What is the most efficient way to use Remove Grain from After Effects on large Premiere Pro project?

I've tried to use Dynamic Linking both ways but it doesn't the effects don't appear no matter how dramatic I make them. Why couldn't there just be Remove Grain in Premiere Pro so I wouldn't have to go through the headache of figuring this out. I've tried importing the Premiere Pro project into After effects where everything comes up and, since there's so many files, it doesn't seam feasibly or convenient at all. Trying Dynamic Link vice versa didn't lend results either. What can I do??? Projects range from about a half hour to an hour and a half. Thank you.

The situations are well lit; it might be lack of knowledge on the camera settings itself.
Sort that and your workflow issue dissapears instantly.
There's nothing more efficient?
Yep...read above... but ...any Plugin. eg Neat Video... will take long processing time.
Fixing grain..actually "noise"...is always an image degrading process as well. It blurs!

Similar Messages

What's the most efficient way to serve a file from a servlet?

I have a servlet that does various different things depending on the needs. Sometimes it dynamically generates content, and sometimes all it does is send a file out, with no alteration.
What is the most efficient way to just send a file?
One option:
OutputStream os = response.getOutputStream();
InputStream is = new FileInputStream(...)
(send all the bytes from is to os, the regular way using a buffer)Another option is to say:
RequestDispatcher rd = response.getRequestDispatcher(fileName);
rd.forward();Any other options? What's the prefered way of doing this?
I know the rule of "don't optimize too early" but this is a situation where we need to get the maximum amount of files served with the hardware we have, and it's going to be a lot of static files, so efficiency is important.
Thanks

Ok, that's what I thought. It would be nice if there were a "response.sendStream(InputStream input)" method in the ServletResponse class. Even nicer would be a sendFile or sendChannel or something. This is probably a common usage and it's a place where the container has many opportunities for optimization. For example, it could call the operating systems send_file kernel call so the entire transfer would be done directly from the disk controller to the ether card (on systems that support that).
For now I'll just do my own buffered copy.

What is the most efficient way to use my 2006ish iMac as a second screen for my MacBook pro?

Hello.
My line of work really requires the use of two screens, and I have a macbook pro from 2010 and a white iMac from 2006, I believe. My editing software lives on my laptop, so I'd like to use my iMac as the second display. I can't seem to find any male mini dvi to male mini displayport cables online, so I have a feeling they don't exist. Should I just get a mini dvi (male) to dvi (female) for the iMac and a (male) dvi to (male) mini displayport for the laptop? Is this going to cause latency if I'm running videos? Help please!

Your iMac (from 2006) does not support Target Display Mode, that functionality only became available in Late 2009 with MiniDisplay Port. Even if you were to find a male-to-male cable the iMac isn't going to accept the video from the MacBook Pro in a method you're hoping to achieve (extended desktop mode). I've use ScreenRecycler and the lag is barely noticeable, I think even calling it "lag" is overkill.
If you need a second monitor for work that is apparently an important accessory, why are they not supplying with a second monitor? Even if you were to find a valid connection solution, it's response time would still be slower than a direct link from the MacBook Pro.

What is the most efficient way to convert a static site to a responsive site using Dreamweaver?

I need to convert an old site made in Dreamweaver to be responsive to any monitor size. What is the most efficient way to do this?

Depending on what you have to work with and how it was coded, it might be doable and then again not. Suffice it to say, there are no magic buttons that will do this for you. Also consider that mobile & tablet users interact differently with their web devices. So your navigation & forms must be finger friendly. Also images & content must make mobile users happy without killing their dataplans. There's a lot of planning that goes into making a good Responsive Web site.
Nancy O.

What is the most efficient way to have full access to the front panel on RT Labview?

