What motherboard is better for amd64

I have bought amd64 processor(3200).
I do not know which motherboard is better for amd64 cpu.
k8n neo platinum is good choice?

Hello,
If it has not got PCI express, you should not get it.
Wait a bit for the PCI express boards to come out for AMD.
http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=75&type=expert
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=19732
http://www.bit-tech.net/feature/64/
look for VIA K8T890 based motherboards like the ABIT AX8
http://www.abit-usa.com/news/2004/20041018.php

Similar Messages

  • I can't find out what motherboard I have for my HP Pavilion 15t-n200

    Hi
    I have a HP Pavilion 15t-n200 and I can't find out what motherboard I have . I have been searching for answers for days now and have decided to come to the forums.
    The specs are:
    i5-4200u 1.6 GHz - 2.3 Ghz
    8GB DDR3 RAm/Memory
    64-bit Operating System
    Windows 8.1
    If anyone could help me find out what mother boar I have that would be great.
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    Here is the Service Manual:
    Manual
    See Page 20
    You have one of these boards depending on which video chip you have and which version of Windows. The processor is soldered to the board.
    Intel Core i5-4200U 740M 1.6-GHz (2 GB DC BGA 15 W) for use with Windows Standard 736377-501
    Intel Core i5-4200U 740M 1.6-GHz (2 GB DC BGA 15 W) for use with Windows Professional 736377-601
    Intel Core i5-4200U 840M 1.6-GHz (2 GB DC BGA 15 W) for use with Windows Standard 751494-501
    Intel Core i5-4200U 840M 1.6-GHz (2 GB DC BGA 15 W) for use with Windows Professional 751494-601
    Intel Core i5-4200M 840M 1.6-GHz (2 GB DC BGA 15 W) for use with Windows Standard 754312-501
    Intel Core i5-4200U 8670M 1.6-GHz (2 GB DC BGA 15 W) for use with Windows Professional 754312-601
    So look at device manager under Display adapter and do you have regular Windows 8.1 or 8.1 Pro?
    Why do you need to know what model motherboard you have?
    If this is "the Answer" please click "Accept as Solution" to help others find it. 

  • What antivirus is better for those who work with mac and windows?

    In my home I use an iMac, but in college I use Windows, and more than once I found an infected file. I know not affect iMac, but I prefer that viruses are removed. Right now I use ClamXv, but I don't know if it is effective.
    Am I to continue using ClamXv? or, do I use another?
    If there are others better AV for mac, what is most recommended?
    **I have also used Sophos, but it makes the iMac go very slow.
    Thanks for your attention.

