What is "reliable message" wait event?
Hi, all.
What is "reliable message" wait event?
The wait class is "Other", not "Idle".
From time to time, I can see "reliable message" wait event
in the Top 5 Timed Events section from AWR reports.
In addition, what is "CPU time" in the Top 5 Timed Events section?
Thanks and Regards.
Message was edited by:
user507290
Dear Yas.
Thanks for your reply.
The database is 2 node RAC database (10.2.0.2.0) on 32 bit windows 2003 EE SP1.
Does "AQ" mean Streams AQ???
Can I disable Streams AQ facility??
Thanks and Regards.
Message was edited by:
user507290
Message was edited by:
user507290
Similar Messages
-
What is "reliable message" wait event in 10g??
Hi, all.
The database is 2 node RAC 10.2.0.2.0 on 32-bit windows 2003 EE SP1.
From time to time, I see "reliable message" wait event on the
"Top 5 Timed Events" section from AWR report.
The wait class is "Other".
There seems to be no manuals and html links explaining "reliable message"
wait event.
Thanks and Regards.
Message was edited by:
user507290
Message was edited by:
user507290Metalink Doc 461052.1 is a fairly lightweight walk-through of a system resource profiling tool called LTOM, the "Lite Onboard Monitor". It has an appendix in which it simply points out "The following events were considered idle and ignored... reliable message..."
It also says that if you want to include something for wait analysis, just take it out of the list of idle and ignored events... so it's not exactly saying that the thing is an idle event, just that it was treated as such for the purposes of writing that document but that you might think differently.
On the other hand, this page:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14237/waitevents003.htm
...is 10g Release 2's description of "wait events of greatest interest"... and "reliable message" isn't on it! From which one concludes, I suppose, that it isn't of great interest! -
When there is archiving done to the recovery area, there is "rdbms ipc message" wait event spike.
What to conclude from it?
Wait Class Wait Event P1 Text P1 P2 Text P2 P3 Text P3 Wait Time (ms)
System I/O log file parallel write files 2 blocks 4096 requests 2 10
Idle rdbms ipc message timeout 150 0 0 90
System I/O log file parallel write files 2 blocks 4096 requests 2 10
Idle rdbms ipc message timeout 161 0 0 100
System I/O log file parallel write files 2 blocks 4096 requests 2 10
Idle rdbms ipc message timeout 181 0 0 190
System I/O log file parallel write files 2 blocks 4096 requests 4 10
Idle rdbms ipc message timeout 191 0 0 90
System I/O log file parallel write files 2 blocks 4096 requests 2 10
Idle rdbms ipc message timeout 201 0 0 90
ThanksYou can use the following details
Wait Class Wait Event P1 Text P1 P2 Wait Time(ms)
System I/O log file parallel write files 2 4096 10
Idle rdbms ipc message timeout 150 0 90
System I/O log file parallel write files 2 4096 10
Idle rdbms ipc message timeout 161 0 100
System I/O log file parallel write files 2 4096 10
Idle rdbms ipc message timeout 181 0 190
System I/O log file parallel write files 2 4096 10
Idle rdbms ipc message timeout 191 0 90
System I/O log file parallel write files 2 4096 10
Idle rdbms ipc message timeout 201 0 90 -
About single-task message wait event
Hello
I have several active users, some of them from 2 an 3 days ago with single-task message wait event and their last_call was many time ago. One of users, blocked to other users just a little while ago and Concurrency grow up to 20 % and was on increase. i had to kill this user and all were well, concurrency dessapeared.
How could I avoid this behavior??
How could I kill these type of user by automatic way??
ThanksHi,
according to me active user is different
according to me active user is session or oracle process is doing something else like dml or ddl execution or select stmt else session is idel.
trace the session what is doing? is may be problem with dead connection
use oradebug and set the 10046 at level 12 and format it with tkprof utility.
paste it thread
Kind Regards,
Rakesh jayappa -
Single-Task Message Wait Event
Discovered while researching some performance issues....
A statspack report on the metadata repository is showing a lot of single-task message waits.
Is this normal? What is the source of these waits?
Per Oracle 8i documentation... "Oracle is diminishing the support of single-task mode."
Why is this showing up in a 9.2.0.8 database???
Any insights welcome...
Thanks,
Henry
Edited by: OracleDBAinPA on Dec 8, 2009 6:56 AMAs you can see, no one replied to the message...
But, our performance issue was due to a memory leak in the listener (documented bug in 9.2.0.8).
Restarting the listener, also reduced the wait... -
Hello SAP Community,
I start by mentioning a few details about the system I'll be talking about in this subject:
- SAP NetWeaver 7.0
- Oracle Database 10.2g
I was reading the following Note: "Note 618868 - FAQ: Oracle performance", in order to try to understand what's causing the oracle database to have slow performance.
While reading section 3 "How can I determine whether the general database performance can be optimized?" I found out that the ratio of "Busy wait time to CPU time" is away above the recommended 60:40 value. I'm getting a 94:6 ratio. This value was calculated using the query:
SELECT
ROUND((STM1.VALUE - STM2.VALUE) / 1000000) "BUSY WAIT TIME (S)",
ROUND(STM2.VALUE / 1000000) "CPU TIME (S)",
ROUND((STM1.VALUE - STM2.VALUE) / STM1.VALUE * 100) || ' : ' ||
ROUND(STM2.VALUE / STM1.VALUE * 100) RATIO
FROM V$SYS_TIME_MODEL STM1, V$SYS_TIME_MODEL STM2
WHERE STM1.STAT_NAME = 'DB time' AND STM2.STAT_NAME = 'DB CPU';
With such high values, SAP recommends to improve system performance doing some "wait event tuning".