I have a RT machine that needs to do its job and also port the front panel to an external machine over the network. What is the most efficient way to do it? Using as little of the RT time as possible but providing full functionality to the RT front panel.
So far I have been using it directly from Labview - running the VI on a remote (RT) and have the front panel on local Labview (WINDOWS). I know I can do it with also through WWW (not very happy with that though).
LV2009 SP1.
Thanks

Running a compiled executable on the RT target, rather than running it within the development environment, is probably slightly more efficient but limits you to the web interface. If you're running within the LabVIEW environment, I doubt there's a noticeable difference in efficiency from the RT perspective between the web server and the LabVIEW front panel, although that's mostly a guess (I would expect the RT system to send identical data in each case, once the front panel is loaded). Those are your only options in modern LabVIEW versions. In LabVIEW 7.1 you could build an executable that acted as the front panel for an RT system, but that feature does not exist in recent versions. However, a quick search turned up this document with code to approximately duplicate that behavior, perhaps it will work for you?

What's the most efficient way to transfer to personal domain?

I've been using the cumbersome .Mac address and have spent a lot of time optimizing the site, having also purchased a domain name (which I'll switch to), which is currently masked and forwarded. So what's the most smooth way of using the personal domain without losing all the strides I've made to get bumped up in the rankings? Thanks in advance for your suggestions. www.RedCottageInc.com (that's my future personal domain!)

I'm saying that you give Google the .Mac URL to get to your sitemap but use the registered domain name for normal access.
You are promoting your site with www.RedCottageInc.com but, because it is masked, Google needs your web.mac address to access the verification file and the sitemap so that it can spider your site.
You normally upload your sitemap as "sitemap.xml". You can test its accessibility by entering
http://web.mac.com/username/WebSiteName/Sitemap.xml in your browser.
Google needs this URL to get to the sitemap - visitors will use www.RedCottageInc.com.
Google wants to get to the verification file and the sitemap but your website visitors don't.
I guess all this is confusing if you haven't done it before and I don't know that I am explaining it very well. The best way to get it is to go through all the steps of creating the verification file and sitemap, uploading them to your site folder and adding and verifying in your Google control panel.
Here are the relevant Google pages...
Guidelines...
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769
Add URL to Google...
http://www.google.com/addurl/?continue=/addurl
Verification file....
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35658&query=html+f ile&topic=&type=
Sitemap...
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=34657&ctx=sibling

I am giving my old MacBook Air to my granddaughter. What is the most efficient way to erase all the data on it?

I am giving my old MacBook Air to my granddaughter. What is the most efficient way to erase the data?

You have two options.....
One is to do a clean reinstall of your OS - if you still have the USB installer that came with your Macbook Air...
The second option is to create a new user (your granddaugher's name).....Deauthorize your Macbook Air from your Itunes and Appstore.....
Restart your Macbook after you've created your granddaughter's user name, login under your granddaughter's username and delete your username.
Search your Macbook for your old files and delete them.....
Good luck...

What is the most efficient way to turn an array of 16 bit unsigned integers into an ASCII string such that...?

What is the most efficient way to turn a one dimensional array of 16 bit unsigned integers into an ASCII string such that the low byte of the integer is first, then the high byte, then two bytes of hex "00" (that is to say, two null characters in a row)?
My method seems somewhat ad hoc. I take the number, split it, then interleave it with 2 arrays of 4095 bytes. Easy enough, but it depends on all of these files being exactly 16380 bytes, which theoretically they should be.
The size of the array is known. However, if it were not, what would be the best method?
(And yes, I am trying to read in a file format from another program)

My method:
Attachments:
word_array_to_weird_string.vi ‏18 KB

What is the most efficient way to post several stories to multiple html pages

What is the most efficient way to post five stories to multiple html pages?
Currently they are all html files saved in DW with some divs sharing content and other divs are unique.
I've experimented with saving stories as library items and dropping into other html but wondered if there is a more efficient or dynamic process.

Server-Side Includes.
http://forums.adobe.com/message/2112460#2112460
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
http://alt-web.com/
http://twitter.com/altweb

Moving content from iMovie to iMovie - what's the most efficient way?

If I edit and create movies in iMovie08 on one iMac and I want to transfer the content to iMovie08 another iMac 200 miles away , what's the most efficient way? I prefer not to burn DVDs, because I want to do further work on the movies on the second iMac's iMovie (so I can share them with iTunes and sync them with Apple TV).