    1. This is a comment on what you should and should not do to protect yourself from malicious software ("malware") that circulates on the Internet. It does not apply to software, such as keystroke loggers, that may be installed deliberately by an intruder who has hands-on access to your computer, or who has been able to log in to it remotely. That threat is in a different category, and there's no easy way to defend against it. If you have reason to suspect that you're the target of such an attack, you need expert help.
    If you find this comment too long or too technical, read only sections 5, 6, and 10.
    OS X now implements three layers of built-in protection specifically against malware, not counting runtime protections such as execute disable, sandboxing, system library randomization, and address space layout randomization that may also guard against other kinds of exploits.
    2. All versions of OS X since 10.6.7 have been able to detect known Mac malware in downloaded files, and to block insecure web plugins. This feature is transparent to the user, but internally Apple calls it "XProtect." The malware recognition database is automatically checked for updates once a day; however, you shouldn't rely on it, because the attackers are always at least a day ahead of the defenders.
    The following caveats apply to XProtect:
    It can be bypassed by some third-party networking software, such as BitTorrent clients and Java applets.
    It only applies to software downloaded from the network. Software installed from a CD or other media is not checked.
    As new versions of OS X are released, it's not clear whether Apple will indefinitely continue to maintain the XProtect database of older versions such as 10.6. The security of obsolete system versions may eventually be degraded. Security updates to the code of obsolete systems will stop being released at some point, and that may leave them open to other kinds of attack besides malware.
       3. Starting with OS X 10.7.5, there has been a second layer of built-in malware protection, designated "Gatekeeper" by Apple. By default, applications and Installer packages downloaded from the network will only run if they're digitally signed by a developer with a certificate issued by Apple. Software certified in this way hasn't necessarily been tested by Apple, but you can be reasonably sure that it hasn't been modified by anyone other than the developer. His identity is known to Apple, so he could be held legally responsible if he distributed malware. That may not mean much if the developer lives in a country with a weak legal system (see below.)
    Gatekeeper doesn't depend on a database of known malware. It has, however, the same limitations as XProtect, and in addition the following:
    It can easily be disabled or overridden by the user.
    A malware attacker could get control of a code-signing certificate under false pretenses, or could simply ignore the consequences of distributing codesigned malware.
    An App Store developer could find a way to bypass Apple's oversight, or the oversight could fail due to human error.
    For the reasons given above, App Store products, and other applications recognized by Gatekeeper as signed, are safer than others, but they can't be considered absolutely safe. "Sandboxed" applications may prompt for access to private data, such as your contacts, or for access to the network. Think before granting that access. Sandboxing security is based on user input. Never click through any request for authorization without thinking.
    4. Starting with OS X 10.8.3, a third layer of protection has been added: a "Malware Removal Tool" (MRT). MRT runs automatically in the background when you update the OS. It checks for, and removes, malware that may have evaded the other protections via a Java exploit (see below.) MRT also runs when you install or update the Apple-supplied Java runtime (but not the Oracle runtime.) Like XProtect, MRT is effective against known threats, but not against unknown ones. It notifies you if it finds malware, but otherwise there's no user interface to MRT.
    5. The built-in security features of OS X reduce the risk of malware attack, but they're not absolute protection. The first and best line of defense is always going to be your own intelligence. With the possible exception of Java exploits, all known malware circulating on the Internet that affects a fully-updated installation of OS X 10.6 or later takes the form of so-called "Trojan horses," which can only have an effect if the victim is duped into running them. The threat therefore amounts to a battle of wits between you and Internet criminals. If you're smarter than they think you are, you'll win. That means, in practice, that you always stay within a safe harbor of computing practices. How do you know what is safe?
    Any website that prompts you to install a “codec,” “plug-in,” "player," "downloader," "extractor," or “certificate” that comes from that same site, or an unknown one, is unsafe.
    A web operator who tells you that you have a “virus,” or that anything else is wrong with your computer, or that you have won a prize in a contest you never entered, is trying to commit a crime with you as the victim. (Some reputable websites did legitimately warn visitors who were infected with the "DNSChanger" malware. That exception to this rule no longer applies.)
    Pirated copies or "cracks" of commercial software, no matter where they come from, are unsafe.
    Software of any kind downloaded from a BitTorrent or from a Usenet binary newsgroup is unsafe.
    Software that purports to help you do something that's illegal or that infringes copyright, such as saving streamed audio or video for reuse without permission, is unsafe. All YouTube "downloaders," for example, are outside the safe harbor, though not all are malware.
    Software with a corporate brand, such as Adobe Flash Player, must be downloaded directly from the developer’s website. If it comes from any other source, it's unsafe. For instance, if a web page warns you that Flash is out of date, do not follow an offered link to an update. Go to the Adobe website to download it, if you need it at all.
    There is an increasing tendency for rogue websites such as "Softonic" and "CNET Download" to distribute free applications that have been packaged in a superfluous installer that also installs malware or something else that you don't want. Never visit those sites, and get all freeware directly from the developer's own site whenever possible.
    Software attached to email that you didn't request is unsafe, even if it comes (or seems to come) from someone you trust.
    Software advertised by means of spam is unsafe.
    Unknown "free" software that a stranger on the Internet is eager for you to download is unsafe.
    Even signed applications, no matter what the source, should not be trusted if they do something unexpected, such as asking for permission to access your contacts, your location, or the Internet for no obvious reason.
