What is the advantages/disadvantages of using BPEL only without BAM?

What is the advantages/disadvantages of using BPEL only without BAM, and the combination for Error and Exception management in SOA?
Please let me know if anybody had this experience?

Hi,
Both variants have pro's and cons. If you plan to use VBA you have to consider the deployment settings on other p.c.'s where you have to allow macro's where as a regular form doesn't have the need for that.
That said the userform gives you much more control because the form command is not saved. it is simply a temporary form which you have to setup every time. It's perfect for data entry. If you are looking for data validation the userform is the one to go
for. You also have the possibility to work on placements of the data entry.
So if you are looking for speed and simplicity then go for the form command. If it is handling control you are after I'd go for a userform.
Just my 2 cts
Maurice
When you see answers and helpful posts, please click Vote As Helpful, Propose As Answer, and/or Mark As Answer. Thank You

Similar Messages

What are the advantages/disadvantages of using PS/CS5 in 64bit over 32bit please?

What are the advantages/disadvantages of using PS/CS5 in 64bit over 32bit please?

From a practical perspective, besides the 64 bit version being a bit faster at just about everything, limitations on document size are lifted in the 64 bit version. Essentially, how much can do is limited only by how much RAM you have installed in your system. You can do things like have larger documents, deeper history, etc. and have it all work quickly.
On the other hand, many 3rd party plug-ins, especially older ones, only provide 32 bit versions, which will only run in 32 bit Photoshop.
Both 32 and 64 bit versions are installed by default. It's important to note that most of the preferences are separate between the two, so you can have two slightly different setups that might help with specialty operations you might need. This gets pretty subtle, but for example I keep the 32 bit version configured with only 1 cache level, so all previews of high bit depth images are always composited in high bit depth. This aids me with some aspects of astroimage processing. It's slower, but more accurate. By contrast I have more cache levels configured for my 64 bit version, so that's faster for general photography work.
-Noel

What are the advantages/disadvantages of using the Form Command over Creating a User Form in VBA?

I’m in the early stages of creating a spreadsheet that will require data entry into the worksheet. The worksheet could get to 1000s of rows, depending on the particular user.
When I refer to the ‘Form Command’ I’m referring to the option of adding a Quick Access Tool bar button by selecting ‘more commands’, ‘all commands’, ‘Form…’
My questions/concerns would be relating to ‘should I develop this spreadsheet with the Form Command or a User Form in VBA?
Concerns/Questions:
Deployment to other users
Protecting worksheet cells so the user can only add records using the form command or the user form in vba. In other words, don’t allow users to edit cells that are not within the table structure of the sheet or add rows if they’re not using the form
Data validation when entering data…
Keith
Keith Aul

Hi,
Both variants have pro's and cons. If you plan to use VBA you have to consider the deployment settings on other p.c.'s where you have to allow macro's where as a regular form doesn't have the need for that.
That said the userform gives you much more control because the form command is not saved. it is simply a temporary form which you have to setup every time. It's perfect for data entry. If you are looking for data validation the userform is the one to go
for. You also have the possibility to work on placements of the data entry.
So if you are looking for speed and simplicity then go for the form command. If it is handling control you are after I'd go for a userform.
Just my 2 cts
Maurice
When you see answers and helpful posts, please click Vote As Helpful, Propose As Answer, and/or Mark As Answer. Thank You

What are some of the advantages/disadvantage of using FC or FCoE with a storage array (EMC)? What is Cisco's recommendation and why?

What are some of the advantages/disadvantages of using FC or FCoE for a storage array? What does Cisco recommend?

This is what I'm considering:
Power:
1050W Seasonic 80PLUS Gold Power Supply
Motherboard:
ASUS, Rampage IV Extreme, 2011, SATA6, True Quad SLI/XFIRE, Extreme OC Capable
CPU:
Intel Core i7-4960X 3.60GHz, 2133MHz DDR3, 15MB Cache, Hex Core Processor
System Memory:
16GB (4 x 4GB) , PC3-19200, 2400MHz (G.Skill - x79)
Video Adapter 1:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780ti 3GB GDDR5
Video Adapter 2:
None
Optical 1
16X Blu-ray Burner - 16xBD-R, 2xBD-RW/16xDVD-R, 8xDVD-RW/48xCD-R, 24xCD-RW
Bay Accessories 1
NZXT Aperture M Multi-media Hub
RAID [Requires Identical Hard Drive Selections]
RAID 0 | 2 Disk Min. Striped set, improved performance, additional storage drive highly recommended
Hard Drive 1
Crucial M550 1TB 2.5" SATA III 6GB/sec Solid State Drive
Hard Drive 2
Crucial M550 1TB 2.5" SATA III 6GB/sec Solid State Drive
Hard Drive 3
Crucial M550 1TB 2.5" SATA III 6GB/sec Solid State Drive
Sound Card
Creative Labs Sound Blaster Z PCI Express

Converting RAW to DNG! What are the advantages / disadvantages?