>PDPageAddCosContents(destPage, PDPageGetCosContents(srcPage));
Does this method (PDPageGetCosContent) exist? It would be easy enough
to create, but I don't see it in the document.
More seriously, I have a vague memory that it is a Really Bad Thing to
share the same Contents objects between multiple pages. Maybe
something to do with page deletion, can't remember.
>PDPageAddCosResource(destPage, PDPageGetCosResources(srcPage));
These two methods are not symmetric, and PDPageAddCosResource doesn't
work that way, sadly...
Aandi Inston

Most efficient way to delete "removed" photos from hard disk?

Hello everyone! Glad to have this great community to come to for help. I searched for this question but came up with no hits. If it's already been discussed, I apologize and would love to be directed to the link.
My wife and I have been using LR for a long time. We're currently on version 4. Unfortunately, she's not as tech-savvy or meticulous as I am, and she has been unknowingly "Removing" photos from the LR catalogues when she really meant to delete them from the hard disk. That means we have hundreds of unwanted raw photo files floating around in our computer and no way to pick them out from the ones we want! As a very organized and space-conscious person, I can't stand the thought. So my question is, what is the most efficient way to permanently delete these unwanted photos from the hard disk
I did fine one suggestion that said to synchronize the parent folder with their respective catalogues, select all the photos in "Previous Import," and delete those, since they will be all of the photos that were previously removed from the catalogue.
This is a great suggestion, but it probably wouldn't work for all of my catalogues since my file structure is organized by date (the default setting for LR). So, two catalogues will share the same "parent folder" in the sense that they both have photos from May 2013, but if I synchronize May 2013 with one, then it will get all the duds PLUS the photos that belong in the other catalogue.
Does anyone have any suggestions? I know there's probably not an easy fix, and I'm willing to put in some time. I just want to know if there is a solution and make sure I'm working as efficiently as possible.
Thank you!
Kenneth

I have to agree with the comment about multiple catalogs referring to images that are mixed in together... and the added difficulty that may have brought here.
My suggestions (assuming you are prepared to combine the current catalogs into one)
in each catalog, put a distinctive keyword onto all the images so that you can later discriminate these images as to which particular catalog they were formerly in (just in case this is useful information later)
as John suggests, use File / "Import from Catalog" to bring all LR images together into one catalog.
then in order to separate out the image files that ARE imported to LR, from those which either never were / have been removed, I would duplicate just the imported ones, to an entirely separate and dedicated disk location. This may require the temporary use of an external drive, with enough space for everything.
to do this, highlight all the images in the whole catalog, then use File / "Export as Catalog" selecting the option "include negatives". Provide a filename and location for the catalog inside your chosen new saving location. All the image files that are imported to the catalog will be selectively copied into this same location alongside the new catalog. The same relative arrangement of subfolders will be created there, for them all to live inside, as is seen currently. But image files that do not feature in LR currently, will be left behind by this operation.
your new catalog is now functional, referring to the copied image files. Making sure you have a full backup first, you can start deleting image files from the original location, that you believe to be unwanted. You can do this safe in the knowledge that anything LR is actively relying on, has already been duplicated elsewhere. So you can be quite aggressive at this, only watching out for image files that are required for other purposes (than as master data for Lightroom) - e.g., the exported JPG files you may have made.
IMO it is a good idea to practice a full separation of image files used in your LR image library, from all other image files. This separation means you know where it is safe to manage images freely using the OS, vs where (what I think of as the LR-managed storage area) you need to bear LR's requirements constantly in mind. Better for discrete backup, too.
In due course, as required, the copied image files plus catalog can be moved bodily to another drive (for example, if they have been temporarily put on an external drive, and you want to store them on your main internal one again). This then just requires a single re-browsing of their parent folder's location, in order to correct LR's records inside this catalog, as to the image files' changed addresses.
If you don't want to combine the catalogs into one, a similar set of operations as above, can be carried out for each separate catalog you have now. This will create a separate folder structure in each case, containing just those duplicated image files. Once this has been done for all catalogs, you can start to clean up the present image files location. IMO this is very much the laborious and inflexible option, so far as future management of the total body of images is concerned... though there may still be some overriding reason for working that way.
RP

What is the most efficient way of passing large amounts of data through several subVIs?