    "FREE WI-FI !!!" networks in public places are unsafe unless you can verify that the network is not a trap (which you probably can't.) Even then, do not download any software or transmit any private information while connected to such a network, regardless of where it seems to come from or go to.
    I don't say that leaving the safe harbor just once will inevitably result in disaster, but making a habit of it will weaken your defenses against malware attack. Doing any of the things alluded to above should make you uncomfortable.
       6. Java on the Web (not to be confused with JavaScript, to which it's not related, despite the similarity of the names) is a weak point in the security of any system. Java is, among other things, a platform for running complex applications in a web page, on the client. That was always a bad idea, and Java's developers have proven themselves incapable of implementing it without also creating a portal for malware to enter. Past Java exploits are the closest thing there has ever been to a Windows-style virus affecting OS X. Merely loading a page with malicious Java content could be harmful.
    Fortunately, client-side Java on the Web is obsolete and mostly extinct. Only a few outmoded sites still use it. Try to hasten the process of extinction by avoiding those sites, if you have a choice. Forget about playing games or other non-essential uses of Java.
    Java is not included in OS X 10.7 and later. Discrete Java installers are distributed by Apple and by Oracle (the developer of Java.) Don't use either one unless you need it. Most people don't. If Java is installed, disable it — not JavaScript — in your browsers.
    Regardless of version, experience has shown that Java on the Web can't be trusted. If you must use a Java applet for a task on a specific site, enable Java only for that site in Safari. Never enable Java for a public website that carries third-party advertising. Use it only on well-known, login-protected, secure websites without ads. In Safari 6 or later, you'll see a lock icon in the address bar with the abbreviation "https" when visiting a secure site.
    Stay within the safe harbor, and you’ll be as safe from malware as you can practically be. The rest of this comment concerns what you should not do to protect yourself.
    7. Never install any commercial "anti-virus" or "Internet security" products for the Mac, as they all do more harm than good, if they do any good at all. If you need to be able to detect Windows malware in your files, use one of the free security apps in the Mac App Store — nothing else.
    Why shouldn't you use commercial "anti-virus" products?
    To recognize malware, the software depends on a database of known threats, which is always at least a day out of date. New threats are emerging on a daily basis. Research has shown that most successful attacks are "zero-day" — that is, previously unknown. Recognition-based malware scanners do not defend against such attacks.
    Their design is predicated on the nonexistent threat that malware may be injected at any time, anywhere in the file system. Malware is downloaded from the network; it doesn't materialize from nowhere.
    In order to meet that nonexistent threat, the software modifies or duplicates low-level functions of the operating system, which is a waste of resources and a common cause of instability, bugs, and poor performance.
    By modifying the operating system, the software itself may create weaknesses that could be exploited by malware attackers.
    8. An anti-malware product from the App Store, such as "ClamXav," has the same drawback as the commercial suites of being always out of date, but it does not inject code into the operating system. That doesn't mean it's entirely harmless. It may report email messages that have "phishing" links in the body, or Windows malware in attachments, as infected files, and offer to delete or move them. Doing so will corrupt the Mail database. The messages should be deleted from within the Mail application.
    An anti-virus app is not needed, and should not be relied upon, for protection against OS X malware. It's useful only for detecting Windows malware, and even for that use it's not completely effective. Windows malware can't harm you directly (unless, of course, you use Windows.) Just don't pass it on to anyone else.
    A Windows malware attachment in email is usually easy to recognize. The file name will often be targeted at people who aren't very bright; for example:
    ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥!!!!!!!H0TBABEZ4U!!!!!!!.AVI♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.exe
    Anti-virus software may be able to tell you which particular trojan it is, but do you really care? In practice, there's seldom a reason to use the software unless an institutional policy requires it. Windows malware is so widespread that you should assume it's in every unknown email attachment until proven otherwise.
    The ClamXav developer won't try to "upsell" you to a paid version of the product. Other developers may do that. Don't be upsold. For one thing, you should not pay to protect Windows users from the consequences of their choice of computing platform. For another, a paid upgrade from a free app will probably have all the disadvantages mentioned in section 7.
    9. It seems to be a common belief that the built-in Application Firewall acts as a barrier to infection, or prevents malware from functioning. It does neither. It blocks inbound connections to certain network services you're running, such as file sharing. It's disabled by default and you should leave it that way if you're behind a router on a private home or office network. Activate it only when you're on an untrusted network, for instance a public Wi-Fi hotspot, where you don't want to provide services. Disable any services you don't use in the Sharing preference pane. All are disabled by default.
    10. As a Mac user you don't have to live in fear that your computer may be infected every time you install software, read email, or visit a web page. But neither should you assume that you will always be safe from exploitation, no matter what you do. The greatest harm done by security software is precisely its selling point: it makes people feel safe. They may then feel safe enough to take risks from which the software doesn't protect them. "Hmmmm, this torrent is a crack of that new game I want. I think I'll download it. It could be a trojan, but the antivirus will warn me if it is." Then they wonder why their Mac is so slow all of a sudden. It's slow because it's running flat out mining bitcoins for a hacker who has already sold their credit card number and banking passwords to a criminal gang. Maybe a week later the antivirus does warn them, but what good does that do?
    Nothing can lessen the need for safe computing practices.

