What I Hear is NOT What I Get when I export

I finally learned how to create a multi-track song in GarageBand 2. I spent hours getting it the way I wanted it -- and it sounded great -- Then I exported it to iTunes, and when it played there, the tempo was much slower than it had been when I played it in GarageBand. Also, some of the tracks were off in terms of timing.
To make matters worse, when I then go back to listen again to the song in GarageBand 2, it is screwing up there, too -- all this despite the fact that the song played perfectly (in terms of tempo and being in sync) the last time I played it PRIOR to exporting it to iTunes.
Can someone tell me why What I Hear is Not "What I Get" with Garageband? and why it's mucking up the final version of my songs when I export them to iTunes.
Thanks
iBook G4 Mac OS X (10.3.9)

Hi,
Does this happen when you try to type in a message ? Did u check in the Active Notes, Contact, Office applications etc. ?
Also check what is the language set in the Message Editor settings.
Regards
Ashish/-
Ashish/-

Similar Messages

AUDIO: What You Hear Is NOT What You Get

hi guys. i have seen this problem being reported on numerous occasions on this forum, but can't remember if it's really been tackled and solved.
It may seem the question audio-related and should have been posted in another thread, but i do tend to think it's macbook-related for some reason.
you see i've worked for ages on ibooks and powerbooks and whatever sound i'd hear through my headphones in any audio-production programme, exactly the same sound would be exported as mixdown.
now that i've added a macbook to my gear, what i hear during mix, mastering, etc. is NOT what i get on export! my exported material is full of clipping and distortion.
yes, i know that those "reds" on mixer channels are supposed to mean peaking and that should be avoided. but why is it that i don't hear distortion through headphones/monitors when i see red while my exported audio is distorted?
as opposed to that, when working on my powerbook g4:
red = clipping and distortion in any DAW = clipping and distortion in exported audio
whereas, once again, on a macbook:
red = most clear sound in any DAW = clipping and distortion in exported audio.
any thoughts? please! could this be a common macbook / onboard soundcard problem?

pardon,I'm a little confused... Scenario:Not using cycle record. One track for a lead vocal.I puch in vocal phrases.Is there a technique for going back to earlier pass takes and lock a take in the arrange window if I want to ?Why create duplicate tracks?I do not want to create extra tracks,want the lead vocal to be on it's own single track that has punches.I usually only want the most recent punch as I move on after a good take.In this current song I rewind happy to hear my performance but I end up seeing it(the punch)but hearing and underlying take ??? Why. PLease elaborate. Thanks ~
G5 Dual 2.7 Mac OS X (10.4.3)

What You Hear Is NOT What You Get

(previously posted on another thread. never got an answer to this, though.)
hi guys. i have seen this problem being reported on numerous occasions on this forum, but can't remember if it's really been tackled and solved.
It may seem the question audio-related and should have been posted in another thread, but i do tend to think it's macbook-related for some reason.
you see i've worked for ages on ibooks and powerbooks and whatever sound i'd hear through my headphones in any audio-production programme, exactly the same sound would be exported as mixdown.
now that i've added a macbook to my gear, what i hear during mix, mastering, etc. is NOT what i get on export! my exported material is full of clipping and distortion.
yes, i know that those "reds" on mixer channels are supposed to mean peaking and that should be avoided. but why is it that i don't hear distortion through headphones when i see red while my exported audio is distorted?
as opposed to that, when working on my powerbook:
red = clipping and distortion in any DAW = clipping and distortion in exported audio
whereas, once again, on a macbook:
red = most clear sound in any DAW = clipping and distortion in exported audio.
any thoughts? please! could this be a common mabook / onboard soundcard problem?