I am acquiring data at a rate of once every 30mS. This data is sorted into clusters with relevant information being grouped together. These clusters are then added to a queue. I have a cluster of queue references to keep track of all the queues. I pass this cluster around to the various sub VIs where I dequeue the data. Is this the most efficient way of moving the data around? I could also use "Obtain Queue" and the queue name to create the reference whenever I need it.
Or would it be more efficient to create one large cluster which I pass around? Then I can use unbundle by index to pick off the values I need. This large cluster can have all the values individually or it co
uld be composed of the previously mentioned clusters (ie. a large cluster of clusters).

> I am acquiring data at a rate of once every 30mS. This data is sorted
> into clusters with relevant information being grouped together. These
> clusters are then added to a queue. I have a cluster of queue
> references to keep track of all the queues. I pass this cluster
> around to the various sub VIs where I dequeue the data. Is this the
> most efficient way of moving the data around? I could also use
> "Obtain Queue" and the queue name to create the reference whenever I
> need it.
> Or would it be more efficient to create one large cluster which I pass
> around? Then I can use unbundle by index to pick off the values I
> need. This large cluster can have all the values individually or it
> could be composed of the previously mentioned clusters (i
e. a large
> cluster of clusters).
It sounds pretty good the way you have it. In general, you want to sort
these into groups that make sense to you. Then if there is a
performance problem, you can arrange them so that it is a bit better for
the computer, but lets face it, our performance counts too. Anyway,
this generally means a smallish number of groups with a reasonable
number of references or objects in them. If you need to group them into
one to pass somewhere, bundle the clusters together and unbundle them on
the other side to minimize the connectors needed. Since the references
are four bytes, you don't need to worry about the performance of moving
these around anyway.
Greg McKaskle

What is the most efficient way to compare two Lists?

List A{itemId,itemName} [1,xyz] [9,iyk] [4,iuo] .......
List B{itemId,item price} [2,999] [9,888] [1, 444].......
Assume A will be a much larger list than B
I am trying to find all the items with same itemiId. what would be the most efficient way to do that?
Thanks!

Tinkerbell. wrote:
BigDaddyLoveHandles wrote:
You wrote:
Can we assume that an itemId only occurs once in each list? You're the one making claims and assumptions, not me.No in #4 I asked the OP to verify an assumption.An assumption that couldn't possibly be true. Why are you wasting our time?

SQL query with multiple tables - what is the most efficient way?

Hello I am learning PL/SQL. I have a simple procedure where I need to find number of employees and departments per location as per user input of location_id.
I have 3 Tables:
LOCATIONS
location_id (pk)
location_name
DEPARTMENTS
department_id (pk)
location_id (fk)
department_name
EMPLOYEES
employee_id (pk)
department_id (fk)
employee_name
1 Location can have 0-MANY Departments
1 Employee has 1 Department
Here is the query I came up with for PL/SQL procedure:
/*Ecount, Dcount are NUMBER variables */
SELECT SUM (EmployeeCount), COUNT(DepartmentNumber)
     INTO Ecount, Dcount
     FROM
     (SELECT COUNT(employee_id) EmployeeCount, department_id DepartmentNumber
          FROM employees
          GROUP BY department_id
          HAVING department_id IN
                    (SELECT department_id
                    FROM departments
                    WHERE location_id = userInput));
I do get the correct result, but I am just wondering if my query is on the right track and if there is a more "efficient" way of doing this.
Thanks in advance for helping a newbie out.

Hi,
Welcome to the forum!
Something like this will be more efficient:
SELECT    COUNT (employee_id)               AS ECount
,       COUNT (DISTINCT department_id)     AS DCount
FROM       employees
WHERE       department_id IN (     SELECT     department_id
                    FROM      departments
                    WHERE      location_id = :userInput
;You should also try a join instead of the IN subquery.
For efficiency, do only the things you need to do.
For example, you don't need a count of employees in each department, so don't compute one. That means you won't need the in-line view, so don't have one.
You don't need PL/SQL for this job, so don't use PL/SQL if you don't have to. (I realize this question was out of context, so you may have good reasons for doing this in PL/SQL.)
Do all filtering as early as possible. Don't waste effort computing things that won't be used .
A particular example of this is: Never use a HAVING clause when you can use a WHERE clause. What's the difference between a WHERE clause and a HAVING clause? The WHERE clause is applied before aggregate functions are computed, and the HAVING clause is applied after; there's no other difference. Therefore, if the HAVING clause isn't referencing an aggregate function, it could be done in a WHERE clause instead.

