What GPU for my new build?

ASUS P6X58D-E
Intel Quad Core i7 950
CORSAIR XMS3 24GB (6 x 4GB) DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800)
Antec Nine Hundred Two V3 Black Steele ATX Case
CORSAIR CMPSU-850TX 850W
Blu-ray Burner 12x
Boot Drive = 1 Hitachi Deskstar 1TB Hard Drive (0A38016) - 7200rpm, 16MB Cache, SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive
Storage = 3 x Hitachi Deskstar 1TB Hard Drive (0A38016) - 7200rpm, 16MB Cache, SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drives -  Raid Array
G-Tech G-SAFE Hard drive array - 2-bay (2 x 1TB) -- RAID 1
Microsoft Win 7 Professional OEM
Adobe CS5.5
Graphics Card - I,ve been considering the GTX 560Ti.  Would it be worth the couple extra hundred dollars
for the Quadro FX 1800? Budget almost depleated! We're editing AVCHD video in Premiere.
Thanx in advance for any advice om my GPU or any other suggestions for this build.

Skip the Quadro FX 1800 completely: It is an extremely old and now-obsolete GPU, based on an old GeForce 9600 GS, with only 64 CUDA cores and a 192-bit DDR3 memory bus (versus 384 CUDA cores and a 256-bit GDDR5 memory bus on the GTX 560 Ti) - and with the FX 1800 avaiable with only 768MB of RAM, it cannot enable MPE's GPU acceleration feature at all even with the hack (MPE will be permanently stuck in software-only mode with the FX 1800, which can be as much as 10 to 20 times slower than hardware MPE acceleration). The successor to the FX 1800, the Quadro 2000, is based on only a GeForce GTS 450, with slower GPU and memory clocks than a normal GTS 450.
Message was edited by: RjL190365

Similar Messages

  • What is good free burn-in / testing Software for a new Build

    What is recommended for software to burn-in a new system to test stability, etc. (not to test speed for benchmarks) on a new build that is available for free ?  Please provide the name of software and a link where it is available.
     

    Hot Cpu Tester can test every device in the pc .
    Use it alot myself , assisting others with PC's and at work if there is problematic machines .
    Given it thumbs -up in the past and in the present time .  
    http://7byte.com/index.php?page=hotcpu

  • How to copy and use the RAID files for ATI SB600 for a new build

    WinXP Home
    MSI K9A Platinum
    AMD Athlon X2-3600+
    2 x Seagate 250GB SATA2 3GB/s HHD
    2 x HIS X1950Pro in Crossfire
    2 x OCZ2A8002GK Crossfire certified modules
    Enermax Galaxy 850
    Hello, I plan on setting this new build up with SATA RAID 0. I tried to follow the ReadMe file in the RAID drivers download but think I am not fully understanding. The ReadMe says to copy all files to the media...it said floppy but I am going to use a flash drive. I did so but there were two folders, X64 and  X86. Do I open those two folders and copy all the contents or do I just copy the two folders directly to the drive?
    Thank you

    Quote from: lewislink on 05-July-07, 02:13:43
    Open the sub-folders and copy their contents, or copy the sub-folders, themselves?
    What about BIOS update? Will it be necessary to use a floppy or can a flash drive function?
    "What about BIOS update? Will it be necessary to use a floppy or can a flash drive function?"
    don't update the BIOS when everythink is working...
    "Open the sub-folders and copy their contents, or copy the sub-folders, themselves?"
    copy them as is.. directly with sub-folders included.

  • What GPU for Creative Cloud 2014?

    Hello,
    what GPU do you recommend for the Adobe Crative Cloud 2014. I work mostly with Premiere and Photoshop.
    Is a Cuda-based card better than an OpenCL-Card (Nvidia vs. AMD)?
    Appreciating every answer!
    Greetings!