Can someone give me some directions about this subject? Some guides specific to this subject would be nice. Any further information about my system you may require, please ask me.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Daniel GarridoHello again,
Before I did any changes to the Oracle's parameters I checked the Note 619188 - FAQ: Oracle wait events, to understand what could be causing such high event wait time.
With the query:
SELECT EVENT, TOTAL_WAITS, TIME_WAITED, AVG_MS,
ROUND(RATIO_TO_REPORT(TIME_WAITED) OVER () * 100) PERCENT
FROM (SELECT SUBSTR(EVENT, 1, 30) EVENT, TOTAL_WAITS, TIME_WAITED,
ROUND(TIME_WAITED_MICRO / TOTAL_WAITS / 1000, 2) AVG_MS
FROM V$SYSTEM_EVENT
WHERE WAIT_CLASS NOT IN ('Idle', 'System I/O')
UNION
SELECT 'CPU' EVENT, NULL, VALUE, NULL
FROM V$SYSSTAT
WHERE STATISTIC# = 12
ORDER BY 3 DESC)
WHERE ROWNUM <=10;
I got the non-idle events that took more time in my system and the result was:
Result of the SELECT statement
EVENT
TOTAL_WAITS
TIME_WAITED
AVG_MS
PERCENT
log file switch (archiving nee
578.686
57.850.863
999.69
80
buffer busy waits
712.163
6.420.932
90.16
9
CPU
0
2.791.238
4
db file sequential read
4.005.546
1.746.442
4.36
2
log file sync
10.176.490
1.577.177
1.55
2
enq: TX - row lock contention
854.451
642.955
7.52
1
db file scattered read
1.055.533
621.332
5.89
1
enq: CF - contention
210.085
246.910
11.75
0
read by other session
561.558
119.910
2.14
0
log file switch completion
10.777
85.843
79.65
0
So most of the TIME_WAITED for wait events was because of the "log file switch (archiving needed)", after reading what could cause such wait event, I understood this was related with a problem I previously had in the server, where the archiving folder was with no space left. (Meanwhile the backup of the archives is being done and so the folder is being cleaned on a daily basis).
Thank you all for your help! -
Hi all,
We have a 2 node RAC 10.2.0.3 database.From quite sometime we are experiencing "transaction" wait event apart from "enq:TX".
What is this "transaction wait event"? How does it differ from enq:TX row lock contention event. I have searched a lot but couldn't find any proper document to describe it.
Has any one encountered this event before?
Thanks.Yasir Hashmi wrote:
Hi all,
We have a 2 node RAC 10.2.0.3 database.From quite sometime we are experiencing "transaction" wait event apart from "enq:TX".
What is this "transaction wait event"? How does it differ from enq:TX row lock contention event. I have searched a lot but couldn't find any proper document to describe it.
Has any one encountered this event before?
Thanks.what SQL produces this event?
against which object type does this wait occur?
do as below so we can know complete Oracle version & OS name.
Post via COPY & PASTE complete results of
SELECT * from v$version; -
What is "KJC: Wait for msg .." wait event in 10g??
Hi, all.
The database is 2 node RAC database (10.2.0.2.0)
on 32-bit windows 2003 EE SP1.
I found "KJC: Wait for msg sends to complete" wait event in
"Top 5 Timed Event" Section from AWR report.
What is "KJC: Wait for msg sends to complete" wait event??
The following is from UDUMP.
Dump file d:\oracle\product\10.2.0\admin\rac\udump\rac2_ora_5656.trc
Mon Sep 24 00:04:40 2007
ORACLE V10.2.0.2.0 - Production vsnsta=0
vsnsql=14 vsnxtr=3
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
With the Real Application Clusters, OLAP and Data Mining options
Windows Server 2003 Version V5.2 Service Pack 1
CPU : 4 - type 586, 2 Physical Cores
Process Affinity : 0x00000000
Memory (Avail/Total): Ph:5278M/8190M, Ph+PgF:6596M/10041M, VA:316M/2047M
Instance name: rac2
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 2
Oracle process number: 64
Windows thread id: 5656, image: ORACLE.EXE (SHAD)
*** 2007-09-24 00:04:40.156
*** ACTION NAME:() 2007-09-24 00:04:40.156
*** MODULE NAME:(OEM.SystemPool) 2007-09-24 00:04:40.156
*** SERVICE NAME:(RAC.world) 2007-09-24 00:04:40.156
*** CLIENT ID:() 2007-09-24 00:04:40.156
*** SESSION ID:(486.53) 2007-09-24 00:04:40.156
IPCSendMsg: could not initiate send on conn 0x5b0d3e98 to node [rac1 : 696 : 3996 : 359937], err 10054
IPCGetRequestInfo: failed a request rqh(0x5b060db8), type(6), status(2), bytes(0)
Thanks and Regards.
Message was edited by:
user507290
Message was edited by:
user507290This might have something to do with bug 5075434 - Small performance overhead in RAC (waits for "KJC: Wait for msg sends to complete").
Check metalink for further details. -
Reliable message - Top first timed events
Hi All,
One fo my Db having reliable message as top first timed events. Does anyone have an idea about this cause and the solution for this . Please do the needful.
