType.ALL, mappedBy = "folders")
private Collection<Files> filesCollection;
@JoinColumn(name = "uid", referencedColumnName = "uid", insertable = false, updatable = false)
@ManyToOne(optional = false)
private Users users;
public class FoldersPK implements Serializable {
private int folderId;
private int uid;
public class Users implements Serializable {
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
private Integer uid;
private String username;
@OneToMany(cascade = CascadeType.ALL, mappedBy = "users")
private Collection<Folders> foldersCollection;
I left out @Basic & @Column annotations for sake of less code.
EJB method
public void insertFile(String fileName, int folderID, int uid){
FilesPK pk = new FilesPK();
pk.setUid(uid);
Files file = new Files();
file.setFilename(fileName);
file.setFilesPK(pk);
FoldersPK folderPk = new FoldersPK(folderID, uid);
// My understanding that it should automatically handle folderId in files table,
// but it is not…
file.setFolders(em.find(Folders.class, folderPk));
em.persist(file);
It is giving error:
Internal Exception: java.sql.SQLException: Field 'folderid' doesn't have a default value_
Error Code: 1364
Call: INSERT INTO files (filename, uid, fileid) VALUES (?, ?, ?)_
_ bind => [hello.txt, 1, 0]_
It is not even considering folderId while inserting into db.
However it works fine when I add folderId variable in Files entity and changed insertFile like this:
public void insertFile(String fileName, int folderID, int uid){
FilesPK pk = new FilesPK();
pk.setUid(uid);
Files file = new Files();
file.setFilename(fileName);
file.setFilesPK(pk);
file.setFolderId(folderId) // added line
FoldersPK folderPk = new FoldersPK(folderID, uid);
file.setFolders(em.find(Folders.class, folderPk));
em.persist(file);
My question is that is this behavior expected or it is a bug.
Is it required to add "column_name" variable separately even when an entity has reference to ManyToOne mapping foreign Entity ?
I used Mysql 5.1 for database, then generate entities using toplink, JPA 1.0, glassfish v2.1.
I've also tested this using eclipselink and got same error.
Please provide some pointers.
Thanks

Hello,
What version of EclipseLink did you try? This looks like bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=280436 that was fixed in EclipseLink 2.0, so please try a later version.
You can also try working around the problem by making both fields writable through the reference mapping.
Best Regards,
Chris

Deadlock issue in while inserting in oracle table.

I have written a procedure which copy data in to oracle tables.Other user can also start inserting in that table so to prevent these intervention.
i have applied locks on these two tables and assume that my procedure will wait for other users to finish and it will apply lock on the tables and other users will now wait till this procedure finishes.
My Procedure looks like:--
lock table table1 in exclusive mode;
lock table table2 in exclusive mode;
update table1 set where rownum < x;
forall .....insert in table 2.
commit;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
dbms_printline(SQLERRM)
commit;
END;
But my problem is i am still receiving oracle error as below and the above procedure fails in between:-
ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
Any hint ??
Can we get this error if i execute a SELECT statement on some table which is not locked by me and some other other is updating/deletig/inserting in that table ?
*Select statement is without update clause.

user620101 wrote:
I have written a procedure which copy data in to oracle tables.Other user can also start inserting in that table so to prevent these intervention.
i have applied locks on these two tables and assume that my procedure will wait for other users to finish and it will apply lock on the tables and other users will now wait till this procedure finishes.
My Procedure looks like:--
lock table table1 in exclusive mode;
lock table table2 in exclusive mode;
update table1 set where rownum < x;
forall .....insert in table 2.
commit;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
dbms_printline(SQLERRM)
commit;
END;
But my problem is i am still receiving oracle error as below and the above procedure fails in between:-
ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
Any hint ??But if you successfully lock TABLE1 (in session #1) and another session (session #2) is holding a lock against TABLE2 (say it's currently updating a row) then session #1 has to wait when you issue the Lock table command for table2. So session #1 is waiting, and then session #2 tries to do ANY modification to TABLE1 (which session #1 still has locked, and is still waiting to obtain the lock on TABLE2)... whamo, deadlock.
user620101 wrote:
Can we get this error if i execute a SELECT statement on some table which is not locked by me and some other other is updating/deletig/inserting in that table ?
*Select statement is without update clause.No, writes (and locks) do not block reads. So a simple select statement (unless you issued a FOR UPDATE clause) would not cause this issue.
What does your actual code look like, and what are you actually attempting to do? Why do you think you need to lock the tables, is this a one time operation, a continual operation of the system? Please explain in much more detail what you've got going on here.