    I'm sure that more technically-minded users will give you a more in-depth explanation.
    Essentially, Premiere CC 2014 (and now AE CC2014) is optimised to use Cuda (Mercury Playback acceleration ) for certain processes, thereby alleviating the load on the CPU... 
    See...
    Mercury, CUDA, and what it all means

  • What GPU for MacPro (Early 2008) 8-core 3,2ghz?

    I'm putting together my new system.
    Mac Pro (Early 2008)
    2 x 3,2 ghz Quad-core Intel Xeon
    12GB 800 MHz DDR2 FB-DIMM
    SSD boot disk
    ATI Radeon HD 4870
    I want to upgrade the GPU, but I am really confused with all the card names en specs.
    I will be using Premiere Pro most of the time.
    I'll be using AE as well, but not as much as PP.
    I'll be using Davinci Resolve as well.
    So I think I prefer Nvidia cards, because of the Cuda.
    I was looking into the GTX 680 or GTX 750ti.
    Thank you in advance for your help! :-)

    If you stay on the path Apple has prepared, things are usually pretty straightforward. If you step off that path, you MAY find yourself lost in the deep woods. Then again, you may be able to do far more than the straight Apple solutions ever allowed.
    If you read that user tip closely, it says you may encounter issues with Mac OS X version requirements, 6-pin and 8-pin aux power requirements, or other issues that are not obvious at first glance. Occasionally you may have to add an additional power supply. Readers have even reported that their cheater cables appeared to work fine, but when they stressed the card their Mac shut down on over-power.
    Just do your homework and make sure you are ready for the problems users have reported in using that card.

  • What Book for the new 1Z0-117 '11gR2 SQL Tuning' ? No OPC available yet.

    Since 1Z0-117 '11gR2 SQL Tuning' is a new exam on beta yet, except Mathew Morris's summary is there a comprehensive Exam Reference Guide like OPC Oracle Experts Exam Guide ?
    Is the +"*Oracle Press Database 11g Release 2 Performance Tuning Tips & Techniques*"+ sufficient ?
    Or I just can look at the Covered Topics and study them from it and other resources ?
    Thank you

    Hmm understood.I will have to map the Sources Topics to the Exams Topics than just having a "served food", like an ordinary exam, its fair enough.
    Its just the concepts concerned are many and many are complex, so specifially here I would require a specially fit OPC book like for SQL Expert.
    Luckily I'd oredered yours at least.
    See SQL Experts, I found the topics quite affordable and I advance quick about 1-2 chapters + Sumed Revision per day, and without questions or errors.
    I guess because of
    1.the OPC Book
    2. since my curent internship is on SQL Analysis
    3. my Thesis was creating an essential DBMS in C++ with embeded SQL Parser and PhP ODBC driver from Scratch
    So I may try start having a look at SQL Tunning also, thus I dont think I could really achieve in paralel preparing for both and with the Internship also.
    Thank you very much once again.