  • What organizer is better for Mac, iPhoto or Elements 12?

    This is somewhat of a re-post because I could not find a way to respond to a reply.
    Right now I have duplicate libraries and want to go to one Library.  I am trying to figure out the best way to go.  It looks like I can get the same kind of organization as in the Elements organizer with iPhoto Smart Albums but I didn't know if I could import PSD files to iPhoto and Barbara B. says that iPhoto does not like PSD files.
    So if I want to be able to save in PSD I need to stay with the Elements Organizer and Editor.
    To make my best decision I want to know what I am loosing in general Macbook utility if I eliminate iPhoto and go with the Elements Organizer.  I have only had my Mac for a few months but I see that iPhoto drops photos in programs like Keynote very easily.  If I stay with the Elements Organizer will I loose some utility or will I be able to drag and drop everything I need to simply?
    I am asking the question because I have space problems with my 9K photos now.  I only want to delete one of these libraries once and want to make the right choice.
    Thank you.

    Well, the right one is the one that works best for you. I'll start by saying that in real life I don't use either one, because I dislike asset management programs, so I have no dog in this fight.
    The advantages of iphoto are that it's much better integrated into OS X, has much nicer options for slideshows and projects,  and is generally a more polished performer than organizer.
    The advantages of organizer are that you can save as many versions as you like, that your photos aren't in a proprietary library (you can just file>open in any program to get at an organizer photo), and it gives you more options for working with raw.
    There are advantages and disadvantages to both. Two other options to consider would be aperture and lightroom, too.
    It's not something that anyone can answer for you. It depends so much on how you like to work.

  • What GPU is better for AE6 - nVidia GTX 775m or nVidia GTX 780m

    Sorry to ask - I can't find anything conclusive for this question and I've been searching for an answer above. I've check this forum (among several others) and have found some answers, but none of them really conclusively answer my question.
    I'm looking to buy an 2013 imac 27inch
    3.5GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost up to 3.9GHz
    8GB 1600MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2X4GB (will upgrade post purchase via crucial)
    512GB Flash Storage
    and I'm primarily going to animate and video edit on the machine - I just don't know if it's really worth spending the extra cash on the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M 4GB GDDR5 or settle for the standard NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M 2GB GDDR5?
    Any help anyone?
    Best Wishes
    James

    The GPU doesn't matter much for After Effects itself. If you're using Photoshop or Premiere Pro or some plug-ins like Element 3D, then GPU matters more for them.
    The more VRAM, the better, though, so I'd personally go with the card with 4GB.
    Details about how After Effects uses the GPU are here:
    http://blogs.adobe.com/aftereffects/2012/05/gpu-cuda-opengl-features-in-after-effects-cs6. html

  • What OSX does suit better for PowerBook G4 17"?