Event Waits Time(s) Avg wait (ms) % DB time Wait Class
reliable message 685,139 24,625 36 29.58 Other
Thankshttp://arulselvaraj.blogspot.com/2011/01/drop-tablespace-waiting-on-reliable.html
-
What's wrong from this wait event
Please,
Below are two tables showing respectively database wait event by wait class and session wait event by wait class.
1. Database wait event by wait class
WAIT TOTAL PCT TIME PCT
CLASS WAITS WAITS WAITED_SECS TIME
Application 7427 .08 1572.45 76.29
User I/O 50416 .57 193.24 9.38
Network 8714874 98.66 177.67 8.62
System I/O 48169 .55 85.98 4.17
2. Session wait event by wait class
SID USER WAIT TOTAL TIME_
NAME CLASS WAITS WAITED_SECS
318 PMS1000 Application 110 321.64
259 PMS1000 Application 81 212.8
318 PMS1000 Network 541943 31.8
259 PMS1000 Network 258368 17.76
258 PMS1000 Network 132774 9.34
318 PMS1000 User I/O 1392 7.49
Top Events found:
CPU + WAIT for CPU
ROW lock contention
SQL*Net more data from/to client
Question:
What may cause the application wait_class to be at the top?, event though the row lock contention was found ?
I also think the system may sufering from a network bottleneck, I also thinking to set SDU parameter, but the network is 1Gb speed, and I don't know if this can help.
Does someone give me some clue to pinpoint what is going wrong wiht the above stats?
thanks enoughuser552326
I've used the "code" tags to make your first section of data more readable:
WAIT TOTAL PCT TIME PCT
CLASS WAITS WAITS WAITED_SECS TIME
Application 7427 .08 1572.45 76.29
User I/O 50416 .57 193.24 9.38
Network 8714874 98.66 177.67 8.62
System I/O 48169 .55 85.98 4.17 If you want to know what events belong to each wait class you can query v$event_name:
select wait_class, name
from v$event_name
order by wait_class, nameThe events in class "Application" are:
SQL*Net break/reset to client
SQL*Net break/reset to dblink
Streams capture: filter callback waiting for ruleset
Streams: apply reader waiting for DDL to apply
Wait for Table Lock
enq: KO - fast object checkpoint
enq: PW - flush prewarm buffers
enq: RO - contention
enq: RO - fast object reuse
enq: TM - contention
enq: TX - row lock contention
enq: UL - contention
As you can see, this is consistent with your comment about the top event being "row lock contention". The implication of the name given to this wait class is that it is your application design that is causing the problem. Your biggest problem is that your code allows your users to lock each other out.
Looking at the summary numbers, the time spent on waiting for other users to get out of the way is a very large fraction of your total wait - until you deal with that, problems relating to I/O and network appear to be pretty irrelevant. Having said that, you seem to do a very large number of round-trips on the network - so maybe the amount of time you are losing is not hugely significant compared to the amount of work you are getting done. (You didn't actually tell us how long it took or how many concurrent users, to accumulate this wait time).
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk -
What is ges reusing os pid wait event
What is wait event "ges reusing os pid". In our RAC environment it is one of the top wait events. How to minimze it.
This is a wait event in Oracle 10g for Global Enqueue Services (ges) waiting on an operating system process id (os pid).
How to resolve this issue? I checked the bug list on Metalink and there is a patch set for the issue that may help.
Question: what version and patch release are you running for Oracle RAC?
Also, you probably want to tune your public network and private interconnects between the nodes in your Oracle RAC cluster.
Regards,
Ben Prusinski
http://oracle-magician.blogspot.com/ -
What is "ges enter server mode" wait event..
I cannot find 'ges enter server mode' wait event definition.
What is it?10g onwards, Instance recovery is done in two phases. First phase scans the blocks to be recoverd and applied from rdo log files and the second phase actually does that.
In a RAC instance the during the instance recovery, first pass scan can be delayed by 300ms-1.5s waiting on GRD (Global resource directory). During that time SMAON enters the wait event which is called "ges enter server mode" . -
"lms flush message acks" wait event
Dear All,
We are load testing our application in 10.2.0.1 database with 2 node RAC, in the AWR report top 5 wait event, we are getting "lms flush message acks" 90%.
I did search in google and metalink, but i could not able to find any related notes.
Please help..
Thanks,
Anand.[email protected] wrote:
We are load testing our application in 10.2.0.1 database with 2 node RAC, in the AWR report top 5 wait event, we are getting "lms flush message acks" 90%.
Something is waiting for the "other" node to acknowledge a "flush" message - so you need to look at the other node to see if you can see anything that might cause the flush message to see a slow response.
Of course, there may be congestion on the interconnect - but then various other RAC communications would also be slow - so it's more likely that the "flushing" is slow.
Reasons for flushing - we are telling the other node to clear part of its buffer cache, this might be related to frequent truncate commands (as the top of a shortlist). If you truncate an object, any dirty blocks for that object have to be written to disc, and any clean blocks have to be flushed from the cache; in a RAC environment the other nodes have to be told to do the same and your session has to wait for them to complete the write and flush.
In your case, you might check the code for frequency truncates - and check to see if you can see evidence for frequent slow write from dbwr (and also from lgwr) on the remote node.
Since you're running an early version of 10.2, I think problems of this type can even be related to truncates on global temporary tables due to some bugs that weren't fixed until 10.2.0.3. (And I think there were some problems with dynamic remastering in that version too, which caused similar flushing issues).