I have Canon cameras and shoot RAW, but the question itself is surely also valid for Nikon, Sony or other brand-shooters.
When importing my pictures to Lightroom, I could convert them to DNG but didn't do this up to now, because I do not know what I loose. I suppose that I loose the ability to process my files with DPP, but I will not do that anyhow. I can appreciate the advantage of having the file in an open documented format, where even I could easily write a reader for it. So the answer should not be what I can easily find in the Adobe introduction into DNG. I have also the DNG specification in front of me, and I can read it, because I once wrote a program to read TIFF files. I understand that I could add the original RAW image stream, but I do not want using up the space wasted for this. I know, that all development parameters used for the specific RAW image can be written with the image file instead of having those stored in a database or a side-car-file.
But what I did not find until now a technical explanation about what happens during the convert. Who can enlighten me? Where do I find the missing technical explanations?
Thanks in advance!
Lucien.

Feierwoon wrote:
That wasn't the question... .
Based on the title of the thread and your initial post, it seems like your question had a lot of
"What are the advantages / disadvantages?"
in it, and only a little
"What happens at a technical level when converting"
But if you want more detailed info about conversion, and you have the aptitude to understand, I recommend doing what Lr5user-pt recommended:
Download the DNG SDK and dig in - all your questions will be answered (and if not, you can also ask DNG-specific technical questions in the DNG forum).
As far as my "sources" regarding the technical summary I presented, they are many and varied, none of which are the DNG SDK. In other words, my knowledge is based more on experience over the years - I don't know all the details under the hood..
Some experiments to consider doing:
* exiftool (-X) a proprietary raw file, then convert to DNG and repeat.
* open a proprietary raw in a DNG-supporting software of your choice and inspect metadata, then open the converted DNG in the same software and re-evaluate. Compare to proprietary raw opened in manufacturer's software, and what you see via exiftool.
Tom Hogarty (Lightroom project manager) and others who know have said: "DNG converter discards no metadata", and I believe them, but haven't verified for myself. Yet once proprietary metadata is in the DNG, most (all?) software will no longer decode it. A prime example is focus points - presumably they're there, but once converted, focus point feature is no longer supported. The amount of work required to support converted focus point data is unknown (to me), but as far as I know, no software has ventured to do it. If you want focus points, don't convert.
If you want the truth, I think for most people it's "not wise" to convert to DNG. Why? because unless you already know why you are converting (and need to convert to satisfy your goals), or you already know why you must NOT convert (e.g. so you can open the files in mfr.software, and see focus points..) the pros and cons are likely to be a wash, and now you have twice the number of raw files, unless you discard your originals, which would be REALLY "not wise", in my opinion. If you find the notion of "openly documented format" sufficiently compelling, then, ya know, more power to ya (I don't judge..), but there is no guarantee that DNG will outlast NEF (or..), and if it does, there will be ample opportunity to convert before you're left in the cold, unless you're stuck in a cave for a few decades, or are kryogenically frozen.. True, if all companies die, you may be able to write your own DNG converter (/reader), given the DNG documentation, but FWIW, NEF is also thoroughly documented (document is in freely downloadable SDK), and reverse engineerable (that's what Adobe and Phil Harvey does), so you could also write your own NEF converter, so not really a very compelling argument, not this year anyway - ask me again in a few decades..
If filesize is a main draw, then be sure NOT to save the hi-rez previews in your DNGs, otherwise you've just lost most or all of the filesize advantage. Also, you can strip previews from some proprietary raws (e.g. NEFs), to reduce filesize.
Personally, if DNG supported sidecars, I would be more likely to convert, because file-management/backup is only an issue if you "forget" about xmp sidecars (and I do not forget), and I'd rather have my xmp in separate ready-to-read xml text files, rather than embedded in binary files, but hey, that's me..
PS - I always use/encourage-others-to-use DNG when distributing raws to others for use in Adobe software, so xmp is not separate and can not get lost.
PPS - proprietary raws and dngs are both just glorified tiff files - raw data, previews, and metadata..
Don't get me wrong: I am NOT anti-DNG, and in fact - just the opposite: I am PRO dng, it's just that I wouldn't (don't) convert my own raws to DNG at this point. If you find the reasons to convert now are sufficiently compelling, you have my complete support and cooperation, fwiw..
Cheers,
Rob

What are the Advantages & Disadvantages in Material Ledger?