ORA-00600: internal error code while inserting data in table

hi gems..
i am getting the below error while inserting data in a table...
*ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kqd-objerror$ ] , , [0], [98], [BIN$sm1O+fYhF1jgRAAhKNYyZA==$0], [], [], [], [], [], [], []*
i can select the table absolutely but cant insert datas(but this is the schema owner and so datas should get inserted)
i have checked the alert.log...the entries in last few lines are like this:
<msg time='2011-11-25T03:08:55.763+05:30' org_id='oracle' comp_id='clients'
type='UNKNOWN' level='16' host_id='ICS167DOR'
host_addr='10.184.134.139'>
<txt>Directory does not exist for read/write [oracle/ora11g/app/ora11g/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/log] [oracle/ora11g/app/ora11g/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/log/diag/clients]
</txt>
</msg>
please help...thanks in advance
Edited by: user12780416 on Nov 25, 2011 3:29 AM

hi...
finally i got the solution...i know that this problem may occur due to some other reasons also for different users...but the problem which caused the developers facing the error in this case is below:
they faced the error while importing the dumps in the server. at the same time the application developers told that they can select the tables but cannot insert any datas.
after listenning to this, i assumed that this may be a space problem with the system tablespace as it is responsible for storing the data dictionary.
i asked for the free spaces for the system tablespace and got the reason. It has only 0.2% left.
i told them to issue the resize command for the system01.dbf datafile(allocated 2GB more) and the problem got resolved.
Hope this helps..thanks

Taking More Time while inserting into the table (With foriegn key)

Hi All,
I am facing problem while inserting the values into the master table.
The problem,
Table A -- User Master Table (Reg No, Name, etc)
Table B -- Transaction Table (Foreign key reference with Table A).
While inserting the data's in Table B, i need to insert the reg no also in table B which is mandatory. I followed the logic which is mentioned in the SRDemo.
While inserting we need to query the Table A first to have the values in TableABean.java.
final TableA tableA= (TableA )uow.executeQuery("findUser",TableA .class, regNo);
Then, we need to create the instance for TableB
TableB tableB= (TableB)uow.newInstance(TableB.class);
tableB.setID(bean.getID);
tableA.addTableB(tableB); --- this is for to insert the regNo of TableA in TableB.. This line is executing the query "select * from TableB where RegNo = <tableA.getRegNo>".
This query is taking too much time if values are more in the TableB for that particular registrationNo. Because of this its taking more time to insert into the TableB.
For Ex: TableA -- regNo : 101...having less entry in TableB means...inserting record is taking less than 1 sec
regNo : 102...having more entry in TableB means...inserting record is taking more than 2 sec
Time delay is there for different users when they enter transaction in TableB.
I need to avoid this since in future it will take more time...from 2 sec to 10 sec, if volume of data increases mean.
Please help me to resolve this issue...I am facing it now in production.
Thanks & Regards
VB