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
To post code, statspack/AWR report, execution plans or trace files, start and end the section with the tag {noformat}{noformat} (lowercase, curly brackets, no spaces) so that the text appears in fixed format.
"Science is more than a body of knowledge; it is a way of thinking"
Carl Sagan -
What do the wait events 'gc cr failure' and 'cr request retry' mean?
I'm trying to troubleshoot an issue for a customer. Environment is Oracle 10.2.0.4 (64-bit) on Redhat 5. Two node RAC cluster. The 10046 trace file shows lots of 'gc current block 2-way' waits but also a few 'gc cr failure' and 'cr request retry' waits. The 'cr request retry' waits take about 0.9 seconds each. I cannot find much if any information on these two wait events. Any help is much appreciated.
Thanks!Hi,
Also, you might need to check the protocol is being used for the interconnect communication.
here are the steps just in case:
$ORACLE_HOME/bin/sqlplus / as sysdba
oradebug setmypid
oradebug unlimit
oradebug ipc
oradebug TRACEFILE_NAME
Review the file that the last oradebug gave you back.
Metalink note 181489.1 provides some handy steps to analyze your situation. (also contains the latest supported protocols for IPC)
Hope this helps
Regards,
Jozsef -
Hi ! I have the following wait events in my top timed and I don't know who originated them:
Wait Event Wait Time Summary Avg Wait Time (ms)
I# Class Event Waits %Timeouts Total(s) Avg(ms) %DB time Avg Min Max Std Dev Cnt
* DB CPU N/A N/A 59,651.48 N/A 45.87 2
User I/O db file sequential read 4,369,213 0.0 20,831.46 4.8 16.02 4.72 4.29 5.14 0.60 2
Other enq: CF - contention 155,822 3.9 10,390.74 66.7 7.99 68.62 60.31 76.94 11.76 2
System I/O RMAN backup & recovery I/O 87,205 0.0 5,477.09 62.8 9.15 62.81 62.81 62.81 1
Cluster gc current block 2-way 2,914,457 0.0 4,811.61 1.7 3.70 1.67 1.60 1.74 0.10 2
System I/O control file sequential read 3,038,672 0.0 3,762.66 1.2 2.89 1.24 1.22 1.27 0.04 2
Concurrenc os thread startup 2,842 0.0 3,695.14 1300.2 2.84 1311.83 1143.07 1480.59 238.66 2
System I/O log file parallel write 1,341,907 0.0 2,530.17 1.9 1.95 1.88 1.88 1.89 0.01 2
Other reliable message 471,495 0.1 2,388.01 5.1 1.84 5.08 4.12 6.03 1.35 2
Concurrenc row cache lock 3,135,774 0.0 2,224.53 0.7 1.71 0.72 0.68 0.75 0.05 2
1 DB CPU N/A N/A 22,584.30 N/A 37.75
User I/O db file sequential read 2,451,215 0.0
System I/O RMAN backup & recovery I/O 87,205 0.0
Other enq: CF - contention 59,735 5.3
Cluster gc current block 2-way 1,803,542 0.0
System I/O control file sequential read 1,831,180 0.0
Concurrenc os thread startup 1,323 0.0
System I/O log file parallel write 727,883 0.0
Cluster gc cr multi block request 523,744 0.0
Concurrenc row cache lock 1,830,913 0.0
2 DB CPU N/A N/A
User I/O db file sequential read 1,917,998 0.0
Other enq: CF - contention 96,087 3.0
Cluster gc current block 2-way 1,110,915 0.0
Concurrenc os thread startup 1,519 0.0
System I/O control file sequential read 1,207,492 0.0
User I/O direct path read 404,587 0.0
Other reliable message 233,033 0.1
System I/O log file parallel write 614,024 0.0
System I/O control file parallel write 128,905 0.0
Those are the most worrying events:
enq: CF - contention
I/O control file sequential read
Concurrenc os thread startup
I have been investigating and I wonder what is wrong to get Concurrenc os thread startup. According to one blog, os thread should be always related with network issues...
The awr snapshot is from my production window day.