    I have 2 partitions, both as StartUp Disks with Leopard 10.5.8 OSX.
    Can you please tell me what OSX is better for my Mac? Leopard or Tiger?
    I never tried the last, 'cos I bought this laptop a second-hand with Leopard on it already.
    So, I'd like to know more what of the OS is better for Powerbook G4 (concerning productivity, speed,usability etc.)?
    Here's my Hard Ware Overview:
    Hardware Overview:
          Model Name: PowerBook G4 17"
          Model Identifier: PowerBook5,9
          Processor Name: PowerPC G4 (1.5)
          Processor Speed: 1.67 GHz
          Number Of CPUs: 1
          L2 Cache (per CPU): 512 KB
          Memory: 2 GB
          Bus Speed: 167 MHz
          Boot ROM Version: 4.9.5f3
          Serial Number (system): W8******SX0
          Hardware UUID: 00000000-0000-1000-8000-00145122650A
          Sudden Motion Sensor:
              State: Enabled
    I'm asking, 'cos sometimes (especially now) the System really slow! Even writing this text is no really easy task to do!
    Productivity of the laptop harshly decreases! Launching applications, opening windows, writing text, opening tabs in a browser etc.
    <Edited by Host>

    Make sure you use a 10.5.6 retail or older 10.5.4, 10.5.1, or 10.5.0 retail if installing 10.5.
    Note that Mac will not boot into 9, and will lose access to Classic under the Mac OS X 10.5 boot.  For more on updating to 10.5 including the retail disc description, see this tip:
    https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-2275

  • What is the difference between Firefox and Firefox os please. I have a Samsung galaxy s3 mini what one would you recommend would be better for my phone

    What is the difference between Firefox and Firefox os, and what one is better for the Samsung galaxy s3 mini, Please could you recommend which one is the best and most suitable for my phone please. Many thanks Michelle Petch

    Thank you for your question.
    Firefox is basically a browser.And Firefox OS is an Operating System.You can install Firefox in your SGS3 just like an android application.But if you want Firefox operating system on it. then you have to flash the ported Firefox OS on your device. Then it will be a completely different standalone operating system.you cannot install android applications on it.
    To read more technical difference read:
    Firefox OS:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefox_OS
    Firefox Browser:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefox
    Hope this clears your query.Thank you

  • Photoshop on Windows or Mac? What system is better?

    Hi I'm thinking on buying new laptop mostly to create stuff in Photoshop, sometimes After Effects videos and to update my community blog [link removed by moderator]
    My friend is saying that I should buy Mac Book because it will work better and faster etc. even with 8GB of RAM. Is it true? Windows Laptops with 16GB of RAM are much more cheaper than Apple... What will be better for me? Thanks in advance.

    Which Platform is better may change over time.  When Photoshop first started you did not have a choice.  Thomas developed Display for the Mac and demonstrated it to Adobe and Photoshop history began.   That was back around 1990 it was Mac Only I think Adobe began to market a Windows version in 1992.  At the time both platforms were nowhere near as robust as they are today. Mac OS 7 and 9 where  poor and buggy and windows was full of bugs.   Mac were using the Power PC processor and PC lintel 8088 family.   Intel the came out with 386 that gave PC mainframe features and Windoes NT and Windows 2000 were developed  PC were becoming of age.  Steve Jobs returned to Apple and IBM would not produce a power efficient PowerPC for Steve's desired laptop  had also use Unix for his Nextstep adventure and knew its virtues. So in a single step he abandoned Apples's OS and the PowerPC. processor.  So now Apple Mac and IBM compatible PC are using the same hardware Processors.  Both platforms have a robust OS these days both are  preemptive multitasking systems.  Mac OS base design is Unix like.  Unix was developed by AT&T Lucent lab in the 1960 time-frame for the PDP 11. Design to be modular and portable where code would be easy to developed using  simple module using pipe-ing data just flows input to output.  Apple is more controlling then Microsoft IMO neither are open system but Apple seems more closed then Microsoft to me.   This has advantages and disadvantages.  Application operation constrain to work the way Apple dictates users get a more consistent environment but less software and Hardware less upgradable.  Photoshop on both platform run into problem easily seen just read through this forum.  I use windows for I had to at work and a gained a lot of knowledge about windows over the years. I'm not about to change.  I also had to use Apple OS 7 and 9 for a little while.  If you going to use computers you will have to learn quite a bit about the OS installed on it.  All computers need to be maintained and backed up.  If you only going to use one application you may be able to get a turn key system.    Find the best products for the jobs you need to do.   You may find you need more then one machine and OS.

  • XP 64bit Beta OS for AMD64 - old news?