  • What to expect from a new build I'm planning

    I have a basic "opinion" or "guess" question, please.
    I'm planning a new build at some point and have to make a decision on when to take the financial plunge. In a few months, funds will be better, but I can manage the cost now if the speed improvements will be worth it. Speed improvements mean time which means money.
    I'm running a small business producing videos for ourselves for business presentations (marketing and fund-raising) using Premiere Pro, outputting to FLV and DVD.
    My content is pretty simple: video footage (talking head) from a camcorder, with two more tracks for titles and Photoshop images, with dip-to-black transitions. Soon I'll have my video guru provide some 3D animations that will also be included.
    Until now, I've been capturing my footage into an interlaced project where I cut the raw footage into usable pieces. Then, I output those pieces to AVI, which I then run through a routine in Virtual Dub with presets my guru provided me with to take care of noise reduction and deinterlacing. Then, I import that resultant AVI (or set of AVIs) to a progressive project where I finish my editing and add the additional tracks with the titles, images and transitions.
    Then, I output that to AVI, and convert those AVIs to FLV and/or use Encore to create DVD images.
    The main concern I have is the very long wait times when I output to AVI from Premiere, process with Virtual Dub, and output to DVD image from Encore. (Of course, reduction in any wait time adds up, too.)
    So, I have to try to guess at what kind of time I'll save when doing those tasks (and across overall working time) once I build the new machine. That will help me decide on whether to build the new machine now or later, based on the financial criteria.
    I currently own an HP workstation, but it will not support the new Fermie CUDA cards. I want to use a GTX-470 (or -480). This is the pivotal issue that requires I build a new machine. Until then, I’m not using the CS5 MPE-CUDA features. What I don't know is how much time it will really save me on those major time-consuming tasks when I do make the jump.
    One important consideration may lie in the fact that, accoring to my video guru, one of the advantages of the way Premiere CS5 plays well together with the approved CUDA cards is that it does GPU-based deinterlacing. He's suggesting this should may save me the time of having to do it in Virtual Dub phase (I'm not sure what he suggests about the noise reduction -- I think he may have commented that it may no longer be unnecessary, though to me it has seemd to make a huge improvement).
    (Note: I see there are still some bugs in CS5 that hamper the benefits for now. For instance, I've read that there's an issue with CS5 whereby it takes a long time to export to AVI, and that there's a compromise with DV on an external monitor, but I don't know that those are issues in my decision since the former is going to exist regardless of whether I do the new build and the latter probably doesn't even apply to me.)
    Here are my two system configurations, the "before and after," that I want to compare or, rather, to please ask for some guesses about as to potential time savings. Maybe I should call them the "Current" and "New build."
    CURRENT:
    - HP z400 machine -- mid-tower (no room for cooling a Fermie card)
    - CPU: Xeon quad-core 4-thread
    - RAM: 8MB DDR2
    - GPU: nVidia FX-580 (obviously won't support new benefits of CS5 the way the GTX-470/480 in the new build will)
    - DRIVES: one HD for OS/apps, one HD for swap, and three HDs in a RAID-5 array for data
    NEW BUILD:
    - high-end full-tower case with plenty of cooling support
    - MOBO: ASUS P6X58D
    - CPU: i7 930 (maybe OCd a bit, or maybe 980x)
    - RAM: 12GB DDR3 triple-channel
    - GPU: nVidia GTX-470 (or maybe 480)
    - DRIVES: either same as current system, or maybe going to five drives in a RAID-3 array for data
    I'd be hugely grateful for any guesses as to how much time in the major encoding tasks (and in overall work time) the new build is likely to save me.
    Thanks so much!
    Jay

