What is load balancing "stickyness" problem

We are getting this error " Failed to send alert messages to browser " on the interaction centre after saving the ticket followed by the END button.
There is a similar thread with the same issue [CRM 2007-IC Web Interface Message - Failed to send Alert Message to Browser;
in the observations one of the solution for the issue was load balancing "stickyness" problem
If any one can share some knowledge on load balancing "stickyness" problem it is really appreciated and points will be awarded.
regards
Kumar
Edited by: S Kumar on Jun 16, 2011 11:28 AM

Clustering : is the use of multiple computers to provide a single service.
Load Balancing: Technique implemented to spread "load" between alike computers for service availability via unshared system resources increasing system availability and performance.
Please refer to this link to gather more about :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Load_balancing_%28computing%29

Similar Messages

What is load balancer in fms cluster and how to configure it and testing fms clustering

Hey guys,
I am new to fms and clustering the fms server in origin-edge mode.But i am confused actually what is load balancer and how to configure it .
After configuring , how to test and confirm that fms clustering is working.Is there any one can help me, plz....................
thanks in Advance........

Flash Media Server does not come bundled with a load balancer. In theory, one deploys FMS in an edge/origin configuration like this
1 Origin ----> N Edges ------> Customer Traffic
The idea here is that N edges shoulder the load for most customers with a single origin coordinating resources like VOD content or script access. The issue that remains is "how do I spread customers over the N edges" and that's where load balancing comes in. Most customers use a prepackaged load balancing solution - as an Adobe staffer I can't recommend any of them over the other, but you should be able to get some recommendations here along with just googling for it. The short answer contained here though is, you're going to have to find one outside of FMS if that's needed for your setup.
Asa

What is Load balancing..??

could anyone help me what is Load balancing..??
Best regrads!

Load balancing is nothing but ..keeping work processes busy...
If for particular workprocess 5 tasks assigned and it has filled ...
filling the tasks for other work processes is called load balancing..
regards,
anilreddy

ACE load-balancing-Cookie problem

In our other load-balancing environments the load-balancer-cookie contains the encrypted (real) servername or ip-address.
We think it's the same on the cisco, for that reason it's in theory not possible, that there are two 'green'-cookies with different values in the same request.
There are only two possibilities how this could happen:
a) The healthmonitor (http_probe) fails, the loadbalancer 'thinks' that the realserver is down and redistributes the traffic.
But in that case we would expect, that the old cookie will be overwritten by the new one and not simply added to the http-header.
b) The predictor in the serverfarm chooses a new realserver within the same request.
If that is really the cause of that problem this would be bug in the cisco ace.
What we found out, is that the loadbalancer performs a 'Set-Cookie'-Operation an every request even if the client submits the cookie correctly.
For example:
GET /ips-opdata/scripts/jquery.js HTTP/1.1
Host: www.xxxxx.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Ubuntu/10.04 (lucid) Firefox/3.6.15
Accept: */*
Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
Keep-Alive: 115
Connection: keep-alive
Referer: http://www.xxxxx.com/
Cookie: green=R339366665; JSESSIONID=28D91FC6FD62A3921354BB36826294C4
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Set-Cookie: green=R339366665; path=/; expires=Tue, 29-Mar-2011 06:33:00 GMT
Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1
X-Powered-By: Servlet 2.4; JBoss-4.2.2.GA (build: SVNTag=JBoss_4_2_2_GA date=200710221139)/Tomcat-5.5
ETag: W/"72181-1298537508000"
Last-Modified: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 08:51:48 GMT
Content-Type: text/javascript
Content-Length: 72181
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 06:15:19 GMT
As you can see the cookies: green=R339366665 is transmitted from the client, but the loadbalancer does a Set-Cookie Operation of the same cookie once again. This is an unexpected behaviour.
We hope that this helps you to figure out the reason of the problem.

The cookie is sent by the ACE on each response to refresh the timeout value on the client. The value of the cookie doesn't change. This is the expected behaviour and shouldn't break anything in the application / browser.
For browser-based applications, don't forget to add the "browser-expire" parameter to your cookie-based stickyness config.