Hello,
Looks like you have a 1:M relationship from TableA to TableB, with a 1:1 back pointer from TableB to TableA. If triggering the 1:M relationship is causing you delays that you want to avoid there might be two quick ways I can see:
1) Don't map it. Leave the TableA->TableB 1:M unmapped, and instead just query for relationship when you do need it. This means you do not need to call tableA.addTableB(tableB), and instead only need to call tableB.setTableA(tableA), so that the TableB->TableA relation gets set. Might not be the best option, but it depends on your application's usage. It does allow you to potentially page the TableB results or add other query query performance options when you do need the data though.
2) You are currently using Lazy loading for the TableA->TableB relationship - if it is untriggered, don't bother calling tableA.addTableB(tableB), and instead only need to call tableB.setTableA(tableA). This of course requires using TopLink api to a) verify the collection is an IndirectCollection type, and b) that it is hasn't been triggered. If it has been triggered, you will still need to call tableA.addTableB(tableB), but it won't result in a query. Check out the oracle.toplink.indirection.IndirectContainer class and it's isInstantiated() method. This can cause problems though in highly concurrent environments, as other threads may have triggered the indirection before you commit your transaction, so that the A->B collection is not up to date - this might require refreshing the TableA if so.
Change tracking would probably be the best option to use here, and is described in the EclipseLink wiki:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Introduction_to_EclipseLink_Transactions_(ELUG)#Attribute_Change_Tracking_Policy
Best Regards,
Chris

Avoiding duplicate records while inserting into the table

Hi
I tried the following insert statement , where i want to avoid the duplicate records while inserting itself
but giving me the errror like invalid identifier, though the column exists in the table
Please let me know Where i'm doing the mistake.
INSERT INTO t_map tm(sn_id,o_id,txt,typ,sn_time)
   SELECT 100,
          sk.obj_id,
          sk.key_txt,
          sk.obj_typ,
          sysdate,
          FROM S_KEY sk
    WHERE     sk.obj_typ = 'AY'
          AND SYSDATE BETWEEN sk.start_date AND sk.end_date
          AND sk.obj_id IN (100170,1001054)
           and   not exists (select 1
                                                               FROM t_map tm1 where tm1.O_ID=tm.o_id
                                                                    and tm1.sn_id=tm.sn_id
                                                                    and tm1.txt=tm.txt
                                                                    and tm1.typ=tm.typ
                                                                    and tm1.sn_time=tm.sn_time )

Then
you have to join the table with alias tml where is that ?do you want like this?
INSERT INTO t_map tm(sn_id,o_id,txt,typ,sn_time)
   SELECT 100,
          sk.obj_id,
          sk.key_txt,
          sk.obj_typ,
          sysdate,
          FROM S_KEY sk
    WHERE     sk.obj_typ = 'AY'
          AND SYSDATE BETWEEN sk.start_date AND sk.end_date
          AND sk.obj_id IN (100170,1001054)
           and   not exists (select 1
                                                               FROM t_map tm where sk.obj_ID=tm.o_id
                                                                    and 100=tm.sn_id
                                                                    and sk.key_txt=tm.txt
                                                                    and sk.obj_typ=tm.typ
                                                                    and sysdate=tm.sn_time )

Sporadically getting error "string or binary data would be truncated" in SQL server 2008 while inserting in a Table Type object