    I'm a 64-bit wannabe, maybe old news, came across this link to get Free *Beta* downloads of either Windows XP 64-BIT Windows Server OR desktop for AMD64, download {90 minutes on DSL} here  
    I'm learning what i need for my build reading the boards,  decided to wait a few months for the socket 939's, PCIExpress, etc,  but gee whiz . . .
    RexB

    Geez SAB, did i really say that, i'm a dunderhead!  Howlongagodidiwritethat,omigawdanybodyelseseenit?
    Thanks, I added them to "Da List".  As i'm digging in reviews and comparison matching and blahblahblah and wasting my meager 56k{42k} bandwidth {waaaa No hi-speed out here in the stix, satellite is price-gouging}
     The quote "K8T800 PRO might give you more BIOS options or CPU speed" endquote.  What does 'might' mean.  If the board gets mad at me it won't give me all it's options?
      Don't laugh, some of this stuff is smoke & mirrors. Yes, there is a possibility that shamans have an 'in' to the spirit world, and these "invisible-to-the-naked-eye-millions-of-transistors-and-doped-silicone" might too in their electromagnetic aura {cancer?tumors?}, who knows?  I'm not superstitious, just careful about pi***ng the wrong things off.
      I'm guessing that cuz i'm not real concerned about advanced graphics or gaming that i wouldn't care if my board was the "K8N for it's AGP/PCI lock". This Anandtech March 23, 2004 test of these chipsets and the N250's predecessor, for what it's worth.  Unbelievable the 2nd-to-last last line of 2nd paragraph.
    . . .""At launch, there were really just two Athlon 64 chipsets - the nVidia nForce3 150 and VIA K8T800. As we have discussed in reviews of boards based on these chipsets, neither one really meets the specifications that we would like to see in Athlon 64 chipsets. Later, SiS introduced the promising 755 chipset, but no one has brought the kind of 755 boards that we hoped to see to market. In addition, our recent tests of the PCI locks on all 3 Athlon 64 chipsets found that none of them really worked. Given this background, we were more than ready for a new chipset for Athlon 64 that would fix many of the issues.""
    Did the K8T800 PRO fix this?               blahblahblah then it goes on:
    . . .""The non-working PCI lock that we later found on nF3-150 also came as a huge surprise. nVidia tells us, and we did confirm, that the PCI lock does work on the nVidia Reference Board for nF3-150, but they are also aware that it did not work in production nF3-150 motherboards. nVidia assures us that this BIOS programming issue is fixed in nF3-250.""
      Can ya' take that to the bank?  How many unsuspecting buyerz got that 150 board for the non-functional PCI lock?!?
    . . I'm just getting into it, but these are the same chipsets on the market today, two months after the article, right, sans the nF3-150?

  • What preset MacBook pro would be better for video editing and eventually college?, What preset MacBook pro would be better for video editing and eventually college?

    Hi,
    I am thinking about getting a MacBook Pro.  My current computer is very very old and can not be used.  I would like to use it for video editing and eventually to use when I go to college.  I want to get one of the preset 13 inch MBPs.  I do not know which one will be better for my purposes.  Could anyone please help me??

    Any computer made today, Windows or Mac, will be MILES ahead of what you are now using.
    Raw CPU speed is not the total benchmark of a computer. Look at it this way. A 2.6GHz CPU made today is much faster then a 2.6GHz CPU made just a few years ago, like 3 years ago. the difference between a 2.6 and a 2.9GHz CPU is 3 tens of 1 GHz, 300MHz. The percentage difference is about 8-9 percent (.08-.09). Back when CPUs were listed in MHz, 120, 300, 600, if you have a 300MHz CPU and you replaced it with one that was 300MHz faster that was a Big Jump. You doubled the computing power. Today 300MHz, .3GHz, is next to nothing. Especially for the price jump.
    Note that when you make the switch you will either need to update your program, that means Re-Buying most of them, to work on the Mac OS or install a version of Windows in either a Boot Camp partition, Dual booting the Mac, or into a Virtual Machine software program to run the Windows version of those program.
    If you decide on a Mac buy the BASE model that is offered for the CPU speed you want. The RAM and hard drive can be upgraded by you for much less then what Apple charges for those upgrades. With the hard drive if you upgrade it to a larger and faster drive, Apple supplies 5400RPM drives, like a 7200RPM drive you get to Keep the original drive to use in any way you like. Like an external drive.