MPLS TE load-balancing --- CEF Problem

Dears
Would like your assistance please regarding below issue
We are having 5 TE tunnels going to same destination and we are doing load-balancing between these 5 LSPs TE tunnels.
Command "mls ip cef load-sharing full simple" is configured so that CEF will use L4 ports in its algorithm
Problem that due to CEF behavior, 2 link are v.highly utilized and the other 3 utilization are below average
What I am thinking of but not sure If this will help or not is to have 2 TE tunnels instead of 5
1 TE tunnel load balancing on 3 links ( This can be done by using static route to tail loopback poiting to the 3 links) and another TE tunnel load balancing on the other 2 links
By doing this, I think CEF would be used 2 times; first to determine which TE tunnel to use then to determine which link within the tunnel
Will this help ?
For example
interface Tunnel1
ip unnumbered Loopback0
mpls ip
tunnel destination 10.0.0.1
tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng
tunnel mpls traffic-eng autoroute announce
tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 1 dynamic
tunnel mpls traffic-eng fast-reroute
ip route 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 link-1
ip route 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 link-2
ip route 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 link-3

Hello Sherif,
traffic of a single TE tunnel will not be load balanced over multiple physical links as the TE tunnel is setup using a reservation and the path will use only one link for each router hop.
So moving to two TE tunnels is not an option for you.
Hope to help
Giuseppe

Load balancing Client problem

Hi ,
This is my environment two 5508 in HA with release 7.4.121, ap 2600 and ap 3600, in flex-connect wan up local switching.
I put client windows size field to 1 and maximum denial count to 1. i connect many client and when i sniff autentication response on busy AP (ap with many client connected) i can't receive status code 17 from AP ? why ? how cani verify if i client don't honore status code 17 on association response ?
When i enable debug dot11 load-balancing enable i receive for example this log
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jun 23 16:48:12.798: 00:e3:b2:38:d1:52 Load Balancing mobile 00:e3:b2:38:d1:52 on AP c4:14:3c:ca:f4:a0(0) band 1 has 2 users - Good: rssi (antenna-A -73) (antenna-B -73), snr = 23
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jun 23 16:48:12.798: 00:e3:b2:38:d1:52 Load Balancing mobile 00:e3:b2:38:d1:52 on AP 28:34:a2:59:4b:00(0) band 1 has 1 users - Good: rssi (antenna-A -62) (antenna-B -60), snr = 30
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jun 23 16:48:12.798: 00:e3:b2:38:d1:52 Load Balancing mobile 00:e3:b2:38:d1:52 could not find acceptable 802.11a candidate -- defaulting all
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jun 23 16:48:12.798: 00:e3:b2:38:d1:52 Load Balancing mobile 00:e3:b2:38:d1:52 is permitted to associate with AP 28:34:a2:59:4b:00(0) (on Good count=0)
but in association response i receive every time status code 0 (success)
*apfMsConnTask_4: Jun 23 16:48:12.800: 00:e3:b2:38:d1:52 Sending Assoc Response to station on BSSID 28:34:a2:59:4b:05 (status 0) ApVapId 6 Slot 0
who can explain me this problem ? and how can i test this feature better ?

I will try to be clear, How can i verify if my client honore status code 17 on association response ? I try sniffing 802.11 packet but i can't see anything...status code is every time successfull.
My environment is with flexconnect wan up local switching, wlc 5508, ap 3600/2600/1600/1142.

What is load balancing in sap business objects.

Hi friends.
Any one give me correct answer..

Hi,
it depends if you are talking about clustering the processing tiers (& using server groups) to achieve load-balancing, or if you mean using a load balancer in front of the web-tier (typically, Apache Tomcat) ? Also. it could be a software or hardware load balancer.
essentially, it splits the load across the boxes.
regards,
H

Load balancing algorithm problems with servlets

All,
We have a simple servlet which looks up an RMI object from JNDI and invokes
one of its methods in a loop. The RMI object is the HelloClusterImpl
example provided by WebLogic. The servlet basically copies the code from
the HelloClusterClient. In the cluster property file, our load algorithm is
setup to be round-robin. We are using IIS as our web server. If we start
up both servers in the cluster and then use another machine as our client to
call the HelloClusterClient, we see that the calls to HelloClusterImpl
alternate between the two clustered servers. In fact, it is done perfectly
at 50% for each server. When we run the servlet from with the client's
browser, however, it seems as if which ever server in the cluster that
receives the servlet request then takes 100% of the calls to
HelloClusterImpl and there is never any alternating. Although we can verify
that different servers in the cluster receive the servlet request, it seems
as if there is never any altering between the servers during the method
invocations on the HelloClusterImpl servant. Does this seem right?
Shouldn't there be alternating between the servers? Any help would be
greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
-Jon