    Bill Gehrke wrote:
    Jay, I wonder about this statement of yours "I currently own an HP workstation, but it will not support the new Fermie CUDA cards". How did you come to that conclusion?
    Hi Bill,
    Well, I make that assertion after a huge amount of time lost trying to make it work.
    (See my posts July 16 and July 18th in this thread for the longer version of my excursion: http://forums.adobe.com/message/2945538#2945538)
    The GTX-470 calls for at least 550W of power, The HP z400 workstation comes with 475W and it's a proprietary power supply. It won't take a standard ATX PSU -- the screw holes won't line up and even its pin-out for the system power plug is custom.
    Undaunted, I bought a Corsair HX750W power supply and placed it outside of the machine on the floor, and used it solely to power the GPU.
    I put the GTX-470 in and left the case cover off while familiarizing myself with Windows 7 for a couple days, but when I came into the office the third say the machine was locked up and the GPU was scorching hot. All fans on all components seemed to be working fine.
    (I also noticed that the onboard sound never installed and there was no sound, and that the Sound, video and game controllers section in Device Manager only had four instances of "NVIDIA High Definition Audio." HP tech support was at a loss. My video guru says those drivers are probably normal from the GTX-470 card, but nobody could explain why the mother board considered that a replacement for the onboard sound. We don't know if that was a sign of imperfect compatibility between the GPU and mother board, which seems feasible since I had already learned -- the hard way after days of work -- that the mother board was at least a little custom in that the PSU was custom even at the system plug.)
    So, when I had come that mornign and found the machine locked and the GPU super hot, I expermimented by cooling the machine down with a huge 12" external fan, then rebooted. For the next fifteen hours I waited to see if it would again heat up and lock up (or was it "lock up then heat up"?) and put more load on it by playing an AVI in WMP full-screen a number of times. For those fifteen hours the system ran fine and GPU stayed somewhere between cool and only very moderately warm.
    Nobody has had a reason why it had ended up with the machine locked and the GTX-470 resulted scorching hot.
    Bad GPU? Insufficient cooling? (Which maybe caused the system board to lock down the machine... which caused it to keep the GPU going with insufficient fan power???) Incompatibility between the GPU and system board? (Which had caused it to lock up the GPU in "on" mode and thus get scorching hot?)
    And the consensus among those who thought it was a cooling issue was "almost" unanimous in saying that just running it with the case cover on would not be enough to keep the GPU reliably below the necessary cooling threshold, especially since I hadn't even begun to put a real load on it (I hadn't even installed Premiere on the machine yet).
    And, it seemed evident to me that trying to creatively pack the machine with fans and cooling was just not realistic. If it is, I'd like to know, since that would be a lot cheaper than building a $5,000 machine. Here's a picture of the machine with the GTX-470 in it: www.silver100.com/x/z400_GTX-470.JPG.
    Of course, all the cooling in the world still wouldn't help if the problem was compatibility with the system board.
    You'll notice I got no responses at that other thread when I asked what the "guess" was as to the cause. So, I figured that -- short of it being a bad GPU -- building a new machine was the only way to fix it if it was a cooling problem and the only way to fix it if it was a compatibility problem.
    I'm sure anxious to hear your thoughts.
    Thanks so much!
    Jay

  • New Build for Lightroom 3

    First post so please be kind
    I currently am using an old P4 machine to edit my photos. I up until a month ago was using acdsee for editing my Canon 5D files. I've since upgraded to a 5d mark2 and downloaded the free trial of lightroom 3 and so far loving all the capabilities it offers over acdsee. However it's dog slow on my p4 with 4gb ram and running Win XP. So I'm in the market for a new build specifically for lightroom 3. My budget is small, I've done some research but still not sure on cpu/mobo and if I really need 8gb of ram or can get away with 4gb. Hard drives I've decided on are 2 WD velociraptors 300gb one for OS
    and the 2nd for Programs which mainly will only be LR 3
    2 1tb WD Black, one for my photo storage and one for back up.
    Last drive will be a 1 or 2 TB external drive for backup.
    Will the video from the mobo be enough for Lightroom 3 or do i need to upgrade that as well?
    I've seen some great deals on refurbished pc's and also I am capable of building a pc from a barebones kit.
    Any suggestions you guys have would be great!
    Thank you,
    [personal information removed by moderator]

    Have a look here: Adobe Forums: What PC to build?
    Now this is for video editing. Your requirements for LR are much less, so take a specific look at the budget model. That should be more than enough for your purposes. Your suggested disk setup looks like overkill (yeah, coming from me, that is hardly possible, but I mean it). You could shave off sizable $$ by going for a single Velociraptor and using simple Samsung Spinpoint F3's instead.