I am facing a strange SQL exception:-
The code flow is like this:
.Net 4.0 --> Entity Framework --> SQL 2008 ( StoredProc --> Function {Exception})
In the SQL Table-Valued Function, I am selecting a column (nvarchar(50)) from an existing table and (after some filtration using inner joins and where clauses) inserting the values in a Table Type Object having a column (nvarchar(50))
This flow was working fine in SQL 2008 but now all of sudden the Insert into @TableType is throwing  "string or binary data would be truncated" exception.
Insert Into @ObjTableType
Select * From dbo.Table
The max length of data in the source column is 24 but even then the insert statement into nvarchar temp column is failing.
Moreover, the same issue started coming up few weeks back and I was unable to find the root cause, but back then it started working properly after few hours
(issue reported at 10 AM EST and was automatically resolved post 8 PM EST). No refresh activity was performed on the database.
This time however the issue is still coming up (even after 2 days) but is not coming up in every scenario. The data set, for which the error is thrown, is valid and every value in the function is fetched from existing tables.
Due to its sporadic nature, I am unable to recreate it now :( , but still unable to determine why it started coming up or how can i prevent such things to happen again.
It is difficult to even explain the weirdness of this bug but any help or guidance in finding the root cause will be very helpful.
I also Tried by using nvarchar(max) in the table type object but it didn't work.
Here is a code similar to the function which I am using:
BEGIN
TRAN
DECLARE @PID
int = 483
DECLARE @retExcludables
TABLE
    PID
int NOT
NULL,
    ENumber
nvarchar(50)
NOT NULL,
    CNumber
nvarchar(50)
NOT NULL,
    AId
uniqueidentifier NOT
NULL
declare @PSCount int;
select @PSCount =
count('x')
from tblProjSur ps
where ps.PID
= @PID;
if (@PSCount = 0)
begin
return;
end;
declare @ExcludableTempValue table (
        PID
int,
        ENumber
nvarchar(max),
        CNumber
nvarchar(max),
        AId
uniqueidentifier,
        SIds
int,
        SCSymb
nvarchar(10),
        SurCSymb
nvarchar(10)
with SurCSymbs as (
select ps.PID,
               ps.SIds,
               csl.CSymb
from tblProjSur ps
            right
outer join tblProjSurCSymb pscs
on pscs.tblProjSurId
= ps.tblProjSurId
inner join CSymbLookup csl
on csl.CSymbId
= pscs.CSymbId
where ps.PID
= @PID
    AssignedValues
as (
select psr.PID,
               psr.ENumber,
               psr.CNumber,
               psmd.MetaDataValue
as ClaimSymbol,
               psau.UserId
as AId,
               psus.SIds
from PSRow psr
inner join PSMetadata psmd
on psmd.PSRowId
= psr.SampleRowId
inner join MetaDataLookup mdl
on mdl.MetaDataId
= psmd.MetaDataId
inner join PSAUser psau
on psau.PSRowId
= psr.SampleRowId
            inner
join PSUserSur psus
on psus.SampleAssignedUserId
= psau.ProjectSampleUserId
where psr.PID
= @PID
and mdl.MetaDataCommonName
= 'CorrectValue'
and psus.SIds
in (select
distinct SIds from SurCSymbs)
    FullDetails
as (
select asurv.PID,
Convert(NVarchar(50),asurv.ENumber)
as ENumber,
Convert(NVarchar(50),asurv.CNumber)
as CNumber,
               asurv.AId,
               asurv.SIds,
               asurv.CSymb
as SCSymb,
               scs.CSymb
as SurCSymb
from AssignedValues asurv
left outer
join SurCSymbs scs
on    scs.PID
= asurv.PID
and scs.SIds
= asurv.SIds
and scs.CSymb
= asurv.CSymb
--Error is thrown at this statement
insert into @ExcludableTempValue
select *
from FullDetails;
with SurHavingSym as (
select distinct est.PID,
                        est.ENumber,
                        est.CNumber,
                        est.AId
from @ExcludableTempValue est
where est.SurCSymb
is not
null
delete @ExcludableTempValue
from @ExcludableTempValue est
inner join SurHavingSym shs
on    shs.PID
= est.PID
and shs.ENumber
= est.ENumber
and shs.CNumber
= est.CNumber
and shs.AId
= est.AId;
insert @retExcludables(PID, ENumber, CNumber, AId)
select distinct est.PID,
Convert(nvarchar(50),est.ENumber)
ENumber,
Convert(nvarchar(50),est.CNumber)
CNumber,
                        est.AId
from @ExcludableTempValue est
RETURN
ROLLBACK
TRAN
I have tried by converting the columns and also validated the input data set for any white spaces or special characters.
For the same input data, it was working fine till yesterday but suddenly it started throwing the exception.