Rac 11.2.0.3 two nodes on Solaris Sparc 10.I have studied the ASH in the problematic period and I have found that there are some full scans:
Summary of All User Input
Format : TEXT
DB Id : 2752323407
Inst num : 1
Begin time : 08-Feb-13 09:30:00
End time : 08-Feb-13 10:20:00
Slot width : Default
Report targets : 0
Report name : ashrpt_1_0208_1020.txt
ASH Report For dbp/dbp1
DB Name DB Id Instance Inst Num Release RAC Host
dbp 2752323407 dbp1 1 11.2.0.3.0 YES host-dbp-1
CPUs SGA Size Buffer Cache Shared Pool ASH Buffer Size
16 12,651M (100%) 10,048M (79.4%) 1,921M (15.2%) 32.0M (0.3%)
Analysis Begin Time: 08-Feb-13 09:30:00
Analysis End Time: 08-Feb-13 10:20:00
Elapsed Time: 50.0 (mins)
Begin Data Source: DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY
in AWR snapshot 5100
End Data Source: DBA_HIST_ACTIVE_SESS_HISTORY
in AWR snapshot 5101
+ V$ACTIVE_SESSION_HISTORY
Sample Count: 10,069
Average Active Sessions: 33.56
Avg. Active Session per CPU: 2.10
Report Target: None specified
Top User Events DB/Inst: dbp/dbp1 (Feb 08 09:30 to 10:20)
Avg Active
Event Event Class % Event Sessions
library cache lock Concurrency 43.73 14.68
cursor: pin S wait on X Concurrency 18.61 6.25
CPU + Wait for CPU CPU 15.77 5.29
reliable message Other 5.88 1.97
enq: KO - fast object checkpoint Application 3.48 1.17
Top Background Events DB/Inst: dbp/dbp1 (Feb 08 09:30 to 10:20)
Avg Active
Event Event Class % Activity Sessions
CPU + Wait for CPU CPU 1.25 0.42
Top Cluster Events DB/Inst: dbp/dbp1 (Feb 08 09:30 to 10:20)
Event % Event Remote I % Activity
gc current block 2-way 1.72 2 1.72
gc cr grant 2-way 1.58 N/A 1.07
Top Event P1/P2/P3 Values DB/Inst: dbp/dbp1 (Feb 08 09:30 to 10:20)
Event % Event P1 Value, P2 Value, P3 Value % Activity
Parameter 1 Parameter 2 Parameter 3
library cache lock 43.75 "29115227816","29218763456"," 1.22
handle address lock address 100*mode+namespace
"29115227816","28694732944"," 1.20
"29115227816","28812373936"," 1.17
cursor: pin S wait on X 18.61 "1497800770","3934190043136", 1.54
idn value where
"1497800770","7773890805760", 1.15
reliable message 6.07 "30432532808","30354909248"," 0.13
channel context channel handle broadcast message
enq: KO - fast object checkpoi 3.49 "1263468550","65640","1" 0.52
name|mode 2 0
db file sequential read 1.81 "1","25220","1" 0.01
file# block# blocks
Top Service/Module DB/Inst: dbp/dbp1 (Feb 08 09:30 to 10:20)
Service Module % Activity Action % Action
dbp_DVEBMGS11 CL_SQL_STATEMENT======== 86.80 383 86.80
dbp_D10_0066 CL_SQL_STATEMENT======== 6.28 383 3.34
104 2.94
dbp_D10_0064 CL_SQL_STATEMENT======== 2.40 383 2.39
SYS$BACKGROUND UNNAMED 1.51 UNNAMED 1.51
Top Client IDs DB/Inst: dbp/dbp1 (Feb 08 09:30 to 10:20)
No data exists for this section of the report.
Top SQL Command Types DB/Inst: dbp/dbp1 (Feb 08 09:30 to 10:20)
-> 'Distinct SQLIDs' is the count of the distinct number of SQLIDs
with the given SQL Command Type found over all the ASH samples
in the analysis period
Distinct Avg Active
SQL Command Type SQLIDs % Activity Sessions
SELECT 485 94.56 31.74
ALTER TABLE 220 2.89 0.97
Top Phases of Execution DB/Inst: dbp/dbp1 (Feb 08 09:30 to 10:20)
Avg Active
Phase of Execution % Activity Sessions
Parse 67.50 22.66
SQL Execution 30.46 10.22
Hard Parse 5.37 1.80
Top Remote Instances DB/Inst: dbp/dbp1 (Feb 08 09:30 to 10:20)
Wait Class % Wait Remote I % Activity
Cluster 5.22 2 3.90
N/A 1.27
Top SQL with Top Events DB/Inst: dbp/dbp1 (Feb 08 09:30 to 10:20)
Sampled #
SQL ID Planhash of Executions % Activity
Event % Event Top Row Source % RwSrc
350v06jcnd822 N/A 0 18.03
library cache lock 9.41 ** Row Source Not Available ** 9.41
SELECT "DT"."SID_0CALMONTH" AS "S____048" ,"D3"."SID_0MATERIAL" AS "S____006" ,
"DU"."SID_0UNIT" AS "S____023" ,"DT"."SID_0CALDAY" AS "S____021" ,"D2"."SID_0MET
YPE" AS "S____1342" ,"D2"."SID_0VTYPE" AS "S____504" ,"X33"."S__Z99GRMAT" AS "S_
___4443" , SUM ( "F"."QUANTITY" ) AS "Z____1299" , COUNT( * ) AS "Z____016"
N/A 0 18.03
cursor: pin S wait on X 8.62 ** Row Source Not Available ** 8.62
SELECT "DT"."SID_0CALMONTH" AS "S____048" ,"D3"."SID_0MATERIAL" AS "S____006" ,
"DU"."SID_0UNIT" AS "S____023" ,"DT"."SID_0CALDAY" AS "S____021" ,"D2"."SID_0MET
YPE" AS "S____1342" ,"D2"."SID_0VTYPE" AS "S____504" ,"X33"."S__Z99GRMAT" AS "S_
___4443" , SUM ( "F"."QUANTITY" ) AS "Z____1299" , COUNT( * ) AS "Z____016"
48unmtd983uz6 N/A 0 16.75
library cache lock 12.87 ** Row Source Not Available ** 12.87
SELECT "DT"."SID_0CALDAY" AS "S____021" ,"DT"."SID_0CALMONTH" AS "S____048" ,"D