WHAT IS THE MOST EFFICIENT WAY OF ORGANISING DOCUMENT FILING ?

I know this sounds dumb, but I am flummoxed about how to organise filing of folders on my Mac. In the real world filing is easy but computers seem to make it completely different & a nightmare.
I have ten years worth of using various macs all copied onto the latest one & now occupying about 230 Gigabytes. There are loads of duplicated files and repeated backups from all those years just sitting around taking up space & making it impossible to find anything.
Obviously I was careless about filing right from the start, not realising what a mess it would get into.
In the real world you can just clean up an untidy mess and make it tidy, organised and easy to find things. But in the real world you dont have an electronic lunatic duplicating everthing all the time. With over a million files to look at & sort it is simply impossible to do what you would do in the real world.
One obvious solution is just to archive it and start again. But this time I would like to know how to stop this happening again and what is the best 'system' or way of organising files to stop it all becoming a total mess again.
What seems to happen is that my good intentions of having about ten folders on my desktop to cover ten areas of activity naturallly degraded as when you have a busy day you collect all sorts of things on the desktop outside of those folders which you want to just leave on the desktop to deal with and complete another day.
This process happens every day and so when you then clean up the desktop you just bung all those files in the basic ten folders. But that just means you transfer the mess from the desktop into the ten basic folders and the same process just gets endlessly repeated all the way down through each hierarchical layer of the folders.
This is obviously a problem everyone has, and some bright spark must have worked out a way of preventing this from happening.
i.e. someone must have worked out the best way of organising a filing system on a Mac.
And part of this problem is illustrated by email which I have no idea how to stop getting bigger & bigger.
The only solution I can think of is to archive my whole desktop on an external disk and start all over again from the begining by setting up a brand new account. But while this would work to start off with, unless I can work out some way of doing things better, it will also eventually become a horrible, cluttered mess.
Has anyone got any ideaas about how to deal with this problem. It must be a problem for everyone really ?

Well, there are two sides to this. The first is obviously the organizing of your files, which is something that you really have to work out your own solution for. I don't know what your ten folders are called, but it seems that that's not working for you as a way to keep things managed on a daily basis. What kind of files are these - documents (eg Word files), photos, something else? Do they all need to be filed in folders? (If they're images, there are better ways to manage them - eg iPhoto). Do they all even need to be kept?
The other side to this is retrieval. We keep things organized so that we can easily retrieve them. However, the advantage of a computer-based system, above a paper filing system, is that you can have multiple ways of getting to information without having to change the way the files are stored. For example, the Finder can store searches as Smart Folders, meanings that you can search documents for "Tax Return" and store the results in a sidebar shortcut. Any documents containing that text (whether in the title or in the document itself, your choice) will automatically be displayed in that "folder" (although you're not moving files, you're simply displaying the result of a search).
Similarly, tags in 10.9 Mavericks are designed to let you add keywords to files (such as "Urgent", "Pet Information", "Household", "Financial", and so on), and documents tagged this way are automatically shown collected in the sidebar.
Email services are moving in the same direction. You *can* spend a period of time every day manually filing email into mailboxes you've created to organize them, but a more efficient method can be to leave them all in one folder (ie, the inbox), tag them appropriately, and then display the tagged results as folders (this is what Gmail does with labels), or search for specific criteria (show me all mail from Bob with attachments, show me all mail that includes the phrase "Project Werewolf".
If you can figure out a smart retrieval system that works for you, I would recommend that over the manual organization which is currently causing you frustrations. Do some basic organizing, sure - you don't want everything in one huge folder - but don't forget there are tools which are there to help you find things quickly.
Matt

What is the most efficient way to use Remove Grain from After Effects on large Premiere Pro project?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for