  • Brand New Build - Completing Installation Hangs

    Hey Guys,
    I just bought all the following components for a new build:
    Gigabyte GA 965P-S3 MOBO
    Intel Core 2 Duo E4300 (1.8Ghz)
    1GB (2x512) Corsair DDR2 (667) RAM
    200Gb HGST SATA300 HDD
    256Mb XFX 7600GS GPU
    Pioneer DVR-112DBK
    And...Windows Vista Home Basic.
    OK, so hardware wasn't a problem, had everything hooked up and neat within 2 hours.
    Plug in the power and turn it on (it's alive!) with the Windows DVD in the drive, and boots to Vista installation...choose language/enter product key/accept licence blah blah...Copying Files...Expanding Files...Installing updates...computer reboots, back to installation.
    Now the problem, the installation screen comes back up and displays ticks by all of the previous steps, and has the Completing Installation unticked and the three dots...waiting...waiting...waiting.
    And thats it, Vista installation will go no further than that. Have left the installation on overnight and nothing happens. The HDD light will flicker every so often, and stay on constantly for a few seconds and then go off for ages.
    After a while, I got fed-up of waiting, so I installed XP Pro and that worked first time like a charm, setup was complete in no longer than 45 minutes and within an hour all drivers had been setup.
    I can't think why anything would impeed the installation, everything was spec'd to work with Vista.
    I have tried 'unplugging the monitor cable' and toning-down the bios settings, but there was still no joy.
    Any help greatly appreciated.

    I found a simple way to do things, and have done some home work.  I found out that most of the systems that are having problems with Vista are not realy Vista ready.   I have a laptop that was not build for Vista I have installed Vista premium edition on it. With the help of the guys at Munksupport Their service is free just clcik on th elive help sign on the right.
    But here. all we have to do is get standard hardware devices, most of the newer hardware devices are not ready and if you are going use brand new hardware devices, get ready for a lot of hard work. I use to have problem with application not working properly, as The guys at MunkSupport proved, the older hardware devices that you are able to find drivers for under XP, that worked will work under Vista.
    If you are not able to configure an XP system by going to the manufactures website and downloading and having that device running under XP forget trying to run Vista on that device. Most of these new devices will wirk well under XP because XP have drivers for thsoe devices in its drivers folder, C:\windows\Driver Cache\i386\driver.cab. Most device drivers are found their, that's why when you install some devices you do not need to install the drivers for it. Windows will find the device and install it for you.
    The disk tha came with the device are often time updated drivers that ad functionallity to the device. For Vista they are not ready, that why we are having so many problems, their are confliting applications, and no one was ready for Vista release.  Older hardware may give you a slower performance but they  are the working ones.
    When you install Vista, it reorders the driver.cab folder, they calle it the driver store now. and most of the support for thsoe drivers are not in that store for the newer devices. also due to the great amount of security they place it this Vista system, Most drivers wont work. Here is why
    Most drivers will try to write in the Kernel area are RAM directly, But Vista have no heart for that, that's why everything you do under Vista you get that popup that asked you if you want to continue.
    Simple, If you can configure the device to work and run undeer Xp chances are it will work under Vista.
    To test this out her is what you do.     Under XP remove the drivers for your hardware devices except for your video and Network adapter, make sure you have backup. Visit the manufacturers website download the drivers and setup each device, after yo have down so get a windows update and see if thsoe devices still work. then install SP2 and use the system fro a few days, then install all of windows updates. see if any device fails, or if you run into any aspplication poblems, if so run another windows update, sometime updates mess upi your system. take note of everything you do then upgrade to Vista. If all things work out well
    for information visit Munsupport.com, and ask thsoe guys they know their stuff. Some things may take a while to solve, but it's free and they get back to you.

  • Fans and Z87-GD65 new build question

    Hi.  I am waiting on all my parts for a new build this week.  I've only done one build before and that was over 4 years ago (i5-750 / MSI P55-GD65).  My question is regarding fans and how to control them on the Z87-GD65 mobo.  My case comes with three 140 mm 3-pin fans and a 3 fan 3-speed manual fan controller.  I've never used a fan controller before and would prefer to use SpeedFan or the BIOS to adjust speed fans based on CPU/GPU temperatures.  Will I be able to set up automatic speed control in BIOS or SpeedFan for all 3 fans with this motherboard?  Or do I need PWM fans to do so?  What if I want to install 2 extra fans?  Any help would be appreciated!
    CPU: Intel Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz Quad-Core Processor
    CPU Cooler: Phanteks PH-TC12DX_RD 68.5 CFM CPU Cooler 
    Motherboard: MSI Z87-GD65 Gaming ATX LGA1150 Motherboard 
    Memory: G.Skill Sniper Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3-1866 Memory 
    Storage: Samsung 840 EVO 250GB 2.5" Solid State Disk
    Video Card: Sapphire Radeon HD 7950 3GB Video Card
    Case: Fractal Design Arc Midi R2 (Black) ATX Mid Tower Case
    Power Supply: SeaSonic G 550W 80+ Gold Certified Semi-Modular ATX Power Supply