3"."SID_0MATERIAL" AS "S____006" ,"DU"."SID_0UNIT" AS "S____023" ,"D2"."SID_0MET
YPE" AS "S____1342" ,"D2"."SID_0VTYPE" AS "S____504" , SUM ( "F"."QUANTITY" )
AS "Z____1299" , COUNT( * ) AS "Z____016" FROM "/BIC/FZ99IC114" "F" JOIN "/BIC
N/A 0 16.75
cursor: pin S wait on X 3.88 ** Row Source Not Available ** 3.88
SELECT "DT"."SID_0CALDAY" AS "S____021" ,"DT"."SID_0CALMONTH" AS "S____048" ,"D
3"."SID_0MATERIAL" AS "S____006" ,"DU"."SID_0UNIT" AS "S____023" ,"D2"."SID_0MET
YPE" AS "S____1342" ,"D2"."SID_0VTYPE" AS "S____504" , SUM ( "F"."QUANTITY" )
AS "Z____1299" , COUNT( * ) AS "Z____016" FROM "/BIC/FZ99IC114" "F" JOIN "/BIC
350v06jcnd822 2426825131 0 15.49
library cache lock 9.74 ** Row Source Not Available ** 9.74
SELECT "DT"."SID_0CALMONTH" AS "S____048" ,"D3"."SID_0MATERIAL" AS "S____006" ,
"DU"."SID_0UNIT" AS "S____023" ,"DT"."SID_0CALDAY" AS "S____021" ,"D2"."SID_0MET
YPE" AS "S____1342" ,"D2"."SID_0VTYPE" AS "S____504" ,"X33"."S__Z99GRMAT" AS "S_
___4443" , SUM ( "F"."QUANTITY" ) AS "Z____1299" , COUNT( * ) AS "Z____016"
cursor: pin S wait on X 4.14 ** Row Source Not Available ** 4.14
CPU + Wait for CPU 1.61 SELECT STATEMENT 1.58
48unmtd983uz6 3511339786 0 14.98
library cache lock 11.50 ** Row Source Not Available ** 11.50
SELECT "DT"."SID_0CALDAY" AS "S____021" ,"DT"."SID_0CALMONTH" AS "S____048" ,"D
3"."SID_0MATERIAL" AS "S____006" ,"DU"."SID_0UNIT" AS "S____023" ,"D2"."SID_0MET
YPE" AS "S____1342" ,"D2"."SID_0VTYPE" AS "S____504" , SUM ( "F"."QUANTITY" )
AS "Z____1299" , COUNT( * ) AS "Z____016" FROM "/BIC/FZ99IC114" "F" JOIN "/BIC
cursor: pin S wait on X 1.97 ** Row Source Not Available ** 1.97
CPU + Wait for CPU 1.51 SELECT STATEMENT 1.42
07tcvyb6frtkx 2929764020 1 1.87
gc cr grant 2-way 0.80 TABLE ACCESS - BY USER ROWID 0.75
SELECT "D3"."SID_0SHIP_TO" AS "SID" FROM "/BIC/FZ99IC035" "F" JOIN "/BIC/DZ99IC
0352" "D2" ON "F" . "KEY_Z99IC0352" = "D2" . "DIMID" JOIN "/BI0/XMATERIAL" "X9"
ON "D2" . "SID_0MATERIAL" = "X9" . "SID" JOIN "/BIC/DZ99IC0355" "D5" ON "F" .
"KEY_Z99IC0355" = "D5" . "DIMID" JOIN "/BIC/DZ99IC0353" "D3" ON "F" . "KEY_Z99
Top SQL with Top Events DB/Inst: dbp/dbp1 (Feb 08 09:30 to 10:20)
Sampled #
SQL ID Planhash of Executions % Activity
Event % Event Top Row Source % RwSrc
Top SQL with Top Row Sources DB/Inst: dbp/dbp1 (Feb 08 09:30 to 10:20)
Sampled #
SQL ID PlanHash of Executions % Activity
Row Source % RwSrc Top Event % Event
350v06jcnd822 N/A 0 18.03
** Row Source Not Available ** 18.03 library cache lock 9.41
SELECT "DT"."SID_0CALMONTH" AS "S____048" ,"D3"."SID_0MATERIAL" AS "S____006" ,
"DU"."SID_0UNIT" AS "S____023" ,"DT"."SID_0CALDAY" AS "S____021" ,"D2"."SID_0MET
YPE" AS "S____1342" ,"D2"."SID_0VTYPE" AS "S____504" ,"X33"."S__Z99GRMAT" AS "S_
___4443" , SUM ( "F"."QUANTITY" ) AS "Z____1299" , COUNT( * ) AS "Z____016"
48unmtd983uz6 N/A 0 16.75
** Row Source Not Available ** 16.75 library cache lock 12.87
SELECT "DT"."SID_0CALDAY" AS "S____021" ,"DT"."SID_0CALMONTH" AS "S____048" ,"D
3"."SID_0MATERIAL" AS "S____006" ,"DU"."SID_0UNIT" AS "S____023" ,"D2"."SID_0MET
YPE" AS "S____1342" ,"D2"."SID_0VTYPE" AS "S____504" , SUM ( "F"."QUANTITY" )
AS "Z____1299" , COUNT( * ) AS "Z____016" FROM "/BIC/FZ99IC114" "F" JOIN "/BIC
350v06jcnd822 2426825131 0 15.49
** Row Source Not Available ** 13.91 library cache lock 9.74
SELECT "DT"."SID_0CALMONTH" AS "S____048" ,"D3"."SID_0MATERIAL" AS "S____006" ,
"DU"."SID_0UNIT" AS "S____023" ,"DT"."SID_0CALDAY" AS "S____021" ,"D2"."SID_0MET
YPE" AS "S____1342" ,"D2"."SID_0VTYPE" AS "S____504" ,"X33"."S__Z99GRMAT" AS "S_
___4443" , SUM ( "F"."QUANTITY" ) AS "Z____1299" , COUNT( * ) AS "Z____016"
SELECT STATEMENT 1.58 CPU + Wait for CPU 1.58
48unmtd983uz6 3511339786 0 14.98
** Row Source Not Available ** 13.56 library cache lock 11.50
SELECT "DT"."SID_0CALDAY" AS "S____021" ,"DT"."SID_0CALMONTH" AS "S____048" ,"D
3"."SID_0MATERIAL" AS "S____006" ,"DU"."SID_0UNIT" AS "S____023" ,"D2"."SID_0MET
YPE" AS "S____1342" ,"D2"."SID_0VTYPE" AS "S____504" , SUM ( "F"."QUANTITY" )
AS "Z____1299" , COUNT( * ) AS "Z____016" FROM "/BIC/FZ99IC114" "F" JOIN "/BIC
SELECT STATEMENT 1.42 CPU + Wait for CPU 1.42
07tcvyb6frtkx 2929764020 1 1.87
TABLE ACCESS - BY USER ROWID 1.59 gc cr grant 2-way 0.75
SELECT "D3"."SID_0SHIP_TO" AS "SID" FROM "/BIC/FZ99IC035" "F" JOIN "/BIC/DZ99IC
0352" "D2" ON "F" . "KEY_Z99IC0352" = "D2" . "DIMID" JOIN "/BI0/XMATERIAL" "X9"
ON "D2" . "SID_0MATERIAL" = "X9" . "SID" JOIN "/BIC/DZ99IC0355" "D5" ON "F" .