I have to try this and I will let you.
Thanks
Jon Eagles wrote:
All,
We have a simple servlet which looks up an RMI object from JNDI and invokes
one of its methods in a loop. The RMI object is the HelloClusterImpl
example provided by WebLogic. The servlet basically copies the code from
the HelloClusterClient. In the cluster property file, our load algorithm is
setup to be round-robin. We are using IIS as our web server. If we start
up both servers in the cluster and then use another machine as our client to
call the HelloClusterClient, we see that the calls to HelloClusterImpl
alternate between the two clustered servers. In fact, it is done perfectly
at 50% for each server. When we run the servlet from with the client's
browser, however, it seems as if which ever server in the cluster that
receives the servlet request then takes 100% of the calls to
HelloClusterImpl and there is never any alternating. Although we can verify
that different servers in the cluster receive the servlet request, it seems
as if there is never any altering between the servers during the method
invocations on the HelloClusterImpl servant. Does this seem right?
Shouldn't there be alternating between the servers? Any help would be
greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
-Jon

Weblogic cluster software load balancer

Hi,
We are currently using Weblogic domain as a Proxy Plug-In for High Availability test as it’s explained in this blog http://andrejusb.blogspot.com/2009/04/weblogic-load-balancing-for-oracle-adf.html.
Its working fine for POC project but what software load balancer would you recommended for production environment on Linux? (Assume that we don’t have a hardware load balancer).
- Oracle active-passive OHS web-tier clustering.
-Using Linux open source Linux Software(e.g. HAProxy and KeepAlived as explained here http://biemond.blogspot.com/2010/04/high-availability-load-balancer- for.html
-Using any other software load Balancer
I would appreciate if anybody can provide some recommendations/links etc.
Thanks
Alex

Hi Alex,
Yes you should never use HttpClusterServlet, not even for fun ;-)
We use mod_wl (Web Server Plug-In) for Apache for several customers and that works fine.
Check this:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23943_01/web.1111/e14395/toc.htm
Regards Peter

Load Balancing and WLS primary server offset

I've got a load balancer in front of my WLS cluster, and I'm trying to
          set up load balancing based on WLS clustering. What I need to know to
          do this is the offset within the cookie that's responsible for
          determining which machine within the cluster to direct to.
          Any idea how I can get this information?
          thanks,
          cfraser


Chris Fraser wrote:
          > The proxy/plug-in solution sounds pretty cool, but I've got a high speed
          > Alteon Load Balancer already set up. I would prefer to use that as the load
          > balancer to the WL cluster rather than pay to bring another WLS online to do
          > pretty much what the load balancer, that I already own, can do. I know that
          > going this route means that we're probably not going to be able to do things
          > like failover to the secondary when the primary dies, but we will be able to
          > load balance and also have the ability to dynamically add/delete servers
          > from the list of available servers as they are brought up/down.
          In Memory session replication doesn't work without our plugins. I will have to
          do little bit of investigation to figure out if other persistence mechanism's
          would work without our plugins if you are interested in them. I have to remind
          you though that other types of persistence mechanism's we support are slower
          compared to in memory session replication.
          > Are there any plans to work with an Alteon or a Foundry to have their Load
          > Balancers act as the front end to a WLS cluster?
          Currently none. We are taking steps to make the plugin's and cluster more
          robust, we currently don't have any plans to work with other 3rd party vendors.
          > For us it would be ideal, because we wouldn't have to support another piece of
          > software, we would just
          > have to support the hardware based Alteon, which can handle thousands of
          > transactions per second.
          > I understand that the primary and secondary server information is available
          > in the sessionID, I'm just not quite sure how to extract it.
          This information is saved in the cookie. But I wouldn't count that, as we
          have plans to change this. I cannot give your more details.
          > Is there a particular offset within the session ID where it can always be
          > found?
          I don't quite get what you mean here.
          Hope this helps.
          - Prasad
          > thanks for the help,
          > cfraser
          > ----------
          > C h r i s t o p h e r A . F r a s e r
          > Director, Technology
          > macroplay.com, Inc.
          > [email protected]
          >
          > Viresh Garg wrote:
          >
          > > You should be using
          > > -- NES +NSAPI Plugin
          > > -- IIS + ISAPI Plugin
          > > -- WEblogic server acting as proxy
          > > -- Apache +Apache Plugin ( only in Denali)
          > >
          > > front-ending your Weblogic cluster
          > >
          > > These proxies/plug-ins are smart to do a lot of things like:
          > >
          > > -- Load balancing in weblogic cluster
          > > -- Adding/deleting servers dynamically in cluster when the servers
          > > join/leave Weblogic cluster
          > > -- failover to secondary when primary dies.
          > >
          > > As far as the information about primary and secondary is concerned it is
          > > available in session ID.
          > >
          > > --Viresh Garg
          > >
          > > Chris Fraser wrote:
          > >
          > > > I've got a load balancer in front of my WLS cluster, and I'm trying to
          > > > set up load balancing based on WLS clustering. What I need to know to
          > > > do this is the offset within the cookie that's responsible for
          > > > determining which machine within the cluster to direct to.
          > > >
          > > > Any idea how I can get this information?
          > > >
          > > > thanks,
          > > > cfraser