Whatever answer will be given: Use a Limiter when doing a mixdown and exporting. Going over 0db is never a good idea with digital equipment.
Fox

"What u Hear" does not work (SPDIF)

- Hi!
"What u Hear" option doesn't work after I changed the output to SPDIF. The question is, how i could record sound that goes through my audio card (X-Fi Xtreme Gamer).
In windows' recording tab are these options for recording:
Microphone
Auxiliary
Line-In
What u Hear
Pls help
I have win 7 ultimate x64 as OS.

new new VisRe: "What u Hear" does not work (SPDIF)Y I have exactly the same issue. When I originally got my new Vista PC, 'what you hear' wasn't available. It became available when I installed the new driver, as indicated here:http://support.creative.com/Products/ProductDetails.aspx?catID=&CatName=Sound+Blaster&s ubCatID=208&subCatName=X-Fi&prodID=4066&prodName=X-Fi+XtremeMusic&bTopTwenty=&VARSET=prodfaq:PRODFAQ_ 4066,VARSET=CategoryID:
However, If I open 'Smart Recorder' for example, I can select 'What yiou hear (Creative SB X-Fi)' as an option, but hitting record doen't record what is playing on the PC. So it doesn't actually seem to do anything...
...unless anyone knows different?... Is there a setting I missing? Everything looks fine in the 'Recording Divices -> Record' tab...

LR4.2 printing multiple cell with overlap - What you see IS NOT what you get ?

Hi,
I am using LR4.2 and PS-elements. Epson 3800 for printing
PS - never an isue.
user is admin ..
I get a strange phenomena in LR4.2 when doing multiple cells on same print - with overlapping: At time what you see is not what's going to be printed! at times you will get the printout with some of the cells mising photos (even printing them to file will result in the same way..). Post the printing (ouch wasting of paper...) if I select the cell, I can "send it to the front, ad now it will be printed ok/.
Please advice - did you see this before >?
Ami

I have never tried printing overlapping photos. Can you describe how to a simple photo layout that demonstrates the problem so others can try? Or at least include a screen-capture of the layout that is showing the issue. It may have something to do with your particular printer driver even if you print to a JPG, but if others, with other printers have the same issue, then it is likely something within LR, only.

How do I search for an App? I want to find a specific app. – not what's popular, not what's best selling, not what's new – there is no search

How do I search for an App? I want to find a specific app. – not what's popular, not what's best selling, not what's new – there is no search box!!

Is this on a computer's iTunes or an iOS device ? On a computer's iTunes when viewing the store the search box at the top right of iTunes should search the store :
The on the results screen select Apps.
On an iOS device you should have a search tab at the bottom of the App Store app.

What's the multi colored pinwheel I get when I work on my mac book pro?

What's the multi colored pinwheel I get when I work on my mac book pro?

Zyriab wrote:
it means the system is busy and you have to wait before it will respond to mouse clicks or key presses by you.
Sligh correction here. Sometimes it is the system; but sometimes it is just a specific app, while the system will continue to accept user input, and you may switch to a different app.
The 'official' name is the spinning wait cursor. Go to
<http://www.thexlab.com/faqs/sbbod.html>
for a few more details and troubleshooting techniques (if necessary).

"What U Hear" option not available when installing Audigy 1 web drivers, was available bef

Hello, on the current format of my computer I only installed the latest version of the drivers off of the support website and did not install from the cd that came with sound card. Under Sound Recording from sounds and audio dvices in control panel I can only select SB AUdigy Audio [E400]. Before I remember being able to select "What U Hear".
Was this left out of the web drivers? Is there anyway to get it without isntalling original driver cd?

coldpenguin,
I can't recall much info for the Audigy but see if the option is listed in the properties setting. Open sounds and audio devices and go to audio tab. Click at Volume button of the 'Sound Recording' column. Now click on Options->Properties. Do you have that option listed?
Jason

Smartforms - What you see is not what you get ?

I create a delivery note by smartforms.
Print Preview in the PC, the position of data is correct.
But printed on the paper, what you see in the PC is not what you get? The page format is custom, not standard.
Is there somebody know reason?
Thanks!!