"KEY_Z99IC0355" = "D5" . "DIMID" JOIN "/BIC/DZ99IC0353" "D3" ON "F" . "KEY_Z99
Top SQL using literals DB/Inst: dbp/dbp1 (Feb 08 09:30 to 10:20)
-> FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE is used to identify SQL statements that are
identical except for their use of literals.
-> Please refer to the Oracle Database Reference to understand how
the FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE is derived.
# of Sampled
FORCE_MATCHING_SIGNATURE % Activity SQL Versions
Example SQL 1
Example SQL 2
1021017294885722791 2.89 218
0htvt0stu1vtq
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "/BIC/FZ99IC003" WHERE "KEY_Z99IC003P" = :A0
0htvt0stu1vtq
Top Parsing Module/Action DB/Inst: dbp/dbp1 (Feb 08 09:30 to 10:20)
Module Action % Activ Event
CL_SQL_STATEMENT============== 383 67.25 library
383 cursor:
383 CPU + Wa
Top Sessions running PQs DB/Inst: dbp/dbp1 (Feb 08 09:30 to 10:20)
-> This section aggregates all the work done by the PQ slaves into
the session issuing the parallel query.
Sid,Srl# (Inst) % Activity SQL ID Event % Event
User Program
1506, 19(1) 33.57 350v06jcnd822 library cache lock 19.15
UserID:
SELECT "DT"."SID_0CALMONTH" AS "S____048" ,"D3"."SID_0MATERIAL" AS "S____006" ,
"DU"."SID_0UNIT" AS "S____023" ,"DT"."SID_0CALDAY" AS "S____021" ,"D2"."SID_0MET
YPE" AS "S____1342" ,"D2"."SID_0VTYPE" AS "S____504" ,"X33"."S__Z99GRMAT" AS "S_
___4443" , SUM ( "F"."QUANTITY" ) AS "Z____1299" , COUNT( * ) AS "Z____016"
cursor: pin S wait on X 12.76
SELECT "DT"."SID_0CALMONTH" AS "S____048" ,"D3"."SID_0MATERIAL" AS "S____006" ,
"DU"."SID_0UNIT" AS "S____023" ,"DT"."SID_0CALDAY" AS "S____021" ,"D2"."SID_0MET
YPE" AS "S____1342" ,"D2"."SID_0VTYPE" AS "S____504" ,"X33"."S__Z99GRMAT" AS "S_
___4443" , SUM ( "F"."QUANTITY" ) AS "Z____1299" , COUNT( * ) AS "Z____016"
CPU + Wait for CPU 1.61
SELECT "DT"."SID_0CALMONTH" AS "S____048" ,"D3"."SID_0MATERIAL" AS "S____006" ,
"DU"."SID_0UNIT" AS "S____023" ,"DT"."SID_0CALDAY" AS "S____021" ,"D2"."SID_0MET
YPE" AS "S____1342" ,"D2"."SID_0VTYPE" AS "S____504" ,"X33"."S__Z99GRMAT" AS "S_
___4443" , SUM ( "F"."QUANTITY" ) AS "Z____1299" , COUNT( * ) AS "Z____016"
2255, 1067(1) 31.78 48unmtd983uz6 library cache lock 24.37
UserID:
SELECT "DT"."SID_0CALDAY" AS "S____021" ,"DT"."SID_0CALMONTH" AS "S____048" ,"D
3"."SID_0MATERIAL" AS "S____006" ,"DU"."SID_0UNIT" AS "S____023" ,"D2"."SID_0MET
YPE" AS "S____1342" ,"D2"."SID_0VTYPE" AS "S____504" , SUM ( "F"."QUANTITY" )
AS "Z____1299" , COUNT( * ) AS "Z____016" FROM "/BIC/FZ99IC114" "F" JOIN "/BIC
cursor: pin S wait on X 5.85
SELECT "DT"."SID_0CALDAY" AS "S____021" ,"DT"."SID_0CALMONTH" AS "S____048" ,"D
3"."SID_0MATERIAL" AS "S____006" ,"DU"."SID_0UNIT" AS "S____023" ,"D2"."SID_0MET
YPE" AS "S____1342" ,"D2"."SID_0VTYPE" AS "S____504" , SUM ( "F"."QUANTITY" )
AS "Z____1299" , COUNT( * ) AS "Z____016" FROM "/BIC/FZ99IC114" "F" JOIN "/BIC
CPU + Wait for CPU 1.51
SELECT "DT"."SID_0CALDAY" AS "S____021" ,"DT"."SID_0CALMONTH" AS "S____048" ,"D
3"."SID_0MATERIAL" AS "S____006" ,"DU"."SID_0UNIT" AS "S____023" ,"D2"."SID_0MET
YPE" AS "S____1342" ,"D2"."SID_0VTYPE" AS "S____504" , SUM ( "F"."QUANTITY" )
AS "Z____1299" , COUNT( * ) AS "Z____016" FROM "/BIC/FZ99IC114" "F" JOIN "/BIC
Top DB Objects DB/Inst: dbp/dbp1 (Feb 08 09:30 to 10:20)
-> With respect to Application, Cluster, User I/O and buffer busy waits only.