Load balancing error 88

Dear all,
We are suddenly facing a problem in the PRD system. There user are getting the below error and if they restart there system than it is solved
Load balancing error 88: Cannot connect to message server (rc=9)
few days back We have upgrade the system from ecc5 to ecc6 and its only
Please suggest why the error is coming and how to solved it
Regards,
Kumar

check the /etc/services file for a proper port setting for the R/3 message server "sapms<sid>" at 36xx. You can try connecting the SAPgw directly to the dispatcher at port 32xx where XX is the instance number. If that connection is good, then it appears to be a logon load balancing configuration problem which uses the message server.
This is usually because it cannot connect to the message server. Please check the dev_ms for any errors. if it is intermittent it is likely to be a network problem ( see note 500235 Network Diagnosis with NIPING.
Check following SApnotes :
#n21559: Examination of SAPGUI problems could be useful.
Please also check the note 882741 for the more info about this problem.
following links will help you :
Logon Load Balancing
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/c4/3a64c1505211d189550000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Message Server-Based Logon and Load Balancing (Redirection)
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/43/a95d83e27417b9e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
Best Regards
Niraj

Port Channel Load-Balancing Algorithm (North Bound)

I'm trying to figure out what the load balancing algorithm for the 6100 and 6200 FIs for the Northbound connections. I can't find any documentation on how to change it.
The Nexus 7000s use an 8-bit hash, making it very easy to do something other than 2, 4, or 8 link port channel and get even (at least algorithmically) distribution.
Catalyst switches (not sure about Sup2T though) would use a 1, 2, or 3-bit index, which would skew traffic algorthmically if you used a non-power of 2.
Looking at the 5K documentation, it seems to use the Catalyst style (though haven't been able to confirm). My guess is that whatever is used for the 5Ks is used for the 6100/6200.
Design wise, this would mean you would want to use powers of 2 for your NB uplinks.

Hello Tony,
On UCS FI, it uses " sr-cdest-ip " as the load balancing algorithm and uses 8 parameters for hashing
6248-01-B(nxos)# sh port-channel load-balance
Port Channel Load-Balancing Configuration:
System: source-dest-ip
Port Channel Load-Balancing Addresses Used Per-Protocol:
Non-IP: source-dest-mac
IP: source-dest-ip source-dest-mac
6248-01-B(nxos)# show platform fwm info pc port-channel 1
dump pc info: if_index 369098752 dump_all 0 verbose 1
Po1: state 0x0 #pifs 1 fwimpd ctx 0x9666c1c
Po1: hash params - l2_da 1 l2_sa 1 l3_da 1 l3_sa 1
Po1: hash params - l4_da 1 l4_sa 1 xor_sa_da 1 hash_elect 1
I could not find an option to change these values.
Padma

Load balancing check

could anyone tell me what is load balancing check..! its urgent.
Best regards!

Depends of the subject.
The load balancing is a method of distribution of the queries between servers.
Fred

Service Request - Load balancing weight & TM labour schedule

What is Load balancing weight? How does it work, (I think it must be w.r.t the selecting resources for assigning the task, But how does it work, I am not getting the help menu in this)
How does the T&M labour schedule is managed
Regards

Hi,
1. I had some time and setup your config. Load Balancing seems to work fine for me. I tried to work with 4 different clients.
WHat I did to set it up:
# Failover RG for shared address
scrgadm -a -g proftp-srg -h mars,saturn
scrgadm -a -S -j hafast_r -g proftp-srg -l hafast
# Scalable RG for proftpd
scrgadm -a -g proftp-rg -y Maximum_primaries=2 -y Desired_primaries=2 -h mars,saturn -y RG_dependencies=proftp-srg
scrgadm -a -j proftp_r -g proftp-rg -t SUNW.gds -y Network_resources_used=hafast_r -y Port_l
ist=4443/tcp -x Start_command=/usr/local/sbin/proftpd -x Probe_command=/bin/true -y Scalable=true -y Load_balancing_policy=Lb_sticky_wild
I assume that the key is the Lb_sticky_wild setting. As proftp forks new processes for every connection and even does reconnects during operation with new ports this seems to be essential. Please try
2. It was not considered an excellent idea to configure ftp as a scalable service. Reason is that you now have network traffic load balanced. Question is: how do you configure shared storage. Do you have one (1) underlying global filesystem??? That could be a bottleneck. Check it out.
Regards
Hartmut
PS: BTW I used proftp 1.3.0