    Those connected to the fan controllers are controlled through their buttons (or whatever to adjust the speed). Those connected to motherboard, are connected through a software, such as Command Centre (which in my opinion is great for this).
    Not sure how many connectors do you have on the motherboard, but I think there's x2 CPUFan and x3 SysFan. That means you can have x5 fans connected to them. But you can either purchase a Y splitter which will let you connect 2 fans into a single socket (I am using one Y splitter) or just get proper fan controller.

  • AMD FX3850 For budget editing build?

    Hello,
    First off I would like to thank the dedicated users who have shared there knowlage over the years.  Its taken quite awhile but ive sifted through alot of it over the last couple weeks with the intent on chosing parts for a new build.  I'm wondering what peoples thoughts are on the knew piledriver achitecture in the FX 8350 and 8320 and if it has a place at the center of a budget workstation.  
    A little bit more about my needs.
    At the moment I'm a student and under a vary tight budget.  Photo and video editing has long been a hoby and only recently turned more serious/semi-professional (aka Friends pay for odd jobs).  Im happy to say that this is ramping up.  I personal plans to take things farther and more work then my current tools can handle (aka asus gaming laptop).  This comming year I will be doing a series of web videos in conjuntion with a website I will be managing.  A more personal project will be starting a documentry on the local action sports scene.  So broken down more briefly.
    - I will by no means be editing 24/7.  Though quick response and smothe performance will be required.
    - I will be shooting mostly with Panasonic GH2/3  The Hacked footage is high bitrate AVCHD
    This isn't my first PC build.  Though the first workstation.  I will overclock.
    It seems everyone is a proponent of Intell.  I can see why they firmly sit on top of the performance heap.  The money you pay to get to the top of said pile grows exponetionly the closer you get there. The reason i'm even considering AMD is they fall into my price range with a chip that seems well tailored to pp.  well its benchmarked at exporting certain formats well. anyway.  So why not go with what is tried and ture? say a i7 2600, it could be good for a budget build. Well that chip is almost 100 bucks more then the amd's current price.  If you upgrade one part of your system you either forgo balance and end up wasting your investment, or you upgrade more and the price grows. That said I havn't tested it, I dont know if my FX build would be balanced.
    As much as I want a cheap system I dont want somthing that wont hanndle the work  load, especialy as its unlikely to change for at least a few years.
    so with that in regard I have not left the i7 3770k and 3820 out either.  With Haswell comming it would be nice to be able to upgrade, though realisticly that would be several years out bacause the build should need it untill then.
    The amd build orrigaly hit about 1k when i priced it out.  I thought the i7 would run close to 2k so i discounted it as an option. then I saw this.
    http://www.pacifier.com/~jtsmith/ADOBE.HTM
    i7 3770 for $1200. for sure!  However further inspection shows some of thoes components are well, cheap.  exactly what there supposed  to be .  So do I go with a AMD build for 1k.  Or maybe upgrade to multiple HDD 32gb ram,  SSD with the AMD chip and a 660ti for 12-1300.  Or would it be better to do the budget i7 system for about the same price.  Or, what I maybe leaning to more now, a i7 with a good board, 16gb ram(should be enough), and bare minimum HDD as AVCHD dosn't seem to as r/w dependent as it is CPU processing power.
    So for thoes that want the shrot version and avoid my long winded speach.  here are my questions.
    AMD FX 3850:  is it enough to edit AVCHD single cam smothly?  If an intel chip is prefered even in the same class, say an i5 or i7 2600 why?
    is AVCHD format video CPU depended enough to need, say  a i7 3770 and will it bottleneck on the drives without a fast or multi drive setup? am I better off with the AMD chip and multiple harddrives?