Object ID % Activity Event % Event
Object Name (Type) Tablespace
13661539 2.45 gc buffer busy acquire 0.87
SAPSR3./BIC/EZ99IC013 (TABLE) PSAPSR3SSD
Top DB Files DB/Inst: dbp/dbp1 (Feb 08 09:30 to 10:20)
-> With respect to Cluster and User I/O events only.
File ID % Activity Event % Event
File Name Tablespace
53 3.60 gc current block 2-way 0.98
+dbp_DATA/dbp_2/datafile/psapsr3ssd.315.805562113 PSAPSR3SSD
Top Latches DB/Inst: dbp/dbp1 (Feb 08 09:30 to 10:20)
No data exists for this section of the report.
Activity Over Time DB/Inst: dbp/dbp1 (Feb 08 09:30 to 10:20)
-> Analysis period is divided into smaller time slots
-> Top 3 events are reported in each of those slots
-> 'Slot Count' shows the number of ASH samples in that slot
-> 'Event Count' shows the number of ASH samples waiting for
that event in that slot
-> '% Event' is 'Event Count' over all ASH samples in the analysis period
Slot Event
Slot Time (Duration) Count Event Count % Event
09:30:00 (5.0 min) 260 gc buffer busy acquire 43 0.43
reliable message 34 0.34
CPU + Wait for CPU 29 0.29
09:35:00 (5.0 min) 303 CPU + Wait for CPU 76 0.75
db file sequential read 40 0.40
gc buffer busy acquire 39 0.39
09:40:00 (5.0 min) 366 CPU + Wait for CPU 209 2.08
db file sequential read 26 0.26
gc current block 2-way 22 0.22
09:45:00 (5.0 min) 511 CPU + Wait for CPU 249 2.47
cursor: pin S wait on X 93 0.92
reliable message 45 0.45
09:50:00 (5.0 min) 2,245 cursor: pin S wait on X 1,442 14.32
library cache lock 407 4.04
reliable message 112 1.11
09:55:00 (5.0 min) 2,037 library cache lock 1,378 13.69
cursor: pin S wait on X 297 2.95
CPU + Wait for CPU 125 1.24
10:00:00 (5.0 min) 1,823 library cache lock 1,371 13.62
CPU + Wait for CPU 263 2.61
reliable message 72 0.72
10:05:00 (5.0 min) 1,273 library cache lock 866 8.60
CPU + Wait for CPU 155 1.54
reliable message 96 0.95
10:10:00 (5.0 min) 798 library cache lock 350 3.48
CPU + Wait for CPU 287 2.85
reliable message 54 0.54
10:15:00 (5.0 min) 436 CPU + Wait for CPU 200 1.99
reliable message 61 0.61
enq: KO - fast object checkpoi 42 0.42
-------------------------------------------------------------Problems are always on instance 1.
The queries are different each day, the top sql with performance problem changes the sql_id and I cant attack them or apply a sql profile or tune them because they only execute during a period.
Any idea?
:(
Maybe you are looking for
-
All files are converted to Word files in my email program
after siging in to change my pdf files into word files now all my files inserted on e-mails are transformed into word files...how can I change this please ?
-
Can I share iPhoto between 2 users ?
My wife and I each have separate user accounts on our Imac, but we'd like to share the Iphoto library. Since my account was set up first and done so some time ago, all of our family pics are under my user account. Can we share the library so new im
-
Help! My Apple ID for my Itunes/Apps different that ICloud!?
Iphone 6 Here is the issue, I can use the Itunes and Apps Apple ID to log in and purchase Apps on my phone and computer. However, when I go to Icloud and when I try to set up my Passbook, it has and old, inactive email address. I need to somehow rese
-
Trouble Printing Pages Document
I have created a two page, Pages document, I used one of the templates for a news letter. It has text and 15 pictures imported from my photos in iphoto. When I print lower quality draft versions it works fine. But when i want a high quality print, th
-
About proxy communcation in XI
Where we develop inbound proxy and Outbound Proxy ,where proxys will exist? How proxys will be executed? what is the target URL of inbound proxy and Outbound proxy? How data is moved from source system to target system , as we dont,t have any communi