ACE Load Balancing Problem

Hi,
I have ACE 4701 with c4710ace-mz.A3_2_2.bin image. In the current setup ACE is located in the center of network where all the WAN, Intenret and LAN is connected and ACE has default towards Internet and All other segment has default route towards ACE appliance. ACe is only redirecting the port 80 traffic to my Proxy server and bypass my lan subnet on port 80.
Internet
i
i
i
i
i
ACE--------------------------------WAN
i
i
i
i
LAN
I want to use ACE for the load balancing of two servers. Today I did the load balancing configuration but as soon as I applied the policy map on the interface vlan 200 and 300, my complete network reachability went down. When I remove the policy my network came back to normal.
192.168.200.66 FAX Server-1
192.1168.200.67 FAX Server-2
192.168.200.65   Virtual IP address
Attached is the configuration that I did on ACE for the load balancing and below is the current configuration of the ACE appliance.
access-list acl-in remark ACCESS LIST FOR ACE-INSIDE
access-list acl-in line 1 extended permit ip any any
access-list acl-out remark ACCESS LIST FOR ACE-OUTSIDE
access-list acl-out line 1 extended permit ip any any
access-list acl-proxy remark ACCESS LIST FOR PROXY SEGMENT
access-list acl-proxy line 1 extended permit ip any any
access-list acl-wan remark ACCESS LIST FOR WAN SEGMENT
access-list acl-wan line 1 extended permit ip any any
probe tcp PROBE_5050
port 5050
interval 15
passdetect interval 60
open 1
probe tcp PROBE_5101
port 5101
interval 15
passdetect interval 60
open 1
probe tcp PROBE_TCP
port 80
interval 15
passdetect interval 60
open 1
parameter-map type http PARAMAP_CASE
case-insensitive
no persistence-rebalance
rserver host RS_BCPR01
ip address 192.168.0.103
inservice
rserver host RS_BCPR02
ip address 192.168.0.104
inservice
rserver host RT_fax1
description Right Fax Server-1
ip address 192.168.200.66
rserver host RT_fax2
description Right Fax Server-2
ip address 192.168.200.67
serverfarm host SF_BCPR
transparent
probe PROBE_5050
probe PROBE_5101
probe PROBE_TCP
rserver RS_BCPR01
inservice
rserver RS_BCPR02
inservice
serverfarm host SF_RT_fax
rserver RT_fax1
rserver RT_fax2
sticky ip-netmask 255.255.255.255 address source STICKY-SOURCE
replicate sticky
serverfarm SF_BCPR
sticky ip-netmask 255.255.255.255 address source FAX-STICKY
replicate sticky
serverfarm SF_RT_fax
class-map type management match-any CM_ALL
2 match protocol snmp any
3 match protocol http any
4 match protocol https any
5 match protocol icmp any
6 match protocol telnet any
class-map match-any CM_BYPASS_FOR_LAN
3 match virtual-address 100.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 tcp eq www
8 match virtual-address 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 tcp eq www
9 match virtual-address 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 tcp eq www
10 match virtual-address 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 tcp eq www
class-map match-any CM_BYPASS_SUBNET
9 match virtual-address 100.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 tcp eq www
13 match virtual-address 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 tcp eq www
14 match virtual-address 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 tcp eq www
15 match virtual-address 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 tcp eq www
class-map match-any CM_IM
2 match virtual-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 tcp eq 5050
3 match virtual-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 tcp eq 1080
4 match virtual-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 tcp eq 5101
class-map match-all CM_SF_BCPR
255 match virtual-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 tcp eq www
class-map match-any RT_FAX
2 match virtual-address 192.168.200.65 0.0.0.0 any
policy-map type management first-match PM_ALL
class CM_ALL
permit
policy-map type loadbalance http first-match PM_L7_BYPASS_FOR_LAN_HTTP
class class-default
forward
policy-map type loadbalance http first-match PM_L7_BYPASS_HTTP
class class-default
forward
policy-map type loadbalance first-match PM_LB_RT_FAX
class class-default
sticky-serverfarm FAX-STICKY
policy-map type loadbalance http first-match PM_LB_SF_BCPROXY
class class-default
sticky-serverfarm STICKY-SOURCE
policy-map multi-match PM_BYPASS_FOR_LAN_HTTP
class CM_BYPASS_FOR_LAN
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy PM_L7_BYPASS_FOR_LAN_HTTP
policy-map multi-match PM_BYPASS_HTTP
class CM_BYPASS_SUBNET
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy PM_L7_BYPASS_HTTP
policy-map multi-match PM_MAIN_BCPROXY
class CM_SF_BCPR
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy PM_LB_SF_BCPROXY
loadbalance vip icmp-reply active
appl-parameter http advanced-options PARAMAP_CASE
class CM_IM
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy PM_LB_SF_BCPROXY
policy-map multi-match PM_RT_FAX
class RT_FAX
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy PM_LB_RT_FAX
service-policy input PM_ALL
interface vlan 100
description FW-INSIDE CONTEXT RACK1
ip address 192.168.0.5 255.255.255.224
alias 192.168.0.11 255.255.255.224
peer ip address 192.168.0.6 255.255.255.224
mac-address autogenerate
no icmp-guard
access-group input acl-out
no shutdown
interface vlan 200
description WAN-VLAN CONTEXT RACK1
ip address 192.168.0.33 255.255.255.224
alias 192.168.0.43 255.255.255.224
peer ip address 192.168.0.34 255.255.255.224
mac-address autogenerate
access-group input acl-wan
service-policy input PM_BYPASS_HTTP
service-policy input PM_MAIN_BCPROXY
no shutdown
interface vlan 300
description ACE-INSIDE CONTEXT RACK1
ip address 192.168.0.65 255.255.255.224
alias 192.168.0.73 255.255.255.224
peer ip address 192.168.0.66 255.255.255.224
mac-address autogenerate
access-group input acl-in
service-policy input PM_BYPASS_FOR_LAN_HTTP
service-policy input PM_BYPASS_HTTP
service-policy input PM_MAIN_BCPROXY
no shutdown
interface vlan 301
description BC-VLAN CONTEXT RACK1
ip address 192.168.0.97 255.255.255.224
alias 192.168.0.107 255.255.255.224
peer ip address 192.168.0.98 255.255.255.224
mac-address autogenerate
access-group input acl-proxy
no shutdown
ft track interface TRACKING_FOR_FT_VLAN
track-interface vlan 300
peer track-interface vlan 300
priority 255
peer priority 255
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1
Please help me out what i am missing. Is there any limitation on policy map or my bypass subnet list is creating problem.