    Bill,
    Thanks for your reply and PPBM. The way I understand it "pile driver" supports thoes instructions.  Is it that it may not perform said instructoins as efficently givving ground to the intel chips?
    With your i7 2600 machine do you have a multi hard drive setup or raid arary.   Certainly a fully optomized systeem, especialy one with a i7, would have raid.  but because of the compressed nature of AVCHD would single drives suffice?
    Hacked Gh2 footage is often low GOP at bitrates over 150 mb/s  Though I may have answered my own question here.  Would a bitrate higher then a drives R/W rate be a problem requireing raid for smoothe editing?
    @Harm,
    Again thanks for PPBM.  I enjoyed your build log and helpful forum posts.  Putting things in lamens terms really sped up the learning curve.  I have spent some time on PPBM.  What gives me pause about the FX results is there are only 2.  It's certainly not enough data.  With other chips, like the 3770k or 2600, you can see results from 1000+ to top 100.  This surly shows setup and configuration are more important then just the chip.  Could this be true with the AMD chips?
    Would a less then optimal set up hold their score back to 500, just as with some of the i7's?
    The builds seem all over the place.  even the i7's over 500: some have 8gigs of ram, some have 16, some have raid, and some dont.  i dont know quite what to make of it.
    My thinking is that I would be better off with an Optimized AMD setup then a not optimized i7 priced similarly, with bottlenecks left and right.  However if AVCHD stresses drives less and the CPU more, I certainly see merrit to a i7 without a raid setup for better performance, then amd at a similar cost. With better upgrade options as well and the peace of mind knowing that if its done right a solid score is achiveable.  with amd its unkown it seems.  Thats a big one. 
    With PPBM not spicificly testing AVCHD performance.  What are key areas for good performance with that codec?
    If I can wait I certainly will and will likely build a system based on parts you have outlined in other posts, in the intermediate or warrior catagory.  Or see what Haswell has to offer next year: at least price drops for existing chips.

  • The new build says Jboss is suported and GlassFish no.. anyone know why?

    We noticed this when reviewing the new buid docs.

    Actually, the release notes for the new build (11.1.1.0.2) says that the ONLY thing currently supported is WLS 10.3, and that JBoss is currently not supported, although they intend to.
    John

  • Which is the link to download esd file in my language (Italian) for the 10041 build x64?

    I need to download the iso or at least the esd file for the new build 10041 of Win 10 Pro TP x64, because I have to reinstall it on a VHD to double-boot on my machine. I know that this is a fast update so there is not yet an .iso to download.
    Till now I tested Win 10 Pro TP on a Hyper-V VM included the last update to 10041 build, but I am having many limitations (audio drivers, webcam drivers, Cortana in Italian, etc.) so I decided to move to a booting VHD on my x64 machine.
    I have the link to the us-en .esd link (from us magazines), but not to my Italian version needed to create the iso image, where can I get it?
    Thank you in advance
    rinog47

    I need to download the iso or at least the esd file for the new build 10041 of Win 10 Pro TP x64, because I have to reinstall it on a VHD to double-boot on my machine. I know that this is a fast update so there is not yet an .iso to download.
    Till now I tested Win 10 Pro TP on a Hyper-V VM included the last update to 10041 build, but I am having many limitations (audio drivers, webcam drivers, Cortana in Italian, etc.) so I decided to move to a booting VHD on my x64 machine.
    I have the link to the us-en .esd link (from us magazines), but not to my Italian version needed to create the iso image, where can I get it?
    Thank you in advance
    rinog47
    Gabriel Aul posted a reply...........
    If you aren't able to enable Cortana in a supported language/region with PC build 10041, some help available:
    http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/insider/forum/insider_wintp-insider_cortana/how-to-enable-cortana-in-build-10041-in-chinese/4e79ee06-dd46-48b6-937c-5dff966248b6?tm=1427148740859 …
    Basically the link he provided is about the followings ...................
    1. Download 9926 ISO selecting the desired language (which is Italian in your case ). Install build 9926. Install the necessary windows updates and wait for build 10041 via WU.
    OR,
    2. Wait for the release of build 10041 ISO ( which will come same time as the release in Slow ring ). Then, you can select the desired language and download the ISO for install.