I all really depends on the printer, the print drivers, and how the printer is setup on the basis side.
I have seen the same thing when printing one layout from two different printers. They didn't look the same.
Regards,
Rich Heilman

Microphone and what U hear can not be use at the same time at the same time

I am using Creative SB X-fi Xtreme Gamer (Creative Model Number: SB073A), sound card and have down loaded the latest drivers (version 2.18.15). What U hear is enabled, which in turned makes the microphone unavailable. If you reverse the settings, then what U hear is unavailable.
It appears that; microphone and "What U Hear" can't be enabled at the same time. If someone has an answer on how to correct the following settings to achieve; using the microphone and what U hear at the same time would be appreciated.
My OS is WIN 7x32

It was possible in Windows XP but due to windows 7 own audio mixer this does not work anymore.

Audigy SB What you hear WHY NOt?!

!I DONT GET IT!
Why the hell we dont have What you hear?! WHY?
I want that feature ! , i purchase and i am your costumer and i want that future!
I heard that Audigy SB had that feature but the drivers delete it!
WHY becouse i didnt bought X-FI?!
WHY!
Why realtek have stereo mix! and i dont have what? you hear ?! please help me!

I also can't 'broadcast' any music, I don't know what could be the problem. The plug of the microphone is phantom power though, if that is of any help.
Any suggestions?
Message Edited by Athferion on 07-22-2009 07:53 [email protected]

What release level of code do you get when you download a disk image (ISO/IMG) of a click-to-run Office 2013 product?

I’ve asked a similar question to this on an Office Community Forum but nobody knows the answer. So
I was hoping that an IT professional responsible for installing and deploying Office 2013 might know.
If you download an installation disk image (ISO/IMG) of a click-to-run Office 2013 product from office.microsoft.com/myaccount (Account Options:
Install from a disc > I want to burn a disc), what release level of code do you get?
Now that Service Pack 1 is available, do you get a disk image with Service Pack 1 incorporated?
Or do you still get the RTM (Release to Manufacturing) level of code?

Diane, thank you for the reply.
I was hoping that someone who has downloaded a disk image since SP1 became available would be able to confirm that for a fact.
I have just found a good description of Click-to-Run on Technet that I didn't know existed. The link is: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj219427(v=office.15)
The article states:
"Click-to-Run products that you download and install from Microsoft are up-to-date from the start. You won’t have to download and apply any updates or service packs immediately after you install the Office product."
This statement is probably true if you click the Install button on office.microsoft.com/myaccount and install "in real-time" over the Internet. However, I know for a fact that it is not true if you order a backup disk (Account
Options: Install from a disc > I want to purchase a disc). All you get is RTM level code (15.0.4420.1017).
So I still feel uneasy about what release level you get if you download a disk image. I don't want to download what might be the better part of 1GB of code over the Internet only to discover it is back level.
Addendum (6 April 2014): I decided to perform an experiment. I looked at the size of the data on my backup disk which contains RTM level code. It is 2.04GB. I then went to office.microsoft.com/myaccount and clicked to download a disk
image of my Office 2013 product. The pop-up window that asks me whether I want to Run or Save the file informed me that the size of the file is 2.04GB!!! I cancelled the download. I strongly suspect that, if I had continued with the
download, I would have received the same RTM level code I already have dating back to October 2012. I think this is awful customer service. To some extent, I can understand the logistical problems of replacing backup disks lying in warehouses
waiting to be shipped. But I cannot understand why disk images on download servers cannot be refreshed quickly.

Not showing year data when we export into infoview

Hi All,
We had a issue with Crystal reports .We created crystal report through BW query .When we run in local machine it is working fine . When we exported in the info view one of year column data is not showing . What could be the reason behind on this ?
Thanks
Praveen

Hi Praveen,
It could be a problem with the patching on the XI3.1 server compared to the CR client machine. Have you checked that both client\server are patched to the same level?
If CR is installed on the XI3.1 server can you test the report there, does it refresh ok?
Have you checked that the latest SAP Transports have been imported into the BW system from the XI3.1 Service Pack\FixPack?
If the problem is still persisting I would recommend that you log a message with SAP Support.
I hope this is a very helpful answer to you.
Kind regards,
John

Merge to HDR Pro: What you see is not what you get?