  • What are the better load/performance testing tools available for Flex Application with BlazeDS RO?

    In my application is designed with Flex3, ActionScript3, BlazeDS Remote Objects.
    Just i tried with OPENSTA but i cant do the dynamic parameterization in their generated scripts because the response of the calls is binary values and also we cant get the response using with SCL language.
    While testing with OPENSTA with HttpService, i can do the dynamic parameterization and got the response.
    can give the information about the below questions
    whether we can do dynamic parameterization with OPENSTA for Flex Remote objects?
    and  what are the better load/performance tools available for Flex Remote Objects?

    Your approach is fine, depending on how many and what type of CFCs you are talking about. If they are "singletons" - that is, only one instance of each CFC is needed to be in memory and can be reused/shared from multiple parts of your application - caching them in the application scope is common.  Just make sure they are thread safe ("var" or local.* all your method variables).
    You might consider taking advantage of a dependency injection framework, such as DI/1 (part of the FW/1 MVC framework), ColdSpring, or WireBox (a module of the ColdBox platform that can be used independently).  They have mechanisms for handling and caching singletons.  Then you wouldn't have to go to the application scope to get your CFC instances.
    -Carl V.

  • Hi. im ipad and ipohe user. now i want to buy my first macbook. i need to know what is better for me: macbook pro 13´´ or macbook air 13´´?? or another??

    hi. im ipad and ipohe user. now i want to buy my first macbook. i need to know what is better for me: macbook pro 13´´ or macbook air 13´´?? or another??
    i will not move it frecuently from home because i always have with me the iphone and sometimes the ipad.
    im looking apple store online because im trying to buy it refubrished (im from argentina and travel to NYC next month)...
    please i hear you...!

    Light weight basic needs, power miser - MacBook Air (glossy screens)
    Semi-light weight basic needs, more storage, DVD drive, hot machine (no 3D gaming) - 13" MacBook Pro (glossy screens)
    Bit heavier, pro needs, 3D gaming, cool machine, power hungry, - 15" MacBook Pro  (anti-glare screen option, recommended)
    Same as above, larger screen for HD video, cool machine,  power hungry, 17" MacBook Pro (anti-glare screen option, recommended)

  • I don't know what i need. I'am a mac user but i need to run quick books premier. This is the only software i need in windows 7. Could i have some advise in  what is better for me, Bootcamp or parallels

    I don't know what i need. I'am a mac user but i need to run quick books premier. This is the only software i need in windows . Could i have some advise in  what is better for me, Bootcamp or Parallels

    The Intuit rep said they don't "support" QuickbooksPremier on a "virtual machine." Do you know what I risk by using it, anyway? thanks for the advice about Boot Camp vs Parallels, BTW!
    I use QuickBooks Pro for Mac, so I haven't had need to try any of the Windows versions in a VM. But I can't think why it wouldn't work. From within the VM, QuickBooks Premier would believe it is operating on PC hardware within Windows.
    I would guess they mean that the multiple user support wouldn't work from within the VM. But I would think that would also work. Windows can see the Internet from within the VM, which means it can see your network. So if Windows can see the network, then QB Premier should be able to, too.
    I know you can get Parallels as a demo, and maybe you could get QB Premier as trial software. So if you already have a retail copy of Windows to load into a VM, it would only cost you time to test what's possible.

  • What is better for flowmeter totalization

    What is better for flowmeter totalization, a pulsetrain or current loop? I have the option of using a pulsetrain or a 4-20mA loop. Would I have to integrate if the current loop is chosen?

    If you use flowmeters with switch-type sensing (flips over when a given fluid chamber is full), your input signal is digital: a pulse.
    It is most obvious to use a counter (available on many DAQ-cards) to totalise the amount of pulses.
    Integration of analog signals (like 4-20mA) may give trouble due to drift (non-zero inputs).
    Patrick de Boevere

  • What is better for iphone 3gs ios 5 or ios4

    i am just wondering what is better for this model

    Ios 5 has more features and is the latest software.

Maybe you are looking for