I did these changes this time nothing disconnected but I am not able to do the Remote desktop on the virtual IP address. Real IP has Remote desktop enabled even VIP is not ping able for me.
rserver host RT_fax1
description Right Fax Server-1
ip address 192.168.200.66
inservice
rserver host RT_fax2
description Right Fax Server-2
ip address 192.168.200.67
inservice
serverfarm host SF_RT_fax
rserver RT_fax1
    inservice
rserver RT_fax2
    inservice
policy-map type loadbalance rdp first-match PM_LB_RT_FAX
class class-default
    serverfarm SF_RT_fax
policy-map multi-match PM_RT_FAX
class RT_FAX
    loadbalance vip inservice
    loadbalance policy PM_LB_RT_FAX
    loadbalance vip icmp-reply active
interface vlan 200
description WAN-VLAN CONTEXT RACK1
ip address 192.168.0.33 255.255.255.224
alias 192.168.0.43 255.255.255.224
peer ip address 192.168.0.34 255.255.255.224
mac-address autogenerate
access-group input acl-wan
service-policy input PM_BYPASS_HTTP
service-policy input PM_MAIN_BCPROXY
service-policy input PM_RT_FAX
no shutdown
interface vlan 300
description ACE-INSIDE CONTEXT RACK1
ip address 192.168.0.65 255.255.255.224
alias 192.168.0.73 255.255.255.224
peer ip address 192.168.0.66 255.255.255.224
mac-address autogenerate
access-group input acl-in
service-policy input PM_BYPASS_FOR_LAN_HTTP
service-policy input PM_BYPASS_HTTP
service-policy input PM_MAIN_BCPROXY
service-policy input PM_RT_FAX
no shutdown
But nothing is working for me. Please help me out. This time i didnt configure the sticky. But in real I will go with sticky and complete IP protocol will be use a VIP. Please help me out.

What is load balancing "stickyness" problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for