Remember, the CTE isn't executing the SQL exactly in the order you read it as a human (don't get too picky about that statement, it's at least partly true enough to say it's partly true), nor are the line numbers or error messages easy to read: a mismatch
in any of the joins along the way leading up to your insert could be the cause too. I would suggest posting the table definition/DDL for:
- PSMetadata, in particular PSRowID, but just post it all
- tblProjectSur, in particularcolumns CSymbID and TblProjSurSurID
- cSymbLookup, in particular column CSymbID
- PSRow, in particular columns SampleRowID, PID,
- PSAuser and PSUserSur, in particualr all the USERID and RowID columns
- SurCSymbs, in particular colum SIDs
Also, a diagnostic query along these lines, repeat for each of your tables, each of the columns used in joins leading up to your insert:
Select count(asurv.sid) as count all
, count(case when asurv.sid between 0 and 9999999999 then 1 else null end) as ctIsaNumber
from SurvCsymb
The sporadic nature would imply that the optimizer usually chooses one path to the data, but sometimes others, and the fact that it occurs during the insert could be irrelevant, any of the preceding joins could be the cause, not the data targeted to be inserted.

Poblem with java.sql.Date while inserting to a table

Hi All,
I have a PostgreSQL database table which contains fields(columns ) of type date. I want to insert values to the table in the[b] �dd-MMM-YYYY� format using the prepared statement.
My code is as follows
java.text.DateFormat dateFormatter =new java.text.SimpleDateFormat("dd-MMM-yyyy");
String formatedDate=dateFormatter.format(theDate);
currentDate = new java.sql.Date(dateFormatter.parse(formatedDate).getTime())
��
��
��
pst.setDate(12,currentDate);The problem is the currentDate variable gives date only in the �YYYY-MMM-dd� format but requirement is the currentDate variable should give date in the �dd-MMM-YYYY� format and this should be save to table as java.sql.Date type
There is any solution???? please help me...
Thanks and Regards,
Hyson_05

Hi,
What are you talking about? A Date does always wrap a millisecond value, and doesn't have any formatting. It's the database, or your program which formats the date that you see.
In short. You should format the value when you print it, and not when you store it.
Kaj

Error While Inserting Data into table using OAF

Hi Experts,
I am learning OAF; i am trying into insert the data into table using OAF. I followed the below procedure.
My table(OLF_TEST_TBL) Columns:
EmpID (Number), Ename(VARCHAR2 100), Sal Number, and who columns.
1. created Application Module (AM).
package: oracle.apps.mfg.simplepg.server
name: oaf_test_tbl_am
2. created simple page
name:EmployeePG
package:oracle.apps.mfg.simplepg.webui
3. Assigned the Application Module to Page
4. Created Entity Object(EO)
name:oaf_test_tbl_eo
package:oracle.apps.mfg.simplepg.schema.server
schema:apps
table:OLF_TEST_TBL
note:
1. EMPID column is selected as primary key
2. selected create method, remove method and validation method.
3.checked generate default view object
VO:
name:olf_test_tbl_vo
note: Entity Object was assigned to VO
Coming To page:
page main region:EmployeeMainRN
1.under main region i created one more region using wizard
selected AM and VO, region style-default single column
2. under main region i created one more region
region style- pagebuttonbar, ID:pagebutoonsRN
3. under pagebuttonRN, created two submit buttons(ID:SUBMIT, ID:CANCEL).
In AM java page:
created a method to insert row and for commit.
Insert Method:
public void insertrow(){
OAViewObject vo=(OAViewObject)getoaf_test_tbl_vo1();
if(!vo.isPreparedForExecution()){
vo.executeQuery();
Row row=vo.createRow();
vo.insertRow(row);
row.setNewRowState(Row.STATUS_INITIALIZED);
Commit Method:
public void savaDataTooaftesttable(){
getDBTransaction().commit();
In EmployeeMainRN, created a controller.
In this controller process request method, 'insertrow' method was called.
import oracle.apps.fnd.framework.OAApplicationModule;
public void processRequest(OAPageContext pageContext, OAWebBean webBean)
super.processRequest(pageContext, webBean);
if (!pageContext.isFormSubmission())
OAApplicationModule am = pageContext.getApplicationModule(webBean);
am.invokeMethod("insertrow");
To commit the transaction when SUBMIT button pressed, commit method was called in process form request method.
import oracle.apps.fnd.framework.OAViewObject;
public void processformRequest(OAPageContext pageContext, OAWebBean webBean)
super.processFormRequest(pageContext, webBean);
OAApplicationModule am = pageContext.getApplicationModule(webBean);
if (pageContext.getParameter("SUBMIT") != null)
am.invokemethod("savaDataTooaftesttable");
Error After clicking the submit button_
I ran the page, page was opened successfully. Once i enter data and click submit button, it's giving the following error.
The requested page contains stale data. This error could have been caused through the use of the browser's navigation buttons (the browser Back button, for example). If the browser's navigation buttons were not used, this error could have been caused by coding mistakes in application code. Please check Supporting the Browser Back Button developer guide - View Object Primary Key Comparison section to review the primary causes of this error and correct the coding mistakes.
Cause:
The view object oaf_test_tbl_am.oaf_test_tbl_vo1700_oaf_test_tbl_vo1_practice_test_prc1_oracle_apps_mfg_simplepg_server_oaf_test_tbl_am.oaf_test_tbl_vo1 contained no record. The displayed records may have been deleted, or the current record for the view object may not have been properly initialized.
To proceed, please select the Home link at the top of the application page to return to the main menu. Then, access this page again using the application's navigation controls (menu, links, and so on) instead of using the browser's navigation controls like Back and Forward.
Experts, Kindly help me why i am getting this error.
Awating your replies.
Thanks in advance.