Hi Experts,
What are the Advantages & Disadvantages in Material Ledger?
Is it there any problem if you run CKMLCP next period 10th day?
What is the criticality in ML as well as why all are very fearful to implement it?
Thanks
Bhagirath

Hi,
One cannot speak of 'disadvantage' in this case... If you activate material ledger, you acieve different valuation logic of the prices in the procurement process. Please, consult composite note 532932 for further info. The intimidation of activation is a result of numerous 'bugs' in previous SAP releases regarding the material ledger documents. Most of these 'bugs' are fixed, but the fear remains
Regards,
Eli

What are the Advantages & Disadvantages of Global Variable at Package Level

Dear Expprts
Please tell me,
What is mean by Global Variable?
What are the Advantages and Disadvantages of Global Variable at Package Level against Private Variable?

HI
GLOBAL VARIABLE UR USE ANY BLOCK IN PLSQL
BUT LOCAL VARIABLE USED ONLY THERE THEY DECLARE.
REGARDS
MOHAMMADI

What are the advantages of me using flash?

I want to know the advantages of me using flash for my website. Please tell me all of them. In my opinion, flash loads slowly and is very ineffective but I want to know what you all think of it.

Show your website or describe its use cases (target platform, moble/desktop, features, databaseusage), what kind of developer skills are you bringing to the table (beginner, intermediate, experienced) then we can give you advice if Flash fits the requirements profile.

What's the advantages / Disadvantages of booting from an external HD?

I have an iMac which I want to boot from an external HD (1TB Western Digital) and I wanted to know the advantages and disadvantages of doing this.
If it's an Intel dual processor, can I use either a USB drive or a Firewire drive to do this?
Thanks for all and any input as well.

You can use Firewire, which would be faster than USB. If the external supports it, FW 800 will be pretty fast. Advantage would be you conserve the internal and place wear on the external, which is then no problem to replace if it dies. Disadvantage might be that moving large files would be somewhat slower. If you do this, I'd keep making backups from the external to the internal using a cloning program like Carbon Copy Cloner or SuperDuper. You might need a much larger second external for Time Machine, if you want to use that.
You should also know that many, if not most, WD externals won't boot a Mac and they have a very flaky reputation with Macs in general. I'd get a different drive period. They are mostly bad news. Unreliable.
http://www.bombich.com/

What is the best product for using itunes only?

I am considering buying a laptop / notebook / ipad or whatever for using itunes only. The goal would be to add all cd's to the product and then increase my collection via downloads only going forward.
Can anyone recommend the best product for this please? I have an ipod nano and I'm new to the iphone, so I'm an Apple convert, although I'd consider a non-Apple product too (sorry Apple!).
Budget is tight!
Thanks in advance
Rufus73

Without a bit more info, it's hard to answer your question.
How many CD's do you intend to keep on the PC/Mac/iPad as an iPad has a maximum storage of aprox 55Gb's for the top model, whereas even a basic PC laptop is likely to have 150Gb plus of space. Plus you are going to need a PC/Mac to copy the CD's in the first place, unless you intend to buy all your music from the iTunes store.
For me I would look at either a MacBook if you can go to the £1000 price bracket, or look at a MacMini and cheap screen then transfer the music to your iPod/iPhone or sadly from a price point of view you may have to go the Windows route as a basic laptop will start at £400
Mike

What are the advantages/disadvantages to "Save Media Cache files next to originals when possible?

I just noticed that I have over 7,000 files and 46.7 GB in my Media Cache Files folder. I know I can just delete all the files in this folder and Premiere will automatically rebuild the files when needed. But, are there any advantages or disadvantages to saving the files next to the originals? I assume that means that it will write these files wherever I'm storing my media files...

I'd say storing your cache with your media would decrease your performance. Having them on separate volumes/drives means that Premiere can read/write from them at the same time, instead of having to read/write one or the other, one at a time.
Additionally, PPro is create cache files from your original media, and it's always best practice to read from one drive, while writing to another.
TL;DR It's for Performance. ! ! ! !

What are the advantages / disadvantages of partitioning?

I was wondering if there were any advantages to partitioning the hard drive. Seems this choice needs to be made when you first setup your Mac, and as mine is on its way the time to ask is now.
Has anyone partitioned their drive? Why? Why not?