I am using PSCC on an iMac (Mavericks). When I bring bracketed shots into PSCC's Merge to HDR Pro, I can work the settings and/or presets to get an image that looks OK. However, when I exit from HDR Pro by clicking OK, the image displayed in PSCC is very different from what I was just looking at in HDR Pro. The screenshots here show just one example, working in 16-bit mode. Other images show even greater differences. Working in 32-bit mode makes it even worse. This did not use to happen in my earlier versions of PS (perpetual license). Am I missing something or doing something wrong?
Image in HDR Pro:
Image in PSCC after clicking OK:

Trevor.Dennis wrote:
Yes I realised that. There are now quite a few applications for processing HDR, and IMO Photomatix has always been the best of them, and certainly did a better job than Photoshop. My point was that the old 'Merge to HDR Pro' workflow is now redundant if you have Photoshop CC, and that using Camera RAW as outlined by Julianne Kost, has suddenly leapfrogged all the competition by an order of magnitude.
So I strongly urge you to take Mr Prengel's advice. Output the image in 32bit, and use ACR to process it. Did you watch the video tutorial I linked to?
You certainly shouldn't get all pixel-peeper about how the 32bit image looks on your screen. It is not possible to show the tonal width of a 32 bit image on a computer screen, so you are seeing a 'representation' of how it might look after processing.
FWIIW I have taught HDR (and Photoshop) to some of the best photographers in the world at two PSNZ National Conventions back in 2010 and 2011, so I kind of have strong opinions about it. Not that I use it excessively, but it is a very handy tool to keep in your photographic skills repertoire.
Trevor,
I am sorry if I misunderstood your post. I am actually using the same workflow as Julianne Kost in her video (which I had watched prior to posting here). And, as I posted above, I do agree with Mr. Prengel that I should just take the 32 bit image into Camera Raw and do the toning there. As a matter of fact, that is what I have been doing in Photoshop CC (sending the pictures from Lightroom, same as Julianne Kosts does), and I can do a very good job, if I say so myself.
So the question I had was merely one of puzzlement at seeing the difference between the image just before exiting HDR Pro and what shows up in Camera Raw. In the examples I provided, and in many other cases, it clearly went beyond pixel-peeping: they were two very different images. But I think I understand now why this is, which you kindly pointed out: it is not possible to show the tonal width of a 32 bit image on a computer monitor. I had not considered that and I thank you for mentioning it.
It may be that in some cases (as in Julianne Kosts's video) the representation in HDR Pro is actually pretty close to the initial view in Camera Raw, but in other cases (my examples) it is not. Not really an issue, I agree.

What You see is not what you get when printing a adobe PDF file

Hi, we use adobe pdf files to send printing of maps to different customers. Quite often a pdf file looks Ok on the screen but printed on paper some lines is crossing the paper which should not be there.
It is easy to reproduce and seems to happen on different computers. Most of them use windows7. If we use another program than adobe for displaying and printing the same file the print is correct.
Is this a bug in print driver or in the Adobe reader which produce the data for the print driver. Most files is created by a thin print solution called UNIPRINT.

The text spacing also frustrates me, but I'm afraid is a drawback of the iWeb system. I always have to go back and re-tweak certain paragraphs that I try to squeeze into a smaller space. I've learned that it's best to allow for a little breathing room with the width and height of the text field. If the text field is exactly the width and height of your paragraph in iWeb, chances are the lines are going to bump down just a hair, creating an extra line of text which will decrease your line spacing if the height is also tight. Does that make sense?
As far as the hyperlinks go, I used to get freaked out because what I thought was the wrong formatting, but what I found out was just the formatting for having visited the linked site.
What iWeb does for those of us who don't know or don't care to mess with html code is an extremely complex process that I can't even begin to understand. And on top of that you add the relative unpredictability of the various browsers and systems that are out there. You have to roll with the punches and figure out these little discrepancies to get the finished product you want.
Good luck!

What I Hear is NOT What I Get when I export

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for