If you dont want to create message. You can throw exception like below as well
throw new OAException("Emp Id is "+empId+" and employee name is "+empName, OAException.CONFIRMATION);Thanks
--Anil

Error while insert data using execute immediate in dynamic table in oracle

Error while insert data using execute immediate in dynamic table created in oracle 11g .
first the dynamic nested table (op_sample) was created using the executed immediate...
object is
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE ASI.sub_mark AS OBJECT (
mark1 number,
mark2 number
t_sub_mark is a class of type sub_mark
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE ASI.t_sub_mark is table of sub_mark;
create table sam1(id number,name varchar2(30));
nested table is created below:
begin
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE ' create table '||op_sample||'
(id number,name varchar2(30),subject_obj t_sub_mark) nested table subject_obj store as nest_tab return as value';
end;
now data from sam1 table and object (subject_obj) are inserted into the dynamic table
declare
subject_obj t_sub_mark;
begin
subject_obj:= t_sub_mark();
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'insert into op_sample (select id,name,subject_obj from sam1) ';
end;
and got the below error:
ORA-00904: "SUBJECT_OBJ": invalid identifier
ORA-06512: at line 7
then when we tried to insert the data into the dynam_table with the subject_marks object as null,we received the following error..
execute immediate 'insert into '||dynam_table ||'
(SELECT

887684 wrote:
ORA-00904: "SUBJECT_OBJ": invalid identifier
ORA-06512: at line 7The problem is that your variable subject_obj is not in scope inside the dynamic SQL you are building. The SQL engine does not know your PL/SQL variable, so it tries to find a column named SUBJECT_OBJ in your SAM1 table.
If you need to use dynamic SQL for this, then you must bind the variable. Something like this:
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'insert into op_sample (select id,name,:bind_subject_obj from sam1) ' USING subject_obj;Alternatively you might figure out to use static SQL rather than dynamic SQL (if possible for your project.) In static SQL the PL/SQL engine binds the variables for you automatically.