James,
The greatest advantage to having a secondary volume is that this will allow you to store much of your data on that secondary. For example, my iPhoto and iTunes libraries (by far the largest disk-eating portions of my data) are both stored on my secondary volume.
This helps me manage the size of my HOME folder, and thus makes the maintainance of a comprehensive backup very much easier for me. In the event that I must format my startup disk and reinstall OS X, I will have less to worry about. You see, a secondary volume is much less likely to suffer from a crippling disk error than is a boot volume, and one volume can be formatted independently, without affecting the other.
In addition to providing the constant protection for certain portions of my data, as outlined above, the secondary volume can be used to make or keep a backup of the rest of my HOME folder. I normally use an external drive to handle this, but that secondary volume can be used in a pinch. It's just one extra layer of protection.
The only limitation to this scheme is that it doesn't provide any protection at all from a hardware failure of the drive, itself; it only helps reduce the pain of a file system catalogue failure on the boot volume.
Scott

What are the advantages/disadvantages of crypt vs. SHA for password encryption?

Both crypt and SHA are one-way hashing algorithms.
The crypt algorithm is provided for compatibility with Unix passwords. It accepts the first 8 characters of a password and the output is always 13 characters long and includes only the characters A-Z, a-z, 0-9, ., and /. It is generally weak and can be broken.
SHA provides a 160 bit hash, is more secure, and is recommended by iPlanet.
Regards,
Craig

So what are the advantages with Intel?

What are the advantages/disadvantages with these new Intel processors? Sheesh, I just bought a new laptop and now its outdated lol. Looks like I will try to seel this sucker, and buy the new ones when everything seems to stop updating at Apple...

Basic Advantages... Faster speeds, lower heat. This makes any portable computer very happy.
Basic Disadvantages... software compatibility problems? Native PowerPC applications now run in a sort of emulation mode. Users may need to migrate to software which runs natively on Intel Macs, or has Universal Binaries available. Could be an additional cost to the user.
and buy the new ones when everything seems to stop updating at Apple...
Stops updating?! If you wait for that, you'll never make a purchase. Technology changes very quickly, and it's nearly impossible to have the latest model for any decent length of time before it is updated.
Keep in mind... when machines get updated, that does NOT mean the previous model is obsolete.
I'm sure your current computer is still just as good as the day you bought it. No one is forcing you to upgrade.
If your machine still suits your needs, then stay with it. I'm sure I'll get another 2-3 years of solid happy use from my G4 Powerbook.

What are the advantages to using BlazeDS or Granite?

We have decided to use Flex3 to upgrade our UI. We have heard
good things about using Granite Data Services, but it requires jdk5
or higher, and the same for BlazeDS.
We are currently using Websphere 6.0 and are discussing our
environment options: replace Websphere with JBoss 4.2 (Sun jdk6),
upgrade to Websphere 6.1 (IBM jdk5), or keep the current Websphere
6.0 (IBM jdk4). The concerns are upgrade cost, and time to develop
and qa any changes to the environment.
We would like to get some feedback on pros and cons of using
Flex with these three environments. If we stay with jdk4, will we
spend nn% more time writing code that could have been done out of
the box with Granite? Are there improvements with memory, speed,
etc. using Flex with a later version of the jdk? Will development
time be shorter with a later version of the jdk? What are the
advantages and disadvantages of using Flex with WebSphere versus
JBoss?
Thanks for your input!

BBM and PIN messages are messages sent from one BlackBerry to another. The message is composed by the sender and goes through RIM's secure server before being delivered to the recipient. They are only available to BlackBerry users.
The thing I like about them is how you can see if they've been received by the recipient. Once the message reaches the recipient's phone, you'll notice a small 'D' at the start of your message. This means it's been delivered. When the recipient opens the message, that 'D' will switch to an 'R', for 'read'. So now you know that it's actually been received by the recipient.
One more great thing about these messages is that there is no limit to length. As you're probably aware, most carriers limit text messages to 160 characters; not so with these messages, they can be much longer.
BBM and PIN messages are the same type of message, but with PIN messages you're limited to just that one contact receiving it. With BBM, you can have many contacts in on a chat or you can broadcast a message to many contacts at once.
I hope that explains things for you.
- If my response has helped you, please click "Options" beside my post and mark it as solved. Clicking the "thumbs up" icon near the bottom of my response would also be appreciated.

What is the advantages/disadvantages of using BPEL only without BAM?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for