  • K8n neo2 new build question?

    Im currently in the process of building a new comp based on the neo2 platinum.This machine will have fx53 processor(when i can find one in stock)an audigy 2 sound card and either an albatron 6800ultra or an asus x800xe pe.i acutally have both cards now jus waiting too see which will be the better choice for hl2(the reason for the new build in the first place).Ram will be two pieces of corsair xms 3500 for 1 gig total.Sorry for the long wind but i wanted to give as good of a hardware portrait that i can to get an accurate answer.Okay i cant figure out the best pci slot for the audigy2.I beleive its either slot 3 or slot 4 occording to the manuel but i wanted peoples opinion who have alreay built thier machine,hopefully close to the specs provided.Thanks in advance and sorry for all the typing;)
                                                            Jake

    I just put mine as far from the grapics card as I could, well almost so I used the one up from the orange slot. Anyone know why the last one is orange???

  • I have a production mobile Flex app that uses RemoteObject calls for all data access, and it's working well, except for a new remote call I just added that only fails when running with a release build.  The same call works fine when running on the device

    I have a production mobile Flex app that uses RemoteObject calls for all data access, and it's working well, except for a new remote call I just added that only fails when running with a release build. The same call works fine when running on the device (iPhone) using debug build. When running with a release build, the result handler is never called (nor is the fault handler called). Viewing the BlazeDS logs in debug mode, the call is received and send back with data. I've narrowed it down to what seems to be a data size issue.
    I have targeted one specific data call that returns in the String value a string length of 44kb, which fails in the release build (result or fault handler never called), but the result handler is called as expected in debug build. When I do not populate the String value (in server side Java code) on the object (just set it empty string), the result handler is then called, and the object is returned (release build).
    The custom object being returned in the call is a very a simple object, with getters/setters for simple types boolean, int, String, and one org.23c.dom.Document type. This same object type is used on other other RemoteObject calls (different data) and works fine (release and debug builds). I originally was returning as a Document, but, just to make sure this wasn't the problem, changed the value to be returned to a String, just to rule out XML/Dom issues in serialization.
    I don't understand 1) why the release build vs. debug build behavior is different for a RemoteObject call, 2) why the calls work in debug build when sending over a somewhat large (but, not unreasonable) amount of data in a String object, but not in release build.
    I have't tried to find out exactly where the failure point in size is, but, not sure that's even relevant, since 44kb isn't an unreasonable size to expect.
    By turning on the Debug mode in BlazeDS, I can see the object and it's attributes being serialized and everything looks good there. The calls are received and processed appropriately in BlazeDS for both debug and release build testing.
    Anyone have an idea on other things to try to debug/resolve this?
    Platform testing is BlazeDS 4, Flashbuilder 4.7, Websphere 8 server, iPhone (iOS 7.1.2). Tried using multiple Flex SDK's 4.12 to the latest 4.13, with no change in behavior.
    Thanks!

    After a week's worth of debugging, I found the issue.
    The Java type returned from the call was defined as ArrayList.  Changing it to List resolved the problem.
    I'm not sure why ArrayList isn't a valid return type, I've been looking at the Adobe docs, and still can't see why this isn't valid.  And, why it works in Debug mode and not in Release build is even stranger.  Maybe someone can shed some light on the logic here to me.

Maybe you are looking for