Getting Error While inserting a record in table PDSNR through Tcode PA30

Hi Experts,
Im doing a transaction in TCode PA30 by entering a pernr and infty as 14 and wage type.
My need is when im entering a particular wage type in PA30 with infotype 14 , for that particular wage type and infotype i need to assign a different cost centre. This requirement was doing now manually by changing the cost centre form EDIT - > Maintain Cost Assignment.
But my Client Needs to do it automatically. by comparing the wage type and infotype the cost centre needs to get automatically updated.
So i use the Enhancement EXIT_SAPFP50M_002 * INCLUDE ZXPADU02.* and wrote coding like below
CASE innnn-infty.
To check whether the record belong to pa0014
If so,check the wage type for the updation
If so update the values of cost center assignments in the table assob and asshe
when '0014'.
if innnn-subty eq '2211'.
Select the last updated sequence number in the table pdsnr
if sy-ucomm eq 'UPD' or sy-ucomm eq 'INS'.
select single * from pa0001 into wa_0001 where pernr eq INNNN-pernr and
                                               endda eq '99991231'.
if sy-subrc = 0.
call function 'ENQUEUE_EPPRELE'
EXPORTING
   MODE_PREL            = 'E'
   MANDT                = SY-MANDT
   PERNR                = INNNN-pernr
   INFTY                = INNNN-INFTY
   SUBTY                = INNNN-SUBTY
EXCEPTIONS
   FOREIGN_LOCK         = 1
   SYSTEM_FAILURE       = 2
   OTHERS               = 3
if sy-subrc <> 0.
MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
        WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
endif.
CLEAR : lv_pdsnr.
select MAX( pdsnr ) from pdsnr into lv_pdsnr.
lv_pdsnr = lv_pdsnr + 1.
    ls_assob-pdsnr = lv_pdsnr.
    ls_assob-pernr = INNNN-pernr.
    ls_assob-bukrs = wa_0001-bukrs. "'1001'.
    ls_assob-gsber = wa_0001-gsber. "'0001'.
    ls_assob-kokrs = wa_0001-kokrs. "'1000'.
    ls_assob-kostl = '1-1361'.
    ls_asshr-pdsnr = lv_pdsnr.
    ls_asshr-pernr = INNNN-pernr.
    ls_asshr-infty = innnn-infty.
    ls_asshr-subty = innnn-subty.
    ls_asshr-begda = sy-datum.
    ls_asshr-endda = '99991231'.
    ls_PDSNR-pdsnr = lv_pdsnr.
    ls_PDSNR-PDGRP = '5B'.
insert into pdsnr values ls_pdsnr.
insert into asshr values ls_asshr.
insert into assob VALUES ls_assob.
call function 'DEQUEUE_EPPRELE'
EXPORTING
   MODE_PREL       = 'E'
   MANDT           = SY-MANDT
   PERNR           = INNNN-pernr
   INFTY           = INNNN-INFTY
   SUBTY           = INNNN-SUBTY.
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
COMMIT WORK.
ENDCASE.
This is to update the three tables PDSNR, ASSOB,ASSHR.
Its getting Updated correctly, But when i goto EDIT - > Maintain Cost Assignment to do some changes and while saving the data i get the following Error Message :
You Cannot insert data in table : PDSNR.
Message no. P2715
Can Anyone please suggest me how to solve this issue.
Thanks,
Vijayan.R

Hi. Were you able to fix the error?

Issue while insert and update data to DB tables

Hello all,
i am having an issue while insert the data to DB table.
my scenario is DB1 to DB2. i had a sender channel with select query which fetches data from DB1 and inserts to DB2.
so the select query will fetch the records that were INSERTED to DB1 and records that were UPDATED to DB1 and needs to insert/update to DB2 table.
Now the issue is i am able to insert the records but not able toupdate the records to DB2 table due to primary key issue.
im message mapping
sender message type is as follows:
<src_message1>
----<row>
-------<fieldA>
-------<filedB>
-------<filedC>
Receiver message type as follows:
<trgt_message1>
----<STATEMENT_1>
----<TABLE_NAME>
----<ACTION> INSERT
----<TABLE>
----<ACCESS>
----<field1> primary key
----<field2>
----<field3>
----<field4>
----<KEY>
----<field1>
----<field2>
----<field3>
----<field4>
my query in sender channel is : select filedA, filedB, filedC from test_table where createdate=sysdate or updatedate=sysdate
so it feteches the data from DB1 and inserting to DB2 but not updating the records to DB2 due to primarykey issue.
please suggest how to solve ....will it solve by using UPDATE_INSERT for action?
Best Regards,SARAN

Hi Nagarjuna,
i have done the following changes to target mapping structure;
1. action as UPDATE_INSERT
2. in access tab, i had mapped fieldDate to field4.
3. in Key tab, i assigned the sysdate to field4.
but issue still exist. could you please check my above changes are correct or not. if wrong please provide me the details that needs to be done.
thanks in advance.
i'm providing the error details again:
my query in sender channel is : select filedA, filedB, filedC, FiledDate from TEST_TABLE where fieldDate=sysdate or updatedate=sysdate
it returns 4 records as follows:
fieldA--fieldB-fieldC---fieldDate
1001----EU---- 1----
    2011-11-10
1002----CN---- 0----
     2011-11-10
1003----AP---- 1----
      2008-03-15 (already exist in DB2)
1004----JP---- 1----
    2007-04-12 (already exist in DB2)
the first two records are created today and remaining 2 records are updated the fieldC from 0 to 1 ( in DB1 )
while inserting these 4 records to DB2, we get the following error "java.sql.SQLException: ORA-00001: unique constraint (data.TEST_TABLE_PK) violated" .
Best Regards,SARAN

Access issues while inserting data in a table in same schema

Hi All.
I have a script that at first creates and then populates a table. My script used to run fine in production environment till few hours back. But all of a sudden, it is popping up error while inserting data into the table .
Error message - "Insufficient Previlages".
Please suggest me what may be the reasons for this kind of error.
Thanks in advance

Sonika wrote:
Hi All.
I have a script that at first creates and then populates a table. My script used to run fine in production environment till few hours back. But all of a sudden, it is popping up error while inserting data into the table .
Error message - "Insufficient Previlages".
Please suggest me what may be the reasons for this kind of error.
1) something changed
2) you are hitting a bug

Inserting rows in table while logging errors...Urgent

Hi all,
i want to insert rows from temp table to main table.
if temp table contains 100 rows.then all rows must be inserted
in main table.if their is any exception while insertion,
insertion must nt stop and erroring rows along with error no must be inserted in
error log table.
How to do this ?
i used forall save exceptions to achieve this .
but ws able to save only error no. but not errroing rows in error log table.
is there any efficient way to achieve this?
can forall be modified in way that it inserts erroring rows also?????

Hi,
1.) does dbms_errorlog works fine in this case?If all of your 807 tables having same columns then i think it will work (NOT TESTED).
By the way are you also trying to insert rows for all tese 807 tables in a single PL/SQL block?
Please post how you are trying to insert then we can think about it,
Oracle ERROR_LOG table allows us to have any number of columns.
From the Oracle Docs:
The number of columns in this part of the error logging table can be zero, one, or more, up to the number of columns in the DML table. If a column exists in the error logging table that has the same name as a column in the DML table, the corresponding data from the offending row being inserted is written to this error logging table column. If a DML table column does not have a corresponding column in the error logging table, the column is not logged. If the error logging table contains a column with a name that does not match a DML table column, the column is ignored.
Regards

How to convert varchar to date datatype while insert or update in table

Hai All
I need to convert to varchar to date.
I have two Tables T1,T2
T1 Structure
Code varchar
Time varchar
Date varchar
T2 Structure
Empname var
Empcode var
Intime date
Outtime date
Intrin date
Introut date
Att_date
Now i need to move Time form T1 to T2 Intime,outtime,intrin,introut according some condition
So now i need to convert Varchar to Date while insert or update
I have tried something
Insert into T1 (code,intime,att_date)values
(code,To_date(Date||time,'dd-mon-yyyy hh24mi'),att_date);
OR While update
Update T2 set Outtime=To_date(Date||time,'dd-mon-yyyy hh24mi') where...
I got an error Ora-01861
Regards
Srikkanth.M

You didn't show any example of your date or time values, butyou might need to add a space between them, like
To_date(Date || ' ' || time,'dd-mon-yyyy hh24mi')

Weird behaviour while inserting in a table

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for